Backlund transformation and special solutions for Drinfeld-Sokolov-Satsuma-Hirota system of

  • 格式:pdf
  • 大小:88.42 KB
  • 文档页数:5

arXiv:nlin/0102001v1 [nlin.SI] 1 Feb 2001B¨acklundtransformation

andspecialsolutionsfor

Drinfeld–Sokolov–Satsuma–Hirota

systemofcoupledequations

Ays¸eKarasu(Kalkanli)∗andSYuSakovich†

DepartmentofPhysics,MiddleEastTechnicalUniversity,

06531Ankara,Turkey

Abstract

UsingtheWeissmethodoftruncatedsingularexpansions,wecon-structanexplicitB¨acklundtransformationoftheDrinfeld–Sokolov–Satsuma–Hirotasystemintoitself.Thenwefindallthespecialsolu-tionsgeneratedbythistransformationfromthetrivialzerosolutionofthissystem.

Shorttitle:B¨acklundtransformationandspecialsolutionsPACSnumbers:02.30.Ik,02.30.Jr

Thesystemoftwocouplednonlinearevolutionequations

ut+uxxx−6uux−6vx=0vt−2vxxx+6uvx=0(1)

wasintroduced,independently,byDrinfeldandSokolov[1],andbySatsuma

andHirota[2].In[1],thesystem(1)wasgivenasoneofnumerousexamples

ofnonlinearequationspossessingLaxpairsofaspecialform.In[2],the

system(1)wasfoundasaspecialcaseofthefour-reductionoftheKPhier-

archy,anditsexplicitone-solitonsolutionwasconstructed.Recently,G¨urses

andKarasu[3]foundarecursionoperatorandabi-Hamiltonianstructurefor(1),whichprovidethesystem(1)withaninfinitealgebraofgeneralized

symmetriesandaninfinitesetofconservationlaws.

Inthispaper,weconstruct,usingtheWeissmethodoftruncatedsingular

expansions[4],anexplicitB¨acklundtransformationoftheDrinfeld–Sokolov–

Satsuma–Hirota(DSSH)system(1)intoitself,andthenfindallthespecial

solutionsgeneratedbythistransformationfromthetrivialzerosolutionof

thissystem.Inrelationwithourresults,weshouldmentiontherecentpaper

ofTianandGao[5],whodidnotfindaB¨acklundtransformationof(1)into

itself,contrarytotheirclaim,andproducedarationalspecialsolutionofthe

DSSHsystemwitherroneouslymanyarbitraryparameters.

Firstofall,wefinditusefultorewritetheDSSHsystem(1)intheform

ofthesinglesixth-orderequation

wtt−wxxxt−2wxxxxxx+18wxwxxxx+36wxxwxxx−36w2xwxx=0(2)

whichisrelatedto(1)bytheMiura-typetransformation

u=wxv=1

2φ−1xφxx󰀄−1,proposedbyConte[7],simplifiesthe

computationsveryconsiderably.Following[7],wesubstitutethetruncated

expansionw=−2χ−1+a(x,t)intotheequation(2),usetheidentitiesχx=

1+12(Cxx+CS)χ2andSt+Cxxx+2SCx+CSx=0,

whereS=φ−1xφxxx−3degreesofχ,andthusobtainacomplicatedsystemofequations,whichturns

outtobecompatibleandequivalenttothefollowingnormalsystemoftwo

equationsforφandaoftotalordersix:

ax+1

3S=0at+axxx−3

2axC+3

φ+φxx

φx+a(6)

isalsoasolutionof(2).Therefore(6)representsonemoreMiura-typetransformationbetween(4)and(2).ThesetwoMiura-typetransformations,(5)and(6),togetherwiththeauxiliarysystem(4),determineanimplicit

B¨acklundtransformationbetweenthe‘new’solutionwandthe‘old’solution

zoftheDSSHsystemwrittenintheform(2)(certainly,theseterms‘new’

and‘old’canbeusedintheoppositeorder).

Now,eliminatingφandafromtheequations(4),(5)and(6),weobtain

thefollowingexplicitB¨acklundtransformationoftheequation(2)intoitself:

pt+󰀅

4pxx−3p2x4p3󰀆

x=0(7)

qt−3

p+3

p2−1

2qxpxx4pxqxx8ppxx

+3

p2−9

2q2x−3

64p4=2k(8)

wherep=w−zandq=w+z.Theequations(7)and(8)constitutea

B¨acklundtransformationinthesenseofthedefinitiongivenin[8]:ifwe

eliminatezfrom(7)and(8),weobtainexactlytheequation(2)forw;and

ifweeliminatewfrom(7)and(8),weobtain(2)forz.Wethink,however,

thatitisimpossibletoprovethisbyhand-madecomputations:wediditby

meansoftheMathematicasystem[9].Asfarasweknow,theequations(7)

3and(8)arethemostcomplicatedexplicitB¨acklundtransformationinthe

literature.

Letusfindallthe‘new’solutionswoftheequation(2)generatedby

theobtainedB¨acklundtransformationfromthetrivial‘old’solutionz=0.

Settingz=0in(7)and(8),wegetanover-determinedsystemoftwoequa-

tionsforw,whichcanbesolvedexactly,usingthenewdependentvariable

ψ:w=−2φ−1φx,φx=ψ2.Thisgivesusthefollowingfivetypesofexplicit

specialsolutionsoftheDSSHsystemwrittenintheform(2):

w=−2

x3+12t(10)

w=−30(x2+σ)2Weshouldnotice,however,thattherearenosolitarywavesolutions

amongthesolutions(9)–(13).Indeed,theonlysolutionoftheformw=

f(x−ct)(c=constant),generatedby(7)–(8)fromz=0,isthesolution

(9),forwhichc=0.Forthisreason,wesuspect(7)–(8)ofbeingnotthesim-

plest(elementary)B¨acklundtransformationoftheequation(2)intoitself:

itmightbeaproductoftwoelementaryB¨acklundtransformations;sucha

phenomenonwasobservedin[10],wheretwodifferentB¨acklundtransforma-

tionsoftheCalogeroequationwerefoundandstudied.Thispointrequires

furtherinvestigation.

TheauthorsaregratefultotheScientificandTechnicalResearchCouncil

ofTurkey(T¨UB˙ITAK)forsupport.

References

[1]DrinfeldVGandSokolovVV1981Proc.SLSobolevSeminar,vol.2

(Novosibirsk)pp5-9(inRussian)

[2]SatsumaJandHirotaR1982J.Phys.Soc.Japan513390-7

[3]G¨ursesMandKarasuA1999Phys.Lett.A251247-9

[4]WeissJ1983J.Math.Phys.241405-13

[5]TianBandGaoY-T1995Phys.Lett.A208193-6

[6]WeissJ,TaborMandCarnevaleG1983J.Math.Phys.24522-6

[7]ConteR1989Phys.Lett.A140383-90

[8]AblowitzMJandSegurH1981SolitonsandtheInverseScattering