English住吉的长屋
- 格式:docx
- 大小:2.57 MB
- 文档页数:8
住吉的长屋案例分析住吉的长屋是一座位于日本大阪的历史悠久的建筑,也是日本国宝级别的建筑,其独特的建筑风格和丰富的历史内涵吸引着众多游客和建筑学者前来参观和研究。
本文将对住吉的长屋进行深入分析,探讨其建筑特点、历史价值以及对当代建筑的启示。
住吉的长屋建筑风格独特,其采用了传统的日本古建筑风格,包括木质结构、斜屋顶、榻榻米等元素。
长屋的建筑结构非常坚固,经得起数百年的风吹雨打,展现出了日本古代建筑师的高超技艺和智慧。
同时,长屋的内部布局合理,起居空间与储藏空间相互配合,使得整个建筑既实用又美观。
这种建筑风格不仅展现了日本古代建筑的特点,也为当代建筑提供了宝贵的借鉴。
除了建筑风格,住吉的长屋还承载着丰富的历史价值。
据历史记录,长屋建于日本奈良时代,距今已有数百年的历史。
在这漫长的岁月中,长屋见证了日本社会的变迁,承载了许多历史事件和文化传统。
长屋的建筑风格、装饰图案、传统习俗等都反映了当时社会的风貌,对于研究日本古代社会和文化具有重要的参考价值。
因此,长屋被列为日本国宝,并受到了国家和社会的重视和保护。
住吉的长屋对当代建筑也有着重要的启示。
首先,长屋的木质结构和斜屋顶设计在抗震方面具有独特优势,这为当代建筑提供了宝贵的经验。
其次,长屋的内部布局合理,充分利用了空间,这对于当代城市建筑的空间规划和设计具有借鉴意义。
另外,长屋的传统装饰图案和建筑风格也为当代建筑注入了新的灵感和创意,使得建筑更加具有文化底蕴和艺术价值。
总之,住吉的长屋作为日本国宝级别的建筑,其建筑风格、历史价值以及对当代建筑的启示都具有重要意义。
通过对长屋的深入分析和研究,我们可以更好地理解古代建筑的精髓,同时也可以为当代建筑的发展提供宝贵的经验和启示。
希望长屋的价值能够得到更多人的关注和重视,为保护和传承历史文化做出更多的努力。
住吉的长屋1975年,当今最活跃,最具影响力的世界建筑大师之一的日本建筑师安藤忠雄完成了他的成名作——位于大阪住吉区的东邸,即“住吉的长屋”。
1979年,“住吉的长屋”获得日本建筑学会年度大奖。
他的设计概念和材料结合了国际现代主义和日本传统审美意识,由于他注重并理解建筑工艺技术的重要性,使赢得了建筑师和施工员的美称他最出名的著作之一就是完全的木结构——92年在西班牙参览的日本亭榭。
建筑师:安藤忠雄基地位置:日本大阪住吉区设计时间:1975/01- 1975/08施工时间:1975/10-1976/02基地面积:57㎡占地面积:34㎡总建筑面积:65㎡构造:清水混凝土、钢材、玻璃、石头等建构,地2层楼,中间庭院殊荣:1979 日本建筑学会赏《住吉的长屋》整体风格住吉的长屋的整体风格通常被人们评价为独特而冷洌深刻,具有抽象、洗炼、自我内向性压缩的审美情趣,其实是一定程度上禅宗思想简素、朴实的体现。
平面布局住吉的长屋的平面布局上,建筑师首先用混凝土的墙壁把狭窄而细长的基地围合了起来,从而限定了内部空间作为一个特别的场所和栖居的场所。
接下来,把这一似长方形的箱子进行了三等分,前和后为两层,中间部分为向天空开放的庭院。
前后部分的二层用无顶的桥连接起来,并有楼梯通向底层庭院。
建成平面占地面积34平方米,总建筑面积65平方米。
立面处理在立面处理上:住吉的长屋继承了传统长屋狭长的特点,但在立面处理时,较传统长屋要封闭。
住吉的长屋对外没有设置一个窗户,面向街道的墙壁是一个四角形的没有分割的立面,除了入口以外没有任何的装饰性元素。
从外部看似乎内部是没有光线的黑房子,且与外部缺乏交流,其实不然:长屋凹入处的墙板将光线反射到街道上,光线成为这座内向式住宅与街道相联系的调节器。
让进入内部的来访者感到惊讶,因为有了庭院而感到非常明亮。
其次,其立面的严格对称,一使建筑有均衡感,二使处于传统长屋区的建筑保留一定传统观念。
此外,通过将宅基地的三分之一设计为庭院,建筑覆盖率也可以达到60% ,充分合理的运用了用地。
住吉的长屋1975年,当今最活跃,最具影响力的世界建筑大师之一的日本建筑师安藤忠雄完成了他的成名作一一位于大阪住吉区的东邸,即“住吉的长屋”。
1979年,“住吉的长屋”获得日本建筑学会年度大奖。
他的设计概念和材料结合了国际现代主义和日本传统审美意识,由于他注重并理解建筑工艺技术的重要性,使赢得了建筑师和施工员的美称他最出名的著作之一就是完全的木结构——92年在西班牙参览的日本亭榭。
建筑师:安藤忠雄基地位置:日本大阪住吉区设计时间:1975/01- 1975/08施工时间:1975/10-1976/02基地面积:57 m2占地面积:34 m2总建筑面积:65 m构造:清水混凝土、钢材、玻璃、石头等建构,地2层楼,中间庭院殊荣:1979日本建筑学会赏《住吉的长屋》整体风格住吉的长屋的整体风格通常被人们评价为独特而冷洌深刻,具有抽象、洗炼、自我向性压缩的审美情趣,其实是一定程度上禅宗思想简素、朴实的体现。
中间部分为向天空开放的庭院。
前后部分的二层用无顶的桥连接起来,并有楼梯通向底层庭院。
建成平面占地面积34平方米,总建筑 面积65平方米。
平面布局 住吉的长屋的 平面布局上,建筑师 首先用混凝土的墙 壁把狭窄而细长的 基地围合了起来,从 而限定了部空间作 为一个特别的场所 和栖居的场所。
接下 来,把这一似长方形 的箱子进行了三等 分,前和后为两层,1卄山|口叫 ■ 匚i ~ )立面处理在立面处理上:住吉的长屋继承了传统长屋狭长的特点, 但在立 面处理时,较传统长屋要封闭。
住吉的长屋对外没有设置一个窗户, 面向街道的墙壁是一个四角形的没有分割的立面, 除了入口以外没有 任何的装饰性元素。
从外部看似乎部是没有光线的黑房子, 且与外部 缺乏交流,其实不然:长屋凹入处的墙板将光线反射到街道上 ,光线 成为这座向式住宅与街道相联系的调节器。
让进入部的来访者感到惊 讶,因为有了庭院而感到非常明亮。
其次,其立面的严格对称,一使W— j 仙— T ~ ~ i F" . 的■WL KIiCwl建筑有均衡感,二使处于传统长屋区的建筑保留一定传统观念。
住吉的长屋案例分析住吉的长屋是位于日本大阪市住之江区的一栋住宅,以其独特的设计理念和人文关怀而闻名。
它由建筑师吉村庄一设计,并于1994年完工。
长屋的建筑面积为226平方米,包括三个房间、一个厨房和一个起居室。
长屋的设计理念是将住宅设计为一个开放、宽敞的空间,以促进家庭成员之间的互动和沟通。
为了实现这个目标,建筑师将室内外空间无缝融合,使用了大量的玻璃墙和天窗。
这不仅能够让自然光线进入室内,还能够提供与外界的良好视野。
在设计中,建筑师还注重保护隐私,通过布局和绿化带来了良好的私密性。
长屋的外观设计简洁而现代,采用了灰色的外墙和黑色的屋顶。
外墙上有许多整齐排列的窗户,给予住宅一个独特的外观。
进入住宅后,人们会看到一个开放的起居室,连接着各个房间和厨房。
长屋的室内装饰简约而实用,采用了木地板和中性色调的墙壁,为整体空间增添了温暖和舒适感。
长屋的设计在功能性和使用性方面也非常出色。
建筑师灵活运用了可移动和可折叠的隔断墙,在需要时可以改变房间的大小和布局。
这种设计使长屋适应了不同的家庭成员和活动。
此外,住宅还设有一个室外庭院,让居民可以在户外享受阳光和新鲜空气。
长屋的设计不仅注重建筑本身,还注重与社区的互动。
建筑师吉村庄一积极与居民和社区组织合作,了解他们的需求和期望,并将这些考虑融入了设计中。
通过定期举办社区活动和开放日,长屋与周围社区建立了紧密的联系,并成为社区的重要组成部分。
总的来说,住吉的长屋是一栋独特而实用的住宅,以其开放的空间设计、精心布局和与社区的紧密互动而备受赞誉。
它是建筑师吉村庄一智慧与创意的结晶,同时也是人文关怀和社会责任的典范。
这个案例提供了一个很好的参考,为我们今后的住宅设计提供了启示。
住吉的长屋详细资料平面布局上,建筑师首先用混凝土的墙壁把狭窄而细长的基地围合了起来,从而限定了内部空间作为一个特别的场所和栖居的场所。
接下来,把这一似长方形的箱子进行了三等分,前和后为两层,中间部分为向天空开放的庭院。
前后部分的二层用无顶的桥连接起来,并有楼梯通向底层庭院。
建成平面占地面积34平方米,总建筑面积65平方米。
立面处理在立面处理上:住吉的长屋继承了传统长屋狭长的特点,但在立面处理时,较传统长屋要封闭。
住吉的长屋对外没有设置一个窗户,面向街道的墙壁是一个四角形的没有分割的立面,除了入口以外没有任何的装饰性元素。
从外部看似乎内部是没有光线的黑房子,且与外部缺乏交流,其实不然:长屋凹入处的墙板将光线反射到街道上,光线成为这座内向式住宅与街道相联系的调节器。
让进入内部的来访者感到惊讶,因为有了庭院而感到非常明亮。
其次,其立面的严格对称,一使建筑有均衡感,二使处于传统长屋区的建筑保留一定传统观念。
此外,通过将宅基地的三分之一设计为庭院,建筑覆盖率也可以达到60% ,充分合理的运用了用地。
住吉的长屋的立面处理,一方面大大降低了周围嘈杂环境的不利影响,满足了地处中心城区的住宅对私密性的要求,同时凸现了内部光线的丰富性。
中庭——空间流动的枢纽长屋在大阪是比较普遍的一种住宅形式。
近些年来,由于大量旧建筑的更新,大都改建成了独家独户的组装式住宅或集合式住宅,长屋就越来越少。
普通的长屋大约是以2间的宽度为一户的住宅,然后将其连续着排列而成的。
进入住宅里面有中庭或通道,以及后院。
中庭或过庭中有一些小的自然景色的空间。
由于我们的生活需要采光、通风、日照等,住吉的长屋的设计,安藤忠雄认为即使再小的房子,也要在中间设置一个庭院空间。
“无论是多么小的物质空间,其小宇宙中都应该有其不可替代的自然景色。
”为什么向自然开放的庭院是必须的呢?在高度工业化的社会里,环境污染、环境破坏都成为常态,在城市中,已经不存在无垢的自然。
内省的居所——安藤忠雄作品住吉的长屋阅读关键词:现代性与地域性比较阅读内省摘要:通过比较阅读,以及对远近历史环境的分析,试寻找出安藤所受日本传统的影响、对待历史的态度,和他应对现代性与地域性关系的策略。
1.历史背景与长屋设计理念的形成:20世纪初,密斯将建筑的普遍性追求到了极致。
他作为理想提出的“万能空间”与材料的工业化同时并进,通过极其简易的形态将它传播到了全世界。
60年代实现了经济高速增长的日本,城市中出现了大量生产的毫无个性的方盒子。
建筑不能使人感受到差异,人的欲望或思想没有进入的余地,人们对现代建筑的“崇高理想”渐渐反感。
60年代现代主义进入转折时期,安藤此时二十出头,正在形成自己的建筑观。
在60年代日本的经济增长中,新的思维模式逐渐形成。
以前人们认为是好的传统,如对物的珍惜,重视与近邻的关系,重视家庭和睦,与自然共生等传统正在消失。
经历了变革激烈的60年代后,安藤开始思考“运用现代建筑的材料和语言、几何学构成原理,使建筑同时具有时代精神和普遍性,将风光水等自然要素引入建筑的方法”,从而创造出根植于建筑场所的气候风土,又表现出其固有文化传统的建筑。
住吉的长屋,就是安藤这些思考的完整体现。
通过这样一个美丽的小住宅,安藤向导致“人的规格化、平均化”的标准化现代主义建筑宣战,实践着他关于人居理想的追求。
正因如此,Frampton 将安藤看做批判地域主义的成功实践者。
2.几何-场所-自然——长屋的总体理念住吉的长屋改造,基地在大阪住吉区,用地拥挤紧张,周围存在大片日本关西近代住宅形式——长屋。
具体用地宽2间、进深7间,共14坪左右,覆盖率限制在六成,在如此紧张的用地上,安藤却创造了充满诗意的栖居场所。
他切掉部分长屋,插入了表现抽象艺术的混凝土盒子,将关西人常年居住的长屋要素置换成现代建筑。
尽管有很多争议,令安藤骄傲的是,他“在完全抽象化的几何四方盒子中,将关西居民继承下来的传统居住方式,以及对自然的认识等全部装了进去”。
a course-long investigation of inveterate systems, sites, and buildings09Nov 20114CommentsAzuma Row House by Tadao Ando | Designing Architecture to Purposefully Make PeopleFeel uNCoMfoRTabLEThe Azuma Row House (Sumiyoshi, Osaka, Japan) was designed by Tadao Ando in 1976. Built in an old post WWII neighborhood of wooden row houses, his project replaced its predecessor with a modern interpretation of the urban context. Cast in concrete, Ando’s austere and functional design divides the site into three parts – two equally sized enclosed interior volumes flanking an open-air courtyard. Centralizing the courtyard makes it an integral part of circulation and the focus of everyday life. What makes this setup particularly unique is that there is no way to cross to either side of the house without passing through exterior and ultimately confronting nature. Despite the hardships that this may enforce on the inhabitants, Ando defends his design:At the time [mid-1970s], I thought of residential design as the creation of a place where people can dwell as they themselves intend. If they feel cold, they can put on an additional layer of clothing. If they feel warm, they can discard extraneous clothing. What is important is the space be, not a device for environmental control, but something definite and responsive to human life… No matter how advanced society becomes, institutionally or technologically, a house in which nature can be sensed represents for me the ideal environment in which to live.With subtle and careful presentation Ando forces occupants to experience the dynamic flows of nature every single day. Despite the advent of highly thermally controlled architecture, the environment’s energy flows are somehow an inherent experience in inhabiting the house. I’d like to explor e how this seemingly anachronistic and modest design approach affects the comfort and lifestyle of its victims, oops I mean tenants ;-)Tadao Ando is actually one of my favorite architects, and is world renowned for his stunning manipulation of air, light, and water. This project, his first residential commission, explores issues we’ve discussed in class regarding heat transfer, air flow, and light.Thermally Active Surfaces and flows: What kind of environment does Ando create?The building envelope of the Azuma Row House is simple and uniform — a continuous façade with no apertures, except for one small skylight. Apart from its inward –facing glass walls and minimal wood finish, the majority of the envelope is cast concrete, which has a very high specific heat capacity (0.880 J/(gK)), and therefore capable of absorbing a lot of heat energy. This trait affects the heating and cooling of the interior and courtyard in various waysCourtyard_ Constantly exposed to the sun, the concrete and stone slabsre ceive heat energy from the sun’s direct radiation, diffused sky radiation, and any rays reflected off of surrounding buildings. They cannot easily conduct or release this energy and stores it throughout the day, gradually increasing in temperature. The ground can retain a large amount of heat for hours, which can make standing in that space uncomfortable – think of asphalt on a summer day. Also since hot air molecules rise, the occupant space air temperature can become overheated and uncomfortable as well. This is a greater concern in the summer time when exposure and temperatures are high. Furthermore, by placing the exterior space at the center of the row house the building envelope’s surface area almost doubles,which can be a crucial matter for skin-loaded or envelope dominated structures. Expanding the threshold for hot or cool air to transfer across makes the thermal environment asymmetrical, less predictable, and uncomfortable.The Interior_ In each room there are four surfaces of exposed concrete. Although the floors are covered with wood slats providing insulation between the foot and slab, there is still conduction of heat energy through the walls. Bearing in mind the house’s small scale, there is likely considerable contact with the building envelope which prompts measurable heat loss from the human body – comfortable during warm seasons, frustrating during cold.The sixth surface of every room is a floor-to-ceiling plane of glass with a glass door. Although certain types of glass have relatively high heat capacities, the metal mullions that support the panes are highly conductive –not to mention that a building cannot be perfectly sealed. A significant temperature difference across this barrier will cause a convection current that will easily circulate warm air into a cooler courtyard, and vice versa, causing fluctuations in the room’s temperature.In addition, without any apertures to penetrate, radiation waves reflect off of the house’s exterior facade or are absorbed by it. Unlike the courtyard, this heat exchange occurs on the side the occupants do not have contact with. Since the thick thermal mass absorbs all of the heat, the interior remains cool. Again, despite the benefit in the summer, this kind of passive radiant heating could be very useful during the winter.Thermal Comfort_ After reading Heating, Cooling, and Lighting by Lechner we discussed the body’s thermal response to any environment, or its relationship with the space’s temperature profile. Many of the thermally dynamic characteristics of the Azuma House are beneficial during one season, and a burden during another. However, some issues like convection across thermal surfaces can always work against your desired comfort zone. Ando includes many conductive and convective thermal surfaces in his construction and few radiant sources. The volatility of convection patterns make air flow, heat transfer, and therefore room temperature asymmetrical and unpredictable.Natural Ventilation: How does Ando achieve reasonable comfort through passive design?As a skin-load or envelope dominated structure – with climate dependent cooling requirements– passive solar heating is a reliable method to keep the structure reasonably comfortable because it is an efficient transfer of heat energy between the climate and envelope that requires no fluid medium like in convection. Part of what makes these structures so easily influenced by their envelopes, are their large surface area-to-volume ratio, which creates a large gateway for heat loss. It’s interesting to see what fluid dynamics principles, if any, Ando utilized to make the space more comfortable by modern standards. To start, there are no mechanical systems in the structure for heating or cooling.Cross Ventilation_ Again, the building envelope is a continuous and uniform surface. There aren’t proper inlets or outlets to let wind through the interior spaces, as there no apertures at all. Therefore, no cross ventilation can occur.Stack Effect_ However, high-speed winds redirected over the row house can create a region of lower temperature that draws out the warm air from the courtyard. It produces something similar to a stack effect. When air in the courtyard gains heat energy due to high air temperature or thermal radiation, its buoyancy will decrease, causing it to rise up out of the courtyard. This is what prompts the convection of cool air from the interior to the exterior through the glass pane, as I mentioned above under Interior thermal flows. The rising warm air molecules leave a region of low pressure that draws the high pressure cool air into the void – as molecules always flow form groups of greater energy to groups of lower energy.High Mass Cooling_ The Azuma row house is a great example of Night ventilation of a thermal mass. The concrete slabs have a great capacity to hold heat that accumulated during the day and is gradually released as the surrounding environment cools in the evening. More specifically, at night, cool air circulates through the building and the heat in the thermal mass is released to the space above it, keeping it warm and renewing its own ability to re-absorb more energy the following day. This prevents sudden swings in hot and cold temperature.Why not more natural ventilation? _ There are several cons or obstacles that come about when utilizing certain types of natural ventilation, which is why Ando might have under-utilized these methods. Noise, pollutants, and harsh winds are a side effect of any kind of ventilation system that passes through a structure at occupant level, which — considering the scale of this project — was unavoidable. Although I think that these system characteristics could in some way support Ando’s thesis regarding bringing the house’s inhabitants closer with nature, cross ventilation in addition to such a large open-air courtyard, would form a setting too abrasive for his clients, especially considering the urban conditions. Furthermore the penetrating sounds, smells, and contents of street’s cross breeze would also undermine his idea of the ―inward looking‖ house.In Conclusion: Would I have the courage to live here?Is Tadao Ando successful in creating a thermally appropriate environment for humans. Well, that’s a difficult question to answer, as it can be interpreted from many of his works and from his own words that hisintention was to make his occupants slightly uncomfortable. Ando has said that walls have often separated us from the outside world in a way that has ―bordered on violent.‖ Through his design it seems he allows light and air to enter into the daily lifestyle of humans in order to disrupt the stale inertia of the modernist lifestyle. As we have discussed in class, humans are historically and genetically outdoor animals, and that our bodies thrive considerably more when we expand our temporal zone of comfort. Ando does exactly that, challenging the widespread momentum towards thermally controlled environments in residential architecture that was simultaneously taking place in America during the 1970’s. I agree with the general principles Ando implies in his design — that we should stop relying on mechanical heating/cooling systems to moderate every environment we occupy, and that a little compromise on our end can go a long way in terms of conserving energy and minimizing waste. On the other hand, I’d also appreciate not having to use an umbrella in my own house. Tadao Ando caught the world’s attention with his extreme manifestation of nature’s intervention in the modern home — and he successfully and succinctly made his point. But if I were to follow his footsteps in my personal practice, I’d most likely prefer a more mode rate approach.。