下载文档原格式
小学语文阅读教学方法探究图尔荪古丽•玉荪发布时间：2021-06-18T10:50:17.680Z 来源：《中国教师》2021年7月下作者：图尔荪古丽•玉荪[导读] 随着我国素质教育的不断发展和推进，人们逐渐意识到学生综合素养的重要性，小学语文阅读对于培养学生的综合素养以及良好的学习思考能力有着重要的意义。
阅读能够增加学生的语文知识，提高学生的文学鉴赏能力，同时还能够开阔学生的视野，培养其同理心，从而使其形成正确的人生观和世界观。
因此，小学语文教师应该重视阅读课程的设计，培养学生的阅读兴趣，促进小学生的健康成长。
图尔荪古丽•玉荪新疆喀什地区莎车县伊什库力乡拜什力克小学【摘要】随着我国素质教育的不断发展和推进，人们逐渐意识到学生综合素养的重要性，小学语文阅读对于培养学生的综合素养以及良好的学习思考能力有着重要的意义。
阅读能够增加学生的语文知识，提高学生的文学鉴赏能力，同时还能够开阔学生的视野，培养其同理心，从而使其形成正确的人生观和世界观。
因此，小学语文教师应该重视阅读课程的设计，培养学生的阅读兴趣，促进小学生的健康成长。
【关键词】小学语文；阅读教学；方法中图分类号：G688.2 文献标识码：A 文章编号：ISSN1672-2051（2021）7-053-02一、小学语文阅读教学中存在的问题1.阅读功利化现象严重就目前的情况来看，一部分教师对于语文阅读教学的目的把握不准，他们总是将阅读理解的考试分数以及升学考试作为教学的出发点，将阅读理解作为得到考试高分的途径。
因此，教师在阅读教学的过程中总是以考试为目标，在阅读之前为学生布置大量的问题，让学生在阅读的过程中随时关注问题的答案，这样一来，学生对文章的自我理解能力就会减弱，同时还会影响学生对于阅读节奏的把握以及对文章整体情感的理解。
这种教学不仅会白白消耗课堂时间，还会影响学生阅读习惯的培养，并不能增加学生对于阅读的兴趣，提高参与程度，进而学生也无法理解文章的内涵和艺术感，这对于学生语文素养的培养是没有益处的。
职业教育2019 年 6 月268论教师职业能力的提升方法及路径图尔荪古丽·伊卜拉伊木（巴楚县职业技能培训学校 新疆巴楚 843800）摘 要：随着时代的快速发展和教育改革的深化，教育发展要求与教师队伍质量之间存在的差距日渐凸显出来。
教师的队伍建设也正在从量的积累朝着质的飞跃方向转变，教师只有在实际的教学工作当中不断地提高自身在职业方面的能力，增强自身专业发展的速度，只有这样才能够更好地适应当前形势下对于教育发展的新要求。
基于此，本文针对教师职业能力的提升方法与路径展开深入的分析和研究，促进教师能够在良好的环境背景下获得更加全面的职业能力发展。
关键词：教师职业能力 提升方法 提升路径引言教育是能够促进社会进步、民族振兴的前提和基础，是能够满足当前社会经济发展对于人才需求和促进创新人才培养以及提升公民素质等方面的重要途径。
在当前形势下的教育事业同样的面临着较为严峻的挑战和良好发展的基于。
时代的变革需要更多的人才，要求不仅能够适应当前社会环境的变化，还应该针对新鲜咨询进行深入的学习、吸收和创新。
因此，促进教师在专业能力方卖弄的发展，构建高水平、高素质的教师队伍成为了当前时代发展的新使命。
由此能够看出，加强对教师职业能力的提升方法与路径的研究具有十分重要的作用和现实意义。
[1]一、规范教师管理与评价体制，促进教师职业能力持续发展1．规范教师职业能力测评制度提升教师的职业能力是教师职业能力和专业知识进行融合的结果，是需要进行长期的积累和培养而实现的。
构建规范的教师职业能力相关测评制度能够正确的督促和引导教师主动积极地重视自身在能力方面的构建，促使教师职业能力获得有效的发挥。
[2] 2．建立多元化的评价机制学校应该制定出符合教师实际情况、有助于新课改的相应评价制度。
这样就应该转变传统评价教师的方法。
新制度的建立不仅应该重视教学的效果、更加应该重视教学的过程，重视工作态度和过程、教研活动与课堂教学、学生评价与教师评价等方面的并重。
轮台县第一小学教师个人成长计划学校XXX XX新的一学年即将开始，回顾这一年来的教学，我对自己的这一年来的教学情况，学生情况，及班级整体学习情况都进行了一个深刻的反思，现就针对这些情况，制定如下计划，希望在下一学年能有所突破。
一、上学期考试基本情况：上学期期末考试，我所任教的四年级（1）、（2）、（5）、（6）、（7）五个班的218名学生参加测试，其中（1）、（2）班是A班，（5）、（6）、（7）是B班。
二、学生成绩统计表：三、班级情况分析：我所带的五个班级中，（1）班、（2）班是A班，学生是各班选出的学习能力和学习成绩都比较好的学生。
这两个班的学生在平时的学习中，听课情况较好，学习兴趣较高，每堂课能较好的完成学习目标，比如对所学内容掌握的情况比较好，学习效率较高，绝大部分同学能按时完成当天的作业（只有个别几个同学存在听课不认真，作业不按时完成的情况），对我要求的背单词，读课文，读句子等能比较高效地完成。
加上同学们自身主动学习的意愿比较强烈，因此体现在期末考试时的成绩也比较突出，成绩明显比其他班级要高出一块。
（5）班、（6）班、（7）班这三个班是B班。
这三个班的整体情况相比（1）班、（2）班要弱一些。
首先时学生之前的英语基础要弱，所以大部分同学之前所学的内容就学的不够扎实，还有部分同学的基础就更差了，因此在学习新知识时存在认知不清楚。
在我平时上课过程中，有部分同学学习兴趣不高，听课不专心，课后完成作业情况也不好。
大部分同学的学习积极性和主动行不强，需要在老师不断的提醒和督促下，才能完成基本的作业。
四、学生个人情况分析：本学期我在带这5个班的过程中，对A班的和B班的管理和投入的精力有关系，无论是在班级管理上还是对学生个体上来说都有一定的问题。
因为之前的教学经历中，没有同时带过这两种类型的班级，因此，在管理经验和方法方面都存在这不足，对两种类型的学生，我作为教师也没能很好的做好角色换位。
比如在A班中，绝大部分学生都是比较努力认真的，但是有极个别的学生隐藏在那些优等生中，不容易被老师发觉，因此往往会被忽略，他们的学习状态，思想动态，都不容易显现。
Size variation of conodont elements of the Hindeodus –Isarcicella clade during the Permian –Triassic transition in South China and its implication for mass extinctionGenming Luo a ,Xulong Lai a ,⁎,G.R.Shi b ,Haishui Jiang a ,Hongfu Yin a ,Shucheng Xie c ,Jinnan Tong c ,Kexin Zhang a ,Weihong He c ,Paul B.Wignall daFaculty of Earth Science,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,PR ChinabSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences,Deakin University,221Burwood Hwy,Burwood VIC 3125,Australia cKey Laboratory of Geobiology and Environmental Geology,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,PR China dSchool of Earth and Environment,University of Leeds,Leeds.LS29JT,United KingdomA B S T R A C TA R T I C L E I N F O Article history:Received 17August 2007Received in revised form 1April 2008Accepted 3April 2008Keywords:Multi-episode mass extinction ConodontHindeodus -Isarcicella Size reductionPermian –Triassic transition South ChinaBased on the analysis of thousands of conodont specimens from the Permian –Triassic (P –T)transition at Meishan (the GSSP of P –T Boundary)and Shangsi sections in South China,this study investigates the size variation of Hindeodus and Isarcicella P1elements during the mass extinction interval.The results demonstrate that Hin-deodus –Isarcicella underwent 4episodes of distinct size reduction during the P –T transition at the Meishan Section and 2episodes of size reduction in the earliest Triassic at Shangsi.The size reductions at Meishan took place at the junctions of beds 24d/24e,25/26,27b/27c and 28/29,and at the junctions of beds 28/29c and 30d/31a at Shangsi.The two earliest Triassic size reduction episodes were correlative between the two sections.These changes coincide with some important geological events such as eustatic sea-level changes,anoxic events,carbon isotope oscillations,miniaturization of brachiopods and microbial changes.Through detailed investigation of the palaeoenvironment and the palaeoecology of Hindeodus –Isarcicella ,the authors propose that the main causes of the size reduction was a sharp decline of food availability because of the mass extinction and the anoxic event during the P/T transition.The pattern of size reduction supports suggestions that the end-Permian mass extinction was multi-episodal,consisting of 3extinction events rather than a single catastrophic event.©2008Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.1.IntroductionThe end-Permian biotic crisis was the largest mass extinction in the fossil record.It eliminated over 90%of species in the oceans (Stanley and Yang,1994;Bambach et al.,2004)and about 70%of vertebrate families on land (Benton,1988;King,1991;Maxwell,1992).The cause or causes and duration as well as the nature of the extinction remain uncertain and actively debated (Wu and Liu,1991;Wignall and Hallam,1993;Isozaki,1997;Kozur,1998;Yin and Tong,1998;Jin et al.,2000;Yin et al.,2001;Wang and Cao,2004;Fang,2004a,b;Grice et al.,2005;Racki and Wignall,2005;Yin et al.,2007a ).The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP)of the Permian –Triassic Boundary at Meishan in Zhejiang Province,China has served as a focal point in this global debate,as it has provided much critical stratigraphical and palaeontological data.As a result,the section has received intensive multidisciplinary studies by various research groups,including lithostratigraphy,biostratigraphy,sedimentology,sequence stratigraphy,isotope geochemistry,eventostratigraphy,and magnetostratigraphy (Yin et al.,2001and references therein).There are several opinions about the causes and patterns of the P –T mass extinction (Isozaki,1997;Kozur,1998;Wang and Cao,2004;Fang,2004a,b;Grice et al.,2005;Racki and Wignall,2005).Some authors have proposed a single-episode catastrophic mass extinction (Jin et al.,2000;Kaiho et al.,2006),while others have argued for a multi-episode mass extinction (Wu and Liu,1991;Wignall and Hallam,1993;Yin and Tong,1998;Fang,2004a,b;Xie et al.,2005;Shen et al.,2006;Yin et al.,2007a ).In this paper,we attempt to test these various scenarios by using the size variation data of a group of conodont species from a single clade from several continuous Permian –Triassic boundary sections in South China.The fundamental question addressed in the study is to see if the sizes of conodont species varied across the PTB and,if so,whether or not the timing of the signi ficant size changes actually corresponded to any of the proposed PTB extinction intervals.A related question,also investi-gated as an integral part of this study,is to elucidate the possible cause (s)for the size change of the conodont species across the PTB.There is now a considerable literature relating size variation in lineages through time to biotic crises caused by environmental changes in earth history.Initially,Urbanek (1993)coined the term “Lilliput effect ”for an observed size reduction of Silurian graptolites during a biotic crisis.Subsequently,other researchers have reported similar size decreases during times of extinction;for example,the sizePalaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 264(2008)176–187⁎Corresponding author.Faculty of Earth Sciences,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan,Hubei 430074,PR China.Tel.:+862767883139;fax:+862787515956.E-mail address:xllai@ (X.Lai).0031-0182/$–see front matter ©2008Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.04.015Contents lists available at ScienceDirectPalaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecologyj o u r n a l h o me p a g e :w w w.e l sev i e r.c o m /l oc a t e /pa l a e oof late Devonian conodonts (Girard and Renaud,1996),heart urchins across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary (Jeffery,2001),and various organisms around the Permian/Triassic boundary (Twitchett,2001;He et al.,2005;Twitchett,2005a,b;Luo et al.,2006;Twitchett,2006;He et al.,2007;Twitchett,2007).It is widely held that there was no obvious change in conodont fortunes during the end-Permian mass extinction,because many conodont lineages clearly survived through the PTB (e.g.Clark et al.,1986;Jiang et al.,2007).However,the survival of lineages tends to overlook the potential ecological information that can come from the study of large conodont samples.Furthermore,unlike most other organisms,most Late Permian conodont species or their lineages persisted through into the Lower Triassic.Therefore,these conodonts can serve as the best material for the study of the size variation during the P –T transitional period.Luo et al.(2006)reported a size reduction in P1elements of the conodont genus Neogondolella at the bed 24d/24e junction (Upper Permian)at Meishan.However,the limited Neogondolella specimens from the Lower Triassic did not allow us to perform a full-scale size variation study throughout the Permian –Triassic transition.To overcome this shortfall,in this paper wehaveFig.1.A:Location map of study area in South China;Meishan Section (B)and Shangsi Section (C).(after Wingnall et al.,1995and Jiang et al.,2007).Table 1The total number,mean size,standard deviation,percentage of specimens larger than 0.5mm and 95%con fidence interval of the mean for the P1element of Hindeodus –Isarcicella from the P/T transition at the Meishan Section,Changxing,Zhejiang Province Bed24a 24b 24c 24d 24e 252627a 27b 27c 27d 2829Number 793957717289413314127017147Mean (mm)0.4580.4590.4430.5340.4360.5330.3920.4550.5030.4210.4670.5800.459Standard deviation 0.1320.1430.0790.0960.1000.0060.0430.0980.1080.1030.1580.1500.108Percentage (N 0.5mm)29.1133.3320.0076.6225.5310027.6647.3718.4434.4467.8438.3095%con fidence interval of the mean0.49130.49890.70020.56100.49510.58380.40480.47250.51820.43720.48710.60080.49260.42440.40260.18310.51440.35950.48220.36190.42980.48110.40170.44720.55360.4264177G.Luo et al./Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 264(2008)176–187chosen hindeodid conodonts because as a lineage they survived across the P–T boundary.The recovery and size measurement of abundant conodont specimens is time-consuming,and this kind of study has only previously been undertaken for the P–T transition(Luo et al., 2006).The present paper examines the size variations,in large samples,of conodonts from the Hindeodus–Isarcicella clade duringtheFig.2.Size distribution histogram of P1elements of Hindeodus–Isarcicella from each bed in ascending order(24a to29except for bed25)through the P/T transition at the Meishan Section A.Thefigures above each histogram are the total number of specimens in each size range.178G.Luo et al./Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology264(2008)176–187end Permian to earliest Triassic interval,with the aim of improving our understanding of the mass extinction patterns and of biotic recovery.2.Material and methodThirteen successive bulk samples ranging from bed24to bed29 (the PTB is sited at the bottom of bed27c)were collected from Section A at Meishan,Changxing,Zhejiang province(Fig.1).The sample from bed24was divided into5sub-beds(beds24a–e).Bed27was also evenly separated into4sub-beds(beds27a–d).Each of these13 samples weighed20kg.The clay samples collected from beds25and 28were processed directly by water.The other samples were crushed into1cm3size fragments and treated with dilute acetic acid(10%)to dissolve the samples.A 2.80–2.81g/ml gravity liquid made of bromoform(2.89g/ml)and acetone(0.79g/ml)was used in the conodont separation for all the samples.The conodonts were picked one by one under the binocular stereoscope.All the Meishan samples have been entirely processed over20months.The samples from the Shangsi Section have not been completely processed but in the earliest Triassic there are Hindeodus–Isarcicella elements for this work.Over20,000specimens were obtained from this processing.Among these,more than14,000were P1elements of Neogondolella,Hindeodus and Isarcicella,which are important elements during the P/T transition.A binocular stereoscope and micrometer were used to measure the length between the anterior and posterior ends of each well-preserved Hindeodus–Isarcicella P1element.First,the complete elements with both anterior and posterior parts were measured under the binocular stereoscope with the micrometer in the ocular.Secondly,each measured element was arrayed according to its size recorded in the notebook. Thirdly,the size of some randomly-chosen elements was measured and compared to the measurements obtained from thefirst step and found to be nearly the same.Finally,different personnel were employed to measure some of the randomly chosen elements(about30–40elements of each bed)and compared their measurements with those of thefirst person,and again both results were found to be nearly the same.The mean size,distribution histogram,standard deviation and95% confidence interval of the mean size were used to analyse the size distribution and variation of the conodonts.The mean size(X),which reflects the condition of a community,is based on the following equation:X¼1=N4X Ni¼1liwhere X is the mean size,N is the number measured in each bed and li is the length of each element.The95%confidence interval,reflecting whether the size reduction is credible on95%confidence,is based on the following equation:Y¼t a=2SffiffiffiffiNpwhere Y is thefluctuating range,t a=2is the t-test value of1−αconfidence,S is the standard deviation and N is the number measured from each bed.So,the confidence interval is(X−Y,X+Y),where X is the mean size,X−Y is the lower line,while X+Y is the upper line.3.Taxonomy and evolution of Hindeodus–IsarcicellaBoth hindeodid and isarcicellid P1elements are scaphate,with a robust cusp at the anterior and numbers of smaller denticles following the cusp.The hindeodid P1elements are symmetrical or slightly asymmetric,whilst the isarcicellid P1elements are extremely asymmetric.The cavity of hindeodid shows slight swelling but no thickening,whilst that of isarcicellids is both swollen and thickened. Some of the isarcicellid P1elements have a denticle or series of denticles on one side or both sides of the cavity surface.Interpreta-tions of the evolution of the hindeodid–isarcicellid lineage are controversial(Kozur,1996;Ding et al.,1997;Lai,1997;Wang and Wang,1997).Ding et al.(1997)thought that Hindeodus latidentatus–H. parvus–Isarcicella turgida–I.isarcica formed an anagenetic lineage. However,Wang and Wang(1997)replaced I.turgida with I.staeschei in the evolutionary sequence of(Ding et al.,1997).Nevertheless, almost all authors have accepted the idea of an evolutionary sequence from hindeodid to isarcicellid.Nicoll et al.(2002)proposed that the growth pattern of hindeodids occurred by the addition of denticles at the posterior.The length between the anterior and posterior is therefore an important size parameter for Hindeodus–Isarcicella.During the past two decades,the P–T conodonts at the Meishan section have received intensive studies(Lai et al.,1995;Zhang et al., 1995;Ding et al.,1997;Wang and Wang,1997;Mei et al.,1998).Based on large conodont samples,our group has established parallel gondolellid and hindeodid zones at this section(Jiang et al.,2007), and the hindeodid zones in ascending order are tidentatus zone, H.praeparvus zone,H.changxingensis zone,H.parvus zone,Isarcicella staeschei zone and I.isarcica zone from beds24a to29.According to the latest radiometric dates,the absolute age of bed28at the Meishan Section(GSSP)is250.7±0.3Ma,and that of bed25(white clay)is 251.4Ma(Bowring et al.,1998).Mundil et al.(2004)rectified their earlier data(Mundil et al.,2001),and suggested that the duration of the mass extinction was shorter.In any case,the duration from bed25 to28is about0.7million years.This0.7myr interval corresponds to4 hindeodid conodont zones and hence indicates that the evolutionary rates were high for the conodonts.4.Size variation in the Hindeodus–Isarcicella clade4.1.Data from the Meishan sectionThe number(all the complete elements from each bed),mean size and standard deviation of P1elements of Hindeodus–Isarcicella for each bed are shown in Table1,together with the95%confidence interval of the mean and the percentage of Hindeodus–Isarcicella P1 elements larger than0.5mm.The size distribution within each bed is shown in Fig.2.The mean size of all the individuals within a community which can more precisely reflect the living environment of this community is shown in Fig.3,of which the shadow interval shows the95%confidence interval of the mean.The dominant peak for bed24a is0.4–0.5mm,with element length showing a normal distribution(Fig.2).The dominant peak for bed24b is0.3–0.4mm,but with a marked right-skewed distribution (skeweness=0.3112).The dominant peak for bed24c is also0.4–0.5mm,with a normal distribution,although with fewerelements.Fig.3.Variation of the mean size of P1elements of Hindeodus–Isarcicella from the end Permian(bed24a)to early Triassic(bed29)at the Meishan Section.The black area is the 95%confidence interval of the mean size,and the central white circle and line show variation of the mean size.179G.Luo et al./Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology264(2008)176–187The dominant peak for bed 24d is 0.5–0.6mm,and it also appears to have a normal distribution.The dominant peak for bed 24e is 0.4–0.5mm,with a marked left-skewed trend.Both the two elements of bed 25are larger than 0.5mm,while the elements of bed 26are 0.3–0.5mm,with no element larger than 0.5mm.The dominant peaks for bed 27a and 27b are within 0.4–0.5mm,and their distribution approaches a normal distribution.The dominant peaks for bed 27c and 27d are 0.3–0.4mm,with slight right skew.The dominant peak for bed 28is 0.5–0.7mm,while that for bed 29is 0.4–0.5mm.Fig.3shows the size variation of conodont Hindeodus-Isarcicella P1element from the end Permian (bed 24a)to earliest Triassic (bed 29).The black area stands for the 95%con fidence interval of the mean,and the central white points and line of the area show the variation of mean size of specimens in each bed.As the graph (Fig.3)shows,during the transitions between beds 24e/24d,26/25,27c/27b and 29/28,the characters (mean size,dominant peak,percentage)of size variation exhibit distinct changes.The dominant peak and the mean size for bed 24d are 0.5–0.6mm and 0.534mm respectively,and the percentage with a size larger than 0.5mm is 76.62%,while these characters for bed 24e are 0.4–0.5mm,0.436mm and 25.53%,respectively.The 95%con fidence interval of the mean size shows that the upper line of bed 24e (0.4951)is smaller than the lower line of bed 24d (0.5144),so the size reduction is credible at a 95%con fidence level.The t -test for means shows that the size reduction was distinct (p =0.000).There are only two Hindeodus –Isarcicella P1elements in bed 25,both of which are larger than 0.5mm,with a mean size of 0.533mm,while in bed 26all the elements are less than 0.5mm,and the mean size is only 0.392mm.The t -test for means (p =0.002)indicates the size variation was signi ficant.Also,the size reduction in bed 26is credible as shown by the 95%con fidence interval of the mean shown in Table 1.In beds 27and 28,Hindeodus –Isarcicella replaced Neogondolella as the dominant genera.There are abundant Hindeo-dus –Isarcicella P1elements in these beds.Jiang et al.(2007)identi fied three assemblages from the end Permian (bed 24a)to the earliest Triassic (bed 29)by comparing the ratio of Hindeodus –Isarcicella P1elements to the Neogondolella P1elements,and beds 27and 28belong to their second assemblage.In bed 27b,the dominant peak and themean size are 0.4–0.5mm and 0.503mm,and the percentage with a size larger than 0.5mm is 47.37%,while in bed 27c,the dominate peak and the mean size are 0.3–0.4mm and 0.421mm respectively,and the percentage of size larger than 0.5mm is 18.44%.The upper line (0.4372)of the 95%con fidence interval of the mean at bed 27c is smaller than that of the lower line (0.4811)at bed 27b.The t -test for means (p =0.000)indicated that this reduction of size was undoubted.In bed 27d,the dominant peak is 0.3–0.4mm,the same as bed 27c,but the mean size is 0.467mm,and the percentage with a size larger than 0.5mm is 34.44%.The mean size in bed 28,where the largest specimens in these beds are found,is 0.580mm,the dominant peak is 0.5–0.6mm,and the percentage with a size larger than 0.5mm is 67.84%.However,in bed 29,the dominant peak and mean size are 0.4–0.5mm and 0.459mm,respectively,and the percentage with a size larger than 0.5mm is 38.30%.At the transition between these two beds,all the parameters vary distinctly,and the upper line (0.4926)of the 95%con fidence interval for bed 29is much smaller than the lower line (0.5536)for bed 28.t -test for means shows no reason to believe that the size reduction was not signi ficant (p =0.000).It is interesting to note that the size of P1elements of Hindeodus –Isarcicella in beds 25and 28is comparatively very large,especially in bed 28(see above).Both of these are clay beds,and previous workers have thought that the extinction took place at these levels (Fang,2004a,b;Xie et al.,2005).In order to determine whether or not the size variation of Hindeo-dus –Isarcicella populations was affected by the presence of different species,we investigated the size variation of a single species,Hindeodus typicalis ,from beds 24a to 24e.This reveals fluctuations similar to those shown by the overall population of conodonts,with a peak size in Bed 24d and a marked reduction in Bed 24e (Fig.4).t -test for means shows that the size reduction during this transition was signi ficant (p =0.007).4.2.Data from the Shangsi sectionTable 2,Figs.5and 6show the size variation of P1elements of Hindeodus –Isarcicella and Hindeodus from the Shangsi Section,Sichuan Province.The first change was recognized in thetransitionFig.4.Variation of the mean size of P1elements of Hindeodus typicalis from the end Permian (bed 24a to bed 24e)at the Meishan Section.The black area is the 95%con fidence interval of the mean size,and the central white circle and line show variation of the mean size.Table 2The total number,mean size,standard deviation and 95%con fidence interval of the mean of specimens of the P1element of Hindeodus-Isarcicella of earliest Triassic age from the Shangsi Section,Guangyuan,Sichuan Province Bed28c 28d 29a 29b 29c 30(b +c)30d 31a 31b 3233Number 1111247732104411915Mean(mm)0.3550.4310.1940.3390.3130.3900.4020.3480.3640.3430.455Standard deviation0.05100.0660.0440.1050.0660.0780.1140.0620.13195%Con fidence interval of the mean0.39490.36300.35380.46810.42560.36310.40040.37350.52770.32720.30430.27310.31230.37830.33290.32770.31340.3829Fig.5.Variation of the mean size of P1elements of Hindeodus –Isarcicella from the earliest Triassic of the Shangsi Section,Sichuan Province.180G.Luo et al./Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 264(2008)176–187between beds 29c and 28(combined beds 28c and 28d)in the Hin-deodus parvus zone (Lai et al.,1996).The upper line (0.3538)of the 95%con fidence interval of the mean size of bed 29c is larger than the lower line (0.3272)of bed 28,while the upper line of the 75%con fidence interval of the mean size of bed 29c (0.3321)is smaller than that of the lower line of bed 28(0.3381),and the t -test for means (p =0.021)also shows there is no reason to doubt this size reduction..The second size change was during the transition between bed 30d and 31a,in the I.isarcica zone.The upper line (0.3631)of the 95%con fidence interval of the mean size of specimens in bed 31a is smaller than the lower line (0.3783)for bed 30d.So,the size reduction of this episode is credible at a 95%con fidence level,and the t -test for means (p =0.001)also supports this phenomenon.As in the Meishan section,these data show that conodont size underwent two-episodes of reduction at the Shangsi section during the earliest Triassic.A comparison of the mean sizes of elements in these two sections shows that the mean size of hindeodid conodonts from the Shangsi Section is smaller than that of the Meishan Section.There is no reason to doubt that the difference in mean size is creditable as shown by a t -test of the means (p =0.000).This difference in means size between the two sections will be discussed below.5.DiscussionThe genera Hindeodus and Isarcicella survived the P –T mass extinction and then flourished in the earliest Triassic.Taxonomically,both genera present no obvious change after the major extinction events during the P –T transition.However,the Hindeodus –Isarcicella populations show several episodes of size reduction of P1elements in this interval.As shown in Fig.3–6,from the latest Permian to earliest Triassic the mean size of P1elements of Hindeodus –Isarcicella remained nearly the same except for the several times when they experienced obvious size reductions.If the size changes are evidence of biotic crisis (Girard and Renaud,1996;Schmidt et al.,2006;Twitchett,2007),it would indicate that there were several crises that affected the growth of the conodonts in the P/T transition period.Normally,it is dif ficult to distinguish juvenile hindeodids from small adult elements (Dr.Robert Nicoll,personal communication 2006).However,the texture and the thickness of the cavity are different in the juvenile and adults.The cavity of the juvenile is thin and translucent,whilst that of the adult is thick and ing this criterion,we interpret the size reductions of Hindeodus –Isarcicella elements in our study to be indicative of populations with a higher proportion of juveniles.The evolutionary rate of the hindeodid –isarcicellid clade through the PTB interval is very high,re flecting a rapidly changing environment.In this sense,these conodonts did respond to the P –T mass extinction.The temporal pattern of the conodont size variation is also coincident with someother important geological events such as an anoxic event,sea-level changes and carbon isotope oscillations (Fig.7).5.1.Palaeoecology of conodont Hindeodus –IsarcicellaThe palaeoecology of Hindeodus and Isarcicella is still controversial.There are two main views:one viewpoint considered Hindeodus –Isarcicella to be a near-shore,shallow water taxon (Clark,1974;Wardlaw and Collinson,1984;Tian,1993;Hirsch,1994;Baud,1996;Krystyn and Orchard,1996;Orchard,1996);the other supposed that Hindeodus –Isarcicella had a wide facies range and occurred both in shallow and deeper water environments (Behnkn,1975;Clark,1981;Zhang,1990;Kozur,1995,1996;Kozur,1998).Kozur (1995)also pointed out that Hindeodus shows no provincialism and straddles the P/T boundary and is therefore the most suitable genus for de fining the P/T boundary within a phylomorphogenetic line.Lai et al.(2001)and Lai and Zhang (1999),based on the evolution of Hindeodus –Isarcicella and Clarkina (Neogondolella ),and on palaeoen-vironmental interpretations of the Meishan D Section,concluded that Hindeodus was pelagic,found in sediments deposited at different depths,but living in the top layer of the ocean water.They also suggested that the replacement of Clarkina by Hindeodus was caused by the development of anoxic bottom waters during the Permian –Triassic transition and into the Early Triassic.If the upper water became anoxic (Grice et al.,2005;Huang et al.,2007),even Hindeo-dus –-Isarcicella would be affected.Nicoll et al.(2002)also noted that Hindeodus was present in a wide range of marine depositional environments,but they thought the replacement of Neogondolella by Hindeodus –Isarcicella was due to an increase of turbidity levels.If the turbidity of the water was one of the main factors affecting the size reduction of Neogondolella as proposed by Luo et al.(2006),it cannot have been the reason for the size reduction of the conodont Hindeo-dus –Isarcicella .On the basis of previous literature regarding the ecology of Hin-deodus –Isarcicella and the characters of these conodonts at the Meishan A section,the authors consider that Hindeodus –Isarcicella were pelagic conodonts,maybe dwelling in the photic-zone or somewhat deeper,thereby appearing as fossils in both shallow and deep water facies.The anoxic event may have impacted on the evolution of Hindeodus –Isarcicella,which suggested that perhaps implying photic zone anoxia (such as bed 27at the Meishan Section,Grice et al.,2005).There are also different opinions regarding the feeding mechan-isms of conodonts.Nicoll (1985,1987)thought that the conodont apparatus is the filtering array of a microphagous active suspension feeder,while others have interpreted it to be the grasping and food-processing structure of a macrophagous predator or scavenger (Briggs et al.,1983;Aldridge et al.,1987;Purnell,1993).In either case,the abrupt decline of food supplies could have driven the size reduction of the conodont populations,by creating high juvenile mortality.Based on the detailed study of the polygonal microsculpture of Neogondo-lella elements from bed 24e at Meishan (Jiang et al.,2008)indicates an high juvenile mortality at this bed.5.2.Palaeoenvironmental changes during the P/T transition5.2.1.Sea-level changesZhang et al.(1996)studied the sequence stratigraphy of the Meishan D section in detail and proposed that the top contact of bed 24d is a type II sequence boundary,that bed 24e was an upward shallowing parasequence,and that bed 27b to 29belongs to a transgressive systems i et al.(2001)and Lai and Zhang (1999)analyzed the sea-level change bed by bed from bed 24d to 29of the Meishan D section.They thought that the depth of deposition of bed 24d was about 20–60m,while that of bed 24e was about 30–40m.Bed 25,the “white clay bed ”,is composed of montmorillonite –illiteFig.6.Variation of the mean size of P1elements of Hindeodus from the earliest Triassic of the Shangsi Section,Sichuan Province.The black area is the 95%con fidence interval of the mean size,and the central white circle and line show variation of the mean size.181G.Luo et al./Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology 264(2008)176–187。
⏹结合阿里木的事迹谈谈实现各民族人民的共同愿望我们应该如何做=首页⏹民族的概念 =2⏹民族的共同特征=2⏹中华民族的形成=2-3⏹我国的民族概况=3⏹新疆的民族概况=3⏹我国各民族的人口分布特点=3⏹为什么说我国各民族共同缔造了统一的多民族国家=3-5⏹中国各族人民的共同愿望=国家统一⏹为什么说新疆是伟大祖国不可分割的一部分=5-7⏹七五事件=6⏹民族=8⏹内地和新疆（输入输出）=8-9⏹丝绸之路含义=10⏹丝绸之路的重要性，历史作用=10⏹绢马互市，茶马互市=10⏹新疆的区情特点对我国经济发展，睦邻友好，边防巩固具有什么重要意义=11⏹为什么说中华文化源远流长，博大精深=14-15⏹作为新疆的一名青少年，在发展新疆民族文化上应怎样做=15⏹新疆各民族文化主要有哪些表现形式=15-16⏹举例说明，在现实生活中各民族文化通过哪些形式在互相学习和互相交流中发展=17 ⏹新疆传统艺术=18-19⏹新疆还有那些优秀民族文化遗产已经被列入世界非物质文化遗产名录=19⏹冰山上的来客=20⏹新疆民族概况（主要民族）=22⏹新疆民族分布人口有什么特点=22-23⏹新疆部分民族的渊源(维吾尔族，汉族，哈萨克族，回族，柯尔克孜族，蒙古族)=23-25 ⏹怎样理解‘新疆各民族都是中华大家庭的一员’请你说说自己的看法=25⏹新疆各族人民翻身当家做主人表现在哪些方面=31⏹国家重视培养和选拔少数民族干部大的主要原因=31⏹新疆发生巨变的表现=31⏹改革开放以来，新疆发生哪些翻天覆地的变化（根本原因）=32-34⏹国家开办“内高班”“区内初中班”实施双语教育有什么意义=33⏹西部瓜王，吴明珠=36⏹新疆经济社会发展取得举世瞩目成就的主要原因，根本原因=39-42⏹党和政府在哪些方面对新疆给予了大力的支持=40-41⏹国家对新疆人才支持和培养有哪些计划=41⏹国家支持新疆发展的举措对新疆发展起了什么作用=41⏹全国19个省市对口支援新疆的目的是什么=42⏹兄弟省市的鼎力相助新疆，主要有哪些举措=42⏹新疆各族人民的共同愿望=42⏹新疆发展进步的重要内容=46⏹新疆繁荣昌盛的重要保障=46⏹新疆各族人民的共同愿望=46⏹新疆各族人民的根本利益=46⏹建设社会主义和谐社会的必然要求=46⏹加快少数民族和民族地区发展的根本利益=46⏹加快少数民族和民族地区发展的重要保障=46⏹新疆团结稳定的思想基础（四个认同）=47⏹每个中国公民最基本的政治信念=四个认同⏹原则底线=四个认同⏹国家稳定的前提=四个认同⏹国家稳定的前提=四个认同⏹民族团结的精神基石=四个认同⏹人民对祖国的认同和热爱集中鲜明的体现=48⏹三个离不开=48⏹伟大民族精神（以爱国主义为核心）=49⏹新疆各族人民牢固树立“中华文化认同”意识=49⏹解决我国民族问题的根本道路=49⏹我国各族人民的共同事业=49⏹为什么说团结稳定是新疆社会繁荣发展的重要保障=49-50⏹新疆社会发展，繁荣昌盛的前提和保障=49⏹新疆各项事业取得胜利的基本保证=49⏹新疆各族人民共同进步发展的重要条件=49⏹各族人民的强烈愿望=50⏹团结，发展，稳定三者的关系=50⏹三个不动摇=50⏹什么是影响新疆团结稳定的主要危险=51⏹我对三股势力的认识=51⏹我们同三股势力斗争的实质=51⏹国家的最高利益=51⏹各族人民的根本利益=51⏹世界影响较大的宗教=57⏹我国主要宗教=57⏹新疆各民族中流传的宗教=58⏹国家民族政策的主要内容=59⏹维护民族团结的重要条件=59⏹青少年必须自觉遵守国家宗教政策表现=59⏹青年学生要做到不信教，不参加宗教活动的原因=59-60⏹我国教育的性质，目的=60⏹我国教育的根本目的=60⏹对于宗教，青少年应怎样做=60-61⏹请你谈谈作为中学生，我们应该怎样做一个遵纪守法的好公民，为维护新疆的民族团结做贡献=66⏹作为中国公民，树立正确的国家观=68⏹国家利益的特征=68⏹国家利益的含义=68⏹各族人民的最高利益=国家利益⏹全国各族人民的根本，长远，共同利益的集中体现=国家利益⏹怎样理解国家利益高于一切=68⏹公民意识的集中体现=遵纪守法⏹公民意识的含义=69⏹青少年作为国家未来的主人，为什么要从小树立国家观念，强化自己的公民意识=68-69 ⏹基本政策=70⏹基本原则=70⏹新型民族关系=70⏹中国处理民族问题的根本原则=民族团结⏹中国民族政策的核心内容=民族团结⏹国家统一的重要保证=民族团结⏹社会稳定的重要前提=民族团结⏹各项社会事业发展的重要保障=民族团结⏹民族团结的重要性=70⏹怎样以实际行动维护民族团结=70⏹五观=70⏹分析说明搞好对口支援，推进新疆跨越式发展意义（为什么要对口援疆）=末页⏹做好新形势下新疆工作需要国家怎么做=末页⏹维护民族团结，人人有责，对此你准备怎么做=末页⏹建设繁荣富裕，和谐稳定的社会主义新疆，让新疆各族人民生活的更加美好你有没有信心，分析信心来源（新疆取得辉煌成就的主要原因）=末页。
文理考号姓名科目班级原始分T分数Z分数全科Y07003100101努尔伊力·热合曼语文14055.20.52全科Y07003100102吾麦尔·阿卜拉语文157.572.9 2.29全科Y07003100103萨伍尔·努尔麦麦提语文134.549.8-0.02全科Y07003100104王兔云语文138.2553.40.34全科Y07003100105阿卜杜拉·阿卜杜克热木语文142.557.70.77全科Y07003100106吐尔孙江·麦麦提语文136.7551.90.19全科Y07003100107阿力木·阿不力克木语文131.546.7-0.33全科Y07003100108徐基焜语文142.75580.8全科Y07003100109阿力木·阿卜杜喀迪尔语文13651.20.12全科Y07003100110艾泽买提江·阿力木语文12742.2-0.78全科Y07003100111阿卜杜米吉提·排尔哈提语文132.7548-0.2全科Y07003100112努尔艾力·阿布迪热合曼语文131.546.7-0.33全科Y07003100113纪子才语文149.2564.6 1.46全科Y07003100114阿不杜外力·麦麦提敏语文125.540.7-0.93全科Y07003100115姜智瑞语文135.550.70.07全科Y07003100116阿卜杜赛米·阿布都伟力语文152.7568.1 1.81全科Y07003100117吴杨语文129.7545-0.5全科Y07003100119刘远东语文133.548.7-0.13全科Y07003100120阿卜杜萨拉木·艾散语文130.2545.5-0.45全科Y07003100121淡飞语文132.7548-0.2全科Y07003100122李湘语文14156.20.62全科Y07003100123西尔穆海麦提·克热木语文121.536.6-1.34全科Y07003100124阿卜迪萨拉木·麦麦图尔荪语文13146.2-0.38全科Y07003100125徐如寒语文133.7549-0.1全科Y07003100126孙泰杰语文13651.20.12全科Y07003100127麦尔旦江·穆合塔尔语文131.2546.5-0.35全科Y07003100128乃斯如拉·麦麦提语文133.548.7-0.13全科Y07003100129陈阳阳语文134.549.8-0.02全科Y07003100130依卜拉依木·乌麦尔语文128.2543.4-0.66全科Y07003100201姚波语文125.7540.9-0.91全科Y07003100203阿卜杜克尤木·吾拉木语文130.7546-0.4全科Y07003100204奥斯曼·伊斯坎代尔语文136.7551.90.19全科Y07003100205夏乐语文123.2538.4-1.16全科Y07003100206陈冠良语文122.2537.4-1.26全科Y07003100207阿卜杜哈力克·麦麦提语文13146.2-0.38全科Y07003100208萨拉木·艾力语文131.546.7-0.33全科Y07003100209阿卜杜萨拉木·库尔班语文125.540.7-0.93全科Y07003100210艾科拜尔·库尔班语文12843.2-0.68全科Y07003100211海日古丽·艾散语文138.553.70.37全科Y07003100212阿依谢·木太力普语文144.2559.50.95全科Y07003100213阿依提拉·阿卜杜如苏力语文149.564.8 1.48全科Y07003100214努尔比亚姆·麦麦提语文140.75560.6全科Y07003100215布阿提开姆·胡达拜尔迪语文161.2576.7 2.67全科Y07003100216阿丽耶·安瓦尔语文140.75560.6全科Y07003100217再努尔·阿卜力克木语文136.2551.40.14全科Y07003100218刘碧灵语文145.2560.5 1.05全科Y07003100219图柯孜·奥斯曼语文144.559.80.98全科Y07003100220古丽妮格尔·阿迪力语文148.563.8 1.38全科Y07003100221阿比代姆·阿布都伟力语文147.2562.5 1.25全科Y07003100222蔡魏萍语文146.561.8 1.18全科Y07003100223古丽则巴·凯赛尔语文145.2560.5 1.05全科Y07003100224茹克耶姆·阿卜杜热合曼语文14156.20.62全科Y07003100225阿米乃姆·尼扎米丁语文15671.4 2.14全科Y07003100226赛比努尔·热麦提语文15065.3 1.53全科Y07003100227艾提古丽·阿卜力克木语文141.75570.7全科Y07003100228帕提麦姆·麦麦提敏语文146.561.8 1.18全科Y07003100229阿依努尔·格亚斯语文134.2549.5-0.05全科Y07003100230徐晶语文15368.3 1.83全科Y07003100301阿伊谢·木合台尔语文140.555.70.57全科Y07003100302布热比古丽·如则语文137.7552.90.29全科Y07003100303麦尔哈巴·伊力语文128.543.7-0.63全科Y07003100304齐语薇语文133.7549-0.1全科Y07003100305祖丽胡玛尔·艾尼外尔语文133.548.7-0.13全科Y07003100306纪瑶瑶语文131.546.7-0.33全科Y07003100307艾斯米拉·艾力克木语文143.2558.50.85全科Y07003100308苏比努尔·图尔荪语文14964.3 1.43全科Y07003100310艾斯凯尔·艾衣萨语文246.561.8 1.18全科Y07003100311王昌语文247.7563 1.3全科Y07003100312阿卜杜赛麦提·麦麦提图尔荪语文240.555.70.57全科Y07003100313阿卜杜克尤木·喀迪尔语文237.7552.90.29全科Y07003100314安再尔·亚森语文231.7547-0.3全科Y07003100315艾克拜尔·吾拉木语文218.533.6-1.64全科Y07003100316袁志强语文232.547.7-0.23全科Y07003100317拜合提亚尔·奥卜力语文22540.2-0.98全科Y07003100318伊敏江·阿布来提语文253.2568.6 1.86全科Y07003100319秦冰航语文23853.20.32全科Y07003100320麦麦提玉苏普·吐尔孙语文229.2544.5-0.55全科Y07003100321吐尼亚孜·热伊木语文219.534.6-1.54全科Y07003100322杨世林语文247.7563 1.3全科Y07003100323夏文海语文215.7530.8-1.92全科Y07003100324依布拉音江·麦麦提吐尔逊语文235.7550.90.09全科Y07003100325穆阿迪力·亚森语文234.549.8-0.02全科Y07003100326麦麦提艾力·阿布力孜语文249.7565.1 1.51全科Y07003100327夏马穆尔·麦麦提语文230.2545.5-0.45全科Y07003100328阿卜杜拉萨拉木·依达依提语文230.7546-0.4全科Y07003100329穆斯塔帕·库尔班语文238.553.70.37全科Y07003100401阿布都萨拉木·阿巴拜科日语文228.543.7-0.63全科Y07003100402阿卜都克尤木·阿布力米提语文232.547.7-0.23全科Y07003100403麦合木提江·阿迪力语文235.550.70.07全科Y07003100404张乐语文258.7574.2 2.42全科Y07003100405代家乐语文241.2556.50.65全科Y07003100406刘宇栋语文236.551.70.17全科Y07003100407阿卜杜萨拉木·图尔孙语文237.2552.40.24全科Y07003100408高鑫语文239.2554.50.45全科Y07003100409叶泽庆语文220.535.6-1.44全科Y07003100410哈力木拉提·库尔班语文226.7541.9-0.81全科Y07003100411乔欢语文243.558.70.87全科Y07003100412赵晨晨语文236.2551.40.14全科Y07003100413艾力夏提·艾斯开尔语文25267.3 1.73全科Y07003100415阿卜杜外力·努尔麦麦提语文240.555.70.57全科Y07003100416刘琪语文258.2573.6 2.36全科Y07003100417高天语文25368.3 1.83全科Y07003100418穆耶赛尔·阿布力克木语文256.2571.6 2.16全科Y07003100419阿尔孜古丽·乌布力喀斯木语文230.2545.5-0.45全科Y07003100420布麦尔耶姆·艾热提江语文25974.4 2.44全科Y07003100421古丽切合热·艾尼外尔语文253.568.8 1.88全科Y07003100422再图妮古丽·玉苏普语文241.2556.50.65全科Y07003100423米日班姑·买买提敏语文236.7551.90.19全科Y07003100425杨可语文238.2553.40.34全科Y07003100426孜来柯孜·阿卜杜热扎克语文247.2562.5 1.25全科Y07003100427阿依米拉·阿卜力克木语文256.571.9 2.19全科Y07003100428阿丽亚·艾萨语文244.559.80.98全科Y07003100429田英语文227.2542.4-0.76全科Y07003100430祖木来提·吐尔洪语文244.2559.50.95全科Y07003100501杨洋语文236.551.70.17全科Y07003100502蔺宇晗语文237.552.70.27全科Y07003100503热依拉姆·胡吉语文23247.2-0.28全科Y07003100504李夏夏语文245.560.8 1.08全科Y07003100505阿依米拉·艾力克木语文253.7569.1 1.91全科Y07003100506梁泠语文26378.4 2.84全科Y07003100507布帕提麦·阿卜杜喀迪尔语文244.559.80.98全科Y07003100508阿丽米热·巴图尔语文22742.2-0.78全科Y07003100509努尔加玛丽·萨迪克语文23651.20.12全科Y07003100510彭家靓语文225.2540.4-0.96全科Y07003100511阿力耶·阿卜杜克尤木语文235.7550.90.09全科Y07003100512热沙莱提·苏力坦语文23247.2-0.28全科Y07003100513妮萨海妮姆·图尔荪语文23449.3-0.07全科Y07003100514阿卜杜拉·肉孜语文346.561.8 1.18全科Y07003100515麦合木江·阿卜力米提语文331.7547-0.3全科Y07003100516阿卜杜拉·阿力木语文347.562.8 1.28全科Y07003100517库尔班江·居马贡语文329.2544.5-0.55全科Y07003100518萨伍提·阿巴拜科热语文335.550.70.07全科Y07003100519艾合麦提江·木塞依甫语文337.7552.90.29全科Y07003100520古丽妮盖尔·阿米提语文35671.4 2.14全科Y07003100521谢依代·于散江语文362.7578.2 2.82全科Y07003100522阿依加玛丽·艾尼外尔语文346.7562 1.2全科Y07003100523艾斯玛·沙吾提江语文345.560.8 1.08全科Y07003100524茹克亚·萨吾提语文351.7567.1 1.71全科Y07003100525艾丽菲热·麦麦提敏语文34257.20.72全科Y07003100526娜菲赛·木萨江语文346.2561.5 1.15全科Y07003100527穆尼热·阿布都克日木语文338.75540.4全科Y07003100528再乃普古丽·塞来语文35065.3 1.53全科Y07003100529图柯孜·麦麦提热依木语文35772.4 2.24全科Y07003100530伊斯热伊力·图尔孙江语文339.554.70.47全科Y07003100601阿卜杜加帕尔·阿卜杜伊依木语文323.538.6-1.14全科Y07003100602努尔麦麦江·伊力语文34661.3 1.13全科Y07003100603鲁克曼·萨伍提语文343.75590.9全科Y07003100604努尔麦麦提·阿卜杜纳斯尔语文331.2546.5-0.35全科Y07003100605阿卜杜拉·买合木提语文338.2553.40.34全科Y07003100606艾麦提·阿布力孜语文32742.2-0.78全科Y07003100607库尔班·安外热语文321.536.6-1.34全科Y07003100608麦麦提艾力.艾麦提语文33550.20.02全科Y07003100609阿依姆伊热·阿布都拉语文35570.4 2.04全科Y07003100610伊斯坎代尔·库尔班语文332.2547.5-0.25全科Y07003100611托合提古丽·玉苏云语文34661.3 1.13全科Y07003100612古丽则巴·阿卜杜热依木语文337.2552.40.24全科Y07003100613穆妮热·阿布来提语文348.7564.1 1.41全科Y07003100614喀米然·阿不都米吉提语文322.537.6-1.24全科Y07003100615伊斯马伊力·图尔贡语文324.539.7-1.03全科Y07003100616穆斯塔帕·艾力语文334.75500全科Y07003100617拜合提亚尔·阿卜杜克尤木语文323.538.6-1.14全科Y07003100618库尔班江·麦丁语文33752.20.22全科Y07003100619麦麦提江·阿比迪合尼语文328.543.7-0.63全科Y07003100620斯力木·阿代木语文338.553.70.37全科Y07003100621穆再依排尔·麦麦提力语文347.2562.5 1.25全科Y07003100622阿卜杜拉·伊德日斯语文349.2564.6 1.46全科Y07003100623古丽扎尔·图尔共语文35873.4 2.34全科Y07003100624布合力且姆·艾散江语文35469.4 1.94全科Y07003100625努尔阿米娜·阿卜力米提语文35570.4 2.04全科Y07003100626热娜古丽·艾则孜语文35166.3 1.63全科Y07003100627古丽米热·图尔贡江语文344.2559.50.95全科Y07003100628布再娜普·伊斯马伊力语文336.2551.40.14全科Y07003100629祖力皮亚·图尔荪语文34762.3 1.23全科Y07003100630阿卜杜拉·阿卜莱提语文435.7550.90.09全科Y07003100701米日妮萨·麦麦提托合提语文435.2550.40.04全科Y07003100702麦麦提江·艾尔肯语文43247.2-0.28全科Y07003100703麦麦提敏·毛拉木语文435.550.70.07全科Y07003100704穆太力普·吾拉木语文42439.2-1.08全科Y07003100705穆斯塔发·喀迪尔语文43247.2-0.28全科Y07003100706阿卜杜艾尼·吾拉木语文431.2546.5-0.35全科Y07003100707古丽巴哈尔·米合曼夏语文433.7549-0.1全科Y07003100708阿卜杜克日木·奥卜力塔力普语文42641.2-0.88全科Y07003100709艾山·巴拉提语文425.7540.9-0.91全科Y07003100710玉苏普艾力·伊斯马依力语文416.531.6-1.84全科Y07003100711阿卜杜瓦哈普江·亚库普语文432.547.7-0.23全科Y07003100712阿力木江·艾海提语文439.75550.5全科Y07003100713阿卜杜拉·居尔艾提语文423.538.6-1.14全科Y07003100714努尔麦麦提·艾克木语文41732.1-1.79全科Y07003100715穆海麦德·奥布力阿西木语文424.7539.9-1.01全科Y07003100716喀则·麦色塔尼语文424.2539.4-1.06全科Y07003100717阿依提拉·喀迪尔语文44661.3 1.13全科Y07003100718热米拉.阿尔斯兰语文434.75500全科Y07003100719迪丽努尔·吐尔孙语文446.561.8 1.18全科Y07003100720米热班古丽·阿卜杜热合曼语文428.7543.9-0.61全科Y07003100721热责依木·艾麦提语文43651.20.12全科Y07003100722谢日排木·艾孜艾丽语文433.2548.5-0.15全科Y07003100723热娜古丽·阿巴斯语文442.75580.8全科Y07003100724热依汉古丽·玉苏云语文439.75550.5全科Y07003100725布威麦尔耶姆·麦麦提语文439.2554.50.45全科Y07003100726麦热姆妮萨古丽·拜科日语文438.2553.40.34全科Y07003100727唐努尔·图尔孙语文443.558.70.87全科Y07003100728苏比努尔·阿力木江语文43449.3-0.07全科Y07003100729努尔曼古丽·托合提语文439.75550.5全科Y07003100730阿依米热·约麦尔江语文44156.20.62全科Y07003100801麦尔耶姆古丽·阿卜来提语文43348.2-0.18全科Y07003100802努尔扎迪耶姆·阿卜杜如苏力语文427.542.7-0.73全科Y07003100803布合力其木·阿迪力语文44560.3 1.03全科Y07003100804阿丽耶·玉苏普艾麦提语文432.547.7-0.23全科Y07003100805萨吉代姆·亚库甫语文425.2540.4-0.96全科Y07003100806图柯孜·图尔贡语文423.538.6-1.14全科Y07003100807布阿依谢木·伊米尔约塞尹语文440.555.70.57全科Y07003100808努尔加马丽·图尔迪语文42843.2-0.68全科Y07003100809阿尔孜古丽·麦麦提艾力语文429.2544.5-0.55全科Y07003100810苏逼努尔·阿卜杜赛麦提语文435.550.70.07全科Y07003100811阿斯姆古丽·阿卜杜喀迪尔语文422.2537.4-1.26全科Y07003100812萨那外尔·艾合麦提江语文43146.2-0.38全科Y07003100813赛比努尔·阿卜来提语文437.2552.40.24全科Y07003100814古丽苏姆·阿卜杜热扎克语文436.551.70.17全科Y07003100815布威麦尔耶姆·玉苏普语文435.550.70.07全科Y07003100816布麦尔耶姆·玉苏普语文441.2556.50.65全科Y07003100817阿妮合妮姆·阿卜拉语文41833.1-1.69全科Y07003100818阿瓦古丽·阿卜杜如苏力语文43247.2-0.28全科Y07003100819麦热吉古丽·肉孜语文438.553.70.37全科Y07003100820阿卜杜艾尼·阿迪力语文427.542.7-0.73全科Y07003100821阿卜杜拉.阿卜杜克热木语文43247.2-0.28全科Y07003100822阿卜杜克尤木·麦麦提敏语文426.541.7-0.83全科Y07003100823伊马木艾散·阿卜杜热西提语文420.535.6-1.44全科Y07003100824阿力木·伊斯拉木语文42843.2-0.68全科Y07003100825麦麦提艾力·塔西语文530.545.7-0.43全科Y07003100826阿卜来提·图尔荪语文537.552.70.27全科Y07003100827阿卜杜热合曼·图尔贡语文524.539.7-1.03全科Y07003100828阿卜杜克尤木·玉苏普喀迪尔语文528.7543.9-0.61全科Y07003100829阿卜杜克尤木·如则语文529.2544.5-0.55全科Y07003100830努尔艾合麦提·艾散语文52237.1-1.29全科Y07003100901努尔艾力·米吉提语文545.2560.5 1.05全科Y07003100902麦麦提艾力.艾合麦江语文52742.2-0.78全科Y07003100903艾合太木江·阿卜杜克尤木语文533.7549-0.1全科Y07003100904阿卜杜扎伊尔·阿巴拜科日语文523.2538.4-1.16全科Y07003100905麦瓦兰·麦米提力语文535.2550.40.04全科Y07003100906艾孜提吾麦尔·亚森语文528.7543.9-0.61全科Y07003100907麦麦提热西提·托合提艾麦提语文542.75580.8全科Y07003100908伊卜拉伊木·麦麦提图尔洪语文536.2551.40.14全科Y07003100909麦麦提·麦麦提热伊木语文528.543.7-0.63全科Y07003100910努尔艾合麦提·艾力语文52035.1-1.49全科Y07003100911阿卜杜合力力·乌热依木语文515.2530.3-1.97全科Y07003100912努尔麦麦提·图尔荪语文524.7539.9-1.01全科Y07003100913毛拉洪·阿卜拉语文521.7536.9-1.31全科Y07003100914萨齐代姆·努尔语文538.75540.4全科Y07003100915古丽柯孜·伊斯拉木语文531.2546.5-0.35全科Y07003100916热孜宛古丽·阿巴拜科日语文54156.20.62全科Y07003100917茹柯耶·阿不来提语文545.2560.5 1.05全科Y07003100918祖拜格代·阿布都热伊木语文541.556.70.67全科Y07003100919努尔古丽·托合提语文53651.20.12全科Y07003100920热依罕古丽·艾尼语文54560.3 1.03全科Y07003100921努尔比耶姆.萨伍提语文54560.3 1.03全科Y07003100922色热吉古丽·伊斯马依力语文538.75540.4全科Y07003100923排孜莱提古丽·伊斯马伊力语文54358.20.82全科Y07003100924迪丽努尔·萨吾提语文53752.20.22全科Y07003100925图尔孙古力·亚森语文544.75601全科Y07003100926屯妮萨·伊力亚斯语文542.557.70.77全科Y07003100927古丽孜巴·多力坤语文543.558.70.87全科Y07003100928阿斯古丽.图尔迪语文537.552.70.27全科Y07003100929谢尔瓦奶姆·如则语文528.543.7-0.63全科Y07003100930麦尔哈巴·艾尼瓦尔语文53146.2-0.38全科Y07003101001阿丽耶.伊卜拉伊木语文536.2551.40.14全科Y07003101002布阿依谢木.玉苏普语文526.7541.9-0.81全科Y07003101003布威再乃普·达毛拉语文545.560.8 1.08全科Y07003101004热依汉古丽·麦合木提语文53348.2-0.18全科Y07003101005阿依木古丽·托合提语文53550.20.02全科Y07003101006海日妮萨古丽·麦麦提语文549.2564.6 1.46全科Y07003101007莱提皮姆·艾力艾科拜尔语文537.2552.40.24全科Y07003101008热依莱·阿卜来提语文532.2547.5-0.25全科Y07003101009再吐乃木·图尔贡语文530.545.7-0.43全科Y07003101010阿依谢木古力·麦麦提敏语文535.550.70.07全科Y07003101011艾提古丽·阿力木语文544.2559.50.95全科Y07003101012加拉力丁·阿巴拜科日语文52944.2-0.58全科Y07003101013尼亚孜合妮姆·吾拉木语文53348.2-0.18全科Y07003101014热依罕古丽·阿卜杜热合曼语文539.554.70.47全科Y07003101015排热代姆·谢木西丁语文542.75580.8全科Y07003101016再乃普古丽·麦麦提语文534.75500全科Y07003101017塞外热古丽·塔依语文53348.2-0.18全科Y07003101018阿曼古丽·图尔荪语文538.2553.40.34全科Y07003101019努尔艾则木·赛麦提语文535.2550.40.04全科Y07003101020如孜毛拉·阿卜力米提语文62843.2-0.68全科Y07003101022罗克曼·玉苏普语文632.7548-0.2全科Y07003101023阿卜杜力艾则孜·阿卜杜喀迪尔语文63247.2-0.28全科Y07003101024于苏甫艾力·乌麦尔语文635.550.70.07全科Y07003101025阿卜杜苏普尔.艾力语文636.551.70.17全科Y07003101026伊卜拉伊木·萨伍提语文648.2563.5 1.35全科Y07003101027阿卜杜瓦哈普·阿卜杜热合曼语文63045.2-0.48全科Y07003101028阿卜力克木·阿伍提语文629.7545-0.5全科Y07003101029艾萨江·阿迪力语文630.2545.5-0.45全科Y07003101030努尔萨力·麦麦提喀迪尔语文632.7548-0.2全科Y07003101101穆海麦提·麦麦提图孙语文62742.2-0.78全科Y07003101102木海麦提江·海尼语文636.2551.40.14全科Y07003101103阿卜杜萨拉木·麦麦提语文626.7541.9-0.81全科Y07003101104阿卜杜拉·阿布都热依木语文61732.1-1.79全科Y07003101105乃比江·艾散江语文626.2541.4-0.86全科Y07003101106伊力哈木·艾尔肯语文62338.1-1.19全科Y07003101107阿卜杜吾普尔·哈力克语文619.534.6-1.54全科Y07003101108伊力亚尔·麦麦提敏语文614.7529.8-2.02全科Y07003101109阿卜杜热扎克.阿迪力语文631.2546.5-0.35全科Y07003101110布麦尔耶姆古丽·麦麦提语文634.549.8-0.02全科Y07003101111古丽米热·巴托尔语文640.555.70.57全科Y07003101112海热妮萨古丽·阿卜杜拉语文637.7552.90.29全科Y07003101113玛伊热·图迪语文629.7545-0.5全科Y07003101114如鲜古丽·马木提语文64156.20.62全科Y07003101115祖丽皮耶·赫克木语文634.549.8-0.02全科Y07003101116阿依鲜·艾麦提语文639.554.70.47全科Y07003101117卜麦妮耶姆.阿卜杜艾尼语文64863.3 1.33全科Y07003101118艾拉努尔·于苏甫喀迪尔语文646.561.8 1.18全科Y07003101119米合尔班古丽·艾斯开尔语文64358.20.82全科Y07003101120阿日孜古丽·阿卜力克木语文643.2558.50.85全科Y07003101121热孜耶.伊斯马依力语文635.7550.90.09全科Y07003101122哈妮柯孜·铁木尔语文633.2548.5-0.15全科Y07003101123穆妮热·吾舒尔语文628.543.7-0.63全科Y07003101124古丽再丽努尔·阿布都热依木语文633.548.7-0.13全科Y07003101125图尔荪阿依·亚森语文626.7541.9-0.81全科Y07003101126阿伊谢·麦麦提语文630.545.7-0.43全科Y07003101127苏米耶·玉苏普语文634.2549.5-0.05全科Y07003101128热依汗古丽·亚库普语文630.7546-0.4全科Y07003101129热依拉木·莫拉木语文627.542.7-0.73全科Y07003101130阿尔祖古丽·图尔荪语文629.544.7-0.53全科Y07003101201米乃瓦尔·阿卜杜艾尼语文630.2545.5-0.45全科Y07003101202迪丽努尔·艾萨语文635.2550.40.04全科Y07003101203妮萨古丽·图尔贡语文638.553.70.37全科Y07003101204库尔班妮萨·阿力木江语文648.563.8 1.38全科Y07003101205茹克耶姆·赛排尔语文644.75601全科Y07003101206古再丽努尔.阿卜杜热伊木语文625.7540.9-0.91全科Y07003101207穆海麦提.阿卜杜瓦斯提语文620.535.6-1.44全科Y07003101208热依汗古丽·喀吾力语文62944.2-0.58全科Y07003101209阿不都卡哈尔·阿卜迪克热木语文63550.20.02全科Y07003101210阿卜杜萨塔尔·图尔贡语文739.2554.50.45全科Y07003101211艾力加海提·艾孜提力语文737.7552.90.29全科Y07003101212玉苏普艾力·阿卜杜艾尼语文729.7545-0.5全科Y07003101213阿比迪塔伊尔·吾麦尔艾力语文727.542.7-0.73全科Y07003101214亚库普江·奥斯曼江语文72944.2-0.58全科Y07003101215阿巴斯喀热.阿不拉语文72944.2-0.58全科Y07003101216伊卜拉伊木·玉苏普语文743.2558.50.85全科Y07003101217库尔班江·麦麦提语文72944.2-0.58全科Y07003101218阿卜杜萨拉木·艾比布拉语文733.7549-0.1全科Y07003101219艾则提艾力·毛拉艾麦提语文728.543.7-0.63全科Y07003101220艾散·色麦提语文723.2538.4-1.16全科Y07003101221艾散江·买买提敏语文733.7549-0.1全科Y07003101222穆海木德伊敏·阿卜杜热依木语文73045.2-0.48全科Y07003101223库德热提·居尔艾提语文736.551.70.17全科Y07003101224米日古丽·库尔班语文743.2558.50.85全科Y07003101225阿斯耶姆·穆萨语文729.2544.5-0.55全科Y07003101226罕佐热·阿布拉江语文741.556.70.67全科Y07003101227米热妮萨古丽·伊斯马依力语文74560.3 1.03全科Y07003101228古丽柯孜·马木提语文744.2559.50.95全科Y07003101229阿尔祖古丽·阿卜杜吾普尔语文73954.20.42全科Y07003101230麦尔耶木古丽·吾舒热语文74661.3 1.13全科Y07003101301茹柯耶·艾散江语文744.2559.50.95全科Y07003101302阿孜古丽·阿卜力米提语文73954.20.42全科Y07003101303热西代姆·艾麦提语文738.2553.40.34全科Y07003101304马热古丽·艾则孜语文74459.30.93全科Y07003101305古丽巴哈尔·托合提尼亚孜语文733.2548.5-0.15全科Y07003101306凯丽比努尔·艾拉语文750.7566.1 1.61全科Y07003101307阿依孜木古丽·艾麦提语文743.558.70.87全科Y07003101308古丽柯孜·阿卜杜哈力克语文738.75540.4全科Y07003101309阿尔孜古丽·托合提语文739.2554.50.45全科Y07003101310古丽斯坦·亚森语文737.7552.90.29全科Y07003101311阿迪莱·麦麦提敏语文738.553.70.37全科Y07003101312吐合尼木·赛丁语文74358.20.82全科Y07003101313阿依夏合·阿力木江语文74156.20.62全科Y07003101314谢姆西努尔·艾麦提语文737.7552.90.29全科Y07003101315茹克耶木·阿布力孜语文740.555.70.57全科Y07003101316努尔妮萨古丽·图尔贡语文739.2554.50.45全科Y07003101317孜拉拉·麦麦提汗语文743.558.70.87全科Y07003101318吾热古丽·麦麦提艾力语文733.7549-0.1全科Y07003101319努尔比耶姆·玉苏普语文742.557.70.77全科Y07003101320夏扎迪古丽·伊斯米提拉语文74156.20.62全科Y07003101321萨妮耶姆·斯依提艾麦提语文746.7562 1.2全科Y07003101322阿依夏·乌热依木语文73550.20.02全科Y07003101323麦威拉·奥布力喀斯木语文72540.2-0.98全科Y07003101324布再乃普.麦麦提敏语文73853.20.32全科Y07003101325阿卜杜萨拉木·阿卜杜克热木语文740.2555.50.55全科Y07003101326布威麦尔耶姆.吾热依木语文740.2555.50.55全科Y07003101327阿依谢.阿卜来提语文742.2557.50.75全科Y07003101328努尔阿丽耶.萨迪克语文737.2552.40.24全科Y07003101329米曼江.阿布力米提语文76075.4 2.54全科Y07003101330阿布都萨拉木.阿布都合力力语文733.7549-0.1全科Y07003101401买合里亚·穆合太尔语文74560.3 1.03全科Y07003101402玉苏普江·萨塔尔语文82843.2-0.68全科Y07003101403伊布拉依木·艾再木语文827.7542.9-0.71全科Y07003101404阿卜杜萨拉木·斯迪克语文819.534.6-1.54全科Y07003101405阿卜杜凯尤木·伊斯拉木语文843.558.70.87全科Y07003101406穆海麦提伊力·喀斯木语文83752.20.22全科Y07003101407伊卜拉伊木江·热伊木语文828.7543.9-0.61全科Y07003101408达吾提江·阿吾提语文826.541.7-0.83全科Y07003101409奥卜力喀斯木·阿卜杜米吉提语文830.7546-0.4全科Y07003101410阿卜杜热依木·艾麦提语文834.75500全科Y07003101411麦麦提热伊木·巴拉提语文842.557.70.77全科Y07003101412阿卜杜拉·阿比迪麦麦提语文825.540.7-0.93全科Y07003101413穆海麦迪·图尔迪语文830.545.7-0.43全科Y07003101414阿卜杜克热木·喀迪尔语文820.535.6-1.44全科Y07003101415热伊木江·巴亚吉语文81934.1-1.59全科Y07003101416伊米尔艾米孜·阿卜杜合力力语文827.542.7-0.73全科Y07003101417热孜叶木·阿卜来提语文84156.20.62全科Y07003101418艾拉古丽·库尔班语文839.2554.50.45全科Y07003101419热则耶姆古丽·阿卜杜拉语文838.553.70.37全科Y07003101420布帕提麦姆·木萨语文842.557.70.77全科Y07003101421古丽努尔·萨伍尔语文836.2551.40.14全科Y07003101422阿曼妮萨·热合曼语文842.557.70.77全科Y07003101423图尔吉古丽·尧力达什语文839.75550.5全科Y07003101424热孜耶·伊卜拉伊木语文844.2559.50.95全科Y07003101425吾热古丽·阿卜莱提语文83247.2-0.28全科Y07003101426苏比伊·努尔麦麦提语文846.561.8 1.18全科Y07003101427米热妮萨·麦麦提语文826.2541.4-0.86全科Y07003101428布麦尔耶木·克依木语文83449.3-0.07全科Y07003101429米那瓦尔·艾尼语文83449.3-0.07全科Y07003101430如库耶姆·奥卜力阿西木语文833.2548.5-0.15全科Y07003101501阿瓦古丽·阿布迪克热木语文847.2562.5 1.25全科Y07003101502米热班古丽·库尔班语文839.554.70.47全科Y07003101503玛伊热·色力木语文850.7566.1 1.61全科Y07003101504谢力排姆·吾吉语文85267.3 1.73全科Y07003101505布热比耶姆·阿布来提语文838.2553.40.34全科Y07003101506努尔比耶姆·艾尔肯语文846.2561.5 1.15全科Y07003101507阿瓦古丽·玉苏普语文83449.3-0.07全科Y07003101508伊玛妮古丽·吾加麦提语文835.2550.40.04全科Y07003101509布再尼甫·如则语文83651.20.12全科Y07003101510阿依加玛丽·海力排提语文832.547.7-0.23全科Y07003101511阿依古丽·阿卜来提语文83954.20.42全科Y07003101512阿依妮萨古丽·麦麦提语文831.7547-0.3全科Y07003101513伊米古荪·阿卜杜喀迪尔语文831.546.7-0.33全科Y07003101514阿依其曼·萨迪热语文828.2543.4-0.66全科Y07003101515苏买牙·阿迪力语文826.541.7-0.83全科Y07003101516努尔艾合麦提·阿卜杜克热木语文822.2537.4-1.26全科Y07003101518努尔阿米尼·喀迪尔语文821.2536.4-1.36全科Y07003101519塞普拉·阿卜力则语文824.2539.4-1.06全科Y07003101520依布拉依木·阿布都热衣木语文833.2548.5-0.15全科Y07003101521阿迪力江·吾卜力喀斯木语文821.2536.4-1.36全科Y07003101522伊卜拉尹·阿卜杜敏语文822.2537.4-1.26全科Y07003101523热则耶·吾拉木语文833.548.7-0.13全科Y07003101524谢伊代·亚库普语文83247.2-0.28全科Y07003101525阿卜杜萨拉木·阿卜杜克热木语文922.2537.4-1.26全科Y07003101526吾舒尔·麦麦提敏语文925.7540.9-0.91全科Y07003101527阿力普·阿吉语文921.7536.9-1.31全科Y07003101528热合木吐拉买买吐荪语文92540.2-0.98全科Y07003101530阿卜杜拉·买买提艾力语文9 6.7521.7-2.83全科Y07003101601迪力亚尔·阿卜力米提语文918.2533.3-1.67全科Y07003101602阿卜杜克依木·阿卜杜哈力克语文92136.1-1.39全科Y07003101603肖合热提·阿卜迪热合曼语文91833.1-1.69全科Y07003101604库纳洪·阿卜杜瓦斯提语文923.538.6-1.14全科Y07003101605阿巴拜克日·阿卜杜热合曼语文92136.1-1.39全科Y07003101606木再排尔·米吉提语文92237.1-1.29全科Y07003101608阿卜杜外力·努尔麦麦提语文915.530.6-1.94全科Y07003101609麦麦提江·艾科拜尔语文929.544.7-0.53全科Y07003101610如孜·居麦语文926.541.7-0.83全科Y07003101611孜比卜拉·阿卜杜纳斯语文912.2527.3-2.27全科Y07003101612穆海麦提·克热木语文91934.1-1.59全科Y07003101613阿卜力克木·吐拉克语文931.2546.5-0.35全科Y07003101614伊木然·麦麦提热依木语文916.531.6-1.84全科Y07003101615阿卜杜力艾则孜·麦麦提语文916.531.6-1.84全科Y07003101616伊马木穆海麦提·阿布迪伟力语文91429-2.1全科Y07003101617依比热依木·努尔麦麦提语文938.2553.40.34全科Y07003101618买尔旦江·肉孜语文917.2532.3-1.77全科Y07003101619喀吾力·图尔荪语文99.524.5-2.55全科Y07003101620阿卜杜拉·达伍提语文916.531.6-1.84全科Y07003101621阿卜杜克尤木·图尔荪语文911.526.5-2.35全科Y07003101622阿卜拉·玉苏云语文98.523.5-2.65全科Y07003101623阿依提拉·喀日语文91732.1-1.79全科Y07003101624热西代姆·托合提语文92035.1-1.49全科Y07003101625努尔比耶·约麦尔艾力语文936.551.70.17全科Y07003101626古丽柯孜·阿卜力孜语文93247.2-0.28全科Y07003101627托合提古丽·排塔尔语文923.2538.4-1.16全科Y07003101628热萨来提姑丽·艾则孜语文930.7546-0.4全科Y07003101629茹克耶姆·阿布都热合曼语文922.537.6-1.24全科Y07003101630阿斯亚·喀热语文92742.2-0.78全科Y07003101701阿依孜姆古丽·图尔贡语文928.543.7-0.63全科Y07003101702热衣莱姆·玉苏普语文929.544.7-0.53全科Y07003101703玛日伊米古丽·阿卜杜热扎克语文927.7542.9-0.71全科Y07003101704阿尔祖古丽·喀斯木语文93146.2-0.38。
