Measurements of V_{cb} and V_{ub} at BABAR
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:66.34 KB
- 文档页数:4
a rXiv:h ep-e x /991136v124Nov1999New measurement of the rare decay φ→η′γwith CMD-2R.R.Akhmetshin ∗,E.V.Anashkin ∗,M.Arpagaus ∗,V.M.Aulchenko ∗†,V.Sh.Banzarov ∗,L.M.Barkov ∗†,N.S.Bashtovoy ∗,A.E.Bondar ∗†,D.V.Bondarev ∗,A.V.Bragin ∗,D.V.Chernyak ∗,S.I.Eidelman ∗†,G.V.Fedotovitch ∗†,N.I.Gabyshev ∗,A.A.Grebeniuk ∗,D.N.Grigoriev ∗,V.W.Hughes ‡,P.M.Ivanov ∗,S.V.Karpov ∗,V.F.Kazanin ∗†,B.I.Khazin ∗,I.A.Koop ∗,M.S.Korostelev ∗,P.P.Krokovny ∗†,L.M.Kurdadze ∗†,A.S.Kuzmin ∗†,I.B.Logashenko ∗,P.A.Lukin ∗,A.P.Lysenko ∗,K.Yu.Mikhailov ∗†,I.N.Nesterenko ∗,V.S.Okhapkin ∗,A.V.Otboev ∗,E.A.Perevedentsev ∗†,A.A.Polunin ∗,A.S.Popov ∗†,T.A.Purlatz ∗†,N.I.Root ∗†,A.A.Ruban ∗,N.M.Ryskulov ∗,A.G.Shamov ∗,Yu.M.Shatunov ∗,A.I.Shekhtman ∗,B.A.Shwartz ∗†,A.L.Sibidanov ∗†,V.A.Sidorov ∗,A.N.Skrinsky ∗,V.P.Smakhtin ∗,I.G.Snopkov ∗,E.P.Solodov ∗†,P.Yu.Stepanov ∗,A.I.Sukhanov ∗,J.A.Thompson §,V.M.Titov ∗,A.A.Valishev ∗,Yu.V.Yudin ∗,S.G.Zverev ∗February 7,2008AbstractA new measurement of the rare decayφ→η′γperformed withthe CMD-2detector at Novosibirsk is described.Of the data samplecorresponding to the integrated luminosity of14.5pb−1,twenty oneevents have been selected in the modeη′→π+π−η,η→γγ.Thefollowing branching ratio was obtained:±1.1)·10−5.B(φ→η′γ)=(8.2+2.1−1.91IntroductionRadiative decays of vector mesons have traditionally been a good labora-tory for various tests of the quark model and SU(3)symmetry[1].A recent discovery of theφ→η′γdecay by the CMD-2group[2]has been the last link in the otherwise complete picture of radiative magnetic dipole transi-tions between light vector and pseudoscalar mesons.This observation was later confirmed by the SND group[3].Both experiments suffered from a low number of observed events,resulting in large uncertainties in the determined branching ratio and making comparison to theory difficult.In this paper we report on the improved measurement of the rate of the φ→η′γdecay based upon the total data sample accumulated with CMD-2 in theφ-meson energy range.It includes3.1pb−1of data collected in1992–1996in ourfirst measurement which used only photons observed in the CsI barrel calorimeter,and about11.4pb−1collected in1997–1998.In addition,this analysis uses photons detected in either the CsI barrel or the BGO endcap calorimeters for both data samples providing better detection efficiency than before.The general purpose detector CMD-2operating at the high luminosity e+e−collider VEPP-2M in Novosibirsk has been described in detail elsewhere [4,5].It consists of a drift chamber and proportional Z-chamber used for trigger,both inside a thin(0.4X0)superconducting solenoid with afield of 1T.The barrel calorimeter placed outside the solenoid consists of892CsI crystals of6×6×15cm3size and covers polar angles from46◦to132◦.The energy resolution for photons is about9%in the energy range from50to600 MeV.The end-cap calorimeter placed inside the solenoid consists of680BGO crystals of2.5×2.5×15cm3size and covers forward-backward polar angles2from16◦to49◦and from131◦to164◦.The energy and angular resolution are equal toσE/E=4.6%/ E(GeV)radians respectively.The luminosity was determined from the detected e+e−→e+e−events[ 6].2Decay kinematics and selection criteriaSinceφ→η′γis a two-body decay andη′is a narrow state,the momen-tum of the recoil photon isfixed and approximately equals60MeV.To study this decay we searched for the decay chainη′→π+π−η,η→γγ. The photons are ordered by decreasing energy(ω1>ω2>ω3).In these events the softest photon must be a monochromatic recoil photon with the energyω3≈60MeV at theφmeson peak,while the energies of the harder ones range from170to440MeV.The invariant mass of the two harder photons M12=Mη.The main source of background for this study is the decay modeφ→ηγgiving the samefinal state with two charged pions and three photons via the decay chainη→π+π−π0,π0→γγ.Here the hardest photon is monochromatic withω1=363MeV and the invariant mass of two oth-ers is M23=Mπ0.This decay can be used as a monitoring process and the branching ratio B(φ→η′γ)will be calculated relative to B(φ→ηγ). Due to similar kinematics and detection efficiency dependence on detector parameters some systematic errors will cancel in such a ratio.Events with two tracks and three photons were selected using the follow-ing criteria:•One vertex is found in the event•Two tracks with opposite charges are reconstructed from this vertex and there are no other tracks•The angles of both tracks with respect to the beam are limited by 40◦<θ<140◦to match the optimal drift chamber coverage•The number of photons detected in the CsI and BGO calorimeters is three.The cluster in the calorimeter is accepted as a photon when it does not match any charged track and its energy is more than30MeV in the CsI calorimeter or more than40MeV in the BGO calorimeter.3•The distance from each track to the beam R min<0.2cm•The distance from the vertex to the interaction point along the beam direction|Z vert|<10cm•The space angle between the tracks∆ψ<143◦•The angle between the tracks in the R-ϕplane∆ϕ<172◦•The total energy of the charged particles(assuming that both particles are charged pions)επ+π−<520MeV.The events thus selected were subject to the kinematical reconstruction assuming energy-momentum conservation.Events with good quality of the reconstruction were selected by the following criteria:•χ2/d.f.<3•The ratio of the photon energy measured in the calorimeterωcal to that from the constrainedfitωisωcal/ω<1.5•ω3>10MeV3AnalysisEvents surviving after all above criteria mostly come from the process φ→ηγ,η→π+π−π0and e+e−→ωπ0→π+π−π0π0,as illustrated by Fig.1 showing the scatter plot of the invariant mass M23versus the hardest photon energyω1.The data are shown in Fig.1d.The region around M23=135 MeV andω1=363MeV is densely populated withφ→ηγ,η→π+π−π0 events.Simulated events of this process are presented in Fig.1a.To deter-mine the number ofφ→ηγevents we count the number of events inside the ellipse-like region:(ω1+0.45·(M23−mπ0)−ωηγ)2<1.60MeVFor our data this number is Nηγ=7357.Determination of the number ofηγevents for simulation gives the detection efficiencyεηγ=(15.5±0.3)%.4ωM 23ωM 23ω1M 23ω1M 23Figure 1:Invariant mass of two soft photons M 23vs hardest photon energy ω1.a)—simulation of φ→ηγ,η→π+π−π0;b)—simulation of e +e −→ωπ0→π+π−π0π0at the φ-meson energy;c)—simulation of φ→η′γ,η′→π+π−η,η→γγ;d)—experimental data.Figure 1b presents the simulation of e +e −→ωπ0→π+π−π0π0,where a densely populated region is also observed at large values of ωparison of these distributions with that for the data (Fig.1d)confirms that the dominant contribution to selected events comes from these two processes.The same distribution for the simulation of the process under study is shown in Fig.1c.To search for the rare decay φ→η′γwe need to suppress the events from φ→ηγand ωπ0→π+π−π0π0.To this end a cut on the energy of the hardest photon is applied:ω1<350MeV.5Figure2:The hardest photon energyω1for a)—simulation ofφ→ηγ,η→π+π−π0;b)—simulation of e+e−→ωπ0→π+π−π0π0at theφ-meson energy;c)—simulation ofφ→η′γ,η′→π+π−η,η→γγ.Theω1distributions for the simulation ofφ→η′γand background processes are shown in Fig.2.Although this cut causes a decrease of efficiency for theφ→η′γdecay (see Fig.2c),the suppression of the background processes is rather good.One more cut suppressing the background from theφ→K S K L and φ→π+π−π0decays is:επ+π−<420MeV.After all the cuts the scatter plot of the invariant masses for two hardest pho-tons M12versus the weakest photon energyω3was studied.Figure3presents the data(black triangles)together with simulation ofφ→η′γ(points).The simulation points show the region of the plot which should be populated by63M 12Figure 3:Invariant mass of two hard photons M 12vs softest photon energy ω3.Points present the simulation of φ→η′γ,η′→π+π−η,η→γγ,triangles —data after all the selections.the events of φ→η′γand experimental points are densely covering this re-gion.The lower part of the Figure contains obvious background events which can be suppressed by imposing the additional cut M 12>515MeV.To determine the number of events the one-dimensional distribution of ω3+M 12−M η(projection of the plot in Fig.3to the axis perpendicular to the correlation line)was studied.Such projection is shown in Fig.4c for the data.The same projection for 10000simulated events of φ→η′γ,η′→π+π−η,η→γγis shown in Fig.4b,and the fit of this distribution fixes the signal shape and gives the detection efficiency εη′γ=(9.1±0.3)%.The background distribution in this parameter determined from the data before applying the last two cuts (ω1<350MeV and επ+π−<420MeV)is shown in7Fig.4a.Thefit of this distributionfixes the background shape.Finally,the data werefit using the background shapefixed from Fig.4a together with that of the signal from simulation in Fig.4b.The result of thefit is Nη′γ=21.0+5.5−4.9.Figure4:Distribution inω3+M12−Mηtogether with thefit function(dashed line):a)—background fromφ→ηγ,η→π+π−π0events;b)—simulation ofφ→η′γ,η′→π+π−η,η→γγ;c)—data.Using the number of events from thefit,one can calculate the relative branching ratio:B(φ→η′γ)Nηγ·B(η→π+π−π0)B(η→γγ)·εηγwith previous measurements[7]and thus giving confidence in the analysis presented here.In the above calculation of the relative branching ratio common system-atic errors such as luminosity determination cancel exactly,while others such as detector inefficiency and evaluation of radiative corrections cancel approx-imately.Finally,using the value of B(φ→ηγ)=(1.26±0.06)%from[7],one obtains:±1.1)·10−5.B(φ→η′γ)=(8.2+2.1−1.9The last error is our estimate of the systematic uncertainty.The sources of systematic errors are the following:•Uncertainties in the ratioεηγas well as with the result of the SND group[3]±1.0)·10−5(6.7+3.4−2.9and is more precise.Within experimental accuracy it is also consistent with the preliminary result of CMD-2based on other decay modes of theηmeson (η→π+π−π0,π+π−γ)with four charged pions and two or more photons in thefinal state[6]:(5.8±1.8±1.5)·10−5.Analysis of the available data sample of the producedφmesons by both CMD-2and SND and full use of other decay modes of theη′andηmesons will further improve the statistical error.Much larger increase can be expected from the DAΦNEφ-factory where one plans to accumulate the number ofφmesons by at least two orders of magnitude higher than ours.Let us briefly discuss theoretical predictions for the decay under study. Usual methods of the description of radiative decays are based on the non-relativistic quark model[1].Various ways of incorporating effects of SU(3) breaking have been suggested leading to the values of B(φ→η′γ)in the range(5−20)·10−5[9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].The value of the branching ratio studied in our work is also of interest for the problem ofη−η′mixing which has been a subject of intense investigation for a long time[21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].It is sensitive to the structure of theη′wave function or,in other words,to the contribution of various q¯q states as well as the possible admixture of glue in it[29,22,30].According to[29],a branching ratio B(φ→η′γ)<2·10−5would indicate a substantial glue component in theη′,while the expected branching ratio is less than 3·10−6for a pure gluonium.Even smaller values were obtained in[13] assuming a specific model of QCD violation.The revival of interest to the problem of theη′structure and possible contents of glue in it(see[30]and references therein)was partially due to two recent observations by CLEO involving theη′meson:in[31]it was shown that the transition form factor of theη′studied in the two photon processes strongly differs from those for theπ0andηmesons and in[32]the unexpectedly high magnitude of the rate of B→η′K was observed.However, in a recent paper[20]it is claimed that it is impossible to disentangle the effects of the nonet symmetry breaking and those of glue inside theη′.Most of the models mentioned above are able to describe the data reason-ably well in terms of some number of free parameters which,unfortunately,10can not be determined fromfirst principles.An attempt to overcome this drawback was made in[33]where radiative decays of light vector mesons are considered in the approach based on QCD sum rules[34]and the value 15·10−5is obtained for the branching ratio ofφ→η′γdecay.One can summarize that the variety of theoretical approaches to the prob-lem of the description of theφmeson radiative decay toη′γis rather broad and more theoretical insight into the problem is needed.5ConclusionsUsing an almostfive times bigger data sample than in thefirst measure-ment the CMD-2group confirmed the observation of the rare radiative decay φ→η′γ.The measured branching ratio is:±1.1)·10−5.B(φ→η′γ)=(8.2+2.1−1.9Its value is consistent with most of the theoretical predictions based on the quark model and assuming a standard quark structure of theη′.It rules out exotic models suggesting a high glue admixture[29]or strong QCD violation[13].Further progress in thisfield can be expected after the dramatic increase of the number of producedφmesons expected at the DAΦNEφ-factory and refinement of theoretical models of radiative decays.6AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful to M.Benayoun and V.N.Ivanchenko for useful discussions.REFERENCES1.P.J.O’Donnell,Rev.Mod.Phys.53(1981)673.2.R.R.Akhmetshin et al.,Phys.Lett.B415(1997)445.3.V.M.Aulchenko et al.,JETP Lett.69(1999)97.4.G.A.Aksenov et al.,Preprint BudkerINP85-118,Novosibirsk,1985.5. E.V.Anashkin et al.,ICFA Instrumentation Bulletin5(1988)18.6.R.R.Akhmetshin et al.,Preprint BudkerINP99-11,Novosibirsk,1999.117. C.Caso et al.,Eur.Phys.J.C3(1998)1.8.R.R.Akhmetshin et al.,Phys.Lett.B460(1999)242.9. D.A.Geffen and W.Wilson,Phys.Rev.Lett.44(1980)370.10.T.Ohshima,Phys.Rev.D22(1980)707.11.V.N.Ivanchenko,Proc.of the Workshop on Physics and Detectors forDAΦNE’95,Frascati,April1995,p.559.12.A.Bramon,A.Grau and G.Pancheri,Phys.Lett.B344(1995)240.13.M.Benayoun et al.,Z.Phys.C65(1995)399.14.M.Benayoun,S.I.Eidelman and V.N.Ivanchenko,Z.Phys.C72(1996)221.15.P.Ball,J.-M.Fr`e re and M.Tytgat,Phys.Lett.B365(1996)367.16.M.Hashimoto,Phys.Rev.D54(1996)5611.17.P.Ko,J.Lee and H.S.Song,Phys.Lett.B366(1996)287.18.T.Feldmann,P.Kroll and B.Stech,Phys.Lett.B449(1999)339.19.R.Escribano and J.-M.Fr`e re,Phys.Lett.B459(1999)288.20.M.Benayoun et al.,Phys.Rev.D59(1999)114027.21.V.A.Novikov et al.,Phys.Lett.B86(1979)347.22.J.L.Rosner,Phys.Rev.D27(1983)1101.23.F.J.Gilman and R.Kauffman,Phys.Rev.D36(1987)2761.24.R.Akhoury and J.-M.Fr`e re,Phys.Lett.B220(1989)258.25.M.R.Ahmady,V.Elias and E.Kou,Phys.Rev.D57(1998)7034.26.A.Bramon,R.Escribano and M.D.Scadron,Eur.Phys.J.C7(1999)271.27.T.Feldmann,hep-ph/9907491,1999.28.B.Bagchi et al.,Phys.Rev.D60(1999)074002.29.N.G.Deshpande and G.Eilam,Phys.Rev.D25(1982)270.30.E.Kou,hep-ph/9908214,1999.31.J.Gronberg et al.,Phys.Rev.D57(1998)33.32.B.H.Behrens et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.80(1998)3710.33.Shin-Lin Zhu,W.-Y.P.Hwang and Ze-sen Yang,Phys.Lett.B420(1998)8.34.M.A.Shifman, A.I.Vainshtein and V.I.Zakharov,Nucl.Phys.B147(1979)385.12。
医学物理实验_山东大学中国大学mooc课后章节答案期末考试题库2023年1.日常生活中的表面吸附现象有:The surface adsorption phenomena in dailylife are as follows:参考答案:面粉洗葡萄Washing grapes with flour_活性炭过滤水Activated carbonfilter water_水面上的油膜Oil film on water2.杨氏弹性模量E仅决定于材料本身的性质,而与外力ΔF,物体的长度L以及截面积S的大小无关,它是表征固体材料性质的一个重要物理量。
Young's modulus of elasticity e is only determined by the properties of thematerial itself, but has nothing to do with the external force Δ F, the length L of the object and the cross section product S. It is an important physicalquantity to characterize the properties of solid materials.参考答案:正确3.精密度是与“真值”之间的一致程度,是系统误差与随机误差的综合。
Precision is the degree of consistency with "true value", and is the synthesis of systematic error and random error.参考答案:错误4.以下说法正确的是:Which statement below is correct参考答案:在一定的温度下,它的旋光率与入射光波长的平方成反比,且随波长的减少而迅速增大,这现象称为旋光色散。
翻译measurements基本解释●measurements:测量,尺寸●/ˈmeʒəmənts/●n. 测量结果,尺寸变化形式●n. 复数形式:measurements具体用法●名词:o测量结果,尺寸o同义词:dimensions, size, extent, magnitude, scaleo反义词:guess, estimate, approximation, conjecture, speculation o例句:●The measurements of the room were taken to ensure that thenew furniture would fit perfectly without any issues. (房间的尺寸被测量以确保新家具能够完美地放置而没有任何问题。
)●Accurate measurements are crucial in scientific experimentsto ensure the validity and reliability of the results obtained.(在科学实验中,准确的测量对于确保获得结果的有效性和可靠性至关重要。
)●The tailor took precise measurements of the client to createa custom suit that would fit him perfectly. (裁缝精确地测量了客户的尺寸,以制作一套完全合身的定制西装。
)●Engineers rely on precise measurements to design structuresthat can withstand various environmental conditions and loads. (工程师依靠精确的测量来设计能够承受各种环境条件和负载的结构。
)●The architect reviewed the measurements of the site toensure that the building plans were feasible and met all regulatory requirements. (建筑师审查了场地的尺寸,以确保建筑计划是可行的并符合所有法规要求。
MEASURE GAP相关36.331 5.5.2.9 测量间隔配置UE将:1> 如果measGapConfig设置为 ‘setup’,那么:2> 如果已经建⽴测量间隔配置,那么释放该测量间隔配置;2> 根据接收的gapOffset,建⽴ measGapConfig表⽰的测量间隔,即,每⼀个间隔在SFN处开始,并且⼦帧满⾜如下条件:SFN mod T = FLOOR(gapOffset/10);subframe = gapOffset mod 10;其中T= MGRP/10 ,定义在TS 36.133 [16]中;1> 否则:2> 释放该测量间隔配置;36.133 8.1.2.1 UE measurement capability8.1.2.1 UE measurement capabilityIf the UE requires measurement gaps to identify and measure inter-frequency and/or inter-RAT cells, in order for the requirements in the following subsections to apply the E-UTRAN must provide a single measurement gap pattern with constant gap duration for concurrent monitoring of all frequency layers and RATs.During the measurement gaps the UE:- shall not transmit any data- is not expected to tune its receiver on any of the E-UTRAN carrier frequencies of PCell and any SCell.- is not expected to tune its receiver on any of the E-UTRAN carrier frequencies of PCell and PSCell.If the UE supporting dual connectivity is configured with PSCell, during the total interruption time as shown in Figure 8.1.2.1-1, the UE shall not transmit and receive any data in SCG.In the uplink subframe occurring immediately after the measurement gap,- if the following conditions are met then it is up to UE implementation whether or not the UE can transmit data:- all the serving cells belong to E-UTRAN TDD;- if the subframe occurring immediately before the measurement gap is an uplink subframe.- Otherwise the UE shall not transmit any data.In determining the above UE behaviour in the uplink subframe occurring immediately after the measurement gap the UE shall treat a special subframe as an uplink subframe if the special subframe occurs immediately before the measurement gap,Inter-frequency and inter-RAT measurement requirements within this clause rely on the UE being configured with one measurement gap pattern unless the UE has signaled that it is capable of conducting such measurements without gaps. UEs shall only support those measurement gap patterns listed in Table 8.1.2.1-1 that are relevant to its measurement capabilities. Table 8.1.2.1-1: Gap Pattern Configurations supported by the UEGap Pattern Id MeasurementGapLength (MGL, ms)Measurement Gap Repetition Period(MGRP, ms)Minimum available time for inter-frequency and inter-RAT measurements during 480ms period(Tinter1, ms)Measurement Purpose064060Inter-Frequency E-UTRA N FDD and TDD, UTRAN FDD, GERAN, LCR TDD, HRPD, CDMA2000 1x168030Inter-Frequency E-UTRA N FDD and TDD, UTRAN FDD, GERAN, LCR TDD, HRPD, CDMA2000 1x36300/5.5.2.9 测量间隔配置Depending on whether the UE needs transmission/reception gaps to perform the relevant measurements, measurements are classified as gap assisted or non-gap assisted. A non-gap assisted measurement is a measurement on a cell that does not require transmission/reception gaps to allow the measurement to be performed.A gap assisted measurement is a measurement on a cell that does require transmission/reception gaps to allow the measurement to be performed. Gap patterns (as opposed to individual gaps) are configured and activated by RRC.这取决于UE需要发送/接收间隙进⾏相关测量,测量分为间隙辅助或⾮间隙辅助。
a rXiv:h ep-e x /0614v11Ja n26SLAC-PUB-11606B A B A R -CONF-05/131January 2006Measurements of |V cb |and |V ub |at B A B A R Romulus Godang (representing the B A B A R Collaboration)Department of Physics and Astronomy,University of Mississippi-Oxford,University,MS 38677USA Abstract We report on new measurements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements |V cb |and |V ub |with inclusive and exclusive semileptonic B decays,highlighting the recent precision measurements with the B A B A R detector at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy B Factory at SLAC.Contributed to the Proceedings of Particles and Nuclei International Conference,PANIC05,October 24-28,2005,Santa Fe,NM USAStanford Linear Accelerator Center,Stanford University,Stanford,CA 943091IntroductionThe stringent tests of the Standard Model are currently not limited by the measurements of the CP-Violation parameter sin2β[1]but by the measured ratio of the CKM matrix elements|V ub|/|V cb|, which determines the length of the left side of the Unitary Triangle.The semileptonic B meson decays to charm and charmless mesons are the primary tool for measuring the CKM matrix elements|V cb|and|V ub|because of their simple theoretical description at the parton level.Their relatively large decay rates are proportional to|V cb|2or|V ub|2,depend on the quark masses m b and m c,and allow us to probe the impact of strong interactions on the bound quark.The semileptonic B meson decays can also be used to achieve a precision measurement of f00≡B(Υ(4S)→B0B0→D∗+ℓ−B0and D∗+, and corresponds to the relativistic boostγof the D∗+in theB0→D∗+ℓ−where the errors represents the statistical,the systematic,and the uncertainty in A1(1),respectively. 3|V ub|MeasurementsThe inclusive decay rate B→X uℓνis directly proportional to|V ub|2and can be calculated using HQE;however,the extraction of|V ub|is a challenging task due to a large background from B→X cℓνdecays.We have extracted|V ub|using the following techniques:a)the measurement of the lepton spectrum above2.0GeV/c,i.e.near the kinematic endpoint for B→X cℓνdecays[10],resultingin|V ub|=(4.44±0.25+0.42−0.38±0.22)×10−3;b)the measurement of the lepton spectrum combinedwith q2,the momentum transfer squared[11],resulting in|V ub|=(3.95±0.26+0.58−0.42±0.25)×10−3;c)the measurement of the hadron mass distribution below1.7GeV/c2and q2>8GeV2/c4in events tagged by the full reconstruction of a hadronic decay on the second B meson[12],resultingin|V ub|=(4.65±0.34+0.46−0.38±0.23)×10−3.In all of the above measurements,the errors are due toexperimental,shape function,and theoretical uncertainties.We have also measured|V ub|in the exclusive semileptonic B→πℓνdecays based on three different methods:a)in untagged events,in which the neutrino momentum is inferred from the missing momentum,i.e.the four-momentum is inferred from the difference between the four-momentum of the colliding-beam particles and sum of the four-momenta of all detected particles in the event.This measurement is performed separately infive intervals of q2and leads to an independent measurement of the shape of the form factor.The results agree well with predictionsfrom lattice QCD and light-cone sum rules[13],resulting in|V ub|=(3.82±0.14±0.22±0.11+0.88−0.52)×10−3from B→πℓν,where the errors are statistical,systematic,the form factor shape,and the form factor normalization;b)measurement of B0→π−ℓ+νdecays uses events in which the signal B meson recoils against a B meson that has been reconstructed in a semileptonic decayνℓ[14],resulting in|V ub|=(3.3±0.4±0.2+0.8−0.4)×10−3;c)measurements of B0→π−ℓ+νand B+→π0ℓ+νdecays inΥ(4S)→BB data sample will become available from the B Facto-ries[16],PEP-II[17],and KEKB[18].We can expect significant improvements in statistics,in our understanding of the experimental and theoretical uncertainties,leading to higher precision of|V cb| and|V ub|.I would like to thank all members of the B A B A R Collaboration.This work was supported by the U.S.Department of Energy grant DE-FG02-91ER40622.References[1]Particle Data Group,S.Eidelman et al.,Phys.Lett.B592,1(2004);(2005).[2]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.95,042001(2005).[3]M.Voloshin and M.Shifman,Sov.J.Nucl.Phys.41,120(1985);J.Chay,H.Georgi,and B.Grinstein,Phys.Lett.B247,399(1990);I.I.Bigi and N.Uraltsev,Phys.Lett.B280,271(1992).[4]I.I.Bigi,M.Shifman,N.Uraltsev,and A.Vainshtein,Phys.Rev.D56,4017(1997).[5]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.93,011803(2004).[6]P.Gambino and N.Uraltsev,Eur.Phys.J.C34,181(2004);D.Benson,I.I.Bigi,T.Mannel,and N.Uraltsev,Nucl.Phys.B665,367(2003);N.Uraltsev,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A20,2099(2005).[7]I.I.Bigi,M.Shifman,and N.Uraltsev,Annu.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci.47,591(1997).[8]S.Hashimoto,Phys.Rev.D66,014503(2002).[9]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,Phys.Rev.D71,051502(2005).[10]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,hep-ex/0509040,accepted by Phys.Rev.D.[11]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.95,111801(2005).[12]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,hep-ex/0507017(2005).[13]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,Phys.Rev.D72,051102(2005).[14]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,hep-ex/0506064(2005).[15]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,hep-ex/0507085(2005).[16]P.Oddone,UCLA Collider Workshop,eConf C870126,423(1987);UA1Collaboration,C.Albajar et al.,Phys.Lett.B186,247(1987).[17]B A B A R Collaboration,B.Aubert et al.,Nucl.Instr.Methods Phys.Res.,Sect.A479,1(2002).[18]Belle Collaboration,A.Abashian et al.,Nucl.Instr.Methods Phys.Res.,Sect.A479,117(2002).。