违反合作原则的例子

违反合作原则产生的特殊会话含义的具体事例合作原则共包含四大准则，其下又分为若干小则，格莱斯曾指出，反语（irony）、隐喻（metaphor）、夸张（hyperbole）和缓叙（meiosis）都会最终导致合作原则的违反现象，现根据四大准则进行举例分析。

合作原则 Cooperative Principle（一）量的准则 Maxim of Quantity(1)所说之话应包含交谈目的所需要的信息。

Make your contribution as informative as is required (for the current purpose of the exchange；(2)所说之话不应包含超出需要的信息。

Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.For example,1. Earl: I just want to look nice for my son when he comes in.Max: What I am going to meet your kidEarl: Well, one of them.Max:“One of them” How many do you haveEarl: So farMax: Oh, Earl, I love you.Earl: This is my son, Darius. He is the Chrysler salesman in all of Detroit. And he is my very favorite if he is the one I’m thinking of.(From Bankruptcy Sisters)Analyze: This is a scene of Bankruptcy Sisters, Earl only told he dressed so decently to meet his son, but didn’t say clearly if Max would meet his son together, that`s why Max felt puzzled and asked him how many of his sons; then Earl answered “So far” , until the last sentence he did tell the purpose for meeting his son and add another unnecessary message “ if he is the one I’m thinking of.” Because of the hiatus or the redundancy of their conversation, makes the audiences fall into a reverie and sets a humorous comedy atmosphere.2. Caroline: Oh my God! Is he your fatherMax: Yes, he is my father. And my mother is a piece of chalk.(From BankruptcySisters)Analyze: This is a conversation between Caroline and Max. Caroline asked if the man came into the cafe was Max’s father, Max answer “Yes” but add one more sentence “And my mother is piece of chalk.” which indicated the man was not Max ‘s father at all. Obviously, though this situation is typical message redundancy, it helps the listeners to understand the speaker’s real meaning and humor.3.柳小姐之夫：老婆，请问一下你会不会打我柳小姐：我干嘛要打你啊你又没做错事。

合作原则的违反的例子【篇一：合作原则的违反的例子】范文一：180企业家天地#下旬刊/2009/3会话中合作原则的的违反许晴摘要:二十世纪六十年代末,美国哲学家paulgrice提出了交际双方为顺利交流所必须遵循的合作原则。

但在许多情况下,由于种种原因,交际双方会通过多种方式违反合作原则。

这时,听话人必须把握说话者的真正意图。

本文分析了大量会话中违反合作原则的例子,推导出说话人的隐含意义,指出了一些原因,并指明合作原则对正确使用和理解语言意义重大。

关键词:会话;合作原则;违反中图分类号:f123.16 文献标识码:a文章编号:cn43-1027/f(2009)3-180-02作者:湖南对外经济贸易职业学院;湖南,长沙,410008 manshand.)man:ouch!hey!yousaidyourdogdoesntbite.woman:hedoesnt,bu tthatsnotmydog.在这个对话中,女人没有提供足够的信息。

她应该早点说/这只狗不是我的0。

女人故意违反量的原则,也许是因为她不愿意与这个陌生人交流。

21a:wherehaveyoubeen?b:out.在这个对话中,b了解a想要知道他的确切的去处,但他提供的信息量比a预期的要少。

也许b的言外之意就是/我去哪里跟你无关。

031tom:areyougoingtovisitbetty?jim:yes.tom:wheredoesshelive?jim:somewhereinthesouthofthecity.在这个对话中,很明显,jim知道betty的住址,但他保留了一些信息。

也许他的意图就是/我不愿意告诉你她住在哪0。

41father:howdidyoudoyourhistoryexam?tom:oh,notatallwell,th eyaskedmethingsthathap-penedbeforeiwasborn.父亲需要的回答仅仅是/考得不好0,而tom给了过量的信息。

一：违反数量准则1.A: When are you going to the airport?B: Sometime this morning.B的回答违反了数量原则，因为在他的回答中，他给A 提供的信息少于A 所希望他提供的信息。

如果B知道出发时间，A也知道B知道出发时间，B也知道A知道他知道自己的出发时间，那么B这样说就会产生会话含义，即“我不想告诉你什么时候去机场”。

2.Wife: When did you come back last night?Husband: Around midnight. The meeting was too long.妻子问丈夫回来的时间，而丈夫不但回答了回来的时间，还补充说会议开太久了，为自己午夜才回家找个合适的理由。

涨幅第二句话是过量信息，是妻子所不需要的，他这么说是为了避免妻子的责备和不必要的麻烦。

3.A: Where does Mr. Smith live?B: Somewhere in the town.B明白A想知道Smith先生的具体住址并想去拜访他,但他也知道Smith先生不愿意让A去他那里,所以只好违反数量准则给B以含糊的回答。

当然,B的回答并不排除另一种可能性,他自己也不知道Smith先生的具体住址,但他又不想违反质量准则而乱编一个地址给B,所以只好给予含糊的回答。

4.A: What do you think of Mark?B: His flat-mate is a wonderful cook.B对Mark没有好感,但又不好直说,更不想违反质量准则去说假话,所以故意违反了数量准则,没有给A以足够的信息,而A从B答非所问的回答中也可知道B 对Mark评价不高。

5.A: What are you reading?B: A book.从B违反数量准则的回答可以推知,他正在安心读书,不想别人打搅自己。

二：违反质量准则1.A: I might win the lottery.B: Yes, and pigs might fly.对话中B没有直接告诉A他不同意A的看法，而是说出猪可能会飞，这句明显违反质量准则的话，讥讽A的异想天开，让A得出结论他不可能赢得大奖。

合作使人失败的例子
1. 在企业合作中，合作伙伴之间存在不平等的力量关系时，合作伙伴可能会利用自己的优势来占据更多的利益，导致另一方的失败。

这种情况常见于大公司和小公司之间的合作。

2. 在团队合作中，某些成员可能不遵守团队规则或缺乏责任心，导致整个团队的失败。

这种情况可能发生在缺乏有效领导的情况下。

3. 在政治和国际合作中，一国可能会故意破坏另一国的合作，以获取自己的政治和经济利益。

例如，国际制裁和贸易战可能导致合作失败。

4. 在个人关系中，合作伙伴可能会互相攀比或怀有嫉妒心理，破坏合作关系，导致失败。

5. 在跨学科和跨领域的合作中，各方可能难以理解彼此的专业术语和概念，导致误解和合作失败。

违反合作原则的对话例证违反合作原则的对话例证：第一步：场景设置在一个办公室里，小明和小红是同事关系。

今天他们因为工作安排产生了分歧。

第二步：违反合作原则的对话小明：我已经决定了明天的工作安排，你需要帮我完成这个任务。

小红：我有自己的工作要处理，没有时间帮你。

小明：你怎么可以这样！我们是同事，应该互相帮助。

第三步：分析违反合作原则的原因在这个对话中，小明违反了合作原则。

他没有尊重小红的时间和权益，强迫她完成自己的任务。

第四步：合作原则的重要性合作原则是指在人际关系中互相理解、互相尊重的基础上进行合作。

它在工作场所尤为重要，因为合作能够提高团队的效率和凝聚力。

第五步：正确的合作方式在这个例子中，小明应该采取以下正确的合作方式：1.尊重他人的时间和权益：他应该理解小红也有自己的工作要完成，不能强迫她帮自己。

2.寻求共识和谅解：他可以与小红沟通，了解她是否有能力和时间帮助他，并尝试找到一个双方都能接受的解决方案。

第六步：重塑对话小明：我已经决定了明天的工作安排，你是否有时间帮助我完成这个任务？小红：很抱歉，我有一些紧急的工作需要处理，暂时没有时间帮你。

但我可以尽量安排一些时间来协助你。

小明：谢谢你的理解，我们可以商量一下，看看是否能找到一个适合我们双方的时间。

第七步：正确的合作结果通过重新表达和理解，小明和小红达成了一个双方都能接受的合作结果。

他们互相尊重，充分考虑对方的情况，达成了一种合作的平衡。

第八步：总结这个例子展示了违反合作原则的对话是如何产生分歧和冲突的。

正确认识合作原则的重要性，并采取正确的合作方式，能够帮助我们建立良好的人际关系，提高工作效率。

关于合作的反面事例合作的反面事例：不合作导致的业绩下滑一、引言合作是现代社会中不可或缺的一种工作方式，通过合作，不同个体或组织共同努力，实现共同的目标。

然而，如果合作不当或存在问题，就会出现一系列负面影响，甚至导致业绩下滑。

本文将以某公司内部合作不当的案例为例，探讨合作的反面事例。

二、案例描述某公司是一家中型制造企业，拥有多个部门，包括生产、销售、研发等。

在过去的一段时间里，该公司的业绩一直保持稳定增长。

然而，最近一段时间，该公司的业绩出现了明显下滑的趋势。

经过调查和分析，发现问题的根源在于各部门之间的合作出现了一系列问题。

三、合作问题的具体表现1. 缺乏沟通和协调：各部门之间缺乏有效的沟通和协调机制，导致信息不畅通，工作重复或遗漏。

例如，生产部门和销售部门没有及时共享市场需求信息，导致生产计划与市场需求不匹配，产品积压或缺货。

2. 利益冲突和争执：由于各部门追求自身利益，导致合作时出现争执和冲突。

例如，研发部门开发出的新产品在生产上遇到了问题，但生产部门因为时间和成本压力，不愿意配合解决问题，最终导致产品质量下降，影响了销售业绩。

3. 缺乏团队意识和协作精神：各部门在合作中缺乏团队意识和协作精神，只注重自身利益而忽视整体利益。

例如，销售部门为了完成自己的销售目标，采取了过度承诺的销售手段，导致生产部门无法按时交付，最终影响了客户满意度和企业形象。

四、合作问题的影响1. 业绩下滑：由于合作问题导致工作效率低下，产品质量下降，客户满意度下降等，最终导致业绩下滑。

2. 内外部关系紧张：由于合作问题导致内部各部门之间关系紧张，外部客户和合作伙伴也会对企业的合作能力和信誉产生质疑，进一步影响企业的发展。

3. 员工士气低下：长期存在合作问题会导致员工士气低下，工作积极性下降，员工流失等问题。

五、解决合作问题的建议1. 加强沟通和协调：建立跨部门沟通和协调机制，确保信息畅通，工作协同。

2. 强调团队合作和协作精神：通过团队建设和培训，加强员工的团队合作意识和协作能力。

话语中格莱斯合作原则的违背现象分析格莱斯合作原则是指在沟通、交流和合作中遵守一定的准则，保持良好的合作关系和互信。

在现实生活中，我们常常会遇到一些违背格莱斯合作原则的现象，这些现象不仅影响了人际关系和团队合作，还给整个社会带来了各种问题。

本文将从具体案例出发，分析话语中格莱斯合作原则的违背现象，并探讨其影响和解决办法。

1. 不尊重他人意见在许多合作场合，我们常常会碰到一些人并不尊重他人的意见，他们总是以自己的想法为中心，对他人的意见置之不理。

在一个工作会议上，有人提出了一个建议，而另一位同事却对此不屑一顾，直接否决了这个建议。

这种情况下，明显违反了格莱斯合作原则中的尊重他人的态度。

这种违背格莱斯合作原则的现象给团队合作带来了很大的困难。

如果大家都不愿意尊重他人的意见，那么很难达成共识，导致团队合作效率低下，甚至影响到整个项目的进展。

而且这种行为也会严重损害团队成员之间的关系，造成团队分裂和不和谐。

解决这个问题的方法是，首先需要大家意识到尊重他人意见对团队的重要性，而且每个人都应该有平等的发言权。

在合作中，应该多一些包容和接纳，尊重并听取他人的意见，相信每个人都能为团队带来新的思路和想法。

2. 打断他人发言在交流和合作中，有些人习惯性地打断他人的发言，表现出一种目中无人的态度。

在一个讨论会上，一位同事正在提出自己的观点，但另一位同事直接打断了他的发言，表达了自己的看法。

这种行为不仅是对他人的不尊重，也是对合作沟通的破坏。

打断他人发言的现象会导致沟通和合作的混乱。

在一个讨论会上，如果每个人都不顾及他人的发言权，那么很难形成有序的讨论和交流，导致会议进程混乱，无法达成共识。

而且这种行为也会给人留下不礼貌和没礼貌的印象，影响个人和团队的形象。

解决这个问题的方法是，每个人都应该养成礼貌的沟通习惯，尊重他人的发言权。

在一个讨论会上，应该给予每个人充分的表达机会，不轻易打断他人的发言。

如果真的有不同意见，可以等对方说完再提出自己的看法，保持良好的交流和合作关系。

商务英语合同中违反合作原则的案例In business English contracts, it is essential to adhere to the principles of cooperation. However, there are instances where these principles are violated, leading to disputes and conflicts. In this article, we will explore some examples of violations of cooperation principles in business English contracts.One common violation of cooperation principles is the failure to provide timely and accurate information. In a business contract, it is crucial for both parties to exchange relevant information promptly and accurately. However, if one party deliberately withholds information or provides misleading information, it can disrupt the cooperation and lead to misunderstandings. For example, in a manufacturing agreement, if the supplier fails to inform the buyer about a change in the production process, it can result in defective products and financial losses for the buyer.Another violation of cooperation principles is the failure to fulfill contractual obligations. When entering into a business contract, both parties have certain responsibilities and obligations to fulfill. However, if one party fails to meet these obligations, it can disrupt the cooperation and damage the business relationship. For instance, in a distribution agreement, if the distributor fails to deliver the products to the agreed locations within the specified time frame, it can lead to customer dissatisfaction and loss of sales for the manufacturer.Furthermore, the lack of communication and collaboration can also be a violation of cooperation principles. Effective communication is vital for successful cooperation in business contracts. If one party refuses to engage in open and transparent communication or disregards the opinions and suggestions of the other party, it can hinder the progress of the project and create a hostile working environment. For example, in a joint venture agreement, if one partner consistently ignores the input of the other partner and makes decisions unilaterally, it can lead to conflicts and the eventual dissolution of the partnership.Additionally, the failure to resolve disputes amicably is another violation of cooperation principles. In business contracts, disagreements and disputes can arise, but it is crucial to handle them in a fair and respectful manner. If one party resorts to aggressive tactics, such as threats or legal action, instead of seeking mediation or negotiation, it can escalate the conflict and damage the cooperation. For instance, in a licensing agreement, if the licensor immediately initiates a lawsuit against the licensee without attempting to resolve the issue through negotiation, it can strain the relationship and result in financial losses for both parties.In conclusion, violations of cooperation principles in business English contracts can have significant consequences. Failure to provide timely and accurate information, fulfill contractual obligations, communicate effectively, and resolve disputes amicably can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and financial losses. It is essential for all parties involved to adhere to these principles and work towards maintaining a cooperative and productive business relationship.。

话语中格莱斯合作原则的违背现象分析话语中的格莱斯合作原则是指在沟通过程中，交流双方需要遵循相互信任、尊重、合作和互利的原则。

当交流双方违背这个原则时，就会出现沟通障碍和误解。

下面将从言语行为中常见的几点违背格莱斯合作原则的情况进行分析。

一、言语不清言语不清往往在口语交流中最为常见，包括发音、语调、语速、语气等方面。

当语言表述不够清晰明了时，容易引起对方的猜测和误解，进而导致沟通失败。

例如，某个人在询问另一个人的情况时，语气模糊，语速过快，或者发音不清，另一方难以听懂，沟通也就难以进行。

二、信息不全信息不全指的是信息的缺失或信息的不足。

在沟通中，信息的完整性对于沟通的有效性至关重要，一旦信息缺失或者不足，就会导致双方的误解和沟通的失败。

例如，某个人在讲述故事时，漏掉了重要的细节或者关键的信息，另一个人难以理解故事的意思，从而产生误解，难以有效地完成沟通。

三、说话含糊说话含糊是指表达意思不是很明确，或者意图不够明显的语言表述。

这种情况会导致对方难以理解讲话人的意图和目的，从而产生误解。

例如，某个人在讲述计划时，语气含糊，表达不清，对方难以理解讲话人的意图和目的，导致沟通失败。

四、说谎在交流中，如果交流双方有人故意说谎或者隐瞒真相，就会导致对方的不信任和怀疑，从而使沟通的效果受到影响。

即便是为了达到某些目的而说谎，也应该遵守基本的道德等原则，避免对方的误解和对自身的损害。

例如，在商业谈判中，如果交流双方一方故意隐瞒或者夸大自己的实力和优势，另一方难以信任，从而阻碍谈判的顺利进行。

违反合作原则的例子一、违反“量的准则”1.《老友记》Joey: You need anything. You can always come to Joey. I and Chandler live right across the hall and he is away a lot.Monica: Joey, stopping hitting on her. It’s her wedding day.Joey: What. Like there is a rule or something.Background: Rachel runs away from her wedding and finds Monica for a shelterAnalysis: The words of Joey violate the maxim of quantity. He gives more information than is required. The aim Joey says Chandler is away a lot is to imply Rachel she can find him at any time and nobody will disturb them.2.《老友记》Joey: I think we got a bookcase here.Chandler: It’s a beautiful thing.Joey: What’s that?Chandler: I would have to say that is an L-shaped bracket.Joey: Which goes where?Chandler: I have no idea.Background: Joey and Chandler help Ross to assemble the new bookshelf. After they finish the work, Joey finds a part redundant.Analysis: The answer of Chandler violates the maxim of quantity. He does not give a definite answer of Joey’s question. The less of information shows Chandler also has no idea of the redundant part.3.《破产姐妹》Cat Owner: Hi. Excuse me. Would it be okay if I put this flier next to your window?Caroline: Sure.Cat Owner: We lost our cat, Jinxy, like a week ago in this neighborhood. (She shows the picture) Have you seen her?Caroline: No. I haven’t seen a cay in a long time. I was just saying to her yesterday, “I haven’t seen a cat in a long time.”Max: Um, how come you didn’t have a collar on her? And, where’s her name tag? Even my mother had an I.D. tag on me. Well, it was a flea collar, but… Why did it so long to put the signs up?Cat Owner: Um, what’s happening?Background: Max and Caroline take a pet cat for a wild cat and set it free. However, the cat owner comes to their shop to find the cat.Analysis: The answer of Max and Caroline violates the maxim of quantity. They give quite more information to cover up their guilty conscience.4.《破产姐妹》Max: Earl, I have something new I want you to try.Earl: That’s the exact same sentence that got me hooked on cocaine in the 80s. Max: It’s my new cupcake flavor. Delicious dark chocolate the ladies can’t help but love. I am calling it “The Earl”.Analysis: The words of Max violate the maxim of quantity. She only tells Earl to try something new which does not give Earl enough information about what it is. Thus Earl ridicules himself about the reason of hooking on cocaine. Then Max names the dark chocolate cake after Earl which imply Earl’s skin color and his good popularity.5.《生活大爆炸》Lenard: What are you talking about?Sheldon: Einstein.Lenard: Yeah, I am going to need a little more.Sheldon: Albert Einstein.Background: Sheldon is researching the problem of grapheme. And he decides to do a large number of experiments. He tells Lenard about his idea of solving this problem.Analysis: The answer of Sheldon violates the maxim of quantity. Lenard hopes Sheldon to tell more information about his idea such as the theory of Einstein. However, two of Sheldon’s answers are both the name of Einstein. He gives quite little information and misunderstands the meaning of Lenard’s question which makes the dialogue quite humorous.二、违反“质的准则”1.《老友记》Monica: Ross, are you ok? Do you want me to stay?Ross: That’ll be good.Monica: Really?Ross: No! Go on! It’s Paul, the wine guy!Background:Monica has a data with Paul, but she really worries her brother Ross who was divorced lately. So she asks Paul whether he needs her company. Analysis:The words of Ross violate the maxim of quality. Actually, he hopes Monica to have a data with Paul. However, in order to play a joke with his sister, he says it will be good if Monica stay to accompany him.2.《老友记》Monica: How did you get through it?Paul: He may try accidently break something valuable of hers. Say her …Monica: Leg?Paul: That’s one way of doing it. Me, I went for thewatch.Analysis:The words of Monica violate the maxim of quality. Actually she knows it is impossible for Paul to break her leg. Her use of exaggeration makesthe dialogue more humorous.3.《老友记》Chandler: What is it? Dis she left you? Did she left for another woman that likes women?Ross: A little louder, Please. Because, I think there is a man on the 12th floor in coma who didn’t quite hear you.Background:Ross is hurt so he goes to the hospital with the company of Chandler and Joey. In the corridor, Chandler talks about Ross’s ex-wife loudly. Analysis: The words of Ross violate the maxim of quality. “A litter louder” is an irony. And the man in 12th is also fictitious. The aim of Ross is to complain about Joey’s behavior.4.《老友记》Rachel: Guess what?Ross: You got a job?Rachel: Are you kidding? I’m trained for nothing.Rachel: I was laughed out of 12 interviews today.Chandler: Yet you are surprisingly upbeat.Rachel: You would be too, if you found John and David boots on sale, 50% off. Chandler: How well you know me?Analysis: The words of Chandler violate the maxim of quality. Actually he has no interest in John and David boots. But, he does not want Rachel feels disappointed. So he uses an irony.5.《破产姐妹》Max: I want to go back there and see for myself.Receptionist: Family members only.Max: Well, I’m his daughter.Receptionist: Oh, really? It says here he’s 75 years old.Max: Well, he started late.Receptionist: And African American.Max: He started late with a honkey. I’m one of those combo babies. Here, you need proof? My last name is Black. See, Max Black. He is black. I am Black. It’d be dumb if we were n’t related.Background: Earl suffers a sudden heart attack and is set to the hospital. In order to know Earl’s health condition, Max wants to visit Earl.Analysis: All the words of Max violate the maxim of quality. The reason Max tells the lies is that she wants to prove herself is the daughter of Earl so that she can get the qualification to visit Earl.三、违反“关系准则”1.《老友记》Rachel: Come on, you guys. Is this really necessary? I can stop charging any time.Monica: You can’t live off your parents your whole life.Rachel: I know that. That’s why l was getting married.Analysis:The answer of Rachel violates the maxim of relation. The aim of Monica is to persuade Rachel to be dependent from her parents and find a job. However, Rachel only wants to get married and depend on her husband. The thought is entirely against the intention of Monica. Rachel’s answer actually has no relation with Monica’s words.2.《老友记》Joey: Ross, let me ask you one question. She got the future, the stereo, the good TV, what did you get?Ross: You guys.Analysis:The answer of Ross violates the maxim of relation. Joey asks Ross what householdgoods he has got when he divorced. However, Ross gives an irrelevant answer which shows us that he does not want to answer this question.3.《破产姐妹》Oleg：I have Valentine gift I want to give you.Sophie: Oh, hepatitis C?Oleg: Happy Valentine’s Day. (He lacks out a box of chocolates from his coat) Analysis: The words of Sophie violate the maxim of relation. Hepatitis C infects through blood and sex. So Sophie’s words imply that she has no interest in Oleg. And she does not want to accept Oleg’s gift or have a Valentine’s Day with him.4.《破产姐妹》Max: Hey, I am sleeping at Dick’s house tonight.Caroline: Dick’s house? You mean your boyfriend’s dumpster?Max: Yeah, so I need a, uh…Caroline: Tetanus shot? Higher standards?Max: No, a condom.Analysis:The words of Caroline violate the maxim of relation. Max will have a sleep at her boyfriend’s house. So she wants to ask Caroline for some contraceptive. However, Caroline forestalls Max’s words and asks Max whether she wants Tetanus shot which imply how dirty Dick’s house is. It is a show of humorous.5.《生活大爆炸》Penny: Sheldon, I am sorry about your ham burger okay? I just don’t want to be a waitress for the rest of my life.Sheldon: Cheese burger. I get cheese burger.Analysis: The words of Sheldon violate the maxim of relation. Penny only wants to emphasize that she does not want to be a waitress forever. So she tells Sheldon that she may be has no chance to sever him ham burger. However, Sheldon does not understand Penny’s key point. He only cares about the mistake between ham burger and cheese burger. His answer entirely has no relation with what Penny really want to express.四、违反“方式准则”1.《老友记》Rachel: Hello, Paul!Joey: Good morning, Paul!Chandler: Paul, is it?Background: It is the second time for these three people to meet Paul. Monica has already introduced Paul to them last time.Analysis:The reaction of Chandler violates the maxim of manner. He uses a rhetorical question instead of the brief words to greet Paul. It is impossible for Chandler to remember such a simple name: Paul. He is deliberate. So we can infer that Chandler does not appreciate Paul. He opposes Monica to fall in love with Paul.2.《老友记》Rachel: Isn’t this amazing? I’ve never made coffee before in my life. Chandler: That is amazing.Joey: Congratulations.Rachel: You know. I figure, if I can make coffee, there isn’t anything I can’t do. Chandler: I think it is if I can invade Poland, there isn’t anything I can’t do. Joey: Listen, while you are on a roll, if you feel like you got make like a Western omelet or something…(Joey and Chandler taste the coffee, grimace and pour it into a plant pot) Although actually I am really not that hungry…Background: It is the first time for Rachel to make coffee. Joey and Chandler are both happy with her progress.Analysis:The reaction of Joey violates the maxim of manner. The sentence “Actually I am really not that hungry”hints that the coffee made by Rachel is not delicious.3.《破产姐妹》Max: Welcome to the Williamsburg Dinner. My name’s Max.The customer: Uh, I have been out of town all summer, anything new?Max: Anything new? Let’s see. Well, Facebook went public, and Edward Snowden went private. Kim and Kanye had a baby, so now there’s anotherKardashian to not keep up with. Paula Deen id out, gay marriage is in, and a teacher in California is out for letting her student get in it. Justin Bieber got a hit and run, Chris Brown got a hit and run, Rihana got a hit and still did n’t run…Egypt went crazy, Amanda Bynes get crazier, and the NSA cheeks our phones like a crazy ex-girlfriend. Oh, and Texas hates women, Florida hates blacks, and everybody hates everything with the exception of Angelina Jolie, who is totally awesome.Analysis:The sentence “anything new”violates the maxim of manner. It is ambiguity. According to the customer, “anything new”means “Do you have some new dishes introduced?” However, “anything new” can also be understood as “Are there any fresh news?” Max deliberately misunderstands the customer’s meaning to show her humor.4.《生活大爆炸》Leonard: What do you mean he is getting deported?Sheldon: I believe it means that the U.S. government is going to expel him from the country. He could then either return to his native India, immigrate to another country that’s willing to accept him, or wander the high seas as a stateless pirate. Personally, I choose pirate.Analysis: The answer of Sheldon violates the maxim of manner. The purpose of Leonard is only to care about their friend Raj who is extremely worried to be expelled from the USA because of the failure of the experiment. Sheldon wants to show his intelligence, so he answers Leonard quite a lot of nonsense. His words are actually wordy.5.《生活大爆炸》Sheldon: What the hell do you mean “dead end”?Dennis: I mean, the whole landscape of false vacuums in string theory could be as large as ten to the five hundredth power. In addition, ooh, look, chocolate milk!Analysis:Dennis’s reaction of chocolate milk violates the maxim of manner. Dennis is a 15-year-old brilliant scientist. When he points out the problem of the string theory, he is attracted by the chocolate milk. So he does not have interest to continue the topic of string theory. His words are suddenly out of coherent that make other people at a loss.。