反方二辩台词翻译
- 格式:docx
- 大小:13.52 KB
- 文档页数:1
反方二辩:科技发展是给我们的生活带来了好处,这点我们并没有否认.
但是我方认为科技带来的弊处大于利的.首先汽车虽方便了我们的出行,但
牌坊的尾气造成环境的污染,影响人类健康.其次,电视等娱乐设施的出现, 虽然给人们带来了方便,但是却无形的阻隔了人与人之间的交流 是人情淡
薄.还有就是网络的出现,是一些不法分子有了可乘之机,扰乱人们的生活等
等着一系列你们所谓的高科技所带
来的副作用 是不可否认 试问我们怎么
能坐视不理呢。
英语辩论赛二辩稿模板英语辩论赛二辩稿模板篇一:英语BP辩论反方二辩辩论稿反方二辩:Thank you,Mr.(Ms.)speaker. Ladies and gentlemen, good evening! providing extra incentives to scientists from universities and research institutions, therefore increasing innovation. This is wrong. Firstly, many scientists work for pharmaceutical companies directly . Secondly, scientists at universities and research institutions are paid by pharmaceutical companies to undertake research for them. Why is this important? It means that scientists are actually harmed under the proposition's model, not helped. When patents are removed,pharmaceutical companies can no longer earn monopoly profits.Now I’why we save more lives? Firstly, under our plan you can pay scientists double the bonuses they get paid and still get the job done way below the current cost. This is because we won’t have to pay $6-10 million a year for the CEO of the firm in question or billions in publicity. We’re also providing incentives for thesame companies to research novel drugs. Rather than fret over prices remaining high for 20 years to make a profit we're allowing them a generous research and development-linked profit on delivery. Secondly, we have the preposterous claim that university research is funded by corporations! The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, an industry lobby group, estimates that private industry finances only about 43% of drug development! Our plan allows foruniversities and government institutions to take on more research and even provide them with concrete benefits. Thirdly, more than 69% of those with HIV lack access to the medication to treat it. Rather than pay the current prices for that 69% for as long as they need them what we do is pay for them in a drastically cheaper one-off payment that would allow for generic copies to be made ad infinite. This way we also don't endorse current practice that actively discourages innovation but instead create a new regime that truly rewards it allowing everyone to benefit from genuinely novel drugs.。
1、反方二辩选择正方二辩反方二辩:请问对方二辩:你方既然认为“用人不疑、疑人不用”,为什么每个企业还要制定那么多的规章制度,还要那么多的稽查呢?比如我们公司的“三合一”检查,这不是对人的怀疑吗?正方二辩对方辩友,我们制定制度、进行检查,是担心员工犯错,但是担心并不是怀疑,我相信人有弱点,人是有错误的,人非圣贤,孰能无过,所以才建立制度、进行稽查,今天我们制定制度的基础不是你方的疑,而是既有疑,也有信,并且我们今天要关注的是,制度的目的是什么?是为了我们多多益善的尽可能的疑吗?还是说我们尽可能的不疑,扫除疑虑呢?反方二辩:那么请问,完全的信任为什么还有担心呢?正方二辩:我们对员工的信任并不等同于完全放心,我今天遵守了一次交通规则等同于我一辈子遵守交通规则了吗?我今天做了一件好事等同于一辈子做好事吗?反方二辩:你不相信一个人会一辈子做好事,不犯错误,这不是“疑”吗?正方二辩:我们制定了这么多的规章制度、内控制度,不就是为了扫除”“疑”吗?既然扫除了“疑”,为什么还要怀疑呢?2、正方二辩选择反方三辩正方二辩:请问:对方三辩,现在公司都与关键岗位的员工签订了“保密协议”,那么请问,签订保密协议前企业是否敢让员工工作在公司的关键岗位?反方三辩:不能一概而论,应该视情况决定正方二辩好,对方辩友,可见你也知道了,今天签保密协议之后他取得了企业的信任,企业才可以用他,对不对?反方三辩不对,即时签订了保密协议,我还是对他产生怀疑。
如果完全信任,我就根本没必要与他签保密协议,这些机制体现的是,把主观的疑客观的具体化,不要具体化你就说它不怀疑嘛?正方二辩对方辩友,今天的保密协定是在向我们向“不疑”的方向提倡,还是在向“要疑”的方向提倡?反方三辩当然是向“要疑”的方向提倡,不管是保密协定也好,公司的稽查制度也好,背后的出发点是什么?都是因为我们对人的本性有了客观的了解,因为累积的用人经验告诉我们人性可疑。
正方二辩:那照你的意思,我们看一个人,首先就认为他是一个坏人喽?反方二辩:不是说每一个人都是坏人,可是主观的判断有时候会判断错误。
反方二辩陈词第一篇:反方二辩陈词反方二辩陈词谢谢主席!尊敬的评委,对方辩友,各位同学:大家好!通过刚才我方一辩的陈词,相信大家已经对我方观点有所了解,下面就由我对我方观点在理论和事实方面进行补充。
首先,从哆啦A梦的角度来讲,它应掌握好帮助的“度”。
在哲学上,度是保持事物的稳定性的数量界限,超出度的范围,一物就会转化为他物,度的哲学范畴告诉我们,在认识和处理问题是要掌握适度的原则。
而且我们的祖先喜欢并擅长的思维方式和处世为人的态度也是在双方中寻求一个恰到好处的度。
这让人不由自主的联想到了走钢丝:主旨是保持平衡的状态,稳住不致掉下来;不偏不倚正是所需的“度”。
而事实上,哆啦A梦显然并没有掌握好它帮大雄的“度”,并且只要大雄拿出铜锣烧时,哆啦A梦总是有求必应的。
作为一名益友,它在任何时候都不能丧失自己为人处事的原则,并且应学会适当的帮助大雄。
其次,从大雄的角度来讲,大雄生性懒惰,做事只有三分钟热情;不肯读书,上课不专心,总是睡觉及做白日梦, 哆啦A梦应该懂得如何去帮。
作为一个真正的益友,哆啦A梦所作的应该是劝大雄好好学习,改正不好的习惯,而不是一次又一次的拿出记忆面包、满分笔、任意门等工具来帮助他,也正是由于这种毫无原则的帮助对大雄产出了不良的影响,首先使大雄逐渐形成了依赖型人格,变成了一个依靠他人的人,不能够自己去解决问题。
其次使大雄的欲望泛滥。
当欲望达到无限大的时候,人也会丧失为人处世的基本原则。
最后,哆啦A梦在无形中也限制了大雄的人际交往圈,减少了他与其他朋友的互动。
有句话说:靠山山会倒,靠人人会跑,靠人不如靠己,只有自己最可靠。
看来,大雄不应该如此依赖哆啦A梦,他应学着靠自己。
再言之,一名益友应该让朋友懂得自我实现价值。
哆啦A梦通过工具帮助大雄可以说是投机取巧,但是大雄对这种方式却乐此不疲。
此种方式建立在对他人不公平的基础上,例如满分笔即使达到了他的目的,也失去了学习的意义。
难道我们能把自己的快乐和成功建立在别人的痛苦之上吗?我想大家都懂的。
反方二辩:成功不是上苍的赐予,不是好运的降临,更不是什么机遇的结果。
人生的成功,在于每个人心中坚定的目标,在于每个人不畏艰险、克服困难的毅力,更在于每个人不达目的誓不罢休的决心。
它是汗水和坚强的表现,它是脚踏实地求真务实的结果。
放眼世界,哪一位成功者的背后没有辛勤的汗水,哪一次的成功不饱含着艰苦的付出?当我们在人生中期待…机遇‟降临的时候,你是否想到过爱迪生发明灯泡过程的复杂和艰难?他曾经每天工作18小时,用了无数试验材料,尝试了上千次的失败。
对方一辩在开题中便说:“机遇是对人有利的时机、境遇和机会”。
也就是说,成功在于有利的时机、境遇和机会。
对方二辩又说:“在所有因素中能起决定性的因素就是关键”。
也就是说成功的决定性因素就是有利的时机、境遇和机会。
既然机遇在成功中起决定性因素,那就是说有利的时机、境遇和机会对成功起决定性作用。
由以上对方发言可以看出,对方把机遇的出现与机遇出现的前提分割开来。
完全没有领悟我方一辩的真正意思,我们承认机遇的存在,但它并不是成功的决定因素。
机遇是什么,机遇其实就是成功一霎那间所具备的所有有利因素,成功的出现不是由它来决定的,它只是成功的一个伴生物,它的出现是由在它之前所有的付出与努力来决定的。
革命的成功不是因为成功那一刻的有利因素决定的,而是几十年的艰苦斗争决定了这些有利因素的出现,成功与否,在于它的奋斗过程,而不能把它的伴生因素当做决定它的因素。
机遇不是空穴来风,它是创造的,在对方二辩中我们也看到,他们承认机遇在于创造,而不是守株待兔,那就说明,真正决定成功的是创造机遇的过程,而不是好运气或好命运带来的机遇。
航天飞机的研制成功是人类一大进步,伴随发射成功的机遇有发射那天适合的风力、天气、技术、安全等。
是它们决定了航天飞机的研制成功吗?不是!因为这些机遇全部都是通过科技人员几十年来孜孜不倦的努力而决定的,是通过天文、地理、工程等各方面科研人员努力选择与创造的。
所以说成功不是由伴随成功的有利因素决定的,更不是凭上苍赐予的好运气决定,而是成功出现之前的所有付出及努力过程所决定。
Debate一辩:First Debater二辩:Second Debater对方辩友:my fellow debaters正方:the Proposition 反方:the Opposition1. How to agree strongly with an opinion 完全同意I couldn't agree more! / I can't argue with that.I don't think anyone would disagree.I take your point. / I share your view on that.I'd go along with you there.That's absolutely true!/ That's just how I see it.Absolutely! You got it!2. How to half agree with an opinion 部分同意Yes, perhaps./Well, yes.Yes, in a way. / PossiblyYes, I agree up to a point.Well, you've got a point there..I guess you could be right.Yes, I suppose so. /That's worth thinking about.3. How to disagree politely with an opinion 有礼貌的否决I am not sure really./ I can’t possibly agree with you.Do you really think so /Well, it depends.I'm afraid I have a different opinion.I'm afraid I don't share your opinion.I see your point, but I can't really agree with you.I find that hard to swallow. 对这一点我难以相信。
英语辩论常用术语及句式一辩:FIRST DEBATER二辩:SECOND DEBATER对方辩友,my fellow debatersfirst\second affirmative(正方)negative(反方)topic:辩题开始的陈词,Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....后来的部分就和一般的议论问差不多了。
然后加点题外话:陈述的时候一定要自信,把握好时间,如果到后来时间到,你却没陈述完的时候也要保持自信,微笑,不管他们,把话说完,所以陈述部分的最后几句一定要背熟练。
别忘了说THANK YOU。
如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑,进行假设:according to your logic反对object to观点opinion总结summary辩论常用短语荟萃1. stating an opinion 陈述观点a. in my opinion…我的意见是……b. personally I think……我个人认为……c. I believe that……我相信……d. I think that……我觉得……e. the point is that……关键是……, 要点是.....f. if you ask me……如果你问我……g. I’d like to say this:……我会这样说……h. I’d like to point out that 我想指出的是……i. speaking for myself 站在自己的立场上说……j. as far as I’m concerned,…就我而言,……k. in my experience…根据我的经验……2. challenging an opinion 质疑某种观点a. that can’t be true 那不可能是真的。
b. but what about…?但关于……方面呢?3. clarifying a point 阐述观点a.what I said was…我刚才说的是……b.c. b. what I mean to say was…我的意思是说……d.e. c. let me repeat what I said. 让我重复我刚才所说的。
反方二辩陈词模板一、开场嘿,大家好呀!今天站在这儿当反方二辩,我可得好好跟正方掰扯掰扯。
二、论点阐述1. 正方可能会说他们的观点多么多么好,但是我们反方看到的可不一样。
就像他们说这个事儿能带来好多好处,可是他们忽略了其中隐藏的问题。
比如说,他们觉得某种新政策能让大家都开心,但是实际上呢,这个政策可能会让一部分人利益受损。
那些本来过得好好的小商户,可能因为这个政策要多交好多钱,这可不是小事儿呀。
2. 再看另一个方面,正方觉得只要按照他们的想法做,一切都会很顺利。
可他们没有考虑到实际操作中的困难。
这就好比是建房子,光有一个好看的设计图可不行,还得考虑有没有足够的材料,工人会不会做呀。
在这个事儿上也是一样的,他们的想法可能理论上很棒,但是在实际生活中,各种资源不足、人们的观念跟不上等等问题,都会让这个想法难以实现。
3. 还有哦,正方一直在强调长远的利益,说以后肯定会好的。
但是我们反方觉得当下的情况也很重要啊。
如果当下大家都过得很辛苦,为了那个不知道什么时候才能到来的长远利益而牺牲现在,这不是很不合理吗?就像我们现在饿了,你不能说为了以后能吃大餐,现在就饿着啥也不吃吧。
三、反驳正方可能的观点正方要是说他们的方案成本低,我们就可以说,这个成本低只是表面的,实际上还有很多隐性成本没算进去呢。
比如说人力成本,可能在他们的计算里,人力就是几个数字,但是实际上,这些人力投入背后是一个个家庭的付出,这要是算进去,成本可就不低了。
正方要是提到这个方案能提高效率,我们就可以说,效率是提高了,但是质量呢?为了效率牺牲质量,最后得到的结果可能是一堆没用的东西,这可不行呀。
四、结尾所以啊,大家可不能只听正方的一面之词,我们反方看到的这些问题都是实实在在存在的。
希望大家能重新思考这个问题,谢谢大家啦!。
应不应该废除死刑英语反方辩论赛辩词一辩、二辩、三辩、四辩发言稿一辩:Honorable judges, fellow debaters and audience members, I strongly believe that the death penalty should not be abolished. My reasons for this are as follows.Firstly, the death penalty serves as a deterrent to potential criminals. Knowing that the ultimate punishment awaits them if they commit a heinous crime can act as a powerful deterrent to those who might otherwise be inclined to engage in criminal activity.Secondly, the death penalty provides a sense of closure and justice for victims and their families. The families of victims are often devastated by the loss of their loved ones and the death penalty can provide them with a sense of retribution and closure.Lastly, the death penalty is reserved for the most heinous crimes, such as murder, terrorism, and treason. These crimes are so heinous that they deserve the ultimate punishment.In conclusion, the death penalty serves as a deterrent, provides closure and justice for victims and their families, and is reserved for the most heinous crimes. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the deathpenalty should not be abolished.二辩:Honorable judges, fellow debaters and audience members, I disagree with my opponent's argument that the death penalty should not be abolished. Here are my reasons.Firstly, the death penalty is an irreversible punishment. If a person is wrongly convicted and executed, there is no way to undo the damage that has been done. This has happened in the past, and it is a risk that we cannot afford to take.Secondly, the death penalty is often used disproportionately against marginalized communities. Studies have shown that people of color and those from low-income backgrounds are more likely to be sentenced to death than their counterparts. This is a clear example of systemic racism and injustice.Lastly, the death penalty is not an effective deterrent. Studies have shown that the threat of the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing crimes. In fact, the countries that have abolished the death penalty have not seen a rise in crime rates.In conclusion, the death penalty is an irreversible punishment, often used disproportionately against marginalized communities, and is not an effective deterrent. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the death penalty should be abolished.三辩:Honorable judges, fellow debaters and audience members, I am here to support my teammate's argument that the death penalty should be abolished. Here are my additional reasons.Firstly, the death penalty is expensive. The cost of a death penalty trial is much higher than that of a non-death penalty trial. The appeals process is also much longer, which adds to the cost. This money could be better spent on other areas, such as education and healthcare. Secondly, the death penalty is inhumane. It is a cruel and unusual punishment that violates the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The use of lethal injection has been shown to cause excruciating pain, and there have been cases where the execution has gone wrong, causing even more suffering.Lastly, the death penalty does not allow for rehabilitation. When a person is sentenced to death, there is no opportunity for them to be rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. This goes against the idea of justice as a means of reforming individuals and preventing future crimes.In conclusion, the death penalty is expensive, inhumane, and does not allow for rehabilitation. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the death penalty should be abolished.四辩:Honorable judges, fellow debaters and audience members, I am here to refute the arguments made by the opposition and to reiterate why the death penalty should be abolished.Firstly, my opponents argue that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. However, studies have shown that this is not the case. In fact, the death penalty may actually increase crime rates by desensitizing people to violence and causing a culture of revenge. Secondly, my opponents argue that the death penalty provides closure for victims and their families. However, this is not always the case. The appeals process can drag on for years, causing even more trauma for the families of victims. Furthermore, closure is a subjective concept and cannot be achieved through the taking of another life. Lastly, my opponents argue that the death penalty is reserved for the most heinous crimes. However, this is not always the case. There have been cases where people have been sentenced to death for crimes that they did not commit, or where the punishment does not fit the crime.In conclusion, the death penalty is not a deterrent, does not provide closure for victims and their families, and is not always reserved for the most heinous crimes. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the death penalty should be abolished.。
一辩:FIRST DEBATER二辩:SECOND DEBATER对方辩友,my fellow debaters开始的陈词,Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....后来的部分就和一般的议论问差不多了。
然后加点题外话:陈述的时候一定要自信,把握好时间,如果到后来时间到,你却没陈述完的时候也要保持自信,微笑,不管他们,把话说完,所以陈述部分的最后几句一定要背熟练。
别忘了说THANK YOU。
如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑,进行假设:according to your logic反方object观点opinion总结summaryHow to agree strongly with an opinion 表示完全同意I couldn't agree more! I'm of the same opinion.I don't think anyone would disagree.I can't argue with that. I'm sure you are right.I take your point. I'd go along with you there.I share your view on that. I quite agree with you.I'm with you on that. I'm with you there.That's just what I was thinking. That's absolutely true!That's a good point. That's just how I see it.That's exactly my opinion. Absolutely!You got it! That is true.How to disagree politely with an opinion 进行有礼貌的否决I am not sure really. I can’t possibly agree with you.Do you really think so? Well, it depends.I'm not so certain. Well, I'm not so sure about that.No, I don't think so really.I’m afraid i disagree.i'm afraid i have a different opinion.i'm afraid i don't share your opinion.i see your point, but i can't really agree with you.I don’t think so.that’s not (entirely)true.i find that hard to swallow.all right,but don’t you think…?i don't think you've got your facts straight.that was not the case. that's not how i see it.Don't be too sure. Don't speak too soon.I'll believe it when i see it. you know it isn't true.征求他人观点或意见的用语I would be glad to hear your opinion of …well…what do you think(about…)?How do you see it?Do(don’t)you agree?What’s your view on the matter?Are you of the same opinion as I? Let’s have your opinion.I was wondering where you stood on the question of …Do you think that…?就对方阐述的观点进行总结时的用语As you said…But didn’t you say that…?If I understood you correctly, you said that…9. challenging an opinionThat can’t be trueBut what about…?就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语what I said was…what I mean to say was…let me repeat what I said...let me rephrase what I said...That’s all I want to say.Do you agree? I’m sure you agree.引入自己的新观点或看法的用语Another point is that …Another way of looking at it is …I forgot to say / tell you that…in my opinion…Personally I think…I believe that…I think that…My (the) point is that…if you ask me... I’d like to say this…I’d like to point out thatSpeaking for myself ... As far as I’m concerned,...常用句型1…… Can you believe ……?2.If I want you to choose from … and … , which will you join in?3.If you ……, can you……? I don’t think so.4.To my defense...5.My dear friend give me a clear answear please now.亲爱的朋友,请现在就给我一个清楚的解释.6.I guess what you said just now is too far from our topic to catch it ,we have no interest in it.我想你刚才所说的离我们的话题太远了,我们对那不感兴趣.8.If you keep on such stupid type like this,nobody will believe the simple lies that you fed.如果你仍然坚持如此愚蠢的观点,没有人会相信你所说的谎言.9.your word made me think of such a thing:though the stars shinning in the sky,tell me why do you know how they can fall above,tell me why.你的话让我想起了这样一件事:天上的星星在闪烁,告诉我你怎么会知道它能掉下里来呢,告诉我为什么!Everything has two sides 每件事情都有两面Benefits are more than disadvantage. 利大于弊Positive/Negative more than impact/reports积极/消极作用/报道Decide(强调)Existence means truth.存在即是真理。
请问对方二辩,整容兴起于娱乐圈,但是却在广大青少年中泛滥,这种思想的蔓延会不会使青少年
更多的流于外表而忽视自身内在品质的培养呢?
I would like to ask the second affirmative speaker a question. Although doing the plastic surgery is very popular in the entertainment industry, it gains popularity among the vast majority of teenagers. Will this have some negative effect on the cultivation of inner quality if teenagers put more emphasis on their apperance?
反方二辩:请问对方三辩,我们看到,因整容失败造成的无数悲剧,他们怀着美丽的梦想却不得不
承受身体和心灵的双重打击,面对这些惨剧我们还能视若无睹吗?
I’d like to ask the third debater of the positive side a question. We see a lot of tragedies caused by doing plastic surgery. They cherish a hope but have to endure the double attack for both body and heart. Can we be indifferent when confronted with such tragedies?
反方二辩:我们看到在众多的整容人群中,这一部分人毕竟是少数,他们整容无可厚非,但大多数
人是为了更美而整容,这样就不应该了。
We noticed that those who are disfigured due to inheritable disabilities or accident are in the the low minority. It is unblamable for them to do cosmetic surgery, but it is not reasonable for those pursuing a more beautiful appearance to choose to do plastic surgery.反方二辩:那我可真是不幸,但不是所有人都像我一样不幸。
更多的人容貌健康,只是为了追求身体某个部位的完美而去整容,这才是不值得的。
我想问对方辩友,您去整容,就没有考虑到父母家人的感受么?父母想要原装的孩子,孩子想要真实的家长。
How unlucky I am! But not all persons in the world are as unlucky as me. Those who have a pretty look do the plastic surgery just for pursuing the perfection of his or her parts of the body. This is not worthy of being done. I would like to ask the fellow debaters a question. Wouldn’t you think about your parents’ feeling if you choose to do a plastic surgery? Parents want an original children while children want the real parents.
正方二辩:请问对方三辩,爱美之心人皆有之,我们想让自己变的更美,这有什么错吗?
反方三辩:俗话说,人靠衣装马靠鞍,三分长相七分穿。
使自己变美的方法有很多种,我们可以通过衣着、化妆品、首饰来弥补不足,为什么一定要铤而走险选择整容呢?
正方三辩:欢迎来到 21 世纪。
人的思想和观念正在进步,难道只是进步在年轻一代吗?
我们可以看到,很多年纪比较大的人为了抵抗衰老,纷纷选择去医院美容院整容,这是无可厚
非的。
反方三辩:但是正如我们之前提到的,身体发肤,受之父母,这是古人的古训。
父母给予我们身体,给予我们生命,让我们得以活在这个世上。
我们不应该对父母给予我们的一切保持尊敬和感谢吗?。