Effects of a Collective Spin Resonance Mode on the STM Spectra of D-Wave Superconductors

  • 格式:pdf
  • 大小:183.19 KB
  • 文档页数:5

arXiv:cond-mat/0302494v3 [cond-mat.supr-con] 12 Nov 2003EffectsofaCollectiveSpinResonanceModeontheSTMSpectraofD-WaveSuperconductors

Jian-XinZhu,1JunSun,2QimiaoSi,2andA.V.Balatsky11TheoreticalDivision,MSB262,LosAlamosNationalLaboratory,LosAlamos,NewMexico87545

2DepartmentofPhysics&Astronomy,RiceUniversity,Houston,Texas77005

Ahigh-energyspinresonancemodeisknowntoexistinmanyhigh-temperaturesuperconduc-tors.Motivatedbyrecentscanningtunnelingmicroscopy(STM)experimentsinsuperconductingBi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ,westudytheeffectsofthisresonancemodeonthelocaldensityofstates(LDOS).Thecouplingbetweentheelectronsinad-wavesuperconductorandtheresonancemodeproduceshigh-energypeaksintheLDOS,whichdisplaysatwo-unit-cellperiodicmodulationaroundanon-magneticimpurity.Thissuggestsanewmeanstonotonlydetectthedynamicalspincollectivemodebutalsostudyitscouplingtoelectronicexcitations.

PACSnumbers:74.25.Jb,74.50.+r,74.20.-z,73.20.Hb

Aprominentfeatureintheexcitationspectrumofthehigh-Tcsuperconductorsisthe“41meV”collectivespinresonancemode,seenbyinelasticneutronscatteringex-perimentsinmostofthecupratefamilies[1,2,3,4].Thephysicsofthisresonancemode–includingitsmi-croscopicorigin,itsconnectionswithotherphysicalprop-erties,aswellasitsroleonsuperconductivityitself–hasbeenthesubjectofconsiderabledebate.Giventherecentdevelopmentsoftheatomicresolutionscanningtunnelingmicroscopy(STM)[5,6,7,8,9],itistimelytoaddressthepossiblemanifestationofthisresonancemodeinthelocaldensityofstates(LDOS).Anumberoftheoreticalworks[10,11,12,13]haveaddressedtheeffectofrelatedspinfluctuationsontheLDOS.Theseworksfocusedonthepinningofthespinfluctuationsbyimpurity:adynamicalspinmodecenteredaroundthewavevectorQleadstoa2Qspatialmodulationinthelow-energyLDOS.Thisresultissmoothlyconnectedtowhathappensinthecaseofastaticspin-density-waveor-dering[14,15].However,fortheresonancemode–whichissharplypeakedatQ=(π,π)–sucheffectswouldnotbemanifested[since2Q=(2π,2π)isequivalentto(0,0)].Therearealsoworksaboutquasiparticlescatteringfromnomagneticimpurities[16,17].Inthispaper,weshowthatthecouplingofd-wavequasiparticlestotheresonancemodedoesproducespa-tialmodulationsintheLDOSaroundanimpurity.Thefeatureislocatedatrelativelyhighenergies,≈±(∆0+Ω0),where∆0isthemaximumsuperconductingen-ergygapandΩ0theresonanceenergy.Inaddition,thewavevectoroftheLDOSmodulationisclosetoQ=(π,π).OurpredictionscouldbeobservablebytheSTMexperiments.SuchSTMstudiesrepresentanewmeanstocharacterizethecouplingbetweentheelec-tronicexcitationsandtheresonancemode.TheSTMfeaturewediscussrelatestothe“peak-dip-hump”struc-tureoftheangleresolvedphotoemissionspectroscopy(ARPES)[18,19,20,21,22,23];theinferenceabouttheelectron-spincouplingfromtheARPESandrelatedspectroscopiesisatopicofrecentcontroversy[20,21]andwehopethattheSTMstudiesweproposewillshednewlightonthisimportantissue.WestartwithamodelHamiltoniandescribingtwo-dimensionalelectronscoupledtoacollectivespinmodeandinthepresenceofasingle-siteimpurity:H=HBCS+Hsp+Himp.HeretheBCS-typeHamiltonianforauniformd-wavesuperconductorisgivenbyHBCS=󰀆k,σ(εk−µ)c†kσckσ+󰀆

k(∆kc†k↑c†−k↓+∆∗kc−k↓ck↑),

wherec†kσ(ckσ)creates(annihilates)aconductionelec-tronofspinσandwavevectork,εkisthenormalstateenergydispersionfortheconductionelectrons,µthechemicalpotential,and∆k=∆0

4󰀃q󰀃Ωl

χ(q;iΩl)G0(k−q;iωn−iΩl),

whereχ(q;iΩl)isthedynamicalspinsusceptibilityχij(τ)=󰀈Tτ(Sxi(τ)Sxj(0))󰀉andΩl=2lπTthebosonic2 +a)+ ++...b)...FIG.1:a)DiagramsforG(p,p+q;ω).ThethicksolidlinerepresentsthefullconductionelectronGreen’sfunctionintheabsenceofimpurity,G

−10(k;iωn)=󰀇iωn−ξk−Σ11−∆k−Σ12−∆k−Σ21iωn+ξk−Σ22󰀉.

(1)Thecorrespondingreal-spacedressedGreen’sfunctionG

0(iωn)=G

0(i,j;E)+󰀃lmG0(m,j;E).(2)

Duetothevertexcorrectionsinducedbythecouplingtothecollectivemodes(Fig.1a),theTmatrixingeneralcontainssite-off-diagonalterms.Wewillfirstcarryoutthecalculationwithoutthevertexcorrections,inwhichcaseˆTlm=ˆTδl,0δm,0,withˆT−1=U−10σ3−ˆg

πImG11(i,i;E+iγ),(3)whereγ=0+.Uptonow,ourdiscussionandformulationarequitegeneralandcanbeusedtostudytheeffectsofanydy-namicmodeoncethesusceptibilityχisknown.Wetreatthesusceptibilityinaphenomenologicalform(basedontheinelasticneutronscatteringobservations),seealso[22]:

χ(q;iΩl)=−δq,QiΩl−Ω0−1

πImG0,11.Notethattheweightofthepeakat−∆0islargerthanat∆0becausethevanHovesingularityisbelowtheFermienergy.Sincethespectralweightofthespinresonance