东南大学2004基础英语与写作答案

  • 格式:pdf
  • 大小:1008.35 KB
  • 文档页数:14

下载文档原格式

  / 1
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

东南大学

2004年攻读硕士学位研究生入学考试试题

试题编号:318 试题名称:基础英语与写作

Ⅰ. Reading Comprehension (50 points)

真题1(东南大学2004年研)Directions: Below each of the following passages, you will find questions or incomplete statements about the passage. Each statement or question is followed by lettered words or expressions. Select the word or expression that most satisfactorily completes each statement or answers each question in accordance with the meaning of the passage. On your answer sheet, blacken the letter A,

B, C or D for the answer you choose.

Passage 1

In the 1350s poor countrymen began to have cottages and gardens which they could call their own. Were these fourteenth-century peasants, then, the originators of the cottage garden? Not really: the making and planting of small mixed gardens had been pioneered by others, and the cottager had at least two good examples which he could follow. His garden plants might and to some extent did come from the surrounding countryside, but a great many came from the monastery gardens. As to the general plan of the small garden, in so far as it had one at all, that had its origin not in the country, but in the town.

The first gardens to be developed and planted by the owners or tenants of small houses, town cottages as it were, were almost certainly those of the suburbs of the free cities of Italy and Germany in the early Middle Ages. Thus the suburban garden, far from being a descendant of the country cottage garden, is its ancestor; and older, in all probability, by about two centuries. On the face of it a paradox, in fact this is really logical enough; it was in such towns that there first emerged a class of man who was free and who, without being rich, owned his own small house: a craftsman or tradesman protected by his guild from the great barons, and from the petty ones too. Moreover, it was in the towns, rather than in the country, where the countryside provided herbs and even wild vegetables, that men needed to cultivate pot-herbs and salads. It was also in the towns that there existed a demand for market-garden produce.

London lagged well behind the Italian, Flemish, German and French free cities in this bourgeois progress towards the freedom of having a garden; yet, as early as the thirteenth century, well before the Black Death, Fitz Steven, biographer of Thomas a Becket, was writing that, in London: ‘On all sides outside the houses of the citizens who dwell in the suburbs there are adjoining gardens planted with trees, both spacious and pleasing to the sight’.

Then there is the monastery garden, quoted often as a ‘source’ of the cottage garden in innumerable histories of gardening. The gardens of the great religious establishments of the eighth and ninth centuries had two origins: St. Augustine, copying the Greek ‘academe’ did his teaching in a small garden presented to him for that purpose by a rich friend; thus the idea of a garden-school, which began among the Greek philosophers, was carried on by the Christian church. In the second place, since one of the charities undertaken by most religious orders was that of healing, monasteries and nunneries needed a garden of medicinal herbs. Such physic gardens were soon supplemented by vegetable, salad and fruit gardens in those monasteries which enjoined upon their members the duty of raising their own food, or at least a part of it. They tended next to develop, willy-nilly into flower gardens simply many of the herbaceous plants grown for medicinal purposes, or for their fragrance as strewing herbs, had pretty flowers--for example, violets, marjoram, pinks, primroses, madonna lilies and roses. In due course these flowers came to be grown for their own sakes, especially since some of them, lilies and roses notably, had a ritual or religious significance of their own. The madonna lily had been Aphrodite’s symbolic flower, it became Mary’s ; yet’ its first association with horticulture was economic; a salve or ointment was made from the bulb.

Much earlier than is commonly realized, certain monastic gardeners were making remarkable progress in

第 1 页共14 页