翻译批评与赏析概讲课稿
- 格式:ppt
- 大小:756.00 KB
- 文档页数:82
第十讲翻译批评第33课翻译批评--翻译批评原则(1)一、什么是翻译批评?翻译批评是指在一定的社会条件下、遵循一定的翻译原则、并运用一定的方法,对某一译作所作的评价。
这种评价必须避免随意性和盲目性、杜绝胡批乱评和感想式的点评,应该在一定的理论指导下,历史地、客观地、全面地、系统地去观察和分析翻译过程和翻译结果,必须尽可能做到客观、科学和公正。
从事翻译批评的人必须对翻译本身,对它的实质、可行性、原则、方法、目的、作用等基本问题有一个系统的认识。
他不仅具有良好的职业素质、严肃认真和一丝不苟的工作态度,而且应当同时是一"译者、译文阅读者、译文分析家、翻译理论家与翻译史家"(Berman,1995)(许钧,袁筱一:"试论翻译批评",《翻译学报》1997年第1期)。
翻译批评就其目的而言可分为两类:1)为欣赏而作的翻译批评;2)为纠正错误而作的翻译批评。
前者重在分析出自优秀翻译家笔下的模范之译作,评价其艺术价值、所遵循的翻译原则及采用的相关技巧,意在立为范文,为翻译界同行或初学者视为楷模而学之;后者则重在剖析粗制滥造之译作,分析并纠正其中的错译和误译,意在警示他人以此为鉴。
不过,这两类翻译批评并不能截然分开,因为二者之间有时也会出现互相交叉的现象(如为欣赏而作的翻译批评有时也带有一点有关误译或败笔的批评)。
翻译批评就其思想方法而论可分为3类:1)功能性批评(functional approach), 2)分析性批评(analytical approach)和3)对比性批评(comparative approach)。
功能性批评在分析和评论译文时较为笼统,其重点在整个译作的思想内容而不顾及语言细节。
在某种程度上来说,它是一个主观的批评方法,类似老师凭印象给学生打分。
分析性批评则是较为细致客观的剖析,译文中的每一个词语、每一句话、每一语段和段落都会对照原文加以对比和分析,错误的译文被分门别类地挑出来加以评论,并提出改进意见;好的译文挑出来加以褒扬。
英汉翻译评析(附参考译文)英汉翻译讲解(1)I.英汉之间的差别:“对于中国学生最有用的帮助是让他认识英语和汉语的差别。
”------吕叔湘国内学者的共识是:汉语是综合性的,描写性的,而英语是分析性的,逻辑性的。
在语言学上最重要的区别在于形合和意合的对比(contrast between hypotaxis and parataxis),英语重形合(形式上的融合),汉语重意合(意思或意境的融合)。
在句法方面,有学者形象地把英汉比喻为以下几种:1.雄孔雀/雄狮-----即英语习惯于把最着重的事物放在句首先说出来,开门见山,一语破的,然后再把各种标志一条条补述,一步步交代,慢条斯理,从容不迫,形成一条头短尾长地线性链,象头小尾大地雄孔雀。
而汉语则相反,其线性序列的展开好比画龙点睛,先把外围的环境与衬托一一交代周到,最后点出话语的信息中心,水到渠成,给人以豁然开朗之感,形成雄狮型头大尾小地局式。
例如:I was all the more delighted when, as a result of the initiative of your Government it proved possible to reinstate the visit so quickly.译文:由于贵国政府的提议,才得以这样快地重新实现访问。
这使我感到特别高兴。
又如: The assertion that it was difficult, if not impossible, for a people to enjoy its basic rights unless it was able to determine freely its political status and to ensure freely its economic, social and cultural development was now scarcely (不足地,不充分地;一定不,绝不)contested (斗争;比赛).译文:如果一个民族不能自由地决定其政治地位,不能自由地保证其经济、社会和文化的发展,要享受其基本权利,即使不是不可能,也是不容易的。
Lecture OneOn Verse TranslationI. Part One: On Verse Translation1. Marcus Tullius Cicero (马尔库斯·图留斯·西塞罗,106 B.C.-43 B.C.)[荷马史诗《奥德赛》译者]His opinions on translation:Translate not as an interpreter, but as an orator, keeping the same ideas and forms, namely, the figures of thought;In language, conform to our usage; not hold it necessary to render word for word, but preserve the general style and force of the language;Count the words out to the reader like coins, but pay them by weight;Translate flexibly to make the version superior to the original.2. Quintus Horatius flaccus (贺拉斯,65 B.C.-8 B.C.)[诗人、翻译家]His opinions on translation:Do not be a literal translator, faithfully rendering word for word from the original language;A translator who is faithful to the original will not translate word for word.3. St. Jerome (347?-420)In literary translation, he translated the original into his own language by conquest.4. Gavin Douglas (1475-1522) [A famous Scot poet and literary translator]Flexible and free translation rather than literal translation;5. Nicolas Grimald (1519-1562) [A poet and translator; A translator of Cicero’s works]The Version should be as concise as the original so as to keep the complete original style;The faithfulness to the original should be the top principle of translation;6. George Chapman (1559-1634) [poet, translator of Greek classics]Against rigid word-for-word translation;Against over-free translation. (two extremes)7. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)Translate the poetry in essay style;(What is the essence of poetry? Something left after the original poem has been translated into the version in the form of essay; the poetic form is nothing but shining outer ornament or decoration.)8. John Denham (1615-1669) [A famous translator in the 17th century;A poet and literary critics]No faithfulness in verse translation;Translate poetry in form of poetry;Faithful to the original meaning rather than the original form;Add something new to compensate for the loss aroused by the alteration of thetimes, languages, and places.9. Abraham Cowley (1618-1667)[An important poet, critic, and translator; Famous for his translation of pindar’s poems]It’s ridiculous to translate a poem literally;Recreate freely with the original theme to make the version superior or equal to the original.10. Wentworth Dillon, earl of Roscommon (1633-1685)[A poet and translator; His main contribution to translation: translation theory; Essay on translated verse.] Poetry must be translated by poets.A friendly relationship must be set between the original author and the translator; Choose the original materials of his own style to translate;Comprehend the original thoroughly, and be faithful to the essential meaning of the original without addition or distraction.11. John Dryden (1631-1700)Translation is an art;The equivalence of beauty between the original and the version12. Alexander Pope (1688-1744)A translator must be faithful to the original to the most degree;A translator should not try to surpass the original author;Equivalent to the original style;Against literal translation as well as imitation.13. William Cowper (1731-1800)[ A famous translator of Homer’s epics]Against Pope’s free style of wording;A midway between metaphrase and imitation;The highest principle of translation: faithful to the original; tightly close to the original;Against translating Homer’s epic in English rhyme pattern.14. Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)[ poet and critic]Different language is formed with different principle; hence the same expressions of the different languages do not mean the same beauty and grace all the way;The successful translation depends on the choice of the style.15. Pushkin (1799-1837)[The greatest people’s poet in Russia; a prominent representative of Russian literature in 19th century; a verse translator.]A translator must have his own freedom in the choice of original materials;A translator should enjoy sufficient freedom in translation; (imitation and adaptation);A translator must convey the original features as completely as possible.16. Rukovsky (茹科夫斯基,1783-1852)[The first true lyric poet in Russia]A verse translator should have more freedom in translation than an essay translator does; (An essay translator is a slave of the original author, while a verse translator an enemy.)A translator should only translate the original works with the same quality and flavor of his own. (Roscommom)17. Lermontov (莱蒙托夫,1814-1841)[A great poet after Pushkin]Translated freely and creatively to show the representative features of the original; The evaluation of a version depends on the literary value of the version as a Russian literary work.18. Fet (费特)[A typical representative of the pure-art poets]The artistic works have nothing to do with the people;The poetic creation should break away from the vulgar people;The wonderfulness in form cannot be separated from the genius of the work. Translate as literally as possible;19. Theodore H. Savory [A lingual scholar; his major work: The Art of Translation] Translation is an art: Literary translation as painting; scientific translation photography;His 12 descriptive principles on translation:1) A translation must give the words of the original;2) A translation must give the ideas of the original;3) A translation should read like an original work;4) A translation should read like a translation;5) A translation should reflect the style of the original;6) A translation should reflect the style of the translator;7) A translation should read as a contemporary of the original;8) A translation should read as a contemporary of the translator;9) A translation may add to or omit from the original;10) A translation may never add to or omit from the original;11) A translation of verse should be in prose;12) A translation of verse should be in verse;20. 苏曼殊:诗歌之美,在乎气体;然其情思幼眇,抑亦十方同感。