CSA[中国验厂论坛]_CAP Example V1.1

  • 格式:xls
  • 大小:122.00 KB
  • 文档页数:1

Audited by: Production Engineer Audited on :
ID
CA Priority
Findings
Root Cause CA Date CA Incharge CA details CA DueDate
PA plan 发现问题
原因分析
改善日
改善計劃負責人
改善內容
改善完成日
预防措施
5.1.1
1
Operating instructions:
1. In SMT workshop, no WIs were found for the checking position.
2. In the final assembly line, two different twisting force requirements for the screw driver are found in one WI.(One is 1.5-2.5 KGF.CM, the other one is 4.0-5.0KGF.CM)
1、因为SMT全为自动过回流,主要是针对表面贴装料件,所有检验标准均采用IPC-610-D标准,SMT所有员工岗前均经过该标准培训考核,已能熟练掌握此国际标准,故没有挂于现场。

2、由于工程部IE制作SOP时采用从以前其它文件模板上复制,故由于疏忽导致没有将以前规格删除掉;
1. The SMT parts are sent to the reflow-soldering automatically, the main control part is for the surface mount components. All the checking method is based on the IPC-610-D, all the SMT operators are trained before,they can handle this criteria very well, so we do not hang the WI on-site.
2. The IE engineer copy the related requirement from the old file, they do not check this part and do not delete the wrong parts.
13-Jul-07张三
1、将IPC-610-D 电子组装可接收标准中适用于SMT 的部分摘录下来,并转化为内部检验标准粘贴到现场,以供检查员使用。

2、立刻对该工位电批实际扭力进行测试,F=2.3Kgf,经工程部主管确认此扭力符合产品要求,对前面下拉产品抽测15PCS ,发现均为此规格内,后面笔误扭力,暂划掉,签名注上日期,现新SOP 已重新发行。

1. Excerpt the related inspection standards form IPC-610-D into the internal checking WI, and place on-site.
2. Calibrate the screw driver
immediately, the wisting force F=2.3Kgf is correct. Check 15pcs products from the products manufactured before, it is OK. Delete the wrong requirement from the WI, sign the name with date, the new SOP is published yet.
15-Jul-071、针对现有SMT 焊点检验人员进行档案检查,确保检验人员是经过培训合格的,对所检焊点的焊接标准明确,判定标准把握程度相对合理。

2、工程部已将所有的SOP 重新审核评估,明确操作标准,对有误的SOP 进行换版修订并重新发行,以供生产线使用。

1. Check the dossier of the inspectors worked at SMT, make sure all the
inspectors had been trained before and got the certification.
2. All the SOPs used now has been re-evaluated by the engineering
department, make the operating standard clear. Correct the wrong infromations in the SOPs, revise and re-publish.
Corrective Action Plan proposed by Factory date proposed to GSA
Person in charge from factory Details of CA
When will the CA be implemented
Details of preventive action will be taken by factory Priority 1: Must 2: Shall
CAP of XXX factory audit
CA :PA Plan:CA Date:CA InCharge:CA Details:CA DueDate:。