FDA 生物指示剂指南
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:189.01 KB
- 文档页数:20
灭菌用生物指示剂指导原则(新增)生物指示剂是一种对特定灭菌程序有确定及稳定的耐受性的特殊微生物制成品,可用于灭菌设备的性能确认、特定物品的灭菌工艺研发及建立、产品灭菌程序的验证、生产过程灭菌效果的监控、灭菌程序的定期再验证、隔离器和无菌洁净室灭菌效果的验证评估等。
生物指示剂的分类生物指示剂主要有以下三种类型,其特征需符合《医疗保健产品灭菌生物指示物》GB18281-的要求。
(1)由微生物芽胞和载体经包装而成,载体可以是碟形或条状的滤纸、玻璃、塑料或其它材料。
载体和内层包装不得含有物理、化学或微生物的污染物,避免影响生物指示剂的性能和稳定性;不得被特定的灭菌工艺降解;能被灭菌介质(蒸汽、射线、化学试剂、过滤等)穿透并使灭菌介质与生物指示剂能充分接触。
载体和包装的设计应保证生物指示剂不受污染、并使其所含的微生物在贮存、运输和使用过程中损失最小,且方便取样、转移和接种。
(2)芽胞悬液生物指示剂,该类生物指示剂是将芽胞混悬于液体中。
若用于液体物品灭菌,建议测定生物指示剂在灭菌液体物品中的芽胞数、D值和Z值。
(3)自含式生物指示剂,该类生物指示剂是由芽孢和能够恢复微生物生长的培养基组成的系统。
系统中的培养基用于培养灭菌后的生物指示剂,应制定程序确认该培养基能保证残存微生物的生长。
自含式生物指示剂的耐受性是针对整个系统而言。
自含式系统所采用的材料不应该含有或在使用过程释放出抑制残存微生物生长的物质。
该系统的设计应能够承受运输和使用过程中的影响,不发生破损,并使原始接种的微生物损失减少到最小。
生物指示剂用微生物的基本要求生物指示剂含有对灭菌模式有明确耐受性的一种或两种微生物。
除了电离辐射外,微生物芽孢较菌体有更强的耐受性。
一般认为含芽胞的细菌更适合用于制备生物指示剂。
不同灭菌工艺使用不同的生物指示剂,制备生物指示剂所选用的微生物应具备以下特征:(1)菌种的耐受性应大于需灭菌物品中所有可能污染菌的耐受性。
(2)菌种应无致病性。
Mesalabs-EZS6生物指示剂说明书mesalabs-ezs/6生物指示剂说明书型号:ezs/6()菌种:嗜冷芽孢脂肪杆菌79531生物指示剂用途:蒸汽灭菌培育:eztest培养基,55-60℃培育。
所提供更多的细菌培养基合乎促发展生长能力的市场需求。
纯度:采用标准平板计数技术时没污染的证据生产批号:s-459生产日期:2021年12月19日失灵日期:2021年12月19日6热冲击计数:2.2×10孢子量/支载体尺寸:6mm×19mm(2)抗力分析:d值存活时间杀灭时间(3)121℃蒸汽2.29.7123.12z值:16.9℃特别注意:杀菌之后,玻璃恩瓿内的生物指示剂冷且具有压力。
应当至少加热10分钟。
加热多于10分钟恩瓿可能将碎裂以及冷的液体所引致的危害。
a灭菌过程使用生物指示剂1.从包装盒中取适量的指示剂。
2.从标签上鉴别生物指示剂的信息。
3.将生物指示剂放到代表性装载的最合适测试外包装中。
4.将测试包装放置在灭菌器的最大挑战区域,通常是在靠近门排水口上方的架子上。
如果没有使用测试包,将生物指示剂放置在装载的水平位置。
5.按正常过程展开装载。
6.将带有生物指示剂的包装从灭菌器移除后应给与足够的时间进行冷却,至少10分钟以上。
7.将生物指示剂从测试的装载中抽出。
8.灭菌后当标签上的化学指示剂由蓝色变为黑色。
与没有进行灭菌的生物指示剂进行区别。
注意:黑色不能表明接受过灭菌。
55-60℃的条件将满足用户指示剂的培育条件。
为了并使指示剂解触培养基,将指示剂以横向边线置放在塑料碎裂器里面。
轻轻地侵蚀碎裂器毁坏玻璃恩瓿。
将与培养基碰触的生物指示剂置放在培养箱的架子上,立即展开培育。
c解释说明:1.在培育至8小时,12小时,18小时和24小时检查生物指示剂的颜色变化。
发生黄色表中明有细菌生长。
没有变化表明经过了适当的灭菌。
2.一旦出现阳性试验(变成黄色)第一时间应当记录下来。
通告医院人员(比如疾病掌控中3.建议的培养时间是24小时(符合usfda/rit协议)。
9207灭菌用生物指示剂指导原则(新增)生物指示剂是一种对特定灭菌程序有确定及稳定的耐受性的特殊微生物制成品,可用于灭菌设备的性能确认、特定物品的灭菌工艺研发及建立、产品灭菌程序的验证、生产过程灭菌效果的监控、灭菌程序的定期再验证、隔离器和无菌洁净室灭菌效果的验证评估等。
生物指示剂的分类生物指示剂主要有以下三种类型,其特征需符合《医疗保健产品灭菌生物指示物》GB18281的要求。
(1)由微生物芽孢和载体经包装而成,载体可以是碟形或条状的滤纸、玻璃、塑料或其它材料。
载体和内层包装不得含有物理、化学或微生物的污染物,避免影响生物指示剂的性能和稳定性;不得被特定的灭菌工艺降解;能被灭菌介质(蒸汽、射线、化学试剂等)穿透并使灭菌介质与生物指示剂能充分接触。
载体和包装的设计应保证生物指示剂不受污染、并使其所含的微生物在贮存、及运输和使用过程中损失最小,且方便取样、转移和接种。
(2)芽孢悬液生物指示剂,该类生物指示剂是将芽孢混悬于液体中。
若用于液体物品灭菌,建议测定生物指示剂在灭菌液体物品中的芽孢数和D值。
(3)自含式生物指示剂,该类生物指示剂是由芽孢和能够恢复微生物生长的培养基组成的系统,其耐受性是针对整个系统而言。
系统中的培养基用于培养灭菌后的生物指示剂,应制定程序确认该培养基能保证残存微生物的生长。
自含式生物指示剂的耐受性是针对整个系统而言。
自含式系统所采用的材料不应该含有或在使用过程释放出抑制残存微生物生长的物质。
该系统的设计应能够承受运输和使用过程中的影响,不发生破损,并使原始接种的微生物损失减少到最小。
生物指示剂用微生物的基本要求除了电离辐射外,微生物芽孢较菌体有更强的耐受性。
一般认为含芽孢的细菌更适合用于制备生物指示剂。
不同灭菌工艺使用不同的生物指示剂,制备生物指示剂所选用的微生物应具备以下特性:(1)菌种的耐受性应大于需灭菌物品中所有可能污染菌的耐受性。
(2)菌种应无致病性。
(3)菌株应稳定,存活期长,易于保存。
美国FDA非肠道用冻干制剂检查指南1993年引言冻干是指药品冷冻后在真空状态下不经液态,直接从固态升华至气态,由此去除水分的作业过程。
该过程包括三个彼此独立又相互依赖的步骤:冷冻、一级干燥(升华)以及二级干燥 (解吸附)。
冻干工艺的优点在于:液体加工方便,简化了无菌作业过程;提高了干粉的稳定性;无需过热处理就能去除产品中的水分;增强了冻干产品的稳定性及复水(溶解)性。
冻干工艺的缺点在于:加工处理过程所需时间长;复水时需用无菌稀释液;设备复杂且生产成本高。
冻干工艺一般包括以下步骤:(1)将药品和赋形剂溶解于适当的溶剂中,通常使用注射用水。
(2)将药液通过一个0.22μm的微孔除菌过滤器,以此灭菌。
(3)灌装到各个已灭菌的容器中,并在无菌条件下半压塞。
(4)在无菌条件下将半压塞的容器转移至冻干腔室内。
(5)冷冻该溶液:把半压塞的容器置于冻干腔室的冷冻搁板上,或在另一腔室内作预冷冻。
(6)将腔室抽真空并将冷冻搁板升温,以便在冷冻状态下通过蒸发除去水分。
(7)全压塞密封:通常由安装在冻干机内的液压式或螺杆式压塞装置来完成。
现在有许多新的非肠道药品,如抗感染药物、生物制剂、体外诊断用药等等都采用冻干工艺来加工。
调查及研究业已发现与冻干工艺及其控制相关的冻干剂在疗效、无菌性和稳定性方面存在问题。
为此,本检查指南对冻干产品有关的生产工艺和缺陷进行了讨论,以便为调研人员提供这方面的信息和指导。
人们已认识到冻干药品的生产和控制是一项很复杂的工艺技术。
冻干作业的重要内容包括药液的制备;西林瓶灌装及其验证;冻干机的灭菌和设计;冻干工艺的放大生产(批量放大)及其验证;最终产品的检验等等。
冻干剂成品生产和控制相关的问题是本文的重点内容。
药品种类和配方药品需经冻干是因为其溶液状态下的不稳定性。
有许多抗生素,如某些半合成的青霉素、头孢菌素和红霉素、强力霉素、氯霉素的盐类都是由冻干工艺制造的。
可以预计在生产过程中这类产品的带菌量很低,因为它们是抗生素。
行业和FDA工作人员指南生物指示剂(BI)上市前通知[510(k)]提交文件发布日期:2007年10月4日本文件草案于2001年5月21日发布本文件替代FDA于1986年1月1日发布的“生物指示剂孵育时间验证指南”。
有关本文件的问题,请联系Dr. Sheila Murphey,电话:240-276-3700,或发送电子邮件至sheila.murphey@美国卫生与公共服务部美国食品药品管理局器械和放射卫生中心感染控制器械分部麻醉科、综合医院、感染控制和口腔器械部器械评价办公室前言公众意见您可以随时提交书面意见和建议供本机构审议,可以邮寄至美国食品和药物监督管理局待审问题管理处,地址:5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, (HFA-305), Rockville, MD, 20852。
或者,您也可以在/dockets/ecomments上提交电子意见。
提交意见时,请引用文档编号2001D-0193。
本机构可能不会立即对您提出的意见作出回应,而是纳入到下一次修订或更新文件中。
额外副本可从互联网上获得额外副本:/cdrh/ode/guidance/1320.pdf。
您还可以发送电子邮件至dsmica@,请求发送本指南的电子副本,或发送传真至240- 276-3151,请求接收传真件。
请使用文件编号(1320)来确定您所需的指南。
目录1. 引言1最简易方法22. 适用范围 23. 定义 34. 器械比较 55. 描述和规格 66. FDA认可的标准77. 性能特征7A. 活孢子种群测定8B. 抗性特性研究8C. 载体和内包装材料评价9D. 保持时间评估10E. 复苏方案10F. 邮寄方案108. 有效期错误!未定义书签。
9. 孵育器1110. 测试包1111. 标签11A. 预期用途11B. 描述12C. 使用说明12D. 注意事项1212.参考文献13 附件I. BI 510(k)检查项目列表14 附件II. 生物指示剂孵育时间的验证示例15行业和FDA工作人员指南生物指示剂(BI)上市前通知[510(k)]提交1.引言FDA规定,旨在用于监测医疗保健机构内使用的灭菌器的生物指示剂(BI),作为II类医疗器械,需要提交上市前通知(510(k))。
美国药典微生物检测精要培训小结一微生物实验室规范重要的控制点:无菌技术、培养基控制、菌种控制、设备操作与控制、数据记录与实验室布局和运作、员工培训等。
1无菌技术:防止和保持无菌物品及无菌区域不被污染的操作方法和管理方法。
可通过无菌环境、灭菌、消毒、卫生要求、无菌操作技术等手段来实现。
2培养基:是微生物实验工作的核心。
包括培养基制备、培养基储存、培养基质量控制。
2.1培养基制备2.1.1根据既定的目的选用正确的培养基2.1.2参考生产商的COA和说明书:关于配制、储存和菌种选用等。
2.1.3所用的水应为去离子水或蒸馏水,应记录用量。
2.1.4成分的称量应用校准过的天平,根据称量量的不同选择合适的天平。
使用清洁的容器和工具(<1051>玻璃器皿清洁)以防外来污染和抑制剂。
应记录称量量。
2.1.5加热帮助溶解时应防止过度加热,通常培养基颜色变深说明加热过度了。
2.1.6灭菌条件:●灭菌参数应验证,验证应同时考虑无菌和培养基生长能力●采用高压蒸汽灭菌或过滤灭菌。
湿热灭菌应考虑装载分布,加热速度过慢会使培养基过度加热,通常为121℃15min,此时间是指培养基温度达到121℃后15min。
●保证最低SAL,在无菌和过度加热之间平衡。
●与污染物分开灭菌●消毒结束后,不应在灭菌柜中储存培养基,过度加热会影响培养基颜色、澄清、pH和凝固能力。
2.2培养基储存2.2.1制备培养基的储存●琼脂培养基易受冷冻影响,低于0℃会破坏凝胶结构。
●应避光避热,密封防止水分蒸发(建议使用螺旋盖的瓶子密封,保存时间长)。
2.2.2培养基融化●不能超过一次,以防过度加热或潜在污染。
●融化可采用水浴、流通蒸汽或微波炉加热。
微波炉加热宜采用少量多次,以防过度。
●培养基融化后在40-50℃水浴中储存不应超过8小时,浇制平皿前应擦干以防污染。
2.2.3培养基标示●培养基名称●批号、制备批号●制备日期、有效期2.2.4有效期确定●根据成分、配方、容器、储存条件等确定●有生长能力试验数据支持2.2.5应在验证过的条件下储存2.2.6重要区域环控用培养基必须●双层包装●最终灭菌,否则进行全数培养及用前检查2.2.7根据当地生物危险品安全程序处置过期培养基2.3培养基质控2.3.1灭菌后培养基检查2.3.1.1生长能力●每批制备的培养基均需进行●测试菌种根据药典,供应商说明书及环境中分离得到●测试不合格应进行调查,如无原因,或无有效纠正措施,不得使用该批号2.3.1.2无菌2.3.1.3pH2.3.1.4容器/平皿的完整性2.3.1.5抑制或指示能力2.3.2定期稳定性检查以确认储存有效期3菌种保藏3.1建立标准程序处理、保存菌种,防止污染和特性变化3.2使用前确认菌种身份和纯度3.3根据生产商说明书复苏菌种,使用接种技术3.4-70℃以下或冷冻干燥保存储备菌种,可延长保存周期3.5开启后不要重新冷冻菌种,剩余部分应弃置3.6传代次数(每接种一次即为一代)不超过5次3.7保藏时间根据具体保藏条件确定4设备维护4.1定期校准、保养4.2定期性能检查4.3定期清洁、消毒5实验室布局和运作5.1防止交叉污染5.2活动分区:无菌、环控样品的处理和培养应在无菌环境中进行5.3当发现微生物生长,后续的工作应转移至“阳性”区5.4环控设备应放置在待取样区域环境中并小心操作5.5应在受控条件下小心取样6样品处理6.1大部分样品、水或环控样品中的微生物对操作、储存环境敏感6.2减少样品,取样与测试间的时间间隔6.3长时间的转移需确认转移条件对测试及样品的影响6.4在无菌条件下,使用无菌技术取样,即使是非无菌样品6.5取样记录:样品信息、取样日期、送样日期、人员/部门、实验室样品接受及确认7培养基培养时间7.1短于3天,用小时表示7.2长于3天,用天表示(上午、下午,相同时间段)8人员培训8.1每个岗位应有相应培训要求,进行上岗前资质确认9实验室文件9.1微生物人员培训和能力确认(上岗资质)9.2设备验证、校准和维护9.3测试中的设备性能(如温度记录)9.4培养基制备、无菌检查、生长能力测试、选择性测试9.5培养基清单与控制9.6根据程序(SOP)进行测试的重要数据9.7数据和计算的确认9.8经QA人员或相应领导审核过的报告9.9超标结果调查10实验室结果维护10.1检测报告至少应包括:●日期●测试样品●微生物检验人员名字●程序编号●测试结果●偏差(如有)●测试参数(设备、菌种、培养基)●管理人员审核签名10.2数据纠错:错误的地方划一横线,签名和日期,必要时说明原因10.3测试结果●应包含平皿计数结果(如有)●数据分析方法应罗列在相关SOP中●对粘贴的图表、数据骑缝签名10.4存档:记录应存档并防止丢失,应有记录留存计划11测试结果解释11.1微生物数据有时不容易解释●与人类相关的微生物群落被广泛的用于许多测试●人员污染是始终被关心的问题●样品或环境中的微生物并非均匀分布●微生物检测可变范围大:可能在+/-0.5log10单位左右11.2不符合的结果可能是由2个原因造成的:实验室错误或产品不符合。
美国FDA药品质量控制微生物实验室检查指南1993年I.导言《药品质量控制实验室检查指南》主要涉及许多有关药品实验室分析的化学方面的问题,对微生物实验室的检查仅提供了有限的指导,而本指南则是微生物分析检查过程的指导。
本指南建议,如同对任何实验室检查—样,在检查微生物实验室时,应有—名熟悉检验的分析学家(微生物学家)参与。
II.非无菌药品的微生物检验由于种种原因,局部药品、滴鼻剂和吸入剂存在许多微生物污染方面的问题.美国药典‘‘微生物属性”章(1111)指出“应该从药品用法、药品性质及时患者的潜在危害等方面评价微生物在非无菌药品中的重要性”,除此之外,没有提供具体的指导。
美国药典还建议应对某些种类的非无菌药品做常规的总菌数检验及某些特定的污染指示微生物的检验:例如:植物、动物和某些矿物质中的沙门氏菌属;口服液体中的大肠杆菌;局部用药品小的金黄色倘萄球菌和绿脓杆菌污染;以及:自肠、尿道、阴道用药中的酵母菌和霉菌:大量的专题文章还沦及厂微生物的限度。
作为非无菌药品受微生物污染的可接受程度和类型的—般性指导,美国食品和药品管理局药品分局的邓尼根博士曾强调其对健康的危害问题。
1970年他提出被革兰氏阴性细菌污染的局部制剂可能引起中度至重度的健康危害:文献和调查表明,许多感染都源于这种局部药品的革兰氏阴性细菌污染。
几年前马萨诸塞州的—家医院就报道过—宗络合碘(Povidonelodine)被洋葱假恤孢菌(Pseudomonas cepacia)污染的典型病例。
因此,每家公司都希望为自己的非无菌药品制订出一种关于微生物限度的标准,美国药典中“微生物限度”(USP61)提供了检验几种指示微生物的方法,但并末涉及所有有害微生物。
例如医药界普遍认为,洋葱假中孢菌在局部药品或滴鼻剂斗,大量存在是有害的,但美国药典没有提供证明这种微生物存在的检验方法。
间羟异丙肾上腺素硫酸盐吸入剂溶液的收回就是这方面的—个例子。
美国药典第XⅫ版各论部分没有要求对这种药品进行微生物检验。
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Biological Indicator (BI) Premarket Notification [510(k)] SubmissionsDocument issued on: October 4, 2007The draft of this document was issued May 21, 2001This document supersedes FDA Guide for Validation of Biological IndicatorIncubation Time, January 1, 1986For questions regarding this document contact Dr. Sheila Murphey at 240-276-3700 or by email at sheila.murphey@U.S. Department Of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationCenter for Devices and Radiological HealthInfection Control Devices Branch Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control, and Dental DevicesOffice of Device EvaluationPrefacePublic CommentWritten comments and suggestions may be submitted at any time for Agency consideration to the Division of Dockets Management, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, (HFA-305), Rockville, MD, 20852. Alternatively, electronic comments may be submitted to /dockets/ecomments. When submitting comments, please refer to Docket No. 2001D-0193. Comments may not be acted upon by the Agency until the document is next revised or updated.Additional CopiesAdditional copies are available from the Internet at:/cdrh/ode/guidance/1320.pdf. You may also send an e-mail request to dsmica@ to receive an electronic copy of the guidance or send a fax request to 240-276-3151 to receive a hard copy. Please use the document number (1320) to identify the guidance you are requesting.Table of Contents1. INTRODUCTION 1THE LEAST BURDENSOME APPROACH 22. SCOPE 23. DEFINITIONS 3COMPARISON 54. DEVICE5. DESCRIPTION AND SPECIFICATIONS 6STANDARDS 7 6. FDA-RECOGNIZEDCHARACTERISTICS 77. PERFORMANCEA.Viable Spore Population Assay 8B.Resistance Characteristics Study 8C.Carrier and Primary Packaging Materials Evaluation 9D.Holding Time Assessment 10E.Recovery Protocols 10F.Mail-In Protocols 10LIFE 108. SHELF9. INCUBATORS 11PACKS 1110. TEST11. LABELING 11A.Intended Use 11B.Description 12C.Instructions for Use 12D.Precautions 1212. REFERENCES 13 ATTACHMENT I – BI 510(K) CHECKLIST 14 ATTACHMENT II - RECOMMENDED VALIDATION OF BIOLOGICAL INDICATOR INCUBATION TIME 15Guidance for Industry and FDA StaffBiological Indicator (BI) PremarketNotification [510(k)] SubmissionsThis guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance.1. IntroductionFDA regulates biological indicators (BI) intended to monitor sterilizers used in health care facilities as class II medical devices requiring premarket notification (510(k)). 21 CFR880.2800(a). This guidance document provides information that will help manufacturers prepare 510(k)s for BIs used with conventional sterilization methods. FDA believes that providing this information will promote a consistent and efficient regulatory process.The effective performance of sterilizers used in health care facilities is important to help prevent nosocomial infections. BIs can provide sterilizer users with information on the effectiveness of sterilizer processes. The use of comprehensive, scientifically sound criteria to evaluate BIs helps ensure the performance of these devices. This guidance document draws upon long-standing scientific principles used to evaluate BIs. It was produced through interaction with industry, government, academia, and health care professionals.This document supplements other FDA documents regarding the specific content requirements of a 510(k) submission. You should also refer to: 21 CFR 807.87; the guidance, Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s;1 and the section of CDRH’s Device Advice, Premarket Notification 510(k).2In addition, The New 510(k) Paradigm - Alternate Approaches to Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications,3 describes options for submitting either1 /cdrh/ode/guidance/1567.html.2 /cdrh/devadvice/314.html.3 /cdrh/ode/parad510.html.an Abbreviated 510(k) or a Special 510(k), in lieu of a Traditional 510(k). FDA believes an Abbreviated 510(k) provides the least burdensome means of demonstrating substantial equivalence for a new device, particularly once FDA has issued a guidance document addressing that device. Manufacturers considering certain modifications to their own cleared devices may lessen the regulatory burden by submitting a Special 510(k).The Least Burdensome ApproachThe issues identified in this guidance document represent those that we believe need to beaddressed before your device can be marketed. In developing the guidance, we carefullyconsidered the relevant statutory criteria for Agency decision-making. We also considered the burden that may be incurred in your attempt to follow the guidance and address the issues we have identified. We believe that we have considered the least burdensome approach toresolving the issues presented in the guidance document. If, however, you believe that there is a less burdensome way to address the issues, you should follow the procedures outlined in the A Suggested Approach to Resolving Least Burdensome Issues,/cdrh/modact/leastburdensome.html.FDA's guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency's current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.2. ScopeThis document provides guidance concerning the content and format of 510(k) submissions forBIs intended to monitor sterilization processes used in health care facilities (product code, FRC). These are Class II devices identified under 21 CFR 880.2800(a):A biological sterilization process indicator is a device intended for use by a health careprovider to accompany products being sterilized through a sterilization procedure and tomonitor adequacy of sterilization. The device consists of a known number ofmicroorganisms, of a known resistance to the mode of sterilization, in or on a carrier andenclosed in a protective package. Subsequent growth or failure of the microorganisms togrow under suitable conditions indicates the adequacy of sterilization.FDA encourages you to contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International, and Consumer Assistance (DSMICA) or the Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control, and Dental Devices (DAGID) representatives with any questions you may have before submitting a 510(k) for a BI.ExclusionsThis document does not address the following sterilization process indicators or related products:•physical/chemical sterilization process indicators (JOJ, LRT, MTC) identified under21 CFR 880.2800(b)•BIs intended for use in a manufacturing setting•BIs intended for use in liquid chemical sterilization (product code MRB).3. DefinitionsThe following are definitions of terms used throughout the document. Many of the definitions have been standardized by organizations such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Complete citations for these standards are in section 12, “References.”Biological Indicator (BI): Microbiological test system providing a defined resistance to a specified sterilization process (AAMI, 2006a).Carrier: Supporting material onto which indicator organisms are deposited (AAMI 2006b).Chemical Indicator: System that reveals change in one or more predefined process variables based on a chemical or physical change resulting from exposure to a process. (ISO, 2006)D-value: (decimal reduction value): Time or radiation dose required to achieve inactivation of 90% of a population of the test microorganism under stated exposure conditions (AAMI 2006a).4Death Rate Curve (or Survivor Curve): The graphic representation of inactivation against increasing exposure to stated conditions (AAMI, 2006a).Inactivation: Loss of the ability of indicator organisms to germinate, outgrow, and/or multiply under specified culture conditions (AAMI, 2006a).Inoculated Carrier: Specified material onto which a defined number of test organisms have been deposited (AAMI, 2006a).4 This is the definition for D-value in the standard cited. However, radiation sterilization is not discussed in this guidance document because it is not a sterilization method generally used in health care facilities.Medical Device: As defined in Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 USC§321(h)):[a]n instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant,in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including anycomponent, part, or accessory, which is-1. recognized in the official National Formulary, or the UnitedStates Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them,2. intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or otherconditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or preventionof disease, in man or other animals, or3. intended to affect the structure or any function of the bodyof man or other animals, andwhich does not achieve its primary intended purposes throughchemical action within or on the body of man or other animals andwhich is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement ofits primary intended purposes.Pack, Primary: System that protects the inoculated carrier from damage and contamination without preventing penetration of the sterilizing agent(s) (AAMI, 2006b).Pack, Secondary: Container system in which BIs are packed for transport and storage (AAMI, 2006b).Resistometer: A test instrument designed to rapidly produce and precisely control critical parameters associated with a given sterilization process.5, 6Sterile: Free from viable microorganisms (AAMI, 2006a).Sterility Assurance Level (SAL): Probability of a single viable microorganism occurring on product after sterilization (AAMI, 2006a).Sterilization: Validated process used to render a product free of all forms of viable microorganisms (AAMI, 2006a).5 In addition to routine quality system testing of indicator performance consistency, a resistometer is used to characterize cause and effect relationships associated with a given sterilization process and devices used to evaluate the efficacy of the sterilization process.6 Resistometers were formerly referred to as Biological Indicator Evaluator Resistometer (BIER) or Chemical Indicator Evaluator Resistometer test systems (AAMI 2002).Survivor Curve: The graphic representation of inactivation against increasing exposure to stated conditions (AAMI, 2006c).Survival/Kill Window: Extent of exposure to a sterilization process under defined conditions when there is a transition from all BIs showing growth (survival exposure) to all BIs showing no growth (kill exposure) (AAMI, 2006c).Test Pack (Process Challenge Device): Item designed to simulate products to be sterilized and to constitute a defined challenge to the sterilization process and used to assess the effective performance of the process (AAMI, 2006a)Z-value: For a thermal sterilization process, the change in exposure temperature that corresponds to a 10-fold change in D-value (AAMI, 2006b).4. Device ComparisonFDA recommends that you include a section or table comparing the new device to the legally marketed predicate device. The following table is an example of the type of information that you should provide. (See Section VI below for additional information you should provide in your 510(k)).Table 1 – Device ComparisonELEMENT NEW DEVICE PREDICATE Intended use•method of sterilization•process parametersOrganism•spore•species•strainViable spore populationResistance characteristics:•D-value•Z-value (thermal only)•Survival/Kill WindowShelf-life5. Description and SpecificationsYou should provide a detailed description of the BI. The description should include the general characteristics of the device design as well as the manufacturing specifications. The bulleted list below is an example of the types of information that you should provide for your device.•indicator organism, genus, species, and strain•type of BI, e.g., self contained or paper strip•intended sterilization process, cycle, and parameters•resistance characteristics: D-values, survival/kill times, Z-values (thermal only)•specification for spore population•shelf-life•carrier material and primary packaging material•description of the culture medium (for self contained BIs)•identification of the media, growth, and culture conditions (for non self contained BIs).Generally, the following spores are used for the sterilization methods listed below in Table 2.Table 2 – Recommended Spores for Sterilization ProcessSTERILIZATION PROCESS SPORE (INDICATOR ORGANISM)SteamGeobacillus stearothermophilus (formerly Bacillus stearothermophilus)Dry HeatBacillus atrophaeus (formerly Bacillus subtilis var. niger)Ethylene OxideBacillus atrophaeus (formerly Bacillus subtilis var. niger)Hydrogen PeroxideGeobacillus stearothermophilus (formerly Bacillus stearothermophilus)For BIs used in sterilization methods other than those listed, you should demonstrate that the BI used for validation is the most resistant to the process. Alternatively, you should reference published scientific studies indicating that the subject BI is the most resistant to the process. If you use an organism for a sterilization process that is not specified in Table 2, you shouldprovide test data to demonstrate that the subject microorganism is at least as or more resistant than that listed in Table 2.6. FDA-Recognized StandardsIf any part of the device design or testing relies on a recognized standard, we recommend that you include either:• a statement that testing will be conducted and meet specified acceptance criteria before the device is marketed or• a declaration of conformity to the standard.7Because a declaration of conformity is based on results from testing, we believe you cannot properly submit a declaration of conformity until you have completed the testing the standard describes. For more information, please refer to section 514(c)(1)(B) of the Act and the FDA guidance, Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determinations; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA.8Recognized standards that apply to BIs are discussed in the following sections.7. Performance CharacteristicsFDA recommends that you provide the following information in your 510(k).•clear statement of the study objective(s)•description of the equipment and media used to evaluate the BI, including the results of the growth promotion studies•enumeration of viable spore populations•resistance characteristics of the final finished product, as appropriate to the sterilization method (e.g., D-value, Z-value, survival/kill window)•sterilization methods, cycle parameters, and exposure times•determination of growth inhibition of carrier and primary packaging•assessment of sterilant neutralization effectiveness, if neutralization is required•positive/negative controls•summary of study results•conclusions reached based upon study results.7 See Required Elements for a Declaration of Conformity to a Recognized Standard (Screening Checklist for All Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions), /cdrh/ode/reqrecstand.html.8 /cdrh/ode/guidance/1131.html.FDA recommends that performance studies include statistically valid sample sizes and are conducted on at least 3 different spore lots, prepared from different spore crops. You should conduct the performance studies discussed below.A.Viable Spore Population AssayYou should provide assay results to demonstrate that the product meets its specification for the spore population. For examples of assay methods, refer to the applicable United States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards and FDA recognized standards (see 12. References). See also Table 3Recommended Minimum Populations and Resistance Characteristics.B.Resistance Characteristics StudyYou should provide the resistance characteristics of the BI in the specified sterilizationprocess and cycle, using a resistometer. We recommend that you perform all testing on only final finished products. We also recommend that the resistometer used for thecharacterization of the BI conform with the current ANSI/AAMI standard for resistometers.If no resistometer exists for the sterilization process being evaluated, we recommend using actual production sterilizers with the critical cycle parameters controlled to the extentpossible during testing. You should document that testing parameters were adequatelycontrolled and explain how this was achieved. If you conduct resistance characteristicsstudies using sterilizers that do not routinely monitor all critical parameters, we recommend that you add external monitors to document evidence of adequate control.D-valueFor test methods for determining BI resistance characteristics, please refer toANSI/AAMI ST 59 or equivalent method.For non self-contained BIs, you should plot the D-values for a representative range (e.g., 115°C, 120°C, 125°C, 130°C) to determine the D-value for different thermal exposuretemperatures. If the curve demonstrates linearity, the BI is suitable for the full range ofcycle temperatures.For self-contained BIs, you should calculate the D-value at each proposed temperature.Z-valueYou should provide Z-values for thermal processes. FDA generally recommends that BIs have a minimum Z-value of 10°C.To determine the Z-value, you should construct a thermal resistance curve. The thermal resistance curve is a semi-logarithmic graph of D-value vs. temperature. The Z-valuecan be obtained from the slope of the curve by calculating the number of degrees oftemperature for a 1-logarithm change in D-value. The greater the number oftemperatures studied, the more accurate the resulting Z-value. FDA recommends thatstudies use at least three different temperatures (Pflug, 1990).Survival/Kill WindowYou should conduct a study to verify the calculated survival/kill window. USP providesan acceptable test method. The minimum expected survival time and maximum expectedkill time can be calculated from the following equations (USP):Minimum Expected Survival Time)(2 - population spore viable log value -D Than Less Not Time Survival 10×=Maximum Expected Kill Time)( 4 population spore viable log value -D Than More Not Time Kill 10+×= Table 3 below lists examples of the resistance characteristics of 510(k) cleared BIs withminimum populations, D-values, and the survival times.Table 3 - Recommended Minimum Populations and Resistance CharacteristicsSTERILZATIONCYCLEVIABLE SPORE POPULATION D-VALUE Z-VALUE SURVIVAL TIME Steam 121°C105 1.5 min 10°C 5 min Steam 132°C10510 s 10°C 1 min Steam 134°C or 135°C1058 s 10°C 40 s Ethylene Oxide600 mg/L, 60% RH,54°C106 3 min A 15 min Dry heat 160°C 106 3 min A 12 minA Not applicable.C. Carrier and Primary Packaging Materials EvaluationYou should evaluate the effects of carrier and packaging materials on the resistancecharacteristics of the BI. Please refer to ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11138-1 Annex B for examples of methods that may be used.D.Holding Time AssessmentHolding time is the length of time that the exposed BI is held before incubation. You should evaluate the effect of the labeled holding time on the resistance characteristics and spore recovery.E.Recovery ProtocolsYou should identify the recovery media and evaluate all recovery protocols to validate the incubation time. Generally, FDA recommends 7 days as the conventional incubation time for BIs used to monitor the traditional sterilization processes listed in Table 2. To validate incubation times of less than 7 days, see Examples of Validation of Biological Indicator Incubation Time in Attachment II.For self contained BIs, you should also evaluate the effect of the sterilization process on the recovery medium.F.Mail-In ProtocolsSome manufacturers market BIs as part of a monitoring service; the user mails the exposed BI to the manufacturer (or laboratory) to incubate and read. The handling required by the monitoring service may impact adversely upon the BI resistance. Therefore, labeling for BIs marketed as part of a monitoring service should detail the handling protocol. The handling protocol should be validated.8. Shelf LifeYou should demonstrate that the specifications (e.g., D-value, spore population) are maintained throughout the labeled shelf life of the device. For all studies, FDA recommends that you use at least 3 lots from 3 different spore crops of BI and a statistically significant sample size. You should use storage conditions described in the device labeling.You should provide the following information about shelf life:•labeled shelf life•dates and length of time for each testing interval, e.g., 0, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years•resistometer vessel results for each testing interval demonstrating that the established endpoints are maintained.BIs may be unstable at elevated temperatures; therefore, FDA believes accelerated aging studies may be inappropriate.In lieu of complete real time shelf life data, the FDA will consider preliminary real time shelf life data (e.g., 6 months) along with a detailed protocol and sampling plan for an ongoing real time(e.g., 2 years) study that you intend to continue after your device is cleared. These study protocols should include the shelf life information listed above. You should document the results in your design history file as a part of the Quality System Regulations (21 CFR 820.30).9. IncubatorsBI labeling may recommend a suitable incubator. Alternatively, labeling may recommend incubation conditions and allow users to select an appropriate incubator. FDA considers incubators without specific claims to be general purpose laboratory equipment regulated under 21 CFR 862.2050 as Class I exempt. A 510(k) may be required for incubators that are dedicated for a specific BI or make specific performance claims that go beyond incubation.However, incubator performance is an important aspect in BI validation. Some (typically self-contained) BIs are marketed as part of a system that includes an incubator. A 510(k) for this kind of BI should include a certification that any incubator sold as part of a system maintains the operating temperature specifications under all potential loading conditions over the recommended incubation time.10. Test packsBIs may be used in test packs to simulate products being sterilized.9 Test packs are intended to simulate products and constitute a defined challenge to the sterilization process that is equal to or greater than the most difficult item routinely processed. For BIs indicated for use in specific test packs, you should demonstrate that the performance of the BI in that test pack is equivalent to the performance of the AAMI reference BI in the same test pack in their respective sterilization processes. You should also demonstrate that the BI test pack provides a greater challenge to the process than the BI itself.11. LabelingThe premarket notification must include labeling in sufficient detail to satisfy the requirements of 21 CFR 807.87(e). The following suggestions are aimed at assisting you in preparing labeling that satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 801.10A.Intended UseWe recommend that the intended use describe:•method of sterilization9 These test packs are also called process challenge devices (PCDs).10 Although final labeling is not required for 510(k) clearance, final labeling must comply with the requirements of 21 CFR Part 801 before a medical device is introduced into interstate commerce. Labeling recommendations in this guidance are consistent with the requirements of part 801.•sterilization cycle•exposure time•temperature•sterilant concentration•any other information specific to the intended use of your device.B.DescriptionWe recommend that the labeling provide a description of the device. The description should include:•genus, species, and strain•lot/batch number•type of BI (paper strip, self-contained, size of paper carrier)•D- value and method used to determine it (see also D. Precautions below)•Z-value (thermal processes only)•survival/kill time under the conditions specified•total viable spore count, including whether the count had been determined after preliminary heat treatment•expiration information.C.Instructions for UseWe recommend that your instructions for use include:•sterilization method, cycle, and exposure time•instructions for interpreting results•instructions for disposal, e.g., “sterilize by steam 121°C for not less than 30 minutes”•instructions for spore recovery, e.g., incubation time, culture conditions, type of media.For self contained BIs, we also recommend that the labeling state whether the supplied bacteriological medium will meet requirements for growth promoting ability.D.PrecautionsThe labeling should advise users that the manufacturer’s D-value cannot be duplicated in the healthcare facility, for example:The D-value is reproducible only under the exact test laboratory resistometer conditions under which it was determined. The user would not necessarily obtain the same result.12. ReferencesAAMI 2006a. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Sterilization of health care products-Vocabulary. ANSI/AAMI/ISO TIR11139:2006.AAMI. 2006b. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Sterilization of health care products-Biological indicators-Part 1: General requirement.ANSI/AAMI/ISO ST11138-1:2006.AAMI.2006c. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Sterilization of health care products- Biological indicators- Part 4: Biological indicators for dry heat sterilization processes. ANSI/AAMI/ISO ST11138-4:2006.ISO. 2006. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Sterilization of health care products Biological and Chemical Indicators Test Equipment. ISO 18472:2006.Pflug, I. J. 1990. Microbiology and engineering of sterilization processes. Environmental Sterilization Laboratory, 100 Union Street, Minneapolis, MN 55455.United States Pharmacopeia (USP) & National Formulary. USP 30 (2007) or current edition of the following:USP Biological Indicator for Dry-Heat Sterilization, Paper CarrierUSP Biological Indicator for Ethylene Oxide Sterilization, Paper CarrierUSP Biological Indicator for Steam Sterilization, Paper CarrierUSP Biological Indicator for Steam Sterilization, Self Contained。