2019年12月11日托福写作机经
综合写作
独立写作
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
这是一道绝对词题（题干出现the best，the most important
等字眼），反对比较好写，一个实用易学的破解角度是"承合驳绝"，即承认合理性，反驳绝对性。
三个主体段能够这么写，
1.承认合理性（这段也能够合并进开头段）：Visiting museums does have some advantages, i.e. a wide range of carefully selected and beautifully arranged materials；save time and money
2.指出不足：the amount of information in museums is limited and not as lively as when it is presented in real life. Besides, museums usually only provide a singe perspective on major historic events and modern issues.
3.提出更好的 (必要的逻辑环节)：there are better ways to learn about a country like traveling to that country or talking with friends as well as strangers from that country.
另外两种主体段分段能够是
1.承认合理性
2.problem：the amount of information in museums is
limited and not as lively as when it is presented in real
life
solution： there are better ways to learn about a
country like traveling to that country to see it yourself
3.problem： museums usually only provide a singe perspective on major historic events and modern issues.
Solution： talking with friends as well as strangers
from that country provide you additional point of views
一边倒
1.things in the museum do not look as lively as when it
is presented in real life
2.the amount of information in museums is limited and doesn't reflect the diversity of people's interests
3.museums usually only provide a singe perspective on major historic events and modern issues.
如果同意，比较一些其它很好／很重要的方式(必要的逻辑环节)，指出参观博物馆仍是的。
范文
Disagree.
Visiting museums is not the best way to learn about a country.
Boasting of a vast collection and combination of various exhibits, museums are an elegant gesture of human
civilizations. They provide a scene for us to be immersed in
a foreign country without requiring us to step out of our own. To learn best about a country, however, visiting museums can hardly be perceived as a satisfactory way. I would strongly recommend a visit to that country and chat with foreign
friends for the following reasons.
First and foremost, museums are unlikely to give an impression as vivid as a real experience does. The verbal descriptions or picture or videos in the museum, no matter
how expressive they are, cannot relate to visitors as well as a real setting. If you want to know more about Venice, you need to ride a boat, floating over the river between two
arrays of village houses. If you want to know more about Paris, you need to put your feet up to the Eiffel Tower, overlooking the flamboyant colors of that fashion paradise.
If you want to know more about New York, you need to wave
your hands to the mighty woman with a torch in her hands as
if saying "I lift my lamp beside the golden door". None of
this kind of exciting experience can be achieved by playing with a miniature, let alone reading a piece of document or watching a short film.
Additionally, as many exhibits as a museum can collect, they are far from enough to represent what a country is truly like. The problem for museums is that they have limited space, so they have to decide what's important and what's not. Museums typically include that country's ancient artifacts
and documents of major historical events. And in practice,
the judgments of the group of academics that make these decisions don't reflect the great range of interests that people in that country really have. But space is definitely
not an issue if you travel to that country or chat with
