WP production reliability test standard T-643
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:36.09 KB
- 文档页数:4
Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.Appendix to GES-0128:Outside Lab Capability AssessmentREQUIREMENTSREPORT FORMCOMMENTS CARDCOPYRIGHT © 2008 WHIRLPOOL CORPORATIONDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden. TABLE OF CONTENTSPage Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Auditee Preparation Guidelines ...................................................................................................... 11-12Suggested Outside Lab Capability Assessment Agenda ................................................................. 13 Outside Lab Capability Assessment Topics .................................................................................... 13 Requirement Statements and Guidelines ........................................................................................ 14-15 Auditee Final Assessment Status ................................................................................................... 16 Outside Lab Capability Assessment Requirements ......................................................................... 17 L1 - Quality Systems (equipment & data integrity)................................................................. 18 L2 - Materials Testing .......................................................................................................... 19 L3 - Codes & Regulatory Requirements ............................................................................... 20 L4 - Test Specifications & Procedures .................................................................................. 21 L5 - Test Plans .................................................................................................................... 22-23 L6 - Reliability ………………………………………………………………24 L7 - Lab Product Approval Process ...................................................................................... 25-26L8 – Lab Personnel Experience ………………………………….…………..27-28 L9 – Product Experience and Market Experience (29)Glossary of Terms …………………………………………………...30-31 Outside Lab Assessment Report .................................................................................................... 33 Assessment Individual Key Scores and Findings ............................................................................ 33-35 Comments Card ............................................................................................................................ 36 Comments & Suggestions ..............................................................................................................37Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.FOREWORDThe purpose of this document is to define the proper standard for the assessment of outside labs for potential data source(s) to support Whirlpool Corporation ’s product approval process. It is expected that any outside lab providing data will do so in a manner consistent with Whirlpool ’s Product Approval and Lab Operation process; thus, this Whirlpool ’s assessment is based upon the same “18 PALO Keys to Lab Improvement ” as is used internally at Whirlpool.This Outside Lab Assessment is to be used under the direction of a trained Product Approval representative.The contents of this document explain the necessary steps involved when going through a Whirlpool Outside Lab Assessment. The first section in this package is the “Outside Lab Audit Assessment Guidelines,” which are recommendations on how and what to prepare for the official assessment. Following that is the “Suggested Assessment Agenda .” This agenda is supplied to help the outside lab understand approximately how the time is allocated throughout the day while conducting the assessment. It is only a suggested agenda and does not take into account the size or complexity of the location beingassessed. The section “Guidelines for Use ” contains information about how to use this document. The biggest and most important section called “Assessment Requirements,” lists all the assessment requirements that will be used to evaluate the Outside Lab ’s Capabilities. This section is the core of the assessment process and the assessment team will evaluate the outside lab based upon this material. The sections have been organized to allow a natural flow or progression of questions while performing the Outside Lab Assessment. Finally, the last section called “Outside Lab Assessment Results &Comments Card ,” is a copy of the forms used to write the final assessment report. It includes a copy of a survey that may be filled out by the outside lab after the assessment is complete. It is through this feedback that we can continue to make the assessment process more valuable.This document shall provide all the necessary information to complete an Outside Lab Assessment and Final Report. If any more information is required, the outside lab shall contact the lead assessor. This person can answer any remaining questions.It is our intent that this process will provide Global Whirlpool Technology and Procurement personnel with a solidunderstanding of each Outside Lab ’s capabilities such that enlightened decisions can be made regarding potential testing outsourcing.AUDITEE PREPARATION GUIDELINESAUDITEE: This checklist is provided as an aid to help prepare you for your upcoming Outside Lab Capability Assessment . Basically, a Whirlpool team will be assessing your lab capabilities relative to specific Whirlpool needs and requirements. The key to a successful and efficient audit is preparation, both on the part of the auditee and the audit team. Your responsibility, as Auditee, is to make sure that the following items have been addressed and available as needed.A. Has the agenda for the day(s) of the audit been established and communicated? This is the responsibility ofWhirlpool Lead Assessor. If not complete, please contact the Lead Assessor.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.B. Have you reviewed the Outside Lab assessment standard, understand the requirements and used them toperform a self-evaluation prior to the official visit? Have you sent a copy of your self-assessment to the Whirlpool Lead assessor? C. Do you understand the scoring system?D. Is your documentation and supporting evidence readily available? Suppliers should prepare for the assessmentby gathering initial documentation & evidence by key, summarize it, organize it in a manner that the information can be rapidly selected for discussion, and prepare for additional background evidence should the Lead Assessor desire additional material.Key Point: The audit can be conducted in a much more efficient manner if the supporting documentation isarranged in a sequence corresponding to the Whirlpool requirements.The audit documentation can be flowcharted according to your design process. You may arrange the evidence in that order and notify the lead auditor of the desired flow and the lead auditor will follow your recommendations by re-arranging the assessment keys in the order you have recommended (note: all keys must be completed).E. Have you identified the key contact person (Lab Manager or equivalent) to represent your organization andinterface with the lab assessment team? F. Do you have lead people identified for specific sections of the audit (i.e. reliability, equipment calibration,personnel experience, document management, planning, etc.)? Are they “ready ” when called upon? G. Has a conference room been reserved for the audit team to use? H. Is a telephone available? I.Given the expected complexity of the audit and the size of the facility, has the overall time duration of the audit been estimated and consideration given to necessary breaks, including lunch arrangements, if needed? (Note: In the interest of time, a quick working lunch brought to the audit location is typically preferred.)J. Is any safety equipment required (i.e. safety glasses, steel toe shoes, hearing protection, etc.)?Finally, if you have any other questions or concerns they can and should be resolved with the Whirlpool Certified Lead Assessor prior to the actual audit day.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.SUGGESTED ASSESSMENT AGENDAACTIVITIES:EST. DURATIONIntroduction (Team members/Auditee representatives) .................................................................. 10 - 20 min. Auditee overview of Lab Operation & Facilities .............................................................................. 30 min. Lab Facility Tour ........................................................................................................................... 30 min - 1 Hr. Lab Capability Assessment ............................................................................................................ 4 - 6 Hrs. Scoring & Report Development (Whirlpool Team Only) ................................................................... 30 min – 1 Hr. Closure Meeting ............................................................................................................................ 30 - 45 min.Note: This suggested agenda does not take into account the size or complexity of the location being assessed. The estimated duration should be seen as a guideline only. A typical assessment can take anywhere from 5.0 hr. to 9.0 hrs .Outside Lab Capability Assessment TopicsKey No.KEY NAMEL1 QUALITY SYSTEMS (equipment & data integrity) L2 MATERIALS TESTINGL3 CODES & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS L4 TEST SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURES L5 TEST PLANS L6 RELIABILITYL7 LAB PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS L8 LAB PERSONNAL EXPERIENCEL9PRODUCT EXPERIENCE AND MARKET EXPERIENCEDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.REQUIREMENT STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINESAs mentioned in the Foreword, this audit was designed to evaluate all three dimensions of a lab ’s capability; the Personnel , Equipment, and Documentation . To achieve this, each assessment page is laid out in the following manner: The “KEY ” statements are the first statements written in “Bold ” letters on top of every page in the assessment. The keyDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.Key ScoringAs indicated above, all keys have as a scoring technique a series of incremental points. Within each point are a number of ‘criteria statements ’ that correlate directly with increased compliance to the requirements of the key. From point-to-point these criteria build upon each other in a progressive manner toward excellence in the “Key ” subject matter.For the purposes of scoring, to achieve the “point being evaluated ” the auditee must, in the opinion of the Lead Assessor , meet or exceed all of the criteria based statements assigned to it . Only after meeting the current ‘point ’ requirements may the assessor look toward the next level of incremental criteria. Also, as noted above, to aid in scoring decisions, half-point scores (0.5, 1.5, or 2.5) are permissible.If all of the criteria are not met, the score shall be recorded at the previous “point ” level or, as appropriate, at the half-point score between the previous score and the next incremental score. Key ScoringPOINTSCRITERIA0 Non-Existent – System requirements have not been addressed; there is essentially no evidence of implementation or compliance.1 Traditional - System requirements may informally exist but they are unstructured and potentially inefficient. There is minimal compliance toward required standards.2 Learning - Adequate awareness and understanding of the preferred approach with basic proficiency and implementation levels, reasonable documentation.3 Leading – Full awareness and understanding of the preferred approach with effective and efficient implementation levels, solid documentation, an operational model.Lead Assessor QuestionsThe Lead Assessor Questions shown with each key are intended only as “thought provokers ” or “response generators ”. Their sole purpose is to stimulate supplier discussion on the key topic in a manner applicable to the key ’s scoring criteria. They are not meant to be “all inclusive ”; thus a supplier should focus their attention on the scoring criteria and not the lead assessor questions.Overlap of Key ContentFrom time-to-time it is fully expected that the content of various “Keys ” will overlap with the content of similar keys. To a degree, this is planned into the assessment. The repetition of seeing a topic in multiple areas of this assessment simply signifies the importance of its content.While this may spark some discussion regarding fairness of scoring if the auditee has a particular weakness in the duplicated area; it needs to be recognized as well that if the auditee has strength in this area, their strength will be likewise be multiplied throughout the assessment.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.None, No, Some, Occasional, Most, Majority, All and Always in Criteria Statements:Many of the Results Oriented criteria statements are specifically designed to probe the level of results that the design system should create. There are four levels of evaluation for these questions that contain results oriented requirements. These four levels can be recognized by the use of the words “None, Some, Most and All ” (and their synonyms) in the evaluation criteria. The meaning of these words can be reasonably quantified as shown in the following table:LEVEL RANGE None, no 0 – 5 % Some, occasional 6 - 50 % Most, majority 51 - 85 % All, always86 - 100 %Multiple Outside Lab OperationsIf an Outside Lab has multiple lab operations (i.e. an automotive lab, an appliance lab, a lab for all others, etc.) for the purpose of managing development, cost, and efficiency, the Whirlpool Outside Lab Assessment shall be applied to the section of the Outside Lab ’s business that would typically be utilized to test Whirlpool parts and product.ASSESSMENT STATUSAuditee Status:In addition to the assessment scores, auditees are classified under one of the four different status choices. This status is with regard only to the capability assessment. Additional reviews of specific facility, equipment, fixtures, and test procedure reviews are necessary for final determination of qualification level. These four status choices are Full Qualification , Conditional Qualification, Qualification in Process, and No Qualification . See matrix below:Assessment StatusCriteria(assumes all Keys are being assessed)Full Qualification Assessment that has a minimum score of 2 points or more for each key.Conditional Qualification Assessment that has less than a minimum score of 2 points for any key, but has documented an improvement plan that is acceptable to Whirlpool, with regard to quality and schedule.Qualification InProcessAssessment that is not complete, but plans are in place.No QualificationNo plans or desire to qualify currently.Document Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.OUTSIDE LABASSESSMENTREQUIREMENTSDocument Name:Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised:21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L1 - QUALITY SYSTEM (EQUIPMENT & DATA INTEGRITY)Description: This ‘Key ’ is designed to understand the process for maintaining integrity of their test equipment, test and equipment procedures (work instructions), and test records. Lead Assessor Questions:1. What is your process to calibrate & update laboratory test equipment?2. What is your process for updating test / equipment procedures or work instructions?3. What is your document control process for test records?4. What independent lab certifications or accreditations do you currently hold? (ie. ISO-17025, UL, etc.) 0 pts There is no evidence of test equipment calibrationNo evidence of a process to maintain control of test procedures (work instructions) andtest records.1 ptSome evidence of acceptable test equipment calibration; some examples of expiredcalibration tagsAn informal process to maintain control of test data & documentation exists (procedures,work instructions, etc.).Some test procedures are out-of-date or do not match actual practice2 ptsMost equipment has acceptable calibration and measurement systems analysis evidenceavailableA formal process to maintain control of test data & documentation exists (procedures,work instructions, etc.).Most test procedures are up-of-date and match actual practiceThere exists evidence that key test procedures are reviewed periodically3 ptsThe lab is currently ISO-17025 accredited OR meets the following requirements:All equipment has acceptable calibration and measurement systems analysisevidence availableAll test data (records) is stored in an easily accessible location, controlled through aformal document control system, and are kept for set periods of time (e.g. records retention)All test procedures are up-of-date and match actual practiceAll test procedures are reviewed per schedule or process trigger (evidence required) Equipment is calibrated based upon MSE / MSA needs or control chartingNotes* - calibratedbased upon factual, demonstrated evidence that ‘control ’ has been lost in the measurement device as opposed to calibration based upon a selected time interval.Document Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L2 – MATERIALS TESTINGDescription: The Auditee may be expected to have a fully equipped materials testing lab to analyze and test materials for proper formulation and material properties analysis during design and development. Expected scope would be materials applicable to the industry of the products being tested.Lead Assessor Questions:1. What material testing capability do you have at this location?2. Do you have all the material testing equipment needed for your products?3. Do you have plans to update the materials testing lab? 0 pts There are no materials testing capabilities at this locationAll materials are contracted out for testing and/or analysis1 ptsSome material testing is completed at this locationThe more difficult material testing is contracted outMost auditee test personnel have less than (2) years of test experienceMost materials testing is done based upon informal, unapproved procedures2 pts Most materials testing is completed at this locationMost material testing is completed with formal, detailed test procedures and analysisreports.Most test result records are archived for future referenceSome auditee test personnel have greater than (5) years of test experienceSome test personnel have (2) or more years of formal college training3 pts All material testing is completed with formal, detailed test procedures and analysisreports.All test result records are archived for future referenceAll test result records are archived and easily retrieved for future referenceSome auditee test personnel have greater than (10) years of test experienceMost test personnel are degreed engineersNotesDocument Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L3 – CODES & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTSDescription: This ‘Key ’ is intended to understand how codes and regulatory requirements are implemented and validated at the auditee ’s facility. It also is intended to assess the competency of personnel associated with the codes and regulatory operations.Lead Assessor Questions:1. Please describe the methods used in your product development group to ensure adherence to regulatory agency codesand product safety requirements.2. Please describe your level of certification (of lab and technicians) by appropriate codes agencies (e.g. UL, CSA, IEC,etc.).0 pts No identified codes function at this design locationNo codes agency certification of lab and/or technicians Auditee expects all codes & regulatory requirements to be their customer ’s responsibility 1 ptSome engineering change notice approvals include a sign-off from a codes/safety standpoint There is some evidence that outside codes houses are leveraged to minimize the risk that regulatory gaps may exist 2 ptsSome codes engineer(s) are in place at auditees design facility Some codes agency certification of auditees lab and/or technicians – or - some evidence that outside codes houses are leveraged Most engineering change notices are reviewed and signed-off by a codes/safety expert Most codes requirements are completed by product release Most code engineer test requirements are fully documented 3 ptsLead codes engineer has more than 5 years experience in the Product Approval and Lab Operations All engineering change notices AND temporary change authorizations have a codes/safety sign-off All appropriate labs and technicians are certified by regional appropriate codes agency All codes requirements are completed by product release All code engineer test requirements are fully documented NotesDocument Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedure Date Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L4 - TEST SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURESDescription: Test specifications and procedures are the backbone of the testing and validation process. Their accuracy and use drive the verification and fitness for use decisions that must be made for new and revised products. This key investigates the auditee ’s test specification management system.Lead Assessor Questions:1.What is your process to develop and update test specifications? 1.Is there linkage of test specifications to customer needs? 2.How is data from the field used to create or improve specifications? 3.Who reviews newly created specifications prior to formal release? What is their authority? 4.How are specifications / test procedures reviewed over time? 5. What independent lab certifications or accreditations do you currently hold? (ie. ISO-17025, UL, etc.)0 ptsThere is no process to develop or update test specifications 1 pt There is limited input from design, customer, and field test results into test specificationcreationTest specifications are informally written by individuals who individually put them to useProcedures / test specifications are informally reviewed2 pts A formal process exists for the development and updating of test specifications; however, itmay not always be used as individually generated test specifications still occasionally existThere is some input from ‘the customer ’ and ‘field test results ’ into test specificationdevelopmentThere is some collaboration between design and the lab organizations in test specificationcreationReleased procedures / test specifications are formally reviewed to ensure correctness;review schedule is variable3 pts The lab is currently ISO-17025 accredited OR meets the following requirements:A formal, approved process for the development and updating of specifications existsand its use is a business requirement.Most specifications are developed based upon customer intended functions and are tiedto customer needs / benefits with historical data from the fieldA great deal of collaboration exists between design and lab organizations in testspecification creationReleased procedures / test specifications are regularly reviewed by a cross-functionaltechnical team according to a developed scheduleNotesDocument Name: Global Outside Lab QualificationProcedureDate Revised: 21-May-08© 20yy – 20yy Whirlpool Corporation. The subject matter shown hereon is disclosed in confidence to the extent it is original with Whirlpool.Disclosure to other parties except in filling Whirlpool orders is forbidden.KEY #L5 – TEST PLANSDescription: This ‘Key ’ evaluates the process used to develop and implement test plans for testing and approving products that meet customer requirements. It includes how test plans are continuously improved with new requirements such that results achieved from approved product lead to better products.Lead Assessor Questions:1.How are test plans for new features / products developed? Who has input to their creation? 2.Please describe how DFMEA ’s provide directional content to the creation of your test plans. 3.Is there a standardized template used for test plan development? 4.When in the development cycle are test plans created and how are they linked to the customer specifications? 5.Are new tests developed when new specifications are created? 0 ptsAuditee has no formal test plans - they do minimal testing Auditee does not create their own test plans (customer assumes this responsibility) 1 pt Evidence shows only standard tests are used and minimal or no critical thought is given for newtests.Tests plans are typically created close to product launch (reacting to the timetable)The Product Approval Group & Design Engineering only occasionally interact in test plandevelopmentThere is evidence that DFMEA ’s are used in some test plan creation.2 pts Test plans are based on prior test documents; no specific regional /global template is usedNew, unique tests are developed for unique features or new product based upon customerinsightsSome test plans are developed early in the process.Test plans are jointly developed between the Product Approval Group and Design EngineeringGroup with the Product Approval Group having the overall authority on most test plan content.There is some test plan coordination / interaction with customers (i.e. effect on other customerparts).There is evidence that DFMEA ’s are used in most test plan creation.3 ptsTest plan development template (w/standard tests) used to drive critical thought for all projecttest plans.There is clear evidence of new tests proactively developed and based upon customer insights.These tests are shown to be linked to newly developed product specificationsTest plans are jointly developed with the Product Approval Group and Design Engineering, andit is clearly documented that the Product Approval engineer has the final authority on all test plan content.There is considerable test plan coordination / interaction with customers (i.e. effect on othercustomer parts).There is evidence that DFMEA ’s are used in all test plan creation.Most test plans are developed early in the process.。
1981Walk-In ChambersFrom aerospace and avionics to refrigerators and automobiles, Thermotron Walk-In chambers serve as test sites for components, assemblies, and finished products. Thermotron is dedicated to supplying test equipment designed to meet specific needs. Understanding the product’s size, quantity, and test requirements help determine the best chamber size for your application. If our standard equipment does not address your test requirements, we will design a custom test chamber that can. Thermotron Walk-In chambers are designed and built to last.Panel Walk-InThermotron panel Walk-In chambers are made from lightweight panels for fast and easy installation. Locating pins ensure anaccurate fit and the “cam over center” locks securely join panels in place. The corner posts are built at a defined 90-degree angle to strengthen and align the entire chamber.The WP-1377-THCM4-25 pictured was used for testing food service equipment.Exterior Surface FinishPatterned aluminum or painted surface4” (10 cm) Urethane Insulation Ensures locked-in temperature during testing Cam Action Speed Lock Allows for a tight fit and locked-in humidity Embedded Steel Straps Provides positive seal around the chamber Interior Surface Finish Stainless steel or aluminumHeavy Duty Inside Floor Supports product loads up to 600 lbs (272 kg) per square foot AnteroomsMaintains conditions of the chamber when entry is necessary Special Panel SizesAvailable to custom configure your chamberFeatures and BenefitsSolid Walk-InThermotron designs and manufactures solid-weldedconstruction chambers for applications requiring more than 85°C and temperature-humidity testing.The WS-150-CHM-12-12 pictured on the right was built to test extra large solar panels for real-world environmental factors.Features and BenefitsAll Solid Walk-In chambers are custom designed andengineered to meet specific testing needs. Speak with your local sales representative or an application engineer about how Thermotron can build a custom chamber for you.Flexible and SelectableThermotron has a wide variety of standard conditioning module configurations ready to interface to a panel assembly. This flexible interface allows you to mix and match the box size and module in order to meet individual test requirements. Conditioning modules are predesigned and prepackaged with a conditioning plenum and refrigeration machinery mounted on a common base. If the standard module sizes don’t meet your needs, custom configurations are available as well.Air-Cooled Condenser Eliminates the requirement for cooling waterShelvingFree-standing, foldable, or wall-attached shelvesDry Air PurgeUtilizes compressed air to minimize moisture in the chamberMultiple Door SizesChoose from hinged, sliding, vertical lift, or bi-parting hinged doors Humidity Purification System 5-micron pre-filter and demineralizer purifies humidity inlet water LN 2 Injection Through a cooling coil in the conditioning plenum Interior Lighting Incandescent or fluorescent mounted on the ceiling Electrical OutletsInstalled on the interior side wallsRefrigeration Quiet Package Reduces noise levels produced by the machinery RampsAssists in bringing products into the chamberRemote Refrigeration Package Machinery can be located up to 50 feet from the chamber Spreader PlateIncreases point load capabilities and roll load capabilityOptions8800 Programmer ControllerThermotron’s exclusive Windows®-based 8800 Programmer Controller supports familiar and robust operations on a 12” color touchscreen. The 8800 is Ethernet and web-enabled for anytime/anywhere access and has a multi-level, password-based security system.The 8800 is ThermoTrak II compatible, allowing up to 32 controllers to be connected to a single PC. The controller can also be used on a smartphone or tablet through a VNC server.Some other benefits of the 8800 include endless graphing capabilities, setup wizards, raw data reports exportable to a commonly used spreadsheet format, and complete report generation.Additional Options■Custom port sizes and shapes ■Defrosting capabilities■Water spray for moisture testing ■Non-sparking interior ■Floor reinforcement■Product and electrical feedthroughs■Product connectors through internal raceways ■“CE” mark is offered on European units■Low humidity applications for electrostatic reliability testing■Special electrical standards and various power configurations■Variable speed control of airflow from ceiling, wall, or floor■Interior suspended ceiling reduces air supply velocity and increases air distribution controlTHERMOTRON INDUSTRIES, U.K.Newton House Winch RoadKent Science Park Sittingbourne, Kent ME9 8EF England (P): 01795 436333(F): 01795 436777*******************.ukTHERMOTRON INDUSTRIES 291 Kollen Park DriveHolland, Michigan, USA 49423(P): (616) 393-4580(F): (616) 392-5643*******************©THERMOTRON INDUSTRIESJuly 2013 Printed in USAThermotron has the largest, best equipped, and most highly trained service force in the test equipment industry. Direct sales representatives, application engineers, and field service engineers provide support before and after the sale. From preventive maintenance and service seminars to our responsive parts department, our worldwide service centers and support staff provide expert assistance.We use the precepts of quality to grow and continuously improve our company and employees in order to meet or exceed our customers’ expectations. As industriesevolve and specifications change, our customers face new challenges. We strive to help them meet those challenges by providing state-of-the-art testing equipment. We help great companies make great products.Our PromisePanel Walk-InConditioning Module InterfaceSingle stage refrigeration performance temperature range: -34C to 85C (-29F to 185F) Cascade refrigeration performance: -68°C to 85°C (-90°F to 185°F) TCM stands for Temperature Conditioning ModuleTHCM stands for Temperature Humidity Conditioning Module.Standard Humidity Range: 20% to 95% relative humidity, limited by a dewpoint range of 5°C to 65°C (42°F to 149°F) and a maximum dry bulb temperature of 70°C (158°F)Optional Low Humidity Range: 5% to 95% relative humidity, limited by a dewpoint range of -10°C to 65°C (-42°F to 149°F) and a maximum dry bulb temperature of -5°C to 70°C (-41°F to 158°F)• Low humidity capability expanded down to 5% RH primarily for the purposes of electrostatic reliability testing by utilizing an electrical desiccant dryer.• The electronic humidity sensor eliminates the need for the traditional wet bulb. • Specifications subject to change. Accessories may impact performance.be used by the conditioning module plenum.This is a list of common sizes and other custom sizes are available. Thermotron can make Panel Walk-In chambers much larger than WP-1422. Please consult with your local sales person or an application engineer for more information.Panel Walk-In Humidity Range。
Specification History of revision 版本更改历史记录Version 版本号Date更改时间Event更改内容012012-2-6First issue2/14SpecificationContents 目录1.Scope 适用范围 (4)2.Adopted Standard 引用标准 (4)3.Electrical Characteristics 电气特性 (4)4.Battery Configuration 电池组成 (5)5.Battery Performances Test Criterion 电池性能测试规范 (5)5.1 Appearance 外观 (5)5.2 Measurement Apparatus 测试设备 (5)5.3 Testing Condition 测试条件 (6)5.4 Reliability Test 可靠性测试 (6)6.Shipment 运输 (8)7.Storage 贮存 (8)8.Package and Marking 包装与标志 (8)8.1 Package 包装 (8)8.2 Marking 标志 (8)9.Protection Circuit 保护电路 (9)9.1 Schematic of the PCB 保护板原理图 (9)9.2 PCM BOM (9)9.3 PCM Parameter PCM 参数 (9)10.Outline Drawing 外形图 (10)11.Appendix 附录 (11)11.1 Instructions and Safety Requirement 使用说明和安全规程 (11)11.1.1 Recommending Usage 推荐使用事项 (11)11.1.2 Hazard Warning 危险警告 (11)11.1.3 Warning 警告 (12)11.1.4 Cautions 注意事项 (13)11.2 Quality Evaluation Programme 质量评定 (14)11.3 Environment Protection 环保要求 (14)11.4 Others 其他事项 (14)3/14No 序号Item 内容Parameter 参数Remark 备注1Rating Voltage3.7VTypical:450mAh典型:2Capacity标称容量Minimum:400mAh最小:0.2C discharge afterfull charge。
薄膜电池材料及术语(中英文对照) AAcetone-丙酮Adjustment-调整,调节Aluminium(Al)-铝Arqon(Ar)-氩气Alternating current(AC)-交流电Ammonia(NH3)-氨气Amorphous-非晶的Anneal-退火Assembly-组装average power-平均功率BBackplane 背板Back conductor-背电极Back electrode-背电极balance gas-平衡气B2H6-硼烷Bounding-绑定Buffer-缓冲器built-in voltage-内建电压Building Integrated Photovoltaic-建筑一体化CCable-电缆Carrier-运送者,搬运器Cover glass-覆盖玻璃Chemical Vapor Deposition(CVD)-化学气相沉积Commit-提交,答应负责Copper(Cu)-铜Contamination-污染,玷污Conversion -转换,转化Cumulate-adj.累积的;v.累积Cathode-阴极Crystalline-晶体的Crystallite-微晶Chamber-室,房间Curve-曲线DDenser-密集的,浓厚的Deviation-背离,偏离Diffusion-扩散,传播,漫射Diode-二极管Double side sticking tape-双边粘结带Deposition-沉积Drill-钻孔Dielectric-电介质,绝缘体Direct current(DC)-直流电Dilution-稀释drift current-漂移电流EEdge-边缘,边EVA-乙烯-醋酸乙烯共聚物Evaporation-蒸发,蒸镀Etch-蚀刻efficiency-效率Encapsulation-封装Energy-能量FFast glue-快干胶Feature-特征,特色Flux-流量Foil-金属薄片Flaming-烧结Fabrication-制作,构成Furnace-熔炉,炉子GGlass washing detergent-玻璃清洗液Guarantee-保证,担保HHydrogen(H2) -氢气Helium(He)-氦气Ii-layer-i-层,本征层Infra-red(IR)-红外线I-V -电流-电压Incidence Waves-入射波initial-初始的,最初的Installation-安装,装置JJunction-结LLaser-Scribing-镭射分层,激光划线Lay out-平面图Lamination-层压,迭片Laminators层压机Lift-升距Liquid nitrogen-液氮MMagnetron-磁电管Maintenance-维修,维护Masking tape-包装带Masking paper-包装纸Methane(CH4) -甲烷Micromorph-微晶Module-模组Modify-更改,修改Metal organic Chemical Vapor Deposition(MOCVD)-金属有机化学气相沉积NNitrogen(N2)-氮气NF3-三氟化氮n-layer-n-层,含电子较多,掺N或POon-grid-并网organization-组织,机构,团体Oven-烤箱, 烤炉Output-产量Outdoor-户外的PPattern -V.形成,图案化;n.模式,图案PBS-聚(丁二烯-苯乙烯)PBT-聚对苯二甲酸丁二酯peak watt-峰瓦Plasma-等离子Plasma Enhance Chemical Vapor Deposition(PECVD)-等离子增强化学气相沉积p-layer-p层,空穴较多,掺硼Pilot-试生产Phosipine(PH3)-膦烷gmdPower-功率potted component-密封元件Preheat预热Preliminary-初步的Pressure-压力PVB-聚乙烯醇缩丁醛树脂Physical Vapor Deposition(PVD)—物理气相沉积PESC电池-发射结钝化太阳电池QQuality assessment(QA)-质量评价Quality control(QC)-质量控制,质量管理Qualification-资格,资质RRadio frequency(RF)-射频Recombination-复合Rise-升程Reliability-可靠性SSandblasting material-喷沙材料Seal -密封Seal belt-密封带Seal gum-密封胶Sealing arrangement-密封装置Semiconductor-半导体Silane(SiH4) -硅烷Silicon rubber -硅胶Silver(Ag)-银Single junction-单结Solar-太阳的,太阳能的Solar cell-太阳能电池Solar simulator-太阳光模拟器Solder-焊料,焊接Sputter -溅射Sodium bisulfide-硫化钠Sodium cloride-氯化钠SF6-六氟化硫Substrate-底物,基板Specify-指定,详细说明TTandem-叠层Target-靶材Tedlar-聚乙烯氟化物薄膜Temperature Coefficient-温度系数Thin film-薄膜TPT-太阳能背膜TPE-磷酸三苯酯,薄膜电池封装材料之一Transparent Conductive Oxide (TCO) -透明导电氧化层Trap-诱捕Trimethyl borate <B(CH3)3> -三甲基硼Trimmer -整理,清理Texturing-织构turn-key solution-交钥匙工程UUV-紫外Ultravacuum-超真空Vgloves-手套Vacuum-真空,空间Very High Frequency(VHF)-甚高频Vertical-垂直的WWafer-晶片,圆片,硅片Wiring-配线ZZinc(Zn)-锌常用符号Js-反向饱和电流密度R-反射系数T-透射系数α-吸收系数λ-波长Voc-开路电压:在p-n开路情况下(R=∞),p-n结两端的电压。
薄膜电池材料及术语(中英文对照) AAcetone-丙酮Adjustment-调整,调节Aluminium(Al)-铝Arqon(Ar)-氩气Alternating current(AC)-交流电Ammonia(NH3)-氨气Amorphous-非晶的Anneal-退火Assembly-组装average power-平均功率BBackplane 背板Back conductor-背电极Back electrode-背电极balance gas-平衡气B2H6-硼烷Bounding-绑定Buffer-缓冲器built-in voltage-内建电压Building Integrated Photovoltaic-建筑一体化CCable-电缆Carrier-运送者,搬运器Cover glass-覆盖玻璃Chemical Vapor Deposition(CVD)-化学气相沉积Commit-提交,答应负责Copper(Cu)-铜Contamination-污染,玷污Conversion -转换,转化Cumulate-adj.累积的;v.累积Cathode-阴极Crystalline-晶体的Crystallite-微晶Chamber-室,房间Curve-曲线DDenser-密集的,浓厚的Deviation-背离,偏离Diffusion-扩散,传播,漫射Diode-二极管Double side sticking tape-双边粘结带Deposition-沉积Drill-钻孔Dielectric-电介质,绝缘体Direct current(DC)-直流电Dilution-稀释drift current-漂移电流EEdge-边缘,边EVA-乙烯-醋酸乙烯共聚物Evaporation-蒸发,蒸镀Etch-蚀刻efficiency-效率Encapsulation-封装Energy-能量FFast glue-快干胶Feature-特征,特色Flux-流量Foil-金属薄片Flaming-烧结Fabrication-制作,构成Furnace-熔炉,炉子GGlass washing detergent-玻璃清洗液Guarantee-保证,担保HHydrogen(H2) -氢气Helium(He)-氦气Ii-layer-i-层,本征层Infra-red(IR)-红外线I-V -电流-电压Incidence Waves-入射波initial-初始的,最初的Installation-安装,装置JJunction-结LLaser-Scribing-镭射分层,激光划线Lay out-平面图Lamination-层压,迭片Laminators层压机Lift-升距Liquid nitrogen-液氮MMagnetron-磁电管Maintenance-维修,维护Masking tape-包装带Masking paper-包装纸Methane(CH4) -甲烷Micromorph-微晶Module-模组Modify-更改,修改Metal organic Chemical Vapor Deposition(MOCVD)-金属有机化学气相沉积NNitrogen(N2)-氮气NF3-三氟化氮n-layer-n-层,含电子较多,掺N或POon-grid-并网organization-组织,机构,团体Oven-烤箱, 烤炉Output-产量Outdoor-户外的PPattern -V.形成,图案化;n.模式,图案PBS-聚(丁二烯-苯乙烯)PBT-聚对苯二甲酸丁二酯peak watt-峰瓦Plasma-等离子Plasma Enhance Chemical Vapor Deposition(PECVD)-等离子增强化学气相沉积p-layer-p层,空穴较多,掺硼Pilot-试生产Phosipine(PH3)-膦烷gmdPower-功率potted component-密封元件Preheat预热Preliminary-初步的Pressure-压力PVB-聚乙烯醇缩丁醛树脂Physical Vapor Deposition(PVD)—物理气相沉积PESC电池-发射结钝化太阳电池QQuality assessment(QA)-质量评价Quality control(QC)-质量控制,质量管理Qualification-资格,资质RRadio frequency(RF)-射频Recombination-复合Rise-升程Reliability-可靠性SSandblasting material-喷沙材料Seal -密封Seal belt-密封带Seal gum-密封胶Sealing arrangement-密封装置Semiconductor-半导体Silane(SiH4) -硅烷Silicon rubber -硅胶Silver(Ag)-银Single junction-单结Solar-太阳的,太阳能的Solar cell-太阳能电池Solar simulator-太阳光模拟器Solder-焊料,焊接Sputter -溅射Sodium bisulfide-硫化钠Sodium cloride-氯化钠SF6-六氟化硫Substrate-底物,基板Specify-指定,详细说明TTandem-叠层Target-靶材Tedlar-聚乙烯氟化物薄膜Temperature Coefficient-温度系数Thin film-薄膜TPT-太阳能背膜TPE-磷酸三苯酯,薄膜电池封装材料之一Transparent Conductive Oxide (TCO) -透明导电氧化层Trap-诱捕Trimethyl borate <B(CH3)3> -三甲基硼Trimmer -整理,清理Texturing-织构turn-key solution-交钥匙工程UUV-紫外Ultravacuum-超真空Vgloves-手套Vacuum-真空,空间Very High Frequency(VHF)-甚高频Vertical-垂直的WWafer-晶片,圆片,硅片Wiring-配线ZZinc(Zn)-锌常用符号Js-反向饱和电流密度R-反射系数T-透射系数α-吸收系数λ-波长Voc-开路电压:在p-n开路情况下(R=∞),p-n结两端的电压。
35IPC-QL 365A Certification of Facilities That Inspect/Test Printed Boards, Components and Materials36IPC-MI-660 Incoming Inspection of Raw Materials Manual 37IPC-HDBK-005 Guide to Solder Paste Assessment38IPC-HDBK-830 Guideline for Design, Selection and Application of Conformal Coatings39IPC-7530 Guidelines for Temperature Profiling for Mass Soldering (Reflow & Wave) Processes40IPC-TP-1115 Selection and Implementation Strategy for a Low-Residue No-Clean Process41IPC-S-816 SMT Process Guideline & Checklist42IPC-CM-770E Component Mounting Guidelines for Printed Boards43IPC-9850-K Surface Mount Placement Equipment Characterization-KIT44IPC-9850-TM-KW, IPC-9850-TM-K Test Materials Kit for Surface Mount Placement Equipment Standardization45• 4 IPC-9850 Placement Accuracy Verification Panels46• 1 IPC-9850 CMM Measurement Verification Panels47• 150 IPC-9850 QFP-100 Glass Components48• 130 IPC-9850 QFP-208 Glass Components49• 150 IPC-9850 BGA-228 Glass Components50• NIST Traceable Measurement Certificate51• Custom Storage Case52IPC-TR-464 Accelerated Aging for Solderability Evaluations53SMC-WP-001 Soldering Capability White Paper Report54SMC-WP-005 PCB Surface FinishesIPC:Association Connecting Electronics Industries(电子制造协会),从The Institute of Printed Cir Institute of the Interconnecting and Packing Electronic Circuit”(电子电路互连与封装协会)逐步发展衍印制板, 元件和材料检验/试验企业的授证原材料接收检验手册焊膏性能评价手册敷形涂层的设计,选择和应用手册大规模焊接(回流焊与波峰焊)过程温度曲线指南低残留不清洗工艺的选择和实施表面安装技术过程导则及检核表印制板元件安装导则表面贴装设备性能检测方法的描述(附Gerber格式CD盘)表面贴装设备性能测试用的标准工具包可焊性加速老化评价(附修订)可焊性工艺导论印制电路板表面清洗电子组装的IPC标准列表子制造协会),从The Institute of Printed Circiut(印制电路板协会),The rcuit”(电子电路互连与封装协会)逐步发展衍变而来.IPC标准清单No.英文名称1IPC-T-50G Terms and Definition for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits2IPC-TM-650 Test Methods Manual3IPC/EIA J-STD-001C Requirements for Soldered Electrical & Electronic Assemblies4IPC-HDBK-001 Handbook and Guide to Supplement J-STD-001—Includes Amendment 15IPC-A-610D Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies6IPC-HDBK-610 Handbook and Guide to IPC-A-610 (Includes IPC-A-610B to C Comparison7IPC-EA-100-K Electronic Assembly Reference Set8IPC/WHMA-A-620 Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire Harness Assemblies9IPC/EIA J-STD-012 Implementation of Flip Chip and Chip Scale Technology 10IPC-SM-784 Guidelines for Chip-on-Board Technology Implementation 11IPC/EIA J-STD-026 Semiconductor Design Standard for Flip Chip Applications 12J-STD-027 Mechanical Outline Standard for Flip Chip and Chip Size Configurations13IPC/EIA J-STD-028 Performance Standard for Construction of Flip Chip and Chip Scale Bumps14J-STD-013 Implementation of Ball Grid Array and Other High Density Technology15IPC-7095 Design and Assembly Process Implementation for BGAs 16IPC/EIA J-STD-032 Performance Standard for Ball Grid Array Balls 17IPC-MC-790 Guidelines for Multichip Module Technology Utilization 18IPC-M-108 Cleaning Guides and Handbook Manual19IPC-5701 Users Guide for Cleanliness of Unpopulated Printed Boards 20IPC-TP-1113 Circuit Board Ionic Cleanliness Measurement: What Does It Tell Us?21IPC-CH-65A Guidelines for Cleaning of Printed Boards & Assemblies 22IPC-SC-60A Post Solder Solvent Cleaning Handbook23IPC-SA-61A Post Solder Semi-aqueous Cleaning Handbook 24IPC-AC-62A Aqueous Post Solder Cleaning Handbook25IPC-TR-476A Electrochemical Migration: Electrically Induced Failures in Printed Circuit Assemblies26IPC-TR-582 Cleaning and Cleanliness Test Program for: Phase 3 --Low Solids, Fluxes and Pastes Processed in Ambient Air 27IPC-TR-583 An In-Depth Look At Ionic Cleanliness Testing 28IPC-9201 Surface Insulation Resistance Handbook29IPC-TP-104-K Cleaning & Cleanliness Test Program, Phase 3 Water Soluble Fluxes,30IPC-M-109 Component Handling Manual31IPC/JEDEC J-STD-020C Moisture/Reflow Sensitivity Classification for Nonhermetic Solid State Surface Mount Devices32IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033A Handling, Packing, Shipping and Use of Moisture/Reflow Sensitive Surface Mount Devices33IPC/JEDEC J-STD-035 Acoustic Microscopy for Non-Hermetic Encapsulated Electronic Components34IPC-DRM-18G Component Identification Desk Reference Manual 35IPC-DRM-SMT-C Surface Mount Solder Joint Evaluation Desk Reference Manual36IPC-DRM-40E Through-Hole Solder Joint Evaluation Desk Reference Manual 37IPC-DRM-56 Wire Preparation & Crimping Desk Reference Manual 38IPC-DRM-53 Introduction to Electronics Assembly Desk Reference Manual 39IPC-M-103 Standards for Surface Mount Assemblies Manual 40IPC-M-104 Standards for Printed Board Assembly Manual 41IPC-TA-722 Technology Assessment of Soldering42IPC-TA-723 Technology Assessment Handbook on Surface Mounting 43IPC-TA-724 Technology Assessment Series on Clean Rooms 44IPC-SM-780 Component Packaging and Interconnecting with Emphasis on Surface Mounting45IPC-SM-785 Guidelines for Accelerated Reliability Testing of Surface Mount Attachments46IPC-9701 Performance Test Methods and Qualification Requirements for Surface Mount Solder Attachments47IPC/JEDEC-9702 Monotonic Bend Characterization of Board-Level Interconnects48IPC-PD-335 Electronic Packaging Handbook 49IPC-7525 Stencil Design Guidelines50IPC-QL 365A Certification of Facilities That Inspect/Test Printed Boards, Components and Materials51IPC-9191 General Guidelines for Implementation of Statistical Process Control 52IPC-TR-581 IPC Phase III Controlled Atmosphere Soldering Study 53IPC-MI-660 Incoming Inspection of Raw Materials Manual54IPC/EIA J-STD-004A Requirements for Soldering Fluxes-Includes Amendment 155IPC/EIA J-STD-005 Requirements for Soldering Pastes-Includes Amendment 156IPC-HDBK-005 Guide to Solder Paste Assessment57IPC/EIA J-STD-006A Requirements for Electronic Grade SolderAlloys and Fluxed and Non-Fluxed Solid Solders 电子设备用电子级锡焊合金、带焊剂及不带剂整体焊料技术要求58IPC-SM-817 General Requirements for Dielectric Surface Mounting Adhesives 59ELEC-SOLDER Modern Solder Technology for Competitive Electronics Manufacturing60IPC-WP-006 Round Robin Testing & Analysis: Lead-Free Alloys-Tin,Silver, & Copper61IPC-CA-821 General Requirements for Thermally Conductive Adhesives 62IPC-3406 Guidelines for Electrically Conductive Surface Mount Adhesives63IPC-3408 General Requirements for Anisotropically Conductive Adhesives Films64IPC-CC-830B Qualification and Performance of Electrical Insulating Compound for Printed Wiring Assemblies65IPC-HDBK-830 Guideline for Design, Selection and Application of Conformal Coatings66IPC-SM-840C Qualification and Performance of Permanent Solder67IPC-HDBK-840 Guide to Solder Paste Assessment68ELEC-MICRO Handbook of Lead Free Solder Technology for Microelectronic Assemblies69IPC-TP-1114 The Layman’s Guide to Qualifying a Process to J-STD-00170IPC-AJ-820 Assembly & Joining Handbook71IPC-7530 Guidelines for Temperature Profiling for Mass Soldering (Reflow & Wave) Processes72IPC-TP-1090 The Layman’s Guide to Qualifying New Fluxes73IPC-TP-1115 Selection and Implementation Strategy for a Low-Residue No-Clean Process74IPC-S-816 SMT Process Guideline & Checklist75IPC-TR-460A Trouble-Shooting Checklist for Wave Soldering Printed Wiring Boards76IPC-CM-770E Component Mounting Guidelines for Printed Boards77IPC-7912A Calculation of DPMO & Manufacturing Indices for Printed Board Assemblies78IPC-9261 In-Process DPMO and Estimated Yield for PWAs79IPC-DPMO-202 IPC-7912/9261 End Item and In Process DPMO Set80IPC-9500-K Assembly Process Component Simulations, Guidelines & Classifications Package81IPC-9501 PWB Assembly Process Simulation for Evaluation of Electronic Components82IPC-9502 PWB Assembly Soldering Process Guideline for Electronic Components83IPC-9503 Moisture Sensitivity Classification for Non-IC Components84IPC-9504 Assembly Process Simulation for Evaluation of Non-IC Components (Preconditioning Non-IC Components)85IPC-9850-K Surface Mount Placement Equipment Characterization-KIT86IPC-9850-TM-KW, IPC-9850-TM-K Test Materials Kit for Surface Mount Placement Equipment Standardization87• 4 IPC-9850 Placement Accuracy Verification Panels 88• 1 IPC-9850 CMM Measurement Verification Panels 89• 150 IPC-9850 QFP-100 Glass Components90• 130 IPC-9850 QFP-208 Glass Components91• 150 IPC-9850 BGA-228 Glass Components92• NIST Traceable Measurement Certificate93• Custom Storage Case94IPC-7711/21A95IPC/EIA J-STD-002B Solderability Tests for Component Leads, Terminations, Lugs, Terminals and Wires96IPC/EIA J-STD-003A Solderability Tests for Printed Boards97IPC-TR-461 Trouble-Shooting Checklist for Wave Soldering Printed Wiring Boards98IPC-TR-462 Solderability Evaluation of Printed Boards with Protective Coatings Over Long-term Storage99IPC-TR-464 Accelerated Aging for Solderability Evaluations100IPC-TR-465-1 Round Robin Test on Steam Ager Temperature Control Stability101IPC-TR-465-2 The Effect of Steam Aging Time and Temperature on Solderability Test Results103IPC-TR-466 Technical Report: Wetting Balance Standard Weight Comparison Test104SMC-WP-001 Soldering Capability White Paper Report105SMC-WP-005 PCB Surface FinishesIPC:Association Connecting Electronics Industries(电子制造协会),从The Institute of Printed Cir Institute of the Interconnecting and Packing Electronic Circuit”(电子电路互连与封装协会)逐步发展衍标准清单中文名称电子电路互连与封装的定义和术语试验方法手册电气与电子组装件锡焊要求J-STD-001辅助手册及指南及修改说明1印制板组装件验收条件IPC-610手册和指南(包括IPC-A-610B和C的对比)电子组装成套手册,包括:IPC/EIA J-STD-001C,IPC-HDBK-001,IPC-A-610C。
ST. JOSEPH, MICHIGAN, 49085, USA 1 of 4Prepared by: Jeffrey Sankey Rev. Letter AEN No.: Title: Power Quality Voltage Interruption Test Date: 07/17/061 TitlePower Quality Voltage Interruption Test2 SubjectThis specification applies to KitchenAid portable appliances as a category in general. If there are any discrepancies between this specification and the product (“B”) specification, the product (“B”) specification is to have precedence.This specification must be reviewed for applicability to the specific product in question and issubject to revision if needed for the specific product. If any product specific changes are needed, they shall be noted in the product (“B”) specification.3 PurposeThe test is designed to determine if products will perform acceptably while subjected to AC power line interruptions for various time intervals.Failures due to this test will usually be of the software interrupt type rather than hardware,although due to high inrush current to some devices on power restoration, hardware failuresand/or protective device actuations may be experienced.The product performance must be constantly monitored during the test to determine if failuressuch as sequence, timing or program changes occur. Each product must be evaluated basedupon its design and functions.Whirlpool Corporation reserves the right to modify these specifications, as required. For a class of component not covered in this document, the appropriate KitchenAid or Whirlpool productproject team will establish the criteria for laboratory approval. Whirlpool Corporation reserves the right to require any further additional testing by the supplier, in addition to this specification.4 DefinitionsDevice Under Test (DUT)Dut is an abbreviation for Device Under Test. It is interchangeable with the abbreviation EUT(Equipment Under Test) and refers to the sample being tested.StandbyThe DUT is not operating, but power is applied to electronic controls, clock, memory and/or other electronics.OperatingPower is applied to all controls and functions as selected. The DUT is performing its normal duty or function.ST. JOSEPH, MICHIGAN, 49085, USA 2 of 45 ReferencesIEC 61000-4-11 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)Whirlpool (SEARS) AC Line Interrupt Test, TP 5-1.6 EquipmentInstrument Accuracy LevelAC Power Supply Programmable with the following capabilities:voltageregulation5%• +/-•Switching from nominal to zero (0) voltage or visa versa inless than 100 µS.7 Requirements7.1 TestSamples7.1.1 A minimum of three device samples should be tested. More samples may need to be tested ifdeemed necessary by the product or laboratory engineer due to variation previously encountered or concern that all failure modes have not been captured.7.1.2 Refer to the DUT (“B”) specification for product modes of operation and any special applications.7.1.3 The AC power line is to be switched from DUT nominal levels to zero (0) for the time intervalsspecified, and then brought back to nominal again. As specified by the product or laboratoryengineer, the AC line impedance during the time the voltage is at zero shall be either at or below1 ohm (short circuit) or infinite (open circuit) for a given test series. (NOTE: The low impedancesimulates a line dropout or short circuit; the open circuit simulates a circuit breaker opening.)7.1.4 The interval between interruptions (AC line voltage at nominal) should be 30 seconds to allow forDUT response, observations and documentation.7.1.5 The switching between nominal and zero (0) voltage and back to nominal is to be performedasynchronous (i.e. independent of phase) unless otherwise specified by the product or laboratory engineer.7.1.6 Unless stipulated otherwise by the product or laboratory engineer, the testing under section 7.2shall be performed for all standby and operating modes for the DUT.7.1.7 Testing of safeguard systems or electromechanical device response to voltage dips (ie: 40% or70% nominal) may be performed in accordance with section 7.2 in lieu of full dropout as specified by the product or laboratory engineer.7.2 Testing7.2.1 Drop the AC line voltage to zero (0) volts and return to nominal line voltage per the interruptiontime and time increment sequence shown in Table 1.ST. JOSEPH, MICHIGAN, 49085, USA 3 of 4Table 1AC Line Interruption SequenceInterruption Time Interruption Increments(Milliseconds)(Milliseconds)10-10010200-20001002250-50002507.2.2 Document DUT response for each iteration in section 7.4.7.2.3 Repeat the tests of 7.2.1. as necessary for all standby and operational modes of DUT.7.3 AcceptanceCriteria7.3.1 Any DUT response that creates a safety hazard or results in unsafe operation shall constitute atest failure.7.3.2 For short duration interruptions (< 250 mS):7.3.2.1 Standby or Operating modes, the DUT shall continue in its previous mode of operation topreclude nuisance tripping or resets.7.3.3 For interruption duration >250 mS, see the DUT’s (“B”) specification for acceptance criteria.7.3.4 Units controlled by simple (air gap) manual on/off switches shall return to their pre-interruptionoperating mode.ST. JOSEPH, MICHIGAN, 49085, USA 4 of 4 Results7.4 ReportingPower Quality Voltage Interruption Test Date ______________________________Equipment __________________________ Model __________________ Serial ________________Mode ______________________________________________HIT DURATION NOTEmS1 10mS2 20mS3 30mS4 40mS5 506 60mSmS7 70mS8 80mS9 90mS10 100mS11 200mS12 300mS13 400mS14 500mS15 600mS16 70017 800mSmS18 900mS19 1000mS20 1100mS21 1200mS22 1300mS23 1400mS24 1500mS25 1600mS26 1700mS27 180028 1900mSmS29 2000mS30 2250mS31 2500mS32 2750mS33 300034 3250mSmS35 3500mS36 375037 4000mSmS38 4250mS39 450040 4750mSmS41 5000。