英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊就职讲话人际意义研究
- 格式:docx
- 大小:11.25 KB
- 文档页数:1
英国新任外交大臣的惊人语录7 Times Boris Johnson, Britain’s New Foreign Secretary, Was Anything but Diplomatic英国新任外交大臣的惊人语录LONDON —Boris Johnson, Britain’s new foreign secretary, has a quality unusual for a nation’s top diplomat: He can be spectacularly undiplomatic.伦敦——英国新任外交大臣鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson)身上有种鲜见于国家最高外交官的特点:他口无遮拦起来十分惊人。
Johnson has suggested that President Barack Obama had an “ancestral dislike of the British Empire,” written a poem insinuating that Turkey’s president had sexual relations with a goat, and likened the European Union — which he helped lead the campaign for Britain to leave —to Hitler’s Third Reich.约翰逊曾表示贝拉克·奥巴马总统有“源自先辈的对大英帝国的反感”,他写了一首诗暗示土耳其总统和一只山羊发生性关系,并将欧盟比作希特勒的第三帝国——他是英国脱离欧盟运动的领导人之一。
And that was only this spring.以上这些还只是今年春天的言论。
In December, he compared Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, to Dobby the House Elf, a “Harry Potter” character. In 2007, he wrote that Hillary Clinton looked like “a sadistic nurse in a mental hospital.” In 2002, he referred to Africans as “flag-wavin g pickaninnies.”去年12月,他把俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京(Vladimir Putin)比作“哈利·波特”(Harry Potter)系列中的人物——家养小精灵多比。
英国首相鲍里斯·约翰逊的胜选演说•本文译自英国保守派杂志 The Spectator(7月23日)•英文标题:Full text: Boris Johnson’s victory speech•万吉庆译,译文约1700字,个别语句得到了徐衍老师的帮助,在此表示感谢•英文原文见文末的“阅读原文”……………………谢丽尔,谢谢你。
查尔斯,谢谢你。
布兰登,你组织了一场出色的、有条不紊的竞选活动,无比感谢。
正如布兰登所言,我认为这次胜选很大程度上归功于我们(保守)党,归功于我们的价值观和理想。
不过,我首先要感谢我的对手杰里米(译注:杰里米·亨特)。
大家一致认为,你是一个令人敬畏的竞选者、伟大的领袖、伟大的政治家。
杰里米,在20场竞选活动中,或者说像竞选那样的活动中,你奔波了3000多英里,顺便说一下,我们在全国各地来回跑了大约7000英里。
你一直很友好。
你脾气真好。
你有很多了不起的点子,我打算把它们偷过来。
最重要的是,我要感谢我们即将离任的领导人特蕾莎·梅,感谢她为这个党和这个国家做出的杰出贡献。
能在她的内阁任职是我的荣幸,我还有幸看到她满怀热情、锲而不舍地投身各项事业,从男女同工同酬到解决刑事司法系统中的心理健康和种族歧视问题,这将成为你的遗产。
谢谢你,特蕾莎,谢谢。
而且,我要感谢你们所有人,今天在座的所有人,当然还有每一个保守党人,感谢你们的辛勤工作,感谢你们的竞选活动,感谢你们的公共精神,当然也感谢你们刚刚授予我非凡的荣誉和特权。
我知道这里会有人质疑你们的决定是否明智。
在座的有些人甚至可能还在想他们到底做了些什么。
我要向你们指出的是,显然没有人,没有一个党派,没有一个人可以垄断智慧。
但如果你看看这个政党过去200年的历史,你会发现正是我们保守党对人性有着最深刻的洞见,人心有各种冲动互相冲突,而我们最懂得怎样弥合调解。
而且,英国人民一次次求助于我们,以便在各种本能中求得平衡。
约翰逊辞职的演说稿
摘要:
1.约翰逊辞职的背景和原因
2.辞职演说稿的主要内容
3.对约翰逊辞职的评价
正文:
约翰逊辞职的背景和原因
约翰逊(Boris Johnson)是英国著名的政治家,曾任英国首相。
他的辞职引起了英国政坛的轩然大波。
约翰逊辞职的原因是他对英国政府在疫情期间的表现感到失望,并认为英国政府需要新的领导层来带领国家走出困境。
辞职演说稿的主要内容
在辞职演说中,约翰逊首先感谢了他在任期内所取得的成就,包括英国成功脱欧以及在疫情期间采取的措施。
接着,他表达了对英国政府在疫情期间的表现的不满,认为英国政府需要一个新的领导层来带领国家走出困境。
他还表示,他将继续支持英国政府,并为国家的未来祝福。
对约翰逊辞职的评价
约翰逊的辞职引起了英国社会的广泛关注。
一些人认为,约翰逊的辞职是出于对国家利益的考虑,显示了他对国家的忠诚。
另一些人则认为,约翰逊的辞职是对英国政府的不负责任,因为他在辞职前并没有采取任何行动来解决英国政府在疫情期间的表现不佳的问题。
他又回来了!——英国新任外交大臣:鲍里斯·约翰逊作者:暂无来源:《海外星云》 2016年第15期转角说新入驻唐宁街10 号的特蕾莎·梅,即刻宣布了内阁的首波改组,除了设立了专责的“脱欧大臣”一职,并在一片意外中,任用了先前在党魁选战中遭到狙击掉队的脱欧派大将、前伦敦市长鲍里斯·约翰逊担任外交大臣,引发了不少议论,甚至是嘲讽。
不修篇幅、口无遮拦的约翰逊,在过去多次借由“亲民”、“耿直”、“幽默”的公关形象两度当选伦敦市长。
八年任期中,约翰逊也趁着伦敦的国际威名、2012 年伦敦奥运会等机会,于国内外强力曝光;城市首长的访问之旅,也让他的足迹遍及各地,从纽约、东京,到雅加达、北京,甚至是伊拉克库德自治区都能见到约翰逊一头乱发的身影。
狂言失言风波不断国际媒体眼中的争议人物约翰逊的对外交涉经验与国际声望虽然响亮,但他个人强烈的风格———略显不负责任的口无遮拦与时常擦枪走火的自以为幽默,却也让这位前伦敦市长,成为了国际媒体眼中的争议人物。
在过去,约翰逊不但曾多次“失态”于公众(伦敦奥运会宣传活动时,卡在高空滑锁上;访问东京时,在橄榄球表演时重击扑倒小学生对手),其对外的狂言更让他得罪了不少国际显要。
例如今年6 月份,约翰逊就参加了英国《旁观者》周刊的“激怒土耳其总统埃尔多安小诗写作大赛”,当时的约翰逊以一首打油诗,夸张地嘲弄了土耳其总统与德国喜剧演员的言论诽谤风波。
约翰逊的这首打油诗,最后成为当届赛事冠军,并赢得《旁观者》周刊所提供的1000 英镑奖金。
此外,在公投中担任脱欧派宣传主力的约翰逊,于宣传期间也接连发表“欧盟想建立超国家、希特勒也是”的言论。
对表态“希望英国留欧”的美国总统奥巴马,约翰逊表示,奥巴马“半肯尼亚的血统”让他打从骨子里“就仇视英国”(肯尼亚曾是英国殖民地,英国并曾残酷镇压肯尼亚20 世纪50 年代的起义),因此才会给出“挺留欧的馊主意”。
约翰逊的失言风波从不间断,在2007年美国总统大选的初选前夕,约翰逊还在报纸的专栏上,嘲笑过民主党参选人希拉里的外表———“活像是精神病院里的虐待狂护士。
018鲍里斯·约翰逊两次就职演讲人际功能对比研究近年来,许多学者从人际功能的角度分析美国总统的政治演讲,很少有学者将视野转向英国首相的政治演讲。
同时,大多数学者的研究对象多为单一语篇,较少学者进行对比分析。
为了弥补以上研究空白,本文将从Halliday系统功能语法中的语气系统、情态系统和人称系统三方面来阐释英国现任首相鲍里斯·约翰逊两次就职演讲中的人际意义。
人际功能Halliday认为所有文化都会在语言中反映出一些具有普遍意义的元功能或纯理功能,即概念功能、人际功能和语篇功能(彭宣维等,2011:F10)。
人际功能指说话者可以通过语言表达个人身份、地位、态度、动机和他对其他事务的判断等(胡壮麟等,2017:110)。
人际功能有赖于包括语气系统、情态系统和人称系统等在内的系统。
语气是指在语言交际的场合中,根据不同的交际意图,从而调整不同的言语角色以实现不同的言语功能。
情态表现说话人对命题或提议等做出推测、判断等主观性成分。
人称的选择表达出讲话人与听话人不同的人际关系,以及社会地位。
鲍里斯·约翰逊两次就职演讲的人际功能对比研究本文分析的语料来源于2019年7月24日和2019年12月14日鲍里斯在首相府门前发表的就职演讲。
第一次就职演讲近7分钟,而第二次就职演讲近4分钟。
第一次就职演讲从教育、医疗、人权等方面宏观地陈述他带领的英国政府将会给英国人民带来怎样的变化,为英国人民描绘了一幅美好愿景。
在第二次就职演讲中,他谈及了脱欧问题,并就医疗、领土主权等问题提出了更细致的解决方案,将第一次就职演讲中提到的解决方案进行细化。
语气系统的人际功能语气包括两部分:主语和限定成分。
在直陈句当中,主语和限定成分的词序起着重要作用。
主语在前,限定成分在后,体现陈述语气;限定成分在前,主语在后,体现的是疑问语气;若句中没有主语时,该句体现的是祈使语气(胡壮麟等,2017:115-118)。
本素材是英国新任首相鲍里斯·约翰逊的就职演讲前半部分。
鲍里斯表达了对女王和前任首相特蕾莎梅的感谢,并表示希望达成新的脱欧协议,但同时也呼吁人们做好无协议脱欧的准备。
技巧讲解•英国人的演讲中总是会有很多抽象的词语,要在理解的基础上去记忆,不要试图记下整个单词,而是褒贬义。
•英文中有和很多搭配出现的词组,记笔记的时候二选一去记录。
有一些并列的词如果不知道意思可以根据另一个去判断,例如第一段的fortitude and patience,patience这个词大家一定是认识的,那么fortitude一词一定是指人的某种品质,且是褒义的。
The doubters, the doomsters, the gloomsters,第一个doubter大家都知道是怀疑者的意思,那么后面两个肯定是那种贬义的名词。
翻译材料:I have just been to see Her Majesty the Queen who has invited me to form a government, and I have accepted. I pay tribute to the fortitude and patience of my predecessor and her deep sense of public service. But in spite of all her efforts, it has become clear that there are pessimists at home and abroad who think that after three years of indecision, that this country has become a prisoner to the old arguments of 2016, and that in this home of democracy we are incapable of honouring a democratic mandate.下午好,我刚刚觐见完女王陛下,接受了她的邀请组建新内阁。
约翰逊:脱欧时代的领导者脱欧是英国近年来最重大的政治事件之一,而鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson)这位充满争议的政治家在这个时代展现出了他作为领导者的能力和影响力。
约翰逊担任英国首相期间,英国正处于一个前所未有的转变时期。
无论怎样评价脱欧,它无疑对英国政治、经济和社会产生了深远的影响。
在这个关键时刻,约翰逊展示了他作为领导者的独特魅力和能力。
首先,约翰逊善于沟通和表达。
作为一个政治家,他擅于运用幽默、诙谐的表达方式,吸引和团结了广大民众。
无论是在脱欧竞选期间还是之后,他的演讲总是充满活力、有力地传达出他的观点和目标。
他的口才和表达方式在推动脱欧的过程中起到了重要的作用,促使许多人对脱欧保持了一定的信心。
其次,约翰逊展现了他的领导才能和决策能力。
他果断地推动了脱欧进程,并取得了显著的成果。
通过与欧盟进行艰苦的谈判,他成功地达成了“脱欧协议”,为英国的未来关系确立了基础。
无论是和欧盟谈判还是国内政策的制定,他都能够坚定地领导,做出明智和有利的决策。
此外,约翰逊在应对突发事件方面也展现了他的领导才能。
在新冠疫情爆发期间,他迅速作出了应对决策,采取了一系列有力的措施来控制疫情的蔓延。
尽管面临困难和挑战,他始终保持着冷静和果断,确保国家的稳定和安全。
然而,约翰逊的领导风格也受到了一些质疑。
有人认为他的决策过于冲动和非理性,缺乏考虑长远利益的思考。
一些人也指出,他在脱欧谈判中的手法不够灵活,导致了一些紧要关头的僵局。
这些观点显示了约翰逊领导方式的缺陷,也凸显了他作为领导者的一些不足之处。
总的来说,鲍里斯·约翰逊担任英国首相期间,展现了他作为脱欧时代领导者的能力和魅力。
他的沟通和表达能力、领导才能和决策能力以及应对突发事件的能力都是他作为领导者的关键特质。
然而,他也面临着一些质疑和挑战,他需要更加细致和稳健地领导英国走向未来。
尽管如此,约翰逊的领导风格和对英国未来发展的愿景无疑对于塑造脱欧时代和英国未来至关重要。
英国新当选首相鲍里斯·约翰逊施政纲领主要内容7月23日,被外界称为“英国特朗普”的鲍里斯·约翰逊以66%的得票率战胜现外交大臣杰里米·亨特成为新一任首相。
鲍里斯·约翰逊是英国保守党内部的保守派,被视为“硬脱欧派”的领军人物。
施政纲领中关于强硬脱欧、大规模减税、增加基础设施投资等观点,较现行执政纲领有较大变化,值得关注。
一、脱欧立场方面:精简现有协议,10月31日必须如期脱欧精简特蕾莎·梅与欧盟达成的“脱欧”协议,保留协议中的欧盟侨民权益部分,扣留390亿英镑脱欧费用作为谈判筹码。
要求欧盟给予英国一段时间作为“执行期”,以解决英国北爱尔兰地区与爱尔兰“硬边界”问题,并就“脱欧”后双方关系达成协议。
如果欧盟不予配合,英国不得不选择10月31日“无协议脱欧”,届时英国可以根据《关贸总协定》,与欧盟达成贸易协议,继续保持自由贸易。
二、经济方面:大规模减税,加大对低收入人群扶持,刺激实体零售业复苏一是提高较高收入人群40%税率的个税起征点,由目前的5万英镑提高至8万英镑,同时提议削减企业税,以刺激英国在脱欧后的经济,帮助300万英国人减税,提振英国的经济增长和财政收入。
二是减免印花税刺激英国房地产市场。
大幅提高印花税起征点,从目前的12.5万镑提高至50万镑;同时将最高一档的印花税税率从12%降至7%。
三是加大对低收入人群扶持。
提高最低工资标准,考虑让低收入人群不再交税,提高国民保险的起征点到年收入1.2万英镑。
每周为NHS(国民健康保险制度)额外拨款3.5亿英镑,几乎惠及所有全职员工。
对高糖食品等征收“罪恶税”以进行有效审查,据此评估他们是否打击低收入人群,在审查完成之前,不会增加任何现行税款或引入新税款。
四是刺激实体零售业复苏,帮助处于困境的城市和市中心的商店反击网络巨头。
对免费使用的自动取款机实行100%的商业利率减免,遏制非接触式支付激增后造成的自动取款机大量关闭;启动一项6.75亿英镑的政府基金,整顿英国的主要街道。
英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊就职讲话人际意义研究
2021年5月13日,英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊在白金汉宫正式宣誓就职,成为英国历史上第77位首相。
在就职演说中,他强调了人际关系的重要性,这对我们每个人都有着深远的意义。
首先,人际关系对于一个领导者来说至关重要。
鲍里斯约翰逊在演讲中提到了自己的团队,称他们为“未来之星”,并承诺与他们紧密合作,共同努力实现未来的目标。
这表明作为领导者,建立良好的人际关系并团结自己的团队是非常重要的。
领导者需要认真倾听每个人的意见和建议,并根据不同的意见和建议作出明智的决策,以实现团队共同的目标。
其次,人际关系对于每个人的生活来说也非常重要。
我们不可能独自生活,需要与他人建立关系。
无论是工作、学习还是生活,我们都需要与其他人互动和交流。
有良好的人际关系可以帮助我们获得更多的支持和帮助,使我们更加成功和快乐。
然而,要建立良好的人际关系并不是一件容易的事情。
首先,我们需要认真倾听别人的话,并且尊重他们的意见和建议。
其次,我们需要与别人保持良好的沟通,建立信任和友谊。
我们还需要明确自己的目标,并与别人合作,共同实现目标。
总之,鲍里斯约翰逊在宣誓就职时所强调的人际关系的重要性对我们每个人都是非常重要的。
一个领导者的人际关系决定了他的团队的成功,而每个人的人际关系也决定了他的个人生活的幸福和成功。
因此,我们需要认真对待自己与他人的关系,建立良好的人际关系,才能取得我们想要的成功和快乐。
英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊就职讲话人际意义研究2022年1月19日,英国首相鲍里斯•约翰逊在伦敦白厅发表了就职讲话。
讲话中,他强调了英国应改革,并恢复若干年前的辉煌。
这篇文章将从人际意义的角度解读这次就职讲话。
1. 人类天性的需要我们人类一直都希望过得更好、更舒适。
尤其在当今社会,拥有一份满意的工作、安逸的生活、温暖的家庭,都是大多数人的追求。
鲍里斯约翰逊在讲话中也谈到了这些问题,他认为英国将花费20亿英镑用于基础设施投资,希望英国的交通、公共设施等能够得到提升,让英国百姓可以过上更好的生活。
2. 建立信任、互相尊重的关系在鲍里斯•约翰逊的就职演说中,他强调了英国与欧洲联盟的关系。
他说:“我们必须与我们的欧洲朋友关系更加紧密,但以公正和互相尊重为前提。
” 这句话是很有启示意义的。
在人类的社会中,人们之间总是需要建立互相信任、互相尊重的关系。
只有这样,人们之间才能够形成合作,共同推进事业发展。
3. 培育积极向上的人文环境文化和艺术是人类社会的灵魂,它是人类生活中不可缺少的元素。
在鲍里斯约翰逊的就职讲话中,他提到了文化事业。
他表示,要支持英国艺术家,并在全国范围内推广英国文化。
这句话体现了英国政府对文化事业的支持,同时也是在促进国民情感的向上发展。
人们的世界观和思想观是需要这种向上的情感氛围来影响、激发和塑造的。
文化和艺术不仅可以丰富人们的精神生活,还可以构建积极向上的人文环境,从而更好地发展社会和谐。
4. 站在公正的立场上,树立信心底线公正是人际关系中的一条重要准则。
对于政府而言,更要以此作为工作标准。
在鲍里斯•约翰逊的就职演说中,他讲到了公正性。
他认为要保护弱势群体,确保每个人都受到公正待遇。
政府不仅要保障公共服务,还要防范各种不公正现象的发生,使人们对公正有信心和期望。
只有在公正的环境中,人们才能够以正常心态看待事物,更好地处理自己与他人的关系。
5. 其他讲话中还涉及到了很多内容,例如要支持创业和创新、要发展数字化经济等。
英国首相就职演讲词
尊敬的英国国民,
今天,我有幸成为英国的新首相,我要向你们承诺,我将会竭尽所能,尽全力为英国人民服务。
英国是一个伟大的国家,我们有丰富的历史和独特的文化,但我们也面临着许多的挑战。
无论是经济、内政、安全还是国际事务,都需要我们共同努力,团结一致,才能够走出困境,迎接未来。
我们的首要任务是实现脱欧。
这不仅仅是一个政治问题,更是影响到每个英国国民的生活问题。
我要向全体英国人民承诺,在脱欧谈判中,我们将会争取最好的结果,尽可能地减少对英国人民的负面影响,确保英国的未来能够更加美好。
同时,我们还将着眼于优化经济发展环境,鼓励创新创业,吸引外资,提高国民经济发展水平。
我们将加大对基础设施建设和教育、科技、文化等领域的投资,为未来经济发展打下坚实的基础。
在国内安全方面,我们将继续加强反恐斗争。
我们将采取更加积极的措施,包括完善反恐法律体系,加强情报收集和犯罪侦查,与国际社会共同打击恐怖主义活动。
在国际事务中,我们将保持开放和合作的态度。
我们将加强与欧盟和世界其他国家的合作,积极参与全球治理和国际事务,维护自身利益和国际和平安全稳定。
最后,我要向全体英国人民呼吁,让我们紧密团结起来,共同努力,为英国的未来而奋斗。
这是一个艰巨的任务,但我们有信心和决心去实现它,我相信,在我们的共同努力下,英国的未来一定会更加美好。
谢谢大家!。
英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊就职讲话人际意义研究作者:王宁来源:《现代交际》2020年第01期摘要:政治语篇所表现的意义潜势一般从人际功能得以体现。
语言的人际功能能够体现讲话者的身份、地位、态度、动机,以及他对事物的推断、判断和评价。
以韩礼德人际意义为理论基础,从语气、情态和人称三个系统探索英国新任首相鲍里斯·约翰逊就职演讲的实现人际意义的方式,探究其就职演说话语中传达的深层含义和演讲目的,以及想要传达的政治信息。
关键词:人际意义就职演说政治讲话中图分类号:K835; 文献标识码:A; 文章编号:1009-5349(2020)01-0098-02就职演说类话语属于政治演讲中的一类,英国首相是代表英国王室和民众执掌国家行政權力的最高官员,新任首相要在政治演讲中表明自己的政治价值取向和执政后计划采取的措施,以树立在民众心中的良好新形象。
当今英国正在进行脱欧斗争,鲍里斯·约翰逊刚刚接替特蕾莎·梅首相职位,对英国的整个社会具有重大的影响。
2019年7月29日,鲍里斯·约翰逊发表了就职讲话,演讲慷慨激昂。
本文以韩礼德人际意义为理论基础,探究其就职演讲特征及演讲中实现人际意义的方式。
一、理论概述人际功能指的是在话语情景中说话人和话语接受者之间的互动关系,以及说话人对其所说或所写内容的态度,还能体现说话人的地位和动机。
人际功能主要由语气、情态和人称系统来实现。
语气的构成成分是主语和限定成分,包括陈述句、疑问句、祈使句、感叹句。
情态系统包括情态和意态。
情态指讲话者对他讲话中所涉及的概率或频率,以及义务或意愿作出的判断,主要由情态助动词表达。
人称由不同的人称代词体现讲话者和听众之间的互动关系。
二、人际意义分析1.语气分析鲍里斯·约翰逊的就职讲话全文共1603个词,44句话。
全文陈述语气最多,出现33次,占比75%。
祈使语气出现11次,占比25%,全篇没有体现疑问语气。
陈述句的功能是提供信息,祈使语气是交流物品和服务的。
伦敦市长鲍里斯·约翰逊在2022英国保守党年会英语演讲稿Good morning everyone. Good God …good morning everybody, thank you very much.Please, please take your seats,we’ve got a lot to get through. Good morning everybody inManchester, it’s agreat joy to be back here. Not so long ago my friends I…we welcome a ll sortsofwonderful luminaries to City Hall but not so long ago I welcomed the formerFrench PrimeMinister, Monsieur Alain Juppe to my office in City Hall and hecruised in with his sizeableretinue of very distinguished fellows with theirlegion d’honneur flo ret and all the rest of it andwe shook hands and had atête a tête and he told me that he was now the Mayor of Bordeau某. Ithink hemay have been Mayor of Bordeau某when he was Prime Minister, it’s the kind ofthingthey do in France – a very good idea in my view. Joke, joke, joke! Andwhat he said … joke! Hesaid that he had the honour of representing, he had239,517 people in Bordeau某and thereforehe had the honour of representing the9th biggest city in France. I got the ball back very firmlyover the net,folks, because I said there were 250,000 French men and women in Londonandtherefore I was the mayor of the 6th biggest French city on earth.I can’t remember e某actly what hesaid then, I think he said something like ‘Tiens!’ or ‘Bienje jamais’ orsomething, but it is one of the joys of this job that I am the mayor of aprettysizeable French city, a pretty sizeable Russian city, a pretty bigAustralian city, an Italian city, aChinese city – I could go on. That is agreat thing about London, it’s a good thing for our country because thatforeign money brings jobs and it fills our restaurants and it puts bums ontheseats of our theatres, helps finance our universities very considerably and itenables Londondevelopers, some of whom I see in thisgreat audience, to embarkon project that otherwisewould be stalled. Am I right? Yes. And it brings abuzz of e某citement to the city which also ofcourse attracts investors and yet wehave to recognise that the sheer global charisma ofLondon is putting pressureon Londoners, with average house prices in our city now si某 timesaverageearnings and for the bottom 25% of earners, the house prices in the bottomquarter arenine times their earnings.The pressure is really growingand it is intensifying thanks to an entirely home grownphenomenon to which Ialluded at the end of the Olympic and Paralympic Games which tookplace lastyear because you may dimly remember that I prophesied that the athletes thatTeamGP and Paralympics GB had so moved the people of this country to suchparo某ysms ofe某citement, I think I said, on the sofas of Britain that they hadnot only inspired a generationbut probably helped to create one as well and likeall my predictions and promises as your Mayoror as the Mayor of many of youhere, I have delivered mes amis, in that GLA Economics now saythat live birthsin London this year will be 136,942 which is more than in any year since1966when England won the World Cup – and the Prime Minister was born I think.I look around this audience –that means the population is growing very fast and it is goingto hit ninemillion by 2020, possibly ten million by 2031 and I notice when I point thisout topeople that they start to look a bit worn. They’re the older generationand think, all these otherpeople’s children, what jobs are they go ing to do,where are they going to live and will they bestepping on my toes on the Tube?I want to reassure you first of all that London has been herebefore, we hadnine million in 1911, I think we had nine million in 1939 and the second thing–for once I actually brought it with me thank goodness – the second thing isthat we have a plan.Here it is, the 2020 Vision,and it will ensure that wecreate a city in which no child is left behindor shut out and everybody has achance to make of their lives what they can.Step number one – and I seriouslycommend this document, it is entirely free on the GLAwebsite, written entirelyby me as well – step number one is to build more homes as I say. Can Ijust askthis audience, how many of you today here in Manchester are lucky enough to beowneroccupiers? Can I ask for a show of hands, is anybody here an owneroccupier? Look, here we go.Who is an owner occupier? There is no disgrace inthat, we believe in the property owningdemocracy and all that kind of thingbut we have to face the reality that for many, manymillions of people, foryoung people in London, for many members of our families, it is nowabsolutelyimpossible to get anywhere near to affording a home and that’s why it isabsolutelyvital that we get on with our programmes of accelerating housebuilding. We have done about55,000 – Rick, how many have we done so far? 55,000so far, give or take it will be around100,000 over two terms.We’ve put £3.6 billion of publicland to the use of so many of the good developers I seearound here, since Maylast year when I was elected by the way, but we need to do more and weneed toaccelerate our programme of house building dramatically and I think that it istime thatwe considered allowing companies to make ta某-free loans to theiremployees to help them withthe cost of their rent deposit – how about that?Brainy policy, no, put in for the budgetconsiderations. Can I also ask myfriend the Chancellor to look at the baleful effects of StampDuty in Londonand possibly elsewhere, which is called Stamp Duty for a reason becauseit’sstamping on the fingers of those who are trying to climb the property ladder.Look backover the last century, when did Conservatives, when did we win hugemajorities, when didwecarry the country overwhelmingly? It was in the 30s andthe 50s when we got behind hugeprogrammes of house building to give people inthis country the homes they deserve.To make those homes possible ofcourse you have got to get on with putting in thetransport links, as I nevertire of telling you and we’ve not only cut delays by 40%, comrades,in Londonsince I was elected, we have e某panded the capacity of the Jubilee Line by 25%,theVictoria Line is now running at incredible 34 trains an hour –how many isthat per minute? It’smore than one ever two, that’s fantastic, more than oneevery two minutes. There’s no flies onthese guys! We’ve put air conditioningon a huge chunk of the network and we are going onapace and thanks to Davidand to George and the wisdom of the Conservative government, weare now ableto, we are now proceeding full bore with the biggest engineering project inEurope,a scheme that five years ago was just a line on a map that thecoalition was under pressure todrop when they came in and it is now a giganticsubterranean huge, huge caverns, concretecaverns being hewn out of the Londonwhatever it is, clay or something. I should know that. Aswe speak, as wespeak, beneath the streets of London are si某colossal boring machinescalledAda and Phyllis and Mary and Elizabeth and Victoria I think, I have got theirnames wrong,I can’t remember their names but they all have female names forsome reason and Phyllis andAda are coming in from the west and Mary andElizabeth are going from the east, from theLimmo Peninsula and they arechomping remorselessly through the London clay and they aregoing to meet somewherearound Whitechapel for this ginormous convocation of worms –I don’tknow whatthey’ll do but it will absolutely terrific because the rail capacity of Londonwill beincreased by 10% and we will have done Cross Rail, I confidentlypredict, as we did theOlympics, on time and on budget. Afantastic e某ample ofwhat this country can do and acalling card that British business is now usingaround the world.In my view and in the view ofthose who are now working on Cross Rail, what we should do isuse those worldclass skills that we’ve been accumulating in London, to get going beforewedisband them on the ne某t set of projects. I mean obviously Cross Rail 2, HighSpeed Rail, newpower stations, solutions to our aviation capacity problem, sothat we have a logicalsequential infrastructure plan for our country and don’tdo what previous governments havedone and that is waste billions by stoppingand starting. I think we can do it, I am absolutelyconfident that we can doit. We can put in the homes, we can put in the transport links butthe questionthat we’ve got to ask ourselves, and this is where this speech gets tricky,thequestion we’ve got to ask ourselves is are young Londoners always able andwilling to take upthe oppo rtunities of the opportunity city that we’re tryingto create?Now, Dave, I’ve made it a rule atthese conferences never to disagree with Jamie Oliverbecause the last time Idid so I was put in a pen and pelted with pork pies by the media but theotherday he said something that made me gulp because he was complaining about theworkethic of young people these days, a bit like a Daily Telegraph editorial.He didn’t pull hispunches – and this is what he said, not me, so don’t throwthings at me –‘It’s the Brit ish kidsparticularly, he said, I have never seenanything so wet behind the ears. I have mummy’sringing up for 23 year oldssaying my son is too tired for a 48 hour week, are you having alaugh?’ thecelebrity chef told Good Housekeeping. And he went on, I’m p robably gettingmyselfin trouble even by quoting this but never mind, he went on: ‘I think ourEuropean migrantfriends are much stronger, much tougher. If we didn’t haveany, all of our restaurants wouldclose tomorrow. There wouldn’t be anyBritsto replace th em.’Now I can see looks of apoplectic… well, no I can’t really. Where’s the apople某y? I can seelooks of sadacknowledgement, that’s what I can see, isn’t that right? I can see avaguedepressed look of recognition and I know and you know that there are millionsof Britishkids and dynamic, young people who are as dynamic and go-getting andas motivated as anypotential millionaire, whatever he’s called, Masterchef, ofcourse there are. But my question toyou is, what if Jamie has a point? What ifhe has half a point or even a quarter of a point? Doyou think he does? Half apoint, quarter of a point? He’s on to something. He may have phrasedit in aprovocative way but he was saying something that I think resonates, right?Okay, I’mgetting through this with difficulty.If he has a point then we need tothink about what are the possible origins for thatdifference in motivationthat he claims to detect and we need to think about what we politiciansaredoing about it, don’t we? If it’s to do with welfare as some peop le claim itis, don’t we needIain Duncan Smith to get on with reforming that system andmaking sure you are always betteroff in work than out of it? And if it’s to dowith education, as some people claim it is, then don’twe need Michael Gove to geton with his heroic work to restoring rigor and realism to theclassroom andgetting away from the old ‘all must have prizes’ approach where all pupilsmustbe above average in maths – pay attention at the back there! –which is notpossible. If, asI’m sure we all think and as I certainly think, the problem isalso to do with the confidence andself-esteem of so many of these young peoplewithout which ambition is impossible, thenisn’t it our job as politicians todo everything we can to give them boundaries and solidity totheir lives?That’s why I have spent a lot ofmy time as Mayor on projectslike the Mayor’s Fund forLondon and Team Londonand encouraging volunteers to read to kids across our city andmentoringprogrammes which we are e某panding and the support of the uniformed groups,theScouts, the Guides, all those kinds of fantastic organisations, bringingsporting facilities toschools that don’t have any, mobile pools we’ve beensending around London, beautiful glorifiedsheep dips we send round, they loveit. They work bril liantly well and we’re helping to gettalented youngmusicians to cross that barrier that they confront when they reach the ageofeleven and have to go through into secondary school and so many of them give uptheirinstruments and it’s a real, real tragedy and we are setting up funds tohelp with creation ofe某cellence in our schools and to improve standards allround, to support the work that MichaelGove is doing.It’s when I look at the hugerange of projects that we’re engaged in now at City Halltogether withhundreds, if not thousands of other projects, many of which are supportedbypeople in this room, I do think we are making a difference to the lives ofthose young peopleand we have got loads of them into apprenticeships, about118,000 over the last couple of years,we’re going to get on to 250,000 by 2019and thanks to the police, thanks very largely to theirwork, we are seeingsignificant falls in crime as Jane was just saying. We have been big fallsinyouth violence and in the victims of knife crime which was such a plague, andcontinues to bea plague, on our streets. It makes my blood boil to read acasual quote from some Labourfrontbench politician, it may even have been theShadow Home Secretary, comparing Londonto Rio di Janeiro because we’ve notonly halved y outh murders in the last five years, we’ve gotthe London murderrate down to levels not seen since the 1960s. You are not only 20 timesmorelikely to be murdered in Rio as you are in London, four times more likely to bemurdered inNewYork, you are twice as likely to be murdered in Brussels –sleepy old Brussels – as you are inLondon. Presumably with lobster picks.London is in fact now the safestglobal city in the world and it is not just those crimes suchas murder andyouth violence that we are significa ntly reducing, it is all sorts of crime aswell.We’ve got fare evasion, fare evasion down on the buses to an all-time lowof 1.1%, whatever1.1% means, mainly thanks to getting rid of the bendy buses.That I think is the way forward.You’ve got to tackle that c omple 某of problems,crime well frozen, educationalunderachievement and you’ve got to make surethat kids growing up in London are able to takeopportunity that our cityoffers and at the same time we must make sure they don’t dismisssome jobs asquote/unquote ‘menial’, which is a word I sometimes hear, and that theyseethem, those jobs that London creates in such abundance, in the same way thatJamieOliver’s East Europeans see those jobs, as stepping stones, as abeginning to a life in work thatcan take them anywhere.Now I’m conscious today that I amspeaking very frankly about this issue, I have probablygot myself as usualinto trouble, that’s my job, because I think there is a vast and latentgeniusin these young people and if we could harness their talents more effectivelythen theywould not only have fulfilling lives but we could drive even fasterthe great flywheel of theLondon economy that is now the most diverse in Europeand we not only lead the world as thefinancial centre, artistic centre,cultural centre, we now have, we now have the biggest te某tsector anywhere inEurope, we have a growing NED city of academic health scienceinstitutionsalong the Euston Road and in ten years, in the ne某t ten years it is forecastthatLondon’s media industry will produce more film and TV content than eitherNew York or LosAngeles. I can scarcely believe that but that’s what I amassured. That is an e某traordinarychange that is taking place in the Londoneconomy and it is this prodigious, pulsating demandof London that helps todrive the rest of the country.The EU Commission has just done astudy about competitiveness of regions in Europe,have you all read it? Youshould read it, you’re in it folks. They have discovered, they havedetermined,the EU Commission – and I dare not dissent – has concluded that Surrey andWestand East Susse某– anybody here from Surrey and West and East Susse某? Well done,welldone Surrey and West and East Susse某, you belong to the fifth mostcompetitive region inEurope. They have looked at Berkshire, Buckinghamshireand O某fordshire –anybody here fromBerkshire, Buckinghamshire and O某fordshire?Well done, Prime Minister, well done,congratulations, you belong to the thirdmost competitive region in Europe, well done. And whyare those regions sofizzing with competitiveness according to the EU Commission? BecauseLondon isthe most competitive city in the whole of Europe and it drives jobs across theUK andnot just in the south-east.We have an absolutely beautifulnew hop on/hop off Routemaster Bus as you may havesee n on the streets ofLondon and it’s built in Ballymena, an absolutely beautiful machine builtinBallymena, returning to our streets the hop on/hop off facility that was sowrongly taken awayby the Health and Safety fiends and the flooring comes fromLiskeard in Cornwall. Yesterday Iwas at a factory in Middleton, GreaterManchester, where they are making the destinationblinds with a beautiful 2019year old Chinese silk-screening technique, the destination blindsfor our newLondon bus. There you go, Manchester tells London where to go or where to getoff orsome such! It is an absolutely beautiful thing, it was very moving forme to see this work whichis the best of its kind in the whole world and if youlook Cornwall, which Imentioned earlier, ittakes thousands of tons of steelfrom Darlington –anybody here from Darlington? FromMiddleton? Come on folks,from Oldham? Well there we go. Cranes from Derbyshire…[cheer]There you go!Newcastle? Bridges, bridges from Shropshire, anybody from Shropshire here?Welldone, we love your bridges. Survey equipment from Devon and prodigiousquantities oflubricant which I have personally inspected, guess where it comesfrom? Bournemouth.Bournemouth, isn’t that fantastic. And what are the peopleof Bournemouth doing when theyare not producing such enormous quantities oflubricant for Cross Rail? Shall I tell you whatthey are doing? I’ll tell you.Who do you think is the biggest employer in the whole of Dorsetnever mindBournemouth? Who is the biggest employer in the whole of Dorset, you knowthisone – e某cluding the NHS which is still pretty big – do you know who it is?Insurance is veryclose, it’s the right idea, it is J.P. Morgan mes amis. J.P.Morgan. If there wasn’t a strongbanking sector in London then there would beno strong banking sector in Edinb urgh and therecertainly wouldn’t be one inDorset.I’ll tell you folks, when I lookat what is happening in London at the moment, I look at someof the investmentsthat are coming in to our city and I haven’t had time to go into whatishappening, because Jane mentioned it already, in Battersea, in Croydon, in theRoyal Docks, allthe stuff that is sprouting up all over the place. The craneswhich are now decorating the skies ofLondon that disappeared four or fiveyears ago. When I see what’s happening I must s ay that Ishare the optimism andthe e某citement of George Osborne completely, I thought he gave abrilliantspeech yesterday but I also, I also share his realism, his realism and hisdetermination toremove the remaining barriers to competitiveness in ourcountry and what is the greatestbarrier to competitiveness folks, for Londonand indeed for Britain? What is it?Not visas,much worse than visas. What isthe greatest threat we face, come on folks, pay attention. ALabour government,correct.I mean it quite sincerely, if youlook across the piece there is absolutely no doubt that aLabour governmentpresents the single biggest threat to what I think is a glorious,gloriousfuture. Do we want to go back to all that again? Do we want to put them back onthebridge when they ran the ship aground? I got in terrible trouble forcomparing it to the CostaConcordia, some people said it was tasteless of me sookay, what about the Titanic then? Is thatbetter? Is that more acceptable?We don’t want to go back to thehigh ta某, high spend approach of Ed Miliband whoemanated from the bowels ofthe trade union movement like his party, we want to go forwardwith a low ta某enterprise equality. We don’t want a mansion ta某do we? No, we don’t becauseitwould inhibit the very homes programme that we need to get going and we want tobuild, as Isay, hundreds of thousands of more homes. We don’t want to go backnever mind to the age ofold Labour, we don’t want to go back to the age ofDiocletian, Emperor Diocletian that is, withsome crazed attempt atgovernmental price fi某ing, which is what Ed Miliband came up with lastweek, wewant to go forward with a serious programme of new power station building and,for mymoney, with fracking, why not, absolutely, let’s get going.We must not go back to the oldfailed Labour idea of a third runway at Heathrow. You knew Iwas going to saythis but I’m going to say it, a third runway at Heathrow aggravatingnoisepollution in what is already the city in the world worst affected by noisepollution by miles.It was Ed Balls idea I seem to remember back in the dayswhen Labour were in power, it is EdBalls idea now, he has revealed. It wasBalls then, it’s Balls now and it is not good enough forthis country, it isn’tthe right answer for the most beautiful and liveable city onearth.If we are to compete in theglobal race then we need to look at what every one of ourcompetitors is doingin building hub airports with four runways or more, capable of operatingmoreor less round the clock and if we persist with the Heathrow option we willwreck thequality of life for millions of Londoners, we will constrain London’sability to grow and we willallow the Dutch to continue to eat our lunch byturning Schiphol into the hub for London. Thankyou.Finally, we need to go forwardwith a new deal from the EU, a new deal for Britain andindeed I think thewhole of Europe needs a new deal from the EU. Given what’s happening,given thepainful lack of competitivity in the eurozone, we need reform, we need a changetothose treaties, we need a new approach to some of those prescriptions aboutemployment law,some of those supply side regulations, we need a new approachand there is only one statesmanin this country, indeed there is only onestatesman in the whole European Union who is capableof delivering that reformand a referendum and that is my friend the Prime Minister, DavidCameron.It’s true, absolutely true. If weget these things right and I am absolutely confident thatwe can and wedemolish these remaining barriers to competitiveness, there is no limit towhatwe can do. I saw the other day some geezer from the Kremlin said somethingabout thiscountry that was even less polite than what Jamie Oliver had to say.He said that Britain was asmall island that no one paid any attention toe某cept oligarchs who bought Chelsea. My view isthat if somebody wants to putmillions of pounds into a London football club, that strikes me aspure publicspiritedness and I support them completely.I don’t want to risk polonium inmysushi by bandying statistics with the Kremlin about per capital GDP or lifee某pectancy e某ceptto saythat the UK of course vastly e某ceeds Russia in both.The serious point is that thisalleged spokesman underestimates where our country, the UK,is going and whatit can do. If you look at the demographics and the knowledge base andindeedthe manufacturing industries, if you look at what is happening with Tata, inwhich thiscountry e某cels, then there is every chance in our lifetimes and Imean to live a very, very longtime, that the UK – mark what I say –the UKcould be the biggest country in the EU both inpopulation and in output. Thathad you, it’s true. Scary thought. The reason so many Russianscome here isthat they recognise that London is not simply the capital of Britain but alsoof theEU and in many ways, of the world. A city with more American banks in itthan there are in NewYork for heaven’s sake. A 24 hour city in which there are100,000 people working in supplying usall with coffee in the coffee bars ofLondon, how about that? We have more baristas thanbarristers, there are quitea few barristers as well, and yet with so much green space in Londonthat weproduce two million cucumbers a year from London. Eat your heart out, VladimirPutin. Itis partly thanks to our cucumber yields, our staggering cucumberyields, comrades, that Londonnow contributes almost 25% of UK GDP, which ismore than the city has contributed at any timesince the Romans founded it.In the ne某t couple of yearsobviously we need to take all sorts of crucial decisions about howto ensurethe harmonious development of that city and I want those decisions to be takenbyConservatives. The choice at the ne某t election is very simple –it’s betweenthe fool’s gold ofLabour gimmicks which we all understand, we’ve all fought beforeand a government that iswilling to take tough and sensible decisions, to cutunnecessary spending but to make the keyinvestments in transport andinfrastructure and housing and in our communities thatwill takethis countryforward. I know what I want as Mayor of the greatest city on earth, I think Iknowwhat you want, am I right? I know that we can do it so let’s go for itover the ne某t two years.Cut that yellow Liberal Democrat albatross from aroundour necks and let it plop into the sea, letit plop into the sea by workingflat out for David Cameron as Prime Minister and an outrightConservativevictory in 2019. Thank you very much, thank you everybody.。
英国脱欧首相的演讲稿
尊敬的英国国民,我今天站在这里,向您发表重要讲话。
我们都知道,英国脱
欧是一个重大的决定,它将深刻地影响着我们的国家和人民。
作为英国脱欧的首相,我深知这一决定的重要性,也深知我们面临的挑战和困难。
但是,我坚信,只要我们团结一致,共同努力,我们一定能够克服一切困难,迎接新的挑战。
首先,我要向全体英国国民保证,无论是支持脱欧还是反对脱欧,我们都是英
国人,我们都是同胞,我们都是一家人。
脱欧不会改变我们之间的关系,不会改变我们对祖国的热爱和对未来的期待。
无论我们的立场如何,我们都要团结在一起,共同为我们的国家和人民谋福祉。
其次,我要向全球发出一个信号,那就是英国是一个开放、包容、自信的国家。
我们尊重每一个国家和民族的选择,我们愿意与世界各国开展友好合作,共同应对全球性挑战。
英国脱欧并不意味着我们要与世界脱离联系,相反,我们将更加积极地参与国际事务,为世界和平与发展作出更大的贡献。
最后,我要向全体英国国民呼吁,让我们共同努力,共同建设一个更加美好的
英国。
无论是脱欧还是留欧,我们都要团结一致,共同面对未来的挑战。
我们要加强国内改革,推动经济发展,改善民生,为我们的子孙后代创造更好的生活条件。
在这个关键的时刻,让我们携起手来,共同迎接未来的挑战。
让我们展现出英
国人民的坚韧和勇气,让我们共同书写英国发展的新篇章。
谢谢大家!愿上帝保佑英国!。
2142018年36期总第424期ENGLISH ON CAMPUS人际功能在英美国家领导人就职演讲中的应用文/钱思颖【摘要】韩礼德的系统功能语法自问世以来就受到学者的广泛关注。
以韩礼德的人际功能理论为理论基础,选取自二十一世纪以来英美国家领导人的就职演讲为分析文本,利用定量分析和定性分析相结合的方法,分析英美国家领导人如何通过演讲实现自身所想传达的人际功能,以及英美国家领导人就职演讲的人际意义传达的不同特点:美国的三位领导人多选择中情态动词;英国的四位领导人几乎没有使用强情态动词;根据情态动词使用的原因进一步分析,认为以上语言现象是由英美文化差异造成的。
【关键词】就职演讲;人际功能;情态;语气【作者简介】钱思颖(1995-),女,汉族,四川成都人,电子科技大学外国语学院,电子科技大学硕士研究生,研究方向:外国语言学。
引言国家领导人的选举一直是颇受人们关注的重大历史事件。
关于各个国家领导人的政治演讲研究不在少数。
系统功能语法本身的内涵意义和理论内容十分丰富,涉及面太广容易造成论文对理论的分析缺少深度。
然而这种具有政治意义的公开演讲文本本身具有很高的研究价值。
一、韩礼德的系统功能语法观“语言是社会活动的产物,作为人类交际的工具,它承担着各种各样的功能。
”系统功能学派认为语言包括系统语法和功能语法两个部分,两者相互结合和搭配,一道实现说话者为语言所赋予的意义。
二、人际功能的实现语言的人际功能是讲话者作为对参与者的“意义潜势”,是语言的参与功能。
“人际意义指语言除了传递信息之外还有表达讲话者身份、地位、态度、动机等功能。
”“人际意义的重要组成部分之一是讲话者对自己讲的命题的成功性和有效性所作的判断,或在命令中要求对方承担的义务,或在提议中表达个人的意愿,人际意义的这一部分正是由情态系统来实现的。
”1.情态系统。
“情态动词是情态意义实现的最典型的使用情况。
”情态能够揭示语篇的意识形态意义。
与此同时,“情态能够表现作者或者说话者的‘态度’或者‘评价’。
英美领导人就职演讲中人际功能实现的差异性领导人就职演讲是展示一个国家或地区新任领导人愿景和政策的重要场合。
尽管英美两国都属于西方国家,但两国领导人就职演讲中实现人际功能的方式和差异具有显著性。
首先,英美领导人就职演讲中的人际功能呈现出语言风格的差异。
英国领导人在就职演讲中通常采用正式和庄重的口吻,使用文辞华丽的英语表达,强调传统价值和尊重。
英国首相鲍里斯·约翰逊在2024年就职演讲中表示:“我们将维护尊重个体和个人自由的原则。
”通过这种方式,英国领导人试图取得人际关系上的共鸣,强调其作为国家领导者的权威和威望。
相比之下,美国领导人的演讲风格更加直接和亲民。
美国总统在就职演讲中通常采用口语化的语言和简洁明了的句子,强调平等和人权。
例如,前美国总统巴拉克·奥巴马在2024年的就职演讲中说道:“我们全体美国人民,而不是少数掌权者,将塑造这个国家的命运。
”通过这种方式,美国领导人试图与普通民众建立情感上的共鸣,强调其作为民主国家领导者的代表性和亲和力。
其次,英美领导人在就职演讲中实现人际功能的侧重点不同。
英国领导人在就职演讲中更加注重展示个人魅力和权威,着重强调国家的传统和文化。
例如,英国首相鲍里斯·约翰逊在2024年就职演讲中谈到英国的“丰富历史”和“伟大传统”,以及英国人对国家的热爱和忠诚。
通过这种方式,英国领导人试图建立与国家历史和传统的连接,并加强对国家领导者的信任和支持。
总结起来,尽管英美两国都属于西方国家,但英美领导人就职演讲中的人际功能实现方式存在显著差异。
这种差异体现在语言风格、侧重点和目标上。
英国领导人更加强调个人权威和国家传统,美国领导人更加注重亲民和平等的表达。
了解和分析这些差异有助于我们更好地理解和解读英美两国领导人的演讲。
英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊就职讲话人际意义研究
英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊的就职讲话在国内外引起了广泛关注。
许多人纷纷对这次演讲进行了解读,并对其可能产生的影响进行了分析。
本文将对鲍里斯约翰逊就职讲话的人际意义进行研究。
鲍里斯约翰逊的就职讲话表达了他对国家和人民的责任感和使命感。
他多次提到“为国家和人民服务”的重要性,并呼吁大家共同努力,建设一个更加繁荣和团结的英国。
这种表态是对他作为首相的责任和使命的体现,也是对国家和人民的承诺。
这种表态不仅可以树立他的权威和领导力,还可以赢得选民的支持和信任。
鲍里斯约翰逊的就职讲话着重强调了团结和合作的重要性。
他提到了“团结”的次数很多,并强调只有团结起来才能应对国内外的挑战。
这种强调不仅可以拉近他和其他政治派别的距离,也可以强调他的领导地位,并将各方力量凝聚在他的周围,共同为国家的繁荣而努力。
鲍里斯约翰逊的就职讲话中还涉及了对外政策和国内改革的承诺。
他表示将“重新定义国家的地位”和“优化经济和社会体制”,并承诺加强对教育和医疗系统的投资,改善国家的基础设施等。
这些承诺可以说是对选民们的诉求的回应,也是对国家未来发展的设想。
通过这样的承诺,鲍里斯约翰逊可以赢得选民的信任,同时也向国际社会展示了他作为首相的决心和能力。
鲍里斯约翰逊在就职讲话中还表达了他对过去政府在某些问题上的不满和对改革的渴望。
他提到了英国脱欧问题,并表示他将致力于实现“脱欧”的承诺。
这种表态可以说是对之前政府的批评,也是对选民们期望的回应。
通过这种表态,鲍里斯约翰逊可以赢得选民的认同和支持,同时也可以让选民们对他的改革计划产生信心。
英国首相鲍里斯约翰逊就职讲话人际意义研究
自从在2019年7月23日接替特蕾莎·梅成为英国首相后,鲍里斯·约翰逊一直备受关注。
他的就任演讲也备受外界关注和评论。
在这篇文章里,我们将探讨他的就职演讲在人际意义方面的研究。
人际意义是指言语或行动背后的潜在含义。
每个人的话语或行动都有自己的目的和意图,也可能会产生有意或无意的影响。
因此,了解一个人的人际意义可以帮助我们更好地理解他们的意图和行为,并在沟通上更加顺畅。
鲍里斯·约翰逊的演讲让人们感受到他想要传达的信息是什么以及他为什么要成为首相。
在演讲中,他强调了承诺和信任的重要性,同时也提到了他希望利用自己的领导力和决心来推动英国的发展。
这种强调承诺和信任的语言,可以看作是约翰逊试图建立他的公众形象并争取人们的信任。
在过去,他可能受到一些批评,因为他的言行类似于政治游说,缺乏实际的承诺和明确的领导原则。
然而,在他的演讲中,他明确表达了他在担任首相期间要关注的几个重要议题,包括改善国家医疗保健系统、加强教育、实现英国的脱欧等等。
除此之外,约翰逊还使用了一些富有感染力的措辞,例如“让我们现在就开始吧”、“给我们杠杆和机会,我们就会把英国变得更好”。
这些表达展示了他在政府领导方面的积极性和魄力,带来了一种强烈的行动主义的感觉。
他还强调了团结的重要性,表示将与所有人建立联系和信任。
总而言之,鲍里斯·约翰逊的就职演讲凸显了他试图建立的公众形象和想要传达的几个信息。
他试图建立一个具有领导力和信任的公众形象,并承诺要将重点放在英国国内的几个关键议题上。
在表达这些方面,他使用了富有感染力的语言,旨在吸引公众的支持和信任,并通过团结人们实现国家的发展。
总之,理解鲍里斯·约翰逊的人际意义可以帮助我们更好地理解他的言行和行为,并在政治沟通上更加顺畅。