下载文档原格式
有关简爱中人物的读后感 (推荐3篇)读后感一：《简·爱》人物形象赏析《简·爱》这部小说中，主要人物是简·爱和罗切斯特，在小说中，这两个人物形象都非常丰满和鲜明。
简·爱性格顽强，坚韧不拔，尽管她在悲惨的生活中饱经磨难，身上拥有的唯一的亲情——保姆贝丝自杀身亡，但她并没有放弃对自我的追求。
在叛逆的少女时期，她甚至为了自己的尊严而与她人明争暗斗，可以说她是一个勇敢、智慧、独立的女性形象。
无论是在贾提斯堡，还是在杏树林小学授课，或者是在她自己的职业道路中，她总是积极乐观地面对各种各样的困难。
罗切斯特同样是一个鲜明的人物形象，个性坚强，直率，喜欢开玩笑，有幽默感，但是他也有情感空虚的一面，因为这种情感空虚而寻找婚姻，但遭遇了扣押房留而变成天降横祸，顿失一切。
罗切斯特是一个不同寻常的男人，他总是试图挑战常规，寻找自己的真正内在和价值。
他认为自己的财富和地位是空洞且不重要的，为此冒险和简·爱在一起，因为他意识到，她是他所需要的，真正的爱之因缘。
总体来说，《简·爱》这个小说中的人物形象都是鲜活、真实的，读者也容易与他们产生共鸣，尤其是在当今社会中，读者可能更容易借鉴这些人物形象中所呈现的顽强和坚韧的精神，去面对日常生活中的困难。
读后感二：《简·爱》中的性别话题从《简·爱》的角度出发，性别话题是一个非常有趣的话题，因为小说中的主人公简·爱印证了许多关于女性的成见和价值观念的改变。
在小说开头的时候，简·爱被描绘成一个孤独又古怪的女孩子，这种性格对于当时的社会，尤其是女性来说，是非常不被认可的，因为传统社会对女性的要求，是必须温和、体贴、温柔、顺从且富有耐性，而简·爱却违反了这样的标准。
但随着故事的发展，简·爱的坚韧、独立、和自我肯定的品质成为她的优势，在她与罗切斯特相遇后的日子里，简·爱用她的自我肯定和勇气，打破了自己的角色囚笼，变得更加自由和自主。
简爱第十八章人物分析简爱是英国作家夏洛蒂·勃朗特的代表作之一，讲述了一个普通女孩简·爱的成长故事。
第十八章是小说中的重要章节之一，主要介绍了几个关键人物的性格特点和行为举止。
以下是对这些人物的详细分析。
1. 简·爱（Jane Eyre）简·爱是本书的女主人公，她是一个坚强、独立、聪明的女孩。
在第十八章中，简·爱正式成为了梅森夫人的家庭教师。
她展现了她的聪明才智和教育能力，受到了梅森夫人的赞赏。
简·爱的性格特点是勇敢、坚定和真实。
她不怕面对困难和挑战，坚持自己的原则和价值观。
她对待工作认真负责，善良而体贴。
她的努力和坚持为她赢得了尊重和信任。
2. 梅森夫人（Mrs. Fairfax）梅森夫人是锡德利庄园的管家夫人，也是简·爱的雇主。
她是一个温和友善的中年女性，对待简·爱非常亲切。
在第十八章中，她对简·爱的工作表现给予了高度评价，认为她是一位出色的教师。
梅森夫人的性格特点是善良、耐心和体贴。
她对待庄园的工作非常认真，对待员工和客人都很热情。
她是一个值得信赖和尊敬的人物。
3. 阿黛尔·韦尔（Adèle Varens）阿黛尔是梅森夫人的养女，也是简·爱的学生。
她是一个活泼可爱的法国女孩，但在学习方面有些困难。
在第十八章中，阿黛尔在简·爱的教导下取得了进步，展现出了她的潜力。
阿黛尔的性格特点是活泼、好奇和天真。
她对待生活充满热情，喜欢唱歌和跳舞。
她需要更多的关注和指导来发展她的才能。
4. 约翰·里弗斯（John Rivers）约翰·里弗斯是一个年轻的牧师，也是简·爱在第十八章中遇到的一个重要人物。
他是一个严肃认真的人，对待工作和信仰非常投入。
在第十八章中，他对简·爱的教育能力表示赞赏，并邀请她到印度做教师。
约翰·里弗斯的性格特点是严谨、坚定和热情。
简爱人物分析范文《简爱》是夏洛蒂·勃朗特的一部经典小说，故事讲述了一个孤儿简·爱在艰苦的环境中，通过自己的努力，最终找到了幸福。
本文将对小说中的两个主要人物进行分析，即简·爱和爱德华·罗彻斯特。
简·爱是本书的主人公，也是一位非常独立和坚强的女性。
她在小说开始时作为孤儿被送到罗沃德，一个盛满贫穷和苦难的财产，简从小就受到了各种各样的欺负和不公正的待遇。
然而，她并没有沉沦在逆境中，反而展现出了巨大的毅力和勇气。
简学习努力，自己教自己知识，尽管写作和绘画成了她的爱好。
她有一个强烈的独立精神，追求自由和平等的生活。
她拒绝了罗彻斯特向她提出的未婚妻身份，因为她宁愿保持自己的独立和尊严。
当她发现罗彻斯特已经与他的妻子结婚时，她仍然选择离开他，而不愿意成为一个三角关系中的第三者。
最终，在理智和自己内心的声音的指引下，她回到了罗彻斯特身边，并最终与他走向了幸福。
通过对简的塑造，勃朗特描绘了一个富有内涵和独立思考的女性形象。
简不仅仅是一个努力追求自己幸福的人，她也是一个不愿意受到社会规范束缚的人。
她敢于追求自己的梦想，拒绝了婚姻的不平等待遇，坚持与男性保持平等和互相尊重的关系。
她的坚韧和勇气不仅启示了自己，也启发了读者，使我们意识到每个人都能够通过自己的努力和不屈不挠的精神来争取自己应有的幸福。
与简不同，爱德华·罗彻斯特是一个富有的贵族绅士，他与简有着截然不同的生活经历和背景。
尽管他从小就受到了家庭的宠爱和教育，但他的生活没有给予他幸福。
爱德华的妻子是一个精神失常的女人，他被迫娶她，虽然他对她并没有真正的感情。
罗彻斯特是一个内向而封闭的人，过去的痛苦和不幸的经历导致了他的聪明才智和真实的情感被埋没。
然而，简的出现使他逐渐摆脱了困境，自我疗愈。
罗彻斯特对简的爱让他变得温柔而坦诚，他学会了真正的关心和倾听。
爱德华·罗彻斯特的形象展现了一个典型的英国绅士，他拥有财富、地位和教育，但内心却是孤独和空虚的。
简爱主要人物形象分析《简爱》是英国作家夏洛蒂·勃朗特的代表作之一，被誉为19世纪英国文学的经典之作。
小说通过讲述主人公简·爱的成长经历，描绘了她的内心世界与思想变迁。
在小说中，勃朗特巧妙地刻画了一系列丰满多维的人物形象，其中简·爱的形象尤为突出。
本文将从简·爱的外貌特征、性格特点以及与其他人物之间的关系三个方面展开分析，以探究简·爱的真实面貌。
首先，简·爱的外貌特征在整个小说中被反复脱胎换骨地描绘。
她有着普通的外貌，不算美，也不算丑。
勃朗特描述她为：“我儿时照镜子时，看见的一张干瘦稚气的脸依然普普通通，双眼普普通通，只是有时不知为了什么原因，会变得温柔，变得美丽。
”这种平凡而又充满魅力的外貌，无疑与她内心世界的丰富性相契合。
简·爱身上那股不服输的勇气、乐观向上的精神以及强大的求知欲，都是她外貌特征的象征与延伸。
其次，简·爱的性格特点是她塑造的一个重要元素。
她勇敢坚定、独立自主，不屈服于逆境与压力。
从孤儿院到洛威斯先生家，简·爱一直都有身不由己的命运感，但她从未屈服于命运的安排。
她积极进取，努力学习，最终成为一名权威的教师。
此外，简·爱也是一个热情奔放、直率真实的人。
她对待人生态度积极，善良热心，不畏惧困难，勇敢面对一切挑战。
她追求自由与平等，不愿意被束缚，一心渴望寻找真正的爱情与幸福。
最后，简·爱与其他人物之间的关系是小说的一个重要线索之一。
她与洛威斯先生之间的相遇与相知，是整个故事的起点。
他们之间的互相吸引、互相依赖与互相尊重，构成了小说情节的重要元素。
而简与洛威斯先生的感情经历也体现了主题与思想的展开。
另一方面，简与她的表亲约翰和雷德福先生之间的关系，则是她成长过程中的另一个重要插曲。
通过与约翰的剧烈情感碰撞与对雷德福先生的深情厮守，简·爱最终认清了自己的真爱是洛威斯先生，同时也得到了人生的成长与完善。
简爱主要人物
简爱是夏洛蒂·勃朗特创作的一部经典小说，讲述了一个普通女子简爱的成长故事。
以下是该小说的主要人物：
1. 简爱（Jane Eyre）：故事的女主角。
简爱是一个孤独、坚强和独立的女性。
她在孤儿院长大，并在罗彻斯特府成为家庭教师。
简爱与罗彻斯特先生相爱，但最终被他们之间的阶级差距和他的婚姻困境所困扰。
2. 爱德华·罗彻斯特（Edward Rochester）：故事的男主角。
他是个富有的绅士，但有着神秘的过去。
罗彻斯特先生是个复杂而吸引人的角色，他与简爱相爱，但被他曾与他人的婚姻所束缚。
3. 威尔·恩沃德（St. John Rivers）：简爱的表兄弟。
一个很有野心的牧师，他向简爱求婚，希望与她一起前往印度传教。
然而，他的感情冷漠与简爱的爱情观相悖，使她最终拒绝了他。
4. 阿黛勒·沃斯（Adele Varens）：罗彻斯特府的养女。
阿黛勒是一个法国孤儿，由罗彻斯特先生收养。
简爱担任她的家庭教师，并与她建立了亲密的关系。
5. 黛安娜·里弗斯（Diana Rivers）和玛丽·里弗斯（Mary Rivers）：简爱的表姐妹。
她们兄弟三人一起住在摩尔豪斯庄园，三人同样孤独坚强。
她们成为了简爱的支持者和朋友，并在她需要帮助的时候给予她支持。
这些主要人物塑造了《简爱》中复杂而迷人的故事，表达了勇气、爱情和对自由的追求。
简爱人物简介
在小说《简爱》中，夏洛蒂·勃朗特刻画了一系列鲜活立体的人物形象，他们各自展现出独特的性格特征和生活遭遇。
本文将介绍几位关键人物。
简·爱
简·爱是本书的女主人公，一个强烈独立，内心坚韧的女性形象。
她在小说开始时是一个孤苦伶俐，沉默寡言的孤儿。
在洛彻斯特先生的庄园工作期间，简爱向南赴历经生活的苦难残酷考验，最终找到自己的幸福和尊严。
爱德华·洛彻斯特
洛彻斯特先生是一个富有魅力的绅士，对简爱表现出深厚的感情。
但由于他的
家庭背景和旧爱贝茜的关系，他必须克服种种困难与责任，最终与简爱走到了一起。
他的经历展现了人性的复杂性和挣扎。
贝茜
贝茜是洛彻斯特先生的前未婚妻，是一个充满魅力和自信的女性形象。
她过去
的爱情故事与洛彻斯特先生的发展产生了深远影响。
尽管贝茜表现出坚强和优雅，但她最终的归宿却并非如愿。
奇维女士
奇维女士是简爱在度过孤独童年时期的监护人，她的形象展现了封建社会对妇
女地位的限制和社会等级的冷漠。
虽然她在小说中未被赋予太多戏份，但对简爱成长道路和人物塑造有着重要作用。
这四个人物形象构成了《简爱》中一个个丰富多彩的人生故事，展现了勃朗特
笔下的女性力量和对爱情的追求。
他们的成长、挣扎和奋斗充分体现了小说主题中的独立与自由。
简爱主要人物性格特点及故事情节《简爱》是英国作家夏洛蒂·勃朗特的代表作之一，讲述了一个孤儿女孩简·爱的成长历程和爱情故事。
本文将从主要人物的性格特点和故事情节两个方面展开讨论。
一、主要人物性格特点1. 简·爱简·爱是本书的主人公，也是一个非常独立和坚强的女孩。
她从小就失去了双亲，被送到了一个严苛的寄宿学校，但是她没有被这些困难击垮，反而变得更加坚强和自信。
她对自己的才华和能力非常自信，同时也对自己的价值有着清晰的认识。
她不愿意接受别人的怜悯和同情，而是希望用自己的能力赢得别人的尊重和认可。
2. 罗切斯特罗切斯特是一个富有但神秘的绅士，他的性格有着明显的矛盾性。
他有时候非常冷酷和傲慢，但是也有时候会表现出温柔和关怀。
他的过去经历给他带来了很大的创伤，这也是他性格中复杂的原因之一。
他的爱情观念非常特别，他希望找到一个能够和他平等相处的女性，而不是一个只会依附他的女人。
3. 布洛克尔斯特布洛克尔斯特是简·爱的学校同学，也是她的好友。
她的性格非常温和和善良，她对待简·爱非常友善和支持。
她的价值观和简·爱有些不同，她更加注重传统的女性角色和家庭生活，但是她仍然是一个非常值得尊敬的女性。
二、故事情节1. 简·爱的成长历程简·爱从小就失去了双亲，被送到了一个严苛的寄宿学校。
在那里，她经历了很多苦难和挫折，但是她从来没有放弃过自己的梦想和希望。
她对自己的才华和能力非常自信，同时也对自己的价值有着清晰的认识。
她的坚强和独立给读者留下了深刻的印象。
2. 罗切斯特与简·爱的爱情故事罗切斯特是一个神秘的绅士，他的性格复杂而矛盾。
他与简·爱的相遇是一个意外，但是他们很快就发现彼此的相似之处。
他们的爱情经历了很多的波折和磨难，但是他们最终克服了一切困难，走到了一起。
罗切斯特的爱情观念非常特别，他希望找到一个能够和他平等相处的女性，而不是一个只会依附他的女人。
简爱中的人物形象分析《简爱》是英国作家夏洛蒂·勃朗特所创作的一部小说，讲述了一个孤苦伶仃的小女孩简·爱在经历了一系列的磨难后，最终找到了自己的真爱罗切斯特。
小说中的人物形象丰满而立体，下面将对其中几个重要的人物进行分析。
简·爱是本小说的女主角，也是整部小说的叙述者。
她的性格坚强、聪明、善良，她从小遭受着孤独和不公平待遇，但她从不向命运低头，坚持追求自己的幸福。
她勇敢地面对困难和挫折，追求真理和自由。
她对自己和他人都保持着真诚和善意，她的内心充满了渴望和激情。
通过她的眼睛，我们看到了那个年代妇女的困境和追求自由的渴望，她代表了当时女性的一种解放意识。
爱德华·罗切斯特是一个神秘而富有吸引力的男人。
他被描绘成一个高大、强壮、英俊而富有魅力的人，但他的外表掩盖了他内心的痛苦。
他是一个复杂的角色，既有着坚定的意志和敏锐的思维，又被过去的错误困扰。
他把简视为一个平等的伴侣，并对她产生了浓厚的兴趣和感情。
他的对简的爱并没有受到她的社会地位和财富的限制，展现了他的真挚和高尚的品格。
罗切斯特夫人是罗切斯特的前妻，她因不满现实生活中的束缚而嫁给了他。
她为了自己的利益而背弃了自己的原则和良心，她的堕落和自私让人感到厌恶。
她扭曲了她对爱的理解，将之与金钱和地位联系在一起。
她的形象揭示了社会中一些虚伪的女性，她们为了追求物质利益而背弃自己的道德底线。
斯特.约翰是简的表亲，是一个虔诚而严肃的牧师。
他有着高尚的理想和朝气蓬勃的精神，一直追求着神的意愿。
他希望简能与他分享他的工作和信仰，但简却没有爱上他。
斯特.约翰的形象代表了那个时代的宗教与道德的力量，他是一位追求真理和奉献的人。
以上是《简爱》中几个重要人物的形象分析，他们构成了这部小说丰富多彩的人物画廊，从不同侧面揭示了人性的复杂和社会的现实。
每个人物都有自己鲜明的性格特点和独特的生活经历，让读者对人性和社会有了更深入的认识。
《简爱》以其卓越的人物塑造和生动的情节，成为了世界文学的经典之作。
简爱的人物形象及具体事例
《简爱》是英国女作家夏洛蒂·勃朗特创作的经典小说，主要描写了主人公简·爱的人物形象及她的经历。
下面是简爱的人物形象及具体事例：
简·爱：本书的主人公，一个身世卑微的孤儿。
她坚强、勤劳、独立，有自己的思想和个性，追求自由和平等，不屈服于阶级压迫。
例如，她在佛罗伦斯做家庭教师时，坚定地拒绝了雇主的求婚，并返回英国寻找自己的真爱。
约翰·瑞德：简爱的堂兄，一个物质主义者和保守主义者。
他认为女性的地位应该低于男性，视金钱和社会地位为一切。
例如，他在得知简爱家境贫寒时，对她的态度大为改变，认为她不配与他相爱。
罗切斯特：男主角，一个神秘而有魅力的男人。
他和简爱一样有自己的思想和个性，对待感情真诚而执着。
例如，他在得知自己的婚姻是个骗局后，毫不犹豫地选择与简爱共度余生。
婶娘·瑞德：简爱的义母，一个狂热的基督教徒。
她信仰虔诚，但也往往过于严苛和狭隘，对简爱的成长造成了一定的负面影响。
例如，她经常将简爱的想法和行为与她的宗教信仰相对立，对简爱的自由和独立产生了压抑和限制。
阿黛勒·韦尔奇：罗切斯特的养女，一个漂亮聪明的女孩。
她拥有自由、开放的思想和性格，和简爱成为了好友。
例如，她在与简爱交流时，向她展示了一种新的女性形象，即自信、独立、有思想的女性，对简爱的成长产生了积极的影响。
简爱中主要人物性格分析《简·爱》是英国小说家夏洛蒂·勃朗特所写的一部经典小说。
小说中主要人物包括简·爱、罗切斯特、阿黛勒、英先生和英太太等等。
下面我将对主要人物的性格进行分析。
首先，简·爱是小说的女主人公，她是一个坚韧、独立和勇敢的女性。
简·爱在她的早年经历中是一个受苦的孩子。
她受尽了家人的冷落和学校的虐待，但她从来没有丧失对自己的希望和自信。
她拥有坚强的意志力，为了追求自己的梦想和自尊，她不断学习，获得了丰富的知识和技能。
她渴望真爱和幸福，并敢于为自己的爱情而战斗，不受社会阶级和婚姻制度的束缚。
她对罗切斯特表达了自己的爱意，也在他温情的怀抱中找到了自己一直以来缺失的家庭的温暖和归属感。
罗切斯特是一位复杂的男主角。
他是一个聪明、富有和吸引人的男人，但他也有一些缺点。
他在外表上是吸引人的，但内心深处却隐藏着秘密。
他有点自私，在简·爱第一次向他表达爱意的时候，他并没有在第一时间给予她回应，而是选择隐瞒了自己的婚姻状态。
然而，罗切斯特的内心是善良的，他对简·爱表现出深深的爱意，并愿意为了爱情放弃自己的社会地位和财富。
最终，他接纳了自己的过去并与简·爱结婚，显示出他是一个懂得反思和改变的人。
阿黛勒是罗切斯特的私生女，也是一个关键性的人物。
她是个天真活泼的孩子，心地善良，带给罗切斯特和简·爱快乐与幸福。
她的出现使罗切斯特意识到自己过去的错误，也使得简·爱更加决心去面对现实并接受罗切斯特。
英先生是简·爱最初的雇主，在小说中他代表了旧式的家族阶级和对简·爱的困扰和限制。
他是一个严肃、保守和世俗的人。
他对简·爱没有真正的爱意，尽管他试图与她结婚，但实际上他只是将她当作一个完成家务和服侍自己的工具。
英先生在小说中的形象向我们展示了旧式社会对女性的压迫和限制。
英太太是罗切斯特的妻子，尽管她在小说中的出场时间不多，但她的形象对整个故事有重要的影响。
《简·爱》中的主要人物分析An Analysis of Key Charactersin Jane EyreContentsAbstract .................................... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... (1)Key words .................................... ... ... ... ... . ... (1)I. Introduction the Author (1)II.Introduction to the Novel (2)2.1 Social Background (2)2.2 The Novel (3)III. Analysis of the Main Characters (4)3.1 Jane Eyre (4)3.2 Edward Rochester (6)3.3 Helen Burns (7)3.4 Mrs. Reed (8)IV. Conclusion (8)References (9)摘要：本论文主要分析《简爱》中主要人物的性格特征。
不管简爱见了什么, 不管她在哪里, 她总反抗那个不公平的社会, 她从不放弃试图得到自由、独立、公平的生活和真实的爱。
由于不懈的努力她最后得到了尊严, 自由和真爱。
从小说中简的话语中我们可以分析出她的性格特征：自重、自尊、自强、自立、善良、朴实、纯洁、高尚。
这就是为什么一个纯洁的爱情故事能被广大读者喜爱的原因。
关键词：简爱罗切斯特自由独立Abstract: This article mainly analyze the character of key figures in Jane Eyre. No matter what Jane met, no matter where she was, she always rebelled against thatunfair society, she never gave up to try her best to get free, independent, fair lifeand true love. By unremitting efforts she finally got dignity, freedom and truelove. Jane’s special character ran though the whole novel. From the utterance ofJane in this novel, we can analysis her character: self respect; self esteem andsimple. This is the reason why that a pure love story loved by masses of reader. Key words: Jane Eyre Rochester free freedom independentI. Introduction to the AuthorCharlotte Bronte wrote this book. Charlotte Bronte was born on April 21, 1816, at Thomton, Yorkskire. She was the third child of Patrick Bronte, Curate of Hawoth. When Charlotte was very young, her mother died, leaving behind six children. Charlotte and three of her sisters were sent away to Cowan Bridge school .Where conditions were very harsh. The two oldest sisters died there and Charlotte and Emily returned home. They wrote what has become know as the “Bronte juvenilia “Stories of imaginary words in miniature books. Charlotte Bronte is one of those author whose life has attracted as much attention as her writing. Charlotte and her family have been the subject of many books, a stage play, and a film by the French director Truffaut for same people, interest in Bronte family is almost on the level of a cult, and there are even organized tours to the place associated with the family’s h istory.Charlotte attended Clergy Daughter's School in Lancashire in 1824. She returned home next year because of the harsh conditions. In 1831 she went to school at Roe Head, where she later worked as a teacher. However, she fell ill, suffered from melancholia, and gave up this post. Charlotte's attempts to earn her living as a governess were hindered by her disabling shyness, her ignorance of normal children, and her yearning to be with her sisters.Undeterred by her own rejection, Charlotte began Jane Eyre, which appeared in 1847, and became an immediate success. Charlotte dedicated the book to William Makepeace Thackeray, who described it as 'the masterwork of a great genius'. The heroine is a penniless orphan who becomes a teacher, obtains a post as a governess, inherits money from an uncle, and marries after several turns of the plot the Byronic hero. It was followed by Shirley (1848) and Villette (1853), based on her memories of Brussels. Although her identity was well known, Charlotte continued to publish as Currer Bell. Her tragedy, Belisarius, is lost.In Jane Eyre the author used her experiences at the Evangelical school and as governess. The novel severely criticized the limited options open to educated but impoverished women, and the idea that women "ought to confine themselves to making puddings and knitting stockings, to playing on the piano and embroidering bags." Jane's passionate desire for a wider life, her need to be loved, and her rebellious questioning of conventions, also reflected Charlotte's own dreams. Jane is an Ugly Duckling, who fulfills all the teenage romantic dreams of passion that breaks all obstacles. The gloomy hero, Mr. Rochester, represents a woman man: the ideal of masculine tenderness is combined with amassively masculine strength of character along Byronic lines. Jane's discovery at the altar that Rochester has an insane wife hidden in the attic is the most shocking plot twist of the novel. Bronte hints that Mrs. Rochester is a nymphomaniac. Her character was refreshed in Jean Rhys' novel Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) which told the story of Rochester's ill-fated Creole wife.II. Introduction to the Novel2.1 Social BackgroundIn the Victorian social and cultural context, woman was defined as “sexually pure”, “passive”, “dependent”, “self-denying” and “the other.”In her introduction to an anthology of essays on the Victorian woman, Martha Vicinus points out that the Victorian “perfect lady” should conform to the following ideal model of femininity: Before marriage, a young girl was brought up to be perfectly innocent and sexually ignorant. Once married, the perfect lady did not work. Her social and intellectual growth was confined to the family and close friends. Her status was totally dependent upon the economic position of her father and then her husband. Throughout the Victorian period the ‘perfect lady’ as an ideal of femininity was tenacious and all-pervasive. The married women, as Vicinus mentions, within the Victorian culture were confined to the domestic sphere. As to the duties of women, that woman had to sacrifice herself to serve her husband and children and to some extent she must be “enduringly, incorruptibly good, instinctively, infallibly wise—wise not for self-development, but for self-renunciation, wise not with the narrowness of insolent and loveless pride, but with the passionate gentleness of an infinitely variable… modesty of service”. She should be restricted to the domesticity to offer the modest service for her husband, and set up a good model to guide her children. Furthermore, she should be educated, but the purpose of it is to make her capable of appreciating the conversation of her husband, rather than share her own feelings with him.A woman, in any rank of life, ought to know whatever her husband is likely to know, but to know it in a different way. To sum up, the Victorian women are submissive wives for their husbands and good mothers for their children.In addition to the above-mentioned opinions that helped to constitute the Victorian ideal image of womanhood in the Victorian society, the Bible was also adopted by Victorian patriarchy to impose the notions of self-denial, sexual purity and submission on women, and to legitimatize men’s superiority and rule over women. From the Bible, menand women could deduce the ideal pattern the Creator had created at the beginning of the world.2.2 The NovelWe know Jane Eyre was written in 1847, 159 years ago. Jane Eyre is the classic love story.The heroine of the novel, Jane Eyre lost her parents when she was only a baby and became an orphan. She was sent into Gateshead Hall, her uncle Reed’s. However, her aunt, Mrs. Reed treated her cruelly after Mrs. Read had died. Jane received lots of neglect and abuse. At Thornfield, though Jane was humble and plain, but the master of Thornfield, Mr. Rochester still loved her because of her intelligent speaking, independent attitude and courageous behavior. Jane also loved Rochester because he treated her equally. They planned to marry. On the wedding day at the church, a stranger called Mason appeared. Mr. Mason declared the existence of an impediment to the marriage. He said Rochester married Mason’s sister. Mason’s sister was mad and locked in a room of Thornfield. Now, Jane has no choice but to leave Thornfield. Jane roamed for two days and was accepted by St John Rivers and his sisters. Then Jane got inheritance from her Uncle John Eyre. She shared the inheritance with her cousins. Mr. St John decided to go India as a missionary. He asked Jane to go with him. Jane refused St John’s suggestion of marriage, because she knew what St John love was God, not her. Finally, she seemed to hear Rochester’s call, she retuned to Thornfield. But now, Thornfield was ruined in a big fire. Rochester’s mad wife died and Mr. Rochester was already blind eyes, with only one arm left. In spite of Rochester’s disability, Jane married him. From then on, they lived a happy life.III.Analysis of the Main Characters3.1 Jane EyreThe development of Jane Eyre’s character is central to the novel. From the beginning, Jane possesses a sense of her self-worth and dignity, a commitment to justice and principle, a trust in God, and a passionate disposition. Her integrity is continually tested over the course of the novel, and Jane must learn to balance the frequently conflicting aspects of her so as to find contentment.An orphan since early childhood, Jane feels exiled and ostracized at the beginning of the novel, and the cruel treatment she receives from her Aunt Reed and her cousins only exacerbates her feeling of alienation. Jane and Mrs. Reed had a face-to-face conflict. Hereis Jane’s thought in her heart: ‘yet in what darkness was the mental battle fought! I could not answer the inward question—why I thus suffered.’(Chapter 2 p.8) According to this sentence it seems, we can straight into the inner side of the figures, see the soul of oneself —simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. In Lowood School, Jane’s body and soul were deeply hurt. Here she remained in it for eight years; six as its pupil and two as teacher. Helen Burns is Jane’s good friend. Thus Jane says to Helen Burns:‘to gain some real affection from you, or Miss Temple, or any other whom I truly love, I would willingly submit to have the bone of my arm broken, or to let a bull toss me, or to stand behind a kicking horse, and let it dash its hoof at my chest’(Chapter 8 p.53).Afraid that she will never find a true sense of home or community, Jane feels the need to belong to somewhere, to find “kin,” or at least “kindred spirits.” This desire tempers her equally intense need for autonomy and freedom. This explains Jane was a born resister.As Jane says: ‘I am my husband’s life as fully as he is mine…To be together is for us to be at once as free as in solitude, as gay as in company…. We are precisely solitudes in character perfect concord is the result’ (Chapter 38 p.378). I think her fear of losing her autonomy motivates her refusal of Rochester’s marriage proposal. On the other hand, her life at Moor House tests her in the opposite manner. There, she enjoys economic independence and engages in worthwhile and useful work, teaching the poor; yet she lacks emotional sustenance. Jane knows their marriage would remain loveless. So, she refused St. John’s proposal marriage. For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. Jane’s manners, sophistication, and education are those of an aristocrat, because Victorian governesses, who tutored to possess the ‘culture’ of the aristocracy.Jane’s understanding of the double standard crystallizes when she becomes aware of her feelings for Rochester; she is his intellectual, but not his social equal. After the interrupted wedding to Rochester, Jane describes her state of mind:a Christmas fort had come at mid summer: a white December storm had whirled over June; ice glazed the ripe apples, drifts crushed the blowing roses; on hay field and cornfield lay a frozen shoran…and the woods, which twelve hours since waves leafy and fragrant as groves between the tropics, now spread, waste, wild, and white as pin forests in wintry Norway, my hopes were all dead… (Chapter 26 p.244).Finally, at Moor House, St, John’s frigidity and stiffness were established through comparisons with ice and cold rock. Jane writes: ‘by degrees, he acquired a certain influence over me that took away my liberty of mind…I fell under a freezing spell’(Chapter 34 p.336). When St, John proposes marriage to Jane, his comrade, all would be right…But as his wife at his side always, and always restrained, and always forced to keep the fire of my nature continually low, to compel it to burn inwardly and never utter a cry, though the imprisoned flame consumed vital after vital this would be unendurable. After Jane and Rochester’s wedding is cancelled, Jane finds comfort in the moon, which appears to her in a dream as a symbol of the matriarchal sprit. She shows us: it spoke to my spirit; immeasurably distant was the tone, yet so near, it whispered in my heart my daughter, flee temptation. Jane answers,‘mother, I will’ (Chapter 27 p.265). Waking from the dream, Jane leaves Thornfield. Jane was a tutor; she was born in low class of society and common -looking. Why she could attract wealthy Rochester? He loved Jane very much. We knew that Jane was a self-respect, self-esteem, kind and independent woman. Though she met difficulty, but she did not lose her way. She was not beautiful, but she was kindhearted, simple, pure and noble. She was not a little coddle and hypocritical. Especially her noble nature of moral character. Her love to Rochester was genuine and not selfish. When she knew Rochester’s wife was still alive, her left Rochester. Because her love to Rochester was genuinely true, so she left. She bared all the painfulness and sadness silently when she refused St. John’s proposed marriage. Jane thought that without love marriage was terrible and despicable. Certainly, Jane’s choice depended on her character. Though Jane was weak, but she was very brave. Jane struggled continually for equally and to fight against oppression. In addition to class hierarchy, she must fight against patriarchal domination against those who believe women to be his ‘prop and guide’. (Chapter 12 p.91)In her search for freedom, Jane also struggles with the question of what type of freedom she wants. While Rochester initially offers Jane a chance to liberate her passions, Jane comes to realize that such freedom could also mean enslavement—by living as Rochester’s mistress, she would be sacrificing her dignity and integrity for the sake of her feelings. St. John Rivers offers Jane another kind of freedom: the freedom to act unreservedly on her principles. He opens to Jane the possibility of exercising her talents fully by working and living with him in India. Jane eventually realizes, though, that thisfreedom would also constitute a form of imprisonment, because she would be forced to keep her true feelings and her true passions always in check.Charlotte Bronte may have created the character of Jane Eyre as a means of coming to terms with elements of her own life. Much evidence suggests that Bronte, too, struggled to find a balance between love and freedom and to find others who understood her. At many points in the book, Jane voices the author’s then-radical opinions on religion, social class, and gender.3.2 Edward RochesterDespite his stern manner and not particularly handsome appearance, Edward Rochester wins Jane’s heart, because she feels they are kindred spirits, and because he is the first person in the novel to offer Jane lasting love and a real home. Although Rochester is Jane’s social and economic superior, and although men were widely considered to be naturally superior to women in the Victorian period, Jane is Rochester’s intellectual equal. Moreover, after their marriage is interrupted by the disclosure that Rochester is already married to Bertha Mason, Jane is proven to b e Rochester’s moral superior.Rochester regrets his former libertinism and lustfulness; nevertheless, he has proven himself to be weaker in many ways than Jane. Jane feels that living with Rochester as his mistress would mean the loss of her dignity. Ultimately, she would become degraded and dependent upon Rochester for love, while unprotected by any true marriage bond. Jane will only enter into marriage with Rochester after she has gained a fortune and a family, and after she has been on the verge of abandoning passion altogether. She waits until she is not unduly influenced by her own poverty, loneliness, psychological vulnerability, or passion. Additionally, because Rochester has been blinded by the fire and has lost his manor house at the end of the novel, he has become weaker while Jane has grown in strength—Jane claims that they are equals, but the marriage dynamic has actually tipped in her favor.3.3 Helen BurnsHelen Burns, Jane’s friend at Lowood School, serves as a foil to Mr. Brocklehurst as well as to Jane. Yet, over the course of the book, Jane must learn how to gain love without sacrificing and harming herself in the process ‘yet it would be your duty to bear it, if you could not avoid it; it is weak and silly to say you cannot bear what it is your fate to be required to you’. The sentence gives Jane help in her after life. Helen Burns tell her ‘life appears to me too short to be spent in nursing animosity or registering wrongs’. Helen canmake Jane clam. While Mr. Brocklehurst embodies an evangelical form of religion that seeks to strip others of their excessive pride or of their ability to take pleasure in worldly things, Helen represents a mode of Christianity that stresses tolerance and acceptance. Brocklehurst uses religion to gain power and to control others; Helen ascetically trusts her own faith and turns the other cheek to Lowood’s harsh policies.In this unfair society, Hallen, a clever, intelligent and beautiful girl received curse and beat, finally lost her young life. However, she had no hate to anyone. Religion poisoned her mind deeply. She believed in God. She spoke to Jane‘I believe God is good, I can resign my immoral part to him without any misgiving. God is my father, God is my friend: I love him, I believe he love me.’ Just because of these ideas, Hallen hadn’t a little rebel against that kind of cruel treatment. However, Jane was not like Hallen. She always tried to revolt, thought she was still a child, she told Hallen ‘ if people were always kind and obedient to those who are cruel and unjust, the wicked people would have it all their own way, they would never feel afraid, and so they would never alter, but would grow worse and worse, when we are struck at without a reason, we should strike back again very hard; I ‘m sure we should—so hard as to teach the person who struck us never to do it again.’Although Helen manifests certain strength and intellectual maturity, her efforts involve self-negation rather than self-assertion, and Helen’s submissive and ascetic nature highlig hts Jane’s more headstrong character. Like Jane, Helen is an orphan who longs for a home, but Helen believes that she will find this home in Heaven rather than Northern England. And while Helen is not oblivious to the injustices the girls suffer at Lowood, she believes that justice will be found in God’s ultimate judgment—God will reward the good and punish the evil. Jane, on the other hand, is unable to have such blind faith. Her quest is for love and happiness in this world. Nevertheless, she counts on God for support and guidance in her search.3.4 Mrs. ReedJane was an orphan without any property and had to live with the help of other. Under this background, everyone looked down upon her. Even when Mrs. Reed locked her in the red room, she still wasn’t obedient. Jane exposed boldly Mrs. Reed’s lies and hypocrisy. She said ‘I am not deceitful,’ that ‘you have no pity,’ that ‘you are deceitful.’Jane suffered wreck on body and torment in spirit, her heart was filled with fury. Though her strength was weak, in the face of strong oppressors, she was considering how to attack. Due to Jane’s true exposure, Mrs. Reed felt afraid, Jane got a little victory in spirit.In those days at Gateshead Hall, Jane’s strong, bravery, unbending characters were expressed step by step. Her every behavior showed her great indignation. Isolation, poverty, discrimination and oppression caused her to revolt the unfair society with her own way. Because of revolt, Jane was driven away from Gateshead to Lowood Institution.IV. ConclusionSome critics and reviewers suggest that Jane doesn’t actually subvert traditional norms but rather reinforces them. Here I summit some points. First, in Reflecting Jane Eyre, pat Macpherson asserts Jane’s change which from a bad girl who demolishes the Victorian verities, especially girlhood to a good woman. The charity Institution—Lowood is the most important place that offers Jane the way to become a self-controlled and good woman. In the institution the rebellious Jane learns from Miss Temple and Helen Burns and becomes a good woman. Second, Tina Politi argues that Jane Eyre is not a story of rebellion. She thinks Jane’s rebelliousness is only shown in the first five chapters, and the novel ends by celebrating Jane and her upper-class master----Rochester meeting again and they have a happy ending.But I really want to debate with the critics. And this is the reason I reread the novel and give the thesis to prove that Jane is subversive to the traditional roles of woman because she transgresses the traditional gender roles and threatens established social norms.Jane is a special woman in possession of certain characteristics far ahead of the Victorian age. In spirit, she aspires for equal and true love. She breaks the restraints of physical appearance, social status and property and she identifies herself with an independent realm of psychological energy and innate capability. Her smallness makes her vulnerable, yet, the paradox of a strong, resolute, rebellious spirit beneath the fragile exterior. Jane always keeps her pride and dignity and is reluctant to make her spiritual independence overwhelmed by the economic situation. She does not allow herself to be wavered by authority or power. She makes her own choices and takes any results the choice might produce without regrets. In pace with the process of her growth and maturity, Jane eventually comes to win her spiritual independence.Today, the novel also bears contradictory readings. After revisiting the novel, I want to draw the conclusion that the opposition of femininity and masculinity is culturally constructed, rather than a natural and fixed fact. The gender power relation of female subordination and male domination is defined or ensured by the dominators to achievetheir own interests through various cultural institutions such as family, school, religion, law, etc.References1. Wu Weiren, 1997.History and Anthology of English Literature, [M] Foreign and studiesprinting House.2. 杰夫，《外国文学名著》[M] 中国纺织出版社 2004年9月3. 杨静远，《勃朗特姐妹的生平与创作》[J] 1986年第二期4. 张佰香，《英国文学教程》[M] 武汉大学出版社 2005年3月。
