保持联系却仍旧孤单文本
- 格式:doc
- 大小:25.00 KB
- 文档页数:2
散文:在有我们的地方,他们依旧感到孤单在有我们的地方,他们依旧感到孤单刚刚走地街上,看着来往的行人,我一个也不认识,尽管在这个城市里有很多人我认识。
突然想起妈妈走在这个街上的时候是不是还不如我?是不是还有一点慌恐?最少是不是有一点觉得孤单?公公是最先走近我们的人了。
那年我们还刚毕业,老公还刚当一个部门的老总,公公和婆婆就在老家来了电话,说我们一年多没回家,让公公来看看我们。
那时候还没有多少人尤其是家里的亲戚走到我们公司来。
公公来了,那天是我接的他。
当看到公公站在那里的那一时,我的泪就在眼睛里转,我的亲人还是在这个城市里出现了。
把公公安排好,我自己下厨做饭,炒了几个菜我真的不记得了,只记得好坏是多久以前了?我还没有怀上我的女儿。
老公下班回来了,我没看到老公眼里的泪水,但是老公从厨房里端过一盆热水,什么话也没说,只说爹洗洗脚。
当他蹲下去的那一时,我竟泪流不止。
可是就是这样的好仍旧没有留住公公回老家的决心。
我和老公当然不同意,大老远的来了怎么地也呆一段日子呵,可是在公公用了多少个借口都不管用的时候,公公采用了另一个战术,在我们要睡的时候,公公来到我和老公的房间门口,哼着说:“孩子们,我病了,难受呵。
”我和老公赶紧叫来了车,送公公到医院,通过各种检查,结果我们让晚上急诊室的太夫老实地训了:“一个没病的人你们拉来做什么?”公公走了,老公送的,陪他转了一个城市。
我好长时间解不开,自己好茶好饭弄得别的同事都以为是我自己的爸爸,老公尽心尽力,我们到底哪里不好?公公为什么要一心回到那个他住的地方?一个偏僻的村庄?后来,我有了孩子,因为母亲没有工作,也因为母亲有家里没有什么活计,母亲当然地成了我女儿的姥姥妈妈。
在一个有我没有我的白天晚上,都是母亲在侍候着抚育着我的女儿。
当然我和老公也极尽了孝道,母亲常说:“:我的姑爷比我女儿好。
”搞得我呀在家在外都是一个恶人,恶妇。
我问过母亲想不想家,母亲从来都说不想。
当时工作忙,母亲说不想我自然觉得母亲在我这里是幸福的。
有一种深爱,叫做不在联系本文从网络收集而来,上传到平台为了帮到更多的人,如果您需要使用本文档,请点击下载按钮下载本文档(有偿下载),另外祝您生活愉快,工作顺利,万事如意!有一种深爱,叫做不再联系独自一人,坐在电脑前,单曲循环放着放着忧伤的情歌,安安静静在忧伤的音乐中独醉,闭上眼,这一瞬间,我很是思念那个她,一直以来很爱的她,一直没有机会在一起的她,我突然明白一句话,有一种深爱,叫做不再联系。
有没有一个人,曾经让你发了疯地想念,现在却拼了命地想忘。
或许曾经思念过,或许曾经疯狂过,或许曾经专一过,或许曾经深爱过,或许曾经狠狠地被伤过,那么多的或许,那么多的曾经,该用何种语言去叙述那些刻骨铭心的致命曾经呢。
剧情再好,终究是戏,其实早已落幕,向来情深,奈何缘浅?只是,我还是眷恋着那些我的曾经,如今,我只能用文字装下我所有的心中装不下的思念和刻骨铭心的眷恋。
世间有一种爱,明明是深爱,却注定不能完美;明明是深爱,却不得不离开;明明是深爱,却要苦苦等待。
有一种爱,不再联系,却拼了命惦着,明知道这样没有结果,只会空了等待,伤了又伤,我却依旧守候,不离不弃这份深情,明知前方无明路,但心却早已收不回来。
我一直深爱,我没有奢求,没有怨言,没有谁对谁错,没有祈求什么,我只能沉浸在这样的结局中,任时间如流水般划过……我的爱,依旧守候在原地,沉默的日子,依然继续上演着,离开后,将每一份思念都寄托在这些文字之中,或许只有自己才能领会这种深爱却又不能在一起的痛苦,我在特定的时间,特定的场合,选择刻意的逃避,也算是对自己唯一的救赎方式,也是对她一种深爱的救赎方式吧。
很多人以为,自己转身后,一定还可以和自己心爱的人再可以见面,留在自己心里的,全都是明日重见的希望。
但是这个人的每一次,他自己放手,在转身的瞬间。
有些事情却完全改变了。
太阳落下去,在它重新升起前,有些人从此和自己心爱的人永别了!记得你说过,有些话注定要烂在心里,有些伤害需要大家一起化解!我想,也包括那句我爱你吧。
TED英语演讲Why we are connected but still feel alone?为什么我们保持着联系却仍旧孤单?TED简介:我们对技术的期待越来越多,同时,我们对彼此的期待却越来越少了?电子产品和网络角色似乎正重新定义着人们的沟通和交流,Sherry Turkle致力于研究这种影响,并引发这样的深刻思考:我们究竟需要怎样的沟通方式。
演讲者:Sherry Turkle片长:20:51|英文演讲稿|Just a moment ago,my daughter Rebecca texted me for good luck.Her text said,"Mom,you will rock."I love this.Getting that text was like getting a hug.And so there you have it.I embody the central paradox.I'm a woman who loves getting texts who's going to tell you that too many of them can be a problem.Actually that reminder of my daughter brings me to the beginning of my story.1996,when I gave my first TEDTalk,Rebecca was five years old and she was sitting right there in the front row.I had just written a book that celebrated our life on the internet and I was about to be on the cover of Wired magazine.In those heady days,we were experimenting with chat rooms and online virtual communities.We were exploring different aspects of ourselves.And then we unplugged.I was excited.And,as a psychologist,what excited me most was the idea that we would use what we learned in the virtual world about ourselves,about our identity,to live better lives in the real world.Now fast-forward to2012.I'm back here on the TED stage again.My daughter's20.She's a college student.She sleeps with her cellphone,so do I.And I've just written a new book,but this time it's not one that will get me on the cover of Wired magazine.So what happened?I'm still excited by technology,but I believe,and I'm here to make the case,that we're letting it take us places that we don't want to go.Over the past15years,I've studied technologies of mobile communication and I've interviewed hundreds and hundreds of people,young and old,about their plugged in lives.And what I've found is that our little devices,those little devices in our pockets,are so psychologically powerful that they don't only change what we do,they change who we are.Some of the things we do now with our devices are things that,only a few years ago,we would have found odd or disturbing, but they've quickly come to seem familiar,just how we do things.So just to take some quick examples:People text or do email during corporate board meetings. They text and shop and go on Facebook during classes,during presentations,actually during all meetings.People talk to me about the important new skill of making eye contact while you're texting.(Laughter)People explain to me that it's hard,but that it can be done.Parents text and do email at breakfast and at dinner while their children complain about not having their parents'full attention.But then these same children deny each other their full attention.This is a recent shot of my daughter and her friends being together while not being together.And we even text at funerals.I study this.We remove ourselves from our grief or from our revery and we go into our phones.Why does this matter?It matters to me because I think we're setting ourselves up for trouble—trouble certainly in how we relate to each other,but also trouble in how we relate to ourselves and our capacity for self-reflection.We're getting used to a new way of being alone together. People want to be with each other,but also elsewhere—connected to all the different places they want to be.People want to customize their lives.They want to go in and out of all the places they are because the thing that matters most to them is control over where they put their attention.So you want to go to that board meeting,but you only want to pay attention to the bits that interest you.And some people think that's a good thing.But you can end up hiding from each other,even as we're all constantly connected to each other.A50-year-old business man lamented to me that he feels he doesn't have colleagues anymore at work.When he goes to work,he doesn't stop by to talk to anybody,he doesn't call.And he says he doesn't want to interrupt his colleagues because,he says,"They're too busy on their email." But then he stops himself and he says,"You know,I'm not telling you the truth.I'm the one who doesn't want to be interrupted.I think I should want to,but actually I'd rather just do things on my Blackberry."Across the generations,I see that people can't get enough of each other,if and only if they can have each other at a distance,in amounts they can control.I call it the Goldilocks effect:not too close,not too far,just right.But what might feel just right for that middle-aged executive can be a problem for an adolescent who needs to develop face-to-face relationships.An18-year-old boy who uses texting for almost everything says to me wistfully,"Someday,someday,but certainly not now,I'd like to learn how to have a conversation."When I ask people"What's wrong with having a conversation?"People say,"I'll tell you what's wrong with having a conversation.It takes place in real time and you can't control what you're going to say."So that's the bottom line.Texting,email,posting,all of these things let us present the self as we want to be.We get to edit,and that means we get to delete,and that means we get to retouch,the face,the voice,the flesh,the body—not too little,not too much,just right.Human relationships are rich and they're messy and they're demanding.And we clean them up with technology.And when we do,one of the things that can happen is that we sacrifice conversation for mere connection.We short-change ourselves.And over time,we seem to forget this,or we seem to stop caring.I was caught off guard when Stephen Colbert asked me a profound question,a profound question. He said,"Don't all those little tweets,don't all those little sips of online communication,add up to one big gulp of real conversation?"My answer was no,they don't add up.Connecting in sips may work for gathering discrete bits of information,they may work for saying,"I'm thinkingabout you,"or even for saying,"I love you,"—I mean,look at how I felt when I got that text from my daughter—but they don't really work for learning about each other,for really coming to know and understand each other.And we use conversations with each other to learn how to have conversations with ourselves.So a flight from conversation can really matter because it can compromise our capacity for self-reflection.For kids growing up,that skill is the bedrock of development.Over and over I hear,"I would rather text than talk."And what I'm seeing is that people get so used to being short-changed out of real conversation,so used to getting by with less,that they've become almost willing to dispense with people altogether.So for example,many people share with me this wish,that some day a more advanced version of Siri,the digital assistant on Apple's iPhone,will be more like a best friend,someone who will listen when others won't.I believe this wish reflects a painful truth that I've learned in the past15years.That feeling that no one is listening to me is very important in our relationships with technology.That's why it's so appealing to have a Facebook page or a Twitter feed—so many automatic listeners.And the feeling that no one is listening to me make us want to spend time with machines that seem to care about us. We're developing robots,they call them sociable robots,that are specifically designed to be companions—to the elderly,to our children,to us.Have we so lost confidence that we will be there for each other?During my research I worked in nursing homes,and I brought in these sociable robots that were designed to give the elderly the feeling that they were understood.And one day I came in and a woman who had lost a child was talking to a robot in the shape of a baby seal.It seemed to be looking in her eyes.It seemed to be following the conversation.It comforted her.And many people found this amazing.But that woman was trying to make sense of her life with a machine that had no experience of the arc of a human life.That robot put on a great show.And we're vulnerable.People experience pretend empathyas though it were the real thing.So during that moment when that woman was experiencing that pretend empathy,I was thinking,"That robot can't empathize.It doesn't face death.It doesn't know life."And as that woman took comfort in her robot companion,I didn't find it amazing;I found it one of the most wrenching,complicated moments in my15years of work.But when I stepped back,I felt myself at the cold,hard center of a perfect storm.We expect more from technology and less from each other.And I ask myself,"Why have things come to this?"And I believe it's because technology appeals to us most where we are most vulnerable.And we are vulnerable.We're lonely,but we're afraid of intimacy.And so from social networks to sociable robots,we're designing technologies that will give us the illusion of companionship without the demands of friendship.We turn to technology to help us feel connected in ways we can comfortably control.But we're not so comfortable.We are not so much in control.These days,those phones in our pockets are changing our minds and hearts because they offer us three gratifying fantasies.One,that we can put our attention wherever we want it to be;two,that we will always be heard;and three,that we will never have to be alone.And that third idea, that we will never have to be alone,is central to changing our psyches.Because the moment that people are alone,even for a few seconds,they become anxious,they panic,they fidget,they reach for a device.Just think of people at a checkout line or at a red light.Being alone feels like a problem that needs to be solved.And so people try to solve it by connecting.But here, connection is more like a symptom than a cure.It expresses,but it doesn't solve,an underlying problem.But more than a symptom,constant connection is changing the way people think of themselves.It's shaping a new way of being.The best way to describe it is,I share therefore I am.We use technology to define ourselves by sharing our thoughts and feelings even as we're having them.So before it was:I have a feeling,I want to make a call.Now it's:I want to have a feeling,I need to send a text.The problem with this new regime of"I share therefore I am"is that,if we don't have connection,we don't feel like ourselves.We almost don't feel ourselves.So what do we do?We connect more and more.But in the process,we set ourselves up to be isolated.How do you get from connection to isolation?You end up isolated if you don't cultivate the capacity for solitude,the ability to be separate,to gather yourself.Solitude is where you find yourself so that you can reach out to other people and form real attachments.When we don't have the capacity for solitude,we turn to other people in order to feel less anxious or in order to feel alive.When this happens,we're not able to appreciate who they are.It's as though we're using them as spare parts to support our fragile sense of self.We slip into thinking that always being connected is going to make us feel less alone.But we're at risk,because actually it's the opposite that's true.If we're not able to be alone,we're going to be more lonely.And if we don't teach our children to be alone,they're only going to know how to be lonely.When I spoke at TED in1996,reporting on my studies of the early virtual communities,I said, "Those who make the most of their lives on the screen come to it in a spirit of self-reflection." And that's what I'm calling for here,now:reflection and,more than that,a conversation about where our current use of technology may be taking us,what it might be costing us.We're smitten with technology.And we're afraid,like young lovers,that too much talking might spoil the romance.But it's time to talk.We grew up with digital technology and so we see it as all grown up.But it's not,it's early days.There's plenty of time for us to reconsider how we use it,how we build it.I'm not suggesting that we turn away from our devices,just that we develop a more self-aware relationship with them,with each other and with ourselves.I see some first steps.Start thinking of solitude as a good thing.Make room for it.Find ways to demonstrate this as a value to your children.Create sacred spaces at home—the kitchen,the dining room—and reclaim them for conversation.Do the same thing at work.At work,we're so busy communicating that we often don't have time to think,we don't have time to talk,about the things that really matter.Change that.Most important,we all really need to listen to each other,including to the boring bits.Because it's when we stumble or hesitate or lose our words that we reveal ourselves to each other.Technology is making a bid to redefine human connection—how we care for each other,how we care for ourselves—but it's also giving us the opportunity to affirm our values and our direction.I'm optimistic.We have everything we need to start.We have each other.And we have the greatest chance of success if we recognize our vulnerability.That we listen when technology says it will take something complicated and promises something simpler.So in my work,I hear that life is hard,relationships are filled with risk.And then there's technology—simpler,hopeful,optimistic,ever-young.It's like calling in the cavalry.An ad campaign promises that online and with avatars,you can"Finally,love your friends love your body,love your life,online and with avatars."We're drawn to virtual romance,to computer games that seem like worlds,to the idea that robots,robots,will someday be our true companions.We spend an evening on the social network instead of going to the pub with friends.But our fantasies of substitution have cost us.Now we all need to focus on the many,many ways technology can lead us back to our real lives,our own bodies,our own communities,our own politics,our own planet.They need us.Let's talk about how we can use digital technology,the technology of our dreams,to make this life the life we can love.Thank you.(Applause)几分钟前,我接到了我女儿的短信,她说你一定会震惊全场,我太喜欢这个了,接到这条短信就像得到了她的拥抱。
除了陪伴我还喜欢孤独美文如果我们忘记时间,或许会忘记所有,而这所有包括了孤独与陪伴,即便我们仍旧生活在孤独或陪伴的长河之中。
我们会和一个人聊天,聊得忘记了白天与黑夜,沉浸在两人的世界,无关他人。
这两个人可能是朋友、陌生人、暗恋的人,或许还是热恋中的青年男女。
但我们都知道,很多东西不是相互的,甚至相反。
就像我认识你,你不认识我;我喜欢你,你不喜欢我。
有一个男生在追求女生,但是女生并不喜欢男生,聊了许久之后,女生问道:“你在干嘛呢?”“现在?“嗯嗯”“和喜欢的人聊天呀“哦哦”“你平时什么时候睡觉呀”“一般11:00左右”“现在12:00了......”......男生因为和自己喜欢的女孩说话,忘记了时间,忘记了所有,所以并不会感到困意,甚至孤独。
但是对于女生而言,并不是如此,或许她不会有任何的情感变化,甚至厌烦。
但,总是有人因此不再孤独。
有时候,我们给了别人陪伴,而自己却是孤独的。
去年,一个朋友打了电话给我,从电话声中,我听出她很是伤心。
通话结束后,我看看时间,差不多一个半小时。
可,在这个时间段内,我们说了什么呢?原来她的一位男性朋友和自己的一位女性朋友玩得特别好,其实这本没什么问题。
但问题是,那两个人并不认识,是通过我的这位朋友认识的。
但是,现在他们的关系已超过了自己所能承受的范围(也就是说,那位男生对她,比那位女性朋友要好),所以对他们很失望。
当时,我很直接地说了一句:你是嫉妒。
感觉她很难过,所以也给她分析了一下:“朋友是有等级的。
你们虽然先认识,但是他们可能更投缘,所以你不要太在意。
就像如果我和你那位朋友,同时在你面前,你对待哪位朋友会好一点呢?”“我会平等对待,不会有区别的。
”当时,听到这句话,我心中有说不出的感觉。
“不可能的,你无法平等对待,因为很多东西,会在你无意识中表现出来,特别是情感”“不会的,关键是,是我先认识他,他怎么对待我能比对她好呢?”........后来,经过一段时间的交流,她的态度有所转变,而这也是我所希望的局面。
雪莉·特克尔演讲:保持联系,却依旧孤独雪莉·特克尔(SherryTurkle),MIT教授,主要研究科技、社会、人工智能、自我、心理领域,临床心理学家,与大家探讨了当下“人”与“科技”的问题,著有《群体性孤独》一书。
今天小编给大家分享一篇雪莉·特克尔的精彩演讲,希望对大家有所帮助。
雪莉·特克尔演讲:保持联系,却依旧孤独几分钟之前我的女儿Rebecca发了一条短信为我加油。
她说“妈妈,你会震撼全场的!”我太喜欢这个了接到这条短信就像得到了她的拥抱。
所以大家看到了我自己就处在这样一个核心矛盾里。
我自己非常喜欢收短信但却要告诉大家太多的短信会成为一个大问题。
事实上,我的女儿让我想起了这个故事的开端。
1996年我第一次在TED演讲的时候Rebecca只有5岁她就坐在那里最前排。
那时我刚刚写了一本书,庆祝我们的网络新生活而且将要成为《连线》杂志Wired的封面人物。
在那些令人陶醉的日子里,我们体验着网络聊天室和在线虚拟社区。
我们正从不同的角度探索自己,然后我们回到现实中来,我对此感到非常兴奋。
作为一个心理学家,最令我兴奋的就是这样的理念:我们会运用我们在虚拟世界中对自己,对我们自身认同的了解,改善我们的现实生活。
现在让我们快进到20xx年我又重新回到了TED的讲台。
我的女儿已经是一名20岁的大学生了。
她睡觉都抱着她的手机,其实我也是。
我刚刚完成了一本新书,但是这一本却不会让我登上《连线》杂志的封面。
那这十几年间发生了什么呢?我仍然为科技而兴奋但是我相信并且想要向大家说明我们正在放任科技它将我们带向歧途。
在过去的20xx年间我一直在研究移动通信技术的影响并且访问了成百上千的人,年轻的或年长的了解他们的“移动生活”。
我发现我们口袋中那些轻巧的电子设备在心理学上有着如此强大的力量它们不仅改变了我们的生活方式也改变了我们本身。
我们现在用电子设备做的一些事情在几年前还被认为是稀奇或让人讨厌,但是很快大家就习以为常——只是我们的行事方式而已。
保持联系却仍旧孤单演讲稿大家好,我是今天的演讲者。
今天我想和大家分享的主题是“保持联系却仍旧孤单”。
这个话题或许在我们每个人的生活中都有一些共鸣,因为在这个信息爆炸的时代,我们似乎越来越难以真正地和他人建立起深刻的联系,即使我们在社交网络上有着众多的朋友,但内心却感到孤独。
那么,为什么我们会有这样的感受呢?我想通过这次演讲,和大家一起探讨这个问题,并寻找一些解决的办法。
首先,让我们来看看为什么我们会感到孤单。
在这个快节奏的社会中,人们往往忙于工作、学习等各种事务,时间都被安排得满满的,很少有时间去和朋友们坐下来好好聊聊天。
即使我们在社交网络上能够随时和朋友们保持联系,但这种联系却往往只停留在表面,缺乏真正的沟通和交流。
另外,现代科技的发展也让我们更容易沉溺于虚拟世界,忽略了身边真实的人际关系。
这些因素都导致了我们在人际交往中感到越来越孤单。
那么,面对这样的情况,我们应该怎么办呢?首先,我认为我们需要更多地关注身边的人。
无论是家人、朋友还是同事,我们都需要花更多的时间和精力去倾听他们的心声,关心他们的生活。
只有通过真正的交流,我们才能建立起深厚的情感联系。
其次,我们也需要主动融入到社交活动中去。
可以参加一些兴趣小组、志愿者活动,结识更多的朋友,拓展自己的社交圈子。
通过参与各种社交活动,我们可以更好地融入社会,减少孤独感。
最后,我们也需要学会适当地利用科技手段,比如视频通话、语音聊天等,来和远方的朋友保持联系,让他们感受到我们的关心和思念。
总的来说,保持联系却仍旧孤单是一个现代人普遍面临的问题。
但是,只要我们用心去经营人际关系,主动融入社交活动,适当利用科技手段,就能够有效地缓解这种孤独感。
希望我们每个人都能够在这个快节奏的社会中找到属于自己的情感归属,让我们不再感到孤单。
谢谢大家!。
孤独寂寞的说说:有个人,只想念,不联系;只关注,不打扰导读:本文是关于孤独寂寞的说说:有个人,只想念,不联系;只关注,不打扰的文章,如果觉得很不错,欢迎点评和分享!一、有个人,只想念,不联系;只关注,不打扰。
二、无论你在那里,想得都是你,只想在你身边。
三、童话始终都是童话。
梦醒了只是一场空。
你懂吗。
四、你真的爱我的话,我哭你不会觉得开心,而是心疼。
五、可是到底怎样才能学会爱,你明明知道我连自己都不爱。
六、嘴上说着单身挺好,可是看到情侣,还是会沉默。
七、爱一个人是我的权利,恨一个人是我的选择。
八、心痛比快乐更真实,爱为何这样的讽刺,我忘了这是第几次,一见你就无法坚持。
九、如果没记错,你已经好久没说你爱我了。
十、当我们的爱结束以后,其实连回忆都不曾留下。
十一、现在的我早已学会了坚强。
十二、就算我们不能彼此拥有,但是回忆是专属自己的。
十三、囿的祗囿沵知道。
可是失去了一切珍惜德机会。
十四、不要和我说对不起,我们早已谁都不欠谁的。
十五、当你处在悬崖边上时,别人大多数会选择踹你一脚而不是拉你一把。
十六、我爱你不是因为你是谁,而是我在你面前可以是谁。
十七、我早上看时间不是为了看几点了,而是为了看还可以睡多久。
十八、我想要的不过是一个不管多难都始终会在我身边的人,仅此而已。
十九、对酒唱歌、就算无人欣赏、至少还有你陪伴。
二十、分手后的思念、注定就是犯賤?二十一、我想我会一直陪着你,直到地老天荒。
二十二、最大的秘密从来不是任何可见的东西,而是思想。
二十三、风决定了蒲公英的方向,你决定了我的悲伤。
二十四、成功的信念在人膞中的作用就如鬧鐘,會在你需要時將你喚醒。
二十五、想要解释,却被认为解释永远是多余的,更加被认为是借口。
二十六、喝得烂醉如泥,思想反而特清醒。
二十七、我再也没有离开你的力气了。
二十八、这么倾其所有的相爱就是为了一辈子只得到你的青睐。
二十九、星空的美好远不足你眼眸柔情十万分之一。
三十、我忘记了时间,却忘记不了你的脸。
孤单整改报告怎么写范文
孤单整改报告(范文)
尊敬的领导/主管:
根据您的要求,我特此向您提交我个人的孤单整改报告,以反映并改进我在工作中的问题。
首先,我承认自己在工作中存在孤单的状况,工作上缺乏与同事的有效沟通与协作,影响了团队的凝聚力和工作效率。
在回顾自己的工作过程中,我发现以下几个原因导致了这种情况的出现:
1.个人性格原因:由于自身性格内向,我较为害羞,不善于主动与他人交流,并且对于工作中的问题多采取自行解决的方式。
2.缺乏沟通技巧:在与同事交流时,我意识到自己在表达问题和观点时存在欠缺,缺乏掌握有效沟通技巧的能力。
3.自我肯定心态不足:因为对自己的工作怀有一定的不安全感,总是担心自己的意见和建议不被接受,导致在团队讨论中表达意见的时机被错过。
为了改进这些问题,我已经采取了以下具体措施:
1.主动参加团队活动:我积极地参加部门举办的团队活动,增进了与同事之间的交流和了解,提高了团队的凝聚力。
2.学习沟通技巧:我已经开始关注沟通技巧的书籍和培训课程,学习如何更好地表达自己的观点和倾听他人的意见,以建立良好的沟通关系。
3.加强自我肯定:我正努力提高自身的专业素质和业务能力,通过不断学习和实践来增加对工作的自信,使自己更有底气地表达意见和建议。
在今后的工作中,我将继续努力改进自己,加强与同事们的交流与协作,不再孤单工作。
我相信通过这些努力,我能在今后的工作中取得更好的成绩,为团队和组织的发展做出更大的贡献。
再次感谢您的关注和支持,并请您监督和指导我的改进工作。
如果您有任何其他建议或要求,请随时告知,我将会及时跟进并配合完成。
谢谢!
此为示例,具体内容请根据实际情况进行修改完善。
【想念的句子】相爱时,明明是两个人,却为何感觉只是独自一人相爱时,明明是两个人,却为何感觉只是独自一人?分开后,明明只是独自一人,却为何依然解脱不了两个人?感情的寂寞,大概在于:爱和解脱,都无法彻底。
那一刻,我意识到我是多么地爱你,多么地想你。
一直在等一个人,一个关心我在意我的人,一个懂得包容体谅我的人,一个也许并不完美但懂得珍惜我的人;一直在等一个人,一个与我相亲相爱的人,一个我们相互都喜欢的人。
常常想一个人,反而会模糊了影子,只剩下依稀的几个片段。
回忆里那些许的画面,却让人纠缠。
对一份感情的坚持,好比一个人行走在荒漠之上,烈日炎炎,无水,无粮,无绿洲,前进是绝望的遥远,后退是死寂的空无。
因此,真正的痛苦,没有谁能与你分担,你只能把它从一个肩,换到另一个肩。
没有你,没有争吵,没有眼泪,亦没有快乐。
我很想念你,只是我的骄傲,我的固执,我的任性不会允许我先低头。
对不起,我依然爱着你,你依旧是我的伤。
如果我有爱人,我希望以我的全部,换得这一秒钟。
因为,拥有这样一的秒钟,心是踏实的,爱是可靠的,幸福是手掌心里的。
有一种幸福叫平淡,有一种快乐叫相守,有一种思念是对你永远的关怀,不管在哪样的生命,你总是我最在乎的最爱。
最近你还好吗?挣扎和思念,都怕你听见,如何遮掩,对你痴痴地爱恋,一颗温柔的心跳在黑夜里独眠,想你,是我永远的语言!生活就是这样,没有谁会永远陪在我们身边,我们应该学会一个人面对生活中的种种,虽然一个人真的好孤单,但我们依然要面对一个人的生活不是吗?一个人的路虽然不是很好走,可我们依然要坚强的走下去……走到地老天荒,走到夕阳西下……一个人又如何,完全可以过得比任何人都好。
随着时光飞逝逐渐长大的我们,总会在远离的时候,回头看看,那些,曾经的美好。
生活总有一个平衡,好与坏,爱与恨。
快乐与悲伤,热闹与寂寞,不可以改变的。
我们不必恐慌,患得患失的话,它将一无所有。
能够自己做的就尽量自己去做,不要依靠别人。
一个人孤独的说说,等待回应的日子长了,真是坚持不住了呢1、一开始,他的喜欢是藏不住,但后来,他的冷漠也很明显,哈哈哈,不要回忆,要自信的让他原地爆炸。
2、后来你不再问我在干嘛,我也不再问我的男朋友去了哪里了。
3、等待回应的日子长了,真是坚持不住了呢!4、你不知道你的拒绝多过分。
果然被追的人都是高傲的。
第一次也是最后一次追别人了。
嗯,就这样。
5、我终于熬过那段看谁都像你,干什么都会想去你,连歌也都是关于你的日子,很庆幸我终于可以不问归期,不再想你。
6、当初为了你才学会的打游戏,后来发现游戏比你有趣多了,你算什么东西?7、张爱玲说;我以为爱可以填满人生的遗憾,而制造更多遗憾的,偏偏是爱??。
8、他不爱我,而每个人的付出都是有限的,再见前任。
9、你找她,她可以和你聊天也可以和很多人一起聊天甚至可以只回表情敷衍你,她不是只有你傻孩子醒醒,不要再喜欢她了。
10、不再联系不是不爱,只是因为怕自己收不到你的回信让自己伤心!11、没有谁会一直主动的去联系一个人,但是喜欢也会累。
去找一个愿意跟你说废话的人谈恋爱吧。
因为在乎你,所以余生全是你。
不在乎你,连一点时间都不愿分给你。
12、我以为我的主动,热情,乖巧,总会渗透到你心里,可我错了,从一开始,你只是玩玩,而我却当真了。
13、你不回消息,我就继续等,我给你找了个借口,忙,没关系,我坚信你忙完会来找我,可我不知道的是,我还能坚持多久,还能为你找多少借口。
14、你无法叫醒一个不回你消息的人,但是红包却可以。
15、有时候,会毫无预兆的想起某个人,无关风月,只是那几秒,很快又归于平静。
16、主动久了真的会累,那种全世界都是黑色的感觉,怕是只有自己知道吧。
17、只要我们付出了真心,其它的就交给顺其自然,强扭的瓜不甜,没有必要强求,即使心痛,也就几年。
18、受够了每天漫无目的的等待。
受够了结束话题的永远是他。
受够了每天没有早安晚安。
受够了嗯嗯噢噢。
点开对话框说最后一句的永远是我。
Just a moment ago, my daughter Rebecca texted me for good luck. Her text said, mom, you will rock. I love this. Getting that text was like getting a hug. And so there you have it, I embody the central paradox. I'm a woman who loves getting text, who's going to tell you that too many of them can be problem. Actually, that reminder of my daughter brings me to the beginning of my story, 1996, when I gave my first TED Talk. Rebecca was 5 years old and she was sitting right there in the front row. I had just written a book that celebrated our life on the internet and I was about to be on the cover of Wired Magazine. In those heyday days, we were experimenting with chat rooms and online virtual communities. We were exploring different aspects of ourselves and then we unclocked. I was excited, and as a psychologist, what excited me most was the idea that we would use what we learned in the virtual world about ourselves, about our identify to live better lives in the world. Now, fast forward to 2012, I'm back here on the TED stage again. My daughter is 20. She is a college student. She sleeps with her cellphone, so do I and I've just written anew book, but this time, it's not one that will get me on the cover of Wired Magazine. So, what happened? I'm still excited by technology, but I believe and I'm here to make the case that we're letting it take us places that we don't wanna go. Over the past 15 years, I've studied technologies of mobile communication and I've interviewed hundreds and hundreds of people, young and old about their plugged in lives and what I found is that our little devices, those little devices in our pockets are so psychologically powerful that they don't only change what we do. They change who we are. Some of the things we do now with our devices are things that only a few years ago would have found odd or disturbing, but they've quickly come to seem familiar just how we do things, so just to take some quick examples, people text or e-mail during corporate board meetings. They text and shop and go on Facebook during classes, during presentations, actually during all meetings. People talked to me about the important new skill of making eye contact while your texting. People explained to me that it's hard, that it can be done. Parents text and do e-mail at breakfast and at dinner where your children complained about not having their parents' full attention, but then the same children deny each other their full attention. This is a recent shot of my daughter and her friends being together while not being together. And we even text to funerals.I study this. We remove ourselves from our grief or from our reverie and we go in our phones. Why does this matter. It matters to me because I think we're saving ourselves up for trouble. Trouble certainly and how we relate to each other, but also trouble in how we relate to ourselves in our capacity for self reflection. We're getting used to a new way of being alone together. People want to be with each other, but also elsewhere connected to all the different places they wanna be. People want to customize their lives. They want to go in and out of all the places they are because the thing that matters most to them is control over where they putt their attention. So, you wanna go to that board meeting, but you only wanna pay attention to the bits that interest you, and some people think that's a good thing, but you can end up hiding from each other even as we're all constantly connected to each other. 50-year-old businessman laments to me that he feels he doesn't have colleagues anymore at work. When he goes to work, he doesn't stop by to talk to anybody he doesn't call and he says he doesn't want to interrupt his colleagues because he says they are too busy on their e-mail, but then he stops himself and he says, you know, I'm not tell you the truth. I'm the one who doesn't want to be interrupted. I think I should want to, but actually I'd rather just do things on my Blackberry (RIMM) . Across the generations, I see that people tend to get enough with each other if and only if they can have each other at a distance in amounts they can control. I call it the Goldilocks effect, not too close, not too far, just right, but what might feel just right forthat middle aged executive can be a problem for an adolescent who needs to develop face to face relationships. An 18-year-old boy who uses texting for almost everything says to me wishfully someday, someday but certainly not now I would like to learn how to have a conversation. When I ask people wrong with having a conversation? I'll tell you what's wrong with having a conversation. It takes place in real time and you can't control what you're gonna say. So, that's the bottom line; texting, e-mail, posting. All of these things let us present to self as we wanna be. We get to edit and that means we get to delete, and that means we get to retouch the face, the voice, the flesh, the body. Not too much, just right. Human relationships are rich and they are messy and they are demanding, and we clean them up with technology and when we do one of the things that can happen is that we sacrifice conversation for mere connection. We short change ourselves, and over time, we seemed to forget this or we seemed to stop caring. I caught off guard whenStephen Colbert asked me a profound question, a profound question. He said, "Don't all those little tweets, don't all those little SIPs of online communication add up to 1 big gulf real conversation?" My answer was no. They don't add up. Connecting in SIPs may work for gathering discrete bits of information. They may work for saying and thinking about you or even for saying I love you. I mean, look at how I felt when I got that text from my daughter, but they don't really work for learning about each other to really coming to know and understand each other, and we use conversations with each other to learn how to have conversations with ourselves. So, off light from conversation can really matter because it can compromise our capacity for self reflection. For kids growing up, that skill is the bed rock of development. Over and over, I hear, "I would rather text than talk." And what I'm seeing is that people get so used to being short change out real conversation, so used to getting by with less that they become almost willing to dispense with people altogether. So, for example, many people share with me this wish that someday a more advance version of Siri, the digital assistant on Apple's iPhone (AAPL) will be more like a best friend, someone who will listen when other won't. I believe this wish reflects a painful truth that I've learned in the past 15 years. The feeling that no one is listening to me is very important in our relationships with technology. That's why it's appealing to have a Facebook page or Twitter feed so many automatic listeners, and the feeling that no one is listening to me makes up one to spend time with machines that seemed to care about us. We're developing robots. They call them sociable robots that are specifically designed to be companions, to be elderly to our children, to us. Have we so lost confidence that we will be there for each other?。