消化内科pdca案例ppt
- 格式:pptx
- 大小:18.64 MB
- 文档页数:66
消化内科2014年6月—2015年5月《交班记录本》情况PDCA《交班记录本》是临床科室统计患者出入院人数及对患者病情进行连续观察,并作为今后工作记录,随访患者出院后情况的重要临床依据,也是临床十六项核心制度之一,故每一个医师都应当认真书写交班记录。
一、计划(Plan)按照《交接班制度》的规定,对本科室2014年6月—2015年5月交班的实际书写情况进行分析总结,以便进一步提高交班本的记录质量。
二、实施(do)对科室2014年6月-2015年5月《交班本》进行逐页检查,对照《交接班制度》的规定,结合《危急值管理系统》、《电子病历系统》及现场检查,发现存在的问题。
并对问题的出现频率予以统计,找出原因,便于改进。
三、检查总结情况的反馈(Check)(见图1)1、《交班本》填写缺项占到所有缺陷中的首位。
连续抽查100天,占60%。
缺项内容主要是交班时间、接班医师未签名、新病人及病危病人未标注。
2、《交班本》记录中涂改情况严重,且字迹潦草,难以辨认,连续抽查100页,发现占50%。
3、值班医师,特别是夜班医师,在病人出现病情变化并做了重要处理时,交班本中记录内容不到位,此种情况占30%。
4、《危急值》在处理后,交班本中予以记录的制度执行不到位,连续对一月中10个危急值处理情况进行交班本中的跟踪,发现有3个未记录,占30%。
体现了危重患者,交接班环节中存在重大漏洞。
5、《医师交班本》的病例人数与《护士交班本》中的病例人数有不同,体现医护间工作沟通及病人入出院的标准,未得到统一,此种情况占20%。
6、危重病人,经当班医师抢救治疗后,不仅在第二天的晨会交班本中予以交班,值班医师还应与经管医师进行患者床头交班,观察30天,出现3次病重患者未在患者床头交接班,约占10%。
7、《交班本》因每日需经多人书写及查阅,如保管、爱惜不够极易出现破损,严重出现缺页,观察发现破损率在5%。
8、存在随意换班现象,《医师交班本》中填写的交接班医师与科室排班表安排的值班医师不一致,连续抽查100天,约占5%。
消化内科2014年6月—2015年5月《交班记录本》情况PDCA《交班记录本》是临床科室统计患者出入院人数及对患者病情进行连续观察,并作为今后工作记录,随访患者出院后情况的重要临床依据,也是临床十六项核心制度之一,故每一个医师都应当认真书写交班记录。
一、计划(Plan)按照《交接班制度》的规定,对本科室2014年6月—2015年5月交班的实际书写情况进行分析总结,以便进一步提高交班本的记录质量。
二、实施(do)对科室2014年6月-2015年5月《交班本》进行逐页检查,对照《交接班制度》的规定,结合《危急值管理系统》、《电子病历系统》及现场检查,发现存在的问题。
并对问题的出现频率予以统计,找出原因,便于改进。
三、检查总结情况的反馈(Check)(见图1)1、《交班本》填写缺项占到所有缺陷中的首位。
连续抽查100天,占60%。
缺项内容主要是交班时间、接班医师未签名、新病人及病危病人未标注。
2、《交班本》记录中涂改情况严重,且字迹潦草,难以辨认,连续抽查100页,发现占50%。
3、值班医师,特别是夜班医师,在病人出现病情变化并做了重要处理时,交班本中记录内容不到位,此种情况占30%。
4、《危急值》在处理后,交班本中予以记录的制度执行不到位,连续对一月中10个危急值处理情况进行交班本中的跟踪,发现有3个未记录,占30%。
体现了危重患者,交接班环节中存在重大漏洞。
5、《医师交班本》的病例人数与《护士交班本》中的病例人数有不同,体现医护间工作沟通及病人入出院的标准,未得到统一,此种情况占20%。
6、危重病人,经当班医师抢救治疗后,不仅在第二天的晨会交班本中予以交班,值班医师还应与经管医师进行患者床头交班,观察30天,出现3次病重患者未在患者床头交接班,约占10%。
7、《交班本》因每日需经多人书写及查阅,如保管、爱惜不够极易出现破损,严重出现缺页,观察发现破损率在5%。
8、存在随意换班现象,《医师交班本》中填写的交接班医师与科室排班表安排的值班医师不一致,连续抽查100天,约占5%。
消化内科持续改进pdca案例英文版Digestive Internal Medicine: A Case Study of Continuous Improvement using the PDCA CycleIn the field of healthcare, continuous improvement is crucial for ensuring patient safety and quality outcomes. This is particularly true in the realm of Digestive Internal Medicine, where the complexity of patient conditions and the range of treatment options require a meticulous and iterative approach to care delivery. The Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, a widely used framework for continuous improvement, can be effectively applied to Digestive Internal Medicine to drive positive changes and enhance patient care.Plan:The first step in the PDCA cycle is to identify a problem or opportunity for improvement. In the Digestive Internal Medicine department of a large hospital, it was noted that there was ahigher than expected readmission rate for patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). The team hypothesized that this could be due to a lack of standardized discharge instructions and follow-up plans.Based on this, the team formulated a plan to create a standardized discharge protocol for GERD patients, including clear instructions on lifestyle modifications, medication adherence, and follow-up appointments. They also planned to train the staff on this new protocol to ensure its effective implementation.Do:The team implemented the plan by rolling out the new discharge protocol for GERD patients. They conducted training sessions for the staff, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the protocol and its impact on patient outcomes. Additionally, they ensured that the protocol was easily accessible to all staff members.Check:After implementing the new protocol, the team monitored the readmission rate for GERD patients. They found that while there was a slight improvement, the results were not as significant as expected. Upon further analysis, they realized that some staff members were not fully adhering to the protocol, and there was a lack of consistent follow-up with patients.Act:In response to these findings, the team took corrective actions. They reinforced the training on the discharge protocol and conducted regular audits to ensure compliance. They also introduced a reminder system to ensure consistent follow-up with patients. Additionally, they encouraged staff members to provide feedback on the protocol, which helped identify further areas for improvement.Conclusion:By applying the PDCA cycle, the Digestive Internal Medicine department was able to identify and address issues related to patient readmissions for GERD. While the initial implementationdid not yield significant results, the team's responsive actions and continuous improvement mindset allowed them to refine the process and achieve better outcomes. This case study demonstrates the effectiveness of the PDCA cycle in driving positive changes in healthcare delivery and enhancing patient care.中文版消化内科:使用PDCA循环持续改进的案例研究在医疗领域,持续改进对于确保患者安全和提高治疗效果至关重要。