I. Background HUMAN PERFORMANCE IN DEFAULT REASONING
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:141.42 KB
- 文档页数:14
Face tracking with automatic model constructionJesus Nuevo,Luis M.Bergasa ⁎,David F.Llorca,Manuel OcañaDepartment of Electronics,Universidad de Alcala.Esc.Politecnica,Crta Madrid-Barcelona,Km 33,600.28871Alcala de Henares,Madrid,Spaina b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o Article history:Received 12November 2009Received in revised form 26August 2010Accepted 15November 2010Available online xxxx Keywords:Face trackingAppearance modeling Incremental clustering Robust fittingDriver monitoringThis paper describes an active model with a robust texture model built on-line.The model uses one camera and it is able to operate without active illumination.The texture model is de fined by a series of clusters,which are built in a video sequence using previously encountered samples.This model is used to search for the corresponding element in the following frames.An on-line clustering method,named leaderP is described and evaluated on an application of face tracking.A 20-point shape model is used.This model is built of fline,and a robust fitting function is used to restrict the position of the points.Our proposal is to serve as one of the stages in a driver monitoring system.To test it,a new set of sequences of drivers recorded outdoors and in a realistic simulator has been compiled.Experimental results for typical outdoor driving scenarios,with frequent head movement,turns and occlusions are presented.Our approach is tested and compared with the Simultaneous Modeling and Tracking (SMAT)[1],and the recently presented Stacked Trimmed Active Shape Model (STASM)[2],and shows better results than SMAT and similar fitting error levels to STASM,with much faster execution times and improved robustness.©2010Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.Contents 1.Introduction ...............................................................02.Background ...............................................................03.Robust simultaneous modeling and tracking ................................................03.1.Appearance modeling .......................................................03.2.Shape model ...........................................................04.Tests and results .............................................................04.1.Test set ..............................................................04.2.Performance evaluation ......................................................04.3.Results ..............................................................04.3.1.R-SMAT with automatic initialization...........................................04.4.Timings..............................................................05.Conclusions and future work .......................................................0Acknowledgments...............................................................0References ..................................................................1.IntroductionDriver inattention is a major cause of traf fic accidents,and it has been found to be involved in some form in 80%of the crashes and 65%of the near crashes within 3s of the event [3].Monitoring a driver to detect inattention is a complex problem that involves physiological and behavioural elements.Different works have been presented in recentyears,focused mainly in drowsiness,with a broad range of techniques.Physiological measurements such as electro-encephalography (EEG)[4]or electro-oculography (EOG),provide the best data for detection [4].The problem with these techniques is that they are intrusive to the subject.Moreover,medical equipment is always expensive.Lateral position of the vehicle inside the lane,steering wheel movements and time-to-line crossing are commonly used,and some commercial systems have been developed [5,6].These techniques are not invasive,and to date they obtain the most reliable results.However,the measurements they use may not re flect behaviours such as the so-called micro-sleeps [7].They also require a trainingImage and Vision Computing 29(2011)209–218⁎Corresponding author.Tel.:+34918856569.E-mail addresses:jnuevo@depeca.uah.es (J.Nuevo),bergasa@depeca.uah.es(L.M.Bergasa),llorca@depeca.uah.es (D.F.Llorca),mocana@depeca.uah.es (M.Ocaña).0262-8856/$–see front matter ©2010Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2010.11.004Contents lists available at ScienceDirectImage and Vision Computingj o u r na l ho m e p a g e :w w w.e l s ev i e r.c o m /l o c a t e /i m av i speriod for each person,and thus are not applicable to the occasional driver.Drivers in fatigue exhibit changes in the way their eyes perform some actions,like moving or blinking.These actions are known as visual behaviours,and are readily observable in drowsy and distracted drivers.Face pose[8]and gaze direction also contain information and have been used as another element of inattention detection systems [9].Computer vision has been the tool of choice for many researchers to be used to monitor visual behaviours,as it is non-intrusive.Most systems use one or two cameras to track the head and eyes of the subject[10–14].A few companies commercialize systems[15,16]as accessories for installation in vehicles.These systems require user-specific calibration,and some of them use near-IR lighting,which is known to produce eye fatigue.Reliability of these systems is still not high enough for car companies to take on the responsibility of its production and possible liability in case of malfunctioning.Face location and tracking are thefirst processing stages of most computer vision systems for driver monitoring.Some of the most successful systems to date use near-IR active illumination[17–19],to simplify the detection of the eyes thanks to the bright pupil effect. Near-IR illumination is not as useful during the day because sunlight also has a near-IR component.As mentioned above,near-IR can produce eye fatigue and thus limits the amount of time these systems can be used on a person.Given the complexity of the problem,it has been divided in parts and in this work only the problem of face tracking is addressed.This paper presents a new active model with the texture model built incrementally.We use it to characterize and track the face in video sequences.The tracker can operate without active illumination. The texture model of the face is created online,and thus specific for each person without requiring a training phase.A new online clustering algorithm is described,and its performance compared with the method proposed in[1].Two shape models,trained online and off-line,are compared.This paper also presents a new video sequence database,recorded in a car moving outdoors and in a simulator.The database is used to assess the performance of the proposed face tracking method in the challenging environment a driver monitoring application would meet.No evaluations of face pose estimation and driver inattention detection are performed.The rest of the paper is structured as follows.Section2presents a few remarkable works in face tracking in the literature that are related to our proposal.Section3describes our approach.Section4describes the video dataset used for performance evaluation,and experimental results.This paper closes with conclusions and future work.2.BackgroundHuman face tracking is a broadfield in computing research[20], and a myriad of techniques have been developed in the last decades.It is of the greatest interest,as vast amounts of information are contained in face features,movements and gestures,which are constantly used for human communication.Systems that work on such data often use face tracking[21,22].Non-rigid object tracking has been a major focus of research in later years,and general purpose template-based trackers have been used to track faces in the literature with success.Several efficient approaches have been presented[23–26].Statistical models have been used for face modeling and tracking. Active Shape Models[27](ASM)are similar to the active contours (snakes),but include constraints from a Point Distribution Model (PDM)[28]computed in advance from a training set.Advances in late years have increased their robustness and precision to remarkable levels(STASM,[2]).Extensions of ASM that include modeling of texture have been presented,of which Active Appearance Models (AAMs)[29]are arguably the best known.Active Appearance Models are global models in the sense that the minimization is performed over all pixels that fall inside the mesh defined by the mean of the PDM.All these models have an offline training phase,which require comprehensive training sets so they can generalize properly to unseen instances of the object.This is time consuming process,and there is still the risk that perfectly valid instances of the object would not be modeled correctly.Several methods that work without a priori models have been presented in the literature.Most of them focus on patch tracking on a video sequence.The classic approach is to use the image patch extracted on thefirst frame of the sequence to search for similar patches on the following frames.Lukas–Kanade method[30]was one of thefirst proposed solutions and it is still widely used.Jepson et al.[31]presented a system with appearance model based on three components:a stable component that is learned over a long period based on wavelets,a2-frame tracker and an outlier rejection process.Yin and Collins[32]build an adaptive view-dependent appearance model on-line.The model is made of patches selected around Harris corners.Model and target patches are matched using correlation,and the change in position, rotation and scale is obtained with the Procrustes algorithm.Another successful line of work in object tracking without a priori training is based on classification instead of modeling.Collins and Liu [33]presented a system based on background/foreground discrimi-nation.Avidan[34]presents one of the many systems that use machine learning to classify patches[35,36].Avidan uses weak classifiers trained every frame and AdaBoost to combine them.Pilet et al.[37]train keypoint classifiers using Random Trees that are able to recognize hundreds of keypoints in real-time.Simultaneous Modeling and Tracking(SMAT)[1]is in line with methods like Lucas–Kanade,relaying on matching to track patches. Lukas–Kanade extracts a template at the beginning of the sequence and uses it for tracking,and will fail if the appearance of the patch changes considerably.Matthews et al.[38]proposed an strategic update of the template,which keeps the template from thefirst frame to correct errors that appear in the localization.When the error is too high,the update is blocked.In[39],a solution is proposed withfixed template that adaptively detected and selected the window around the features.SMAT builds a more complex model based on incremental clustering.In this paper we combine concepts from active models with the incremental clustering proposed in SMAT.The texture model is created online,making the model adaptative,while the shape model is learnt offline.The clustering used by SMAT has some limitations,and we propose some modifications to obtain a more robust model and better tracking.We name the approach Robust SMAT for this reason.Evaluation of face tracking methods is performed in most works with images captured indoors.Some authors use freely available image sets,but most of them test on internal datasets created by them,which limits the validity of a comparison with other systems.Only a few authors[40,41]have used images recorded in a vehicle,but the number of samples is limited.To the best of our knowledge,there is no publicly available video dataset of people driving,either in a simulator or in a real road.We propose a new dataset that covers such scenarios.3.Robust simultaneous modeling and trackingThis section describes the Simultaneous Modeling and Tracking (SMAT)of Dowson and Bowden[1],and some modifications we propose to improve its performance.SMAT tries to build a model of appearance of features and how their positions are related(the structure model,or shape),from samples of texture and shape obtained in previous frames.The models of appearance and shape are independent.Fitting is performed in the same fashion of ASM:the features arefirst found separately using correlation,and then theirfinal positions are constrained by the shape model.If thefinal positions are found to be reliable and not caused byfitting errors,the appearance model is updated,otherwise it is left unchanged.Fig.1shows aflow chart of the algorithm.210J.Nuevo et al./Image and Vision Computing29(2011)209–2183.1.Appearance modelingEach one of the possible appearances of an object,or a feature of it,can be considered as a point in a feature space.Similar appearances will be close in this space,away from other points representing dissimilar appearances of the object.These groups of points,or clusters,form a mixture model that can be used to de fine the appearance of the object.SMAT builds a library of exemplars obtained from previous frames,image patches in this case.Dowson and Bowden de fined a series of clusters by their median patch,also known as representative ,and their variance.A new incoming patch is made part of the cluster if the distance between it and the median of the cluster is below a threshold that is a function of the variance.The median and variance of a cluster are recalculated every time a patch is added to it.Up to M exemplars per cluster are kept.If the size limit is reached,the most distant element from the representative is removed.Every time a cluster is updated,the weight of the clusters is recalculated as in Eq.(1):w t +1ðÞk=w t ðÞk +α11+αifk =k u w t ðÞk11+αotherwise8>><>>:ð1Þwhere α∈[0,1)is the learning rate,and k u is the index of the updatedcluster.The number of clusters is also limited to K .If K is reached,the cluster with the lowest weight is discarded.In a later work,Dowson et al.[42],introduced a different condition for membership,that compares the probability of the exemplar belonging to foreground (a cluster)or to the background p fg j d x ;μn ðÞ;σfg n p bg j d x ;μn ðÞ;σbg nð2Þwhere σfg n is obtained from the distances between the representative and the other exemplars in the cluster,and σbg n is obtained from the distances between the representative and the exemplars in the cluster offset by 1pixel.We have found that this clustering method can be improved in several ways.The adapting nature of the clusters could theoretically lead two or more clusters to overlap.However,in our tests we have observed that the opposite is much more frequent:the representative of thecluster rarely changes after the cluster has reached a certain number of elements.Outliers can be introduced in the model in the event of an occlusion of the face by a hand or other elements like a scarf.In most cases,these exemplars would be far away from the representative in the cluster.To remove them and reduce memory footprint,SMAT keeps up to M exemplars per cluster.If the size limit is reached,the most distant element from the representative is removed.When very similar patches are constantly introduced,one of them will be finally chosen as the median,and the variance will decrease,over fitting the cluster and discarding valuable exemplars.At a frame rate of 30fps,with M set to 50,the cluster will over fit in less than 2s.This would happen even if the exemplar to be removed is chosen randomly.This procedure will discard valuable information and future,subtle changes to the feature will lead to the creation of another cluster.We propose an alternative clustering method,named leaderP ,to partially solve these and other problems.The method is a modi fication of the leader algorithm [43,44],arguably the simplest and most frequently used incremental clustering method.In leader ,each cluster C i is de fined by only one exemplar,and a fixed membership threshold T .It starts by making the first exemplar the representative of a cluster.If an incoming exemplar ful fills being within the threshold T it is marked as member of that cluster,otherwise it becomes a cluster on its own.The pseudocode is shown in Algorithm 1.Algorithm 1.Leader clustering.1:Let C ={C 1,…,C n }be a set of n clusters,withweights {w 1t ,…,w n t}2:procedure leader (E ,C )cluster patch E 3:for all C i ∈C do 4:if d (C k ,E )b T thenCheck if patch E ∈C k 5:UpdateWeights (w 1t ,…,w n t)As in Eq.(1)6:return 7:End If 8:End For 9:Create new cluster C n +1,with E asrepresentative.10:Set w n +1t +1←0Weight of new cluster C n +111:C ←C ∪C n +1Add new cluster to the model12:if n +1N K thenRemove the cluster with lowest weight13:Find C k |w k ≤w i i =1,…,n 14:C ←C ∖C k 15:end if16:end procedureFig.1.SMAT block diagram.211J.Nuevo et al./Image and Vision Computing 29(2011)209–218On the other hand,leaderP keeps the first few exemplars added to the cluster are kept,up to P .The median of the cluster is chosen as the representative,as in the original clustering of Dowson and Bowden.When the number of exemplars in the cluster reaches P ,all exemplars but the representative are discarded,and it starts to work under the leader algorithm.P is chosen as a small number (we use P =10).The membership threshold is however flexible:the distances between the representative and each of the exemplars that are found to be members of the cluster is saved,and the variance of those distances is used to calculate the threshold.Because the representative is fixed and distance is a scalar,many values can be kept in memory without having a impact on the overall performance.Keeping more values reduces the risk of over fitting.The original proposal of SMAT used Mutual Information (MI)as a distance measure to compare the image patches,and found it to perform better that Sum of Squared Differences (SSD),and slightly better than correlation in some tests.Any de finition of distance could be used.We have also tested Zero-mean Normalized Cross-Correlation (ZNCC).Several types of warping were tested in [42]:translation,Euclidean,similarity and af fine.The results showed an increasing failure rate as the degrees of freedom of the warps increased.Based on this,we have chosen to use the simplest,and the patches are only translated depending on the point distribution model.3.2.Shape modelIn the original SMAT of Dowson and Bowden,the shape was also learned on-line.The same clustering algorithm was used,but themembership of a new shape to a cluster was calculated using Mahalanobis distance.Our method relies on the pre-learned shape model.The restric-tions on using a pre-learned model for shape are less than those for an appearance model,as it is of lower dimensionality and the deforma-tions are easier to model.It has been shown [45]that location and tracking errors are mainly due to appearance,and that a generic shape model for faces is easier to construct.We use the method of classic ASM [27],which applies PCA to a set of samples created by hand and extracts the mean s 0and an orthogonal vector basis (s 1,…,s N ).The shapes are first normalized and aligned using Generalized Procrustes Analysis [46].Let s =(x 0,y 0,…,x n −1,y n −1)be a shape.A shape can be generated from this base as s =s 0+∑mi =1p i ·s i :ð3ÞUsing L 2norm,the coef ficients p =p 1;…;p N ðÞcan be obtained for a given shape s as a projection of s on the vector basis p =S Ts −s 0ðÞ;p i =s −s 0ðÞ·s i ð4Þwhere S is a matrix with the eigenvectors s i as rows.The estimation of p with Eq.(4)is very sensitive to the presence of outlier points:a high error value from one point will severely in fluence the values of p .We use M-estimators [47]to solve this problem.This technique hasbeenFig.2.Trayectory of the vehicle (map from ).Fig.3.Samples of outdoor videos.212J.Nuevo et al./Image and Vision Computing 29(2011)209–218applied to ASM and AAM in previous works [48,49],so it is only brie fly presented here.Let s be a shape,obtained by fitting each feature independently.The function to minimize is arg min p∑2ni =1ρr i;θð5Þwhere ρ:R ×R þ→R þis an M-estimator,and θis obtained from the standard deviation of the residues [50].r i is the residue for coordinate i of the shaper i=x i−s i o+∑mj =1p j s i j!!ð6Þwhere x i are the points of the shape s ,and s i j is the i th element of the vector s j .Minimizing function 5is a case of re-weighted least squared.The weight decreases more rapidly than the square of the residue,and thus a point with error tending to in finite will have zero weight in the estimation.Several robust estimators have been tested:Huber ,Cauchy ,Gaussian and Tukey functions [50].A study was made in [19]that resulted in similar performance for all of them in a similar scenario to that of this paper,and Huber function was chosen.Huber function performs correctly up to a number of outliers of 50%of the points.We use the 20-point distribution of the BioID database [51].Data from this database was used to train the model.This distribution places the points in some of the most salient locations of the face,and has been used in several other works [40].4.Tests and resultsThis section presents the video sequences used to test different tracking algorithms in a driving scenario.The dataset contains most actions that appear in everyday driving situations.A comparison between our approach and SMAT is presented.Additionally,we compare R-SMAT results with the recently introduced Stacked Trimmed ASM (STASM).4.1.Test setDriving scenarios present a series of challenges for a face tracking algorithm.Drivers move constantly,rotate their head (self-occluding part of the face)or occlude their face with their hands (or other elements such as glasses).If other people are in the car,talking and gesturing are common.There are also constant background changes and,more importantly,frequent illumination changes,produced by shadows of trees or buildings,streets lights,other vehicles,etc.A considerable amount of test data is needed to properly evaluate the performance of a system under all these situations.A new video dataset has been created,with sequences of subjects driving outdoor,and in a simulator.The RobeSafe Driver Monitoring Video (RS-DMV)dataset contains 10sequences,7recorded outdoors (Type A )and 3in a simulator (TypeB ).Outdoor sequences were recorded on RobeSafe's vehicle moving at the campus of the University of Alcala.Drivers were fully awake,talked frequently with other passengers in the vehicle and were asked to look regularly to the rear-view mirrors and operate the car sound system.The cameras are placed over the dashboard,to avoid occlusions caused by the wheel.All subjects drove the same streets,shown in Fig.2.The length of the track is around 1.1km.The weather conditions during the recordings were mostly sunny,which made noticeable shadows appear on the face.Fig.3shows a few samples from these video sequences.Type B sequences were recorded in a realistic truck simulator.Drivers were fully awake,and were presented with a demanding driving environment were many other vehicles were presentandFig.4.Samples of sequences in simulator.m e 17m e 17C u m u l a t i v e E r rD i s t r i b u t i o n00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91C u m u l a t i v e E r rD i s t r i b u t i o n(a)(b)Fig.5.Performance of different shape models,with leaderP clustering.213J.Nuevo et al./Image and Vision Computing 29(2011)209–218potentially dangerous situations took place.These situations increase the probability of small periods of distraction leading to crashes or near-crashes.The sequences try to capture both distracted behaviour and the reaction to dangerous driving situations.A few images from TypeB sequences can be seen in Fig.4.The recording took place in a low-light scenario that approached nighttime conditions.This forced the camera to increase exposure time to a maximum,which lead to motion blur being present during head movements.Low power near-IR illumination was used in some of the sequences to increase the available light.The outdoor sequences are around 2min long,and sequences in the simulator are close to 10min in length.The algorithms in this paper were tested on images of approximately 320×240pixels,but high resolution images were acquired so they can be used in other research projects.The images are 960×480pixels for the outdoor sequences and 1392×480for the simulator sequences,and are stored without compression.Frame rate is 30frames per second in both cases.The camera has a 2/3″sensor,and used 9mm standard lenses.Images are grayscale.The recording software controlled camera gain using values of the pixels that fell directly on the face of the driver.The RS-DMV is publicly available,free of charge,for research purposes.Samples and information on how to obtain the database are available at the authors'webpage.14.2.Performance evaluationPerformance of the algorithms is evaluated as the error between the estimated position of the features and their actual position,asgiven by a human operator.Hand-marking is a time consuming task,and thus not all frames in all videos have been marked.Approximately 1in 30frames (1per second)has been marked in the sequences in RS-DMV.We call this frames keyframes .We used the metric m e ,introduced by Cristinacce and Cootes [40].Let x i be the points of the ground-truth shape s ,and let ^xi be the points of the estimated shape ^s .Then,m e =1ns ∑n i =1d i ;d i=ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffix i −^x i T x i −^x ir ð7Þwhere n is the number of points and s is the inter-ocular distance.Wealso discard the point on the chin and the exterior of the eyes,because their location changes much from person to person.Moreover,the variance of their position when marked by human operators is greater than for the other points.Because only 17points are used,we note the metric as m e 17.In the event of a tracking loss,of if the face cannot be found,the value of m e 17for that frame is set to ∞.During head turns,the inter-eye distance reduces with the cosine of the angle.In these frames,s is not valid and is calculated from its value on previous frames.Handmarked points and software used to ease the marking process are distributed with the RS-DMV dataset.4.3.ResultsWe tested the performance of R-SMAT approach on the RS-DMV dataset,as well as that of SMAT.We compared these results with those obtained by STASM,using the implementation in [2].One of the most remarkable problems of (R-)SMAT is that it needs to be properly initialized,and the first frames of the sequence are key1/personal/jnuevo.Fig.7.Samples of type A sequence #1.Outlier points are drawn in red.m e 17FrameFig.6.m e 17error for a sequence.214J.Nuevo et al./Image and Vision Computing 29(2011)209–218to building a good model.We propose STASM to initialize (R-)SMAT in the first frame.STASM has been shown to be very accurate when the face is frontal.Nonetheless,a slightly incorrect initialization will make (R-)SMAT track the (slightly)erroneous points.To decouple this error from the evaluation of accuracy of (R-)SMAT in the tests,the shape was initialized in the first frame with positions from the ground-truth data.At the end of this section,the performance of R-SMAT with automatic initialization is evaluated.First,a comparison of the shape models is presented.With the best shape model,the original clustering algorithm and the proposed alternative are evaluated.Results are presented for outdoor and simulator sequences separately,as each has speci fic characteristics on their own.The incremental shape model of SMAT was found to produce much higher error than the pre-learned model.Fig.5shows the cumulative distribution error of the incremental shape model (on-line )with the robust pre-learned model (using Huber function)(robust ).Forcomparison purposes,the figure also shows the performance for the pre-learned shape model fitted using a L 2norm (non-robust ).All models use leaderP clustering,and patches of 15×15pixels.Clear improvements in performance are made by the change to a pre-learned model with robust fitting.The robust,pre-learned shape model is very important in the first frames,because it allows the model to have bigger certainties that the patches that are being included correspond to correct positions.Robust shape model is used in the rest of the experiments in this paper.Fig.6shows the plot of the m e 17distance of both models in a sequence.A clear example of the bene fits of the robust model is depicted in Fig.7.The online model diverges as soon as a few points are occluded by the hand,while the robust model keeps track of the face.The method is also able to keep track of the face during head rotations,although with increased fitting error.This is quite remarkable for a model that has only been trained with fully frontal faces.Fig.8shows the performance of the original SMAT clustering compared with the proposed leaderP clustering algorithm,as implemented in R-SMAT.R-SMAT presents much better performance than the original SMAT clustering.This is specially clear in Fig.8(b).We stated in Section 3.1that the original clustering method could lead to over fitting,and type B sequences are specially prone to this:patches are usually dark and do not change much from frame to frame,and the subject does not move frequently.When a movement takes place,it leads to high error values,because the model has problems finding the features.m e 17m e 17C u m u l a t i v e E r rD i s t r i b u t i o nC u m u l a t i v e E r rD i s t r i b u t i o n(a)(b)parison of the performance of clustering algorithms.Table 1Track losses for different clustering methods.MeanMaximum Minimum R-SMATType A 0.99% 2.08%(seq.#7)0%(seq.#1,#2,#6)Type B 0.71% 1.96%(seq.#9)0%(seq.#10)SMATType A 1.77% 5.03%(seq.#4)0%(seq.#1,#2,#5)TypeB1.03%2.45%(seq.#9)0%(seq.#10)m e 17m e 17C u m u l a t i v e E r rD i s t r i b u t i o n00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91C u m u l a t i v e E r r D i s t r i b u t i o n(a)(b)parison of the performance of STASM and SMAT.215J.Nuevo et al./Image and Vision Computing 29(2011)209–218。
全文分为作者个人简介和正文两个部分:作者个人简介:Hello everyone, I am an author dedicated to creating and sharing high-quality document templates. In this era of information overload, accurate and efficient communication has become especially important. I firmly believe that good communication can build bridges between people, playing an indispensable role in academia, career, and daily life. Therefore, I decided to invest my knowledge and skills into creating valuable documents to help people find inspiration and direction when needed.正文:安静一下不被打扰英语作文英语作文分论点全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1The Necessity of Quiet, Uninterrupted TimeWe live in a world of constant noise, distractions, and interruptions. From the moment we wake up to the second we fall asleep, we are bombarded with stimuli from all directions –notifications dinging on our phones, endless email chains, background music or TV noise, and the general hustle and bustle of modern life. In this overwhelming sea of inputs, it can be incredibly challenging to find moments of true peace and quiet to simply exist, breathe, and think.As a student, I have come to deeply value and prioritize having blocks of uninterrupted time to myself. This quiet solitude is essential for my ability to focus, reflect, recharge, and ultimately perform at my highest level academically and creatively. In this essay, I will explore three key reasons why dedicated quiet time is so vital: its impact on learning and productivity, its benefits for mental health and wellbeing, and its role in nurturing creativity and original thinking.First and foremost, having stretches of silent, distraction-free time is critical for optimizing learning and academic performance. When we are constantly being pinged and pulled in different directions by notifications, background noise, and fragmented inputs, it becomes extremely difficult to gain depth of understanding or achieve any meaningful flow state in our work. Multitasking and chronic interruptions have been shown again and again in studies to severely impair cognitive function, memory formation, and overall productivity.In contrast, working or studying in a quiet, contained environment allows our brains to fully concentrate and go into a state of deep focus. We can explore concepts and information with intense attention, make connections between ideas, and solidify our understanding through periods of absorbed concentration. Some of my most productive times as a student have occurred during quiet Saturday mornings at the library or late nights at home when the world is asleep and silent. These respites of tranquility are precious opportunities for me to delve wholeheartedly into my schoolwork without interference.Additionally, quiet solitude plays an essential role in memory consolidation and retention of the material we are attempting to learn. The human brain requires periods of reflection, where new information can be processed, connected to existing knowledge, and committed to long-term memory storage. This crucial transition from working memory to stable, lasting memories is impaired when we are constantly context-switching between tasks and dealing with incessant interruptions. Finding quiet moments to mindfully review, reinforce, and make sense of what I've learned in class has been a critical study technique that has served me well.Beyond academics, having pockets of quiet time is profoundly beneficial for mental health and overall wellbeing. In our frenetic, over-stimulated modern world, many people report feelings of constant exhaustion, anxiety, and an inability to simply be present and at peace. Taking intentional breaks from the commotion and chaos of daily life is incredibly restorative. During my own periods of solitary quiet, I am able to breathe deeply, release the tensions of the day, and re-center myself both emotionally and spiritually.These reprieves act as a reset button, allowing my overstimulated mind to finally find stillness and anchor itself in the present moment rather than being caught up in the swirling winds of fragmented thoughts and inputs. Quiet introspection has helped me become more self-aware, gain perspective on stressors or challenges I may be facing, and cultivate an inner calm and equanimity that is invaluable for overall mentalwell-being.Finally, quiet, uninterrupted solitude is absolutely vital for nurturing creativity, allowing our minds to wander, and having original thoughts and breakthroughs. Some of humanity's greatest ideas, discoveries, and works of art were born during periods of blessed tranquility, when the outside world fell awayand the depths of the inner world were given space to emerge. From Watson and Crick's Nobel Prize-winning insights into the structure of DNA to Wordsworth's revelations about the restorative powers of nature, moments of creative genesis so often arise in silence and stillness.For me personally, many of my most innovative ideas and imaginative bursts happen when I am able to simply be, without distractions – on a long walk while lost in my own thoughts, lying in bed before falling asleep, or during a rare quiet hour with a book or journal. The loud, frenetic nature of our current era can be incredibly stifling for original thinking. Consistent access to quiet offers a way to break free from the incessant noise, access different modes of cognition, and tap into the unstructured daydreaming and mind-wandering so crucial for novel ideas to take shape.In essence, quiet solitude is oxygen for the mind. It clears the mental clutter, stills the cacophony, and provides a canvas for learning, introspection, and creativity to flourish unimpeded. The human brain was not engineered to operate optimally in an environment of constant partial attention and stimuli overload. We require intervals of true peace and focus to function at the highest levels.As both a student and a human being living in this increasingly frenetic world, I have come to deeply value and consciously prioritize having pockets of quiet solitude each day. These windows of tranquility are sacred spaces for me to learn, recharge, reflect, and create in a way that is simply not possible when bombarded by nonstop noise and interruptions. They are not luxuries or expendable indulgences, but basic necessities for my academic success, emotional equilibrium, and ability to do my best work.In this age of endless inputs and scattered attention, the understated power of quiet cannot be overstated. Amidst all the commotion and motion, may we all find pockets of restorative silence and learn to grant ourselves the gift of uninterrupted presence, even if just for a few blessed moments each day.篇2Let Me Have Some Peace and Quiet, PleaseAs a student, my life is a constant juggling act. Between classes, homework, extracurriculars, and trying to maintain some semblance of a social life, it feels like there's always something demanding my attention. Don't get me wrong, I'm grateful for the opportunities I have, but sometimes it all becomes a bitoverwhelming. That's why I firmly believe that having moments of peace and quiet, free from distractions and interruptions, is crucial for my well-being and academic success. In this essay, I'll outline three key reasons why we all need to occasionally hit the pause button and embrace the sweet sound of silence.I. Preventing Burnout and Promoting Mental HealthThe first and arguably most important reason for having some uninterrupted quiet time is to safeguard our mental health. The constant barrage of stimuli we face daily – from the pings of our phones to the cacophony of city life – can take a serious toll on our psyches. Without respite, it's all too easy to become overwhelmed, leading to increased stress, anxiety, and even burnout.As students, we're expected to juggle a multitude of responsibilities, from attending classes and completing assignments to participating in extracurriculars and, for some, holding down part-time jobs. It's a lot to handle, and if we don't intentionally carve out moments to decompress and recharge, the weight of it all can quickly become too much to bear.During these quiet interludes, our minds have a chance to rest and reset, allowing us to process our thoughts and emotions more effectively. This, in turn, can help us better manage stress,improve our focus and concentration, and even boost our overall mood and sense of well-being.II. Fostering Creativity and ProductivityWhile it may seem counterintuitive, having periods of silence and solitude can actually enhance our creativity and productivity. In our constantly connected, fast-paced world, it's easy to get caught up in the frenzy and lose sight of the bigger picture. By consciously unplugging and creating space for stillness, we give our minds the freedom to wander, make new connections, and come up with innovative ideas.Think about some of history's greatest thinkers, writers, and artists – many of them actively sought out quiet retreats to fuel their creative processes. From Henry David Thoreau's sojourn at Walden Pond to J.K. Rowling's writing sessions in cafés, these individuals understood the value of escaping the noise and distractions of everyday life.For students, this quiet time can be instrumental in helping us tackle challenging assignments, brainstorm ideas for projects, or simply gain a fresh perspective on the material we're studying. When we're not constantly bombarded by external stimuli, our minds are free to roam, explore, and make unexpected connections that might otherwise go unnoticed.III. Strengthening Focus and ConcentrationIn today's age of constant digital distractions, maintaining focus and concentration has become an increasingly daunting challenge. From the allure of social media notifications to the temptation of multitasking, it's all too easy to find ourselves fragmented and struggling to stay on task.However, by deliberately creating pockets of uninterrupted quiet time, we can train our brains to better resist these distractions and maintain a deeper level of concentration. Just as muscles grow stronger through regular exercise, our ability to focus improves with practice – and what better practice than immersing ourselves in complete silence?During these quiet moments, without the constant barrage of external stimuli vying for our attention, we can fully immerse ourselves in the task at hand, whether it's studying for an exam, working on a research paper, or simply reading a good book. This heightened focus not only enhances our productivity and comprehension but can also lead to a greater sense of satisfaction and accomplishment.In ConclusionIn a world that often seems determined to bombard us with noise and distractions at every turn, the ability to carve out moments of peace and quiet is not just a luxury – it's a necessity. By intentionally embracing silence and solitude, we safeguard our mental health, foster creativity and productivity, and strengthen our focus and concentration.As students, our academic and personal success hinges on our ability to effectively manage the countless demands on our time and attention. By prioritizing quiet time, we give ourselves the space to recharge, reflect, and approach our responsibilities with renewed vigor and clarity.So, the next time you find yourself feeling overwhelmed or struggling to concentrate, resist the urge to power through the chaos. Instead, give yourself permission to step away from the noise, even if just for a few precious moments. Embrace the stillness, listen to the sound of your own thoughts, and let the restorative power of silence work its magic. Your mind, body, and academic pursuits will thank you for it.篇3Please Be Quiet and Don't DisturbHave you ever been in the middle of something really important and focused, only to be rudely interrupted by loud noises or disruptive people around you? It's one of the most frustrating experiences, isn't it? Whether you're trying to study for a big test, working on a major project, or just trying to relax and enjoy some peaceful downtime, being disturbed can completely throw you off and ruin your flow. That's why I'm arguing today that we all need to be more conscious about keeping quiet and not disturbing others.My main points are: 1) Noise and distractions make it extremely difficult to concentrate and be productive. 2) Constant interruptions and loud environments are major sources of stress.3) Having quiet zones and respecting others' need for silence improves everyone's mental wellbeing. Let me expand on each of these points.Concentration and ProductivityWhen you're deep in thought, researching a topic, or working through a difficult problem, the human brain needs focused, uninterrupted time to process information effectively. Even small noises or micro-distractions can completely derail your train of thought and force you to restart from the beginning. It's incredibly inefficient and frustrating. I know from experiencethat whenever I'm disturbed while studying, it takes me at least 5-10 minutes to get back into the same focused mindset I was in before. Over the course of a few hours, those little disruptions really start to add up in wasted time and mental energy.The effects on productivity are even more pronounced for complex, creative work. When you're trying to write an essay, analyze literature, or code a program, you need long stretches of quiet concentration to develop your ideas, make connections, and produce quality output. Distractions and noise literally block the brain's ability to engage in higher-order thinking and creative flow. I've had so many promising ideas and paragraphs get derailed because of an ill-timed loud conversation or notification sound going off nearby. It's so immensely demotivating.Simple fact: humans are not multi-tasking machines. We have limited attentional resources that become quickly overwhelmed and maxed out in noisy environments. Quiet allows us to hyper-focus our cognitive energy on the task at hand. But constant interruptions and cacophony cause attention to be divided, making work suffer immensely. For anything requiring real mental effort, silence is absolutely essential for peak performance.Stress and Mental HealthBeyond just impacting our productivity though, distracting noises and interruptions are also major sources of ambient stress. Even if we try to block them out or ignore them, our brains still automatically process sudden sounds and movements happening around us. This activates the fight-or-flight stress response and causes cortisol and adrenaline to spike, increasing feelings of anxiety and annoyance.Living or working in a continually loud, chaotic environment keeps the body's stress levels elevated all the time, never getting a break. This constant biochemical stress has immensely harmful effects over time, from impairing memory and concentration, to disrupting sleep, suppressing immune function, increasing inflammation, and even contributing to more serious conditions like depression, heart disease, and high blood pressure. The brain and body simply cannot stay in peak condition when they never get peace and quiet to recharge their batteries.I know I personally get so much more tense, snappy, and drained whenever I have to deal with noisy distractions for extended periods while I'm trying to get work done. The stress and mental fatigue build up quickly, leaving me completely depleted by the end of the day. In contrast, when I'm able towork or relax in a quiet, peaceful setting, I feel so much calmer, happier, and more mentally resilient and capable of handling challenges. Silence truly is a major key to psychological wellbeing.Community and RespectThe final point is that maintaining quiet spaces and giving others peace from disturbances isn't just a personal preference — it's a community responsibility that we all need to respect. We're living in increasingly dense, crowded spaces, whether in cities, dorms, apartment complexes, or shared offices. Our individual choices regarding noise and disruptions now impact those around us more than ever before.In such close quarters, even if we're willing to put up with noise and chaos ourselves, we need to be considerate that others may have very different needs and sensitivities. Maybe they're night owls trying to sleep during the day. Maybe they have ADHD, autism, or other conditions that make them struggle more with noise and overstimulation. Maybe they just value quiet, peaceful environments to take care of their mental health. No matter the reason, we should respect that and not impose our preferences on others.That's why I think it's so important for communities, residences, libraries, cafes, transit systems, and workplaces to provide clear quiet zones and rules around noise to accommodate a range of needs. Open office plans with no privacy, blasting music in shared spaces, and loudly talking on speaker phones in public areas are incredibly inconsiderate and disruptive. Sure, maybe some people are fine tuning it out, but likely many others are silently suffering and having their wellbeing, health, and productivity undermined on a daily basis.We should be proactively creating more pockets of silence and calm, while also being respectful about keeping voices down, wearing headphones, and being aware of our volume and movements when around others who may not want to be disturbed. A little consideration and environmental awareness from each of us can go a long way in reducing stress and frustration for everyone.In ClosingIn our increasingly fast-paced, hectic modern world, being able to find precious moments of quiet concentration and mental stillness is so important, yet decreasingly available. I really believe we need to reprioritize silence and freedom from disruptions as a societal value. It's not about being rude orantisocial — it's about respecting our fundamental human needs for focused thought, reduced stress, and mental rejuvenation.The negative impacts of persistent noise and interruptions on our productivity, health, and overall wellbeing are just too high and detrimental to keep overlooking. We simply cannot perform our best cognitively or be our healthiest selves without sufficient periods of peace and quiet built into our daily lives and environments.So I urge everyone, let's all be a bit more conscious about keeping the volume down, avoiding unnecessary disturbances, respecting others' boundaries around quiet time, and proactively creating more silent spaces in our communities. Our minds will be sharper, our stress reduced, and our general quality of life enhanced immensely if we can just be a little more quiet. Please be quiet and don't disturb — our collective mental wellbeing may depend on it.。
为人力部门写求职信英文Dear Hiring Manager,I am writing to express my interest in the open position within your Human Resources department. With a strong background in human resources and a passion for effective people management, I am confident in my ability to contribute positively to your team.I have over five years of experience working in various HR roles, including recruitment, employee relations, and training and development. Throughout my career, I have developed a keen understanding of HR best practices and have successfully implemented strategies to improve employee engagement and retention.One of my key strengths is my ability to effectively communicate and build relationships with employees at all levels of an organization. I believe that strong communication is essential for creating a positive work environment and fostering a culture of collaboration and teamwork. I have experience conducting employee surveys, facilitating team-building activities, and providing coaching and mentorship to help employees reach their full potential.In addition to my hands-on experience in HR, I hold a Bachelor's degree in Human Resource Management from a reputable university. I have also completed various professional development courses, including training in conflict resolution, performance management, and diversity and inclusion.I am particularly drawn to your company's commitment to promoting a diverse and inclusive workplace. I believe that fostering a culture of diversity not only enriches the work environment but also leads to better business outcomes. I am dedicated to promoting diversity and inclusion initiatives and have experience developing and implementing programs to support underrepresented groups within an organization.I am excited about the opportunity to bring my skills and expertise to your Human Resources department. I am confident that my background and experience make me a strong candidate for this position, and I am eager to contribute to the continued success of your organization. I look forward to the possibility of discussing my application with you further.Thank you for considering my application. I hope to hear from you soon.Sincerely,[Your Name]。
Unite 3 Doctor’s Dilemma: Treat or Let Die?Abigail Trafford1. Medical advances in wonder drugs, daring surgical procedures, radiation therapies, and intensive-care units have brought new life to thousands of people. Yet to many of them, modern medicine has become a double-edged sword.2. Doctor’s power to treat with an array of space-age techniques has outstripped the body’s capacity to heal. More medical problems can be treated, but for many patients, there is little hope of recovery. Even the fundamental distinction between life and death has been blurred.3. Many Americans are caught in medical limbo, as was the South Korean boxer Duk Koo Kim, who was kept alive by artificial means after he had been knocked unconscious in a fight and his brain ceased to function. With the permission of his family, doctors in Las Vegas disconnected the life-support machines and death quickly followed.4. In the wake of technology’s advances in medicine, a heated debate is taking place in hospitals and nursing homes across the country --- over whether survival or quality of life is the paramount goal of medicine.5. “It gets down to what medicine is all about, ” says Daniel Callahan, director of the Institute of Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York. “Is it really to save a life? Or is the larger goal the welfare of the patient?”6. Doctors, patients, relatives, and often the courts are being forced to make hard choices in medicine. Most often it is at the two extremes of life that these difficultyethical questions arise --- at the beginning for the very sick newborn and at the end for the dying patient.7. The dilemma posed by modern medical technology has created the growing new discipline or bioethics. Many of the country’s 127 medical s chools now offer courses in medical ethics, a field virtually ignored only a decade ago. Many hospitals have chaplains, philosophers, psychiatrists, and social workers on the staff to help patients make crucial decisions, and one in twenty institutions has a special ethics committee to resolve difficult cases.Death and Dying8. Of all the patients in intensive-care units who are at risk of dying, some 20 percent present difficult ethical choices --- whether to keep trying to save the life or to pull back and let the patient die. In many units, decisions regarding life-sustaining care are made about three times a week.9. Even the definition of death has been changed. Now that the heart-lung machine can take over the functions of breathing and pumping blood, death no longer always comes with the patient’s “last gasp” or when the heart stops beating. Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia have passed brain-death statutes that identify death as when the whole brain ceases to function.10. More than a do zen states recognize “living wills” in which the patients leave instructions to doctors not to prolong life by feeding them intravenously or by other methods if their illness becomes hopeless. A survey of California doctors showed that 20 to 30 percent were following instructions of such wills. Meanwhile, the hospicemovement, which its emphasis on providing comfort --- not cure --- to the dying patient, has gained momentum in many areas.11. Despite progress in society’s understanding of death and dying, t heory issues remain. Example: A woman, 87, afflicted by the nervous-system disorder of Parkinson’s disease, has a massive stroke and is found unconscious by her family. Their choices are to put her in a nursing home until she dies or to send her to a medical center for diagnosis and possible treatment. The family opts for a teaching hospital in New York city. Tests show the woman’s stroke resulted from a blood clot that is curable with surgery. After the operation, she says to her family: “Why did you bring me back to this agony?” Her health continues to worsen, and two years later she dies.12. On the other hand, doctors say prognosis is often uncertain and that patients, just because they are old and disabled, should not be denied life-saving therapy. Ethicists also fear that under the guise of medical decision not to treat certain patients, death may become too easy, pushing the country toward the acceptance of euthanasia.13. For some people, the agony of watching high-technology dying is too great. Earlier this year, Woodrow Wilson Collums, a retired dairyman from Poteet, Texas, was put on probation for the mercy killing of his older brother Jim, who lay hopeless in his bed at a nursing home, a victim of severe senility resul ting from Alzheimer’s disease. After the killing, the victim’s widow said: “I think God, Jim’s out of his misery. I hate to think it had to be done the way it was done, but I understand it. ”Crisis in Newborn Care14. At the other end of the life span, technology has so revolutionized newborn carethat it is no longer clear when human life is viable outside the womb. Newborn care has got huge progress, so it is absolutely clear that human being can survive independently outside the womb. Twenty-five years ago, infants weighting less than three and one-half pounds rarely survived. The current survival rate is 70 percent, and doctors are “salvaging” some babies that weigh only one and one-half pounds. Tremendous progress has been made in treating birth deformities such as spina bifida. Just ten years ago, only 5 percent of infants with transposition of the great arteries --- the congenital heart defect most commonly found in newborns --- survived. Today, 50 percent live.15. Yet, for many infants who owe their lives to new medical advances, survival has come at a price. A significant number emerge with permanent physical and mental handicaps.16. “The question of treatment and nontreatment of seriously ill newborns is not a single one,”says Thomas Murray of the Hastings Center. “But I feel strongly that retardation or the fact that someone is going to be less than perfect is not good grounds for allowing an infant to die.”17. For many parents, however, the experience of having a sick newborn becomes a lingering nightmare. Two years ago, an Atlanta mother gave birth to a baby suffering from Down’s Syndrome, a form of mental retardation; the child also had blocked intestines. The doctors rejected the parents’ plea not to operate, and today the child, severely retarded, still suffers intestinal problems.18. “Every time Melanie has a bowel movement, she cries,” explains her mother.“She’s not able to take care of herself, and we won’t live forever. I wanted to save her from sorrow, pain, and suffering. I don’t understand the emphasis on life at all costs, and I’m very angry at the doctors and the hospital. Who will take care of Melanie after we’re gone? Where will you doctors be then?”Changing Standards19. The choices posed by modern technology have profoundly changed the practice of medicine. Until now, most doctors have been activists, trained to use all the tools in their medical arsenals to treat disease. The current trend is toward nontreatment as doctors grapple with questions not just of who should get care but when to take therapy away.20. Always in the background is the threat of legal action. In August, two California doctors were charged with murdering a comatose patient by allegedly disconnecting the respirator and cutting off food and water. In 1981, a Massachusetts nurse was charged with murdering a cancer patient with massive doses of morphine but was subsequently acquitted.21. Between lawsuits, government regulations, and patients’ rights, many doctors feel they are under siege. Modern technology actually has limited their ability to make choices. More recently, these actions are resolved by committees.Public Policy22. In recent years, the debate on medical ethics has moved to the level of national policy. “It’s just beginning to hit us that we don’t have unlimited resources,” says Washington Hospital Center’s Dr. Lynch. “You can’t talk about ethics without talkingethics without talking about money.”23. Since 1972. Americans have enjoyed unlimited access to a taxpayer-supported, kidney dialysis program that offers life-prolonging therapy to all patients with kidney failure. To a number of police analysts, the program has grown out of control --- to a $1.4billion operation supporting 61,000 patients. The majority are over 50, and about a quarter have other illness, such as cancer or heart disease, conditions that could exclude them from dialysis in other countries.24. Some hospitals are pulling back from certain lifesaving treatment. Massachusetts General Hospital, for example, has decided not perform heart transplants on the ground that the high costs of providing such surgery help too few patients. Burn units --- through extremely effective --- also provide very expensive therapy for very few patients.25. As medical scientists push back the frontiers of therapy, the moral dilemma will continue to grow for doctors and patients alike, making the choice of to treat the basic question in modern medicine.1. 在特效药、风险性手术进程、放疗法以及特护病房方面的医学进展已为数千人带来新生。
Key to Exercises of CollegeEnglish Book 2Unit 1★Text AVocabularyI.1.1) insert 2) on occasion 3) investigate 4) In retrospect5) initial 6)phenomena7) attached 8) make up for9) is awaiting 10) not…in the least11) promote12) emerged2. 1) There is a striking contrast between the standards of living in the north ofthe country and the south.2) Natural fiber is said to be superior to synthetic fiber.3) The city’s importance as a financial center has evolved slowly.4) His nationality is not relevant to whether he is a good lawyer.5) The poems by a little-known sixteenth-century Italian poet have found theirway into some English magazines.3. 1) be picked up, can’t accomplish, am exaggerating2) somewhat, performance, have neglected, they apply to3) assist, On the other hand, are valid, a superiorII.1.1) continual 2) continuous 3) continual 4) continuous2.1) principal 2) principal 3) principle 4) principles 5) principalIII.1. themselves2. himself/herself3. herself/by herself/on her own4. itself5. ourselves6. yourself/ by yourself/on your ownComprehensive ExerciseI. Cloze1. 1) contrast 2) exaggerating 3) priority 4) on the other hand 5) promoting6) pick up 7) assist 8) accomplish 9) on occasion 10) neglecting11) worthwhile 12) superior2. 1) end 2) perform 3) facing 4) competent 5) equipped 6) designed 7) approach 8) rest 9) definitely 10) qualityII. Translation1.1) It takes an enormous amount of courage to make a departure from the tradition.2) Tom used to be very shy,but this time he was bold enough to give a performancein front of a large audience.3) Many educators think it desirable to foster the creative spirit in the childat an early age.4) Assuming (that) this painting really is a masterpiece, do you think it’sworthwhile to buy/purchase it?5) If the data is statistically valid, it will throw light on the problem weare investigating.2. To improve our English, it is critical todo more reading, writing, listeningand speaking. Besides, learning by heart as many well-written essays as possible is also very important. Without an enormous store of good English writing in your head you cannot express yourself freely in English. It is also helpful to summarize our experience as we go along, for in so doing, we can figure out which way of learning is more effective and will produce the most desirable result.As long as we keep working hard on it, we will in due course accomplish the task of mastering English.★ Text BComprehension check: c c d a c bLanguage Practice1.g h e c f a b d2.1) adopt 2) account 3) from your point of view 4) ended up5) furthermore 6)fund 7) annual 8) keeping track of 9) pace 10) intends11) perspective 12) deviseUnit 2★Text AVocabularyI. 1. 1) abrupt 2) emotional 3) bless 4) wear and tear 5) dated6)consequences 7)seemingly 8) in contrast to 9) Curiosity 10) genuine 11) primarily 12) sentiments2. 1) When you are confronted with more than one problem, try to solvethe easiest one first.2) Water is vital to the existence of all forms of life.3) There is still some confusion among the students about what to doafter class to follow up on the subject.4) As a person of simple living habits, he needs nothing more thana job and an apartment to be happy.5) It tickled him to think that she’d come to as his advice.3. 1) a lingering, fabricating, sentiments2) fill out, every item, vital, consequences3) be denied, tangible, cherish, attainII.1.It’s a long trip and will take us five hours by bus.2.She arrived early and took a front row seat.3.Don’t take me for a fool.4.It takes a lot of imagination to fabricate such a story.5.My uncle will take me (along on his trip) to the Arctic this summer.6.He took the dinner plate I passed to him.7.Kevin took second prize in the weight-lifting competition.8.If you don’t take my advice, you will regret it.III.1.hanging2. to give3. to return4. being praised5. not havingwritten6. to say7. to open8. being helpedComprehensive ExerciseI.1. 1) well-off/affluent 2) dated 3) falling into 4) bracket 5) deny6) tangible 7) pursuit 8) cherishes 9) out of place 10) abrupt11) focus 12) donations2. 1) consume 2) fueled 3) annual 4) plain 5) physically 6) security7) indicates 8) equally 9) traditional 10) followsII. Translation1.1) The company denied that its donations had a commercial purpose.2) Whenever he was angry, he would begin to stammer slightly.3) Education is the most cherished tradition in our family.That’s why myparents never took me to dinner at expensive restaurants, but sent me to the best private school.4) Shortly after he recovered from the surgery, he lost his job and thus hadto go through another difficult phase of his life.5) In contrast to our affluent neighbors, my parents are rather poor, but theyhave always tried hard to meet our minimal needs.2. With more and more donations coming in, our university will be much betteroff financially next year. We will thus be able to focus on the most important task that we, educators, must take on: to encourage students to attain their scholarly/academic goals, to train them to be dependable and responsible individuals, to prepare them for the life ahead, and to guide them in their pursuit of spiritual as well as material satisfaction.★ Text BComprehension Check: b b d c d dLanguage Practice1.fcgebahd2.1) stunned 2) hold (fast) to 3) folks 4) generosity 5) discount6) liable7) ranks 8) on the run 9) make up 10) blends in 11) by all accounts 12) comesinto contact withUnit 3★Text AVocabularyI.1.1) typical 2)dumb 3) junior 4) glorious 5) welfare 6)came over 7) interference 8)fading 9) narrowed down 10) frank 11)schemes 12) at any rate2. 1) The Security council consists of five generals and four police officers.2) The new hotel will be in a location overlooking the lake.3) I was humiliated by her comments about my family background in front of somany people.4) Do you have any proof that it was Henry who stole the computer?5) the boy was exhausted after the long cycle ride.3. 1) hysterical。
保研面试英语自我介绍5篇范文模板:保研是被保送者不经过笔试等初试一些程序,通过一个考评形式鉴定学生的学习成绩、综合素质等,在一个允许的.范围内,直接由学校保送读研究生。
下面给大家分享保研面试英语自我介绍内容,希望能够帮助大家!保研面试英语自我介绍1Good morning,my name is karies.Its a great honur to have the opportunity for this interview. I would like to answer whatever you may raise,and I hope I could make a good performance today.Now I will introduce myself briefly.Im 21 years old,and I have been living wuhan for nearly 21 years.In the past years ,I spent most of my time on study.Iv passed CET 4 6 with a ease.And I have my acedemic records kept distinguished among the whole department.Now all my hard work has got a result,since I have the chance to be interviewed here.I cant describe my character well,but I know Im optimistic and confident. I like to stay alone,reading or listening music.though Im alone ,but Im not lonely.I have many friends here.After the summer intership in shengzhen,I hope to form a systermatic view of IE and to build a solid foundation for future profession after two years study.Doctor Jocob Chen once said Aim high ,vertical launch ,fly fast,complete your mission with style. Now given the chance,I will try my best to make it.Good afternoon (morning), professors:It is my great pleasure to be here. My name is mingmingzhou , graduated fromComputer Science Department of Wuhan niversity.During my four-year study in the university as an under-graduate student, I have built up a solid foundation of professional knowledge, as well as a rich experience of social activities. I am a determined person, always willing to achieve higher goals.Whats more, I am good at analysis, with a strong sense of cooperation. All of these led me to the success of passing the first round of the entrance examination to the Masters degree. Personally, I am very humorous and easy-going, enjoying a goodrelationship among my classmates. In my spare time, I like to read books regarding how to be myself and how to deal with problems. Music and movies are my favorite entertainments. As for my sportinterest, I could not deny my greatest interest is football. Playing this game brings me a lot of glory, happiness and passion.All in all, Wuhan University, with a highly qualified facultyand strong academic environment is the university I have long admired. I believe that I am a very qualified applicant for admission into your Master of IT program and can contribute to the enrichment or diversity of your university.保研面试英语自我介绍2Good afternoon,professors:It is my great honor to introduce myself here .My name is liuxiaobing . I come from maoyi sheng class ,the college of civil engineering .And my major is track engineering .During my three-year study in the university ,I have built up a solid foundation of professional knowledge ,as well as a rich experience of social activities .I attained a practice in an internet company on summer vacation of freshman year .This practice not only brought the first bucket of gold to me ,but also let me learn how to cooperate with a wide range of people . When Iwas a sophomore ,I took part in the national undergraduate innovation program as a group leaderandImade impressive progress .There is no doubt that joining this program is so rewarding to me .I learned that a considerate plan could make everything less work and it is of much significance to do what you like andthen insist it. what’s more ,Ialso acquired lots ofprofessional knowledge and knew how to think independently .I am an ambitious person ,always willing to achieve higher goals .I am very interested in my major course ,and I’d like to study it more systematically .This is why I hope to join this class .If I have the chance to be a member of the team ,I’ll try to improve my ability on innovation and learn more skills about professional softwares . I’ll try my best to be an expert in rail transit. Thank you .The content of our program is test study on DX piles performance in frozen soils under lateral loads .We did a series of experiments about DX piles and finally proved DX piles performance is better than straight piles .保研面试英语自我介绍3Hello, my name is ______, it is really a great honor to have this opportunity for a interview, i would like to answer whatever you may raise, and i hope i can make a good performance today, eventually eoll in this prestigious university in september. now i will introduce myself briefly,i am ____years old,born in ______8 province ,northeast of china,and i am curruently a senior student at ________.my major ispackaging engineering.and i will receive my bachelor degree after my graduation in june.in the past __years,i spend most of my time on study,i have passed ________with a ease. and i have acquired basic knowledge of packaging and publishing both in theory and in practice. besides, i have attend several packaging exhibition hold in Beijing, this is our advantage study here, i have taken a tour to some big factory and company. through these i have a deeplyunderstanding of domestic packaging industry. compared to developed countries such as us, unfortunately, although we have made extraordinary progress since 1978,our packaging industry are still underdeveloped, mess, unstable, the situation of employees in this field are awkard. but i have full confidence in a bright future if only our economy can keep the growth pace still. i guess you maybe interested in the reason itch to law, and what is my plan during graduate study life, i would like to tell you that pursue law is one of my lifelong goal,i like my major packaging and i wont give up,if i can pursue my master degree here i will combine law with my former education. i will work hard inthesefields ,patent ,trademark, copyright, on the base of my years study in department of pp, my character? i cannotdescribe it well, but i know i am optimistic and confident. sometimes i prefer to stay alone, reading, listening to music, but i am not lonely, i like to chat with my classmates, almost talk everything ,my favorite pastime is valleyball,playing cards or surf online. through college life,i learn how to balance between study and entertainment. by the way, i was a actor of our amazing drama club. . Thank you保研面试英语自我介绍4Hello!Everyone.I am so happy to stand here to introduce myself.And my name is __x,Im from __x,this is a beautiful place ,you know .And I have graduated from Binhai Middle School in JIANG su this year,in the shcool,I had a lot of friends.We palyed together,studied together and we had the same favourite,so I enjoyed it.My hobbies are various,such as YO-YO,Four-wheel-drive and so on.Of course,I am export at these most.And I also have many other hobbies you dont know,I wish you could find my hobbies in the summer camp.And also I can find your hobbies,maybe wehave the same hobbies.Do you think it will be exciting.Yes,yes,I believe ,I believe we will have a good tme,and we will leave a deep,a beautiful,an unforgettable impression!So everything is waiting for you and me to createtogether. Iam so happy to enjoy with you in next ten days.In conclusion,I wish to grow together,study together and we can be good friends at last.thank you!保研面试英语自我介绍5Im from nanjing university of __, very honored to receive my dream schools research interview, what came to my desire of learning, one step closer to my ideal goal.Then I think from three aspects to introduce my personal situation, teachers professional learning respectively introduced, practice experience and personal career planning.First of all, I very pay attention to professional knowledge learning in college.I usually study very hard, always stay in every exam grade 10, won the first scholarship twice, once a second-class scholarship, also with excellent academic performance and overall quality, won the national scholarship.In addition to strengthen the professional performance, but also a lot of reading various books in my spare time, accumulative total more than 100, an average of 1 week to complete at least two books to read, but also self-study completed common office software such as SPSS, strengthened my knowledge background and speaking skills.Secondly, I also very pay attention to the accumulation ofpractical experience.During the university, I took an active part in all kinds of professional activities organized by the school, such as business planning competition, in the game, Im using professional knowledge to write a business plan, in the field of more than 200 copies of a business plan, before entering the top 10, the qualification for the finals, and through several rounds of fierce competition, eventually won the second prize.By attending these fully improve their business ability, in the process of several modifications to deepen the understanding of this professional knowledge.In addition to participate in school activities, I also actively assist the teacher to participate in the two enterprise comprehensive management consulting projects, to help enterprises set up operational management system, in-depth enterprise actual contact with marketing, finance, human resources management work, these precious enterprise field experience make me to the enterprise management and operation with vivid cognition, also more deepened my interest in business management.Finally, I design the detailed career planning.I know that in order to understand how the enterprise operation, undergraduate knowledge alone is not enough, so I choseyour school of business management professional postgraduate student.Your school is in the field of enterprise management has a pivotal position, I always dreamed that your school has a strong faculty team, let me very yearning.If I can enter your school, I want to be under the guidance of teachers, further in-depth study of human resource management in enterprise management knowledge.。
英文招聘简历范文As a highly motivated and detail-oriented professional with a strong background in human resources, I am seeking new opportunities to contribute to a dynamic and forward-thinking organization. 作为一名积极进取、注重细节的专业人士,我在人力资源领域有着坚实的背景,我正在寻求新的机会,为充满活力和前瞻性的组织做出贡献。
With over 5 years of experience in talent acquisition, employee relations, and performance management, I have honed my skills in identifying top talent, fostering a positive work environment, and driving employee engagement. 在人才招聘、员工关系和绩效管理方面拥有超过5年的经验,我在识别顶尖人才、营造积极的工作环境和推动员工参与方面有着独到的见解。
I am proficient in using various HRIS and ATS systems, and have a proven track record of streamlining recruitment processes and enhancing data-driven decision making. 我精通各种人力资源信息系统和申请追踪系统,并且在简化招聘流程和增强基于数据的决策方面有着丰富的经验。
In my previous role, I successfully implemented a new employee wellness program that resulted in a 15% increase in employee satisfaction and a 10% decrease in turnover. 在我之前的工作中,我成功实施了一个新的员工健康项目,导致员工满意度上升了15%,员工流失率降低了10%。
HUMAN PERFORMANCE IN DEFAULT REASONINGFrancis Jeffry Pelletier Renée ElioDepartment of Philosophy Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of Alberta University of AlbertaEdmonton, Alberta Edmonton, AlbertaCanada T6G 2E5Canada T6G 2H1jeffp@cs.ualberta.ca ree@cs.ualberta.caI. BackgroundThere has long been a history of studies investigating how people (“ordinary people”) perform on tasks that involve deductive reasoning. The upshot of these studies is that people characteristically perform some deductive tasks well but others badly. For instance, studies show that people will typically perform MP (“modus ponens”: from ‘If A then B’ and ‘A’, infer ‘B’) and bi-conditional MP (from: ‘A if and only if B’ and ‘A’, infer ‘B’) correctly when invited to make the inference and additionally can discover of their own accord when such inferences are appropriate. On the other hand, the same studies show that people typically perform MT (“modus tollens”: from ‘If A then B’ and ‘not-B’, infer ‘not-A’) and biconditional MT badly. They not only do not recognize when it is appropriate to draw such inferences, but also they will balk at doing them even when they are told that they can make it. Related to these shortcomings seems to be the inability of people to understand that contrapositives are equivalent (that ‘If A then B’ is equivalent to ‘If not-B then not-A’). [Studies of people’s deductive inference-drawing abilities have a long history, involving many studies in the early 20th century concerning Aristotelian syllogisms. But the current spate of studies draws much of its impetus from Wason (Wason, 1968; see also Wason & Johnson-Laird, 1972). ] The general conclusion seems to be that there are specific areas where “ordinary people” do not perform very logically. This conclusion will not come as a surprise to teachers of elementary logic, who have long thought that the majority of “ordinary people” are inherently illogical and need deep and forceful schooling in order to overcome this flaw.There has been a similar history–although somewhat shorter–of studies investigating how people perform on tasks that involve probabilistic reasoning. The upshot of these studies is that people characteristically make a number of errors because they do not pay attention to certain relevant information and because they give undue importance to certain kinds of irrelevant information. The study of the types of errors people make on this probabilistic reasoning has come to be called “heuristics and biases” because the underlying assumption is that people have inbuilt or inherent biases as part of their mental equipment that causes them to ignore or give undue status to some information. Usually it is claimed that these biases stem from people having certain rule-of-thumb heuristics which allow them to evaluate information quickly and efficiently in “normal” circumstances but which will lead people astray in other circumstances. (Much of this work stems from Kahneman & Tversky: see Kahneman et al 1982 and Evans 1987).Using a similar methodology, researchers have found that people’s decision-making reasoning deviates from the prescriptions of decision theory in a number of regards. Many of the conclusions reached here mirror the “heuristics and biases” approach used in the probabilistic reasoning studies: people simply have tendencies to ignore certain information because of the (evolutionary) necessity to make these types of decisions quickly. This gives rise to “biases” in judgments concerning what they “really” want to do. (See Baron 1994 and Yates 1990).So, there is a long tradition of finding “ordinary people” wanting in their abilities to perform logical inferences, whether in deductive logic, probabilistic reasoning, or decision making. Yet perhaps we can see something of a difference in the three cases. In the second and third cases there is no universal agreement as to what the “correct” underlying theory is. In the case of decision making there are alternatives to decision-theoretic formalizations. And in the case of probabilistic reasoning there are at least the two alternatives of subjective probability and frequency theories. Some researchers have argued that people are not in fact so bad at probabilistic reasoning when the information is presented in the right way and we recognize what the “really right” conclusions are. Gigerenzer and his colleagues (see Gigerenzer 1991, 1994, 1998 for example) think that all the flaws discovered by researchers in this tradition are due to their adherence to a false theory of probability–subjective probabilities rather than the correct frequency theory. And Cohen (1981) proposed a new system of probability theory that was intended to capture the sort of probabilistic reason that people actually follow. (His “Baconian probability theory”).In the probability theory and decision theory cases there is disagreement over what the normatively correct underlying theory is. Hence, when people’s performance is measured there can be questions aboutwhether they are performing “correctly” or not. If Theory1 is the normatively right theory for the field, thenthey are performing badly; but if Theory2 is the normatively right theory in the field, then they areperforming correctly. Related to this is yet another idea: One might say that in certain fields there simply is no other standard than what people in fact do. In determining how North Americans distinguish green from blue, for example, there is no real concept of right and wrong in the task. Some people draw the boundary in one place, some in another place; we can tell whether there are identifiable subgroups who all draw it at one location while other subgroups draw it in another place; and we can tell whether someone is different from the majority in where s/he draws the line. But there is no real notion of “draws the blue/green boundary incorrectly”; all that exists is how people in fact do it. This attitude is often called “psychologistic” because it locates the object of the study (or the normativity of the theory) in the psychology of people and denies that there is any “external standard of correctness” for the field.One can imagine that decision theory and even probability theory are psychologistic in this way: there is no notion of “correct inference” other than what people actually do. The correct probability theory (for example) could be some sort of generalization of how people actually reason probabilistically; and therefore when we say that someone is making a mistake in probabilistic reasoning, all we mean is that the person deviates from what people normally do in this regard. Cohen’s (1981) view is essentially of this nature; he denies that people as a species can be shown to be irrational because ‘rationality’ is the sort of notion that is defined as what people’s underlying capacities have them do in the relevant circumstances.It is somewhat more difficult to imagine the psychologistic response being made in the realm of deductive reasoning. The reason for this is that we in fact have a perfectly clear “outside standard” of what counts as correct deductive reasoning, namely, preserves truth from premises to conclusion. If there were agreement in the probability or decision theories about what the “outside standard” is, then the psychologistic response would be seen as less plausible in those fields also. But once the possibility of a psychologistic attitude is brought up in the deductive arena, we will find some theorists arguing for a “relevance logic” or a “fuzzy logic” or … , on the grounds that “this is the way people actually reason”. II. IntroductionNon-Monotonic Logics is the name given to any logic (i.e., any formal, symbolic system) with this feature:S 1, S2,…Sn|- C and yet it is false that S1, S2,…Sn, Sn+1|- CThat is, it is possible to go from a valid argument to an invalid argument merely by adding more information to the premises (and not deleting any other premise). This formal property is related to properties of counterfactual conditionals (where adding more information to the antecedent of such a conditional can make the truth-value of the entire conditional change from true to false), and to prima facie reasoning in ethics and law (where conclusions of such reasoning tell us what is right or legal in the absence of contravening factors). And many researchers have claimed that similar patterns of reasoning occur in many different fields. As a whole, this type of reasoning (whether or not it is formalized so as to exhibit the non-monotonic logic feature) is called “default reasoning”.Probability theory allows for the probabilistic value of “A, given B” to be greater than the the value of “A, given both B and C”, and that to be greater than the value of “A, given B and C and D”, etc., so there are many attempts to accommodate all default reasoning within probability theory. (Pearl 1988, Bacchus 1991). Because this way of looking at default reasoning presumes to assign a numerical value between 0 and 1 to sentences (given a background), this is called a quantitative theory of default reasoning. Besides probability theory, another quantitative theory of default reasoning is fuzzy logic.Opposed to the quantitative theories are the qualitative theories. These theories do not assign some number between 0 and 1 to sentences, but rather give sentences one of two values: either True or False. (Or sometimes a third value, Uncertain/Undefined, is allowed; and sometimes a fourth value. [See Belnap 1978, where the four values are: True, False, Both True and False, Neither True nor False]. But if there are too many possible values then such a qualitative theory slides into a quantitative theory.) Classical examples of the qualitative theories of default reasoning are Reiter’s (1980) default logic, McCarthy’s (1980) circumscription, and Moore’s (1985) autoepistemic logic (among others).Even within just the qualitative or quantitative camp, there are a variety of differences among the different theories, both in their overall outlook and methodology and in the class of inferences that they each sanction as being valid default arguments. It is to this issue that we wish to address our next remarks.III. How Should We Decide on Valid Default Inferences?In humans, not all of our information about the world is stored in an explicit form in our minds; instead much of it is implicit in that it is a consequence of, or follows from, other information which is stored explicitly. The reason for this psychological truism is that it would be incredibly inefficient, incredibly wasteful of memory, etc., if everything that we knew were to be mentally entered in “longhand”for our inspection. Instead only some of our knowledge is explicitly stored, and much other information can be recovered or inferred from this explicit store. For instance, none of us has explicitly stored the fact that there is no roadrunner in our refrigerator; yet we know this nonetheless. And the way we know it is that it (somehow) follows from explicitly stored facts about our refrigerator and the locations of roadrunners. The goal of the constructors of “knowledge bases” is to mimic this manner of storage. It is commonly believed by these researchers that this is the only way that major advances will occur in computational information storage.One of the ways we infer these implicit pieces of knowledge is by default reasoning. Most researchers in this area think this is the most pervasive form of reasoning in our everyday life. It occurs whenever we wish to draw new conclusions from old information, where the old information does not deductively guarantee the truth of the new conclusions. For example, from our general knowledge that birds typically can fly, we conclude that our neighbor’s new pet bird can fly.…despite the acknowledged possibility that he might have managed to buy a roadrunner. Two quotations taken almost at random from researchers in the area show the attitude which is pretty universally adopted.Most of what we know about the world, when formalized, will yield an incomplete theoryprecisely because we cannot know everything—there are gaps in our knowledge. The effectof a default rule is to implicitly fill in some of those gaps by a form of plausible reasoning...Default reasoning may well be the rule, rather than the exception, in reasoning about theworld since normally we must act in the presence of incomplete knowledge ...Moreover,...most of what we know about the world has associated exceptions and caveats.(Reiter 1978)It is commonly acknowledged that an agent need not, indeed cannot, have absolutejustification for all of his beliefs. An agent often assumes, for example, that a certain memberof a particular kind has a certain property simply because it is typically true that entities ofthat kind have that property. .... Such default reasoning allows an agent to come to a decisionand act in the face of incomplete information. It provides a way of cutting off the possiblyendless amount of reasoning and observation that an agent might perform.... (Selman &Kautz 1989)We see here that the artificial intelligence community (or at least the knowledge representation subdivision of it) believes that humans explicitly store only a portion of the information that they know, and that when called upon, they typically use some sort of default reasoning to infer the rest.What might also be noted in these quotes, and any other quotes that one might wish to bring up from this literature, is that they all justify the search for a formal theory of default reasoning by appeal to human performance. “It is because humans do such-and-such task so well….” or “People can get around in the world with no problems…” are typical of the justification given for the whole enterprise. This is much different than the case of logic or arithmetic where there is some “external standard” that is independent of how humans reason logically or arithmetically. In the cases of logic and arithmetic we would probably not wish our artificial agents to mirror human performance, because we have the desire that these agents should compute the answers correctly according to the external standard. But in the case of default reasoning there is no standard which is external to how humans perform their default reasoning. Another way of putting the point, using the language developed above, is that default reasoning (unlike logic and arithmetic) is psychologistic in nature; it is by definition the study of how people perform on certain types of problems and in certain types of situations. There simply is no other standard against which to judge how good some abstract system of default inference is, nor any other standard with which to compare artificial agents that embody such a system. And so it follows that any judgment of the correctness of a proposed system of default reasoning will be as a test of the system against the way humans perform on that reasoning problem. (This outlook on default reasoning, augmented by many quotations from AI researchers who would appear to believe the same, can be found in Pelletier & Elio 1997).IV. The Non-Monotonic Benchmark ProblemsDespite the fact that all the researchers in the field appeal to the goodness of human performance as their justification for employing default reasoning mechanisms in artificial agents, the truth is that none of them in fact have ever investigated how people actually employ default reasoning. A consequence of this is that the different proposed formalisms validate different sets of inferences, and there is no agreed-upon method to decide which inferences should be sanctioned as “really legitimate.” Recognizing that there was no accepted background for finding the extent of legitimate default inferences, Lifschitz (1989) set out a number of inferences that were supposed to be valid in any proposed default reasoning system. Different groups of these problems were addressed to different aspects of the default reasoning process, so that perhaps not every reasoning system needed to accommodate all problems; but for any area that a system proposed a mechanism, it was to be able to deal at least with the inferences relevant to that area. We call these problems “the Benchmark Problems”, and the accepted answers that were proposed for these problems in Lifschitz (1989) the “AI answers” to the Benchmark Problems.Although one might accept the legitimacy of establishing a set of benchmark problems in this way because these are the areas in which default reasoning is to be employed by artificial agents, one might nonetheless wonder about the legitimacy of determining the AI answers as a matter of agreement among the various researchers. After all, if it is true that the realm of default reasoning is psychologistic and that therefore the correct answers are determined by the way “ordinary people” will (on the whole) use the method, then the fact that some elite subgroup of people think the answers should be such-and-so is not a good justification. For one thing, their opinions might be colored by how their systems perform. More importantly, an individual’s intuitions are not a reliable guide to how the population as a whole treats the phenomenon. In Pelletier & Elio (1997) we have investigated the various reasons researchers give for allowing their own intuitions to be their sole guide in this regard and for not engaging in large-scale investigations of how it is manifested in the population as a whole. We did not find any of these reasons very compelling, and recommended that researchers undertake such studies in order to determine the correct direction for their formal theories to follow.The present paper sets out the preliminaries for such work, and gives some very tentative results. Despite the tentative nature of the results, we think they should give default reasoning researchers pause in their confidence that they have in fact fathomed the true nature of the reasoning process they are trying to model.We will discuss only one area here from Lifschitz’s list of Benchmark Problems, namely the ones he calls “Basic Default Inference”, his Problems #1–#4. As stated in his article they are:Each of Problems 1-4, what Lifschitz called the basic default reasoning problems, concerns two objects governed by one or more default rules. Additional information is given to indicate that one of the objects (at least) does not follow one of the default rules. We refer to this as the exception object (for that default rule). The problem then asks for a conclusion about the remaining object. We refer to this as the object-in-question.It is clear from Figure 1 that the four default reasoning problems are variations on the same theme. Problem 2 includes the extra information that Block B is red, but we are still to conclude that it is on the table. Problem 3 mentions two default rules: the exception object violates the default concerning location, and the object-in-question, Block B, violates the default rule about color, but we are still to conclude that Block B follows the default location rule. Problem 4 states only that Block A might violate the default rule, in contrast with Problem 1, which states with certainty that there is an exception to the rule.For all these problems, the given default conclusion is that Block B obeys the default rule concerning location. According to the AI answers – that is, according to the collective wisdom of researchers into nonmonotonic theories – the existence of an exception object for a default rule, or additional information about that exception object, should have no bearing on a conclusion drawn about any other object when using that rule. Extra information about the object in question itself (e.g., Block B's color) should also have no bearing on whether a default rule about location applies. And being an exception object for some other default rule should have no bearing on whether it does or does not follow the present default rule.An implicit but important assumption here is that a logic for manipulating assertions of this form can be developed for non-monontonic reasoning without regard for the semantic content of the lexical items. Given these formal problems about blocks and tables, it seems easy to accept the idea that object color should have no "logical" bearing on whether a default about object location is applied. Yet it is equally easy to imagine real-world scenarios in which it makes (common) sense that an object's color might be predictive of or at least related to an object's default location (e.g., how an artist or designer might organize work items in a studio). We do not wish to confound people’s logical abilities with their ability to “look up”information they have stored in memory. And so we would want to test them on scenarios that they have some “feel” for but which they have no stored information about.V. An Experiment into Basic Default ReasoningWe investigated two factors concerning the exception object that intuitively seemed likely to influence plausible conclusions about the object in question: the specificity of information about how the exception object violates the default rule, and the apparent similarity of the exception object to the object in question. It is well known (Evans 1987) that posing information in negative form is more difficult for people to deal with in such tasks as drawing inferences than is the same information posed in positive form. Thus we wished to investigate whether the presence of an explicit negation (as the Benchmark Problems had) caused more difficulties in processing these problems than giving positive information concerning the object (which would entail the negative information). The negative form can be seen to “unspecific” with respect to information conveyed: saying that a block is not on the table does not say where it is, but saying that the block is on the floor not only implies that it is not on the table but also gives the specific information as toits location. Interestingly, the issue of how negation should be handled in the Prolog programming language is also an issue of some complexity, perhaps mirroring the difficulties that people have in using negative information.Most people who have thought about default reasoning have considered the possibility that the willingness of someone to draw a given inference perhaps is dependent on the specific lexical items or situations being discussed, and it therefore has nothing to do with logic – that is, nothing to do with the logical form of the inferences to be drawn. In particular for Problems 1-4, one might speculate that the amount of perceived similarity between the exception object and the object-in-question would influence whether subjects thought the object in question should behave like the exception object or should follow the default rule. Thus one of the variables to be manipulated was how much similarity was stated to hold between the two objects.Subjects. Eighty subjects enrolled in an introductory psychology course participated for partial credit towards an optional experiment-participation component of their course.Design. There were two between-subject independent variables. The first was the specificity of the information about the exception object. In Benchmarks 1-4, the manner in which an object violates the default rule is unspecified (e.g., Block A is not on the table) We call this the non-specific form. The specific form of the problem identified a particular state for the exception (e.g., Block A is in the cabinet). The second between-subject variable was who the agent solving the problem was supposed to be: a human (actually, the subject) or a robot. Interviews with pilot-study subjects indicated that this made a difference in the kinds of answers generated. (That is, people might take a different view about the inferences they would make with these default logic questions were they in the scenario described in the experiment from those inferences they would want or expect an intelligent robot to produce). We had no a priori prediction or intuition about the human vs. robot dimension, but it seemed an interesting meta-cognitive issue to explore.There was one within-subject variable: object similarity. Each subject answered both a low similarity and a high-similarity version of Benchmarks 1-4.The low similarity version had sentences corresponding to just those assertions in the original Benchmark. The high similarity version had additional statements describing commonalties shared by the exception object and object in question. Figure 3 illustrates two of the four combinations of specificity and similarity for Benchmark #2.Low similarity / Non-specific Form /HumanYou know There is a Craftsman electric drill and there is also a Black & Decker electric drill.Electric drills are normally stored in the utility cabinet.The Black and Decker drill is a cordless model.You also know The Craftsman drill is not in the utility cabinet.Question: What is reasonable to decide about where the Black and Decker drill is?High similarity / Non-specific form/ RobotRobot knows Western Construction and ConCo Consulting have each submitted confidential bids forcontract work.Confidential bids are normally kept in the Department Head’s office.The bid by ConCo Consulting was prepared by an outside consultant.Robot also knows The bid by Western Construction is in the auditor's office.The Western Construction and the ConCo bids were considerably lower than the other bidsthat were received.Both these companies have good track records for consulting work.Their bids were received 2 hours after the deadline date, which was Friday at noon.Question: What is reasonable to decide about where the ConCo bid is?Figure 2: Alternative Forms of Benchmark 2It is important to appreciate that the additional statements in the high-similarity condition do not enjoin us to conclude that the two objects behave identically with respect to the default rule. On the other hand, we designed these assertions under the guiding principle that they could, conceivably, constitute an explanation as to why an object might not obey a default rule. For example, in the "contract bids" cover story, the extra assertions describe a set of circumstances that could explain why a particular bid is not where it is supposed to be by default: it came in late, it was a very low bid, and it comes from a good company. Maybe these facts together constitute a reason why it is sitting in the auditor's office. They certainly don't entail the conclusion that any bid should not follow the default rule and a problem solver would have to do a good bit of work to weave these into an explanation.Two different cover stories were developed for each Benchmark. We counterbalanced which cover story was used as the low similarity version and which was used as the high-similarity version across subjects.Procedure. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either human-specific, robot-specific, human-nonspecific, or robot-nonspecific problems. The eight problems (four Benchmarks under two similarity versions) were randomly ordered and presented in booklet form. To lessen the chance that subjects would detect the underlying similarity among the problems, we put one filler problem between each of the randomly-ordered benchmark problems. These filler problems were similar in format and also asked for common-sense reasoning conclusions. The instructions emphasized that there were no right or wrong answers to these problems, and that the goal of the experiment was to discover something about how people make (or how robots should make) plausible conclusions in situations for which there is only general information. Subjects generated their own answers and were told that “can’t tell” was also an acceptable answer.Results. We coded subjects’ answers about the object-in-question according to one of four answer categories: (a) it followed the AI answer, (b) it followed the exception object, (c) it was some other answer, or (d) “can’t tell.” The AI answer for Benchmark 2 (drills) is that the Black and Decker drill is “in the utility cabinet”; the exception-answer is “on the workbench.” An answer that would be coded as “other”might be “in the mail between the Dept Head and President” for the contract-bid example. We converted the subject data into the proportion of answers generated in each category for each problem; under this scheme, answer category becomes another factor.Let us take a first quick look at the percentage of answers that followed the AI answer:Problem%AI Answer178%275%356%477%Table I: Percent of answers agreeing with AI Answer on the Benchmark ProblemsIt is clear that Problem #3 is significantly different from Problems #1, #2, and #4. (All results we describe as distinct are significant at the p=.05 level). This suggests that the more default rules an object is known to violate, the more “generally exceptionable” the object is, and the more likely the object is to violate other defaults.Turning our attention to the issue of similarity we see:。