关于SAT思为大家整理了6月SAT考试写作真题

2016年6月13日SAT官方每日一题---写作为了让我们更好的适应sat考试，sat官网每天都会有sat官方每日一题，下面是小编为您整理的2016年6月sat官方每日一题，是关于写作的，让我们一起来看一看这道写作题吧。

In recent years, several urban US airports have converted some of the unused land past their runways to provide habitats for honeybees. While airports may seem unlikely locations for beekeeping, many of them, in fact, have the potential to offer ideal conditions for an apiary (a group of beehives). The Lambert-St. Louis International Airport, for instance, hosts an apiary on a 400-square-foot area of land just north of one of its runways. Dutch clover is a preferred food source for honeybees. This area is rich in Dutch clover. The honeybees may thrive there in part because they aren’t exposed to the agricultural pesticides suspected of contributing to Colony Collapse Disorder. Though unorthodox, airport-based honeybee habitats can help to ensure that local regions have healthy populations of honeybees.Which choice most effectively combines the underlined sentences?A.Dutch clover, a preferred food source for honeybees, is something in which this area is rich.B.This area is rich in Dutch clover, a preferred food source for honeybees.C.Rich in Dutch clover, this area also has a preferred food source for honeybees.D.Dutch clover is a preferred food source for honeybees, and this area is rich in Dutch clover.答案：B解析：Choice B is the best answer because it combines the sentences in a way that creates a logical and smooth progression of information. It continues with the preceding sentence's emphasis on the particular area of land being discussed, mentions that this area is rich in Dutch clover, and then indicates why the presence of Dutch clover is important: it's a preferred food source for honeybees.为了让我们更好的适应sat考试，sat官网每天都会有sat官方每日一题，上面是小编为您整理的2016年6月sat官方每日一题，是关于写作的，让我们一起来看一看这道写作题吧。

SAT思为大家整理了6月SAT考试写作真题关于SAT思为大家整理了6月SAT考试写作真题Prompt 1Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and the assignment below.Most of us are convinced that fame brings happiness. Fame, it seems, is among the things people most desire. We believe that to be famous, for whatever reason, is to prove oneself and confirm that one matters in the world. And yet those who are already famous often complain of the terrible burden of fame. In fact, making the achievement of fame ones life goal involves commitments of time and effort that are usually wasted.Adapted from Leszek Kolakowski, Freedom, Fame, Lying, and Betrayal: Essays on Everyday LifeAssignment:Does fame bring happiness, or are people who are not famous more likely to be happy? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observations.Prompt 2Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and the assignment below.A society composed of men and women who are not bound by conventionin other words, they do not act according to what others say or dois far more lively than one in which all people behave alike. When each persons character is developed individually and differences of opinion are acceptable, it is beneficial to interact with new people because they are not merereplicas of those whom one has already met.。

sat试题及答案SAT试题及答案一、阅读理解（共20题，每题2分，总计40分）1. 根据文章A，作者主要讨论了什么主题？A. 环境保护的重要性B. 科技发展对环境的影响C. 可持续发展的策略D. 气候变化的成因答案：C2. 文章B中提到的“生态足迹”是指什么？A. 人类对自然资源的消耗量B. 人类对环境的污染程度C. 人类对生物多样性的影响D. 人类对气候系统的影响答案：A...20. 文章T中作者对于未来的看法是什么？A. 悲观的B. 乐观的C. 中立的D. 无法确定答案：B二、写作（共1题，总计20分）21. 根据所给材料，写一篇不少于500字的议论文，阐述你对“教育公平”的看法。

答案：略三、数学（共20题，每题2分，总计40分）22. 如果一个圆的半径是5厘米，那么它的面积是多少平方厘米？A. 78.5B. 100C. 157D. 196答案：A23. 一个直角三角形的两条直角边分别是3厘米和4厘米，那么它的斜边是多少厘米？A. 5B. 6C. 7D. 8答案：A...41. 如果一个数列的前三项是2, 4, 6，那么这个数列的第10项是多少？A. 20B. 22C. 24D. 26答案：A四、语法（共20题，每题2分，总计40分）42. 下列句子中，语法正确的是：a) She is one of the student who is going to the concert.b) He has more books than me.c) The children was playing in the park.d) I have been living here for two years.答案：d43. 选择正确的动词形式填空：The teacher _______ (explain/explained) the concept to the students yesterday.答案：explained...61. 选择正确的形容词填空：The _______ (boring/interested) lecture made the audience fell asleep.答案：boring五、词汇（共10题，每题2分，总计20分）62. 选择与“innovative”意思相近的词：A. TraditionalB. ConservativeC. CreativeD. Outdated答案：C63. 选择与“compromise”意思相反的词：A. AgreementB. DisputeC. ConflictD. Resolution答案：C...71. 选择与“meticulous”意思相同的词：A. CarelessB. SloppyC. ThoroughD. Haphazard答案：C请注意：以上内容为示例，实际SAT试题及答案会根据考试的具体内容而有所不同。

2023年SAT考试真题【正文部分】有关2023年SAT考试的真题，我们将提供一些范例问题供您参考。

这些问题旨在帮助您更好地了解SAT考试的题型和难度，但这些问题并非真正的2023年SAT考试题目。

请注意，以下范例问题中的题型和难度可能与实际考试有所不同。

Reading Section (阅读理解部分)范例问题1：Passage 1（以下是一篇关于自然保护的文章）According to the passage, which of the following best describes the ecological impact of deforestation?(A) Increase in soil erosion(B) Decrease in carbon emissions(C) Growth of natural habitats(D) Improvement of air quality范例问题2：Passage 2（以下是一篇关于历史文化的文章）What is the main idea conveyed in this passage?(A) The significance of traditional cuisine in shaping cultural identity(B) The impact of globalization on local food customs(C) The health benefits of adopting a plant-based diet(D) The rise in popularity of fast food chains worldwideWriting and Language Section (写作与语言部分)范例问题1：Choose the option that best replaces the underlined portion of the sentence.The scientist's research is conducted with extreme care, and the results were analyzed meticulously.(A) and the results analyzed meticulously.(B) and the results were meticulously analyzed.(C) and the results have been analyzed meticulously.(D) and the results, being meticulously analyzed.范例问题2：Choose the option that corrects the underlined portion of the sentence.The company's new marketing strategy aims to appeal a broader consumer base.(A) to appeal to a broader consumer base.(B) appealing to a broader consumer base.(C) appeal to a broader consumer base.(D) for appealing a broader consumer base.范例问题1：If f(x) = 2x^2 - 3, what is the value of f(4)?(A) 21(B) 23(C) 25(D) 29范例问题2：The graph of y = 2x + 1 is a straight line that passes through which of the following points?(A) (0, 1)(B) (1, 2)(C) (-1, -1)(D) (2, 5)在SAT考试中，作文题目会根据不同年份的考试有所变化，因此无法提供2023年SAT作文的真正题目。

历年SAT写作真题题目2012年写作题目2012年1月：Should we treat people according to what they are capable of achieving instead of what they actually have done?我们应不应该根据人们所取得的成果来对待他们而不是看他们做了些什么?2012年5月：Do advertisements contribute to people's unhappiness and dissatisfaction?广告会引起人们的不快和不满意吗?2012年6月：Should people respect and tolerate everyone's opinions, or should people take a stand against opinions they consider to be wrong?人们应该尊重和容忍每个人的观点，还是应该有人反对他们认为是错误的观点?2012年10月：Do all people need creativity?是不是所有的人都需要创造力?2012年11月：Are people too serious?是不是现在的人们都太严肃了?2012年12月：Is there really much more for people to invent and discover in the world today?现在是不是真的在世界上还有更多东西等着人们去发明和发现?2013年写作题目2013年1月：Is it necessary for people to imitate others before they can become original and creative?人们真的需要模仿别人之后才能成为原创吗?Is money the most significant factor in determining aperson's quality of life?金钱是决定一个人生活质量的最重要因素吗?Is popular culture the strongest influence on a young person's identity?流行文化对一个年轻人影响的是什么?Should people change their behavior depending on what situation they are in?人们应该根据他们所处的情况来改变自己的行为吗?2013年5月：Is preparing for the future more important than enjoying the present?为未来做准备是不是比享受现在更重要?2013年6月：Do people need to know the source of any information before they use it?人们是否需要在他们使用信息前知道它的来源?2013年10月：Does having too much information about public figures distract us from the important issues?是不是有太多关于公众人物的信息扰乱了我们注重其他重要的事情?2014年写作题目2014年1月：Should we hold on to the old ones when we have certain innovations or just move forward?当我们有了准确的改革方向的时候，我们应该秉持旧的观点还是继续向前迈进?2014年5月：Are people who stay in the same community happier than those who move from one place to another?在同一块区域生活的人是否比移居到别地的人更快乐呢?2014年11月：Should we complain to get what we want?我们是否应该通过抱怨来得到我们想要的?2014年12月：Can people who are not famous be better role model than people who are famous?是不是不出名的人比名人更适合作为榜样?2015年写作题目2015年1月：Can people have too much enthusiasm?人们能不能有太多的热情?Is it courageous to show vulnerability or to show strength?是否有勇气展示自己的弱点或者强项?2015年3月：Can works of art change our lives?艺术能改变我们的生活吗?Will self-discipline take the pleasure of life?自律是否会带走生活的乐趣?2015年6月：Do people need to spend less time to appreciate him or her?人们是否需要花更少的时间去欣赏他人?。

场新s a t写作真题及汇总Have an independent personality. November 2, 20212016年5场新S A T写作真题及范文汇总2016年还剩下12月份的最后一场SAT考试了,这一年是付出也是收获,在最后一场考试来临之前,小编跟大家分享这一年里的前五场新SAT写作考试真题以及一些优秀的写作范文,希望能够给12月份要考试的同学带来参考价值,也希望以后要考SAT的同学们能收藏好好研究;一、2016年3月北美考场3月5日新SAT考试写作文章是出自WashingtonPost华盛顿邮报的一篇文章;此次新SAT 首考的作文题的阅读文章源自E.J. Dionne Jr.于2013年7月3日发表在The Washington Post华盛顿邮报文章名为 A Call for National Service,原文作者大力提倡NationalService;1.文章理解上,本次考试文章主题明确,词汇句型难度正常;2.例证方面,本次考试文章中没有明显的数据或者研究结果类的例证,但是有对于他人的引用等论据;考题原文：写作范文：It is widely acknowledged that a man inpossession of certain unalienablerights will not automatically undertake thecorresponding responsibilities. With an intense sense of social responsibility,American writer E. J. Dionne Jr. proclaims that civil obligations should beimplemented nationwide in his article “ A call for national service” inWashington post. He asserts unavoidable rights must be execrated. Strategies E.J. Dionne Jr. employs to bolster his argument include a personal anecdote, acitation of compelling polls, a quotation from the prestigious Americandocumentation, compare and contrast, paralleled structure and sincere appeal topathos.E.J. Dionne starts his article byillustrating that “ here is the sentence in the Declaration of Independence wealways remember” and “here is the sentence we often forget”, which are theparalleled structures to convey his urgency and attentive concern for the issuethat American citizens should cherish their obligations. Furthermore, hedirectly enumerates that the previous is on rights and the latter obligations.This distinct contrast is utilized to establish an emphasis on his latter pointby highlighting it as a coexisting factor relative to the former mentionedrights in American life. This literal tool serves as a strong technique to drawthe audience into the issue addressed in the wiring.By citing a quotation from “the Declarationof Independence” the author successfully establishes an authoritative image inthe readers’ heart that he is knowledgeable and thoughtfu l. E.J. Dionne’spresentation of a numerical statistics based on the accurate “237” year and agerange “18 and 28” strengthens his weight to his claim. Moreover, the authordemonstrates a personal anecdote that “last week, the Aspen Institute gathereda politi cally diverse group of Americans…to declare a commitment to give a yearof service to the country”, which provides a baseline for readers to findcredence andcredibility with the author’s argument. This anecdote instantlyconnects the author and readers closely which leads to a spiritual resonance.Dionne Jr. reasons that not only Americanscould enjoy their rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness freely butalso should assume their obligations on the solemn pledge of lives, fortunes andsacred honor. “There are no quick fixes to our sense of disconnection, butthere may be a way to restore our sense.” He first raises a precaution in thereaders’ heart then offers a sound solution to show the stringent andwell-organized thinking pattern. Subsequently, the author exemplifies anoccurrence last week, the precise time flow line, to underline the viewpointthat“ we do, indeed, owe something to our country and we owe an enormousdebt”.Dionne utilizes specific diction to enhancehis argument to convince his reader s. He employs personal pronoun such as “ we”for the aim to intrigue his personnel involvement as part of this calling whichfortifies his persuasion as well as consolidates his credibility in thepreachment. Through the careful word selection, Dionne enhances his propositionby ascribing the liability as a fundamental issue. This augments for thepersuasion of his readers by informing them that this is a significant issuethat all people should be aware of and take heed to.Following the calling, the author lists thesolutions and the challenges in the final parts of the article. He makes anefficient use of rhetorical question to challenge his readers to ponder that “who knows whether the universal exception of service would change the countryas much as Mc Chrystal hopes.” By raising this question, Dionne draws outprofound comprehension on the proposal. “It’s based on the belief that certainunalienable rights entail certain unavoidable responsibilities”-----the authorinspires his readers to feel responsible for the fate of America’s future. Thisstrategyis obviously an appeal to pathos, calling the readers to actresolutely and adding the emotionally-infused spur to the American citizens.Overall, E. J. Dionne Jr. provides a coherentand strong logical argument that all Americans should enjoy the unalienablerights that have been prescribed in “the Declaration of Independence”andshoulder the obligations cross thelines of class, race, background, politics,ideology as well. He takes full advantages of a personal anecdote, compellingpolls, an authoritative quotation, compare and contrast, paralleled structureand heart-felt appeal to emotions to thoroughly illustrate his steadfastcalling for national service.二、5月7日亚太新SAT考试5月份亚太地区的新SAT写作阅读文章选自2009年发表在VanityFair上的由Christopher Hitchens写的一片社论文章——The Lovely Stones,讲的是希腊古雕塑本身艺术价值极高,历史上被破坏和贱卖给英国,作者主张应该还给希腊;1. 难度高于OG的文章和2016年3月北美的文章,主要是因为涉及较多历史、雕塑等专业词汇,许多考生可能阅读要花较多时间阅读且理解难度大；2. 主要的论证手法与OG范文公布的基本范围一致,首段就出现引用名人名言,第三段主要用数据和历史事实,这两个出现概率和比重很大,之后主要用了类比;其中类比在OG范文中没有直接出现,备考中容易被忽略,建议后续备考延伸修辞手法;3. 作文部分时间50分钟,非常紧张,主要是阅读专业单词多,理解难度大,大部分考生都没有写完完整的两面答题纸有四面;考题原文：The Lovely StonesChristopher HitchensP1 The great classicist A. W. Lawrence once remarked of the Parthenon that it is “the one building in the world which may be assessed as absolutelyright.”P2 Not that the beauty and symmetry of the Parthenon have not been abused and perverted and mutilated. Five centuries after the birth of Christianity the Parthenon was closed and desolated. It was then “converted” into aChristian church. Turkish forces also used it for centuries as a garrison and an arsenal, with the tragic result that in 1687, when Christian Veniceattacked the Ottoman Turks, a powder magazine was detonated and huge damage inflicted on the structure. Most horrible of all, perhaps, the Acropolis was made to fly a Nazi flag during the German occupation of Athens.P3 The damage done by the ages to the building, and by past empires and occupations, cannot all be put right. But there is one desecration and dilapidation that can at least be partially undone. Early in the 19th century, Britain’s ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, Lord Elgin, sent a wrecking crew to the Turkish-occupied territory of Greece, where it sawed off approximately half of the adornment of the Parthenon and carried it away. As with allthings Greek, there were three elements to this, the most lavish andbeautiful sculptural treasury in human history. Under the direction of the artistic genius Phidias, the temple had two massive pediments decorated with the figures of Pallas Athena, Poseidon, and the gods of the sun and the moon. It then had a series of 92 high-relief panels, or metopes, depicting a succession of mythical and historical battles. The most intricate element was the frieze, carved in bas-relief, which showed the gods, humans, and animals that made up the annual Pan-Athens procession: there were 192 equestrian warriors and auxiliaries featured, which happens to be the exact number ofthe city’s heroes who fell at the Battle of Marathon. Experts differ on precisely what story is being told here, but the frieze was quite clearly carved as a continuous narrative. Except that half the cast of the tale isstill in Bloomsbury, in London, having been sold well below cost by Elgin to the British government in 1816 for $2.2 million in today’s currency to payoff his many debts.P4 now, there has been a bitter argument about the legitimacy of the British Museum’s deal. I’ve written a whole book about this controversy and won’t oppress you with all the details, but would just make this one point. If the Mona Lisa had been sawed in two during the Napoleonic Wars and the separated halves had been acquired by different museums in, say, St. Petersburg and Lisbon, would there not be a general wish to see what they might look like if re-united If you think my analogy is overdrawn, consider this: the body ofthe goddess Iris is at present in London, while her head is in Athens. Thefront part of the torso of Poseidon is in London, and the rear part is in Athens. And so on. This is grotesque.P5 It is unfortunately true that the city allowed itself to become very dirty and polluted in the 20th century, and as a result the remaining sculpturesand statues on the Parthenon were nastily eroded by “acid rain.” But gradually and now impressively, the Greeks have been living up to their responsibilities. Beginning in 1992, the endangered marbles were removed from the temple, given careful cleaning with ultraviolet and infra-red lasers, and placed in a climate-controlled interior.P6 About a thousand feet southeast of the temple, the astonishing newAcropolis Museum will open on June 20. With 10 times the space of the old repository, it will be able to display all the marvels that go with the temples on top of the hill. Most important, it will be able to show, for the first time in centuries, how the Parthenon sculptures looked to the citizensof old.P7 The British may continue in their constipated fashion to cling to what they have so crudely amputated, but the other museums and galleries of Europe have seen the artistic point of re-unification and restored to Athens whatwas looted in the years when Greece was defenseless. The Acropolis Museum has hit on the happy idea of exhibiting, for as long as following that precedentis too much to hope for, its own original sculptures with the London-held pieces represented by beautifully copied casts. And it creates a naturalthirst to see the actual re-assembly completed. So, far from emptying or weakening a museum, this controversy has instead created another one, whichis destined to be among Europe’s finest galleries. And one day, surely,there will be an agreement to do the right thing by the world’s most“right” structure.写作范文：Sculptures, bestowed with native people’swisdom, practice and cultural stamp, should be preserved in appropriate placesso as to maintain their integrity.In the article “The Lovely Stones”editorialforConde Nast Digital,Christopher Hitchens argues that the sculptures of theParthenon should be returned to its origin, Greece. By the end of this piece,readers will find themselves nodding in agreement with what the Hitchens has tosay. Hitchens utilizes contrast, historical event, analogy and appeal toemotion to pleadwith the readers to take his side.In order to expose the people’smaltreatment toward the Parthenon, Hitchens starts his article off by employinga sharp contrast. Hitchens first quotes A. W. Lawrence’s remark of theParthenon, “it is the one building in the world which may be assessed asabsolutely right.” Quoting words of praise from an authoritative figureenhances Hitchens’s intention to depict the beauty and glamor of the Parthenon,lending more credibility to his argument. Later, inthe second paragraph,Hitchens points out that the beauty and glamor did not deter people’s abuse,destruction and mutilation. To demonstrate this,Hitchens illustrates theParthenon has been misused as garrison, arsenal andso on. By juxtaposing thefabulous beauty to the destruction of the Parthenon, Hitchens unfolds the harshfact that the significance of the Parthenon has been ignored. This contrastserves as a vehicle to highlight the irony and gravity of people’s maltreatmenttow ard the Parthenon, drawing the readersinto the issue addressed by thewriting.Hitchens strengthens his argument with theportrayal of historical event. In the third paragraph, Hitchens demonstratesthat some parts of the Parthenon were occupied by the British people in the19th century. To present the exquisite sculpture comprehensively, Hitchensfirst notes that three elements of the Parthenon contribute to its outstandingposition in human history —two massive pediments, a series of 92 high-reliefpanels and frieze. Furthermore, the use of detailed image and statistics leadsreaders to imagine the wonder of the Parthenon. However, such wonder has beendestroyed as parts of the sculpture have been carried away and preserved inBritish government. With the help of historical events, Hitchens successfullyenhances the credibility and legitimacy of his claim, creating a compellingappeal to ethos. In addition, the utilization of analogyfurthers Hitchens’ argument that the sculpture of the Parthenon should not bepreserved by different museums. Hitchens adopts several classic forms of artsto highlights the significanceof the integrity of art. Hitchens notes that “Ifthe Mona Lisa had been sawed in two during the Napoleonic Wars and theseparated halves had been acquiredby different museums in, say, St. Petersburgand Lisbon, would there not be a general wish to see what they might look like ifre-united”. Similarly, Hitchens compares the destroyed Parthenon to thegoddess Iris as well as the torso of Poseidon. As the assumptio ns of divided“Mona Lisa” , “goddess Iris” and “the torso of Poseidon” are grotesque, theseparate parts of the Parthenon are also ridiculous. Therefore, the analogyadds more power to Hitchens’ s claim that the integrity of the Parthenon shouldbe preserved i n Greece.Finally, Hitchens appeals to readers’emotion. Hitchens indicates that although the city did not attach muchimportance upon the protection of the Parthenon in the past, “the Greeks havebeen living up to their responsibilities”. Harboring a positiv e attitude, theAcropolis Museum tries to exhibit the integrity of the Parthenon. This practicesurely motivates readers’ longing to witness the marvel of the integralParthenon. At the end of the passage, the readers will definitely agree withHitchens’s clai m that the sculpture of the Parthenon should be returned to itsoriginal land. Thisis a strategy of appeal to pathos, forcing the readers toface an emotionally- charged inquiry that will spur some kind of response.In conclusion, contrast, historical events,analogy and appeal to emotion, all contribute to an exceptionally well-writtenargument. It is his utilization of these practices and more that make thisarticle worthy of recognition.三、2016年6月4日亚太新SAT考试本次考试作文A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban来自美国新闻网opinion版块2014年1月23日发表的一篇文章;作者认为通过对碳排放收税是比禁止一些类型的真空吸尘器的使用更好的策略;这次写作题目的难度大大降低,远远低于5月的the lovely stone,甚至低于3月北美的真题a call for national service；文章的主题, 写作风格以及论证手法都非常像og的第二篇范文plastic bag ban；文章比较简单的主要原因是主题浅显易懂,而且文章用词比较简单;考题原文：A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum BanBy SitaSlavovP1 Starting in September, the European Union will ban vacuum cleaners using more than 1,600 watts of power, with the limit slated to be lowered to 900 watts by 2017. This ban won't just affect a handful of the worst offenders. According to the European Commission, the average vacuum cleaner sold today uses 1,800 watts.P2 Intended largely to reduce carbon emissions, the vacuum cleaner ban joins numerous other regulations throughout the world that severely restrict consumers' choices. Want an incandescent light bulb Too bad – they're banned. How about a gas guzzling car Sorry – they're being squeezed out by tighterfuel economy standards.P3 Rules like these rub many people the wrong way because they represent government intrusion into even the most minute of personal decisions. Do we really want the government telling us what kind of vacuum cleaner or lightbulb to buy Don't policy makers have better things to think about Backers of such regulations counter that, when people buy powerful vacuum cleaners and incandescent bulbs, they don't take into account the spillover costs they impose on others by contributing to climate change.P4 Fortunately, there's a better solution. A carbon tax – set to reflect the spillover costs of carbon emissions – would eliminate the need to micromanage the kinds of vacuum cleaners and light bulbs that people can buy. Instead, the tax would provide consumers with an incentive to act in asocially responsible manner by ensuring that those who operate such products pick up the tab for the climate harm they cause.P5 The main advantage of the carbon tax is that it leaves consumers free to decide whether to buy energy-efficient vacuum cleaners and light bulbs or whether to reduce their carbon footprint in other ways. That's a big improvement over the regulatory approach because individual consumers are ina better position than government bureaucrats to figure out the least painful way to reduce their contribution to climate change.P6 A carbon tax is also better targeted than vacuum cleaner bans and other regulations. Some critics of the EU's new rule claim that consumers will need to run their less powerful vacuum cleaners for longer periods of time to achieve their desired level of cleanliness, which might actually increase the amount of electricity they use. Similarly, improving fuel economy through tighter standards may increase the amount of driving that people do. These"rebound effects" might not be big enough to actually cause a net increase in emissions, but they still reduce the effectiveness of the regulations.P7 A carbon tax avoids these problems by directly targeting the real culprit– carbon. Under a carbon tax, there's an incentive to cut back on carbon emissions along every dimension. In other words, because tax payments are in line with actual emissions, a Prius owner who drives a lot could very wellpay more than an SUV owner who hardly ever drives.P8 Economists of all political stripes agree on these points. In a 2011 pollof leading academic economists representing a variety of demographic backgrounds and political views, 90 percent agreed with the statement: "A tax on the carbon content of fuels would be a less expensive way to reducecarbon-dioxide emissions than would a collection of policies such as'corporate average fuel economy' requirements for automobiles." There's no doubt that economic advisers offer similar advice when policy makers consider regulations like the vacuum cleaner ban. Unfortunately, these misguidedpolicies often turn out to be more politically feasible than a carbon tax.P9 That may change going forward, however. As policy makers look to trim budgets and find additional sources of revenue, a carbon tax could representa good compromise between conservatives and liberals – a way to address climate change while protecting consumer freedom and raising revenue that can be used to lower other taxes.写作范文：In an effort to fight off negative impactsof carbon emissions on the environment, the EU has decided to impose a strictban on vacuum cleanersusing more than 1,600 watts of power. Is this the rightaction to take Obviously, SitaSlavov, a US News contributor, does not side withthe decisionin her article A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban, in which sheclaims that a carbon tax would work as a better solution than the ban. Sheemploys logical reasoning and mainly rhetorical questioning to sway the readersinto her side. Logical reasoning serves as the mostpowerful strategy utilized to present reasons against the vacuum ban and forthe tax. Stating the carbon tax as a better solution, Slavov starts her claimoff with the reason – the tax is“set to reflect the spillover costs of carbonemissions.” This reasonclearly addresses the vacuum ban backers’ claim thatthose who “buy powerful vacuum cleaners and incandescent bulbs” do not considertheir spillover costs, so the readers would begin to deem the tax as at leastone of the alternatives to the ban. What would persuade the audience to believethat the tax is abetter option is the author’s next argument: it givescustomers free choice.In a democratic country, no one would like to be told orforced by“government bureaucrats” to do their business, even a small decisionlike buying energy-efficient vacuum cleaners and light bulbs. Anotherargument,the tax targeting directly at the real culprit – carbon, would enablethe readers to realize that the ban might have a major defect: the“reboundeffects”could decrease its effectiveness. Having realized the point, theaudience would be more reluctant to support the ban. The final statementmadeby the author to bolster her claim would function as the last straw to breakthe back of the ban. In the statement, Slavov mentions that “economists of allpolitical stripes” agree with her points, citing a 2011 poll to add soundnessof her claim. Those ready to take her side would feel that they are not alone,backed up by all these professionals. By repeatedly pointing out theincredibility of the ban proponents’ reasons and the drawbacks of the ban, theauthor establishes and strengthens solidarity and authenticity of her claimthat the tax is a better choice.Logical reasoning aside, rhetorical questioningis flexibly employed to playto the readers’ emotion. The two rhetoricalquestions, “Want an incandescent light bulb” and “How about a gas guzzlingcar”, demonstrate how the government rudely intrudes people’s daily life andmakes decisions for them. This would arouse the readers’ distaste, as it isridiculous that someoneelse rather than oneself could meddle in one’s ownaffairs. Therefor e, they would definitely say no to the next question, “Do wereally want the government telling us what kind of vacuum cleaner or lightbulbto buy”. When reading the subsequent question, “Don't policy makers havebetter things to think about”, they would begi n to ponder upon whether therewould be a“better thing” than the government’s manipulation of their life viabansand regulations. This rhetorical device, clearly a strategy of appealingto emotions, makes it much easier for the audience to embrace theautho r’ssolution—a carbon tax—proposed immediately afterwards.All in all, logical reasoning and rhetoricalquestions strongly champion the author’s claim that a carbon tax performs muchbetter than a compulsory banon vacuum cleaners. Persuaded by her article, thereaders would choose the former, a less political option, the next time theyneed to address “climate change while protecting consumer freedom and raisingrevenue that can be usedto lower other taxes.”四、2016年10月亚洲考场本次写作考题选自纽约时报的文章Read, kids, read,作者 Frank Bruni,全文共15段,作者论点是 Reading must remain a valued activity.真题原文：1、As an uncle I’m inconsistent about too many things.2、Birthdays, for example. My nephew Mark had one on Sunday, and I didn’t remember — and send a text — until 10 p.m., by which point he was asleep.3、But about books, I’m steady. Relentless. I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more.I’m reliably hurling novels at them, and also at friends’ kids. I may wellbe responsible for 10 percent of all sales of “The Fault in Our Stars,” a teenage love story to be released as a movie next month. Never have I spent money with fewer regrets, because I believe in reading — not just in its power to transport but in its power to transform.4、So I was crestfallen on Monday, when a new report by Common Sense Media came out. It showed that 30 years ago, only 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds said that they “hardly ever” or never read forpleasure. Today, 22 percent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of 17-year-oldssay that. Fewer than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for pleasure“almost every day.” Back in 1984, 31 percent did. What a marked and depressing change.5、I know, I know: This sounds like a fogy’s crotchety lament. Or, worse,like self-interest. Professional writers arguing for vigorous reading are dinosaurs begging for a last breath. We’re panhandlers with a better vocabulary.6、But I’m coming at this differently, as someone persuaded that readingdoes things — to the brain, heart and spirit — that movies, television,video games and the rest of it cannot.7、There’s research on this, and it’s cited in a recent article in The Guardian by Dan Hurley, who wrote that after “three years interviewing psychologists and neur oscientists around the world,” he’d concluded that “reading and intelligence have a relationship so close as to be symbiotic.”8、In terms of smarts and success, is reading causative or merely correlated Which comes first, “The Hardy Boys” or the hardy mind That’s difficult to unravel, but several studies have suggested that people who read fiction, reveling in its analysis of character and motivation, are more adept atreading people, too: at sizing up the social whirl around them. They’re more empathetic. God knows we need that.9、Late last year, neuroscientists at Emory University reported enhancedneural activity in people who’d been given a regular course of daily reading, which seemed to jog the brain: to raise its game, if you will.10、Some experts hav e doubts about that experiment’s methodology, but I’m struck by how its findings track something that my friends and I often discuss. If we spend our last hours or minutes of the night reading ratherthan watching television, we wake the next morning with thoughts less jumbled, moods less jangled. Reading has bequeathed what meditation promises. It has smoothed and focused us.11、Maybe that’s about the quiet of reading, the pace of it. At Success Academy Charter Schools in New York City, whose students significantly outperform most peers statewide, the youngest kids all learn and play chess,in part because it hones “the ability to focus and concentrate,” said Sean O’Hanlon, who supervises the program. Doesn’t reading do the same12、Daniel Willingham, a psychology professor at the University of Virginia, framed it as a potentially crucial corrective to the rapid metabolism and sensory overload of digital technology. He told me that it can demonstrate to kids that there’s payoff in “doing something taxing, in delayed gratification.” A new book of his, “Raising Kids Who Read,” will be published later this year.13、Before talking with him, I arranged a conference call with David Levithan and Amanda Maciel. Both have written fiction in the young adult genre, whose current robustness is cause to rejoice, and they rightly noted that the intensity of the connection that a person feels to a favorite novel, withwhich he or she spends eight or 10 or 20 hours, is unlike any response to a movie.14、That observation br ought to mind a moment in “The Fault in Our Stars” when one of the protagonists says that sometimes, “You read a book and itfills you with this weird evangelical zeal, and you become convinced that the shattered world will never be put back together unless and until all living humans read the book.”15、Books are personal, passionate. They stir emotions and spark thoughts ina manner all their own, and I’m convinced that the shattered world has less hope for repair if reading becomes an ever smaller part of it.写作范文：The vicissitude of history never fails to amaze us with all the changes ithas brought to human life. If we trace back to see what has been changedsince human civilization, seldom can we see anything that remains intact,with only one exception- the importance of reading. Despite the fact that reading has never dropped from our top priorities, few people keep the habitof it. As a reaction to such pathetic phenomenon, writer Frank Bruni draws people’s attention back to reading and encourages p eople to value it. Strategies he employs include contrast, credible reference and tacticreasoning that appeal to people’s emotion and agreement.One impressive feature of this article is Bruni’s contrast at the very beginning to introduce his topic, with the next paragraphs addressing its benefits. He compares things that he always ignores such as nephew’sbirthday and niece’s school production with things he never fails tooverlook -reading. For the majority of people, especially teenagers, birthday party and school performance are events that family members should remember. Unfortunately, this is not the case for the author. Reading at this point, readers are left a bit disappointed at the author and tend to pay moreattention to what he wants to convey n ext. At the cusp of people’s attention, author Bruni brings about something that deserves greater emphasis- reading: “I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more.” Thus the readers start to realize howjustifiable the author is-as nothing like a birthday party or a performancein school is comparable with the importance of reading. With the utilizationof this contrast, the author successfully draws the attention from thereaders and lays a solid foundation for his later argument.Aside from this, the author’s careful choice of evidence adds credibility to the article. He cites properly a report by Common Sense Media, claiming that three is a sharp decline in the percentage of teenagers read for fun “few er than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for pleasure”. At the same time, however, the number of the young who hardly ever read or never read for pleasure elevates from “only 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds” 30 years ago to “22 p ercent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of17-year-olds “ today. This worrisome report indicates that the young nolonger read as much as they used to. Linked with the previous paragraphs, the。

6月SAT考试作文题目提示If you took the June xx SAT Reasoning Test, you would have been given one of the essay prompts below:Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and the assignment below.We measure our progress as a civilization by what we see as advances in technology, which seem more significant than such concerns as education and the condition of the natural world. Still, I would prefer to be a part of a munity that judged itself on the happiness of its members rather than on the development of new technology.Adapted from Thomas MooreAssignment:Does a strong mitment to technological progress cause a society to neglect other values, such as education and the protection of the environment? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observations.Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and the assignment below.People are often told to obey the rules. In reality, these rules are not permanent: what is right at a given point in time may be declared wrong at another time and vice versa. The world changes so rapidly that rules areout-of-date almost as soon as they are created. People cannot rely on established guidelines to determine what they should and should not do.。

sat考试题及答案SAT考试题及答案1. 阅读部分阅读部分包含52个问题，分为5篇文章，每篇文章后附有若干个问题。

以下是一篇示例文章及相关问题。

文章摘要：本文讨论了城市化对环境的影响，特别是城市扩张对野生动物栖息地的破坏。

问题1：作者提到城市化的主要目的是什么？A. 提高城市居民的生活质量B. 增加城市的经济收入C. 减少对自然环境的破坏D. 保护野生动物的栖息地正确答案：A问题2：根据文章，城市扩张对野生动物栖息地的影响是什么？A. 栖息地面积增加B. 栖息地面积减少C. 栖息地质量提高D. 栖息地质量下降正确答案：B2. 写作和语言部分写作和语言部分包含44个问题，要求考生修改句子、段落和整个文章，以提高语言的准确性和表达的清晰度。

问题3：以下句子中，哪个选项是语法正确的？A. She is one of the most talented singers who has ever performed.B. She is one of the most talented singers who have ever performed.C. She is one of the most talented singers who had ever performed.D. She is one of the most talented singers who has ever performed.正确答案：B问题4：以下哪个选项最适合填入空白处，以使段落连贯？原文："The new policy aims to reduce traffic congestion by encouraging people to use public transportation."A. However, many people still prefer driving their own cars.B. Therefore, the policy has been successful in reducing traffic.C. As a result, the number of cars on the road has decreased.D. Despite this, traffic congestion remains a problem.正确答案：A3. 数学部分数学部分包含58个问题，分为两个部分：无需计算器部分和需计算器部分。

2023年SAT英语写作真题解析2023年的SAT英语写作题目意在引发考生对于教育体制和评估方法的思考。

本文将对这道题目进行全面解析，以便考生更好地理解并应对类似题目。

在本题中，考生需要根据提供的2023年SAT英语写作真题，进行分析和解答。

下面将按照一般的学术文章写作格式，分为引言、主体和结论三部分进行阐述。

引言：2023年的SAT英语写作真题引导考生探讨当前的教育体制和评估方法。

教育一直是一个备受关注和争议的话题，人们对于如何更好地评估学生能力和表现提出了各种观点。

对此，本文将通过对2023年SAT英语写作真题的解析，探讨这个问题的复杂性，并提供一些思考和建议。

主体：1. 题目分析2023年SAT英语写作真题要求考生讨论新的评估方法是否能更准确地评判学生的能力和潜力。

这是一个较为开放的问题，考生可以从不同角度进行分析和解答。

在接下来的段落中，将提供一些论据和观点以辅助考生思考。

2. 多元评估方法的重要性传统的考试评估主要侧重于学生的记忆和应试能力，而新的评估方法致力于全面评价学生的各方面能力，例如创造力、批判性思维和解决问题的能力。

这种综合评估能更准确地反映学生真正的能力水平。

3. 评估方法可能的局限性尽管多元评估方法有其优点，但也存在一些挑战和风险。

例如，某些领域的能力难以量化评估，而且评估方法的标准化可能会带来一定程度的主观性和局限性。

4. 平衡与综合评估既然传统的考试评估和新的多元评估都存在局限性，那么在评估学生能力和潜力时，可以将它们结合起来，形成一个更全面的评估方法。

这种平衡与综合评估能更准确地反映学生的实际水平。

结论：本文通过对2023年SAT英语写作真题的分析，提供了对教育评估方法的思考和建议。

多元评估方法的引入可以更好地评估学生的能力和潜力，然而，我们也应该认识到评估方法的局限性。

因此，在评估学生时，应该采用平衡与综合的方法，以便更准确地了解学生的真实水平。

通过以上的文章结构和内容展开，考生可以有效地回答2023年SAT英语写作真题，并提供合理的观点和论据。

2023年SAT英语写作真题As an AI language model, I can provide you with a 1000-word essay for the 2023 SAT English Writing Exam. However, it's important to note that I cannot accurately predict future SAT essay topics. Nevertheless, I will provide you with a sample essay that can help you prepare for the exam. Please keep in mind that this essay may not directly correspond to the actual 2023 SAT essay prompt.Essay:Introduction:In recent years, technology has revolutionized various aspects of our lives, leading to significant advancements and fundamental changes. As we step into 2023, the impact of technology on society seems boundless. In this essay, we will explore the multifaceted influence of technology on education, communication, and employment.Education Transformation:One area where technology has made a profound impact is education. Traditional classrooms are gradually being replaced by virtual learning environments. With the advent of online courses and interactive learning platforms, students can access educational materials anytime, anywhere. Furthermore, technology enables personalized learning, as adaptive algorithms can cater to students' individual strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, education has become more accessible and tailored to each student's needs, fostering a more inclusive and efficient learning experience.Communication Evolution:The way we communicate has evolved significantly due to technological advancements. Social media platforms have emerged as a powerful tool for networking, information sharing, and collective action. Through instant messaging apps, distance is no longer a barrier to maintaining real-time connections with friends and family. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential drawbacks, such as increased screen time and the risk of online privacy breaches. Striking a balance between virtual and face-to-face interactions becomes vital to ensure a healthy social life.Impact on Employment:As technology continues to progress, so does the nature of work. Automation and artificial intelligence are transforming industries, leading to job displacement and the emergence of new employment opportunities. Routine and repetitive tasks can be automated, enabling workers to focus on more complex and creative endeavors. Adaptability and continuous learning become essential for individuals to thrive in an increasingly tech-driven job market. Moreover, technology has made remote work more feasible, allowing flexible schedules and work-life balance.Challenges and Ethical Considerations:While the benefits of technology are evident, it is crucial to address the challenges and ethical considerations that arise. The digital divide widens the gap between those who have access to technology and those who don't, hindering equal opportunities. Privacy concerns, cybersecurity threats, and the misuse of personal data necessitate rigorous regulations and ethical considerations. Additionally, the rise of automation poses questionsregarding job security, income inequality, and the potential loss of human touch in various industries.Conclusion:In conclusion, the impact of technology in 2023 is significant across various aspects of our lives. Education has become more accessible and customized, communication has evolved to include virtual connectivity, and the labor market has witnessed transformations. However, while embracing the advantages of technology, we must also navigate the challenges it presents. Striking a balance between progress and human-centered values is essential in harnessing the full potential of technology for the betterment of society.Please note that the above essay sample is a general response to the topic "2023年SAT英语写作真题" and may not directly correspond to the actual exam prompt.。

SAT6写作真题满分范文Assignment:Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and the assignment below.It is often the case that revealing the complete truth may bring trouble—discomfort, embarrassment, sadness, or even harm—to oneself or to another person. In these circumstances, it is better not to express our real thoughts and feelings. Whether or not we should tell the truth, therefore, depends on the circumstances.Assignment: Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observations.Sample EssayEven though it is true that honesty is a great virtue, I still cannot help but believe that under some circumstances, choosing not to tell the truth is a wise decision. Look at O. Henry’s short story, “the last leaf.” Johnsy suffers from pneumonia, a severe disease that can result in the death of a person. Johnsy sinks into the depths of hopelessness. Seeing the leaves of ivy outside her window fall down every day, she tells Sue, her best friend, that she must go when the last leaf falls. Fearing that Johnsy’s hold upon the world grows weaker, Sue goes to see Mr.Behrman, an old painter. Knowing the matter, Mr. Behrman comes up with a good idea of drawing a leaf on the tree outside Johnsy’s window. An artificial leaf will never fall down. When Johnsy sees the last leaf still stands out after the heavy rain and fierce wind, she has the courage to fight with pneumonia. Finally she recovers. In this story, Sue knows the truth but does not tell Johnsy about the artificial leaf because she believes Johnsy can pluck up at the critical time.In the movie, le s miserable, the bishop’s action also demonstrates that people should not always tell the truth. In 1815, convict Jean V aljean is released on parole after serving a nineteen-year sentence. Valjean is driven out of every town, because of his paroled status. Fortunately, later he is offered food and shelter by the Bishop of Digne. However, during the night, Valjean steals silver when the Bishop sleeps soundly. The next day, he is captured by the authorities, but the Bishop informs them that the silver was given to Valjean as a gift, then gives him even more, securing that Valjean be released. Moved by the Bishop's grace, Valjean breaks hisparole, vowing to start an honest life helping others under a new identity and here ally performs his vow from then on. Had the Bishop told the truth, Valjean would have been arrested and sent to prison, which would definitely ruin a person.Another example that could be used to justify that circumstances determine wether people should tell the truth or not is a story by Kathryn Forbes. The narrator actually lives in an impoverished family. One day she is filled with fear when she knows that Jensens in her neighborhood are put out because they cannot pay the rent. She fears that the same thing will happen to her family. But her sister reminds her that they have a bank account. Thinking that their mother always tells them that they have a bank account downtown, the narrator feels a sense of relief. Every time when the family needs money, children will volunteer to do some part-time jobs and Papa will give up tobacco. Children do not want to withdraw money from the bank because they feel that with Mama’s bank account they can live without fear. When then arrator grows up and gets her first check and asks Mama to put it in the bank account, Mama says they do not actually possess a bank account. In this story, Mama lies to her children about the bank account when time is difficult because she does not want to make her children worry and she knows that it is not good for little ones to be afraid, to not feel secure. When children grow up and have ability to earn enough money, Mama chooses to tell them the truth.Examples from O. Henry’s story, the last leaf, the behavior of the kind Bishop and Mama’s white lie can illustrate that if we want the world to move in the right direction we must understand that in some situations we should not tell the complete truth.。

6月香港SAT考试已经落下帷幕。

以下是写作部分考情回忆和分析。

本文分为三部分：一、作文部分原文，二、文章分析，三、写作思路分析。

一、2016年6月香港SAT考试作文题原文A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum BanBy Sita SlavovP1 Starting in September, the European Union will ban vacuum cleaners using more than 1,600 watts of power, with the limit slated to be lowered to 900 watts by 2017. This ban won't just affect a handful of the worst offenders. According to the European Commission, the average vacuum cleaner sold today uses 1,800 watts.P2 Intended largely to reduce carbon emissions, the vacuum cleaner ban joins numerous other regulations throughout the world that severely restrict consumers' choices. Want an incandescent light bulb? Too bad –they're banned. How about a gas guzzling car? Sorry – they're being squeezed out by tighter fuel economy standards.P3 Rules like these rub many people the wrong way because they represent government intrusion into even the most minute of personal decisions. Do we really want the government telling us what kind of vacuum cleaner or lightbulb to buy? Don't policy makers have better things to think about? Backers of such regulations counter that, when people buy powerful vacuum cleaners and incandescent bulbs, they don't take into account the spillover costs they impose on others by contributing to climate change.P4 Fortunately, there's a better solution. A carbon tax –set to reflect the spillover costs of carbon emissions – would eliminate the need to micromanage the kinds of vacuum cleaners and light bulbs that people can buy. Instead, the tax would provide consumers with an incentive to act in a socially responsible manner by ensuring that those who operate such products pick up the tab for the climate harm they cause.P5 The main advantage of the carbon tax is that it leaves consumers free to decide whether to buy energy-efficient vacuum cleaners and light bulbs or whether to reduce their carbon footprint in other ways. That's a big improvement over the regulatory approach because individual consumers are in a better position than government bureaucrats to figure out the least painful way to reduce their contribution to climate change.P6 A carbon tax is also better targeted than vacuum cleaner bans and other regulations. Some critics of the EU's new rule claim that consumers will need to run their less powerful vacuum cleaners for longer periods of time to achievetheir desired level of cleanliness, which might actually increase the amount of electricity they use. Similarly, improving fuel economy through tighter standards may increase the amount of driving that people do. These "rebound effects" might not be big enough to actually cause a net increase in emissions, but they still reduce the effectiveness of the regulations.P7 A carbon tax avoids these problems by directly targeting the real culprit –carbon. Under a carbon tax, there's an incentive to cut back on carbon emissions along every dimension. In other words, because tax payments are in line with actual emissions, a Prius owner who drives a lot could very well pay more than an SUV owner who hardly ever drives.P8 Economists of all political stripes agree on these points. In a 2011 poll of leading academic economists representing a variety of demographic backgrounds and political views, 90 percent agreed with the statement: "A tax on the carbon content of fuels would be a less expensive way to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions than would a collection of policies such as 'corporate average fuel economy' requirements for automobiles." There's no doubt that economic advisers offer similar advice when policy makers consider regulations like the vacuum cleaner ban. Unfortunately, these misguided policies often turn out to be more politically feasible than a carbon tax.P9 That may change going forward, however. As policy makers look to trim budgets and find additional sources of revenue, a carbon tax could represent a good compromise between conservatives and liberals –a way to address climate change while protecting consumer freedom and raising revenue that can be used to lower other taxes.二、文章分析本文选自A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban，作者Sita Slavov，文章主题是政府应该设立碳税（carbon tax）。

6月SAT英语写作真题分析
20XX年6月7日SAT(美国高考)作文题目(亚洲)
Are people who stay in the same community happier than those who move from one place to another?
据悉：20XX年6月7日SAT作文话题变了?阅读出现新题型?本次考试对于10月SAT有没有暗示?
20XX年6月7日SAT考试亚太区写作essay题目点评
今天SAT亚太区考试的essay写作题目是：“are living in single community rather than shifting conrtibuting to happiness"(根据何同学回忆)，大概意思是问”一个人是在“单一”社区生活”快乐“还是不断改变所生活的社区”快乐“?
很多同学看到这个题目觉得”简单“，有的同学觉得”奇怪“，觉得简单的同学是根据字面内容判断，觉得”简单“，觉得”奇怪“的`同学是因为感觉和之前练习的SAT写作题目不一样。

其实，这个题目不简单，也不奇怪。

觉得简单的同学在分析题目时”方向“不对，这个SAT写作题目不是让我们去讨论”单一“ VS ”变化“，而是要讨论”个人“和”社区，社会“的关系!这是SAT真题写作之前考过的话题，就是当讨论一个人在所生活的社区是否快乐时，重点根本不是”是否多样和变化“而是”个人“能否”融入“所生活的社区，从”归属感“和”责任感“来体现”融入“。

你对于这
个题目的观点应该是”一个人生活在所处的社区，快乐不是源自于“变化”而是源自于“融入和归属感”。

【20XX年6月SAT英语写作真题分析】终于写完毕了，希望能够帮助到大家，谢谢！。