CSC research proposal格式参考

Research Proposal1.Applicant’s nameLIU Jia2.Title of proposed research projectMicro Film Creation Art Theory—— Taking original micro film "THE MEANING OF EMOTION" as an example3.Summary of researchIn the condition of promoting the media integration, the creation of micro film and audience psychology are worthy of the hot content of research. In the reseach,I am using data analysis method and the investigation method, selected from the original micro film "THE MEANING OF EMOTION" as the main object of discussion,through the micro film creation in narrative art and technique of expression to influence the audience's aesthetic.4.IntroductionMicro film "THE MEANING OF EMOTION" has been the national college students innovation and entrepreneurship program funded, in many of the predecessors and colleagues to participate in support to complete.5.Objectives and hypotheses to be testedIn the media convergence from the perspective of micro film creation should pay attention to narrative elements and technique of expression, the micro film creation into inspiring positive narrative elements can make the audience's psychological condition in a certain extent to improve a lot.6.Literature reviewOn film studies courses, students are asked to treat as objects of study the same films which they may more commonly experience as entertainment. To explore the role of academic writing in this, an action research project was carried out on a university film studies course using a systemic functional linguistics approach.A taxonomic film analysis was analysed drawing on the work of Halliday and Mathiessen (2004), Martin (1992) and Lemke, (1985, 1990 ), focussing on three aspects: the genre acts performed in the process of analysing film; the conceptual frameworks of film studies knowledge, or ‘thematic formations’ (Lemke, 1993) drawn on and re-constituted in theassignment; the particular ways that language is used to perform these acts and build these thematic formations. For EAP to be relevant to film students, it is proposed that EAP specialists need to engage with these three aspects of film study. This application of SFL in film studies EAP is intended as an illustration of how SFL tools can be used for relevant EAP provision across the HE curriculum.In Britain, film studies came on the agenda in the 1970s, when it served as a terrain for the formulation of a critical understanding of how cinema functioned within the broader context of industrial capitalism and the nexus between that and the reshaping of people's habits and lives. However, during that decade, a different agenda was also at work, which, from the early 1980s, began to receive support from neo-liberal 'free-market' ideologues. Over a period of 30 years, the overall direction of the inquiry into cinema, now firmly sealed into institutional networks, has become such that the critical language of 'film theory' has been hollowed out and the industrial agenda of British national television and cinema wrapped around it. Today, with the opening of film studies departments across Asia, the question is not whether outside Britain the language of film studies will became available for instrumentalization by the forces of an expanding Euro-American capital, but how it will do so. Valentina Vitali argues that the recovery of film from the bureaucratization of its study and its rediscovery as one of the modalities of modernization require both a framework of analysis that is fully conscious of its own historicity and critical role, and a new topography of cinema.In France，Philippe Gauthier have a paper is a comparative study of the impact on French film studies of the emergence of television and digital technologies. The goal of the comparison between what the author calls the ‘television revolution’ –a period in which film theorists became aware of the impact of television on the study of cinema – and the now well-known ‘digital revolution’ is to observe the recurrence of specific phenomena in the history of film studies in France. The author argues that during both the television and digital revolutions there appears to be a desire to compare cinema with other media while at the same time asserting its specificity. The impact of the television and digital revolutions on film studies in France is thus two-fold: (1) the broadening of the discipline's boundaries to include other media and other research methods; (2) the redefinition of cinema based on a singular definition of the medium.In film studies, the Auteur Theory is mainly employed to explore film directors’ signature styles in creating their mastery artifacts. Individual style of adirector in filmmaking is based on his/her preferences; genre, theme, mise-en-scéne, cinematography or even casts line-up. Disciplinary indiscipline characterizes the post-industrial, post-modern, post-disciplinary intellectual environment. The certainties offered by normative theories are lost in a post-disciplinary virtual world that appears to be no longer fully grounded on modernist assumptions or even material reality. It has become common practice to meld many different and sometimes incompatible academic approaches in order to pander to students’ preferences. Contemporary approaches now especially mimic Karl Marx’s phase ‘all that is solid melts into air’, as many un-, ill- and in-disciplined post-disciplinary disciples shield students from knowing about disciplinary epistemologies, disciplinary histories and the paradigmatic evolution of film theories across different periods, contexts and conditions. Keyan G Tomaselli critically examines some of these issues by applying the framework of langue (structure) and parole (accent) to make sense of film studies in a post-disciplinary media world dominated by economic implosion.7.Materials and methodsIn the reseach,I am using data analysis method and the investigation method, selected from the original micro film "THE MEANING OF EMOTION" as the main object of discussion.The research of the conclusion after the analysis of the writing style, and the audience survey response.8.Anticipated outcome and value of the researchAccording to the creation, filming, dissemination and reflection of the micro film, the psychological status of the audience can be improved if the active elements of the film creation can be improved.9.References[1]James P. Donohue. Using systemic functional linguistics in academic writing development: An example from film studies[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,2012,111:.[2]Philippe Gauthier. Recurrent phenomena in French film studies: from television to digital media[J]. New Review of Film and Television Studies,2014,123:.[3]Valentina Vitali. Why study cinema? Serial visions of the culture industry and the future of film studies[J]. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies,2005,62:.[4]Nurul Ezzati Aisya Mohd Zaki,Che Su Mustaffa,Noer Doddy Irmawati. Visualizing Islamic Law and Values in Semerah Padi (1956): P. Ramlee asCinematographic Auteur[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2014,155:.[5]Keyan G Tomaselli. (Un-)Disciplined indiscipline. The langue and parole of film studies in a post-disciplinary world[J]. South African Theatre Journal,2015,282:.。

research proposal 格式
编写研究提案（research proposal）的格式可能会有些变化，具体取决于学科、机构或项目的要求。

以下是一个一般性的研究提案的标准格式，供参考：
1. 标题：
-确定性而简明地概括研究内容。

2. 背景和引言：
-介绍研究问题的背景，阐明研究的重要性。

-提供相关文献综述，说明目前已有的研究和知识空缺。

3. 研究问题或目标：
-明确研究的主要问题或目标。

4. 研究设计/方法：
-描述研究设计，包括数据收集和分析方法。

-讨论实施研究的步骤，以及为什么选择这些方法。

5. 理论框架：
-如果适用，提供支持研究的理论基础。

6. 研究的意义和预期成果：
-阐述研究的理论和实际意义，以及预期的研究成果。

7. 研究计划和时间表：
-列出研究的阶段，包括起止日期。

8. 预算：
-提供研究所需的经费预算，包括任何可能的支出。

9. 参考文献：
-列举所有在研究提案中引用的文献。

10. 附录：
-如果需要，包含支持材料，例如调查问卷、图表、地图等。

请注意，研究提案的具体要求可能会因学科和项目而异。

在准备研究提案时，请仔细阅读和遵循特定机构或项目提供的指南和要求。

Subject: xxx (与你专业相关)Title:Tips: 你的title应该要简单易懂，让别人一看到题目就知道你在research什么Abstract:1.In your abstract, you should first briefly explain what your question is and why it is interesting.You should then explain the results of your analysis.2.You should finally describe the conclusion of your analysis—in other words, what your resultsmean.3.Your abstract5 should be no longer than 200 words.摘要部分，这里你应该要写你为什么要研究这个课题，然后简单叙述你的研究成果/结论Introduction:1.The main goal of your introduction is to motivate your question and introduce your analysis.2.You should therefore provide enough background to make the value of your analysis clear3.You should cite between 5 and 10 papers which are related to your analysis4.You should then explain what your analysis sets out to do. What is your question? What doyou expect to do?5.You may wish to give an initial indication of the results, but this is a stylistic decision在这里你可以引用5-10篇学术文章，但每个老师的喜好有所不同，有的老师会要求整个research proposal的cite不超过20篇，所以introduction里不能有那么多的引用。

Research Proposal一、研究背景随着社会的发展和进步，科学技术得到了快速发展，人们对科学知识的渴望也越来越强烈。

作为一个研究人员，我们需要不断地深入研究各种领域的知识，为社会的发展做出贡献。

本课题选择了XXX为研究对象，主要是因为XXX有着广阔的研究空间，同时具有一定的实际应用价值。

二、研究目的我们的研究旨在探索XXX的XXX特性，并通过对XXX的深入研究，为XXX领域的发展做出贡献。

通过我们的研究，还可以为企业的XXX 提供一定的参考和指导。

三、研究方法为了达到以上研究目的，我们将采用XXX方法进行研究。

我们将通过实地调查、统计分析、专家访谈等方法，收集大量的XXX相关数据，并对这些数据进行深入、系统的分析和研究，从而揭示XXX的内在特性和规律。

四、研究内容1. XXX的定义和特性我们将通过文献综述和实地调查，对XXX的定义和特性进行界定和分析，从而深入探讨XXX的本质属性。

2. XXX的发展现状及问题我们将通过对XXX的发展现状进行调查和分析，发现其中存在的问题和矛盾，为我们进一步的研究提供依据。

3. XXX的发展趋势通过对XXX的发展趋势进行分析和研究，探讨XXX未来的发展方向和发展空间，为XXX领域的进一步研究提供参考。

五、研究意义我们的研究将有以下意义：1. 为XXX领域的发展提供理论指导和参考；2. 为企业的XXX提供决策支持和指导；3. 为相关研究人员提供研究思路和方法。

六、研究预期成果通过我们的研究，我们希望能够得到以下预期成果：1. 对XXX的定义和特性有更深刻、更系统的认识；2. 对XXX的发展现状、问题和趋势进行了深入的分析和探讨；3. 对XXX领域的发展提出了一定的见解和建议。

七、研究进度安排我们的研究将按以下进度安排进行：1. 月份：进行XXX的文献综述和调研；2. 月份：完成对XXX的实地调查和数据收集；3. 月份：进行数据分析和研究；4. 月份：撰写研究报告和论文。

干货ResearchProposal写作方法Research Proposal（简称RP）也就是指研究报告或者开题报告，一般作为论文或者研究开始前的计划和纲要，比如毕业论文开题报告、申请博士的研究计划、国家基金类研究申报报告等。

RP的内容通常为：你打算完成什么（what），为什么你要做这件事（why），以及你打算怎样去完成它（how）。

主要包括标题（Title）、摘要 (Abstract)、引言(Introduction)、文献综述(Literature Review)、方法(Methods)、结果(Result)、讨论(Discussion)七部分。

整体字数看学校要求，一般1500-2000.下面我们详细分析Research Proposal写作方法。

1.标题（Title）简明扼要，内容翔实又吸引人PS：其实和中文论文写作差不多，题目不要泛而空，尽量缩小话题范围，这样内容更有针对性。

题目要能体现你的研究对象和创新性，至少能勾起阅读全文的兴趣！2.摘要（Abstract）300字左右的简要归纳。

它应该包括研究问题，研究的理论基础，假说（如有的话），研究方法以及主要发现。

PS：重中之重，实际就是将RP再浓缩一次。

Title+ Abstract就一锤定生死了，剩下部分基本就是abstract的拓展了。

对于建筑类相关专业，empirical study(案例研究/场地调研/问卷访谈等等)非常重要，如果连实地都没有去过，何来一手的资料，一手的结论呢？此处会涉及到original contribution（原创贡献），你的原创性/你对这一议题的贡献值有多少。

所以摘要的实质也是一种游说/推销，推销你的研究意义所在。

3.引言（Introduction）主要目的是为你的研究问题提供必要的背景。

通常包含以下内容：某描述研究问题/目的；某为你的研究问题提供背景，设定其范围，以体现出它的必要性和重要性；某理论依据，要清楚的指出为什么该研究是值得去做的；某简要描述该研究要解决的主要及次要问题；某明确说明你想要研究的现象；某阐述你的假说或理论（如有的话）；某设定你研究计划的局限或边界，以提供一个清晰的研究重点；某给关键概念下定义（此项为可选）PS:不多说，基本就是介绍一下研究背景，为什么你的研究内容很有意义或必要性。

Title of research:An investigation into the barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianship.Objectives:•To identify key barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianship•To administrate a national electronic survey to health librarians and information specialists in England, Scotland and Wales.Please give a brief justification of your proposed research project:The question this study aims to answer is: What are the barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianship? This question has been given minimal levels of consideration in the professional literature to date and is a question of importance for a number of reasons. There is now a growing literature base that recognises the need for librarians to engage more with research (Powell, Baker et al. 2002; Juznic and Urbanija 2003; Koufogiannakis and Slater 2004; Koufogiannakis and Crumley 2006). Within the current context of health librarianship strategies are neededto engage with this more fully and in order to effectively address the associated issues that relate to improved decision making skills, evidence based practice, and the improvement of patient care. This is particularly pertinent in light of the recent HillReport (Hill 2008, p35) which specifically recommends that “research to measure the impact of the application of best available evidence in decision making should continueto be pursued vigorously and routinely by health librarians, in partnership with researchers’.Much of the work health librarians are involved with is directly linked to evidence based health practice, and evidence based medicine and research forms a substantial aspectof this (Eldredge 2000; Hill 2008). Whilst there is a demand on health professionals to justify and base their practice on robust research based evidence, there is little evidence that health librarians are engaging with this in relation to their own professional practice. Largely, their involvement with evidence based practice is linked directly to health practice rather than the practice of librarianship. The lack of evidence based practice in librarianship jeopardises the credibility of health librarians in their involvement with evidence based health practice and it is widely reported that increased engagement with evidence based librarianship amongst the profession is becoming increasingly important. For health librarians to credibly support evidence based health practice / medicine it is arguable that the profession should be able to demonstrate evidence based practice in relation to its own professional practice (Eldredge 2000; Booth and Brice 2003; Grant 2003). This is particularly relevant since the end purpose of health librarianship is directly linked to the improvement of patient care (Hill 2008). For health librarians totake a truly evidence based approach to their professional practice, increased engagement with research activities is necessary. At present however, there is little evidence that health librarians are engaging with research in relation to their ownprofessional practice (Booth 2002; Booth and Brice 2003). Whilst some small pockets of active engagement exist, largely this remains a specialist interest area rather than something that is taken on board profession-wide (Booth 2002). Reluctance to conduct research in relation to health librarianship (rather than health practice) within the profession is widely documented (Booth 2002; Booth 2003). However, with the exception of a generic study (McNicol and Nankivell 2003) which aimed to survey librarians from all subject disciplines and which had poor coverage of health librarians, the reasons behind this have not as yet been fully investigated.The study by McNicol and Nankivell (2003) identified the LIS research agenda to be poorly organised and lacking in direction. It is expected that in carrying out this study a deeper understanding of the reluctance amongst health librarians to engage in research and other related issues they perceive create barriers to their engagement with research activity will be gained. The study will also aim to investigate what they feel are the priorities for research development to aid this current situation. It is anticipated that from the data collected, a clearer and deeper understanding of the issues can be acquired. This will inform the development of a framework which will provide clarity and direction for the profession. Furthermore, it will make recommendations as to how best research development can be taken forward in the profession based on sound evidence derived from the population to which it concerns. The use of a large scale electronic web based survey method will help to acquire a valid data set which is expected to make a substantial and effective contribution to answering the research question. The results and recommendations will be widely disseminated through a variety of appropriate channels.ReferencesBooth, A. (2002). "Mirage or reality." Health information and libraries journal 19(2): 56-58.Booth, A. (2003). "Bridging the research-practice gap: the role of evidence based librarianship." The New Review of Information and Library Research 9(1): 3-23.Booth, A. and A. Brice (2003). "Clear-cut?: facilitating health librarians to use information research in practice." Health information and libraries journal 20(S1): 45-52.Eldredge, J. D. (2000). "Evidence-based librarianship: an overview." Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88(4): 289-302.Grant, M. L. (2003). "Journal clubs for continued professional development." Health information and libraries journal 20(1): 72-78.Hill, P. (2008). Report of a national review of NHS library services in England: from knowledge to health in the 21st century. Newcastle, Institute of Health and Society.Juznic, P. and J. Urbanija (2003). "Developing research skills in library and information studies." Library Management 274(6/7): 324-331.Koufogiannakis, D. and E. Crumley (2006). "Research in librarianship: issues to consider." Library Hi Tech 24(3): 324-340.Koufogiannakis, D. and L. Slater (2004). "A content analysis of librarianship research." Journal of Information Science 30(3): 227-239.McNicol, S. and C. Nankivell (2003). The LIS research landscape: a review and prognosis, Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals.Powell, R. R., L. M. Baker, et al. (2002). "Library and information science practitioners and research." Library and Information Science Research 24(1): 49-72.Please outline the proposed sample group, including any specific criteria: The sample group will aim to include representation from eight identified areas of health librarianship:Senior strategic health librariansClinical librariansHealth library service managersSenior information strategy managersAcademic health librariansIndependent health librariansResearch librariansAcademicsThe qualifying criteria required for inclusion in the survey will be health librarians and information specialists working in the above context areas, and who hold a professional LIS qualification (ie. degree level or above).Describe how the proposed sample group will be formulated:The study will aim to cover a wide sample group formulated from individuals working in the context areas identified above. Potential participants will be identified from LIS related JISCmail groups, professional directories, university LIS departments, special interest and professional groups, and cascades through senior managers and group Chairs.Indicate clearly what the involvement of the sample group will be in the research process:The involvement of the sample group in the study will extend to the completion of an electronic survey which will be sent via email.Specify how the consent of participants will be obtained. Please include within this a description of any information with which you intend to provide the subjects:Consent will be gained from respondents immediately before participants complete the survey. An invitation email will be sent out to potential participants containing details about the study and a link to the survey. Consent will be obtained from respondents through the inclusion of a statement of consent which will be embedded at the beginning of the survey before the respondent commences with completion of their response. Upon accessing the survey link, respondents will be directed to read the statement of consent and offered the option to consent to their involvement in the study or not. Provided the participant opts to consent to their participation, the survey will then open for them to complete. From the time of sending out the invitation to participate and link to the survey, potential respondents will be given six weeks in which to complete the survey (with a reminder being sent out at three weeks), if they decide to do so after having read the statement of consent.Indicate any potential risks to subjects and how you propose to minimise these:Participation in this survey presents no potential risks to the participants. Participants and their organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for publication.Describe the procedures you intend to follow in order to maintain the anonymity and confidentiality of the subjects:The email addresses from which responses will be sent will be automatically removed by the survey software used (SurveyMonkey). The identity of respondents will therefore not be known to the researchers at the survey return stage. Participants and their organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for publication.RESEARCH CONSENT FORMTitle of studyAn investigation into the barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianshipPlease read and complete this form carefully. If you are willing to participate in this study, ring the appropriate responses and sign and date the declaration at the end. If you do not understand anything and would like more information, please ask.I have had the research satisfactorily explained to me in written form by the researcher. YES / NOI understand that the research will involve:•The completion of an electronic survey on the topic of research development issues in health librarianship.YES / NOI understand that I may withdraw from this study at any time without having to give an explanation.YES / NOI understand that all information about me will be treated in strict confidence and that I will not be named in any written work arising from this studyYES / NOI understand that any data collected will be used solely for research purposes and will be erased on completion of your research.YES / NOI understand that the data will only be discussed within the research teamYES / NOI understand that survey participants and their respective organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for publicationYES / NOI freely give my consent to participate in this research study and have been given a copy of this form for my own information.Signature: ………………………………………………………Name (capital letters)…………………………………………..Date: ……………………………………………………………Contact details: (include address, email and telephone number) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Thank you for your interest in the study.。

个人资料整理，仅供个人学习使用
Research Proposal和摘要的格式要求
如提交的Research Proposal为英文，需要另附200-300字的中文摘要；如提交中文的Research Proposal，则需要提交200-300词的英文摘要。

Research Proposal具体要求如下：①字数要求1000字左右（中文或英文，需与毕业论文所用语言一致）；②内容要求与开题内容一致，在开题报告基础上展开；学术型研究生及全日制教育硕士用英文，翻译硕士用中文，在职研究生（含硕师计划）英汉语均可；③字体要求：汉语用宋体，英语用Tims New roman,日语字体由导师决定，均为5号字体，1.5倍行距；④Research Proposal需提交电子版1份,学院将统一组织对Research Proposal内容查重，查重不合格者（超出20%）推迟开题。

1 / 1。

Research Proposal英语（国际金融1班）200869020227 陈立峰人民币升值对我国对外贸易的影响ⅠTitle of my thesis(Times New Roman 粗体小四号)---论文题目英文标题（Times New Roman 小四号）中文标题（宋体小四号）ⅡSignificance of Study (Times New Roman 粗体小四号)---选题的意义（5spaces）正文（Times New Roman 小四号）改革开放以来，人民币汇率逐渐发展为国民经济的稳健发展与内外均衡的经济变量。

国际金融界一直对我国持续已久的贸易顺差进行指责，近年来，鉴于出口导向型经济取得的巨大成就，中欧及中美双边贸易都呈现贸易顺差继续扩大的现状，人民币升值已经成为必然。

随着世界金融的全球化，一体化发展，我国的经济与国际经济的结合程度越来越高，这样人民币汇率的变动和我国进出口贸易将联系的更加紧密。

ⅢLiterature review(Times New Roman 粗体小四号)---当前国内外研究现状（5spaces）正文（Times New Roman 小四号）改革开放发展至今，我国进出口贸易迅速壮大发展，大体呈现以下的特点。

（1）对外贸易规模不断扩大。

随着我国经济体制改革的深化，特别是对外开放和外贸体制改革步伐的加快，我国出口贸易呈现飞速发展的状态。

1988年，我国进出口贸易总额首次突破1000亿美元；2004年，我国进出口贸易总额突破1万亿美元，居世界第三位；2007年，我国进出口贸易总额突破2万亿美元；2008年我国进出口贸易总额达到顶峰的25616亿美元。

2009年，由于全球金融危机的影响，我国进出口贸易总额为22072亿美元，依然具有很大的规模。

（2）进出口贸易依存度不断上升。

进出口贸易依存度是指一个国家或地区国民经济对进出口贸易活动的以来程度，通常用本国对外贸易额占本国GDP的比重来表示。

research proposal 完整结构首先，需要明确研究的主题，即中括号内的内容，以便在文章中进行深入探讨。

接下来，可以按照下述的结构，逐步回答问题。

1. 引言部分（Introduction）- 文章开头需要提出研究的背景和目的，引起读者的兴趣。

- 解释为什么研究主题重要，并提出研究问题。

2. 文献综述（Literature Review）- 对该主题已有的研究进行全面的评估和整理，确定研究的基础。

- 介绍相关理论，解释已有研究结果，以及可能存在的研究空白。

3. 研究问题与目标（Research Question and Objectives）- 提出明确的研究问题，以及希望通过该研究实现的目标。

- 阐述为什么研究该问题，有助于扩充现有知识。

4. 研究方法（Research Methodology）- 描述用于回答研究问题的研究方法（如调查、实验、文献分析等）。

- 理论上合理选择的研究方法，并解释为何选择这些方法。

5. 数据收集与分析（Data Collection and Analysis）- 说明数据来源和采集方法，以及数据或样本的质量保证措施。

- 描述数据分析方法，可使用统计工具或质性分析方法。

6. 预期结果与推论（Expected Results and Implications）- 阐述希望获得的结果，并解释结果对理论、政策或实践的影响。

- 讨论可能存在的不确定性，并提供解决不确定性的方法。

7. 讨论与结论（Discussion and Conclusion）- 对研究结果进行全面分析和讨论，与前述文献综述进行对比。

- 总结研究结果，回答研究问题，并提出对未来研究的建议。

8. 参考文献（References）- 列出所有在文章中引用过的文献，格式应符合规定的引用风格。

最后，需要注意保持文章的逻辑和条理性，并保证所提供的信息充分支持研究主题。

另外，文章中应有适当的图表、统计数据或示例来支持分析和讨论。