英国脱欧--英语演讲

英国退欧英语作文Brexit, short for "British exit," refers to the United Kingdom's decision to leave the European Union. The decision was made through a referendum held on June 23, 2016, in which 51.9% of the participating voters chose to leave the EU.There were several reasons behind the Brexit vote. Oneof the main factors was immigration. Many British citizens were concerned about the increasing number of immigrants from other EU countries entering the UK, which they believed was putting a strain on public services and job opportunities. Another factor was the desire for greater sovereignty and independence. Some felt that EU regulations and laws were infringing upon the UK's ability to govern itself.The aftermath of the Brexit vote has been complex and challenging. The UK officially left the EU on January 31, 2020, entering a transition period that lasted until December 31, 2020. During this time, the UK and the EU negotiated the terms of their future relationship,including trade, security, and immigration.The impact of Brexit has been significant. Economically, the UK's departure from the EU has led to trade disruptions, increased costs for businesses, and uncertainty for investors. Many industries, such as finance and manufacturing, have been particularly affected. Politically, Brexit has caused rifts within the UK and strained its relationships with EU member states. There have also been concerns about the potential impact on peace and stabilityin Northern Ireland.Looking ahead, the long-term consequences of Brexit remain to be seen. The UK and the EU continue to navigate their new relationship, and both sides are seeking to minimize the negative effects of Brexit. However, it isclear that Brexit has fundamentally changed the dynamics of Europe and will continue to shape the UK's future for years to come.英国退欧，简称“脱欧”，是指英国决定离开欧盟的决定。

英国脱欧历程英语作文高中The Brexit Process in the UK。

The Brexit process has been a long and complicated journey for the United Kingdom. It all started with a referendum in 2016, in which the British people voted to leave the European Union (EU). Since then, the UK has been negotiating the terms of its departure from the EU, and the process has been fraught with challenges and setbacks.The referendum result came as a shock to many, both in the UK and abroad. It was a narrow victory for the Leave campaign, with 52% of voters choosing to leave the EU and 48% choosing to remain. The result exposed deep divisions within British society, with some regions and demographics strongly in favor of Brexit, while others were strongly opposed.The government then triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which began the formal process of leaving the EU.This started a two-year countdown clock, during which time the UK and the EU were supposed to negotiate the terms of their future relationship. However, the negotiations have been anything but smooth.One of the major sticking points has been the issue of the Irish border. The UK and the EU have both committed to avoiding a hard border between Northern Ireland (which is part of the UK) and the Republic of Ireland (which is an EU member state). However, finding a solution that satisfies both sides has proved elusive.Another major issue has been the future trading relationship between the UK and the EU. The EU has insisted that the UK cannot have the same benefits of membership as a non-member state, and has demanded that the UK accept certain conditions in order to access the EU's single market. The UK, on the other hand, has argued that it should be able to negotiate its own trade deals with other countries and not be bound by EU rules.The negotiations have also been complicated bypolitical instability in the UK. The Conservative government, which triggered the Brexit process, hasstruggled to maintain a united front on the issue. In 2019, Prime Minister Theresa May resigned after failing to gether Brexit deal through Parliament, and was replaced byBoris Johnson. Johnson then negotiated a new deal with the EU, but faced significant opposition in Parliament and was unable to secure its approval.Finally, in January 2020, the UK officially left the EU. However, this was not the end of the story. The UK and the EU then entered a transition period, during which time they were supposed to negotiate the details of their future relationship. This period was due to end on December 31, 2020, but was extended by a few weeks to allow for further negotiations.In the end, the UK and the EU did manage to reach atrade deal before the end of the transition period. Thedeal covers issues such as trade, security, and cooperation in areas such as science and education. However, it is afar cry from the close relationship that the UK enjoyedwith the EU as a member state. The UK has lost its access to the EU's single market and customs union, and there will be new barriers to trade and travel between the UK and the EU.In conclusion, the Brexit process has been a long and difficult journey for the UK. It has exposed deep divisions within British society and raised questions about the country's future relationship with its European neighbors. While the UK has now left the EU, the consequences of this decision will be felt for years to come.。

英国退出欧盟英文作文英文：Brexit, the decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, has been a topic of great controversy and debate. As a citizen of the UK, I have mixed feelings about this decision.On one hand, I understand the desire for independence and sovereignty. The EU has become increasingly bureaucratic and many feel that decisions are made without considering the needs of individual member states. Additionally, the UK has always had a strong sense of national identity and many feel that being part of the EU takes away from that.However, on the other hand, I worry about the economic consequences of Brexit. The UK has been a member of the EU for over 40 years and leaving will have significant impacts on trade and investment. It may also lead to job losses andeconomic instability.Overall, I think that Brexit is a complex issue with both positives and negatives. It is important for the UK to maintain strong relationships with our European neighbors and work towards a mutually beneficial solution.中文：英国脱欧，即英国决定退出欧盟，一直是一个备受争议和辩论的话题。

英国脱欧历程英语作文Title: The Brexit Journey: A Comprehensive Overview。

The Brexit saga has been a monumental journey for the United Kingdom, marked by twists, turns, and significant implications for both domestic and international affairs. This essay aims to provide a detailed exploration of the Brexit process, from its inception to its aftermath.Introduction:The decision for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, commonly referred to as Brexit, was a momentous event that followed a divisive referendum in 2016. With a narrow majority, British voters chose to depart from the EU, setting off a complex and protracted process that would dominate political discourse for years to come.Origins of Brexit:The roots of Brexit can be traced back to longstanding debates within British society regarding sovereignty, immigration, and the perceived erosion of national identity. Euroscepticism had simmered in the UK for decades, with some factions advocating for a complete withdrawal from the EU. The referendum in 2016 provided a platform for these sentiments to be expressed, leading to a narrow butdecisive outcome in favor of leaving the EU.Negotiation Period:Following the referendum, the UK government, underPrime Minister Theresa May, initiated the formal process of exiting the EU by triggering Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. This set a two-year deadline for negotiations onthe terms of withdrawal. However, reaching a satisfactory agreement proved to be immensely challenging, with contentious issues such as the Irish border, trade relations, and the rights of EU citizens in the UK needingto be addressed.The negotiations were characterized by intense debate,deadlock, and multiple extensions to the deadline. Prime Minister May's proposed withdrawal agreement faced significant opposition both within her own party and in Parliament, leading to a series of parliamentary defeats and a lack of consensus on the way forward.Transition Period and Agreement:Amidst the political turmoil, Boris Johnson succeeded Theresa May as Prime Minister and vowed to deliver Brexit by the new deadline of January 31, 2020. After further negotiations, an agreement was reached between the UK and the EU, known as the Withdrawal Agreement. This agreement outlined the terms of the UK's departure, including a transition period during which existing arrangements would remain in place while a new relationship was negotiated.Brexit Day and Aftermath:On January 31, 2020, the UK officially left the EU, marking the culmination of years of debate and uncertainty. However, this was not the end of the Brexit story, butrather the beginning of a new chapter. The transition period provided a temporary buffer, allowing businesses and individuals to adjust to the new reality of life outside the EU.The impact of Brexit has been multifaceted and far-reaching. Economically, the UK experienced both short-term disruptions and long-term consequences as trade relations shifted, supply chains adjusted, and financial markets reacted to the change. Politically, Brexit has reshaped the landscape of British politics, leading to changes in party dynamics, electoral outcomes, and the devolution debate within the UK.Conclusion:In conclusion, the Brexit journey has been a defining moment in the history of the United Kingdom, with implications that extend far beyond its borders. From the origins of Euroscepticism to the complexities of negotiation and the aftermath of departure, Brexit has tested the resilience of institutions, communities, andindividuals. While the full consequences of Brexit may not yet be fully realized, it is clear that its legacy will continue to shape the trajectory of the UK and its place in the world for years to come.。

Brexit: Impact, Challenges, and FutureProspectsThe decision of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union, commonly referred to as Brexit, has been a significant political and economic event that has rocked the global landscape. Since the referendum in 2016, which saw a narrow majority vote for leaving the EU, the process of disentangling the UK's intricate economic and political ties with the continent has been fraught with challenges and complexities.On the surface, Brexit was seen as a vote of dissatisfaction with the perceived bureaucraticinterference of the EU and a desire to reclaim sovereignty. However, the deeper implications of this decision are far more complex and multifaceted. The economic impact ofBrexit has been significant, with concerns ranging from trade disruptions to financial instability. The UK's status as a global financial hub has been threatened, and the country's access to the EU's vast single market has been compromised.Moreover, Brexit has also exposed the deep-seated divisions within British society. The debate surroundingthe referendum highlighted the north-south divide, with areas traditionally aligned with industrial manufacturing and a stronger working-class presence voting overwhelmingly for Brexit, while the more affluent and service-oriented south tended to favor remaining in the EU. This divide has persisted even after the formal withdrawal, leading to questions about the UK's national identity and unity.The political landscape has also been transformed by Brexit. The Conservative Party, which campaigned for Brexit, has faced internal divisions and leadership crises as it struggles to implement the withdrawal agreement. Opposition parties, particularly the Labour Party, have beencriticized for their ambiguous stance on Brexit, which has eroded their voter base.Internationally, Brexit has had ripple effects acrossthe globe. The EU, which has been grappling with its own identity and unity issues, has been forced to reevaluateits role and influence on the world stage. Meanwhile, other countries have watched the UK's experiment with caution,mindful of the potential risks and uncertainties associated with similar moves.Looking ahead, the future prospects for Brexit are uncertain. The UK and the EU are still negotiating theterms of their future relationship, with areas such as trade, security, and migration remaining contentious issues. The UK's ability to forge new trade deals and maintain its economic competitiveness will be crucial in determining its future prosperity.Despite the challenges and uncertainties, Brexit also presents opportunities for the UK to reshape its globalrole and identity. It can use this moment of transition to invest in domestic industries, foster innovation, and strengthen its ties with other non-EU partners. However,this will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including political leaders, businesses, and the public, to work towards a common vision for the country's future.In conclusion, Brexit is not just a political or economic event; it is a societal and cultural phenomenonthat has reshaped the UK's relationship with the world. While the initial fallout has been significant, the long-term impact of Brexit remains to be seen. It is a complex and evolving story that continues to captivate the attention of the world.**英国退欧：影响、挑战与未来前景**英国决定退出欧洲联盟（简称退欧或英国退欧），这一事件在全球格局中引发了重大政治和经济震动。

英国脱欧！首相卡梅伦发布辞职演讲（双语字幕）这两天，一直在说英国脱欧公投。

当地时间24日6时，英国公布了“脱欧”公投的最终结果：英国脱离欧盟。

公投结果公布后，卡梅伦发表了辞职讲话，大家赶紧看起来~~Prime Minister David Cameron is to step down by October after the UK voted to leave the European Union.英国首相卡梅伦在英国公投决定脱欧后将于十月辞去首相职务。

在这场演讲中他说道：'The British people have voted to leave the EU and their will must be respected.“英国人民已经投票选择离开欧盟，他们的选择应该受到尊重。

The will of the British people is an instruction that must be delivered.英国人民的意愿是必须得到遵从的指令。

There can be no doubt about the result.这样的结果毋庸置疑。

Across the world people have been watching the choice that Britain has made.全世界人民都在关注着英国人民的选择。

This will require strong, determined and committed leadership.这样的选择需要强大的、决断的、坚定的领导人。

I am very proud to have been Prime Minister of this country for six years.能够担任六年英国首相我深感荣幸。

I have held nothing back.我毫无保留。

The british people have made a very clear decision to英国人民已经做出了明确的选择。

英国脱欧英文作文英文：Brexit has been a controversial topic since the referendum in 2016. I personally think that the decision to leave the European Union was a mistake. It has caused a lot of uncertainty and economic instability in the UK.One of the main reasons for Brexit was to regaincontrol over immigration. However, this has not been the case. The UK is still facing immigration issues, and leaving the EU has made it harder for UK citizens to travel and work in Europe.Another issue is the impact on trade. The UK will no longer have access to the single market, which will make it harder for businesses to trade with Europe. This could lead to job losses and a decline in the UK economy.Furthermore, Brexit has caused division and tensionwithin the UK. Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to remain in the EU, and there are now calls for independence. The Brexit process has also highlighted the political divide between the north and south of England.In conclusion, I believe that Brexit was a mistake. It has caused more problems than it has solved, and the long-term consequences are uncertain.中文：英国脱欧自2016年公投以来一直是一个备受争议的话题。

英国脱欧英语作文英文回答：Brexit, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, has been a hot topic for years. It has brought about significant changes and challenges for both the UK and the EU. As a British citizen, I have witnessed firsthand the impact of Brexit on our economy, politics, and society.One of the most noticeable effects of Brexit is the changes in trade and business. Many companies in the UK have faced uncertainties and disruptions in their trade with the EU. For example, my friend who owns a small business that exports goods to the EU has had to deal with new customs procedures and tariffs, which have increased the cost and complexity of doing business. This has put a strain on his company's finances and operations.Another area that has been affected by Brexit isimmigration. The UK's departure from the EU has led to changes in immigration policies and the status of EU citizens living in the UK. I have a colleague who is from Poland and has been living in the UK for many years. She had to apply for settled status to ensure that she can continue to live and work in the UK after Brexit. The uncertainty and bureaucracy surrounding the application process have caused her a lot of stress and anxiety.Furthermore, Brexit has also had political and social implications. The issue of Brexit has divided the country and has led to heated debates and disagreements among the public. People have strong opinions on whether Brexit is beneficial or detrimental to the UK. This has created a sense of division and polarization in our society, which has made it challenging to have constructive conversations about the future of our country.中文回答：脱欧，即英国退出欧洲联盟，多年来一直是热门话题。

UK Votes to Leave EU英国公投退欧On June 24, in a historic referendum known as Brexit, the UK voted to leave the European Union (EU). Shortly after the Leave results were confirmed, the British pound began to fall drastically, and Prime Minister Cameron announced that he would be stepping down. Like Cameron, all of the other EU leaders had hoped that voters would choose to Remain. The process to officially leave the EU is expected to take at least two years. The next prime minister will likely take care of the negotiations.6月24日，英国举行具有历史意义的“Brexit”公投，英国选择离开欧盟。

就在“退欧”公投后不久，英镑急转直下，英国首相卡梅伦宣布辞职。

正如卡梅伦以及欧盟领导人一样，都希望英国留欧。

正式退欧进程恐将至少持续两年。

下任总统将有可能处理谈判事宜。

n 23 June, the UK finally settled the question that's been rumbling close to the surface of British politics for a generation: should the country remain within the European Union or go it alone. The final result went 52 to 48 per cent in favour of Brexit - so what are the pros and cons of leaving the European Union?How we got hereThe Conservative's general election victory last year activated a manifesto pledge to hold a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union by the end of 2017.David Cameron made the promise at a time when he was under pressure from Eurosceptic backbenchers –and when the Tories appeared to be losing votes to Ukip. Most political commentators agree that, given a free hand, he would not have wanted a referendum.Last winter, the Prime Minister embarked on a tour of EU capitals as he sought to renegotiate Britain's terms of membership, which concluded at a summit in February. Presenting the result as a victory, he vowed to campaign with his "heart and soul" to keep Britain inside a "reformed" EU, but several members of his own cabinet campaigned for a British exit – or "Brexit".Minutes after the vote closed on Thursday, it appeared the UK would stay in the EU. Even Ukip's Nigel Farage said it "looks like Remain will edge it".However, when the final results came in, it was the Leave campaign that had won, prompting Cameron to announce that he would resign as prime minister before the Conservative Party conference in October.The pros and cons of leaving the EUThe greatest uncertainty associated with leaving the EU is that no country has ever done it before, so no one can predict the exact result.Membership feeLeaving the EU would result in an immediate cost saving, as the country would no longer contribute to the EU budget, argue Brexiters. Last year, Britain paid in £13bn, but it also received £4.5bn worth of spending, says Full Fact, "so the UK's net contribution was £8.5bn". That's about 7 per cent of what the Government spends on the NHS each year.What's harder to determine is whether the financial advantages of EU membership, such as free trade and inward investment (see below) outweigh the upfront costs.TradeThe EU is a single market in which no tariffs are imposed on imports and exports between member states. "More than 50 per cent of our exports go to EU countries," says Sky News.Membership of the bloc means we have always had a say over how trading rules are drawn up. Britain also benefits from trade deals between the EU and other world powers. "The EU is currently negotiating with the US to create the world's biggest free trade area," says the BBC, "something that will be highly beneficial to British business."Britain risks losing some of that negotiating power by leaving the EU, but it would be free to establish its own trade agreements.Ukip leader Nigel Farage believes Britain could follow the lead of Norway, which has access to the single market but is not bound by EU laws on areas such as agriculture, justice and home affairs. But others argue that an "amicable divorce" would not be possible."If Britain were to join the Norwegian club," says The Economist, "it would remain bound by virtually all EU regulations, including the working-time directive and almost everything dreamed up in Brussels in future." And it would no longer have any influence on what those regulations said.Leading Brexit campaigner Boris Johnson, meanwhile, has proposed adopting a Canada-style trade arrangement. "I think we can strike a deal as the Canadians have done based on trade and getting rid of tariffs" and have a "very, very bright future", he said. The idea was quickly dismissed by Cameron at the time, who said it would mean "years of painful negotiations and a poorer deal than we have today".Eurosceptics argue that the vast majority of small and medium sized firms do not trade with the EU but are restricted by a huge regulatory burden imposed from abroad.A study by the think-tank Open Europe, which campaigned to see the EU radically reformed, found that the worst-case "Brexit" scenario is that the UK economy loses 2.2 per cent of its total GDP by 2030 (by comparison, the recession of 2008-09 knocked about 6 per cent off UK GDP). However, it says that GDP could rise by 1.6 per cent if the UK was able to negotiate a free trade deal with Europe –ie to maintain the current trade set-up –and pursued "very ambitious deregulation".Whether other EU countries would offer such generous terms is one of the big unknowns of the debate. Pro-exit campaigners argued that it would be in the interests of other European countries to re-establish free trade, but their opponents suggested that the EU would want to make life hard for Britain in order to discourage further breakaways.France also warned recently that there would be "consequences" for Britain if it left the EU. InvestmentInward investment was always predicted to slow in the run-up to the vote, due to the uncertainty of the outcome and its consequences: that's what happened in before the Scottish independence referendum in 2014.In the long term, there are diverging views: pro-Europeans think the UK's status as one of the world's biggest financial centres will be diminished if it is no longer seen as a gateway to the EU for the likes of US banks, while Brexit campaigners suggest that, free from EU rules a regulations, Britain could reinvent itself as a Singapore-style supercharged economy.Fears that car-makers could scale back or even end production in the UK if vehicles could no longer be exported tax-free to Europe were underlined by BMW's decision to remind its UK employees at Rolls-Royce and Mini of the "significant benefit" EU membership confers. Likewise, Business for New Europe said tax revenues would drop if companies that do large amounts of business with Europe – particularly banks – moved their headquarters back into theBarclays, however, put forward a worst-case scenario that might have benefitted the Outers. It said the departure of one of the EU's most powerful economies would hit its finances and boost populist anti-EU movements in other countries. This would open a "Pandora's box", said the Daily Telegraph, which could lead to the "collapse of the European project".The UK would then be seen as a safe haven from those risks, attracting investors, boosting the pound and reducing the risk that Scotland would "leave the relative safety of the UK for an increasingly uncertain EU".SovereigntyFor Brexiters, sovereignty was seen as a simple win: few disagree that EU membership involves giving up some control over our own affairs.Labour MP Kate Hoey says the EU is "an attempt to replace the democratic power of the people with a permanent administration in the interests of big business". Those on the right of the Conservative party may disagree with her emphasis, but they agree that EU institutions have drained power from the British Parliament."The trouble is that most of us have no clue as to how the Brussels monolith works, or who's in charge," said Stay or Go, the Connell Guide to the EU referendum. But, it said, we have only ourselves to blame. "We've made it that way" because too many of us "can't be bothered to vote" in European elections.For those in the Remain camp, EU membership involved a worthwhile trade of sovereignty for influence: in return for agreeing to abide by EU rules, Britain had a seat around the table at which they are set - and, say campaigners, its voice was amplified on the world stage as a result. "The truth is that pulling up the drawbridge and quitting the EU will not enhance our national sovereignty," warned Labour's Hilary Benn, who was sacked as shadow foreign secretary this week after complaining about Jeremy Corbyn's leadership. "All it would do is to weaken it by taking away our power to influence events in an ever more complex and interdependent world." Nor, said Remainers, will UK sovereignty be absolute out of the EU: the British government would still be bound by membership of Nato, the UN, the World Trade Organisation, and various treaties and agreements with other nations.ImmigrationUnder EU law, Britain cannot prevent anyone from another member state coming to live in the country – while Britons benefit from an equivalent right to live and work anywhere else in the EU. The result has been a huge increase in immigration into Britain, particularly from eastern and southern Europe.According to the Office for National Statistics, there are 942,000 eastern Europeans, Romanians and Bulgarians working in the UK, along with 791,000 western Europeans – and 2.93m workers from outside the EU. China and India are the biggest source of foreign workers in the UK. Remainers say that, while the recent pace of immigration has led to some difficulties with housing and service provision, the net effect has been overwhelmingly positive. By contrast, Farage insisted immigration should be cut dramatically, and that leaving the EU was the only way to "regain control of our borders". Other pro-Brexit campaigners would not necessarily reduce immigration, but said that it should be up to the British Government to set the rules.Cameron claimed that the concessions he won during the renegotiation of Britain's EU membership would reduce immigration as new arrivals will receive a lower rate of child benefit.The effect of leaving the EU on British jobs depends on a complex interplay of the factors above: trade, investment and immigration.Pro-EU campaigners suggested that three million jobs could be lost if Britain goes it alone. However, while "figures from the early 2000s suggest around three million jobs are linked to trade with the European Union," says Full Fact, "they don't say they are dependent on the UK being an EU member."If trade and investment falls now the UK has voted for Brexit, then some of these jobs would be lost – but if they rose, then new jobs would be created.A drop in immigration would, all else being equal, mean more jobs for the people who remained, but labour shortages could also hold back the economy, reducing its potential for growth. Stuart Rose, former Marks & Spencer chief executive and a prominent pro-EU campaigner, conceded recently that wages may rise if Britain leaves – which would be good for workers, but less so for their employers.Writing for the London School of Economics, Professor Adrian Favell said limiting freedom of movement would deter the "brightest and the best" of the continent from coming to Britain and reduce the pool of candidates employers can choose from.Free movement of people across the EU also opened up job opportunities for British workers seeking to work elsewhere in Europe.Britain's place in the worldFor Outers, leaving the EU will allow Britain to re-establish itself as a truly independent nation with connections to the rest of the world. But Remainers fear that Brexit will result in the country giving up its influence in Europe, turning back the clock and retreating from the global power networks of the 21st century.Brexit would bring some clear-cut advantages, said The Economist before the referendum. The UK "would regain control over fishing rights around its coast", for example. But it concluded that the most likely outcome would be that Britain would find itself "a scratchy outsider with somewhat limited access to the single market, almost no influence and few friends".The UK will remain a member of Nato and the UN, but it may be regarded as a less useful partner by its key ally, the US. The American government said it feared that the "EU referendum is a dangerous gamble that could unravel with disastrous consequences for the entire continent". SecurityFormer work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith, who was in favour of Brexit, said we were leaving the "door open" to terrorist attacks by remaining in the EU. "This open border does not allow us to check and control people," he said.However, a dozen senior military figures, including former chiefs of defence staff Lord Bramall and Jock Stirrup, argued the opposite. In a letter released by No 10, they said that the EU is an "increasingly important pillar of our security", especially at a time of instability in the Middle East and in the face of "resurgent Russian nationalism and aggression".Defence Secretary Michael Fallon has also said the UK benefitted from being part of the EU, as well as Nato and the United Nations. "It is through the EU that you exchange criminal records and passenger records and work together on counter-terrorism," he said. "We need the collective weight of the EU when you are dealing with Russian aggression or terrorism."In contrast, Colonel Richard Kemp, writing in The Times, said these "critical bilateralrelationships" would persist regardless of membership, and that it was "absurd" to suggest that the EU would put its own citizens, or the UK's, at greater risk by reducing cooperation in the event of Brexit."By leaving, we will again be able to determine who does and does not enter the UK," said Kemp, a former head of the international terrorism team at the Cabinet Office. "Failure to do so significantly increases the terrorist threat here, endangers our people and is a betrayal of this country."The country has just taken part in a giant democratic exercise –perhaps the biggest in our history. Over 33 million people –from England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Gibraltar –have all had their say.这个国家刚刚进行了一场大型的民主活动，这也许是我们历史上最大的一次。

卡梅伦脱欧演讲稿英文Dear fellow citizens,Today is a very significant day for our country I stand before you with a heavy heart to address the outcome of the referendum on our membership of the European UnionThe decision has been made, and the British people have spoken The majority has chosen for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union This is a moment of profound change, and it brings with it a great deal of uncertainty and challengesLet me be clear from the outset I respect the decision that has been taken This was a democratic vote, and we must all now accept the result and work together to make the best of itThe referendum campaign was passionate and divisive It exposed deep differences within our society But now is the time to come together, to heal those divisions and to move forward as one United KingdomThe process of leaving the EU will be complex and difficult There are many issues to be negotiated – trade, borders, regulations, and countless others But I am confident that we have the skills and the determination to navigate this path successfullyWe must not forget that the UK is a great country with a proud history and a bright future We have a strong economy, a worldclass educationsystem, and a dynamic and innovative business sector These are assets that will stand us in good stead as we forge a new path outside the EUHowever, we also face some immediate challenges The markets have reacted with volatility, and there are concerns about the impact on jobs and the economy in the short term But we must remain calm and focused We have faced difficult situations before and have always emerged strongerThe government will do everything in its power to provide stability and certainty We will work closely with businesses, workers, and all those affected to ensure that the transition is as smooth as possibleIt is important to remember that our relationships with our European friends and partners will remain crucial We share a continent, and we have common interests and values We must strive to maintain the closest possible ties, based on friendship and mutual respectIn the coming weeks and months, there will be much discussion and debate about the way forward There will be different views and different priorities, but we must all keep the best interests of our country at heartFinally, I want to say to every citizen of the United Kingdom that this is your country, and its future is in your hands We have faced great challenges before and overcome them Together, we will rise to this challenge and build a better, stronger and more prosperous Britain for generations to comeThank you＿____。

Brexit,a term coined by merging Britain and exit,refers to the United Kingdoms decision to leave the European Union EU.This historic event,which took place on June 23,2016,through a referendum,has had profound implications for the UK,the EU,and the global economy.The referendum saw51.9%of the voters choosing to leave the EU,while48.1%voted to remain.This decision was driven by a variety of factors,including concerns over immigration,national sovereignty,and the financial contributions the UK made to the EU.One of the primary reasons for Brexit was the issue of immigration.The EUs freedom of movement policy allows citizens of member countries to live and work in any other member state without needing permission.Some British citizens felt that this policy led to an influx of immigrants,putting pressure on public services and job opportunities. Another significant factor was the perceived loss of sovereignty.Critics of the EU argued that the UK was subject to too many regulations and decisions made by the EU that affected its domestic policies.They believed that leaving the EU would allow the UK to regain control over its laws and borders.The financial aspect of the EU membership was also a contentious issue.The UK was one of the largest contributors to the EU budget,which some saw as a burden on the countrys economy.Proponents of Brexit argued that the money could be better spent on domestic needs,such as the National Health Service.The process of leaving the EU,known as the Article50process,was initiated by the UK government in March2017.This started a twoyear countdown for negotiations on the terms of the UKs exit.The negotiations covered a wide range of topics,including trade, the rights of EU citizens living in the UK,and the financial settlement the UK would have to pay to the EU.One of the most challenging aspects of the Brexit negotiations was the issue of the Irish border.The UKs only land border with the EU is between Northern Ireland,which is part of the UK,and the Republic of Ireland,an EU member state.The Good Friday Agreement,which brought peace to the region after decades of conflict,relies on an open border.Finding a solution that respects both the UKs desire for an independent trade policy and the need for an open border has been a complex task.The Brexit process has also had significant political implications within the UK.It led to the resignation of Prime Minister David Cameron,who was a strong advocate for remaining in the EU,and has seen multiple changes in leadership within the ConservativeParty.The issue has also divided the country,with strong opinions on both sides of the debate.The UK officially left the EU on January31,2020,entering a transition period that was initially set to end on December31,2020.During this time,the UK and the EU continued to negotiate their future relationship.The transition period was later extended to allow more time for negotiations,and a trade deal was finally agreed upon in late December 2020.The impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU is still unfolding.Economically,the UK faces the challenge of establishing new trade agreements not only with the EU but also with other countries around the world.Politically,the UK must navigate its new role as an independent nation outside of the EU,while the EU must adapt to the loss of one of its largest and most influential members.In conclusion,Brexit represents a significant shift in the political and economic landscape of both the UK and the EU.The process has been complex and contentious,with farreaching implications for the future of both entities.As the UK continues to forge its path outside of the EU,the full impact of this historic decision will become clearer over time.。

Brexit,a term coined by merging Britain and exit,has been a hot topic since the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in June2016.This historic decision has had farreaching implications not only for the UK but also for the EU and the global economy.In this essay,we will delve into the reasons behind Brexit,its impact,and the challenges that lie ahead.The Genesis of BrexitThe idea of Brexit can be traced back to the UKs complex relationship with the EU.Over the years,the UK has often been seen as an awkward partner within the EU,with disagreements on various policies and a reluctance to fully integrate into the European project.The referendum on EU membership was called by then Prime Minister David Cameron,who believed that a decisive vote would settle the issue and strengthen the UKs position within the EU.However,the result was the opposite,with51.9%of voters choosing to leave.Economic ImplicationsBrexit has had significant economic implications.The immediate aftermath saw a drop in the value of the pound,which affected imports and exports,leading to increased inflation and a potential rise in unemployment.The uncertainty surrounding Brexit negotiations has also deterred investment,with some businesses choosing to relocate their operations to other EU countries to maintain access to the single market.Political RamificationsPolitically,Brexit has led to a period of instability in the UK.The decision to leave the EU has sparked debates on national identity,sovereignty,and the future direction of the country.It has also led to a change in leadership,with several Prime Ministers coming and going since the referendum,each with their approach to negotiating the UKs exit.Social ImpactSocially,Brexit has highlighted divisions within the UK.The referendum exposed a generational divide,with younger voters generally favoring remain and older voters tending to vote for leave.It has also brought to light regional disparities,with urban areas and Scotland showing a stronger preference for remaining in the EU compared to rural areas and parts of Northern England.Challenges AheadThe road ahead is fraught with challenges.The UK must negotiate new trade deals, redefine its immigration policies,and determine its role on the global stage.The Northern Ireland border issue remains a contentious point,with the potential for disrupting the peace process established by the Good Friday Agreement.ConclusionBrexit is a complex and multifaceted issue that has reshaped the UKs relationship with the EU and the world.The decision to leave has sparked a period of introspection and change,with the full implications yet to be fully understood.As the UK navigates its postBrexit future,it will be crucial to address the economic,political,and social challenges that have arisen,ensuring that the country moves forward in a way that benefits all its citizens.。

英国脱欧，卡梅伦悲情演讲，宣布辞职！（视频中英文演讲全文）在英国脱欧公投结果公布一小时后，英国首相卡梅伦在唐宁街10号门外发表讲话，宣布辞去首相一职。

卡梅伦在演讲中说到：“我爱这个国家，有机会为其服务是我的荣幸。

”推荐大家看看这段理性而悲情的演讲，纯正英音，语速适中，值得收藏！附中英文全文：The country has just taken part in a giant democratic exercise–perhaps the biggest in our history.这个国家刚刚进行了一场大型的民主活动，这也许是我们历史上最大的一次。

Over 33 million people –from England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Gibraltar –have all had their say.超过三千三百万来自英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和直布罗陀的人民表达了他们的声音。

We should be proud of the fact that in these islands we trust the people with these big decisions.我们应该为这个事实感到骄傲。

在这片国土上，我们相信人民是重大的决策者。

We not only have a parliamentary democracy, but on questions about the arrangements for how we are governed, there aretimes when it is right to ask the people themselves, and that is what we have done.我们不仅拥有议会民主制度，而且还在如何管理这个国家的问题上，我们也会适时征求人民的意愿。

对此我们已经做到了。

I come from an island where many of us like to believe there's been a lot of continuity over the last thousand years. We tend to have historically imposed change on others but done much less of it ourselves.So it came as an immense shock to me when I woke up on the morning of June 24 to discover that my country had voted to leave the European Union, my Prime Minister had resigned, and Scotland was considering a referendum that could bring to an end the very existence of the United Kingdom. So that was an immense shock for me, and it was an immense shock for many people, but it was also something that, over the following several days, created a complete political meltdown in my country. There were calls for a second referendum, almost as if, following a sports match, we could ask the opposition for a replay. Everybody was blaming everybody else. People blamed the Prime Minister for calling the referendum in the first place. They blamed the leader of the opposition for not fighting it hard enough. The young accused the old. The educated blamed the less well-educated. That complete meltdown was made even worse by the most tragic element of it:levels of xenophobia and racist abuse in the streets of Britain at a level that I have never seen before in my lifetime. People are now talking about whether my country is becoming a Little England, or, as one of my colleagues put it, whether we're about to become a 1950s nostalgia theme park floating in the Atlantic Ocean.But my question is really, should we have the degree of shock that we've experienced since? Was it something that took place overnight? Or are there deeper structuralfactors that have led us to where we are today? So I want to take a step back and ask two very basic questions. First, what does Brexit represent, not just for my country, but for all of us around the world? And second, what can we do about it? How should we all respond?So first, what does Brexit represent? Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Brexit teaches us many things about our society and about societies around the world. It highlights in ways that we seem embarrassingly unaware of how divided our societies are. The vote split along lines of age, education, class and geography. Young people didn't turn out to vote in great numbers, but those that did wanted to remain. Older people really wanted to leave the European Union. Geographically, it was London and Scotland that most strongly committedto being part of the European Union, while in other parts of the country there was very strong ambivalence. Those divisions are things we really need to recognize and take seriously. But more profoundly, the vote teaches us something about the nature of politics today. Contemporary politics is no longer just about right and left. It's no longer just about tax and spend. It's about globalization. The fault line of contemporary politics is between those that embrace globalization and those that fear globalization.If we look at why those who wanted to leave -- we call them "Leavers," as opposed to "Remainers" -- we see two factors in the opinion polls that really mattered. The first was immigration, and the second sovereignty, and these represent a desire for people to take back control of their own lives and the feeling that they are unrepresented bypoliticians.But those ideas are ones that signify fear and alienation. They represent a retreat back towards nationalism and borders in ways that many of us would reject. What I want to suggest is the picture is more complicated than that, that liberal internationalists, like myself, and I firmly include myself in that picture, need to write ourselves back into the picture in order to understand how we've got to where we are today. When we look at the voting patterns across the United Kingdom, we can visibly see the divisions. The blue areas show Remain and the red areas Leave. When I looked at this, what personally struck me was the very little time in my life I've actually spent in many of the red areas. I suddenly realized that, looking at the top 50 areas in the UK that have the strongest Leave vote, I've spent a combined total of four days of my life in those areas. In some of those places, I didn't even know the names of the voting districts. It was a real shock to me, and it suggested that people like me who think of ourselves as inclusive, open and tolerant,perhaps don't know our own countries and societies nearly as well as we like to believe.And the challenge that comes from that is we need to find a new way to narrate globalization to those people, to recognize that for those people who have not necessarily been to university, who haven't necessarily grown up with the Internet, that don't get opportunities to travel, they may be unpersuaded by the narrative that we find persuasive in our often liberal bubbles.It means that we need to reach out more broadly and understand. In the Leave vote, a minority have peddled the politics of fear and hatred, creating lies and mistrust around,for instance, the idea that the vote on Europe could reduce the number of refugees and asylum-seekers coming to Europe, when the vote on leaving had nothing to do with immigration from outside the European Union. But for a significant majority of the Leave voters the concern was disillusionment with the political establishment. This was a protest vote for many, a sense that nobody represented them, that they couldn't find a political party that spoke for them, and so they rejected that political establishment.This replicates around Europe and much of the liberal democratic world. We see it with the rise in popularity of Donald Trump in the United States, with the growing nationalism of Viktor Orbán in Hungary, with the increase in popularity of Marine Le Pen in France. The specter of Brexit is in all of our societies.So the question I think we need to ask is my second question, which is how should we collectively respond? For all of us who care about creating liberal, open, tolerant societies,we urgently need a new vision, a vision of a more tolerant, inclusive globalization, one that brings people with us rather than leaving them behind.That vision of globalization is one that has to start by a recognition of the positive benefits of globalization. The consensus amongst economists is that free trade, the movement of capital, the movement of people across borders benefit everyone on aggregate. The consensus amongst international relations scholars is that globalization brings interdependence, which brings cooperation and peace. But globalization also has redistributive effects. It creates winners and losers. To take the example ofmigration, we know that immigration is a net positive for the economy as a whole under almost all circumstances. But we also have to be very aware that there are redistributive consequences, that importantly, low-skilled immigration can lead to a reduction in wages for the most impoverished in our societies and also put pressure on house prices. That doesn't detract from the fact that it's positive, but it means more people have to share in those benefits and recognize them.In 2002, the former Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, gave a speech at Yale University, and that speech was on the topic of inclusive globalization. That was the speech in which he coined that term. And he said, and I paraphrase, "The glass house of globalization has to be open to all if it is to remain secure. Bigotry and ignorance are the ugly face of exclusionary and antagonistic globalization."That idea of inclusive globalization was briefly revived in 2008 in a conference on progressive governance involving many of the leaders of European countries. But amid austerity and the financial crisis of 2008, the concept disappeared almost without a trace.Globalization has been taken to support a neoliberal agenda. It's perceived to be part of an elite agenda rather than something that benefits all. And it needs to be reclaimed on a far more inclusive basis than it is today.So the question is, how can we achieve that goal? How can we balance on the one hand addressing fear and alienation while on the other hand refusing vehemently togive in to xenophobia and nationalism? That is the question for all of us. And I think, as a social scientist, that social science offers some places to start. Our transformation has to be about both ideas and about material change, and I want to give you four ideas as a starting point.The first relates to the idea of civic education. What stands out from Brexit is the gap between public perception and empirical reality. It's been suggested that we've moved to a postfactual society, where evidence and truth no longer matter, and lies have equal status to the clarity of evidence. So how can we --How can we rebuild respect for truth and evidence into our liberal democracies? It has to begin with education, but it has to start with the recognition that there are huge gaps.In 2014, the pollster Ipsos MORI published a survey on attitudes to immigration, and it showed that as numbers of immigrants increase, so public concern with immigration also increases, although it obviously didn't unpack causality, because this could equally be to do not so much with numbers but the political and media narrative around it. But the same survey also revealed huge public misinformation and misunderstanding about the nature of immigration. For example, in these attitudes in the United Kingdom, the public believed that levels of asylum were a greater proportion of immigration than they were, but they also believed the levels of educational migration were far lower as a proportion of overall migration than theyactually are. So we have to address this misinformation, the gap between perception and reality on key aspects of globalization. And that can't just be something that's left to our schools, although that's important to begin at an early age. It has to be about lifelong civic participation and public engagement that we all encourage as societies.The second thing that I think is an opportunity is the idea to encourage more interaction across diverse communities.One of the things that stands out for me very strikingly, looking at immigration attitudes in the United Kingdom, is that ironically, the regions of my country that are the most tolerant of immigrants have the highest numbers of immigrants. So for instance, London and the Southeast have the highest numbers of immigrants, and they are also by far the most tolerant areas. It's those areas of the country that have the lowest levels of immigration that actually are the most exclusionary and intolerant towards migrants.So we need to encourage exchange programs. We need to ensure that older generations who maybe can't travel get access to the Internet. We need to encourage, even on a local and national level, more movement, more participation, more interaction with people who we don't know and whose views we might not necessarily agree with.The third thing that I think is crucial, though, and this is really fundamental, is we have to ensure that everybody shares in the benefits of globalization. This illustration fromthe Financial Times post-Brexit is really striking. It shows tragically that those people who voted to leave the European Union were those who actually benefited the most materiallyfrom trade with the European Union. But the problem is that those people in those areasdidn't perceive themselves to be beneficiaries. They didn't believe that they were actually getting access to material benefits of increased trade and increased mobility around the world.I work on questions predominantly to do with refugees, and one of the ideas I spent a lot of my time preaching, mainly to developing countries around the world, is that in order to encourage the integration of refugees, we can't just benefit the refugee populations, we also have to address the concerns of the host communities in local areas. But in looking at that, one of the policy prescriptions is that we have to provide disproportionately better education facilities, health facilities, access to social services in those regions of high immigration to address the concerns of those local populations. But while we encourage that around the developing world, we don't take those lessons home and incorporate them in our own societies.Furthermore, if we're going to really take seriously the need to ensure people share in the economic benefits, our businesses and corporations need a model of globalization that recognizes that they, too, have to take people with them.The fourth and final idea I want to put forward is an idea that we need more responsible politics. There's very little social science evidence that compares attitudes onglobalization.But from the surveys that do exist, what we can see is there's huge variation across different countries and time periods in those countries for attitudes and tolerance of questions like migration and mobility on the one hand and free trade on the other. But one hypothesis that I think emerges from a cursory look at that data is the idea that polarized societies are far less tolerant of globalization. It's the societies like Sweden in the past, like Canada today, where there is a centrist politics, where right and left work together, that we encourage supportive attitudes towards globalization. And what we see around the world today is a tragic polarization, a failure to have dialogue between the extremes in politics,and a gap in terms of that liberal center ground that can encourage communication and a shared understanding. We might not achieve that today, but at the very least we have to call upon our politicians and our media to drop a language of fear and be far more tolerant of one another.These ideas are very tentative, and that's in part because this needs to be an inclusive and shared project.For those of us who believe that our identities are not mutually exclusive, we have to all work together to ensure that globalization takes everyone with us and doesn't leave people behind. Only then will we truly reconcile democracy and globalization.。

英国脱欧英文作文Brexit has been a hot topic for years now, dividing the nation and causing chaos in the political arena. Some people are thrilled to finally be leaving the EU, while others are terrified of the unknown consequences.The uncertainty surrounding Brexit has caused businesses to hold off on investments and consumers to tighten their belts. The economy is feeling the strain, and many fear that things will only get worse once the transition period ends.Politicians have been scrambling to come up with a deal that satisfies everyone, but so far, it seems like a near-impossible task. The back-and-forth negotiations have left many feeling frustrated and disillusioned with the whole process.Despite the challenges and setbacks, there are some who believe that Brexit will ultimately be a positive changefor the country. They argue that it will give the UK more control over its own laws and borders, leading to a stronger, more independent nation.On the other hand, there are those who worry that Brexit will only serve to isolate the UK and damage its relationships with other countries. They fear that the economic repercussions will be severe and long-lasting, with no clear solution in sight.As the deadline for Brexit looms closer, the nation holds its breath, unsure of what the future holds. Whether it will be a success or a disaster remains to be seen, but one thing is for certain – the effects of Brexit will be felt for years to come.。

英国脱欧英文作文Brexit has been a hot topic in the UK for years now. Some people are really excited about it, while others are totally against it. It's been a long and bumpy road to get to this point, and it's definitely caused a lot of division in the country.I think the main issue with Brexit is that no onereally knows what's going to happen next. There's so much uncertainty about the future of the UK and its relationship with the EU. It's like we're standing on the edge of a cliff, not knowing if we're going to fall or fly.One thing's for sure, though – Brexit has already had a huge impact on the economy. The value of the pound has been fluctuating like crazy, and a lot of businesses are feeling the pressure. It's like we're all holding our breath, waiting to see what's going to happen next.As for me, I'm just hoping that Brexit doesn't causetoo much chaos. I don't want to see the UK fall into a state of turmoil because of this decision. I just want things to work out for the best, whatever that may be.But at the end of the day, Brexit is happening whether we like it or not. It's a done deal, and now we just have to wait and see what the future holds for the UK. I guess only time will tell how this whole thing is going to play out.。