培训手册2006版

培训手册第一章：培训的概述第二章：新员工培训第三章：员工技能提升培训第四章：培训的计划与实施第五章：内部讲师政策第六章：外部讲师政策第七章：培训需求分析第八章：课程设计与开发第九章：培训教材与器材第十章：培训管理制度第十一章：培训效果第一章：培训的概述1-1培训意义：在激烈的市场竞争环境下，一个企业要想有长足的发展，就必须有人才、技术、信息、资源作支撑，其中人才素质高低对企业的发展发挥着不可估量的作用。

在面临全球化、高质量、高效率的挑战中，培训显得更为重要。

为配合公司长远发展，通过培训为公司发掘、培养、储备各类型人才。

培训使企业价值观、企业宗旨、企业精神、企业制度得以广泛传播和执行；使员工的知识、技能与态度明显提高与改善，由此提高企业效益，获得竞争优势。

1-2培训目的：培训工作持续、系统的进行；通过知识、经验、能力的积累、传播、应用与创新，提升员工职业技能与职业素质，使之适应企业发展的需要。

1-3培训原则：以符合企业发展与组织能力提升为基本原则，并注意针对性和系统性。

1-3-1公司全体员工均享有培训和教育的权利和义务。

1-3-2工培训须有益于公司利益和企业形象。

1-3-3员工培训和教育遵循与工作需要相结合、讲求实效的原则。

1-3-4公司员工培训管理实行“对口培训、配合实施”的原则，即培训部统一制定公司总体培训制度的规范，并协调各部门完成培训项目的计划、组织、实施和效果评估与改进。

1-3-5培训部具体负责管理人员培训、新员工综合培训及其它培训的组织、跟踪、检查及效果评估，对公司各部门的培训进行考核，并管理公司的培训费用开支。

1-4适用范围：本办法适用公司所有培训活动的计划、实施、效果评估等相关的工作。

1-5培训责任划分：1-5-1培训部责任（1）培训部负责统筹规划公司教育培训并管控经费的有效使用，是公司培训体系/流程的主要责任人。

（2）拟订培训计划，执行培训计划。

（3）负责培训体系建设与管理。

尤其要组织培养内部培训师，建立公司的内部培训师队伍。

第一章公司的简介一、公司发展沿革香港周六福珠宝国际集团有限公司于2004 年在香港成立，专业从事黄金、铂金、钯金、等珠宝首饰的设计、生产、经营业务。

同年，香港周六福开始在中国大陆进行“周六福”品牌珠宝首饰的运营，在深圳成立第一家周六福珠宝商铺。

经过多年的努力，香港周六福已经具备一定的规模，拥有自主独立的产品研发队伍，及规模庞大的贵金属首饰生产工厂、钻石镶嵌加工厂，更以“镶嵌专家”而闻名于业界。

截止至2010年3月份，香港周六福已经在中国大陆地区设立了“周六福”品牌珠宝首饰加盟店及直营店总数达673 家，销售网点遍及全国各地。

目前，“周六福”珠宝在全国为求职者提供了包括设计、生产、物流、销售、后勤保障等职能部门工作岗位多达200 多个，实现就业人数总数量达15000多人。

自进入中国大陆市场以来，香港周六福“周六福”品牌的珠宝首饰因其良好的品质、优质的服务，深受中国大陆地区消费者青睐。

2005 年4月18日，“周六福”珠宝系列被中国中轻产品质量保障中心授予“中国著名品牌”称号。

2006年1月8日，“周六福”珠宝被中国质量领先企业调查组委会授予“消费者最信赖中国珠宝首饰十大质量品牌”、“消费者最信赖中国质量500 强”称号三、“周六福” 行业地位和获得荣誉情况香港周六福珠宝国际集团公司自投资大陆以来，始终坚持以创造中国名牌为战略目标。

力求完美，从周六福珠宝品牌的形象出发，凭借新颖的款式。

一流的工艺和良好的信誉，以及严格的科学管理，让周六福珠宝在2005 年被评为“中国著名品牌”。

2006 年又同时被评为“消费者最信赖，中国质量500 强”和“消费者最信赖，中国珠宝首饰十大质量品牌”。

通过多年的沉淀，目前周六福在全国已经有300多家加盟商，消费群体覆盖全国大江南北。

第二章柜台日常管理第一节导购岗位职责一、导购的涵义和要求（一）导购和涵义导购是指在零售终端通过现场服务引导顾客购买、促进产品销售的人员。

他们是：1、形象代言人导购面对面地直接与顾客沟通，我们的一举一动、一言一行在顾客的眼中就代表着企业（品牌）的形象。

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 11-2F-16VOLUME 220 JUNE 2006Flying OperationsF-16--AIRCREW EVALUATION CRITERIACOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available on the e-Publishing website at for downloading or ordering.RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication.OPR:HQ ACC/A3TV Certified by:HQ USAF/ A3O(Brig Gen Robert C. Kane) Supersedes AFI 11-2F-16, V olume 2,15 March 2001Pages:64This volume implements AFPD 11-2, Aircraft Rules and Procedures; AFPD 11-4, Aviation Service; and AFI 11-202V2, Aircrew Standardization/Evaluation Program. It applies to all F-16 units. This instruction does apply to Air National Guard (ANG) and Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC). MAJCOMs/DRUs/ FOAs are to forward proposed MAJCOM/DRU/FOA-level supplements to this volume to HQ USAF/ A3OT, through HQ ACC/A3TV, for approval prior to publication in accordance with (IAW) AFPD 11-2, paragraph 4.2. Copies of MAJCOM/DRU/FOA-level supplements, after approved and published, will be provided by the issuing MAJCOM/DRU/FOA to HQ USAF/A3OT, HQ ACC/A3TV, and the user MAJ-COM/DRU/FOA and National Guard Bureau offices of primary responsibility. Field units below MAJ-COM/DRU/FOA level will forward copies of their supplements to this publication to their parent MAJCOM/DRU/FOA office of primary responsibility for post publication review. NOTE: The terms Direct Reporting Unit (DRU) and Field Operating Agency (FOA) as used in this paragraph refer only to those DRUs/FOAs that report directly to HQ USAF. Keep supplements current by complying with AFI 33-360V1, Air Force Content Management Program—Publications. See paragraph 1.2. of this volume for guidance on submitting comments and suggesting improvements to this publication.This publication requires the collection and or maintenance of information protected by the Privacy Act (PA) of 1974. The authorities to collect and or maintain the records prescribed in this publication are Title 10, United States Code, Chapter 857 and Executive Order 9397, Numbering System for Federal Accounts Relating to Individual Persons, November 22, 1943. Forms affected by the PA have an appropriate PA statement. System of records notice F011 AF XO A, Aviation Resource Management System (ARMS) (December 26, 2002, 67 FR 78777) applies. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1974 as amended in 1996 affects this instruction. Ensure that all records created as a result of processes prescribed in this publica-tion are maintained in accordance with AFMAN 37-123 (will convert to 33-363), Management of Records and disposed of in accordance with the Air Force Records Disposition Schedule (RDS) located at https:// .Recommendations for improvements to this volume will be submitted on AF IMT 847, Recommenda-tion for Change of Publication, through channels, to the parent MAJCOM Stan/Eval. Parent MAJCOM Stan/Eval will forward approved recommendations to lead command OPR (HQ ACC/A3TV, 204 Dodd Blvd, Suite 133, Langley AFB VA 23665-2789). HQ USAF/A3 is the approval authority for interim changes to this instruction.SUMMARY OF CHANGESThe opening paragraph to this instruction has been reworded for clarity and updated. AF Form 8 has been changed to AF IMT 8, Certificate of Aircrew Qualification throughout the document Para 1.2.: Recom-mendation for Change of Publication moved to opening paragraph. Para 1.3.1.: added reference to new Chapter 4 for emergency procedure evaluations. Para 1.3.2.: added “video tape recorder” and Air Com-bat Maneuvering Instrumentation“, deleted corresponding abbreviation (all abbreviations of terms which show up just one time have been deleted in the document). Para 1.3.5.: deleted (merged into para 2.1.2.), following paragraph renumbered. Para 1.4.2.: added term “angle of attack”. Table 1.1.: new layout, added grading criteria. Para 1.5.: reworded for clarity. Para 1.5.1.1. to 1.5.1.4.(and sub-paragraphs): rearranged, reworded for clarity. Added explanation for “XX”. Added requirement for Engine Failure/Airstart and Out Of Control Recovery CAPs for all EPEs. Para 1.5.2. and 1.5.2.1.: reworded for clarity. Para 1.5.2.3.: deleted; “Recovery Procedures” now incorporated in para 1.5.1.1.3. Para 1.5.3.: reworded. 1.5.3.3.: added “threat reaction”. Para 1.5.3.5.: added term “terrain following radar”. Para 1.5.4.: reworded for clarity. Para 1.5.5.: added paragraph on combined MSN/INSTM/QUAL EPEs. Para 1.5.6.: renumbered. Para 1.6.: renumbered; paragraph on publications moved to 2.1.3.. Para 1.6.1.: reworded, added MAJCOM Ready Aircrew Program tasking message events as reference. Para 1.6.2.: added term “Forward Air Con-troller”. Para 1.6.3.: added sentence about shot validity. Table 1.2.: updated to match corresponding text and actual requirements. Para 1.6.4.: text added for clarification. Para 1.8.: deleted text on record disposi-tion. Para. 2.1.1.: deleted sentence on applicability (already covered in foreword). Para 2.1.2. to 2.1.2.3.: text reworded and added to reflect more differentiated evaluation requirements. Para 2.1.3.: former para-graph 1.6. Deleted explanation for “XX”; added procedures for ANG. Para 2.1.3.1.: added. Para 2.1.3.5.: added. Para 2.1.4.: text amended – aspects of Cockpit/Crew Resource Management are now embedded in other grading criteria. NOTE deleted. Para 2.1.5.: added paragraph on combined MSN/INSTM/QUAL evaluations. Para 2.2.: text added, deleted requirement for approval to administer an INSTM/QUAL eval-uation on a compatible training mission. Para 2.2.1. to 2.2.1.4.: renumbered, “Instrument Refresher Course” deleted. Para 2.3.: deleted requirement for written mission evaluation profiles; paragraph reworded for clarity; evaluations during exercises or exercise deployments are encouraged now. NOTE on BMC-aircrew added. Para 2.3.2.: reworded. Para 2.3.2.1.: deleted. Para 2.3.2.2.: deleted. Para 2.3.3.: added AFTTP 3-1 as reference. Para 2.3.3.3.: reworded for clarity. Para 2.3.5.: added “(A)”. 2.3.6.: text on FTU Instructor Pilots relocated in para 2.5.: following paragraphs renumbered. Para 2.3.6.: Reworded to make RESCORT mandatory. Para 2.3.7. (old): deleted. Para 2.4.: added reference Chapter 4 Para 2.5. and following sub-paragraphs: reworded for clarity; text supplemented to better describe Instructor eval-uation requirements. Para 2.6.1.2.: reworded. Para 2.6.2.: deleted term “Emergency Procedure Evalua-tion”. Table 2.1.: newly formatted, completely revised. Deleted SEAD as mission evaluation profile. Several grading areas have been reevaluated as mandatory items on specific mission profiles. NOTE 1.: amended and reworded for clarity. NOTE 3.: added “Simulated Flame Out”; amended to give more pre-cise guidance on SFO requirements. Added PACAF to the exception. NOTE 4.: reworded. NOTE 7.: added. NOTE 8.: added. Table 2.2.: added criteria for EPE. Para 3.2.1.1.1. to 3.2.1.1.3.: text added to bet-ter reflect all relevant aspects of mission planning and crew coordination. Para 3.2.1.2. and sub-para-graphs: criteria for publications added. Para 3.2.2.1.1. to 3.2.2.1.3.: text added. Para 3.2.2.2.1. to 3.2.2.2.3.: text added and amended. Para 3.2.2.3.1. to 3.2.2.3.3.: text added and amended. Para 3.2.2.4.1. and 3.2.2.4.2.: reworded. Para 3.2.4.2.and 3.2.4.3.: reworded. Para 3.2.5.1.3.: reworded. Para 3.2.6.1.: added term “Visual Flight Rules”. Para 3.2.6.2. and sub-paragraphs: replaced “rendezvous” with “rejoin”. Para 3.2.8.1.: deleted examples for “assigned airspace”. Para 3.2.9.1.1. to 3.2.9.1.3.: text added. Para 3.2.9.2.1. to 3.2.9.2.3.: text amended/added. Para 3.2.10.3.: text added for clarification. Para 3.2.11.1.: reworded. Para 3.2.11.3.: text added. Para 3.2.12. and para 3.2.12.1.: deleted “SIF”. Para 3.2.13.: deleted (publication check is now in para 3.2.1.2.). Para 3.2.14.: deleted terms “Advanced Handling/Tactical Maneuvering”. Para 3.2.16.: added term “Built In Test”. Para 3.2.17.1.1.: added term “Emission Control”. Para 3.2.17.2.2.: deleted last sentence. Para 3.2.17.2.3.: reworded. Para 3.2.20.: deleted “trail”. Para 3.2.20.1. to 3.2.20.3.: replaced “approach” with “recovery”. Para 3.2.22.1.: reworded. Para 3.2.22.2.1. and 3.2.22.2.2.: deleted, text included in para 3.2.22.2. Para 3.2.25.: text added to emphasis applicability of the listed criteria for VFR-approaches. Para 3.2.27.1. to 3.2.27.3.: text added to allow for aspects of Cock-pit/Crew Resource Management. Para 3.2.28.1. to 3.2.28.3.: text added to allow for aspects of Cockpit/ Crew Resource Management. Para 3.2.29.2.1.to 3.2.29.2.3.: deleted term “Critical Action Procedure”. Para 3.2.30.: added “Situational Awareness”. Para 3.2.30.1. to 3.2.30.2.: text added to reflect aspects of situational awareness. Para 3.2.31.2.: added “aircraft flight path”. Para 3.2.32.1. and 3.2.32.2.: reworded. Para 3.2.33.: text added to match para 2.5.3. Para 3.2.33.1.1. to 3.2.33.1.3.: text added to allow for aspects of Cockpit/Crew Resource Management. Para 3.2.33.2. text on chase requirements deleted 2.5.3. Para 3.2.34. and sub-paragraphs: deleted “Cockpit/Crew Resource Management”. Para 3.2.35.: corrected typo-graphical error. Para 3.2.35.1.: text added to describe “Q” criteria. Para 3.2.36. and sub-paragraphs: added item “Task Prioritization” and corresponding criteria. Para 3.3.1.1. to 3.3.1.2.: added “leg timing” as parameter. Para 3.3.2.. to 3.3.2.3.: added “enroute descent”. Para 3.3.4.1.: added terms ”Minimum Descent Altitude”, “Visual Descent Point”, “Missed Approach Point”. Para 3.3.5.: split criteria for PAR and ILS-approaches into 2 areas. Para 3.3.5. and sub-paragraphs: PAR only. Para 3.3.6. and sub-para-graphs: added text on ILS-approaches. Para 3.4.1.1.1.: reworded. Para 3.4.1.2.2.: changed “poor” to “low”. Para 3.4.1.3.: reworded, deleted “GCI” and “AWACS”. Para 3.4.1.5. and sub-paragraphs: changed “Radar lookout” to “Radar Mechanization” or “Radar search”. Para 3.4.1.6.1. and 3.4.1.6.3.: text added. Para 3.4.1.7.2.: High altitude and Medium Altitude grading criteria merged. Para 3.4.1.7.3. and sub-para-graphs: renumbered, reworded. Para 3.4.1.8.1. to 3.4.1.8.3.: added term “evasive maneuvers”. Para 3.4.1.11.: text added. Para 3.4.1.11.2.1.: added PET shot parameter. Para 3.4.1.12.: added term “Rules of Engagement”. Para 3.4.1.14.: deleted term “Terrain Following Radar”. Para 3.4.1.15.: added “not applica-ble for FTU”. Para 3.4.1.16. and sub-paragraphs: reworded for clarity. Para 3.4.1.18.and sub-paragraphs: added area “Sensor management”. Para 3.4.1.19.: added. Para 3.4.2.1.: changed “Radar Search” to “Radar Mechanization”. Para 3.4.2.3.: added “Combat Air” and “(CAP)”. 3.4.2.3.1. to 3.4.2.3.3.: reworded for clarity. Para 3.4.2.5.1.: reworded/text added to better cover all aspects of offensive maneuvering. Para 3.4.2.5.2.: reworded. Para 3.4.2.6.1.: text added. Para 3.4.2.7.1. to 3.4.2.7.3.: reworded for clarity. Para 3.4.2.8. and sub-paragraphs: added area “Air-to-Air Systems Employment”. Para 3.4.2.9.: added area “Command and Control Integration”. Para 3.4.3.1.1. and 3.4.3.1.2.: added “with radar and/or TGT IR and/ or visual acquisition”. Para 3.4.3.2., NOTE 3 and NOTE 4.: text added. Para 3.4.3.2.2.1. to 3.4.3.2.2.3.: examples for single event weapon scores deleted. Para 3.4.3.2.3.1. to 3.4.3.2.3.3.: tables newly formatted. Para 3.4.3.4.: and sub-paragraphs: text added. Para 3.4.3.5. and sub-paragraphs: criteria for Precision Guided Munitions Delivery Procedures added. Para 3.4.3.7. and sub-paragraphs: criteria for System Weapons Delivery Procedures (GPS Aided Weapons) added. Para 3.4.3.8. and sub-paragraphs: criteria for System Weapons Delivery Procedures (General Purpose Munitions) added. Para 3.4.3.9. and sub-para-graphs: criteria for Close Air Support/Time Sensitive Targeting added. Para 3.4.3.10.: added. Para 3.4.4.:added term “Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses”. NOTE added. Para 3.4.4.1.1.: reworded for clarity. Para 3.4.4.1.2.: deleted text. Para 3.4.4.1.3.: reworded. Para 3.4.5.2. and sub-paragraphs: changed “Photo Quality” to “Imagery Quality”; combined former areas 112 “Photo Quality” and 113 “EEI” into one area. Para 3.4.5.3.: deleted area “EEI”, added administrative text. Para 3.4.5.4.: deleted. Para 3.4.6.3.1.: changed “fighters” to read “strikers”. Para 3.4.6.4.1. to 3.4.6.4.3.: changed “fighters” to “strikers”. Para 3.4.6.5.: added text “(Type 1 control only)”. Para 3.4.6.5.1. to 3.4.6.5.3.: reworded for clarity. Para 3.4.6.6.1.: changed “fighters” to “strikers”. Para 3.4.6.6.2.: changed “fighters” to “strikers”, added text. Para 3.4.6.7.1.: changed “fighters” to “strikers”. Chapter 4 added to specify grading criteria for Emer-gency Procedures Evaluations. Para 4.3. and 4.4.: added to comply with administrative requirements. Attachment 1 references, abbreviations and acronyms updated to match corresponding text of the instruction.A bar ( | ) indicates revisions from the previous edition.Chapter 1— GENERAL INFORMATION 61.1.General (6)1.2.Waivers (6)1.3.Procedures (6)1.4.Grading Instructions (6)Table 1.1.General Criteria. (7)1.5.Emergency Procedures Evaluation (7)1.6.Documentation of Weapons Employment Results (9)Table 1.2.Weapons Employment Scores. (10)Chapter 2— EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS 112.1.General (11)2.2.Instrument/Qualification Evaluation (12)2.3.Mission Evaluation (12)2.4.Formal Course Evaluation (13)2.5.Instructor Evaluation (13)2.6.Instructor Pilot Rear Cockpit Landing Evaluations (14)Table 2.1.FLIGHT Evaluations. (15)Table 2.2.Emergency Procedure Evaluations (21)Chapter 3— FLIGHT EVALUATION CRITERIA 263.1.General Grading Standards (26)3.2.General (26)3.3.Instrument (39)3.4.Tactical Employment (42)Chapter 4— EMERGENCY PROCEDURES EVALUATION CRITERIA 574.1.General Grading Standards: (57)4.2.General: (57)4.3.Forms Prescribed (60)4.4.Forms Adopted (60)Attachment 1— GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION 61Chapter 1GENERAL INFORMATION1.1. General.All evaluations will be conducted IAW the provisions of AFI 11-202V2 and this volume.1.2. Waivers.Waiver authority for this publication is the MAJCOM DO/A3. Waivers will be requested from the parent MAJCOM Stan/Eval through appropriate channels.1.3. Procedures.1.3.1. Flight examiners (FEs) will use the evaluation criteria contained in Chapter 3for conductingflight evaluations and Chapter 4 for emergency procedure evaluations (EPE). To ensure standard and objective evaluations, flight examiners will be thoroughly familiar with the prescribed evaluation cri-teria.1.3.2. Recording devices (video tape recorders (VTR), air combat maneuvering instrumentation, etc.)should be used, when available, to reconstruct/evaluate the mission.1.3.3. Unless specified, the examinee or FE may fly in any flight position/seat (to include chase)which will best enable the FE to conduct a thorough evaluation.1.3.4. The FE will brief the examinee on the purpose of the evaluation and how it will be conductedprior to flight. The examinee will accomplish required flight planning in accordance with the flight position during the evaluation. Higher Headquarters FEs (and unit FEs as determined locally) may assist in mission planning/briefing as tasked and will be furnished a copy of necessary mission data, mission materials, and data transfer cartridge loads.1.3.5. The FE will thoroughly debrief all aspects of the evaluation. This debrief will include theexaminee's overall rating, specific deviations, area grades assigned (if other than qualified) and any required additional training.1.4. Grading Instructions.Standards and performance parameters are contained in AFI 11-202V2 and this instruction.1.4.1. The FE will base tolerances for in-flight parameters on conditions of smooth air and a stableaircraft. Do not consider momentary deviations from tolerances, provided the examinee applies prompt corrective action and such deviations do not jeopardize flying safety. The FE will consider cumulative deviations when determining the overall grade.1.4.2. When grading criteria specify that airspeed/angle of attack (AOA) be evaluated and the flightmanual lists only a minimum/maximum/recommended airspeed/AOA for that area, the examinee will brief the desired airspeed/AOA.1.4.3. The FE will compare examinee performance for each area accomplished during the evaluationwith the standards provided in this volume and assign an appropriate grade for the area. Derive theoverall flight evaluation grade from the area grades based on a composite for the observed events and tasks IAW this instruction.1.4.3.1. FEs will use the grading criteria in this volume to determine individual area grades. FE judgment must be exercised when the wording of areas is subjective and when specific situations are not covered.1.4.3.2. If the examinee receives an unqualified area grade in any of the critical areas identified by this volume, an overall qualification level of "Q-3" will be assigned.1.4.3.3. FE judgment will be the determining factor in arriving at the overall grade.1.4.3.4. The following general criteria apply during all phases of flight except as noted for spe-cific events and instrument final approaches:Table 1.1. General Criteria.1.5. Emergency Procedures Evaluation.In order of preference, the EPE will be conducted in a flight simulator/unit training device (UTD), cockpit procedure trainer (CPT), or verbally. Only conduct a verbal EPE if a flight simulator/UTD or CPT is not available or not configured appropriately for the evaluation. Grading criteria for each required item are listed in Chapter 4. This evaluation will include areas commensurate with examinee's Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) training level and event qualifications.1.5.1. The following items are required on all emergency procedure evaluations:1.5.1.1. Emergency Procedures. All Critical Action Procedures (CAP) should be evaluated.1.5.1.1.1. Evaluate a minimum of two emergency procedures, one of which is a CAP, from the Ground Emergencies Section of Chapter 3 of the T.O. 1F-16XX-1 (XX denotes model - A/C/CG/CJ). Q Altitude +/- 200 feet Airspeed +/- 5% Course+/- 5 degrees/3 NM (whichever is greater) TACAN Arc+/- 2 NM Fix-to-Fix+/- 2 NM Landing150’ to 1000’ Q- Altitude+/- 300 feet Airspeed +/- 10%Course+/- 10 degrees/5 NM (whichever is greater) TACAN Arc+/- 3 NM Fix-to-Fix+/- 3 NM Landing0-149’; 1001’ to 1500’ U Exceeded Q- limits1.5.1.1.2. Evaluate a minimum of two emergency procedures, one of which is a CAP, from theTakeoff Emergencies Section of Chapter 3 of the T.O. 1F-16XX-1.1.5.1.1.3. Evaluate both the Engine Failure/Airstart and Out Of Control Recovery CAPs andan additional emergency procedure from the In-Flight Emergencies Section of Chapter 3 of the T.O. 1F-16XX-1.1.5.1.1.4. Evaluate a minimum of two emergency procedures from Landing Emergencies Sec-tion of Chapter 3 of the T.O. 1F-16XX-1.1.5.1.1.5. All CAPs will be evaluated by completion of a written CAPs sheet at the beginningof the EPE. This will complete the CAPs requisite for the evaluation. Any incorrectly com-pleted CAP will result in a “U” for the CAPs requisite. The EPE will not be started until suc-cessful completion of the CAPs requisite.1.5.1.2. Aircraft General Knowledge.1.5.1.3. Cockpit/Crew Resource Management (CRM).1.5.1.4. Unusual Attitude Recoveries. This also fulfills the Area 15 (Unusual Attitude Recoveries)requirement for Instrument/Qualification (INSTM/QUAL) evaluations.1.5.2. All INSTM/QUAL EPEs will include the following additional items:1.5.2.1. AFMAN 11-217, Instrument Flight Procedures. Evaluate a minimum of one heads-updisplay (HUD) -out approach and use of standby/emergency instruments. Emphasis should be on whether the approach would permit a safe landing.1.5.2.2. Alternate/divert airfields. Evaluate a minimum of one approach at other than home base.1.5.3. All Mission (MSN) EPEs will include the following items (tailor MSN evaluation scenarios to unit tasking/mission).1.5.3.1. Weapons system operation.1.5.3.2. Electronic attack (EA)/Electronic Protection (EP)/All Aspect Missile Defense (AAMD).1.5.3.3. Evasive action/Threat Reaction.1.5.3.4. Weapons employment and switchology.1.5.3.5. Terrain Following Radar (TFR) procedures (if applicable).1.5.4. Examinees receiving an overall unqualified grade will be placed in supervised status until rec-ommended additional training is completed and/or a reevaluation is successfully accomplished. Examinees receiving an overall unqualified grade because of an unsatisfactory CAP accomplishment will not be permitted to fly until a successful reevaluation is accomplished. For EPEs in which the examinee is qualified, but requires additional training, the FE will indicate whether the additional training will be accomplished before the next flight. Additional training and reevaluations will be accomplished IAW AFI 11-202V2.1.5.5. Normally, an EPE will be conducted separately for the pilot INSTM/QUAL and MSN evalua-tions. In situations where INSTM/QUAL and MSN evaluation eligibility zones coincide, a single EPE may be administered to fulfill the requisites for the combined MSN/INSTM/QUAL evaluations. The combined EPE must be of sufficient scope and length to ensure all required areas for each evaluation are accomplished.1.5.6. The following grading criteria will be used to grade individual items on EPEs:1.5.6.1. Q. Performance is correct. Quickly recognizes and corrects errors.1.5.6.2. Q-. Performance is safe, but indicates limited proficiency. Makes errors of omission orcommission.1.5.6.3. U. Performance is unsafe or indicates lack of knowledge or ability.1.6. Documentation of Weapons Employment Results.Weapons employment results will be documented in the Mission Description Section of the AF IMT 8 for MSN evaluations. Include entries for each type of actual and simulated ordnance that was employed.1.6.1. Air-to-Surface. Results will be recorded as Hit or Miss for each air-to-surface record delivery.Flight examiners may use either AFI 11-2F-16V1, F-16--Aircrew Training, individual weapons events or current MAJCOM Block XX RAP tasking message events (e.g. combined events, etc.) when deter-mining grading or assigning additional training. For air scored events and/or for VTR assessed deliv-eries, FEs will determine weapons employment results. Air scored and/or VTR assessed deliveries will be annotated with an asterisk (or asterisks as required). Document results as in Table 1.2. or as by PEX format.1.6.2. Forward Air Controller (FAC) Target Marks. For the purpose of FAC target mark, marks willbe scored as a Hit or a Miss by the FE in either FAC or fighter aircraft. Marks will be scored as a "Hit"if they are considered usable for marking the designated target, delivered in a timely manner and delivery used is tactically sound. They will be scored as a "Miss" if they are unusable for target mark-ing, untimely or the deliveries are tactically unsound (i.e., excessive altitude loss, unnecessary expo-sure to the threat, excessive tracking time, etc.).1.6.3. Air-to-Air. Record the number of simulated missile/gun firing attempts and the number thatwere valid as in Table 1.2.Shot validity will be evaluated at pickle with all parameters IAW AFTTP 3-1.1.1.6.4. FE Judgment. FE judgment will be the determining factor in deciding the weapons employmentgrade. If the examinee fails to qualify in any event(s), the FE may elect to award a higher area grade than warranted by the score(s). The FE will include justification for such an award in the Comments Section of the AF IMT 8. Include entries for each type of simulated ordnance that was employed.Table 1.2. Weapons Employment Scores.Weapons employment scores were: (examples)(for abbreviations and acronyms see Attachment 1)HARB HADB LALD LAT HARM LGB*Hit **Hit Hit/Miss Hit/Hit *Hit *HitATTEMPTED V ALIDA/A Gun 2 1AIM 120 2 2 *VTR /simulator/UTD assessed /**Air ScoredNOTE:Flight examiners may use either AFI 11-2F-16V1 individual weapons events or current MAJCOM Block XX RAP tasking message events (e.g. combined events,MAD, etc.) when completing Weapons Employment Scores.。

员工消防培训手册引言近年来，人员密集场所群死群伤火灾事故时有发生，给人民生命财产造成了严重损失。

为切实吸取教训，规范这类场所的消防安全管理，遏制群死群伤火灾事故的发生，依据《中华人民共和国消防法》等相关法律法规，在研究、分析人员密集场所及其火灾特点的基础上，提出了相应的消防安全管理要求和措施，用以引导和规范此类场所的消防安全管理工作，提高其消防安全管理水平。

人员密集场所通过加强对消防安全管理人员、专职消防人员、员工的消防安全培训，提高消防安全管理水平和员工消防安全素质，规范自身消防安全管理行为，建立消防安全自查，火灾隐患自除，消防责任自负的自我管理与约束机制，达到防止火灾发生、减少火灾危害，保障人身和财产安全的目的。

员工岗前消防培训员工上岗前需经消防安全培训合格后方可上岗，并每年定期组织灭火疏散预案的演练，达到会报警、会扑灭初期火灾、会引导客人疏散、懂逃生知识等基本知识、基本技能。

员工消防安全岗前培训组织实施人为本单位。

一、有关消防法规、消防安全管理制度、保证消防安全的操作规程等；熟悉了解本单位的消防安全管理制度，制定各岗位的消防安全职责和目标工作。

规范自身及他人的用火用电管理，及时制止可能引发火灾后果的不当行为，如违规电焊、气焊、违规使用大功率用电设备、打火照明、乱扔烟头等。

二、本单位、本岗位的火灾危险性和防火措施；熟悉了解本单位的防火重点部位，重点监管和防范防火重点部位的用火用电，明确消防安全管理部门和责任人，加强熟悉演练。

仓库、可燃物众多的物品堆垛区、配电房、厨房、人员聚集区、其他特殊部位（如医院的骨折病房、产房、化学实验室等）应列为防火重点部位。

重点防火部位应严格配备消防设施，加强消防安全管理。

员工应了解防火重点部位的火灾危险性，熟悉重点防火部位的灭火器、室内消火栓的数量、位置。

防火重点部位严格规范用火用电制度，及时消除可能引发火灾的不稳定因素。

三、场所消防设施、灭火器材的性能、使用方法和操作规程；灭火器的使用：灭火器使用方法为每名员工组织实践操作。

婚介所红娘培训手册第一部分婚姻家庭基本概述一、我国婚姻的发展进程所谓婚姻――按现在的说法是嫁娶的事。

嫁和娶都是对男和女结合在一起共同生活这么一种社会现象的表述，嫁是从女方说的，娶是从男方说的，有嫁必有娶，有娶必有嫁，嫁和娶同时存在，从二者的词义上来讲，并没有男和女哪一方处于从属地位的涵义。

在婚姻法颁布以前，中国的婚姻存在以下几个特点。

1)一夫一妻多妾制。

这是对女性的一种偌大歧视，并容易造成家庭矛盾。

作为明媒正娶的妻子，往往是由父母指定的，与丈夫之间没有感情，因而受到丈夫的冷落；而妾往往是得到丈夫宠爱的人，却没有名分。

这种地位的不平等首先对妾很不公平，而感情的不平等又造成丈夫对待妻子的不公平，加上妻妾之间的争风吃醋，家庭矛盾就很难避免了。

2)父母之命、媒妁之言。

中国的婚姻不是建立在感情的基础之上，往往由于政治、经济、宗法、迷信、门第阶级等作为基础，由媒人作引、父母包办来缔结下门当户对、和谐美满的婚姻。

在这期间，男女当事人特别是女方毫无权利，往往在毫不知情的情况下，嫁做他人妇。

即使是历史上传为佳话的昭君出塞、文成公土嫁入吐蕃，女人也只是政治需要的一种牺牲品而已。

3)门当户对。

由封建社会早期“门当户对”制度演变成后来的“良贱不婚”，在历代婚姻立法中都有明确的规定。

这一观念在现代社会，在文明高度发达的现代文明中也依然发挥着作用。

195O年5月1日颁布的新中国颁布的第一部婚姻法《中华人民共和国婚姻法》。

彻底废除了几千年的封建婚姻制度，从此人们的婚姻进入了自由恋爱。

规定婚姻自由，意思是结婚的双方在法定的结婚的问题上有充分的自主的权利，无论是谁都不能强制当事入或牵涉当事人。

一夫一妻制，意思是一个男人和一个女人才能结为夫妻的制度，一个人不能同时有两个或两个以上的配偶，无论这人财产有多富有，地位有多高尚，已经登记结婚了的人在与自己的配偶离婚之前和配偶死亡之前，都是不可以在结婚的，一夫多妻和一妻夫都是违法的。

男女平等，婚姻法规定在有婚姻关系的家庭中，男女享受相同的待遇和义务。

2006年企业年度培训方案实例又到了一年一度制订培训计划的时间，在培训正式实施前，如果能够通盘考虑，制定出有计划性的培训方案，不仅能够明确培训目标，最为重要的是，合理的培训计划可以使培训管理水平得以不断提升。

下面的年度培训方案，希望能与同业者们共享，提供一些职场思路。

一、方案编制说明随着公司产业结构调整，对员工队伍的知识结构和整体素质提出了新的更高的要求，而这些问题制约了公司的发展速度。

根据公司经营战略，培训部将通过培训逐步调整员工知识结构，提高员工敬业精神，形成良好的职业道德，提高公司管理水平和员工综合素质，这也是编制本培训方案的出发点。

二、培训需求调查与分析为了使培训方案具有针对性和可操作性，在制定方案前，培训部认真进行了培训需求调查，共发放调查问卷200份，收回有效问卷186份，有效率为93%，调查结果如下：（一）对公司企业文化培训的意见培训内容希望培训培训方式公司领导授课学习教材座谈交流1、公司发展战略95% 87% 5% 8%2、企业文化90% 75% 15% 10%3、规章制度学习87% 28% 56% 16% （二）职位培训（96%希望接受培训）培训内容希望培训培训方式参加公开课内训自学教材1、业务技能75% 60% 22% 18%2、管理技巧14% 76% 24% 03、两者都培训11% 50% 40% 10% （三）提高能力培训（排名列前十位）培训内容希望培训比率1、提升管理能力57%2、专业前沿资讯45%3、人力资源管理32%4、沟通、商务礼仪28%5、财务管理20%6、市场营销技巧18%7、心理学12%8、英语、计算机8%9、法律5%10、MBA课程1%通过调查，了解到员工对企业文化、专业技能及管理能力的培训较为关注，本着“干什么学什么，缺什么补什么”的原则，制订本年度培训方案。

三、培训指导思想1、工作即培训。

培训的目的是通过“培训——工作”的结合，使员工发生有益于公司发展的变化，提高工作能力，改变工作态度，改善工作绩效，把员工培养成“企业人”，因此培训主要在工作过程中进行。