下载文档原格式
奥巴马罗姆尼第一场电视辩论-中文稿时间：2012年10月3日地点：科罗拉多州，丹佛市，丹佛大学玛格里斯运动场主持人：美国公共广播公司（PBS）“新闻时间”主持人吉姆·莱雷尔（Jim Lehrer）莱雷尔：晚上好。
这里是科罗拉多州丹佛市的丹佛大学玛格里斯运动场。
我是美国公共广播公司《新闻时间》节目主持人吉姆·莱雷尔。
欢迎大家来到2012年总统大选第一次辩论会。
今天辩论双方是民主党候选人、现任总统巴拉克·奥巴马和共和党候选人、前马萨诸塞州州长米特·罗姆尼。
本场以及后面的三场辩论--两场总统辩论和一场副总统辩论--是由总统辩论委员会资助的。
今天晚上的90分钟辩论将围绕国内议题、根据总统辩论委员会规划的形式进行。
辩论由六个部分组成，每个部分大约15分钟。
在每个部分里，辩论双方各花两分钟回答第一个问题，然后就该部分其余问题进行自由辩论。
很多人士通过互联网或其他途径就每部分要讨论的题目提出了各种建议，但是这些议题是由我来挑选的。
在此我声明，这些议题并未提交辩论委员会或候选人筛选。
提前声明，三个部分关于经济议题，其余三个分别是关于医疗服务、政府功能和社会治理议题的。
每个部分都会强调辩论双方的不同意见、具体想法和政策选择。
辩论双方还将各有两分钟的结辩。
现场观众已承诺保持安静。
辩论时不要有喝彩、掌声、嘘声以及其他分散注意力的噪声，确保大家能够把注意力集中到聆听候选人的发言上。
现在，整个辩论会只有现在才允许发出与辩论无关的声音：热烈欢迎奥巴马总统和罗姆尼州长。
（欢呼。
掌声）欢迎你们，两位先生！现在开始第一部分，辩论经济议题。
关于如何创造就业机会，两位主要有什么不同呢？你们都将有两分钟时间陈述观点。
根据抽签顺序，您先请，总统先生。
创造就业机会奥巴马：好的。
谢谢你给我这个机会，吉姆。
我还想感谢罗姆尼州长和丹佛大学的热情。
今晚我想说的很多，但其中最重要的一点，就是20年前米歇尔·奥巴马同意嫁给我，使我成为世界上最幸运的人。
SCHIEFFER: Let's -- let's go to the next segment, because it's a very important one. It is the rise of China and future challenges for America. I want to just begin this by asking both of you, and Mr. President, you -- you go first this time. What do you believe is the greatest future threat to the national security of this country?OBAMA: Well, I think it will continue to be terrorist networks. We have to remain vigilant, as I just said. But with respect to China, China is both an adversary, but also a potential partner in the international community if it's following the rules. So my attitude coming into office was that we are going to insist that China plays by the same rules as everybody else.I know Americans had seen jobs being shipped overseas; businesses and workers not getting a level playing field when it came to trade. And that's the reason why I set up a trade task force to go after cheaters when it came to international trade. That's the reason why we have brought more cases against China for violating trade rules than the other -- the previous administration had done in two terms. And we've won just about every case that we've filed, that has been decided.OBAMA: In fact, just recently steelworkers in Ohio and throughout the Midwest -- Pennsylvania -- are in a position now to sell steel to China because we won that case. We had a tire case in which they were flooding us with cheap domestic tires -- or -- or cheap Chinese tires. And we put a stop to it and as a consequence saved jobs throughout America. I have to say that Governor Romney criticized me for being too tough in that tire case; said this wouldn't be good for American workers and that it would be protectionist. But I tell you, those workers don't feel that way. They feel as if they had finally an administration who was going to take this issue seriously.Over the long term, in order for us to compete with China, we've also got to make sure, though, that we're taking --taking care of business here at home. If we don't have the best education system in the world, if we don't continue to put money into research and technology that will allow us to create great businesses here in the United States, that's how we lose the competition. And, unfortunately, Governor Romney's budget and his proposals would not allow us to make those investments.SCHIEFFER: All right. Governor?ROMNEY: Well, first of all, it's not government that makes business successful. It's not government investments that makes businesses grow and hire people. Let me also note that the greatest threat that the world faces, the greatest national security threat is a nuclear Iran.Let's talk about China. China has an interest that's very much like ours in one respect, and that is they want a stable world. They don't want war. They don't want to see protectionism. They don't want to see the world break out into -- into various forms of chaos, because they have to -- they have to manufacture goods and put people to work and they have about 20,000 -- 20 million, rather, people coming out of the farms every year coming into the cities, needing jobs.So they want the economy to work and the world to be free and open. And so we can be a partnerwith China. We don't have to be an adversary in any way, shape or form. We can work with them, we can collaborate with them, if they're willing to be responsible.Now, they look at us and say, Is it a good idea to be with America? How strong are we going to be? How strong is our economy? They look at the fact that we owe 'em a trillion dollars and owe other people $16 trillion in total, including that.ROMNEY: They look at our -- our decision to -- to cut back on our military capabilities. A trillion dollars. The secretary of defense called these trillion dollars of cuts to our military devastating. It's not my term, it's the president's own secretary of defense called these trillion dollars of cuts to our military devastating. It's not my term, it's the president's own Secretary of Defense, called them devastating.They look at America's commitments around the world and they see what's happening, and they say, well, OK. Is America going to be strong? And the answer is, yes, if I'm president, America will be very strong.We'll also make sure that we have trade relations with China that work for us. I've watched year in and year out as companies have shut down and people have lost their jobs because China has not played by the same rules, in part by holding down artificially the value of their currency. It holds down the prices of their goods. It means our goods aren't as competitive and we lose jobs. That's got to end.They're making some progress; they need to make more. That's why on day one, I will label them a currency manipulator, which allows us to apply tariffs where they're taking jobs. They're stealing our intellectual property, our patents, our designs, our technology, hacking into our computers, counterfeiting our goods.They have to understand we want to trade with them. We want a world that's stable. We like free enterprise, but you’ve got to play by the rules.SCHIEFFER: Well, Governor, let me just ask you. If you declare them a currency manipulator on day one, some people are -- say you're just going to start a trade war with China on day one. Is that -- isn't there a risk that that could happen?ROMNEY: Well, they sell us about this much stuff every year, and we sell them about this much stuff every year. So it's pretty clear who doesn't want a trade war. And there's one going on right now, which we don't know about it. It's a silent one. And they're winning. We have enormous trade imbalance with China, and it's worse this year than last year, and it's worse last year than the year before. And so we have to understand that we can't just surrender and lose jobs year in and year out. We have to say to our friend in China, look, you guys are playing aggressively. We understand it. But this can't keep on going. You can't keep on holding down the value of your currency, stealing our intellectual property, counterfeiting our products, selling them around the world, even to the United States.I was with one company that makes valves and -- and process industries and they said, look, we were -- we were having some valves coming in that -- that were broken and we had to repair them under warranty and we looked them and -- and they had our serial number on them. And then we noticed that there was more than one with that same serial number. They were counterfeit products being made overseas with the same serial number as a U.S. company, the same packaging, these were being sold into our market and around the world as if they were made by the U.S. competitor. This can't go on.I want a great relationship with China. China can be our partner, but -- but that doesn't mean they can just roll all over us and steal our jobs on an unfair basis.OBAMA: Well, Governor Romney's right, you are familiar with jobs being shipped overseas because you invested in companies that were shipping jobs overseas.And, you know, that's -- you're right. I mean that's how our free market works. But I've made a different bet on American workers.If we had taken your advice Governor Romney about our auto industry, we'd be buying cars from China instead of selling cars to China.If we take your advice with respect to how we change our tax codes so that companies that earn profits overseas don't pay U.S. taxes compared to companies here that are paying taxes.Now that's estimated to create 800,000 jobs, the problem is they won't be here, they'll be in places like China.And if we're not making investments in education and basic research, which is not something that the private sector is doing at a sufficient pace right now and has never done, then we will lose the (inaudible) in things like clean energy technology.Now with respect to what we've done with China already, U.S. exports have doubled since I came into office, to China and actually currencies are at their most advantageous point for U.S. exporters since 1993.We absolutely have to make more progress and that's why we're going to keep on pressing.And when it comes to our military and Chinese security, part of the reason that we were able to pivot to the Asia-Pacific region after having ended the war in Iraq and transitioning out of Afghanistan, is precisely because this is going to be a massive growth area in the future.And we believe China can be a partner, but we're also sending a very clear signal that America is a Pacific power; that we are going to have a presence there. We are working with countries in the region to make sure, for example, that ships can pass through; that commerce continues. And we're organizing trade relations with countries other than China so that China starts feeling morepressure about meeting basic international standards.That's the kind of leadership we've shown in the region. That's the kind of leadership that we'll continue to show.ROMNEY: I just want to take one of those points, again, attacking me as not talking about an agenda for -- for getting more trade and opening up more jobs in this country. But the president mentioned the auto industry and that somehow I would be in favor of jobs being elsewhere. Nothing could be further from the truth.I'm a son of Detroit. I was born in Detroit. My dad was head of a car company. I like American cars. And I would do nothing to hurt the U.S. auto industry. My plan to get the industry on its feet when it was in real trouble was not to start writing checks. It was President Bush that wrote the first checks. I disagree with that. I said they need -- these companies need to go through a managed bankruptcy. And in that process, they can get government help and government guarantees, but they need to go through bankruptcy to get rid of excess cost and the debt burden that they'd -- they'd built up. And fortunately...(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: Governor Romney, that's not what you said...(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: Governor Romney, you did not...ROMNEY: You can take a look at the o..(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: You did not say that you would provide government help.ROMNEY: I said that we would provide guarantees, and -- and that was what was able to allow these companies to go through bankruptcy, to come out of bankruptcy. Under no circumstances would I do anything other than to help this industry get on its feet. And the idea that has been suggested that I would liquidate the industry, of course not. Of course not.(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: Let's check the record.(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: That's the height of silliness...(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: Let -- let -- let's...(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: I have never said I would liquidate...(CROSSTALK)OBAM: ...at the record.(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: ...I would liquidate the industry.(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: Governor, the people in Detroit don't forget.(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: ...and -- and that's why I have the kind of commitment to ensure that our industries in this country can compete and be successful. We in this country can -- can compete successfully with anyone in the world, and we're going to. We're going to have to have a president, however, that doesn't think that somehow the government investing in -- in car companies like Tesla and -- and Fisker, making electric battery cars. This is not research, Mr President, these are the government investing in companies. Investing in Solyndra.This is a company, this isn't basic research. I -- I want to invest in research. Research is great. Providing funding to universities and think tanks is great. But investing in companies? Absolutely not.(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: Governor?ROMNEY: That's the wrong way to go.(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: The fact of the matter is...ROMNEY: I'm still speaking. So I want to make sure that we make -- we make America more competitive.OBAMA: Yeah.ROMNEY: And that we do those things that make America the most attractive place in the world for entrepreneurs, innovators, businesses to grow. But you're investing in companies doesn't do that. In fact it makes it less likely for them to come here...OBAMA: Governor?ROMNEY: ...because the private sector's not going to invest ina...(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: I'm -- I'm -- I'm happy.(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: pany...(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: ...to respond to you...(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: ...if -- if you're...(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: ...you've had the floor for a while.(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: ...get someone else's. OBAMA: The -- look, I think anybody out there can check the record. Governor Romney, you keep on trying to, you know airbrush history here. You were very clear that you would not provide, government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy. You said that they could get it in the private marketplace. That wasn't true. They would have gone through ...ROMNEY: You're wrong...(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: ...they would have gone through a...(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: ...you're wrong.(CROSSTALK)OBAMA: No, I am not wrong. I am not wrong.(CROSSTALK)ROMNEY: People can look it up, you're right.OBAMA: People will look it up.ROMNEY: Good.OBAMA: But more importantly it is true that in order for us to be competitive, we're going to have to make some smart choices right now. Cutting our education budget, that's not a smart choice. That will not help us compete with China.Cutting our investments in research and technology, that's not a smart choice. That will not help us compete with China. Bringing down our deficit by adding $7 trillion of tax cuts and military spending that our military is not asking for, before we even get to the debt that we currently have, that is not going to make us more competitive.Those are the kinds of choices that the American people face right now. Having a tax code that rewards companies that are shipping jobs overseas instead of companies that are investing here in the United States, that will not make us more competitive. And the one thing that I'm absolutely clear about is that after a decade in which we saw drift, jobs being shipped overseas, nobody championing American workers and American businesses, we've now begun to make some real progress. What we can't do is go back to the same policies that got us into such difficulty in the first place. That's why we have to move forward and not go back.ROMNEY: I couldn't agree more about going forward, but I certainly don't want to go back to the policies of the last four years. The policies of the last four years have seen incomes in America decline every year for middle income families, now down $4,300 during your term. Twenty-threemillion Americans still struggling to find a good job. When you came to office 32 million people on food stamps. Today, 47 million people on food stamps.When you came to office, just over $10 trillion in debt, now $16 trillion in debt. It hasn't worked.You said by now we'd be at 5.4 percent unemployment. We're 9 million jobs short of that. I've met some of those people.I've met them in Appleton, Wisconsin. I met a young woman in -- in Philadelphia who's coming out of -- out of college, can't find work.I've been -- Ann was with someone just the other day that was just weeping about not being able to get work. It's just a tragedy in a nation so prosperous as ours, that the last four years have been so hard.And that's why it's so critical, that we make America once again the most attractive place in the world to start businesses, to build jobs, to grow the economy. And that's not going to happen by just hiring teachers.Look, I love to -- I love teachers, and I'm happy to have states and communities that want to hire teachers do that. By the way, I don't like to have the federal government start pushing its weight deeper and deeper into our schools. Let the states and localities do that. I was a governor. The federal government didn't hire our teachers.UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Governor?ROMNEY: But I love teachers. But I want to get our private sector growing and I know how to do it.SCHIEFFER: I think we all love teachers.(LAUGHTER)SCHIEFFER: Gentlemen, thank you so much for a very vigorous debate. We have come to the end. It is time for closing statements,。
Let me begin with something General Eisenhower said in his 1952 presidential campaign.Quote,"We must achieve both security and solvency. In fact, the foundation of military strength is economic strength," end quote.让我以艾森豪威尔将军在1952年总统竞选时说过的一句话开始："我们必须获得安全和财务偿还能力。
事实上，军事实力的基础就是经济实力。
"With that in mind, the first lead question.在脑中记住这个，让我们开始第一个引导问题。
Gentlemen, at this very moment tonight, where do you stand on the financial recovery plan?先生们，在今晚这个特别的时刻，你们在金融拯救计划中站在哪里？First response to you, Senator Obama. You have two minutes.第一个回答问题的是你，议员奥巴马。
你有两分钟时间。
OBAMA: Well, thank you very much, Jim, and thanks to the commission an d the University ofMississippi, Ole Miss, for hosting us tonight. I can't think of a more important time for us to talkabout the future of the country.奥巴马：好的，非常感谢你，吉姆，也感谢（总统竞选辩论）委员会，感谢密西西比大学今晚容纳我们。
美国总统大选：奥巴马罗姆尼首场辩论当地时间10月3日晚9时(北京时间4日早9时)，美国2012总统大选首场辩论在科罗拉多州的丹佛大学举行，目前辩论仍在进行中，首场辩论将围绕经济和国内政策为主题。
DENVER, the United States, Oct. 3 (Xinhua) -- U.S. President Barack Obama and his Republican challenger Mitt Romney on Wednesday began their first presidential debate at Denver University in Denver, Colorado, with the debate focusing on economy and domestic issues.丹佛，美国，10月3日（新华网）美国总统巴拉克·奥巴马和他的共和党对手罗姆尼在周三在丹佛大学开始了他们的首场大选辩论，辩论主题为经济和国内政策。
The debate, hosted by veteran PBS journalist Jim Lehrer, started off with a question to Obama on how he would create jobs. Obama answered it for two minutes, then Romney took his turn.本场辩论由PBS的老牌记者吉姆·赖乐主持，开场向奥巴马提出一个问题，问他如何创造工作机会，奥巴马回答了2分钟，然后罗姆尼继续。
The debate is to run for 90 minutes.本场辩论将持续90分钟。
Economy is the most important topic, as it takes up half of the time. 经济问题是最重要的话题，有半场讨论都集中在经济问题上。
经济罗姆尼：减税减少政府干预奥巴马：增税加强金融监管经济是美国大选绕不开的主旋律。
面对高达8.3%的失业率、庞大的联邦赤字以及疲弱的房地产市场，罗姆尼在竞选中主打经济牌。
他倡导自由市场，反对政府过多干预，主张削减赤字和减税。
罗姆尼强调自己成功的从商经历，自认为比对手更有能力处理好经济问题。
在此问题上，奥巴马承认情势艰难，但也强调他在两年时间内创造了350万个就业岗位。
他称自己着力扶持美国汽车业复苏，使通用公司在破产2年后再次成为全球销量第一的汽车公司，推动经济复苏。
奥巴马表示，若连任成功，将继续走注重社会福利政策的经济路线，强调增加对富人的税收、加强金融监管等措施。
两人对经济的救助措施大相径庭。
罗姆尼称奥巴马的竞选口号是“前进”，但看起来“我们一直在后退”。
而奥巴马表示，罗姆尼的经济政策延续了共和党一贯的“传统风格”，即维护大企业和高收入人群的利益。
创造就业机会：罗姆尼：减税向富人倾斜，经济更加自由，情况会好转。
在能源行业创造就业岗位（400万个）奥巴马：我认为要投资教育和培训。
有必要在国内开拓新的能源；有必要改变税收政策，确保为在美国投资的小企业提供帮助；有必要把结束两场战争省下来的钱拿出一部分重建美国；同时也有必要以平衡的方式减少赤字，以此来确保我们能够进行这样至关重要的投资。
（在社区大学创造就业岗位200万个）都认为要减少企业所得税。
减少税收的同时又要保证财政支出尽量不会有赤字。
税收问题罗姆尼：通过降低税率，减少扣税和免税来创造更多的工作岗位，进而使更多人能工作，赚取更多收入，从而为交税创造可能。
不赞同奥巴马对小企业加税，认为增加小企业的税收将会减少70万个工作岗位。
奥巴马：认为罗姆尼的计划不可行，又要减税，又要增加军费开支，这是不可能的。
而真正可行的办法是降低企业税率，同时堵住（税法）漏洞，进而可以减少企业到境外投资。
联邦赤字和债务对策罗姆尼：通过减少支出和经济增长来解决此问题。
取消一些不必要的项目（如奥巴马医改计划），取消一些公共广播的补贴；继续好的项目的建设，并在各个州实施；提高政府效率，减少雇员，合并机构和部门。
奥巴马：美国经济？1、四年前，奥巴马竞选的口号叫改变，现在回过头来看，其实是让美国变得更糟了。
2、奥巴马表面上是帮助穷人，但长期效果其实是损害穷人利益的，而罗姆尼正相反。
3、若中国真有汇率操纵，那罗姆尼来强硬制止，实际就是制止中国贱卖东西给美国。
4、对美国经济低迷负有责任的不是市场经济，而是使市场经济陷入瘫痪的政府干预。
遗憾罗姆尼落选人类已经无法阻止美国自我毁灭奥巴马幸运的是，第二次更大的危机没有在现在爆发，所以他就险中求胜，获得了连任。
他这次竞选的口号叫前进，丝毫没有要改变错误的意思了，要将错误进行到底。
所以一定会有更大的危机在等着美国，等着全世界。
人类已经没有办法阻止美国自我毁灭了问：奥巴马再次当选美国总统，你怎么看？你对奥巴马上一个任期怎么评价？宏观经济学者：奥巴马连任，罗姆尼落选，还是挺遗憾的一件事。
四年前，奥巴马竞选的口号叫改变。
现在回过头来看，其实是让美国变得更糟了。
那时候闹金融危机，奥巴马像救世主一样横空出世，大家觉得他能救经济，但实际上他采取的很多措施并不是在解决问题，而是在掩盖问题，或者说是在制造新的更大的问题。
所以你才看到他这一次四年任期要结束的时候，美国经济依然深陷泥潭，前景更暗淡。
但奥巴马幸运的是，第二次更大的危机没有在现在爆发，所以他就险中求胜，获得了连任。
他这次竞选的口号叫前进，丝毫没有要改变错误的意思了，要将错误进行到底。
而且有了选民的再次打气，未来会更理直气壮地折腾下去，所以一定会有更大的危机在等着美国，等着全世界。
不撞得头破血流，人类已经没有办法阻止美国自我毁灭了。
罗姆尼为富人说话是为穷人做事给富人减税激励把蛋糕做大奥巴马其实是带有点阶级斗争思维的，就觉得富人更富会导致穷人更穷，所以他的一个很重要的民意牌是说要多收富人的税。
而罗姆尼，在他的世界观里，富人和穷人的利益是一体的。
给富人减税，给企业家减税，吸引企业家把美国当做天堂，才能更根本地推动就业，造福于穷人问：我们来看罗姆尼的一些经济主张：降低税率，消减赤字、减少联邦预算，尤其是要减少福利、推翻奥巴马医改方案以控制不断上涨的医疗费用。
奥巴马与罗姆尼首轮辩论交锋经济议题2012-10-04 12:18:54来源: 新华网(广州)有2917人参与(5)∙新闻图片中心 |∙查看图集|（1/13）转发到微博当地时间10月3日晚，美国2012总统大选首场全国电视辩论会在科罗拉多州丹佛市举行。
∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙新华网美国丹佛10月3日电美国总统奥巴马与共和党总统候选人罗姆尼3日晚在科罗拉多州丹佛市丹佛大学举行今年美国总统选举首场总统辩论。
两位总统候选人围绕就业、税收等经济议题展开激烈辩论，双方基本上都在重复各自此前提出的观点，没有太多新意。
罗姆尼在辩论中继续攻击奥巴马执政近四年来经济政绩不佳，导致美国普通民众收入下滑，食品和油价上涨，政府赤字高攀。
罗姆尼重申帮助美国创造就业的五点计划，包括发展油气等传统能源产业，加强民众技能培训，签订新的国际贸易协定，削减联邦政府财政赤字，降低税率以刺激工商业发展等。
奥巴马为自己的经济政绩辩护，强调美国经济已经在“大萧条”以来最严重的金融危机之后恢复增长，在过去30个月间，美国私营部门已经创造了约500万个就业岗位。
奥巴马指责罗姆尼提出的减税政策倾向于富人利益，称罗姆尼的大规模减税和增加军费开支的主张将使未来十年美国新增超过5万亿美元的财政赤字，在经济不景气的当前，会使美国民众、特别是中产阶级负担加重。
双方还在能源和就业等议题上提出了各自主张。
双方都主张美国能源自给自足，但是罗姆尼攻击奥巴马给绿色能源行业提供政府补贴的做法；在增加就业问题上，罗姆尼主张以降低税率的方式扶持中小企业，以创造更多的就业机会；奥巴马坚持要对年收入高于25万美元的家庭提高税收，并为中产阶级减税，以鼓励美国中产阶级消费和创造就业岗位。
专家认为，在经济问题上双方力图说明与对方的不同，但是他们都没有为美国人开出能使美国经济走出低谷的有效良方。
与四年前相比，美国在就业、楼市复苏等多项经济指标上已有起色，但是经济复苏的步伐仍然较慢，高失业率、高财政赤字等问题仍然困扰美国。
按照计划，奥巴马与罗姆尼在大选前将举行三场公开辩论。
副总统拜登与共和党副总统候选人保罗·瑞安也将举行一场辩论。
美国大选首场电视辩论实况报道2012-10-04 11:46:07来源: 网易探索有11045人参与(10)美国媒体大选辩论前采访罗姆尼妻子据CNN报道，主持人在总统大选辩论会开始前采访了罗姆尼的妻子安·罗姆尼。
她表示，在辩论中罗姆尼需要明白，需要感觉到他应该说什么，他要相信他的胆识。
我们已经习惯了，媒体对我们有很高的要求，罗姆尼一生致力于将美国经济引领至复苏道路。
人们应该能感觉到，过去四年的经济是否变好了，他们是否需要有个人能振兴经济，人们需要一个有能力、有责任感、真正关心经济的人来领导美国。
米歇尔接受采访表示奥巴马会做到最好据CNN报道，美国第一夫人米歇尔·奥巴马接受了CNN的独家采访。
米歇尔称，从没想过，自己的结婚20周年纪念日，是与罗姆尼夫妇一起过。
她说，她就像看着自己孩子的父母一样，感到十分紧张和激动，相信奥巴马会做得很好。
奥巴马的兄弟也说，希望奥巴马在发元音的时候，鼻子不要再发出喷嚏声了。
奥巴马的优势在于，他是个很好的聆听着，很快就会做好反驳的准备。
米歇尔称，奥巴马不是很需要她的建议，他是个很好的辩手，她希望奥巴马放松，享受这场辩论。
米歇尔称，她不会批评奥巴马的辩论，她只会当一个积极的支持者，他一定会做到最好。
此外，据报道。
没有任何一位共和党总统竞选者在输掉俄亥俄州的情况下赢得选举。
奥巴马及罗姆尼顾问接受采访谈及两人经济政策区别据CNN报道，奥巴马的顾问称，总统今晚将会令尚未做最后决定的选民下定决心。
奥巴马把制造业带回了美国，并已经开始创造更多就业机会。
他说美国目前的经济形势是自大萧条以来最差的，将在未来四年内做得更好。
罗姆尼高级竞选顾问称，看罗姆尼的职业履历，不管是作为州长，还是企业家，他一向有备而来。
他今晚会谈论美国民众真正关心的问题。
两位竞选者今晚会以不同方式谈论税收问题，罗姆尼会详细谈论税收、医改等问题，以及我们该如何看待奥巴马的政策。
美国总统大选正式开始本次辩论共分六部分据CNN报道，美国总统竞选第一场辩论会已经正式开始。
主持人Jim介绍称，本次辩论分为六个部分，三节关于经济，医改、政府角色和政府治理方式各一节。
问题一：你们两人关于创造更多就业有什么区别？奥巴马首先回答称：最重要的是，20年前我成了世上最幸福的人，因为米歇尔愿意嫁给我。
在今天的纪念日，我要告诉米歇尔我爱你。
我们经受了最严重的经济危机，因为美国人民的强韧和决心，我们已经作出了改进。
今晚我们将面对的问题是，我们将走向何方。
我的观点与罗姆尼不同，我们将开发新的能源，我们将减少赤字，确保能做出更多投资。
我们将采纳新的经济爱国主义。
罗姆尼就此问题回答称：首先祝贺奥巴马先生。
过去几年内，美国人民，以及一位丹佛妇女曾问我，你能帮助我吗？我回答，我可以，但会用不同的方式，不是用奥巴马所称的方式。
我们将向拉丁美开放更多贸易活动，如果中国采取不公平竞争，我们将压制他们。
奥巴马称罗姆尼减税计划或带给中产阶级更多负担奥巴马称，过去18个月，罗姆尼一直强调他的5万亿美元减税计划，以及在军事方面的两万亿美元支出。
而独立研究机构称，罗姆尼计划的代价，是令美国中产阶级家庭平均再多支出2000美元。
罗姆尼称，奥巴马对我税收计划的评论是不准确的。
我的计划不会减少高收入人群的税收，我不会降低高收入美国人的税率。
我会降低中产阶级家庭的税率。
通过我的研究，奥巴马总统的方式才会提高税收。
小企业目前缴纳的不是企业所得税，而是个人所得税，如果我们降低这部分税率，将会创造更多就业机会。
奥巴马称，如果你按照你所说的方式降低税率，从数学角度来说，只可能给中产阶级带来更多负担。
我已经给小企业多次减税，我也说过，对年薪20万美元以上的人群，我们应该恢复之前的税率。
如此做，我们可以降低中小企业税收，所得也能用于教育和能源投资。
罗姆尼：最看重创造更多就业机会罗姆尼称，总统奥巴马希望将小企业的税率由35％提高至40％，我和一位电子产业的小企业主谈过，他要付企业税，油税等各种税收，按照奥巴马的方式，将减少70万个就业机会，而我最看重的就是创造更多就业机会。
罗姆尼还表示：“我的计划不是5万亿美元减税计划，我的计划是不增加政府赤字的减税方式，我的政策组合不会降低政府资金规模。
我的首要关注点是让失业的美国人重新工作”。
问题二：你们将会如何处理赤字问题？罗姆尼称，这不仅是经济问题，也是道德问题。
我们的后代将会为因为我们背上更多债务，我们需要减少支出，并拉动经济增长。
有些关键计划，即使需要从中国借贷，也会继续，但我不愿意持续从中国借更多钱。
奥巴马称，当我入主白宫时，我已经承担了2万亿美元债务，随后还赶上了经济危机，但我们并未因此陷入大萧条。
我于各领域共调整了77个项目，教育领域有18个项目。
我和两党合作，降低了数万亿美元政府预算。
罗姆尼称，奥巴马已经当了四年总统了，说要减少赤字，但我们目前仍有数万亿美元债务，而且每年都在增加更多债务。
在经济疲弱的时候，你不该提高税收，不该提高任何人的税收。
美国的中小企业主，你提高了他们的税率，你杀掉了很多就业机会。
罗姆尼称他的方式是让高收入人群更多工作，有更多机会，因此能缴纳更多税收。
奥巴马称，如果我们采用平衡的手段，我们不仅要考虑个税，还要考虑企业所得税。
当我们谈到企业所得税，我和罗姆尼观点相近，但我有更具体的做法，我不会奖励那些输出就业机会的企业，而会鼓励那些在国内创造就业机会的企业。
问题三：你们两人关于社保政策有什么不同？罗姆尼称，自己和总统先生都不会对将退休的人做出改变。
但奥巴马先生的政策，令部分医院不再愿意接受有医保的病人了。
我们希望既能提供公立医保计划，也推出私立医保计划，让人们可以自主选择，而不会增加负担，不会增加数千美元费用。
政府治理是必须的，市场需要管理，监管者存在市场才能正常运行。
但目前部分地区的政府监管过多了，比如说，多德弗兰克法案，很多银行因为多德弗兰克法案受到影响。
我不会废除该法案，但我会取代它。
该法案令很多地区性小型银行倒闭，它需要被修改。
奥巴马称，罗姆尼的计划是为了未来的人，而不是现在要退休的人。
他计划主旨是，将给老年人“点券”，让他们可以消费用。
但保险公司很聪明，他们能分辨谁是更健康的老年人，但身体不好的老年人则没有获得对应的支持。
如果罗姆尼废除我的医改计划，那些老年人将马上不得不多支出数千美元医药费。
我们走入经济危机的部分原因，就是很多不安分的行为，不光是华尔街上的那些问题。
很多银行家赚了大钱，但并不真正了解其金融产品，令金融系统更加脆弱。
罗姆尼刚提到，他希望废除多德弗兰克法案，这不是你们想看到的。
问题四：你们两人对医保有什么不同看法？罗姆尼称，希望废除奥巴马医保计划。
他表示，一位妇女跟他说，她希望取消医保，因为没钱缴纳。
奥巴马的法案增加了民众和家庭的负担，很昂贵，另外他的法案降低了政府在医保方面的支出，我希望把减少的钱重新投入该领域。
我不知道总统怎么能面对如此高的失业率，如此高昂的物价，还推出这样的医保法案。
而奥巴马表示：“4年前我竞选时，我四处演讲，也说了罗姆尼刚说的这些话。
让我们政府赤字激增的不是这项计划。
现在的医保法案推出前，有些家庭买了医保，很多保险公司也会硬性设置数额，让那些重病者不能获得足够的补贴。
我的医保法案降低了人们缴费的额度，而且让他们有了保障。
”问题五：关于政府治理和政府角色罗姆尼表示：政府的角色是提供生活和自由，我不相信削减军力，我相信保持军力。
我认为我们应保持对宗教自由的宽容，我们希望那些无力照顾自己的人能受到照顾；我们希望保持探索，创新。
我们相信，应该让个人可以追求梦想。
目前的状况是数千万人失业，没法发挥个人才能。
联邦政府也可以做些地方政府层级的事务，比如为地方教育服务。
奥巴马称，预算的重要性就体现在此处，罗姆尼希望减少税收，影响就将体现在诸如教育等方面。
我作为总统，为学生贷款提供更多支持，让数百万学生能享受低利率的学生贷款。
罗姆尼的政策，不会让我这样的人、米歇尔这样的人、和丹佛大学的学生们那样的人享受到同样的福利。
罗姆尼称：我不会削减教育经费，你说的是按照你的数据，但我承认你说的是个有意义的观点。
美国政府的角色，不该是作为选择者，挑出胜利者和失败者，提出医改法案等。
政府的角色，应该是令私营部分更有活力。
此外，我不是只是说说，我有实践经验，我在马塞诸塞州已经做了这些事情。
奥巴马：我为美国奋斗不息罗姆尼称，希望能促进两党合作，提供真正的领导力，让人们走到一起，并创造就业。
他称已经这么做了，并将继续为美国人服务。
奥巴马则表示：我的方案是让中产阶级家庭减轻负担。
我推出的医保法案、结束阿富汗战争、对基地组织的打击，都是为了美国人民。
