5-The effects of agricultural practice and land-use on the distribution and
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:582.68 KB
- 文档页数:11
全球气候变化对粮食生产的影响与适应考研英语作文范文The Impact of Global Climate Change on Food Production and AdaptationIn recent years, global climate change has become a pressing issue that poses significant challenges to food production worldwide. The adverse effects of the changing climate, including rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events, are already being witnessed in various regions around the globe. This essay aims to explore the impact of global climate change on food production and discuss potential strategies for adaptation.Firstly, rising temperatures have a direct impact on crop yields. High temperatures can lead to heat stress in plants,negatively affecting their growth and productivity. Crops such as wheat, maize, and rice are particularly vulnerable to temperature extremes. Studies have shown that a 1-degree Celsius increase in temperature during the growing season can result in a decline of 3-5% in wheat and rice yields. As global temperatures continue to rise, it is expected that crop productivity will be significantly reduced, leading to potential food shortages.Secondly, altered precipitation patterns due to climate change also pose challenges to food production. Some regions may experience increased rainfall, leading to waterlogging, soil erosion, and increased incidence of pests and diseases. On the other hand, other areas may face droughts and reduced water supplies, affecting crop growth and yield. For example, in regions heavily dependent on rainfall for agriculture, such as sub-Saharan Africa, decreased precipitation could lead to crop failures and increased food insecurity.Furthermore, global climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, typhoons, and floods. These events can cause significant damage to crops, livestock, and infrastructure, disrupting food production and distribution systems. In addition to physical damage, extreme weather events can also result in post-harvest losses and increased food waste due to transportation and storage difficulties. Consequently, the effects of these events can have long-lasting implications for food availability and accessibility.To adapt to the impact of global climate change on food production, various strategies can be employed. Firstly, there is a need for improved crop breeding and agronomic practices that enhance resilience and tolerance to higher temperatures and altered precipitation patterns. Research and development in drought-tolerant and heat-tolerant crop varieties can help mitigate the adverse effects of climate change on yields.Furthermore, investment in irrigation infrastructure and water management technologies is crucial to ensure water availability for agriculture, particularly in regions proneto droughts. Drip irrigation, rainwater harvesting systems, and improved water storage facilities can contribute to more efficient water use and reduce dependence on rainfall.Additionally, promoting sustainable and climate-smart agricultural practices can help enhance resilience and minimize greenhouse gas emissions. Practices such as conservation agriculture, agroforestry, and organic farming can improve soil health, reduce soil erosion, and enhance carbon sequestration. Moreover, adopting precision farming techniques that utilize data and technology to optimize crop management can improve resource efficiency and reduce environmental impacts.Lastly, strengthening global cooperation and implementing international policies to combat climate change are essential.Countries need to work together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, promote renewable energy sources, and adapt to the consequences of climate change. International collaborations can provide support for developing countries in implementing adaptation strategies and ensure equitable access to resources and expertise.In conclusion, global climate change poses significant challenges to food production due to rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events. These impacts have the potential to result in reduced crop yields, food shortages, and increased food insecurity. However, through the adoption of adaptation strategies such as improved crop varieties, water management techniques, sustainable agricultural practices, and global cooperation, it is possible to mitigate the effects of climate change and ensure food security for future generations.。
英语作文-农业科学研究和试验发展行业的农业绿色发展与农产品可追溯体系研究Agricultural green development and the traceability system of agricultural products are crucial aspects of the agricultural science research and experimental development industry. These areas play pivotal roles in ensuring sustainable practices and enhancing product quality and safety.Agricultural green development focuses on promoting environmentally friendly practices within the agricultural sector. This includes minimizing the use of chemical inputs, adopting organic farming methods, and implementing sustainable agricultural techniques. By reducing the environmental impact of agriculture, such practices help preserve natural resources, protect biodiversity, and mitigate climate change effects.Key initiatives in agricultural green development include integrated pest management (IPM), which emphasizes biological control methods and reduced pesticide use. IPM strategies involve monitoring pest populations, using natural predators, and employing crop rotation to maintain soil health and fertility. Additionally, precision agriculture utilizes technology such as GPS-guided machinery and remote sensing to optimize resource use and increase farm efficiency.Moreover, the development of sustainable farming systems like agroforestry and conservation agriculture contributes to agricultural green development. Agroforestry integrates trees and shrubs into agricultural landscapes to provide ecological benefits such as soil erosion control, nutrient cycling, and habitat for beneficial organisms. Conservation agriculture promotes minimal soil disturbance, permanent soil cover with crop residues, and diversified crop rotations, enhancing soil health and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.Parallel to agricultural green development is the establishment of agricultural product traceability systems. These systems enable the tracking and tracing of products throughout the supply chain—from production and processing to distribution andconsumption. Traceability ensures transparency and accountability, which are critical for food safety, quality assurance, and market access.The implementation of agricultural product traceability involves the use of technologies such as barcode labeling, RFID (Radio Frequency Identification), and blockchain. These technologies enable real-time data collection and information sharing, facilitating quick response measures in case of food safety incidents or quality issues. By enhancing traceability, stakeholders can identify the origin of agricultural products, monitor production processes, and verify compliance with regulations and standards.Furthermore, traceability systems support consumer confidence by providing accurate information about product attributes, such as organic certification, geographical indication, and production methods. Consumers increasingly value transparency and sustainability in food production, making traceability systems essential for market competitiveness and consumer trust.In conclusion, agricultural green development and agricultural product traceability systems are integral to advancing sustainability and quality in the agricultural sector. These initiatives promote resource efficiency, environmental stewardship, and market integrity, thereby fostering a resilient and responsible agricultural industry. By embracing innovative practices and robust traceability measures, stakeholders can collectively work towards a more sustainable and transparent food system, meeting the demands of today without compromising the needs of future generations.。
agricultural practice摘要:1.农业实践的定义与意义2.我国农业实践的历史与发展3.现代农业实践的技术与方法4.农业实践在我国经济和社会发展中的作用5.农业实践所面临的挑战与未来发展正文:农业实践是指人类在农业生产过程中,运用各种知识、技能和经验进行的一系列实践活动。
它具有悠久的历史,对于保障粮食安全、维护生态平衡、促进社会稳定和推动经济发展具有重要意义。
我国农业实践历史悠久,可以追溯到新石器时代。
几千年的发展过程中,我国农民积累了丰富的农业经验,培育了众多的农作物品种,发明了许多农业生产工具。
进入现代社会,我国农业实践在坚持传统农业生产方式的同时,不断引进、消化、吸收现代农业技术,逐步实现现代化。
现代农业实践运用现代科学技术,采用良种、良法、良田、良机等综合措施,提高农业生产效率,降低生产成本,增加农业产值。
其中包括精准农业、生态农业、绿色农业、设施农业等多种技术和方法。
农业实践在我国经济和社会发展中的作用举足轻重。
首先,农业实践是保障国家粮食安全的基础。
我国人口众多,粮食需求量大,只有通过不断提高农业生产力,才能满足人们的基本需求。
其次,农业实践是维护生态平衡的关键。
农业生产活动与生态环境密切相关,合理的农业实践有利于保护自然资源,实现可持续发展。
最后,农业实践为农村经济发展和农民增收提供了支撑。
农业产业链条长,农业实践可以促进农村产业结构调整,带动农民就业,增加农民收入。
然而,农业实践在发展过程中也面临着诸多挑战。
如农业生产资源日益紧张,农业生态环境恶化,农业生产成本上升,农村劳动力流失等。
为了应对这些挑战,我国需要进一步推进农业现代化,提高农业科技创新能力,加大对农业的支持力度,培养新型职业农民,促进农业可持续发展。
总之,农业实践是人类社会发展的基石,我国农业实践在历史长河中不断发展壮大。
农学英语作文模板高中农学英语作文模板高中。
农业是人类社会发展的基础,农学作为研究农业生产和农业经济的学科,对于高中生来说是一个重要的学科。
在学习农学英语的过程中,我们不仅要掌握农学的基本知识,还要学会用英语来表达农业生产和农业科技的发展。
下面是一篇农学英语作文模板,供大家参考。
农学英语作文模板。
Title: The Importance of Agricultural Science。
Introduction:Agricultural science is a branch of science that deals with the study of agriculture and its related fields. It encompasses a wide range of topics including crop production, animal husbandry, soil science, agricultural economics, and agricultural engineering. In recent years, agricultural science has become increasingly important as the world faces the challenges of feeding a growing population, preserving natural resources, and mitigating the effects of climate change.Body:1. The role of agricultural science in feeding the world。
Agricultural science plays a crucial role in ensuring food security for the global population. Through the development of new crop varieties, improved farming techniques, and sustainable agricultural practices, agricultural scientists are able to increase crop yields and improve the quality of food production.2. The importance of agricultural science in preserving natural resources。
全球气候变化对农业生产的影响与适应考研英语作文范文Climate Change and Its Impact on Agricultural Production Climate change has emerged as one of the most pressing challenges facing our planet today. Its impact onagricultural production is significant and far-reaching, necessitating urgent action and adaptive strategies. This essay will discuss the various ways in which global climate change affects agricultural productivity and explorepotential solutions to mitigate its adverse effects.Firstly, rising temperatures due to climate change have profound implications for agricultural systems. Heat stress can reduce crop yields, particularly for heat-sensitive crops such as wheat and rice. Increased temperatures alsocontribute to the spread of pests and diseases, furtherendangering agricultural productivity. Moreover, extreme heat events can lead to livestock deaths and decreased milk and meat production. These adverse effects put food security and livelihoods at risk, particularly in regions dependent on agriculture.Secondly, altered precipitation patterns resulting from climate change pose another major challenge for agriculture. Changes in rainfall timing, frequency, and intensity can disrupt planting and harvesting schedules, affecting crop growth and yields. Droughts, often exacerbated by climate change, reduce soil moisture and hinder plant growth, leading to crop failures. Conversely, heavy precipitation events can cause waterlogging and soil erosion, damaging crops and causing nutrient depletion. These unpredictable rainfall patterns increase the vulnerability of agricultural systems and exacerbate food insecurity.Furthermore, climate change impacts the availability and quality of water resources, essential for agricultural irrigation. Melting glaciers and shifting rainfall patterns affect the quantity of available water, leading to water scarcity in many regions. This scarcity is exacerbated by increased evaporation rates due to higher temperatures. Additionally, rising temperatures contribute to the degradation of water quality, affecting soil fertility and crop health. These challenges necessitate innovative water management strategies and investments in efficient irrigation technologies.Another significant consequence of climate change for agriculture is the risk of increased extreme weather events. More frequent and intense hurricanes, cyclones, and storms can cause widespread destruction of crops, buildings, and infrastructure. Flooding, accompanied by soil erosion, destroys fertile topsoil and reduces agriculturalproductivity in affected areas. Similarly, heatwaves anddroughts can lead to forest fires, damaging land and crops. Building resilience through improved disaster risk management, early warning systems, and robust infrastructure is crucialfor enabling farmers to adapt to the changing climate.To adapt to the challenges posed by climate change, farmers and policymakers must embrace sustainableagricultural practices. Implementing climate-smartagriculture techniques, such as conservation tillage, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, can enhance resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, promoting crop diversification and breeding climate-resilient varieties can help mitigate the effects of extreme weather conditions. Developing climate information services and providing financial support and capacity-buildingopportunities for farmers is also essential.In conclusion, climate change significantly impacts agricultural production through increased temperatures,altered precipitation patterns, water scarcity, and extreme weather events. Addressing these challenges requires a combination of mitigation and adaptation efforts. Sustainable agricultural practices, crop diversification, and the development of climate-resilient varieties are crucial. Additionally, investing in water management strategies and disaster risk reduction measures is necessary for building resilience in agricultural systems. By taking proactive measures, we can safeguard food security and livelihoods in the face of a changing climate.。
环境科学与工程英文文献Environmental Science and EngineeringEnvironmental science and engineering is an interdisciplinary field that combines knowledge from various scientific disciplines to understand and address environmental issues. It encompasses the study of the natural environment, the built environment, and the interactions between them.One key aspect of environmental science and engineering is the study of air pollution. Air pollution refers to the presence of harmful substances in the air, which can have detrimental effects on human health and the environment. Research in this area focuses on identifying sources of air pollution, measuring air quality, and developing strategies to mitigate pollution. For example, studies may investigate the impact of industrial emissions on air quality in urban areas and propose technologies to reduce pollutant emissions.Water pollution is another important concern for environmental scientists and engineers. Water pollution occurs when harmful substances contaminate water bodies, making it unsafe for use or threatening the survival of aquatic organisms. Research in this area may involve studying the effects of agricultural runoff on water quality or developing technologies for wastewater treatment. Additionally, researchers may explore the impacts of climate change on water availability and quality.Environmental scientists and engineers are also involved in the field of waste management. This includes the study of wastegeneration, collection, and disposal methods. Researchers may investigate the environmental impact of different waste management practices and evaluate the efficacy of recycling and waste reduction programs. Innovative approaches, such as waste-to-energy technologies, may be explored to minimize the environmental impact of waste disposal.Another area of focus in environmental science and engineering is the study of renewable energy sources. With the increasing demand for energy and the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, researchers are exploring alternative energy options. This may involve studying the efficiency and environmental impacts of solar, wind, and biomass energy systems. Additionally, researchers may investigate the feasibility of energy storage technologies to ensure a reliable and sustainable energy supply. Overall, environmental science and engineering play a crucial role in understanding and addressing environmental challenges. By combining scientific knowledge and engineering principles, researchers aim to protect and preserve the natural environment for current and future generations. The application of innovative technologies and the development of sustainable practices are essential for promoting a clean and healthy environment.。
如何把艺术融入农资专业英语作文The integration of art into the field of agricultural resources is a fascinating and multifaceted concept that holds immense potential for enriching both the academic and practical realms of this discipline. As the world grapples with the pressing challenges of sustainable food production, environmental conservation, and the ever-evolving needs of modern agriculture, the incorporation of artistic elements can serve as a powerful catalyst for innovation, communication, and holistic understanding.At the core of this endeavor lies the recognition that agriculture is not merely a technical pursuit but a complex interplay of natural systems, human ingenuity, and cultural expression. By embracing the creative and emotive dimensions of art, agricultural professionals can unlock new avenues for problem-solving, knowledge dissemination, and community engagement.One of the primary ways in which art can be integrated into agricultural resources is through the visual representation of data and information. The field of data visualization has long beenrecognized as a powerful tool for communicating complex scientific and technical concepts to diverse audiences. By employing artistic techniques such as infographics, interactive displays, and data-driven installations, agricultural researchers and educators can effectively convey the nuances of soil composition, crop yields, weather patterns, and other crucial data points in a captivating and accessible manner.Moreover, the integration of art can enhance the aesthetic appeal and user experience of agricultural resources, making them more engaging and memorable for learners and practitioners. The design of educational materials, such as textbooks, online courses, and interactive exhibits, can incorporate elements of graphic design, typography, and multimedia to create a visually compelling and immersive learning environment. This approach not only captures the attention of the audience but also fosters a deeper emotional connection with the subject matter, ultimately enhancing knowledge retention and fostering a greater appreciation for the complexities of agricultural systems.Beyond the realm of visual representation, the incorporation of art can also manifest in the realm of storytelling and narrative-building. Agricultural professionals can harness the power of creative writing, poetry, and even performative arts to convey the human narratives that underpin the industry. By sharing the personal experiences,challenges, and triumphs of farmers, researchers, and other stakeholders, these artistic expressions can humanize the technical aspects of agriculture, fostering empathy, understanding, and a sense of shared purpose among diverse stakeholders.Furthermore, the integration of art can serve as a bridge between agricultural practices and community engagement. Public art installations, interactive murals, and community-based projects can bring the intricacies of agricultural systems to the forefront of public consciousness, sparking conversations and inspiring collective action towards sustainable and equitable food production. These artistic interventions can also serve as platforms for cultural exchange, where traditional agricultural practices and local knowledge are celebrated and preserved, further enriching the tapestry of agricultural resources.The potential for integrating art into agricultural resources extends beyond the confines of academic and professional domains. By fostering collaborations between artists, farmers, and agricultural scientists, new avenues for cross-pollination and interdisciplinary innovation can emerge. These collaborative efforts can give rise to novel approaches to sustainable land management, innovative product design, and the development of immersive educational experiences that captivate and inspire the next generation of agricultural stewards.In conclusion, the integration of art into agricultural resources is a multifaceted and transformative endeavor that holds immense promise for the future of this vital industry. By embracing the creative and emotive dimensions of art, agricultural professionals can enhance communication, foster community engagement, and drive innovation in the pursuit of sustainable and equitable food systems. As we navigate the complexities of modern agriculture, the strategic incorporation of artistic elements can serve as a powerful tool for cultivating a deeper understanding, appreciation, and stewardship of the natural world upon which we all depend.。
中国生态农业学报(中英文) 2024年1月 第 32 卷 第 1 期Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, Jan. 2024, 32(1): 53−60DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230429郑玉婷, 黄鑫慧, 李浩, 王彪, 李攀锋, 崔吉晓, 隋鹏, 高旺盛, 陈源泉. 有机和常规管理对茶园土壤固碳的影响−以林地为对照[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2024, 32(1): 53−60ZHENG Y T, HUANG X H, LI H, WANG B, LI P F, CUI J X, SUI P, GAO W S, CHEN Y Q. Effects of organic and conventional management on soil carbon sequestration in tea gardens: comparison with forest land[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 32(1): 53−60有机和常规管理对茶园土壤固碳的影响*−以林地为对照郑玉婷1, 黄鑫慧1, 李 浩1, 王 彪1, 李攀锋1, 崔吉晓2, 隋 鹏1, 高旺盛1,陈源泉1**(1. 中国农业大学农学院 北京 100193; 2. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所 北京 100083)摘 要: 为探究有机和常规管理方式对茶园土壤有机碳的影响, 选择云南省普洱市思茅区常规管理茶园、有机管理茶园和附近自然林地3种典型土地利用类型, 通过测定0~20 cm和20~40 cm土层的土壤有机碳(SOC)、易氧化有机碳(EOC)、非活性有机碳(NLOC)、颗粒态有机碳(POC)和矿物结合态有机碳(MOC)含量, 计算土壤各组分有机碳的分配比例以及土壤碳库管理指数(CPMI), 研究3种土地利用方式下土壤有机碳各组分含量和质量的变化特征。
Promoting Sustainable Agriculture Practices Sustainable agriculture practices are essential for the health of our planet. Agriculture is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution, and deforestation. The world population is increasing, and the demand for food is rising. Therefore, it is crucial to promote sustainable agriculture practices to ensure food security and protect the environment.One of the most significant challenges facing agriculture is climate change. Climate change is causing extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and heatwaves, which are affecting crop yields. Sustainable agriculture practices can help mitigate the impact of climate change on agriculture. For example, farmers can adopt conservation tillage, which involves leaving crop residue on the soil surface. This practice reduces soil erosion and improves soil health, which helps crops withstand extreme weather events.Another sustainable agriculture practice is crop rotation. Crop rotation involves growing different crops in the same field in a specific sequence. This practice helps to reduce soil erosion, improve soil health, and reduce pest and disease pressure. Crop rotation also helps to conserve water, reduce fertilizer use, and increase crop yields.Sustainable agriculture practices also involve the use of natural resources in a responsible and efficient manner. For example, farmers can use drip irrigation instead of flood irrigation. Drip irrigation delivers water directly to the roots of plants, reducing water waste and increasing crop yields. Farmers can also use organic fertilizers, which are made from natural sources such as compost and manure. Organic fertilizers improve soil health, reduce water pollution, and increase crop yields.Promoting sustainable agriculture practices requires the involvement of multiple stakeholders. Governments can provide incentives to farmers to adopt sustainable agriculture practices. For example, governments can offer tax breaks or subsidies to farmers who adopt conservation tillage or crop rotation. Governments can also invest in research and development of sustainable agriculture practices.Consumers also play a crucial role in promoting sustainable agriculture practices. Consumers can choose to buy food from farmers who use sustainable agriculture practices. By doing so, consumers can support sustainable agriculture and encourage farmers to adopt sustainable practices.In conclusion, promoting sustainable agriculture practices is essential for food security and environmental sustainability. Sustainable agriculture practices can help mitigate the impact of climate change on agriculture, conserve natural resources, and increase crop yields. Governments, farmers, and consumers all have a role to play in promoting sustainable agriculture practices. By working together, we can ensure a sustainable future for agriculture and the planet.。
农业可持续发展和环境保护英语作文Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental ProtectionThe world we live in today faces a multitude of challenges, and one of the most pressing issues is the need to balance the demands of a growing population with the preservation of our planet's delicate ecosystems. At the heart of this conundrum lies the critical role of agriculture, an industry that not only provides sustenance for billions but also has a profound impact on the environment.As the global population continues to rise, the demand for food production has escalated exponentially. Traditional agricultural practices, driven by the pursuit of higher yields and greater profitability, have often come at the expense of environmental sustainability. The overuse of chemical fertilizers, the depletion of soil nutrients, and the reliance on monoculture farming have all contributed to the degradation of our natural resources.However, the tide is turning, and a growing movement towards sustainable agriculture is gaining momentum. Sustainable agriculture is an approach that seeks to balance the need for food production with the preservation of the environment. This holistic approachrecognizes that the health of the land, the well-being of the people, and the prosperity of the economy are inextricably linked.One of the key principles of sustainable agriculture is the promotion of biodiversity. By encouraging a diversity of crops and livestock, farmers can create a more resilient and balanced ecosystem. This not only helps to maintain the natural balance of the land but also reduces the reliance on chemical inputs, which can have detrimental effects on the environment.Another crucial aspect of sustainable agriculture is the responsible management of water resources. In many regions, water scarcity is a pressing concern, and the overuse of irrigation has led to the depletion of groundwater reserves. Sustainable agriculture practices, such as the implementation of efficient irrigation systems and the use of drought-resistant crops, can help to conserve this precious resource.The role of organic farming in sustainable agriculture cannot be overstated. By eschewing the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, organic farmers are able to maintain the health and fertility of the soil, while also reducing the environmental impact of their practices. Furthermore, organic farming often relies on natural pest management techniques, such as the use of beneficial insects and the promotion of biodiversity, which can help to protect thedelicate balance of the ecosystem.In addition to the environmental benefits, sustainable agriculture also has the potential to improve the livelihoods of farmers and their communities. By adopting sustainable practices, farmers can reduce their reliance on costly inputs, such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides, and instead invest in the long-term health and productivity of their land. This, in turn, can lead to higher yields, greater economic stability, and improved food security for local communities.However, the transition to sustainable agriculture is not without its challenges. Farmers may face resistance from entrenched industry practices, and the initial investment required to implement sustainable practices can be daunting. Additionally, the lack of widespread education and awareness about the benefits of sustainable agriculture can hinder its widespread adoption.To address these challenges, a multifaceted approach is required. Governments and policymakers must play a crucial role in creating incentives and regulations that encourage the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. This can include the provision of subsidies, the implementation of stricter environmental regulations, and the investment in research and development to support the advancement of sustainable agriculture.Similarly, the private sector and civil society organizations must also play a vital role in promoting and supporting sustainable agriculture. Businesses can invest in sustainable supply chains, while non-profit organizations can work to educate and empower farmers to adopt more environmentally-friendly practices.Ultimately, the path to a more sustainable future lies in the delicate balance between the needs of a growing population and the preservation of our planet's natural resources. By embracing sustainable agriculture, we can not only ensure the long-term viability of our food production systems but also contribute to the overall health and well-being of our environment. It is a challenge that we must all face together, for the sake of our present and future generations.。
ORIGINAL ARTICLEThe effects of agricultural practice and land-use on the distribution and origin of some potentially toxic metals in the soils of Golestan province,IranNaser Hafezi Moghaddas •Hadi Hajizadeh Namaghi •Hadi Ghorbani •Behnaz DahrazmaReceived:6April 2011/Accepted:28May 2012/Published online:18July 2012ÓSpringer-Verlag 2012Abstract Soil samples were collected from the agricul-tural lands of Golestan province,north of Iran and analyzed for 24elements including eight toxic metals of As,Cd,Co,Cr,Cu,Pb,Se and Zn.Electrical conductivity,pH,organic matter,soil texture,calcium carbonate content as well as soil cation exchange capacity were also determined.The possible sources of metals are identified with multivariate analysis such as correlation analysis,principal component analysis (PCA),and cluster analysis.In addition,enrich-ment factors were used to quantitatively evaluate the influences of agricultural practice on metal loads to the surface soils.The PCA and cluster analysis studies revealed that natural geochemical background are the main source of most elements including Al,Co,Cr,Cs,Cu,Fe,K,Li,Ni,Pb,V and Zn in the arable soils of the province (more than 90%),however,those soils which have been developed on the mafic and metamorphic rocks were considerably contributed on metal concentration (43%).Calcium and Sr were constituents of calcareous rocks and Na and S were mainly controlled by saline soils in the north of the province.Loess deposits was also accounting for high levels of selenium concentration.Phosphorous was mostly related to application of P-fertilizers and organo-phosphate pesticides.The comparison of metal load andenrichment factor for dry and irrigated farmlands showed that Cd,Co,Pb,Se and Zn had higher concentrations in the irrigated lands where considerable amounts of agrochemi-cals had been applied.However,it also found that prox-imity of arable lands to urban and industrial areas resulted in higher Pb and Cd values in the irrigated agricultural sources relative to dry ones.Keywords Toxic metals ÁDistribution ÁLand-use ÁGolestan ÁIranIntroductionTrace elements are accumulated locally in soils due to weathering of rock minerals.Since trace elements are essential for plants,animals,and human,the adequate level of these elements would be necessary in all agricultural products.Apart from trace elements originating in parent materials and entering the soil through chemical weath-ering processes,soil toxic trace elements have also many anthropogenic sources (Mitsios and Danalatos 2006).The natural input of several heavy metals to soils due to ped-ogenic processes has been exceeded in some local areas by human input,even on a regional scale.In particular,agri-cultural soils can be a long-term sink for heavy metals (Mico et al.2006).Because some soils can have fertility levels that are out of balance,animal manures have his-torically been applied to soils as a fertilizer and to improve the soil’s physicochemical properties (Sistani and Novak 2006).However,agricultural activities and especially application of sewage sludge,manure,mineral fertilizers and pesticides also significantly contribute to the trace metal status of agroecosystems (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee 2007).N.Hafezi Moghaddas (&)ÁB.DahrazmaFaculty of Earth Sciences,Shahrood University of Technology,Shahrood,Irane-mail:nhafezi@shahroodut.ac.irH.Hajizadeh NamaghiSchool of Mining,Liaoning Technical University,Fuxin,China H.GhorbaniDepartment of Soil Sciences,Faculty of Agriculture,Shahrood University of Technology,Shahrood,IranEnviron Earth Sci (2013)68:487–497DOI 10.1007/s12665-012-1753-5The ever-growing world population requires intensive land use for the production of food,which includes repe-ated and heavy input of fertilizers,pesticides,and soil amendments(Bradl2005).A quantitative inventory of heavy metals input to agricultural soils is necessary to determine the scale and relative importance of different sources of metals,either deposited from the atmosphere or applied to farmlands(Nicholson et al.2003).Because trace metal accumulation in soils will probably have a long residence time,it is important to understand reasons for the accumulation and to determine soil factors controlling their mobility in the soil and more importantly their bioavail-ability to the plants.An understanding of these factors is critical for the development of physical or chemical remediation strategies or adjustments in manure manage-ment practice to reduce trace metal accumulation(Sistani and Novak2006).The behavior of heavy metals in soil can be different due to the variation in both physicochemical properties of the soil and the activities of soil organisms associated with land-use change(Bradl2004).The comparison of metal levels has been studied in a wide range of land types in/and agricultural lands(Luo et al.2007;Huang and Jin2008; Anguelov and Anguelova2009;Marzaioli et al.2010;Bai et al.2010;Acosta et al.2011).The present paper is trying to highlight the role and contribution of long-term agricultural practice on heavy metals distribution across the arable lands.Due to the presence of large arable lands,considerable amounts of fertilizers as well as pesticides are being used in the studied area,which could contain high amounts of potentially toxic elements.The objective of this work was to investigate the source of24elements emphasizing eight toxic metals, namely,As,Cd,Co,Cr,Cu,Pb,Se and Zn in agricultural soils of Golestan province.The physicochemical charac-teristics of soil were also examined in relation to the heavy metal concentrations.Afinal objective of this study was to determine if the concentration of selected metals has changed with land types to evaluate the effects of land-use in the irrigated and dry farmlands.Materials and methodsStudy area descriptionThe province of Golestan is located in the north of Iran and south of Caspian Sea.The surface area is over20,000km2 (approximately1.3%of the total area of Iran).The climate of province is variable;the southern part has a typical mountainous climate,the central and southwestern regions have a temperate Mediterranean climate,and the northern part is semiarid or arid.The absolute minimum daily temperature is-1.4°C and the maximum46.5°C.Annual rainfall ranges from250to700mm.The suitable climate, supply adequate amounts of water and therefore,appro-priate fertile lands results to extension of agricultural activities in the Golestan province(Fig.1).The total area under cultivation within the province is estimated at730 thousands hectares from which about33.4%is irrigated and remaining65.6is dry lands.Wheat,cotton and summer crops are the main products in Golestan and the area is one of the most important parts of the country due to extensive agricultural activities.Industries are also young and since soils are fertile in central parts of region,population has evenly distributed.This study has focused on arable lands in central parts of province where agricultural activities are dense.Other types of farming in other parts(north and south)are local and spars and have no any considerable affect on regional soil pollution of study area.The soil quality in central parts is influenced by geological materials from mountainous regions in south and vast eolian dry lands(loess deposits)in north.The main lithologic units in southern regions are igneous and metamorphic rocks while northern parts composed of vast thick loess deposits. Therefore,groundwater availability is restricted in northern dry lands.Rainfall and groundwater irrigation is much higher in southern and central parts of the province.Soil samplingSoil samples were collected from arable lands.A total of 198agricultural soil samples were collected at the depth of 0–30cm and18soil samples were also taken from the depth of100cm at the same time.The physicochemical parameters such as electrical conductivity(EC),pH, organic matter(OC)and soil texture were measured at Zaravand Lab Company,Mashhad,Iran.Among the sur-face soil samples,74samples were chosen from irrigated farmlands and46samples were selected from dry arable lands.The irrigated farmlands in this area usually are cultivated more than one times,then it is expected that irrigated farmlands have more contaminant bearing potential than dry lands due to higher applications of dif-ferent agrochemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides.It is also given higher priority to the areas with higher organic matter and clay contents as these two parameters serve as a sink to heavy metals.Therefore,more samples were chosen from these areas.Geographical positions of the selected agricultural samples are shown in Fig.2.Most of arable lands and irrigated agricultural soil samples are located in southern parts of the province while most dry ones have occurred in northern parts of the area.The selected samples were air-dried and sieved through a2-mm polyethylene sieve and ground tofine powder. Then heavy and trace metals in soils from138samplingFig.1The map of Golestan province showing arable landsFig.2Geographical position of sampling pointspoints(120samples from0to30cm and18samples from 1m depth)were analyzed using ICP method at LabWest Minerals Analysis Pty Ltd(an accredited Australian laboratory).Statistical analysisThe relationships of different heavy metals were deter-mined by calculating the correlation coefficients of all possible non-reciprocal metal pairs(28pairs),principal component analysis(PCA)and by the cluster analysis.The correlations between physicochemical properties and heavy and trace metals were carried out to determine the influ-ence of physicochemical parameters in terms of heavy metal distribution.Non-zero correlation coefficient with accompanying p B0.05is considered statistically signifi-cant at the95%confidence limit.PCA is used to reduce data and to extract a small number of latent factors for analyzing relationships among the elements(Wang et al. 2009).Prior to the PCA analysis,heavy metal concentra-tions were log-transferred to minimize the influence of high values.PCA was conducted using factor extraction with an eigenvalue[1after Varimax rotation using SPSS16.0 version for Windows.The presence of outliers in the dataset was determined using the Tukey(1977)box plot method.Results and discussionDescriptive statisticsBrief descriptive statistical data of measured soil parame-ters in the studied area are shown in Table1.Soil pH range is limited and varies from6.9to8.5with a mean value of 7.9±0.2.The agricultural soils in the west part of the province near coastal plains of Caspian Sea had slightly higher pH values.Such neutral soil reaction would limit metal mobility in soils.In general,organic matter contents are low in all soils and range from0.34to2.89%with a mean value of1.13±0.55%.OC in eastern parts of the study area has lower values(\1%)compared to central and western parts.Soil textures of the agricultural samples are mostly classified as clay,clay loam and silty clay loam (Fig.3).Electrical conductivity ranges from0.36dSm-1to 47.7dSm-1and have arithmetical mean of 3.69±5.8dSm-1.However,EC was low in most of the samples and only few higher values have measured in some samples in the north of study area.Cation exchange capacity (CEC)is varied and ranged from6.12Cmol(?)kg-1to 54.3Cmol(?)kg-1with a mean value of22.13±9.78 Cmol(?)kg-1.Central parts of the study area have greater CEC values.CaCO3is low in most of the samples and are ranged from 1.76to36.4%with a mean value of 16.73±7.2%.The greater CaCO3values have measured in some parts of the northern study area.Multivariate analysis approachesCorrelation matrixSome of heavy metals are significantly correlated with each other and with soil physicochemical properties.The degree of correlation for all possible non-reciprocal element pairs (28pairs)and their correlation coefficients were calculated after excluding statistically identified outliers and the results are presented in Table2.Cobalt is significantly and positively correlated with Cr(r=0.87),Cu(r=0.85) and Zn(r=75)with p B0.01.Chromium is significantly and positively correlated with Cu(r=0.88)and Zn(r=70) with p B0.01.Cupper is also significantly and positively correlated with Zn(r=0.80)with p B0.01.The relation-ships of As and Cd with Se is shown to be insignificant.The correlations(p B0.01)of selected metals with organic matter andfine fractions are rather more consid-erable than other parameters.The relationships of metals with other soil parameters are very poor or negatively correlated indicating respective role of soil organic carbons and clay contents in the distribution of toxic ck of correlation of CEC with most metals is possibly due to the absence of metals in the soil exchangeable phases.On the other hands,since the concentrations of major cations in the soils are normally much greater than heavy metals, then it seems that CEC tends to be more affected by those metals than potentially toxic metals.Principal component analysisPrincipal component analysis(PCA)is a dimension reduction technique that takes correlated attributes,or variables,and identifies orthogonal linear recombinations (PCs)of the attributes that summarize the principal sources of variability in the data(Officer et al.2004).PCA was used to quantify elements sources in agricultural soil samples.The obtained factors were rotated using a Varimax-normalized algorithm,which allows an easier interpretation of the principal component loadings and maximization of the variance explained by the extracted factors.Table3displays the factor loadings with a Varimax rotation,as well as the eigenvalues.Six prin-cipal components were extracted from the available dataset that explained a total variance of approximately 82.3%.Factor1is dominated by Al,Co,Cr,Cs,Cu,Fe,K,Li, Ni,Pb,V and Zn and accounts for42.9%of total variance. The distribution of these elements is mainly controlled bynatural parent materials.The higher loadings related to mafic and metamorphic rocks,which are dominant in the southern parts of the province and agricultural soils are directly affected by pedological processes of such rocks.Mico et al.(2006)is also believe that lithogenic factors are most important component in metal loads of agricultural soils of Alicante province in Spain.Factor 2is strongly associated with only Ca and Sr (10%of total variance).Both geochemical and biochem-ical characteristics of Sr are similar to those of Ca and geological occurrence of it,is associated mainly with cal-careous rocks (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee 2007).There are substantial carbonate rocks sources in the southern parts of the region.Therefore factor 2explains another natural source in the studied soils.Factor 3is responsible for 9.2%of the total element variables and indicated great correlation with Na and S.This factor is related to saline soils in the north of the area.The northern parts of Golestan province are extensively covered by old coastal plains composing silt and clay where agricultural practices are being performed in forms of dry farming.In general,PC1,PC2,and PC3in the rotated component matrix of the agricultural soils depicted the naturalTable 1Brief statistical data of soil metal concentrations and properties (metals in ppm)Soil parameters Minimum Maximum Mean SD Skewness Kurtosis As 3.5015.579.52 2.02-0.240.87Cd 0.0250.280.0670.056 1.37 1.37Co 7.2025.5013.22 3.20 1.25 2.58Cr 38.00110.061.5312.22 1.15 2.80Cu 11.5052.9023.62 6.58 1.40 3.67Pb 7.3021.8013.16 3.210.730.04Se 0.17 1.230.550.220.880.408Zn 41.90125.0070.6316.260.5730.264pH 6.98.57.90.22-1.31 3.85EC (dSm -1)0.3647.70 3.69 5.82 4.3928.29OC (%)0.34 2.89 1.130.55 1.07 1.25Clay (%)12.0064.0037.0810.7250.12-0.256CEC (Cmol(?)kg -1) 6.1254.3022.139.780.780.519CaCO 3(%)1.7636.4016.737.200.12-0.025Fig.3Soil samples textural classificationgeochemical associations of elements in soils derived from their parental materials.Factor 4is correlated very strongly with P and some-how to Se and explains 6.9%of the total variance.The higher loadings of phosphorus indicate increased elemental concentration due to application of phosphorus fertilizers as well as organophosphate pesticides in the agricultural soils of Golestan province.Selenium is probably originated by loess deposits in the area,which naturally has high concentration in soils of Golestan province (Hafezi Mog-haddas et al.2010;Semnani et al.2010).Factor 5is loaded with As and Mo and account for 6.8%.This factor source may be explained by contribu-tion of many sources but the probability of anthropogenic sources is more likely.Except for Ti and to less extent for Mg,no significant loading value was obtained for any variable of Factor 6,which is responsible for 6.5%of total variance.These two elements are indicative of erosion in some resistant igne-ous rocks,which exist in the southern parts of the province.Factor loadings are represented in binary diagrams (PC1vs.PC2,PC1vs.PC3and PC1vs.PC4)in Fig.4.It can be seen from these diagrams that most of the elements are related to parent materials like mafic and metamorphic rocks,sandstone and shales.Magnesium in the first and second components and Se in the third one are showing mixed sources.Cluster analysisIn order to discriminate distinct groups of studied elements as tracers of natural or anthropogenic source,a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on the 24elements of interest (Fig.5).The distance cluster represents the degree of association between elements.The lower value on the distance cluster is showing more significant for the association.A cluster analysis was applied to reorganize the datasets (samples)into homogenous groups based on their geo-chemical properties (Salonen and Korkka-Niemi 2007).Cluster tree of all element variables in soil was produced by the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and the Ward method (Fig.5).The method of Ward is the best per-forming hierarchical clustering method,and even performs well for observation clustering (Templ et al.2008).The produced cluster analysis is rather in good agreement with principal component analysis results.The following three groups can be identified:Group 1consisted of Al,V,K,Cs,Co,Fe,Zn,Li,Cr,Ni,Cu,Pb,Cd and Mn.The relationships within this group are very strong,and they are mainly controlled by geology.However,some subgroups of Al,V,K and Cs (felsic rocks),Co,Fe,Zn and Li (intermediate rocks),Cr,Ni,CuT a b l e 2C o r r e l a t i o n o f s o i l m e t a l s a n d s o i l p h y s i c o c h e m i c a l p r o p e r t i e sA sC dC oC rC uP bS eZ np HE C O CC l a yC E CC a C O 3A s1C d0.30**1C o0.27**0.38**1C r0.39**0.50**0.87**1C u0.33**0.51**0.85**0.88**1P b0.39**0.48**0.53**0.64**0.62**1S e0.120.130.32**0.31**0.27**0.24*1Z n0.26**0.56**0.75**0.70**0.80**0.67**0.39**1p H-0.10-0.06-0.20*-0.30**-0.21*-0.25**0.005-0.041E C-0.07-0.16-0.14-0.11-0.11-0.21*0.11-0.090.081O C0.30**0.29**0.39**0.43**0.37**0.39**0.56**0.42**-0.16-0.171C l a y0.31**0.37**0.58**0.70**0.47**0.57**0.34**0.57**-0.08-0.150.42**1C E C -0.150.150.010.060.080.33**0.060.06-0.16-0.25**0.19*0.121C a C O 30.08-0.03-0.07-0.04-0.09-0.180.23*0.040.19*0.070.170.02-0.44**1B o l d v a l u e s a r e s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i fic a n t *C o r r e l a t i o n i s s i g n i fic a n t a t 0.05c o n fid e n c e l i m i t**C o r r e l a t i o n i s s i g n i fic a n t a t 0.01c o n fid e n c e l i m i tand Pb(mafic rocks)and Cd and Mn(probably sandstone and shale interbedded with coal)could also be identified. The effects of anthropogenic sources for this group are poor.Group2comprised As,Mo,Ti,P and Se.These ele-ments have both natural and anthropogenic sources.This group is in close relationship with group1.Phosphorous is mostly originated from application of chemical fertilizers, pesticides or manure while other metals of this group (except Ti)are enriched by both sources.Group3consisted of Ca,Sr,Mg,Na and S.These elements are mainly enriched in saline soils in the north or limestone rocks in the south of the studied area.Effects of land-use in metal concentrationsBox plots were used to describe the difference between metal content of different groups.Box plots illustrating distributions of metals among samples collected from irrigated farmlands and dry farmlands are shown in Fig.6.It seems that the concentrations of two sample types are similar in two groups.Statistical analyses were carried out to see if there were differences in concentrations of heavy metals due to land-use type.A two-sample t test was conducted using the SPSS16.0Statistical Software to determine whether the difference between two datasets is statistically significant or not(Neupane and Roberts2009). This test compares mean and variance of the two datasets to determine a p value.Smaller p values indicate the greater probability of difference in mean and variance of the two datasets.In general,p B0.05is considered sta-tistically significant at the95%confidence limit.The two datasets of concentration of a heavy metal measured in different land-use were used to test whether the concen-tration of that particular metal is significantly different.The t test results for two groups are given in Table4.Co,Se and Zn are shown statistically different concen-trations in samples which were collected from irrigated farmlands and dry farmlands.All of them are enriched in the irrigated farmlands.The concentrations of other studiedTable3Values of the six extracted factor loadings for24elementsElements PC1PC2PC3PC4PC5PC6Al0.9620.0270.040.0230.082-0.105 As0.477-0.098-0.152-0.0260.6870.136 Ca-0.3250.861-0.0450.056-0.096-0.083 Cd0.5820.105-0.2470.1770.0950.082 Co0.848-0.219-0.0220.2830.2020.016 Cr0.934-0.1990.0440.0370.150.091 Cs0.837-0.0850.157-0.307-0.1520.168 Cu0.834-0.3440.0450.210.160.017 Fe0.836-0.123-0.0780.230.266-0.005 K0.8880.0380.125-0.021-0.1070.068 Li0.8650.1640.1480.070.11-0.182 Mg0.3550.3420.509-0.104-0.0890.507 Mn0.424-0.4450.0040.26-0.0920.347 Mo0.075-0.1090.1630.070.8860.067 Na0.0360.0360.91-0.0260.0710.049 Ni0.896-0.247-0.0050.1410.1530.08 P0.1720.101-0.0350.8650.0430.176 Pb0.708-0.37-0.2220.142-0.014-0.216 S-0.0470.0820.8930.0460.018-0.104 Se0.4020.1020.1410.5080.04-0.485 Sr0.0550.8790.2390.164-0.14-0.077 Ti-0.027-0.206-0.0420.1880.2350.850 V0.95-0.0140.0520.0060.1330.149 Zn0.867-0.093-0.0120.3870.023-0.117 Eigenvalue11.03 2.82 2.01 1.54 1.28 1.08 Variation(%)42.9109.2 6.9 6.8 6.5Bold values are statistically significantExtraction method:PCA,Rotation method:Varimax with Kaiser normalizationmetals (As,Cd,Co,Cr,Cu and Pb)are not statistically different.The significantly higher Co,Se and Zn contents in the samples of irrigated farmlands compared to the dry farmlands requires either a secondary anthropogenic source in the former or a depletion of naturally occurring of mentioned metals in the latter.Studying applied agro-chemicals in the region is showed that pesticides andmanures are not enriched with Co,Se and Zn.Therefore,geochemical background is the main source of difference in soil metal concentrations between two agricultural land types.Mafic rocks in the southern parts of the study area which most fertile soils are formed near them are seems to be a possible sources of Co and Zn and loess deposits which consists most arable lands of the study area,is accounted for higher values of Se.However,Yu et al.(2008)found that the main factor of accumulation of the heavy metal is lithological factor in arid agricultural areas while anthropogenic factors has major contribution in chemical properties of irrigated soils in central Gansu province,China.Enrichment factor (EF)The enrichment factor is the relative abundance of a chemical element in a soil compared to the reference matter.EFs are calculated based on different reference materials such as earth crust (Krishna and Govil 2008l;Kim and Kim 1998),local soil geochemical background (Acosta et al.2009;Yu et al.2008;Salvagio et al.2002etc.),eful environmental information that affectstheFig.4Loading plots of elements in agricultural soils (PC1vs.PC2,PC3andPC4)Fig.5Cluster tree of variables for agricultural soils (measure:pearson’s correlation coefficient;linkage method:ward)soil ecosystem owing to human activity can be extracted by studying and examining the relevant elemental concentra-tions and their changes from top-soil and sub-soil at each site(Liao et al.2007).The enrichment factor is defined as the concentration ratio of a given element and the nor-malizing element in the given sample divided by the same ratio in reference material as follows:EF=ðM=AlÞsample ðM/Al)referencewhere EF is Enrichment factor,(M/Al)sample is the metal to Al ratio in the sample of interest;(M/Al)reference is the reference value of metal to Al ratio.References materials are related to average concentration of18samples col-lected from1m depth of arable lands.Aluminum has been used as normalizing element.Metal concentrations can be normalized to other factors,which are measured in the same sample(Cooke and Drury1998).Deeper horizon samples are close to natural background and parent material characteristic in the region and any exceeding values in the surface could be considered as a sign of anthropogenic contamination,mainly resulted from agri-cultural practices.Box plot diagrams(Fig.7)were used to show general assessment of samples from surface enrich-ment point of view and also in comparison EF values between samples collected from irrigated and dry farm-lands(Fig7).The comparison of these two types of sam-ples can clarify if application of agrochemicals and soil amendment can affect metal concentrations in the surface soils of the study area.EF values greater than one indicates some enrichment corresponding mainly to anthropogenic effects;whereas an EF value less than one means deple-tion.Figure7shows that EF values for Cd,Pb and Se in most of the samples are higher than other metals whereas EF for Co is least among the studied metals.Although natural background of study area has high levels of Cd and Pb,however,high EF values for these two metals relative to deeper horizons could be due to addition of suchmetals Fig.6Box plots depicting distributions of toxic metals between two agricultural land-usesfrom anthropogenic sources such as fertilizers and pesti-cides.The major sources of Cd pollution are atmospheric deposition and P-fertilizers(Kabata-Pendias and Mukher-jee2007).Wei and Yang(2009)also believe that Cd in agricultural soils of China is mainly originated from fer-tilizers and pesticides.Phosphorous fertilizers are applied more to the irrigated farmlands.The close proximity of arable lands to urban and industrial areas could account for higher Pb and Cd values in the irrigated agricultural sources particularly for farmlands.Elevated EF values for Se are probably due toflux from natural sources in the region.As mentioned before,high levels of Se have been observed in loess deposits of Golestan province,which have close associations with arable lands in the studied area.However,samples of irrigated soils were slightly more enriched than dry ones.The lower values for Co are also related to their natural sources.Mafic and metamorphic rocks in the southern parts of the province are considerably enriched with Co.Therefore,its concentration is less in surface horizons compared to deeper samples.EF values for As,Cr,Cu and Zn are near to1indicating natural enrich-ment for these metals in the agricultural soils of Golestan province.There is also no significant difference for EF values mentioned metals between samples collected from irrigated and dry farmland indicating dominance of natural background of studied soils for these metals. ConclusionThis study also elucidated heavy metal contents and their possible sources in the agricultural soils of Golestan province.The results from this study indicate that,con-centrations of heavy metals in agricultural soils are mostly comparable with natural geochemical background of the study area,especially for Al,Ca,Co,Cr,Cs,Cu,Fe,K,Li, Ni,S,Sr,V and Zn while concentration of As,Cd,Mo,P, Pb and Se is controlled both by pedogenic as well as agricultural factors.It is also found that Cd,Pb and Se in most of the samples are more enriched in the surface soils. This study suggested that Cd,Pb and Se are more likely to accumulate in the surface horizons by anthropogenic sources mainly atmospheric deposition near urban areas. Selenium is extensively derived from loess deposits of Golestan province so natural background in the top layers is the main source to supply Se.The results demonstrated that among toxic metals,concentration of Co,Se and Zn in the soil samples collected from irrigated farmland is sta-tistically higher than samples collected from dry farming areas.But such increase is not completely related to agrochemicals and soil amendments which are typically used more in irrigated farmlands.Geochemical background of most fertile soils has occurred in areas with higher natural concentrations of the mentioned elements. Acknowledgments This work is part of the comprehensive project entitled‘Soil Contamination Atlas of Golestan province’,which is funded by the Iran Department of Environment.The authors are thankful for thefinancial support to this project.ReferencesAcosta JA,Faz Cano A,Arocena JM,Debela F,Martı´nez-Martı´nez S (2009)Distribution of metals in soil particle size fractions and its implication to risk assessment of playgrounds in Murcia City (Spain).Geoderma149:101–109Table4Two-sample t test result showing significant variation in concentration at p\0.05Metal Type Mean SD p valueAs I9.34 2.260.186D9.81 1.56Cd I0.0710.050.315D0.0610.06Co I14.03 4.540.035D12.47 2.53Cr I63.6517.040.198D60.099.63Cu I24.237.140.201D22.64 5.49Pb I13.35 3.220.414D12.85 3.21Se I0.640.310.001D0.470.19Zn I73.6015.800.011D65.8616.02Bold values are statistically significantI irrigated farmlandD dryfarmlandFig.7Enrichment factors(EFs)of samples collected from irrigated farmlands(I)and dry farmlands(D)of agricultural soils in Golestan province。