六级暑假阅读词汇基础讲义【第一课:词汇部分】concoct vt.捏造;混合而制dual-core processor双核处理器octet processorinterface n.界面octopus八爪鱼decade n.十年decent adj.得体的;相当好的indecent adj.下流的;不礼貌的pocket n.口袋;钱vt.隐藏;忍受specification n.规格;说明书;详述laptop n.膝上型轻便电脑,笔记本电脑application n.应用,申请,志愿书,应用程序n.[计]应用,应用程序device n.装置,设计,设备plug n.塞子,栓,插头vt.插入,塞住,接插头vi.被塞住wireless n.无线电 a.无线的,无线电的expand vt./vi.使膨胀,详述,扩张incident n.事件,事变incidence n.发生率;影响;incidentally adv.伴随地,偶然,顺便Millennials n.千禧世代;千禧一代proverbial a.谚语的,谚语式的,众所周知的norm n.基准,模范,标准,准则normal adj.正常的;正规的deliver vt.递送,释放sens/sent:感觉sensor n.传感器consent v./n.同意consensus n.一致dissent vi./n.不同意resent vt.憎恨nonsense n.胡话automation n.自动化,自动操作intelligent adj.聪明的,智能的,了解的quotient n.商quota n.定额;限额facility n.设备unprecedented a.空前的rapidly adv.飞快地,迅速地,赶紧地extract n.摘录,选段vt.取出,榨取,摘录leverage n.杠杆作用,杠杆装置,杠杆效率access n.通路,入口,接近,进入,使用权,发作vt.访问,存取,接近,使用drama n.戏剧,戏剧性事件dramatically adv.戏剧地,引人注目地serve vt.招待,供应;为...服务vi.服役,服务,发球n.发球capacity n.容量,能力,才能,资格widespre ad adj.广布的,普及的operation n.操作,动作,手术embrace n.拥抱vt./vi.拥抱,互相拥抱profitable adj.有利润的,有利益的,赚钱的ordinary a.平常的,普通的,平凡的n.平常的人subordinate n.部属,下属adj.从属的coordinate vt.协调adj.协调的n.坐标tango n.探戈tangible a.可触摸的,有实体的,有形的intangible adj.adj.无形的,难以理解的【第一课:文章部分】Our world now moves so fast that we seldom stop to see just how far we have come in just a few years.The latest iPhone6s,for example,has a dual-core processor and fits nicely into your pocket.By comparison,you would expect to find a technological specification like this on your standard laptop in an office anywhere in the world.It’s no wonder shat new applications for the Internet of Things are moving ahead fast when almost every new device we buy has a plug on the end of it or a wireless connection to the internet.Soon,our current smartphone lifestyle will expand to create our own smart home lifestyle too.All researches agree that close to25billion devices,things and sensors will be connected by2020which incidentally is also the moment that Millennials(千禧一代)are expected to make up75percent of our overall workforce,and the fully connected home become a reality for large numbers of people worldwide.However,this is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg as smart buildings and even cities increasingly become the norm as leaders and business owners begin to wake up to the massive savings that technology can deliver through connected sensors and new forms of automation coupled with intelligent energy and facilities management.Online security cameras,intelligent lighting and a wealth of sensors that control both temperature and air quality are offering an unprecedented level of control,efficiency,and improvements to what were once classed necessary costs when running a business or managing a large building.We can expect that the ever-growing list of devices,systems and environments remain connected,always online and talking to each other.The big benefit will not only be in the housing of this enormous and rapidly growing amount of data, but will also be in the ability to run real time data analytics to extract actionable and ongoing knowledge.The biggest and most exciting challenge of this technology is how to creatively leverage this ever-growing amount of data to deliver cost savings,improvements and tangible benefits to both businesses and citizens of these smart cities.The good news is that most of this technology is already invented.Let's face it,it wasn't too long ago that the idea of working from anywhere and at anytime was some form of a distant utopian(乌托邦式的)dream,and yet now we can perform almost any office-based task from any location in the world as long as we have access to the internet.It's time to wake up to the fact that making smart buildings,cities and homes will dramatically improve our quality of life in the years ahead.51.What does the example of iPhone6s serve to show?A)The huge capacity of the smartphones people now use.B)The widespread use of smartphones all over the world.C)The huge impact of new technology on people's everyday life.D)The rapid technological progress in a very short period of time.52.What can we expect to see by the year2020?A)Apps for the internet of Things.C)The emergence of Millennials.B)The popularization of smart homes.D)Total globalization of the world.53.What will business owners do when they become aware of the benefits of the internet of Things?A)Employ fewer workers in their operations.B)Gain automatic control of their businesses.C)Invest in more smart buildings and cities.D)Embrace whatever new technology there is.54.What is the most exciting challenge when we possess more and more data?A)How to turn it to profitable use.C)How to link the actionable systems.B)How to do real time data analysis.D)How to devise new ways to store it.55.What does the author think about working from anywhere and at anytime?A)It is feasible with a connection to the internet.B)It will thrive in smart buildings,cities and homes.C)It is still a distant utopian dream for ordinary workers.D)It will deliver tangible benefits to both boss and worker.【第二课:词汇部分】photography n.摄影;摄影术photic adj.光的;发光的photophobia n.畏光photosynthesis n.光合作用geography地理telegraph电报biography传记calligraphy书法Callisto大熊星座laborious adj.艰苦的;费劲的;勤劳的ordeal n.折磨;严酷的考验infinite adj.无限的definite adj.确定的companion n.同伴;朋友;指南;手册document n.文件vt.记录file n.文件vt.提出profile n.简况high-profile adj.高调的;备受瞩目的interrupt vt./vi.中断;打断associate vt.联想,联系fellow adj.同类的,同伴的n.同事,朋友embark vi.上船/飞机;开始从事presence n.存在;出席;参加absence n.没有;缺乏;缺席absent-minded adj.心不在焉的;健忘的slight adj.轻微的,少量的blight vi.枯萎n.枯萎double-decker bus n.双层巴士forbade vt.禁止(forbid的过去式)digital adj.数字的heighten vt./vi.提高;增高eye-tracking glasses眼球追踪眼镜relief n.减轻relieve vt.减轻belief n.相信believe vt.相信receive vt.收到;接待reception n.接待;接收recipient n.接受者blue-ribbon adj.第一流的;头等的hang onto紧紧抓住,依附immerse vt.沉浸emerge vi.出现submerge v.淹没;潜水adj.在水下的emergency n.出现,急诊immersed adj.浸入的;专注的satisfy vt./vi.令人满意;令人满足erode vt.腐蚀erotic adj.色情的n.好色之徒Mars n.火星march vt./n.行军snap vt./vi.突然折断,拉断;猛咬engaged adj.忙碌的;使用中的;已订婚的vt.吸引,占用vi.从事;参与painstaking adj.艰苦的;勤勉的;小心的n.辛苦;勤勉luxury n.奢侈,奢华;奢侈品;享受adj.奢侈的master n.主人;大师vt.精通;控制enrich vt.使充实;使肥沃;使富足distract vt.转移;分心absorb vt.吸收;吸引;理解derive vt./vi.源于amentia n.智力缺陷demented adj.失去理智的mentation n.心智活动【第二课:文章部分】Photography was once an expensive,laborious ordeal reserved for life's greatest milestones.Now,the only apparent cost to taking infinite photos of something as common as a meal is the space on your hard drive and your dining companion's patience.But is there another cost,a deeper cost,to documenting a life experience instead of simply enjoying it?"You hear that you shouldn't take all these photos and interrupt the experience,and it's bad for you,and we're not living in the present moment,"says Kristin Diehl,associate professor of marketing at the University of Southern California Marshall School of Business.Diehl and her fellow researchers wanted to find out if that was true,so they embarked on a series of nine experiments in the lab and in the field testing people's enjoyment in the presence or absence of a camera.The results,published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,surprised them.Taking photos actually makes people enjoy what they're doing more,not less."What we find is you actually look at the world slightly differently,because you're looking for things you want to capture,that you may want to hang onto,"Diehl explains."That gets people more engaged in the experience,and they tend to enjoy it more."Take sightseeing.In one experiment,nearly200participants boarded a double-decker bus for a tour of Philadelphia. Both bus tours forbade the use of cell phones but one tour provided digital cameras and encouraged people to take photos. The people who took photos enjoyed the experience significantly more,and said they were more engaged,than those who didn't.Snapping a photo directs attention,which heightens the pleasure you get from whatever you're looking at,Diehl says. It works for things as boring as archaeological(考古的)museums,where people were given eye-tracking glasses and instructed either to take photos or not."People look longer at things they want to photograph,"Diehl says.They report liking the exhibits more,too.To the relief of Instagrammers(Instagram用户)everywhere,it can even make meals more enjoyable.When people were encouraged to take at least three photos while they ate lunch,they were more immersed in their meals than those who weren't told to take photos.Was it the satisfying click of the camera?The physical act of the snap?No,they found;just the act of planning to take a photo—and not actually taking it—had the same joy-boosting effect."If you want to take mental photos,that works the same way,"Diehl says."Thinking about what you would want to photograph also gets you more engaged."51.What does the author say about photo-taking in the past?A)It was a painstaking effort for recording life's major events.B)It was a luxury that only a few wealthy people could enjoy.C)It was a good way to preserve one's precious images.D)It was a skill that required lots of practice to master52.Kristin Diehl conducted a series of experiments on photo-taking to find out_______.A)what kind of pleasure it would actually bring to photo-takersB)whether people enjoyed it when they did sightseeingC)how it could help to enrich people's life experiencesD)whether it prevented people enjoying what they were doing53.What do the results of Diehl's experiments show about people taking pictures?A)They are distracted from what they are doing.B)They can better remember what they see or do.C)They are more absorbed in what catches their eye.D)They can have a better understanding of the world.54.What is found about museum visitors with the aid of eye-tracking glasses?A)They come out with better photographs of the exhibits.B)They focus more on the exhibits when taking pictures.C)They have a better view of what are on display.D)They follow the historical events more easily.55.What do we learn from the last paragraph?A)It is better to make plans before taking photos.B)Mental photos can be as beautiful as snapshots.C)Photographers can derive great joy from the click of the camera.D)Even the very thought of taking a photo can have a positive effect.【第三课:词汇部分】notoriously adv.众所周知地;声名狼藉地inedible adj.不能吃的foodie n.吃货treaty n.条约contract n.契约,合同unreliable a.不可靠的liable a.有责任的,有义务的quantify vi.量化qualify vi.取得资格hover vi./n.盘旋,徘徊acquaintance n.熟人;相识;了解accquire vt.获得;取得overestimate vt.对……评价过高underestimate vt.低估overvalue vt.对…估价过高undervalue vt.低估……的价值massive a.大量的overweight adj.超重的outweigh vt.比……重remarkable a.卓越的,非凡的vigil n.监视,警戒vigilance n.警戒,警觉invigilate v.监视,监考invigilator n.监考人surveillance n.监督,监视contemporary art当代艺术constrain vt.束缚constraint n.约束scale up扩大规模large-scale大规模的accuracy n.精确度precision n.精度dip v.浸,下沉dig vt.挖digital adj.数字的digital literacy数字素养format n.格式formula n.公式,准则transform vt.改变,变化contain v.包含;控制;容纳retain vt.保持detain vt.拘留;耽搁unreliable adj.不可靠的;靠不住的tough adj.牢固的;强壮的,困难的rough adj.粗糙的;粗略的;粗野的recall vt.召回;回想起,记起;取消n.召回;回忆;撤消acquire vt.获得;取得;学到acquaintance n.熟人;相识address n.演讲,致辞vt.设法解决;演说contemporary adj.当代的scary adj.可怕的;恐怖的;吓人的【第三课:文章部分】Human memory is notoriously unreliable.Even people with the sharpest facial-recognition skills can only remember so much.It's tough to quantify how good a person is at remembering.No one really knows how many different faces someone can recall,for example,but various estimates tend to hover in the thousands-based on the number of acquaintances aperson might have.Machines aren't limited this way.Give the right computer a massive database of faces,and it can process what it sees-then recognize a face it's told to find-with remarkable speed and precision.This skill is what supports the enormous promise of facial-recognition software in the2lst century.It's also what makes contemporary surveillance systems so scary.The thing is,machines still have limitations when it comes to facial recognition.And scientists are only just beginning to understand what those constraints are.To begin to figure out how computers are struggling,researchers at the University of Washington created a massive database of faces---they call it MegaFace and tested a variety of facial-recognition algorithms(算法)as they scaled up in complexity.The idea was to test the machines on a database that included up to1million different images of nearly700,000different people---and not just a large database featuring a relatively small number of different faces,more consistent with what's been used in other research.As the databases grew,machine accuracy dipped across the board.Algorithms that were right95%of the time when they were dealing with a13,000-image database,for example,were accurate about70%of the time when confronted with 1million images.That's still pretty good,says one of the researchers,Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman."Much better than we expected,"she said.Machines also had difficulty adjusting for people who look a lot alike-either doppelgangers(长相极相似的人),whom the machine would have trouble identifying as two separate people,or the same person who appeared in different photos at different ages or in different lighting,whom the machine would incorrectly view as separate people."Once we scale up,algorithms must be sensitive to tiny changes in identities and at the same time invariant to lighting,pose,age,"Kemelmacher-Shlizerman said.The trouble is,for many of the researchers who'd like to design systems to address these challenges,massive datasets for experimentation just don't exist--at least,not in formats that are accessible to academic researchers.Training sets like the ones Google and Facebook have are private.There are no public databases that contain millions of faces.MegaFace's creators say it's the largest publicly available facial-recognition dataset out there.“An ultimate face recognition algorithm should perform with billions of people in a dataset,”the researchers wrotepared with human memory,machines can.A)identify human faces more efficientlyB)tell a friend from a mere acquaintanceC)store an unlimited number of human facesD)perceive images invisible to the human eye47.Why did researchers create MegaFace?A)To enlarge the volume of the facial-recognition databaseB)To increase the variety of facial-recognition softwareC)To understand computers'problems with facial recognitionD)To reduce the complexity of facial-recognition algorithms48.What does the passage say about machine accuracy?A)It falls short of researchers'expectations.B)It improves with added computing power.C)It varies greatly with different algorithms.D)It decreases as the database size increases.49.What is said to be a shortcoming of facial-recognition machines?A)They cannot easily tell apart people with near-identical appearances.B)They have difficulty identifying changes in facial expressionsC)They are not sensitive to minute changes in people's moodD)They have problems distinguishing people of the same age50.What is the difficulty confronting researchers of facial-recognition machines?A)No computer is yet able to handle huge datasets of human facesB)There do not exist public databases with sufficient face samplerC)There are no appropriate algorithms to process the face samplesD)They have trouble converting face datasets into the right format.【第四课:词汇部分】plunge vi./vt.使陷入n.突然跌落rescue vt.营救generalist n.多面手specialist n.专家vivid adj.生动的survive v.幸存revival n.复活vigor n.活力vigorous adj.精力充沛的vitamin n.维他命approach n./vt./vi.接近vt.处理scream vt./vi.尖叫cream n.奶油,精华,面霜calculate v.计算;打算count v.重要,数数cultivate vt.培养culture n.文化,文明vt.培养evade vt/vi.逃脱;逃避invade vt./vi.侵略wade vi.跋涉counterpart n.极相似的人或物encounter v.遭遇counterbalance v.抵消morality n.道德,品行virtue n.美德conflict vi./n.冲突inflict vt.造成affliction n.痛苦morality n.道德;品行,美德loophole n.漏洞peril n.危险;冒险imperil vt.危及;使陷于危险choke vt.呛;使窒息vi.窒息;阻塞divorce n.离婚;分离soldier n.军人solid adj.固体的;可靠的consolidate vt./vi.巩固abstract a.抽象的n.抽象;摘要code n.代码,密码scenario n.情节scene n.场景duty n.责任;[税收]关税customs n.海关;风俗assess vt.评定;估价highlight vt.突出;强调emphasize vt.强调underline vt.强调underpin vt.巩固;支持odds n.机率probability n.机率adventure novel历险小说detective novel侦探小说erotic novel艳情小说fan fiction同人小说ghost novel灵异小说mystery novel悬疑小说science fiction科幻小说complication n.复杂sophisticated adj.复杂的【第四课:文章部分】In the beginning of the movie l,Robot,a robot has to decide whom to save after two cars plunge into the water-Del Spooner or a child.Even though Spooner screams“Save her Save her!”the robot rescues him because it calculates that he has a45percent chance of survival compared to Sarah's11percent.The robot's decision and its calculated approach raise an important question:would humans make the same choice?And which choice would we want our robotic counterparts to make?Isaac Asimov evaded the whole notion of morality in devising his three laws of robotics,which hold that1.Robots cannot harm humans or allow humans to come to harm;2.Robots must obey humans,except where the order would conflict with law1;and3.Robots must act in self-preservation,unless doing so conflicts with laws1or2.These laws are programmed into Asimov's robots-they don't have to think,judge,or value.They don't have to like humans or believe that hurting them is wrong or bad.They simply don't do it.The robot who rescues Spooner’s life in I,Robot follows Asimov's zero th law:robots cannot harm humanity(as opposed to individual humans)or allow humanity to come to harm--an expansion of the first law that allows robots to determine what's in the greater good.Under the first law,a robot could not harm a dangerous gunman,but under the zero th law,a robot could kill the gunman to save others.Whether it's possible to program a robot with safeguards such as Asimov's laws is debatable A word such as"harm"is vague(what about emotional harm?Is replacing a human employ harm?),and abstract concepts present coding problems. The robots in Asimov's fiction expose complications and loopholes in the three laws,and even when the laws work,robots still have to assess situations.Assessing situations can be complicated.A robot has to identify the players,conditions,and possible outcomes for various scenarios,It’s doubtful that a computer program can do that-at least,not without some undesirable results.A roboticist at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory programmed a robot to save human proxies(替身)called"H-bots"from danger. When one H-bot headed for danger,the robot successfully pushed it out of the way.But when two H-bots became imperiled, the robot choked42percent of the time,unable to decide which to save and letting them both"die."The experiment highlights the importance of morality:without it,how can a robot decide whom to save or what's best for humanity, especially if it can't calculate survival odds?46.What question does the example in the movie raise?A)Whether robots can reach better decisions.B)Whether robots follow Asimov's zero"law.C)How robots may make bad judgments.D)How robots should be programmed.47.What does the author think of Asimov’s three laws of robotics?A)They are apparently divorced from reality.B)They did not follow the coding system of robotics.C)They laid a solid foundation for robotics.D)They did not take moral issues into consideration.48.What does the author say about Asimov's robots?A)They know what is good or bad for human beings.B)They are programmed not to hurt human beings.C)They perform duties in their owners'best interest.D)They stop working when a moral issue is involved.1149.What does the author want to say by mentioning the word"harm"in Asimov's laws?A)Abstract concepts are hard to program.B)It is hard for robots to make decisions.C)Robots may do harm in certain situations.D)Asimov's laws use too many vague terms.50.What has the roboticist at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory found in his experiment?A)Robots can be made as intelligent as human beings some day.B)Robots can have moral issues encoded into their program.C)Robots can have trouble making decisions in complex scenarios.D)Robots can be programmed to perceive potential perils.12。