静脉应用脂肪乳剂指南
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:217.99 KB
- 文档页数:2
脂肪乳抢救方案—治疗因局麻药中毒导致的心跳骤停如果局麻药中毒导致的心跳骤停对标准治疗无效,除了标准的心肺复苏外,还应该静脉给予20%脂肪乳,给药方案如下:1分钟内给予20%脂肪乳1.5ml/kg然后以0.25ml/kg/min持续静脉输注持续胸外心脏按压(有助于脂肪乳进入血液循环)等3—5分钟重复给予负荷剂量达到3ml/kg直至自主循环恢复在自主循环回复以后需要继续静脉输入直到循环稳定,如果出现血压下降则增加输注速度到0.5ml/kg/min建议最大剂量为8ml/kg以治疗一个体重70 kg的病人为例准备一袋500ml 20%的脂肪乳和一个50ml的空针抽一支50ml的脂肪乳立即静注,共两次将脂肪乳剂连接到输液装置,在15min内静脉滴注如果自主循环没恢复,重复初始的负荷剂量两次[据《Anesthesia &Anslgesia》2009年4月报道]题:布比卡因中毒导致心跳骤停应用脂肪乳剂复苏后再中毒一例(作者Marwick PC.等)33岁男性患者(72kg,168cm)行右上臂开放骨折清创术。
患者术前生命体征平稳,常规检查无异常。
采用神经电刺激仪引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞。
缓慢(3分钟以上)注射0.375%布比卡因(不含肾上腺素)30ml,以5ml为间隔判断是否误入血管。
患者忽诉咽眼干涩,立刻停止注射局麻药并拔出神经刺激针。
随后患者发生全身抽搐和呼吸停止,面罩间歇正压机械通气给予纯氧。
静注硫喷妥钠100mg后60s 内抽搐终止,随后追加150mg。
此时心电图显示心动过速。
可达160次/分,90秒后继发QRS波幅增宽,心率变慢并停止。
150ml脂肪乳剂正好在心跳停止前开始输,约90s输注完毕。
同时进行心脏按压和气管插管,静注肾上腺素1mg,心肺复苏期间,记录到呼末二氧化碳为19mmHg。
脂肪乳剂输注完毕后3分钟内,患者心跳恢复,心率达130次/分,动脉血压160/120mmHg,呼末二氧化碳61mmHg,氧饱和度100%。
发生。
而这些疾病的转归又与黏膜纤毛运动功能的改善有关。
因此检查鼻、鼻窦黏膜纤毛运动功能将有助于对某些鼻部疾病病因的探讨,并对指导用药、判定病情和疗效有重要意义。
目前常用的判断黏膜纤毛运动功能的指标是测量黏膜纤毛传输(mucociliar y transport ,M CT )速度和纤毛振动频率(ciliar y beat frequency ,CBF )。
后者近年来在方法学上有较大进展,但需要相差显微镜等特殊的设备,操作复杂。
而测M CT 速度比较方便,临床上多用于判断术后效果。
一般的方法都是测量鼻腔的M CT 速度而间接推算窦腔的M CT 速度,本研究是用活性炭粉末直接测量窦腔的M CT 速度,故更准确。
由于活性炭粉末重量轻、显示清楚、取材方便、操作简单,可用于测量上颌窦黏膜纤毛运动。
虽然全麻对黏膜纤毛运动有影响,但这个影响是整体性的,故对说明问题影响不大。
由于黏膜纤毛不能在空气中活动,所以纤毛细胞表面的黏液毯是绝对必要的。
呼吸道表面的黏液毯分两层,上层为凝胶层,下层为溶胶层,亦称纤毛周围液。
纤毛在溶胶层内可自由摆动[3]。
纤毛摆动有两个相,在/效验相0,纤毛强直向上,此时纤毛顶端接触凝胶层,产生推力;在/恢复相0,纤毛弯曲。
纤毛的振动可以推动黏液毯向后不断移动,而纤毛的生理活动又有赖于黏液毯的质量。
为了促使鼻窦炎术后黏膜功能尽快恢复,除了保持窦口引流畅通、控制炎症、减轻水肿、抑制变态反应外,使用一些促进黏膜纤毛功能恢复的药物在临床上也已引起共识,常用的药物有盐酸氨溴索、标准桃金娘油(商品名吉诺通)等。
由于标准桃金娘油无针剂,动物使用不方便,故选用盐酸氨溴索针剂作为黏膜纤毛运动增强剂。
实验中使用该药动物无不良反应,使用1个月后,统计结果显示两组M CT 速度有非常显著性差异(P <0101),盐酸氨溴索注入组明显高于不注入组。
分析其机制可能与以下几方面有关。
盐酸氨溴索具有刺激肺泡表面活性物质合成和分泌,以及活化黏膜纤毛上皮的作用。
脂肪乳注射液脂肪乳注射液是由精制大豆油、甘油、精制卵磷脂等制成的静脉输注用脂肪乳剂。
本品为非肠道给养下提供高能量和必需的脂肪酸。
临床上用于手术前后、肿瘤、长期昏迷等不能进食或大面积烧伤等需要补充脂肪营养的病人或婴儿。
该品为白色不透明的静脉输注用脂肪乳剂。
【中文名称】脂肪乳注射液(C14-24)【英文名称】Fat Emulsion Injection每1000ml 10%脂肪乳注射液内含:精制大豆油 100g;甘油 25g;精制卵磷脂 12g;注射用水加至 1000ml 【主要成分】本品系由注射用大豆油经注射用卵磷脂乳化并加注射用甘油制成的灭菌乳状液体。
每1000ml含:10% 20% 30%注射用大豆油100g 200g 300g注射用卵磷脂12g 12g 12g注射用甘油22g 22g 16.7g注射用水(加至) 1000ml 1000ml 1000mlpH值约为8 8 8渗透压(mosm/kg·H2O)300 350 310能量MJ(kcal) 4.6(1100) 8.4(2000) 12.6(3000)【性状】LipofundinMCT/LCT为经无菌处理,不含致热原,经静脉输注的脂肪乳剂。
【药理毒理】中链甘油三酯比长链甘油三酯能更快地从血中清除,并更快地氧化功能,因此更适合为机体提供能量,尤其适合那些因肉毒碱转运酶缺乏或活性降低而不能利用长链甘油三酯的患者。
多不饱和脂肪酸由长链甘油三酯提供,防止因必需脂肪酸缺乏所出现的症状。
卵磷脂中含有磷,为生物膜结构的组成成分,用于保证膜的流动性和生物学功能。
甘油参与体内能量代谢,或合成糖原和脂肪。
规格:250ml:50g(大豆油):3g(卵磷脂)特性该品为静脉输注用的乳剂,含有用精制卵磷脂乳化的精制大豆油,其中大约60%的脂肪酸是必需脂肪酸,其粒子大小和生物物质与天然乳糜微粒相似。
脂肪乳是一种由精制大豆油和精制卵磷脂所组成的既均匀又稳定的脂肪乳剂,它治疗的重要性在于非肠道给养下提供高能量和必需的脂肪酸。
丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳注射液【成份】本品主要成份为丙泊酚,其化学名称为2,6-二异丙基苯酚化学结构式:分子式:C12H18O分子量:178.3所用辅料包括大豆油、中链甘油三酯、纯化卵磷脂、甘油、油酸、氢氧化钠和注射用水。
【性状】本品为白色均匀乳状液体。
【适应症】全身麻醉诱导和维持。
重症监护患者辅助通气治疗时的镇静。
单独或与局部麻醉药联合使用,用于诊断和手术过程中的镇静。
【规格】(1)20ml:0.2g(2)50ml:0.5g(3)100ml:1.0g。
【用法用量】本品只能在医院或有合适设备的门诊由经过麻醉训练的医生使用或在重症监护病房使用。
使用本品时,所用设备应在麻醉下能够处理突发事件,复苏设备应能伸手可及,呼吸与循环功能应被监控(如心电图,脉搏血氧饱和度仪)。
本品作为手术和诊断过程中的镇静用药,不得由实施该手术或诊断的人给药。
应根据病人反应及术前用药实行个体化给药。
麻醉时除了使用本品外,一般还应补充镇痛药。
■剂量成人麻醉: 麻醉诱导:本品应采用滴定法实施麻醉诱导(每10秒约20~40mg),直到临床体征显示麻醉作用已经产生。
大多数小于55岁的成人诱导剂量按体重计为1.5~2.5mg/kg。
超过55岁的成人以及ASA III-IV患者,特别是心功能不全的患者,需要量也明显减少,总剂量最低可到1mg/kg。
给药速度应更加缓慢(每10秒约20mg)。
麻醉维持:可通过连续静脉输注或重复单次注射本品来维持麻醉深度。
连续静脉输注时,给药剂量和速度必须个体化,常规剂量按体重计每小时4~12mg/kg,在应激小的手术过程中,如微创手术,可将维持剂量减至按体重每小时4mg/kg。
对于老年人、一般状态不稳定或低血容量及ASA Ⅲ-Ⅳ患者,建议根据病人病情的严重程度以及麻醉技术的不同,可以更进一步减少用量。
重复单次静脉注射给药时,建议单次剂量为25~50mg。
快速单次静脉注射给药(单次或重复)不能用于老年人,因为这可能导致心肺功能抑制。
脂肪乳剂的临床应用及注意事项脂肪乳剂是临床常用的静脉营养药物,可提供人体营养所需的能量和必需脂肪酸,如亚麻酸和亚油酸。
脂肪乳剂适用于需要高能量、肾损害、禁用蛋白质的患者和由于某种原因不能经胃肠道摄取食物的患者,主要用于大手术前后不能进食、严重能量消耗、慢性腹泻、大面积烧伤、恶性肿瘤、严重营养缺乏、必需脂肪酸缺乏等症状的治疗。
作为现代肠外营养治疗的标志性产品,脂肪乳剂对临床许多无法正常摄食的患者的良性转归具有重要作用。
脂肪乳剂按其中三酞甘油所结合的脂肪酸链的长短分为长链三酰甘油脂肪乳剂(LCT)和中链三酞甘油脂肪乳剂(M CT)。
将一定比例的中链和长链脂肪乳通过物理混合形成物理混合型中/长链脂肪乳剂(LCT/M CT)。
目前,国内临床使用的主要为此类脂肪乳剂。
1 脂肪乳剂的研究进展以大豆油为原料得到LCT自1964年问世以来,在临床广泛应用。
但研究发现,LCT 能提供过量的多不饱和脂肪酸,致使脂肪酸的构成出现异常,增加过氧化,并造成二十碳类衍生物的生成失衡。
因此,研究者们致力于新制剂的开发,研制出了结构型中/长链脂肪乳,含多不饱和脂肪酸、橄榄油或深海鱼油的脂肪乳新制剂,它们各有其优点,除了提供能量及必需脂肪酸外,还具有一定的药理作用。
如结构型中/长链脂肪乳更有利于改善氮平衡,并可增加处于应激状态术后患者的脂肪氧化,比LCT易于被清除。
含深海鱼油的脂肪乳富含ω-3脂肪酸,有一定的调节免疫和减轻炎症反应的作用,主要用于创伤和手术后患者、全身炎症反应综合征、炎性肠道疾病和支气管哮喘。
含橄榄油的脂肪乳富含α-生育酚,可减少过氧化作用的发生,并有利于降低脂肪乳过氧化的敏感性。
目前最新的脂肪乳是由大豆油、鱼油、MCT、橄榄油及维生素E物理混合而成,这种脂肪乳严格按照国家健康协会推荐的比例配制,可抗炎性反应,调节机体免疫功能,明显缩短患者的住院时间。
2 脂肪乳剂的临床应用脂肪乳剂的基本原料无毒性,乳化后所形成的脂肪微粒与天然乳糜极相似,具有能量密度大、溶液为等渗性、无利尿作用和代谢率不下降等优点。
ACMT Position Statement:Guidance for the Use of Intravenous Lipid EmulsionAmerican College of Medical ToxicologyReceived:25March2016/Accepted:6April2016#American College of Medical Toxicology2016Keywords Toxicology.Lipid emulsion.Intralipid.Lipid resuscitationThe purpose of this document is to discuss the parenteral use of intravenous lipid emulsion(ILE)with the intent of reducing the clinical manifestations of toxicity from excessive doses of certain medications.Authors have suggested that ILE in-creases inotropy,augments mitochondrial fatty acid metabo-lism,and creates a B lipid sink,^decreasing the bioavailability of lipid-soluble medications[1].This therapy has shown some promising results in poison-ing by lipid-soluble cardiotoxic medications[2–6].The data from experience with poisoned humans is anecdotal and mixed,although they do suggest that ILE may be beneficial in select circumstances[7,8].However,authors have reported the following in associating with ILE:lipemic interference with laboratory studies,pancreatitis(usually mild),acute re-spiratory distress syndrome,and reduction in effectiveness of other antidotes[9,10].The decision to initiate ILE is solely discretionary and is based on the clinical judgment of the treating physician.The2015American Heart Association Guidelines state B it may be reasonable to administer[ILE], concomitant with standard resuscitative care,to patients with local anesthetic systemic toxicity and particularly to patients who have premonitory neurotoxicity^from bupivacaine (Class IIb)and that B it may be reasonable to administer [ILE]to patients with other forms of drug toxicity who are failing standard resuscitative measures[11].^Given the uncertainty of its beneficial effect in human poi-sonings,it is the opinion of the American College of Medical Toxicology that there are no standard of care requirements to use,or to choose not to use,ILE.However,in circumstances where there is serious hemodynamic,or other,instability from a xenobiotic with a high degree of lipid solubility,ILE is viewed as a reasonable consideration for therapy.If ILE is used,it should be instituted for patients with hemodynamic instability or seizures who are not responsive to standard re-suscitation measures,such as fluid replacement,inotropes, and vasopressors,where appropriate.The decision to use ILE instead of,or in conjunction with,other therapies that have been anecdotally reported to be effective,such as high-dose insulin,is to be based on the clinical judgment of the treating physician.Where possible,it is recommended that these therapies be administered in consultation with a medical toxicologist.There are no validated,evidence-based dosing regimens. The American Heart Association described a1.5mL/kg bolus followed by a0.25mL/kg/min infusion,continued for30–60minutes to a maximum infusion of10mL/kg[11]. recommends repeating this initial bolus one to two times for persistent B cardiovascular collapse,^raising the infusion rate to0.5mL/kg/min for persistent hypotension, and limiting the total dose to10–12mL/kg over the first 30minutes[2].Additional dosing recommendations include a loading dose of1.5mL/kg,followed by3–5minutes of infusion at0.25mL/kg,and then a maintenance infusion of 0.025mg/kg/min[9].This lower infusion rate may be suffi-cient to maintain the positive effects of lipids while avoiding lipid overload.*American College of Medical Toxicology positionstatements@1ACMT,Phoenix,AZ,USARecommended GuidelineGiven the uncertainty of its beneficial effect in human poison-ings,it is the opinion of the American College of Medical Toxicology that there are no standard of care requirements to use,or to choose not to use,ILE.However,in circumstances where there is serious hemodynamic,or other,instability from a xenobiotic with a high degree of lipid solubility,ILE is viewed as a reasonable consideration for therapy.If the decision is made to initiate ILE,the following guide-line is recommended.This suggested guideline is a modifica-tion of the one posted on .However,it is completely appropriate if the treating physician,based on his/her clinical judgment or other authoritative recommenda-tions,chooses to alter the manner in which ILE is administered.1)A20%lipid emulsion(e.g.,Intralipid)should be admin-istered as a1.5mL/kg bolus.The bolus should be admin-istered over2–3minutes.A repeat bolus can be consid-ered if there is a failed response to the first bolus.2)The bolus may be followed immediately by an infusion of20%lipid emulsion at a rate of0.25mL/kg/min.After 3minutes of this infusion rate,response to the bolus and initial infusion should be assessed.If there has been a significant response,the infusion rate may be adjusted to0.025mL/kg/min(i.e.,1/10the initial rate)[9].This recommendation is based on concerns for adverse effects from extremely high cumulative rates of lipid infusion, and a desire to be able to monitor the impact of initial therapy in a dynamic enteral overdose situation.Blood pressure,heart rate,and other available hemodynamic parameters should be recorded at least every15minutes during the infusion.3)If there is an initial response to the bolus followed by there-emergence of instability during the lowest-dose infu-sion,the infusion rate could be increased back to0.25mL/kg/min or,in severe cases,the bolus could berepeated.There is no known maximal dose,but other authors have suggested a maximum dose of10mL/kg.This guideline has been reviewed and approved by the ACMT Board of Directors.Disclosure statements for partici-pating members of the ACMT Board of Directors are avail-able.While the opinions of individual practitioners may differ,this is the position of the College at the time written,after a review of the issue and pertinent literature. Acknowledgments ACMT would like to acknowledge Members of the Position Statement and Guidelines Committee for authorship of this state-ment:Andrew Stolbach(Chair),Jeffrey Brent,Peter Chase,Howard Greller,Ronald Kirschner,Charles McKay,Thomas Kurt,Lewis Nelson,Sean Rhyee,Silas Smith,Brandon Warrick.Compliance with Ethical StandardConflicts of Interest None.Sources of Funding None.References1.Ozcan MS,Weinberg G.Intravenous lipid emulsion for the treat-ment of drug toxicity.J Intensive Care Med.2014;29:59–70.2.LipidRescue(TM)Resuscitation…For Drug Toxicity.http:///.Accessed30Dec20153.Cave G,Harvey M.Intravenous lipid emulsion as antidote beyondlocal anesthetic toxicity:a systematic review.Acad Emerg Med.2009;16:815–24.4.Cave G,Harvey M,Willers J,Uncles D,Meek T,Picard J,et al.LIPAEMIC report:results of clinical use of intravenous lipid emul-sion in drug toxicity reported to an online lipid registry.J Med Toxicol.2014;10:133–42.5.Eren Cevik S,Tasyurek T,Guneysel O.Intralipid emulsion treat-ment as an antidote in lipophilic drug intoxications.Am J Emerg Med.2014;32:1103–8.6.Meaney CJ,Sareh H,Hayes BD,Gonzales JP.Intravenous lipidemulsion in the management of amlodipine overdose.Hosp Pharm.2013;48:848–54.7.Levine M,Hoffman RS,Lavergne V,Stork CM,Graudins A,Chuang R,et al.Systematic review of the effect of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for non-local anesthetics toxicity.Clin Toxicol.2016;54:194–221.8.Hoegberg LCG,Bania TC,Lavergne V,et al.Systematic review ofthe effect of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for local anesthetic toxicity.Clin Toxicol.2016;54:167–93.9.Fettiplace MR,Akpa BS,Rubinstein I,Weinberg G.Confusionabout infusion:rational volume limits for intravenous lipid emul-sion during treatment of oral overdoses.Ann Emerg Med.2015;66: 185–8.10.Levine M,Skolnik AB,Ruha A-M,Bosak A,Menke N,Pizon AF.Complications following antidotal use of intravenous lipid emul-sion therapy.J Med Toxicol.2014;10:10–4.vonas EJ,Drennan IR,Gabrielli A,Heffner AC,Hoyte CO,Orkin AM,et al.Part10:special circumstances of resuscitation.Circulation.2015;132:S501–18.J.Med.Toxicol.。