商法3
- 格式:doc
- 大小:43.50 KB
- 文档页数:3
三商法是传销组织为了自圆其说,让人信服而一种商业模式。
一商法:柜台→→→10+10+10+10+10=50它是以柜台的形式出现,货物死气沉沉地摆放在柜台里等着四面八方的顾客前来购买,卖出一份货物产生一份效益,卖出十万份货物产生十万份效益.没有顾客的来临也就没有效益的产生。
商业学家给它一组很形象的数字比喻:五个十相加等于50.由于历史的车轮不断不断向前发展,这种守株待兔的卖货方式已跟不上时代的潮流,于是就出现了二商法.二商法:公司雇佣/被雇佣员工5%――――-30% 10*1+10*2+10*3+10*4+10*5=150二商法与一商法不同之处在于,它是以公司的形式出现,给它卖货的是一名叫员工的,它们之间是雇佣与被雇佣的关系,公司的倒闭直接面临着员工的下岗及待业, 公司会根据这名员工能力的大小给出5%――-30%作为报酬,换句话说,如果这名员工有能力就可以赚取这30%,如果没有能力的话连这最基本的5%都赚取不到.商业学家同样给它一组很形象的数字比喻:10*1+10*2+10*3+10*4+10*5=150.由于这是典型的背包上门的卖货方式,不被广大消费者所认同,于是很快就出现了三商法.三商法: 公司合作业务员15%――――60%三商法与二商法相同之同样是以公司的形式出现.而给它卖货的不是叫员工的而是叫业务员的.它们之间是合作的关系,所为合作就是合得来就做,合不来就不做.公司的倒闭跟这名业务员毫无关系,公司也会根据这名业务员加入公司的晋升级别不同给出15%――――60%的报酬,得到的收入也是相当可观的.商业学家也同样给出一组形象的数字比喻: 1 2 3 4 510 + 10 +10 +10 +10 =111110何为十的一次方呢?就是你一个人没有过能力卖货可以找十个有能力的人帮你卖货,这是典型的蠢材利用人才把自己顶升为天才的卖货方式.大家不难从这三组数据中看出:这三商法较二商法较一商法不知道要先进多少倍.上面是书面解释也是传销里面必背的东西您是匿名提问我就告诉你不要做传销当然你是有什么特殊打算除外要是后面还给你讲小明和小芳的故事白花花的样聪明的聪字=======忠告最好别去要是去了听完7天课后认真考虑3天再做决定,要是决定一定做了建议3月内你的人没来就别做了最好的方法是要做前先看看你的朋友,或者说你觉得有多少人能信任你能来再决定不要相信上线会给你放人那是不可能的。
第三章国际货物买卖法第一节国际货物买卖法概说一、调整国际货物买卖的相关法律《联合国国际货物买卖合同公约》两个海牙公约各国国内法调整国际货物买卖的国际惯例二、关于《联合国国际货物买卖合同公约》1、适用范围有体物的买卖。
不适用:(1)不被视为货物或有争议的货物。
如公债、股票、投资证券、流通票据和货物的买卖;(2)不视为动产的货物,如船舶、船只、气垫船或飞机的买卖;(3)购买供私人、家人或家庭使用的货物买卖;(4)以拍卖形式进行的买卖;(5)根据法律执行令状或其他令状的买卖;(6)电力的买卖。
2、适用条件适用于营业地在不同国家的当事人之间订立的销售合同,如果这些国家是缔约国。
所谓营业地,是指固定的、永久的、独立进行营业的场所,不包括代表机构所在地。
3、不涉及的事项(1)买卖合同的效力或惯例的效力等问题;(2)买卖合同对所出售的货物的所有权可能产生的影响;(3)出售的货物引起的人身伤亡或损害责任问题;但卖方所售货物造成人身伤亡之外的损失,公约适用。
4、公约不具有强制性,即使双方当事人营业地分处公约的两个缔约国只要当事人在合同中约定不适用公约,就可排除对公约的适用。
第二节国际货物买卖合同的成立一、合同的通常形式正式合同确认书协议书二、合同的主要内容国际货物买卖合同一般由前文、正文、结尾三部分组成。
1.合同的前文。
又称约首它通常由以下部分组成:(1)合同的名称;(2)合同的编号;(3)订约的日期;(4)订约的地点;(5)订约的当事人名称、地址;(6)订约的理由。
2.合同的基本条款。
合同的基本条款是明确当事人之间权利、义务关系的部分,是合同的核心部分。
主要有:(1)商品名称;(2)品质条款。
一般采取约定品质的方式,通常有:“凭样品买卖”、“凭牌号或商标买卖”;(3)数量条款;(4)价格条款;(5)包装条款;(6)保险条款;(7)交货条款;(8)支付条款;(9)检验条款。
3.合同的一般条款。
合同的一般条款是对基本条款的补充说明或某一类合同的共同事项记载。
思考与练习答案第 1 章导论、填空题1.商事组织2.国际贸易术语解释通则2010 年修订本》,《跟单信用证统一惯例2007 年修订本》3. 国际公约国际贸易惯例4. 成文法系统化条理化法典化逻辑性5. 联邦法州法二、判断题三、单项选择题四、多项选择题1.A D2.ACD3.BC4.ABC5.ABCD五、简答题略。
案例讨论如果甲方是中国籍的企业,则甲方与乙方签订的合同不具有国际性,应适用中国法律;如果甲方是外国籍企业,则甲方与乙方签订的合同具有国际性,可以适用合同中约定的法律,即韩国法律。
第 2 章合同法、填空题1.合意,允诺2.给付不能,给付延迟3. 违反条件,违反担保4. 民法典,债务法典5. 实际给予,答应给予二、单项选择题A B D C A B A C C C C三、多项选择题1.CD2.ACD3.ABCE4.AB5.ABE6.ABCD四、判断题五、简答题略。
六、论述题略。
案例讨论1.(1)甲传真订货行为的性质属于要约邀请。
因该传真欠缺价格条款,邀请乙报价, 故不具有要约性质。
乙报价行为的性质属于要约。
甲回复报价行为的性质属于承诺。
(2)买卖合同成立。
虽双方未按约定签订书面合同,但乙已实际履行合同义务,甲亦接受,未及时提出异议,故合同成立。
(3)乙可向人民法院提出行使撤销权的请求,撤销甲的放弃到期债权、无偿转让财产的行为,以维护其权益。
对撤销权的时效, 《合同法》规定,撤销权应自债权人知道或者应当知道撤销事由之日起1年内行使,自债务人的行为发生之日起5年内未行使撤销权的,该权利消灭。
2 . (1) A公司与B公司签订的加工承揽合同成立。
A公司虽未在加工承揽合同上签章,但已经实际履行了主要义务,且B公司已经接受,加工承揽合同成立。
(2)C公司可向A公司主张加工承揽合同的权利。
根据《合同法》的规定,当事人订立合同后分立的,除债权人和债务人另有约定的以外,由分立的法人或者其他组织对合同的权利和义务享有连带债权、承担连带债务。
海商法3-海上货物运输合同1. 引言海上货物运输合同是指承运人和托运人之间就海上运输货物的合同。
在国际贸易中,海上货物运输合同是非常重要的,它规定了双方的权利和义务,保障了货物的安全和及时交付。
本文将对海上货物运输合同进行详细介绍。
2. 合同的内容和要素海上货物运输合同包括以下内容和要素:2.1 托运人和承运人的基本信息合同应当明确托运人和承运人的名称、地质、等基本信息,以便双方之间的沟通和联系。
2.2 货物的描述和数量合同应当准确描述货物的种类、数量、重量、尺寸等信息,以便承运人正确处理和运输货物。
2.3 运输方式和路线合同应当明确货物的运输方式,例如船舶运输、集装箱运输等,以及运输的路线和途径港口等信息。
2.4 运费和费用合同应当明确运输货物的费用,包括运费、装卸费、保险费等,以便双方协商和支付。
2.5 运输时间和交付地点合同应当明确货物的运输时间和交付地点,以确保货物能够按时到达目的地。
2.6 保险责任和索赔处理合同应当明确双方在运输过程中的保险责任和索赔处理方式,以便在意外情况下能够保护双方的合法权益。
3. 合同的履行和争议解决3.1 合同的履行合同的履行包括货物的装卸、运输、交付等环节,双方应当按照合同的约定和国际贸易惯例进行操作。
3.2 争议的解决如果在合同履行过程中发生争议,双方可以通过友好协商、仲裁或诉讼等方式进行解决。
国际贸易中常采用仲裁的方式解决争议,以提高效率和降低成本。
4. 合同的法律适用和管辖4.1 法律适用海上货物运输合同的法律适用通常依据双方的选择和相关的国际公约或国际惯例。
4.2 管辖合同中可以约定争议解决的管辖法院或仲裁机构,以确保争议能够在合适的司法管辖区内解决。
5.海上货物运输合同是保障货物安全和及时交付的重要工具,在国际贸易中具有重要的地位和作用。
通过合同的订立,托运人和承运人能够明确各自的权利和义务,规范双方的行为,最终实现交易的顺利完成。
在海商法中对海上货物运输合同的规定和解释非常重要,切实维护了合同双方的合法权益。
Case study 11. List the main business organization recognized by Scots Law.Sole trader; Partnership; Limited Partnership; Limited Liability Partnership; Private Company; Public Company2. Give the fact that Lisa will be running the business herself and for the time being, she is unlikely to be employing anyone, how would you classify her business?Lisa engages in a small business activity, the business organization which suits Lisa most is sole trader. The organization style of Lisa’s company does not mention that the business is limited by shares or by guarantee. In this case, the business organization that suit Lisa most is Sole Trader.3. Identify tow advantages and two disadvantages of the type of business organization run by Lisa优点advantages:(1)The simplest method of business organization has admitted by England.(2)Self-employed. There is no difference in laws between sole trader and other business.(3)Comply with the basic legal requirements: submit income tax returns to Inland Revenue, Business Names Act 1985 has disclosure requirements.(4)All people control the company completely, they don’t consider others opinion (shareholders, members or partners)缺点disadvantages:(1)Poor management of enterprises, and undertake unlimited liability to the third party.(2)It is hard to expand operations, and can’t to sell stock as a way to other parties financing.(3)Because of they will be asked to participate in business, so expand business operations would lead to control power to the new partners, shareholders or other members(4)The new partner, shareholder or other members provide funding, they participate in it will change the nature of business operations, and become the partnership and corporate body, such as public/private companies or a limited liability partnership.Case study 21.What are the main difference between a traditional partnership and a liability partnership?Partnership: unincorporated business needn’t to be registered with Registrar of Companies and no need to supply formal documents. They should be adjustment by Partnership Act 1890, Partners have unlimited liability in respect of partnership debts partnership undertake the unlimited liability to the partnership's debts.Limited Liability Partnership: It is corporate body and it must be registered with the Registrar of Companies and certain documents must be supplied. It should be regulated by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000. The members enjoy limited liability in respect of LLP debts/liabilities.2.What is the main advantage for an existing partnership when it changes to a limited liability partnership?There are many traditional partnerships due to detect the advantages of limited partnership, even if this organization has more strict requirements on the members and would lose much privacy. For example, the company must be registered and the requirements for the company's audit should be stricter. However, the traditional from partnership to limited liability partnership makes the shareholders undertake limited liabilities and can deduce their burdens, and it also does well to income to positivity of investment.3. What is the nature of the legal relationship between partners in a firm and members of a limited liability partnership?The legal relationship between partners and the enterprises is interpreted as a fiduciary relationship. The relation between partners and the enterprises is agency relation and there are also agent relations between partners.In the case of Pillans Brothers v Pillans [1908], one of the partners in a business which manufactured nuts and bolts bought another nutand bolt factory. Just four miles away and began to trade on his own account.The court held that he had to account to the partnership for the profits made in this business.From the case, we can know that the legal relationship between partners in an enterprise is interpreted a fiduciary relationship. Section 6 of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 states that the members of an LLP are to be regarded as the agents of the business and it is a general rule of the law of agency that an agent (the partners) must always act in the best interest of his principal. However, which must be indicated is that a member is not an agent of his fellow members.Case study 31.What is a company’s objectives clause?A company’s objects clause can be f ound in from its Memorandum of Association. A company’s objects clause is based on the list explain the company could engage in commercial activities or business behaviors. Before reforms of the Companies Act 1989, company could not entered the commercial and business which were not listed in the object clause, the contract would be void because of the com pany’s lack of capacity to enter such an agreement and if the third party was harmed for ignoring the contract of the object clause ,there was no defence . Now, many companies would directly in the object clauses stipulate the company could undertake any form of business activities or trading to avoid these restrictions.2.Does MacGregor have the right to withdraw from the project with Constrctit?MacGregor Company has no right to cancel the contract relationship with Constructit. According to the Section 35 of the Companies Act 1985, establish the contract and not be recognized as in vain when the company exceeds the Memorandum of Association of objects clause. Section 35B of the Companies Act 1985 goes on to state that there is no necessity for the third party to check that a proposed contract is within the company’s Memorandum of Association. Moreover, section 3A of the Companies Act 1985 now permits a company to have a simplified objects clause which means a company can enter into practically any contract with the third party. Only when the company’s dealing with the third partners has failed to act in good faith and the company’s directors have exceeded their aut hority, can the contract be voided according to the ultra vires rules.In the case of Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co v Riche [1875], the directors of Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co Ltd purchased a concession for making a railway in Belgium and contracted with Riche to construct the line, but the construction of a railway was not listed in the company’s Memorandum of Association, it was ultra vires. The court held that Riche's action for breach of the alleged contract failed as it was void.In our case study, MacGregor entered into a project with two of its long- standing business associates-Buildit PLC and Constructit Ltd to build a large housing estate. Nowhere, in the objects dose it state that the company has the power to enter into contracts which involve the construction of a housing estate. But Section 3A of the Companies Act 1985 now permits a company to have a simplified objects clause which means a company can enter into practically any contract with the third party. So MacGregor has no right to withdraw from the project with Constructit.3.Will the legal action by MacGregor shareholders be successful so that the company will be firced to pay out the expected bonuses?According to the Section 14 of the Companies Act 1985, when the shareholder established the company shall be in Articles of Association engage whether could get bonus. If have agreed to share out bonus, so the company's shareholders can accord to the seciton14 to lodge a complaint and request the bonus. On the other hand, if stipulated the dividends are arbitrary not forcible then the company can be resolved don't share out bonus this year.In the case of Wood v Odessa Waterworks Co [1889], the articles of a company required the company, if it declared a dividend, to pay it in cash. The company passed a resolution to pay a dividend by issuing debentures rather than paying cash.From the case, we can know the memorandum and articles are regarded as forming a contract between the company and each member.Case Study 41.List three differences between a private company and public company.The main characteristics of a private limited company are: (任选三个)1 the shares in a private limited company can not be traded or listed on the stock exchange2 there is no upper age limit for directors.3 Trading can start as soon as a Certificate of Incorporation is obtained.The main characteristics of a public limited company are: (任选三个)1 a public company must have minimum issued share capital of at least 50,0002 shares can be listed on the stock exchange and can be traded.3 directors must retire when they reach the age of 702.Can people simply decide to set up any kind of company and begin to trade immediately?According to the Companies Act 1985, the company must go to Registrar of Companies to register and send the Memorandum of Association and the Articles of Association. These two documents are illustrating the nature and movement way of the company to the Registrar of Companies. So when the company hasn't allowed, that to say has not been approved, and would not unfold transaction activity. Any new company must be get Certificate of Incorporation from Registrar of Companies then will be recognized the company has been established. The company must accord to the Companies Acts 1985 Section117 to get Certificate of Trade then conduct business transactions.3.What kind of legal status is a company said to have?When the company was allowed to register that means the company has legal personality. According this rule, company was recognized as a legal personality, also the artificial legal person, with other shareholders or members distinguish and have separate corporate personalityIn the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897], Salomon transferred his business to a limited company and he and other family members subscribed the company’s memorandum. Salomon took £20,001 shares and the other 6 members took one share each. However, the business was not successful and ended up with liabilities of£7,733. The company’s liquidator claimed that the company’s business was still Salomon’s. The House of Lord stated that a company i s a legal person independent and distinct from shareholders and managers. So we can see Salomon should still be liable for debts.From the case study we can know a company is a legal person independent and distinct from shareholders and managers.4.What management body is responsible for the day-to-day running of a company?According to the Companies Acts 1985, The Company daily management institution shall is the company's board of directors.5. What is the most common style of liability for company members?Members of the company undertake the responsibility in the company is Limited liability. Limited liability company's "limited" explained the company's members undertake the limited responsibility. If the company’s members are limited by guarantee, such as: private companies, the members should be liable to the company’s creditors for an agreed sun of debts.。