《新编语言学教程》课后答案

  • 格式:doc
  • 大小:67.00 KB
  • 文档页数:10

(1) semantics: the study of linguistic meaning.(2) truth-conditional semantics: an approach that knowing the meaning of the sentenceis the same as knowing the conditions under which the sentence is true or false, andknowing the meaning of a word or expression is knowing the part that it plays in thetruth or falsehood of the sentence containing it.(3) naming theory: the view that the meaning of an expression is what it refers to, or names.(4) behaviorist theory: the view that the mean ing of a linguistic form is defined as observablebehaviors which is an approach drawing on psychology.(5) use theory: the semantic theory according to which the meaning of anexpression is determined by its use in communication and more generally, insocial interaction.(6) sense: the inherent part of an expression’s meaning, together with the context,determines its referent. For example, knowing the sense of a noun phrasesuch as the president of the United States in 2004 allows one to determine that Georgesuch as the president of the United States in 2004 allows one to determine that George (7) reference: (in semantics) the relationship between words and the things,actions, events and qualities they stand for. An example in English is the relationshipbetween the word tree and the object “tree” (referent) in the real world.(8) conceptual meaning: It means the meaning of words may be discussed in terms ofwhat they denote or refer to, also called denotative or cognitive meaning. It is theessential and inextricable part of what language is and is widely regarded as thecentral factor in verbal communication. For instance, the conceptual meaning of “he” in English is any male person or male animal.(9) connotative meaning: It is the communicative meaning that a word or acombination of words has by virtue of what it refers to, over its purely conceptualmeaning. For example, the connotative meaning of “woman” is emotional, frail,inconstant, irrational, etc.(10) semantic field: the organization of related words and expressions into asystemwhich shows their relationship to one another. For example, kinship terms such as father, mother, brother, sister, uncle, aunt belong to a s emantic field whose relevant featuresinclude generation, sex, membership of the father’s or mother’s side of family.(11) lexical gap: the absence of a word in a particular place in a semantic field of a language.For instance, in English we have brother versus sister, son versus daughter, but noseparate lexemes for “male” and “female” cousin.(12) componential analysis: (in semantics) an approach to the study of meaning which analyzesa word into a set of meaning components or semantic features. For example,the meaning of the English word boy may be shown as [+human][+male][-adult]. (13) semantic feature: the smallest units of meaning in a word. The meaning of wordmay be described as a combination of semantic components or features. Forexample, the feature [+male] is part of the meaning of father, and so is thefeature [+adult], but other features are needed to make up the whole meaning of father.Often, semantic features are established by contrast and can be stated in terms of [+] and[-], e.g. woman has the semantic features [+human], [-male] and [+adult].(14) synonym: the sense relations of equivalence of meaning between lexical items,e.g. small/little and dead/deceased.(15) antonym: the sense relation of various kinds of opposing meaning between lexical items,e.g. big/small, alive/dead and good/bad.(16) hyponymy: the sense relation between terms in a hierarchy, where a moreparticular term (the hyponym) is included in the more general one (the superordinate): Xis a Y, e.g. a beech is a tree, a tree is a plant.(17) meronym: the sense relation between body and its parts which are not only sections ofthe body but defined in terms of specific functions. For example, the head is the part ofthe body which carries the most important sense organs, i.e. eyes, ears, nose and tongue.(18) semantic role: the way in which the referent of a noun phrase is involved in the situationdescribed or represented by the clause, for example as agent, patient, orcause.(19) entailment: the relationship between two sentences where the truth of one (thesecond) is inferred from the truth of the other, e.g. Corday assassinated Marat and Maratis dead; if the first is true, the second must be true.(20) presupposition: implicit assumptions about the world required to make an utterancemeaningful or appropriate, e.g. “some tea has already been taken” is a presupposition of“Take some more tea!”2. (1) He waited by the bank.a. He waited by the finan cial institution which people can keep their money in or borrowfrom.b. He waited by the bank of the river.(2) Is he really that kind?a. Is he really that type of person?b. Is he really that kind-hearted?(3) We bought her dog biscuits.a. We bought dog biscuits for her.b. We bought biscuits for her dog.(4) He saw that gasoline can explode.a. He saw that gasoline container explode.b. He saw that gasoline may explode.(5) Fifty soldiers shot three wild foxes.a. Fifty soldiers shot three wild foxes in total.b. Each of the fifty soldiers shot three wild foxes.(6) He saw her drawing pencils.a. He saw her pencils for drawing.b. He saw her drawing the picture of pencils.3. (2) (4) (5) (8) are antonyms; (1) (3) (6) (7) are synonyms.4. charity: kindness, sympathy, church, helpfuliron: strong, brave, hard, determinedmole: traitor, betrayal, spysnow: pure, virgin, cleanstreet: homeless, living hard, pitiable5. (1) a. hoard b. scribble c. barn, method d. olfactory(2) a. acquire b. tell c. way d. smell(3) a. buy, win, steal. b. talk, tell c. road, way, path d. smellThese words are less marked in their sets because they are more usual and tend to be used more frequently. They consist of only one morpheme and are easier to learnand remember than others. They are also often broader in meaning and cannot bedescribed by using the name of another member ofthe same field.6. homophones: sea-see, break-brake; polysemies: sea, break, prayer, mature, trace,househomonyms: ear.7. In a semantic field, not all lexical items necessarily have the same status. The less markedmembers of the same semantic field (1) are usually easier to learn andremember than more marked members; (2) consist of only one morpheme incontrast to more marked members; (3) cannot be described by using the name of anothermember of the same field; (4) tend to be used more frequently than more marked terms;(5) broader in meaning than more marked members; (6) are not the result of themetaphorical usage of the name of another object or concept, but more marked are.8. (1) a. bachelor, man, son, paperboy, pope, chiefb. bull, rooster, drake, ram.The (a) and (b) words are male.The (a) words are human.The (b) words are animals.(2) a. ask, tell, say, talk, converseb. shout, whisper, mutter, drawl, hollerThe (a) and (b) words are realized by sounds.The (a) words are normal voice quality.The (b) words are produced by modifying one’s normal voice quality.(3) a. walk, run, skip, jump, hop, swimb. fly, skate, ski, ride, cycle, canoe, hang-glideThe (a) and (b) words are sports (movement).The (a) words are sports without instruments.The (b) words are sports with instruments.(1) pragmatics: a branch of linguistics that studies language in use.(2) deixis: the marking of the orientation or position of entities and situations with respectto certain points of reference such as the place (here/there) and time (now/then) ofutterance.(3) reference: (in semantics) the relationship between words and the things, actions, events,and qualities they stand for.(4) anaphora: a process where a word or phrase (anaphor) refers back to another word orphrase which was used earlier in a text or conversation.(5) presupposition: implicit assumptions about the world required to make anutterance meaningful or appropriate, e.g. “some tea has already been taken” is apresupposition of “Take some more tea!”(6) Speech Act Theory: The theory was proposed by J. L. Austin and has been developedby J. R. Searle. Basically, they believe that language is not only used to inform or todescribe things, it is often used to “do things”, to perform acts. In saying“Sorry”, you are performing an act of apology.(7) indirect speech act: an utterance whose literal meaning (location) andintended meaning (illocution) are different. For example, Can you pass the salt?is literally a yes/no question but is usually uttered as a request or polite directive foraction.(8) the Cooperative Principle: a principle proposed by the philosopher Paul Gricewhereby those involved in communication assume that both parties willnormally seek to cooperate with each other to establish agreed meaning. It is composed of4 maxims: quality, quantity, relation and manner.(9) the Politeness Principle: politeness is regarded by most interlocutors as a meansor strategy which is used by a speaker to achieve various purposes, such assaving face, establishing and maintaining harmonious social relations in conversation.This principle requires speakers to “minimize the expression of impolite beliefs”. It iscomposed of 6 maxims: Maxims of Tact, Generosity, Approbation, Modesty, Agreementand Sympathy.(10) conversational implicature: the use of conversational maxims in the CooperativePrinciple to produce extra meaning during conversation.2. Deictic expressions: I, now, you, that, here, tomorrow.3. Anaphoric expressions: she, him, it.4. (1) He bought the beer.(2) You have a watch.(3) We bought a car.5. Direct acts: (1)/(5); Indirect acts: (2)/(3)/(4)6. (a) The Maxim of Quality: (1) Do not say what you believe to be false; (2) Do not say thatfor which you lack adequate evidence.(b) The Maxim of Quantity: (1) Make your contribution as informative as is required (for thecurrent purpose of the exchange); (2) Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.(c) The Maxim of Relation: Be relevant.(d) The Maxim of Manner: Be perspicuous (1) Avoid obscurity of expression; (2) Avoidambiguity; (3) Be brief (avoid unnecessary prolixity); (4) Be orderly.7. The speaker is particularly careful about the maxim of Agreement in PP. Theresponse begins with “well” rather than “no” in order to minimize disagreement between the speaker and hearer.8. It is an indirect speech act. Carol invites Lara to a party, but Lara wants to decline theinvitation. To be po lite, she doesn’t choose a direct refusal, instead she says “I’ve got an exam tomorrow” as a reasonable excuse to decline the invitation. In this way, she minimizes the expression of impolite beliefs, thus the utterance conforms to PP(1) discourse: a general term for examples of language use, i.e. languagepro-duced as the result of an act of communication. It refers to the larger units of language such as paragraphs, conversations and interviews.(2) discourse analysis: the study of how sentences in written and spokenlanguage form larger meaning units such as paragraphs, conversations and interviews.(3) given information: the information that the addresser believes is known tothe addressee.(4) new information: the information that the addresser believes is not known to theaddressee.(5) topic: the main center of attention in a sentence.(6) cohesion: the grammatical and/or lexical relationships between the different elements ofa text. This may be the relationship between different sentences or different parts of asentence.(7) coherence: the relationship that links the meanings of utterances in adiscourse or of the sentences in a text.(8) discourse marker: the technical term for all the items that are used to helpconstruct discourse, such as signifying the beginning or ending of a paragraph ora turn in conversation. They are commonly used in the initial position of an utterance andare syntactically de tachable from a sentence, such as well, I mean, now, then, first, second, finally.(9) adjacency pair: a set of two consecutive, ordered turns that “go together” in a adjacencypair: a set of two consecutive, ordered turns that “go together” in a acceptance,criticism/denial.(10) preference structure: in the conversations there can be several second partsrelated to one first part, but they are not of equal status. The structural likelihood is called preference, and this likely structure is the preference structure that divides second partsinto preferred and dispreferred. The former is the structurally expected and thelatter unexpected. In answering the question “Have you got a light?”, the reply “Here you are” is preferred and “Sorry, no, I don’t smoke” is dispreferred.(11 presequence: the opening sequences that are used to set up some special potential actions,such as greetings before formal conversations. “What are you doing tonight?” can be used as a presequence if it is follo wed by “If nothing special, come over and have dinner with us please.”(12) critical discourse analysis: the analysis of language use directed at, and committed to,discovering the concealed ideological bias, injustice, inequality in the powerrelations among speakers and hearers.2. In the study of discourse, cohesion refers to the grammatical and/or lexical relationshipsbetween the different parts of a text. This may be the relationship between differentsentences or different parts of a sentence. It concerns the question of how sentences areexplicitly linked together in a discourse by different kinds of overt devices. Such cohesive devices include reference, substitution, ellipses, conjunction and lexical cohesion.5. It is not a coherent discourse. Although it has connection words such as a Ford a car and black –– Black, which look like cohesive devices, they refer to entirely different things. There is a total lack of internal relation among the sentences. A text can’t be only based on superficial connections between the words to pursue coherence; there must be some relationship that links the meanings of the sentences in a text, too. This text is not in line with our real experience of the way the world is. Thus, we can’t mak e sense of it directly unless we are laborious to create meaningful connections which are not actually expressed by the words and sentences. So it’s not a coherent discourse.6. Coherence is the relationship that links the meanings of utterances in a discourse or of thesentences in a text. This extract is coherent. All the sentences (questions in fact) areorganized around the topic “interview”, and they are arranged from the general to the more specific in a logical order so that the text is easy to follow.(1) sociolinguistics: the study of the relationship between language and society, that is,how social factors influence the structure and use of language.(2) standard language: the variety of a language which has the highest status in a communityor nation and which is usually based on the speech and writing of educated native speakers of the language.(3) dialect: a language variety characteristic of a particular social group; dialectscan becharacteristic of regional, social, temporal, occupational or gender groups.(4) register: a language variety associated with a particular situation of use, e.g. baby talkand legal language.(5) pidgin: a variety of language that is not a native language of anyone, but islearned in contact situations.(6) creole: a language that begins as a pidgin and eventually becomes the firstlanguage of a speech community through its being learned by children.(7) language planning: planning, usually by a government or government agency,concerning choice of national or official language(s), ways of spreading the use of a language, spelling reforms, the addition of new words to the language, and other language problems.(8) diglossia: a situation when two distinct varieties of the same language areused, side by side, for two different sets of functions.(9) bilingualism: the use of at least two languages either by an individual or by a group ofspeakers, such as the inhabitants of a particular region or a nation.(10) code-switching: the movement back and forth between two languages or dialectswithin the same sentence or discourse.(11) taboo: a word or expression that is prohibited by the polite society from general use.(12) euphemism: a word or phrase that replaces a taboo word or is used to avoid reference tocertain acts or subjects, e. g. “powder room” for “toilet”.2. Idiolects are varieties of a language used by individual speakers, with peculiarities ofpronunciation, grammar and vocabulary.3. A president who did not have an accent may refer to a president who speaks the standardlanguage. The standard language is a particular variety of a language that is officially given a status higher than any other, and therefore a domi nant or prestigious variety. The standard language is usually based on the speech and writing of educated native speakers of the language and is generally used in government documents,education, broadcasting and printing. A good president is expected to speak theprestigious variety of his language.4. Language planning is usually done by a government or government agency which concernsthe choice of national or official language(s), ways of spreading the use of the language(s), spell reforms, the addition of new words to the language, and other language problems. In order to carry it out effectively, the official attemptmay concentrate on either the status of a language with regard to some other language or variety or its internal condition with a view to changing it. Language planning usually involves two aspects:status planning and corpus planning. Status planning changes the function of a language ora variety of a language and the right of those who use it. And corpus planning seeks todevelop a variety of language or a language, usually to standardize it, that is, to provide it with the means for serving most language functions in society. Governments may take both sides into consideration.5. A pidgin is a special language variety that mixes or blends languages and it is used by peoplewho speak different languages for restricted purposes such as trading. Pidgin arose from a blending of several languages such as Chinese dialects and English. Typically pidgins havea limited vocabulary and a much reduced grammatical structure characterized by the lossof inflections, gender and case. When a pidgin has become the primary language of aspeech community, and is acquired by the children of that speech community as theirnative language, it is said to have become a creole. The structure of the original pidgin is expanded to enable it to fulfill its new functions. The vocabulary is vastly enriched, and new syntactic-semantic concepts developed. Notable examples ofcreole are the English-based creole of Haiti.6. There are many euphemisms for toilet, such as WC, powder room, Men’s room, Ladies’room, Gentlemen, bathroom, restroom and so on. In many cultures, people avoid referringto this place by “toilet” or “lavatory” becaus e they are unpleasant to the ear. The use ofeuphemisms reflects social attitudes or social customs. We choose the words or expressions of euphemism because they are more polite or pleasant to use without embarrassing others.7. There are two possible reasons. One reason is that women are usually morestatus-conscious than men and they are aware of their lower status in society and as aresult, they may use more standard speech forms in their attempt to claimequality or even achieve a higher social status. The other reason might be attrib-uted to the education. Women are educated to behave “like a lady” when they are little girls, andsuch education may influence their speech as well. (The answersare quite open) (1) psycholinguistics: the study of the relation between language and mind: the mentalstructures and processes which are involved in the acquisition, comprehension andproduction of language.(2) language production: the process involved in creating and expressing meaning throughlanguage, such as the four successive stages provided by Levelt (1989):conceptualization, formulation, articulation and self-regulation.(3) language comprehension: From a psycholinguistic point of view, we store a great deal ofinformation about the properties of the language, and retrieve this information when we understand language. Besides, language comprehension can be treated in fourlevels: sound, word, sentence and text comprehensions.(4) Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis: I t refers to the view that the language system could influence oreven determine one’s thought, and a particular language imposes particular ideas of nature or beliefs of one’s culture.(5) linguistic determinism: One’s language structure determi nes his cognitive structure.That is, learning a language may change the way a person thinks or perceives the objective world.(6) linguistic relativity: As one’s language influences one’s cognitive system,speakers of different languages perceive the world differently.2. Psycholinguistics is the study of psychological aspects of language; it usuallyinvestigates the psychological states and mental activities associated with the use oflanguage. Most problems in psycholinguistics are comparatively more concrete,involving the study of language acquisition especially in children andlinguistic performance such as producing and comprehending utterances orsentences among adults. However, theoretical linguistics is more objective. It usuallyinvestigates the existing phenomena about languages and its investigations are usuallycarried out in the branches of microlinguistics: phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntaxand semantics. Psycholinguistics is an interdisciplinary study of language andpsychology, with structural linguistics and cognitive psychology as itsroots whiletheoretical linguistics solely focuses on aspects of language.3. (1) The correct form is “They swam across the lake”, which is caused byexchange. (2) The correct form is “The spy was bound and gagged” , which is caused by exchange. (3) The correct form is “I will see you in the park”, which originates from substitution.4. The slip-of-the-tongue phenomenon described above can be explained by theparallel distributed processing (PDP) approach in word comprehension. The PDP approach holds that people use several separate and parallel processes at the same time to understand spoken or written language. In the slip-of-the-tongue phenomenon, people have already conceptualized his/her idea (thought), but can not find a proper word to express the idea. This shows that thought precedes language. According tolinguistic determinism, language shapes one’s thought. If there isn’t language, there should be no thought. Thus, this phenomenon goes against linguistic determinism andshows that thought can exist with or without language.5. The fact mentioned here flies at the face of linguistic determinism which says that one’slanguage structure determines one’s cognitive structure. That’s to say, a particular language can not shape one’s world view. Language changes al ong social changes. Andsocial changes can lead to the changes of people’s view. At the same time, one’s worl d view can affect a particular language. For example, Xiaojie was used to refer to thedaughter of rich and important families before 1949. Then, since 1949, great changes have taken place in China. The world view of Chinese people has changed radically but the language has changed little. During the Cultural Revolution, Xiaojie became very much culturally loaded —young women not belonging to ‘the revolutionary rank’ and people not to be politically trusted. After 1979, it gradually became popular again, and now it has taken on a derogatory meaning (hooker). As it is mentioned above, it is socialchanges that shape one’s world view, and it is cognitive structure that affects language.。