下载文档原格式
2011/65/EU（RoHS 2.0）豁免清单（2020年3月5更新）2020年3月5日，欧盟委员会再次发布多项指令(EU) 2020/360 、(EU) 2020/361、(EU) 2020/364、(EU) 2020/365、(EU) 2020/366，更新RoHS指令附件III中第9、9(a)-I,、9(a)-II、41条以及附件IV 中第37、41条豁免条款，同时在附件IV中新增第44条豁免条款。
更新内容涉及六价铬、铅和镉在特定材料中的应用。
此次修订将一些豁免材料用途进行细分并根据细分类别增加新的豁免期限。
上述指令自发布20天后生效，其中针对更新的6项条款要求成员国于2021年4月1日起正式实施，附件IV中新增的第44条于2020年9月1日起实施。
截至2020年3月，RoHS2.0中附件III共45条款，附件IV共44条款更新日期重点摘要2020年3月5日欧盟官方公报(OJ)发布了(EU) 2020/360 、(EU) 2020/361、(EU) 2020/364、(EU) 2020/365、(EU) 2020/366，更新RoHS指令附件III中第9、9(a)-I,、9(a)-II、41条以及附件IV中第37、41条豁免条款，同时在附件IV中新增第44条豁免条款。
截至2020年3月，新RoHS2.0中附件III共45条款，附件IV共44条款。
2019年11月5日欧盟官方公报(OJ)发布了(EU)2019/1845 和(EU)2019/1846 指令修订RoHS指令2011/65 / EU 的附件III 的豁免条款，新增了两项豁免条款。
2019年2月5日欧盟官方公报发布了10项指令(EU)2019/169 - (EU)2019/178，修订RoHS法规2011/65/EU 附件III有关铅和镉的条例。
2018年5月18日欧盟官方公报发布(EU)2018/736 - (EU)2018/742共七条指令，修订欧盟RoHS法规附件III中不同用途下铅的豁免条例。
欧盟议会和欧盟理事会关于在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质的2011/65/EU指令2011年6月8日（改写）（文本与欧洲经济区相关）欧洲议会和欧盟理事会，注意到成立欧盟的条约，特别是其中第114条，注意到欧盟委员会的建议，注意到欧盟经济与社会委员会的意见，注意到欧盟地区委员会的意见，按照例行的立法程序，鉴于：（1）2003年1月27日发布的关于在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质2002/95/EC指令需要做出许多重要的变动，为了进一步明确，该指令需要改写。
（2）各成员国为限制在电子电气设备中使用有害物质而制订的法规或行政措施之间存在的差异会产生贸易壁垒和扭曲共同体内的竞争，甚至对单一市场的建立及其功能产生直接影响。
因此有必要协调成员国在此领域的法规，以利于保护人类健康和报废电子电气设备的回收和处理符合环境要求。
（3）2002/95/EC指令规定，欧盟委员会应基于科技进步并考虑欧盟理事会于2000年12月4日批准的预防原则决议，对特定类别的设备纳入管制范围以及修改限制物质列表进行审议。
（4）2008年11月19日发布的欧盟议会和理事会关于废弃物的2008/98/EC指令在立法上第一次提出了预防废弃物，预防被定义为减少材料和产品中有害物质的措施。
（5）1988年1月25日关于防止镉环境污染行动计划的理事会决议要求委员会持续发展具体的措施。
人体健康必须得到保护，因此，需要实施限制镉的使用和开发镉的替代品的全面战略，该决议强调，镉的使用仅限于尚无替代品的情况。
（6）2004年4月29日，欧盟议会和理事会关于持久性有机污染物的第（EC） 850/2004号规章重申由于持久性污染物的跨国界传输，保护环境和人类健康不受持久性有机污染物的伤害的目标在成员国不能充分的达到，而在欧盟范围内能更好的达到。
根据该规章，为了最终的目标，必须采取可行的措施识别和减少工业生产中无意生产的持久性有机污染物（例如二噁英和呋喃）的排放。
成分仍有可能对人类健康绿色环保，是对人类自身的保护，欧盟的指令形成一个绿色标准，这就要求所有成品和零件部件厂商必须作出相应的响应，构建绿色的生产制造体系，使贯穿整个供应商→客户→消APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED回收电子部件将出口亚洲的电子垃圾将成方英亩，高有害物质对人类及生物的影响场，与清远市龙塘镇、南海区大沥镇等是全国8大电子洋垃圾集散地患病甚至致死的威胁。
长时间的污染严重破坏了贵屿的环境。
由于河水和井水早就变成了黑水，人们不得不购买桶装水以供饮用。
绿色和平组织的调查显示，贵屿的土壤中钡的含量超标10倍以上，锡超标152倍，铅超标212倍，铬超标1338倍。
另有科研人员的调查发现，贵屿镇的环境中致癌物质含量是世界上最高的。
这里妇女的流产率是其他地方的6倍，70％的儿童血液中铅含量超标。
APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED国际环保及HSF产品趋势1APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED RoHS 2.0(RoHS –せ吠吏 諮ざ残RoHS指令中有害物質豁免清單僚 睲虫 穝僚 冈灿僚 睲虫即將到期豁免項APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED Part 3:全球無鹵化要求APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITEDAPPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITEDPart 4:歐盟REACH法規--什么是REACHAPPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITEDAPPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED2010年1月ECHA公布的第二批15項候選清單2010年6月ECHA公布的第三批8項候選清單ECHA公布的第四批11項候選清單APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED APPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITEDW18Microsoft WordゅンAPPROACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED欧盟玩具邻苯二甲酸盐含量限制指令随着人们对人们对Phthalates（邻苯二甲酸盐）的了解,儿童用 品中的邻苯二甲酸盐越来越被重视。
关于在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质的欧盟议会和欧盟理事会第2011/65/EU号指令2011年6月8日（改写）（文本仅适用于欧洲经济区）欧洲议会和欧盟理事会，注意到成立欧盟的条约，特别是其中第114条，注意到欧盟委员会的建议，注意到欧盟经济与社会委员会的意见，注意到欧盟地区委员会的意见，按照例行的立法程序，鉴于：（1）2003年1月27日发布的关于在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质的欧盟议会和欧盟理事会第2002/95/EC号指令需要做出许多重要的变动，为了进一步明确，该指令需要改写。
（2）各成员国为限制在电子电气设备中使用有害物质而制订的法规或行政措施之间存在的差异会产生贸易壁垒和扭曲欧盟内的竞争，甚至对单一市场的建立及其运作产生直接影响。
因此有必要协调成员国在此领域的法规，以利于保护人类健康和进行环境友好回收和处理报废电子电气设备。
（3）2002/95/EC指令规定，欧盟委员会应基于科技进步并考虑欧盟理事会于2000年12月4日批准的预防原则决议，对指令条款进行审议，特别是为了将特定类别的设备纳入管制范围以及修改限制物质列表的需求。
（4）2008年11月19日发布的关于废弃物的欧盟议会和理事会第2008/98/EC号指令在立法上将预防放在首位，预防被定义为减少材料和产品中有害物质的措施。
（5）1988年1月25日关于防止镉环境污染行动计划的理事会决议要求委员会持续发展具体的措施。
人体健康必须得到保护，因此，需要实施限制镉的使用和开发镉的替代品的全面战略，该决议强调，镉的使用仅限于尚无替代品的情况。
（6）2004年4月29日，关于持久性有机污染物的欧盟议会和理事会第（EC）850/2004号规章重申，由于持久性污染物的跨国界传输，保护环境和人类健康不受持久性有机污染物的伤害的目标在成员国不能充分的达到，而在欧盟范围内能更好的达到。
根据该规章，为了最终的目标，必须采取可行的措施识别和减少工业生产中无意生产的持久性有机污染物（例如二噁英和呋喃）的排放。
RoHS指令豁免清单作者：HSF中心2012-04-25 15:05法规名称：关于在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质指令法规简称：RoHS法规代号：2011/65/E UURoHS指令豁免清单序号RoHS豁免项目适用范围及期限1单端(紧凑型)荧光灯中的汞含量不超过(每盏)：1(a)普通照明用<30W：5毫克2011年12月31日到期；2011年12月31日至2012年12月31日执行3.5毫克；2012年12月31日后执行2.5毫克1(b)普通照明用≥30W且< 50W：5毫克2011年12月31日到期；2011年12月31日后执行3.5毫克1(c)普通照明用≥50W且< 150 W：5毫克1(d)普通照明用≥150 W：15毫克1(e)普通照明用，环状或方形结构，管径 ≤17毫米2011年12月31日前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行7毫克1(f)特殊用途：5毫克2(a)普通照明用的双端线型荧光灯中的汞含量不超过(每盏)：2(a)(1)正常寿命的三基色荧光灯，管径< 9毫米(例如T2)：5毫克2011年12月31日到期；2011年12月31日后执行4毫克2(a)(2)正常寿命的三基色荧光灯，管径≥9毫米且≤17毫米(例如T5)：5毫克2011年12月31日到期；2011年12月31日后执行3毫克2(a)(3)正常寿命的三基色荧光灯，管径> 17毫米且≤28毫米(例如T8)：5毫克2011年12月31日到期；2011年12月31日后执行3.5毫克2(a)(4)正常寿命的三基色荧光灯，管径> 28毫米(例如T12)：5毫克2012年12月31日到期；2012年12月31日后执行3.5毫克2(a)(5)长寿命(≥2万5千小时)的三基色荧光灯：8毫克2011年12月31日到期；2011年12月31日后执行5毫克2(b)其它荧光灯中的汞含量不超过(每盏)：2(b)(1)管径> 28毫米的线型卤磷酸盐灯(例如T10和T12)：10毫克2012年4月13日到期2(b)(2)非线型卤磷酸盐灯(各种管径)：15毫克2016年4月13日到期2(b)(3)管径> 17毫米的非线型三基色荧光灯(例如T9)2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行15毫克2(b)(4)其它普通照明用灯和特殊用灯(例如感应灯)2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行15毫克3特殊用途的冷阴极荧光灯及外部电极荧光灯(CCFL和EEFL)中的汞含量不超过(每盏)：3(a)短型(长度≤500毫米)2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行3.5毫克3(b)中型(长度> 500毫米且≤1500毫米)2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行5毫克3(c)长型(长度> 1500毫米)2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行13毫克4(a)其它低压放电灯中的汞(每盏)2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行15毫克4(b)普通照明用的高压钠(蒸气)灯，其显色指数Ra > 60的，其汞含量不超过(每盏):4(b)-Ⅰ功率≤155W 2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行30毫克4(b)-Ⅱ155W < 功率 ≤405 W 2011年12月31日之前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行40毫克4(b)-Ⅲ功率> 405 W 2011年12月31日前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行40毫克4(c)其它普通照明用的高压钠(蒸汽)灯中的汞含量不超过(每盏)：4(c)-Ⅰ功率≤155 W 2011年12月31日前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行25毫克4(c)-Ⅱ155 W < 功率 ≤405 W 2011年12月31日前，无使用限制；2011年12月31日后执行30毫克4(c)-Ⅲ功率> 405 W 2011年12月31日前，无使用限制；2011年12月31后执行40毫克4(d)高压汞(蒸汽)灯(HPMV)中的汞2015年4月13日到期4(e)金属卤化物灯(MH)中的汞4(f)本附录中未提及的，其它特殊用途的放电灯中的汞5(a)阴极射线管的玻璃中的铅5(b)荧光管的玻璃中的铅含量不超过0.2%.6(a)铅作为合金元素，在加工用途的钢和镀锌钢中的含量不超过0.35%6(b)铝合金中的铅含量不超过0.4%6(c)铜合金中的铅含量不超4%7(a)高熔点型焊料中的铅(也就是铅基合金，其铅含量超过85%)7(b)用于服务器、存储器和存储阵列系统中的焊料中的铅，用于为交换、信号发送、传输的网络基础设备中及电信网络管理设施中的焊料中的铅。
关于在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质的欧盟议会和欧盟理事会第2011/65/EU号指令2011年6月8日（改写）（文本仅适用于欧洲经济区）欧洲议会和欧盟理事会，注意到成立欧盟的条约，特别是其中第114条，注意到欧盟委员会的建议，注意到欧盟经济与社会委员会的意见，注意到欧盟地区委员会的意见，按照例行的立法程序，鉴于：（1）2003年1月27日发布的关于在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质的欧盟议会和欧盟理事会第2002/95/EC号指令需要做出许多重要的变动，为了进一步明确，该指令需要改写。
（2）各成员国为限制在电子电气设备中使用有害物质而制订的法规或行政措施之间存在的差异会产生贸易壁垒和扭曲欧盟内的竞争，甚至对单一市场的建立及其运作产生直接影响。
因此有必要协调成员国在此领域的法规，以利于保护人类健康和进行环境友好回收和处理报废电子电气设备。
（3）2002/95/EC指令规定，欧盟委员会应基于科技进步并考虑欧盟理事会于2000年12月4日批准的预防原则决议，对指令条款进行审议，特别是为了将特定类别的设备纳入管制范围以及修改限制物质列表的需求。
（4）2008年11月19日发布的关于废弃物的欧盟议会和理事会第2008/98/EC号指令在立法上将预防放在首位，预防被定义为减少材料和产品中有害物质的措施。
（5）1988年1月25日关于防止镉环境污染行动计划的理事会决议要求委员会持续发展具体的措施。
人体健康必须得到保护，因此，需要实施限制镉的使用和开发镉的替代品的全面战略，该决议强调，镉的使用仅限于尚无替代品的情况。
（6）2004年4月29日，关于持久性有机污染物的欧盟议会和理事会第（EC）850/2004号规章重申，由于持久性污染物的跨国界传输，保护环境和人类健康不受持久性有机污染物的伤害的目标在成员国不能充分的达到，而在欧盟范围内能更好的达到。
根据该规章，为了最终的目标，必须采取可行的措施识别和减少工业生产中无意生产的持久性有机污染物（例如二噁英和呋喃）的排放。
【法规标题】在电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质指令（RoHS指令）（2011年修订）【发布部门】欧盟【发文字号】【适用区域】全国适用【发布时间】2011-06-08【生效时间】2011-06-28【关键词】其它环境管理【有效性】有效【更替信息】【注：此文档于2018年12月由一点通平台导出】Official Journal of the European UnionL 174/88DIRECTIVE 2011/65/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILof 8 June 2011on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment(recast)(Text with EEA relevance)THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of Regions (2),Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (3),Whereas:(1) A number of substantial changes are to be made to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (4). In the interest of clarity, that Directive should be recast.(2) The disparities between the laws or administrative measures adopted by the Member States regarding the restriction of the use of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) could create barriers to trade and distort competition in the Union and may thereby have a direct impact on the establishment and functioning of the internal market. It therefore appears necessary to lay down rules in this field and to contribute to the protection of human health and the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste EEE.(3) Directive 2002/95/EC provides that the Commission shall review the provisions of that Directive, in particular, in order to include in its scope equipment which falls within certain categories and to study the need to adapt the list of restricted substances on the basis of scientific progress, taking into account the precautionary principle, as endorsed by Council Resolution of 4 December 2000.(4) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste(5) gives first priority to prevention in waste legislation. Prevention is defined, inter alia, as measures that reduce the content of harmful substances in materials and products.(5) Council Resolution of 25 January 1988 on a Community action programme to combat environmental pollution by cadmium (6) invited the Commission to pursue without delay the development of specific measures for such a programme. Human health also has to be protected and an overall strategy that in particular restricts the use of cadmium and stimulates research into substitutes should therefore be implemented. The Resolution stresses that the use of cadmium should be limited to cases where suitable alternatives do not exist.(6) Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants (7) recalls that the objective of protecting the environment and human health from persistent organic pollutants cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, owing to the transboundary effects of those pollutants, and can therefore be better achieved at Union level. Pursuant to that Regulation, releases of persistent organic pollutants, such as dioxins and furans, which are unintentional by-products of industrial processes, should be identified and reduced as soon as possible with the ultimate aim of elimination, where feasible.(7) The available evidence indicates that measures on the collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of waste EEE as set out in Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (8) are necessary to reduce the waste management problems associated with the heavy metals and flame retardants concerned. In spite of those measures, however, significant parts of waste EEE will continue to be found in the current disposal routes inside or outside the Union. Even if waste EEE were collected separately and submitted to recycling processes, its content of mercury, cadmium, lead, chromium VI, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) would be likely to pose risks to health or the environment, especially when treated in less than optimal conditions.(8) Taking into account technical and economic feasibility, including for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), the most effective way of ensuring a significant reduction of risks to health and the environment relating to those substances, in order to achieve the chosen level of protection in the Union, is the substitution of those substances in EEE by safe or safer materials. Restricting the use of those hazardous substances is likely to enhance the possibilities and economic profitability of recycling of waste EEE and decrease the negative impact on the health of workers in recycling plants.(9) The substances covered by this Directive are scientifically well researched and evaluated and have been subject to different measures both at Union and at national level.(10) The measures provided for in this Directive should take into account existing international guidelines and recommendations and should be based on an assessment of available scientific and technical information. The measures are necessary to achieve the chosen level of protection of human health and the environment, with due respect for the precautionary principle, and having regard to the risks which the absence of measures would be likely to create in the Union. The measures should be kept under reviewand, if necessary, adjusted to take account of available technical and scientific information. The annexes to this Directive should be reviewed periodically to take into account, inter alia, Annexes XIV and XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency (9). In particular, the risks to human health and the environment arising from the use of Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) and Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) should be considered as a priority. With a view to further restrictions of substances, the Commission should re-investigate the substances that were subject to previous assessments, in accordance with the new criteria set out in this Directive as part of the first review.(11) This Directive supplements the general Union waste management legislation, such as Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.(12) A number of definitions should be included in this Directive in order to specify its scope. In addition, the definition of ‘electrical and electronic equipment’ should be complemented by a definition of‘dependent’, to cover the multipurpose character of certain products, where the intended functions of EEE are to be determined on the basis of objective characteristics, such as the design of the product and its marketing.(13) Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (10) enables specific ecodesign requirements to be set for energy-related products which may also be covered by this Directive. Directive 2009/125/EC and the implementing measures adopted pursuant to it are without prejudice to Union waste management legislation.(14) This Directive should apply without prejudice to Union legislation on safety and health requirements and specific Union waste management legislation, in particular Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators (11) and Regulation (EC) No 850/2004.(15) The technical development of EEE without heavy metals, PBDE and PBB should be taken into account.(16) As soon as scientific evidence is available, and taking into account the precautionary principle, the restriction of other hazardous substances, including any substances of very small size or with a very small internal or surface structure (nanomaterials) which may be hazardous due to properties relating to their size or structure, and their substitution by more environmentally friendly alternatives which ensure at least the same level of protection of consumers should be examined. To this end, the review and amendment of the list of restricted substances in Annex II should be coherent, maximise synergies with, and reflect the complementary nature of the work carried out under other Union legislation, and in particular under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 while ensuring the mutually independent operation of this Directive and that Regulation. Consultation with the relevant stakeholders should be carried out and specific account should be taken of the potential impact on SMEs.(17) The development of renewable forms of energy is one of the Union’s key objectives, and the contribution made by renewable energy sources to environmental and climate objectives is crucial. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotionof the use of energy from renewable sources (12) recalls that there should be coherence between those objectives and other Union environmental legislation. Consequently, this Directive should not prevent the development of renewable energy technologies that have no negative impact on health and the environment and that are sustainable and economically viable.(18) Exemptions from the substitution requirement should be permitted if substitution is not possible from the scientific and technical point of view, taking specific account of the situation of SMEs or if the negative environmental, health and consumer safety impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the environmental, health and consumer safety benefits of the substitution or the reliability of substitutes is not ensured. The decision on exemptions and on the duration of possible exemptions should take into account the availability of substitutes and the socioeconomic impact of substitution. Life-cycle thinking on the overall impacts of exemptions should apply, where relevant. Substitution of the hazardous substances in EEE should also be carried out in such a way as to be compatible with the health and safety of users of EEE. The placing on the market of medical devices requires a conformity assessment procedure, according to Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices (13) and Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (14), which could require the involvement of a notified body designated by competent authorities of Member States. If such a notified body certifies that the safety of the potential substitute for the intended use in medical devices or in vitro diagnostic medical devices is not demonstrated, the use of that potential substitute will be deemed to have clear negative socioeconomic, health and consumer safety impacts. It should be possible, from the date of entry into force of this Directive, to apply for exemptions for equipment, even before the actual inclusion of that equipment in the scope of this Directive.(19) Exemptions from the restriction for certain specific materials or components should be limited in their scope and duration, in order to achieve a gradual phase-out of hazardous substances in EEE, given that the use of those substances in such applications should become avoidable.(20) As product reuse, refurbishment and extension of lifetime are beneficial, spare parts need to be available.(21) Procedures for assessing the conformity of EEE subject to this Directive should be consistent with relevant Union legislation, in particular Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of products (15). Harmonising conformity assessment procedures should give manufacturers legal certainty as to what they have to provide as proof of compliance to the authorities throughout the Union.(22) The conformity marking applicable for products at Union level, CE marking, should also apply to EEE that is subject to this Directive.(23) The market surveillance mechanisms laid down by Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products (16) provide the safeguard mechanisms to check compliance with this Directive.(24) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, particularly with regard to the guidelines and format of applications for exemptions, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules andgeneral principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (17).(25) For the purposes of achieving the objectives of this Directive the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of amendments to Annex II, detailed rules for complying with maximum concentration values, and the adaptation of Annexes III and IV to technical and scientific progress. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.(26) The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those provisions which represent a substantive change as compared with the earlier Directive. The obligation to transpose the provisions which are unchanged arises under the earlier Directive.(27) This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limits for transposition into national law and application of the Directive set out in Annex VII, Part B.(28) When reviewing this Directive, a thorough analysis of its coherence with Regulation (EC) No1907/2006 should be carried out by the Commission.(29) In accordance with paragraph 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making (18), Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Union, their own tables, which will, as far as possible, illustrate the correlation between this Directive and their transposition measures, and to make those tables public.(30) Since the objective of this Directive, namely to establish restrictions on the use of hazardous substances in EEE, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale of the problem and its implications in respect of other Union legislation on recovery and disposal of waste and areas of common interest, such as human health protection, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective,HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:Article 1Subject matterThis Directive lays down rules on the restriction of the use of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) with a view to contributing to the protection of human health and the environment, including the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste EEE.Article 2Scope1. This Directive shall, subject to paragraph 2, apply to EEE falling within the categories set out inAnnex I.2. Without prejudice to Article 4(3) and 4(4), Member States shall provide that EEE that was outside the scope of Directive 2002/95/EC, but which would not comply with this Directive, may nevertheless continue to be made available on the market until 22 July 2019.3. This Directive shall apply without prejudice to the requirements of Union legislation on safety and health, and on chemicals, in particular Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, as well as the requirements of specific Union waste management legislation.4. This Directive does not apply to:(a) equipment which is necessary for the protection of the essential interests of the security of Member States, including arms, munitions and war material intended for specifically military purposes;(b) equipment designed to be sent into space;(c) equipment which is specifically designed, and is to be installed, as part of another type of equipment that is excluded or does not fall within the scope of this Directive, which can fulfil its function only if it is part of that equipment, and which can be replaced only by the same specifically designed equipment;(d) large-scale stationary industrial tools;(e) large-scale fixed installations;(f) means of transport for persons or goods, excluding electric two-wheel vehicles which are not type-approved;(g) non-road mobile machinery made available exclusively for professional use;(h) active implantable medical devices;(i) photovoltaic panels intended to be used in a system that is designed, assembled and installed by professionals for permanent use at a defined location to produce energy from solar light for public, commercial, industrial and residential applications;(j) equipment specifically designed solely for the purposes of research and development only made available on a business-to-business basis.Article 3DefinitionsFor the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions shall apply:(1) ‘electrical and electronic equipment’ or ‘EEE’ means equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic fields in order to work properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and fields and designed for use with a voltage rating not exceeding 1 000 volts for alternating current and 1 500 volts for direct current;。
rohs认证标准ROHS认证标准。
ROHS认证是指符合欧盟指令2011/65/EU要求的限制使用某些有害物质的标准。
ROHS认证标准的制定旨在保护环境和人类健康，限制电子电气产品中的有害物质含量，推动绿色环保生产和消费。
ROHS认证标准适用于电子电气产品及其组件，包括家用电器、信息技术设备、通信设备、医疗设备、照明设备等各类电子电气产品。
ROHS认证标准主要限制以下六种有害物质的含量：1. 铅（Pb）。
2. 汞（Hg）。
3. 镉（Cd）。
4. 六价铬（Cr6+）。
5. 多溴联苯（PBB）。
6. 多溴二苯醚（PBDE）。
ROHS认证标准的制定对于企业来说是一项重要的环保责任和市场准入要求。
通过ROHS认证，企业可以提高产品的环保形象，满足国际市场准入要求，提升产品的市场竞争力。
因此，企业在产品设计、原材料采购、生产制造、质量管理等方面都需要严格遵守ROHS 认证标准，确保产品符合环保要求。
ROHS认证标准的具体实施包括以下几个方面：1. 材料控制，对产品中所使用的材料进行严格管控，确保不含有害物质的使用。
2. 工艺控制，在生产制造过程中，严格控制各道工艺环节，防止有害物质的混入。
3. 检测手段，建立完善的检测手段和检测流程，对产品中的有害物质进行全面检测。
4. 文件记录，建立完善的ROHS认证文件记录体系，确保产品的合规性可追溯。
ROHS认证标准的实施对企业来说既是一种挑战，也是一种机遇。
企业需要加强对供应链的管理，选择合规的原材料供应商，建立健全的原材料采购管理体系，确保产品的原材料符合ROHS认证标准。
同时，企业还需要加强内部管理，建立完善的生产工艺控制和质量管理体系，确保产品的生产制造过程符合ROHS认证标准。
此外，企业还需要加强对产品的检测和监控，确保产品的合规性。
通过ROHS认证标准的实施，企业可以提高产品的品质和竞争力，树立企业的环保形象，赢得消费者的信赖。
总之，ROHS认证标准的实施对于企业来说是一项重要的环保责任和市场准入要求。
