freedom of speech
- 格式:docx
- 大小:140.76 KB
- 文档页数:2
Freedom of speech and information is a basic right.Freedom of speech and information is a basic right. It means you can say what you want to say and you have right to hear other people’s opinion. A British philosopher Milton was the first to bring up the famous opinion of freedom of speech. He thinks that freedom of speech as “the most important freedom —the cradle of all the great wisdom”.Everyone has different point of views about the same thing, t herefore the disagreement appears, and then “freedom of speech”tu rned up.Freedom of speech mainly include the following: Everyone have the fair chance to speak out their own thaughts, and it’s should not differ, due to their status, job, race, believe and culture; everyone should be allowed to freely express their opinion and take part in any discussions; and it allows everyone to equally share their own thoughts and opinions; Everyone not only has the freedom to criticize, but also can defense, counter-criticise and self-criticise ; and to different forms of speech, everyone has the freedom to choose.However, the right to freedom of speech is limited, it is not an absolute freedom. I discovered that there are cases where people’s opinion are ignored or simply remains unnoticed. some people choose to ignore new point of views, or simply accepts whatever the crowd had choosen. Even in worst condition, we still don't give up this right. Youshould have yourself point. So I like a say, “ You can say that you don’t agree to whatever I just proclaimed to belevein, nut you don’t have the right to forbid me from saying it.”Now we can talk about more things. Beause there are more topics for conversations, you can speak out your opinion about National policy. In addition, you can talk about your points of views about love, friendship, money and living. And you have many ways on how to express your opinion through network, television, radio, marching or writing articles.Seaching for information is also very important. We can use these informations to prove our points of view. As the college students need to pay attention to a lot of things. Therefore it is very important for us to read and analyze informations. Everyone have the right to get information freely. A great number of informations are helpful for a man whom does a lot of thinking.So freedom of speech and information is a basic right, we should make good use of it .。
FreedomofSpeech第一篇:Freedom of SpeechTo consider the freedom, in the book liberty, Isaiah Berlin explains that absolut liberty is impossible by describing legative and positive liberty.Based on a country, any law about liberty is for its interest.Therefore, when we explain why the government confine the freedom of speech, we could think it as eliminating the drastic and unfair criticize or blame to the government.In order to improve the level of public moral and avoid destructive polical activities.Therefore, in large extend, it explains communist society and capital society having different degree of limitation on freedom of speech.The most we need to talk about is the laws of different countries,Even though it is not enough.Take the constitution of different countries for example.Almost every country strictly limit the right of freedom of speech.There is such rule in Bill of Rights of U.S.: Congress can't enact the following laws: Establish nation religion or prohibit the freedom of believing;Deprive the freedom of speech or freedom of publishing;Or deprive the right of public assembly and the right of prosecution.In China, Constitution of China gives the next rules: Rule 35: the public of china has the right of freedom of speech;To any illegal perform or deriliction, the public has the right to appeal, prosecute or impeach.However, when the both countries' laws are carried into reality, they are definetely different.We could do a examination.Search“共产党.批评” on BaiDu, we can't get any result about the public criticize on chinese communist.And the n search “criticize.U.S.” on Google.we will be able to find many lines about criticizing America.Besides, in the first argument of U.S.president election this year, Obama publiclycriticized his adversary Romney that he abuses finance.Therefore, when we look at the law and the reality.there are a lots of difference between China and America.That explains that the law or thenational system do little influence to the freedom of speech.But China court laws do more based on the collectivism that protects the interest of a collective or a country and America laws do more based on individulism that protects more about the interrst of individual or freedom.。
象征自由与希望的英文名英文名:"Freedom"(自由)用法:作为一个人的名字基本可以直接使用,以表达对自由的追求或象征自由与希望的意思。
双语例句:1. Freedom is the birthright of every human being.自由是每个人类的天赋权利。
2. She named her daughter Freedom to symbolize the hope for a better future.她给女儿取名叫自由,象征对更美好未来的希望。
3. The abolition of slavery was a victory for freedom and human rights.废除奴隶制度是自由和人权的胜利。
4. Martin Luther King Jr. was a great advocate for freedom and equality.马丁·路德·金是自由和平等的伟大倡导者。
5. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right in democratic societies.言论自由是民主社会的基本权利。
6. The Statue of Liberty in New York is a symbol of freedom.纽约的自由女神像是自由的象征。
7. They fought for their freedom against the oppressive regime.他们为了自由而与压迫政权作斗争。
8. Freedom brings opportunities for personal growth and self-expression.自由为个人成长和自我表达带来机会。
9. The freedom to choose one's own destiny is a powerful motivator.自由选择自己的命运是一种强大的动力。
对于自由的看法英语作文英文回答:Freedom is a fundamental value that is cherished by individuals all over the world. It allows us to express ourselves, make choices, and pursue our own happiness. In my opinion, freedom is essential for personal growth and the development of a thriving society.Firstly, freedom of speech is crucial for the exchange of ideas and the progress of society. It enables individuals to voice their opinions, challenge existing norms, and contribute to public discourse. Without freedom of speech, society would be deprived of diverse perspectives and innovative solutions to problems. For example, in many authoritarian countries, where freedom of speech is restricted, dissenting voices are silenced, and progress is hindered.Furthermore, freedom of religion is vital forrespecting individual beliefs and fostering tolerance. It allows individuals to practice their faith without fear of persecution or discrimination. This freedom promotes harmony and understanding among different religious communities. For instance, in countries where freedom of religion is protected, people of different faiths can coexist peacefully and learn from one another's traditions.Moreover, economic freedom plays a crucial role in promoting prosperity and reducing poverty. It allows individuals to pursue their economic endeavors, start businesses, and engage in trade. Economic freedom encourages innovation, competition, and entrepreneurship, which are essential for economic growth. For example, in countries with high levels of economic freedom, such as Singapore and Hong Kong, individuals have the opportunity to thrive and create wealth.Additionally, personal freedom is essential for individual autonomy and self-determination. It allows individuals to make choices about their own lives,including their career paths, relationships, and personalbeliefs. Personal freedom empowers individuals to live according to their own values and aspirations. For instance, in societies where personal freedom is respected,individuals can choose their own partners and pursuecareers that align with their passions.In conclusion, freedom is a fundamental value that is necessary for personal growth and the development of a thriving society. Freedom of speech, religion, economic opportunities, and personal choices are all essential for individuals to express themselves, pursue their own happiness, and contribute to the progress of society.中文回答:自由是一种被全世界的个人所珍视的基本价值观。
有关自由的英语名言警句真正的自由不是想做什么就做什么,而是不想做什么就可以不做什么。
关于表达自由的英语名言警句大家知道有哪些吗?以下是小编为大家整理的关于自由的英语名言警句,供大家参考,希望能帮到您。
自由的英语名言警句1、谁也不能剥夺我们自由的意志。
No one can deprive our free will.2、自由的土地必须一寸寸夺取。
Free land must be inching capture.3、世上最美好的事物是言论自由。
The best things in the world is freedom of speech.4、自由只有通过友爱才得以保全。
Only through love and preserve the freedom.5、取义成仁今日事,人间遍种自由花。
Take YiChengRen done today, all kinds of human freedom.6、自由是上帝赐给人类的最大的幸福之一。
Freedom is one of the greatest happiness of god to mankind.7、言论自由是一切权利之母。
Freedom of speech is the mother of all rights.8、有高度的自由,才有高深的科学。
A high degree of freedom, just have advanced science.9、否定意志的自由,就无道德可言。
No freedom of will, with no moral.10、科学同思想自由是不可分离的。
Science and freedom of thought are inseparable.11、自由之树必须时时用暴君的血作养料。
The tree of liberty must be constantly with the blood of tyrants.12、自由的目的是为他人创造自由。
To consider the freedom, in the book liberty, Isaiah Berlin explains that absolut liberty is impossible by describing legative and positive liberty.Based on a country, any law about liberty is for its interest. Therefore, when we explain why the government confine the freedom of speech, we could think it as eliminating the drastic and unfair criticize or blame to the government. In order to improve the level of public moral and avoid destructive polical activities.Therefore, in large extend, it explains communist society and capital society having different degree of limitation on freedom of speech.The most we need to talk about is the laws of different countries,Even though it is not enough.Take the constitution of different countries for example. Almost every country strictly limit the right of freedom of speech.There is such rule in Bill of Rights of U.S.: Congress can't enact the following laws: Establish nation religion or prohibit the freedom of believing; Deprive the freedom of speech or freedom of publishing; Or deprive the right of public assembly and the right of prosecution. In China, Constitution of China gives the next rules: Rule 35: the public of china has the right of freedom of speech; To any illegal perform or deriliction, the public has the right to appeal, prosecute or impeach.However, when the both countries' laws are carried into reality, they are definetely different.We could do a examination. Search"共产党. 批评" on BaiDu, we can't get any result about the public criticize on chinese communist. And then search "criticize. U.S." on Google.we will be able to find many lines about criticizing America.Besides, in the first argument of U.S. president election this year, Obama publicly criticized his adversary Romney that he abuses finance.Therefore, when we look at the law and the reality.there are a lots of difference between China and America. That explains that the law or thenational system do little influence to the freedom of speech.But China court laws do more based on the collectivism that protects the interest of a collective or a country and America laws do more based on individulism that protects more about the interrst of individual or freedom.。
我的自由英语作文In the Pursuit of Freedom。
Freedom is a fundamental human right that allows individuals to express themselves, make choices, and live their lives without interference or restrictions. It is a concept that has been cherished and fought for throughout history. In this essay, we will explore the significance of freedom and how it manifests in different aspects of our lives.One of the most important aspects of freedom is freedom of speech. It is the cornerstone of a democratic society, enabling individuals to voice their opinions, engage in debates, and hold those in power accountable. Freedom of speech allows for the exchange of ideas, the exploration of new perspectives, and the progress of society. Without it, we would be living in a world where dissent is silenced, and creativity is stifled.Furthermore, freedom of choice is another essential aspect of freedom. The ability to make decisions about our own lives, such as our education, career, and relationships, is crucial for personal growth and fulfillment. It empowers individuals to pursue their passions, follow their dreams, and shape their own destinies. Without freedom of choice,we would be confined to a predetermined path, limiting our potential and stifling our individuality.Moreover, freedom is closely tied to the concept of human rights. These rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and security, are inherent to all individuals, regardless of their race, gender, or background. They provide a framework for a just and equal society, where everyone is entitled to the same opportunities and protections. Freedom is the driving force behind the fight against discrimination, oppression, and injustice, as it empowers individuals to demand their rights and challenge systemic inequalities.In addition to its societal implications, freedom also plays a significant role in personal development. It allowsindividuals to explore their interests, discover their talents, and pursue their passions. Freedom provides the space for self-reflection, growth, and self-realization. It enables individuals to break free from societal expectations and live authentic lives that align with their values and beliefs. Without freedom, personal growth and fulfillment would be severely hindered.However, it is important to note that freedom is not absolute and should be exercised responsibly. It should not infringe upon the rights and freedoms of others or be used as a means to spread hate or violence. With great freedom comes great responsibility, and it is crucial for individuals to strike a balance between personal freedom and societal harmony.In conclusion, freedom is a fundamental human rightthat is essential for personal growth, societal progress, and the protection of human rights. It encompasses freedom of speech, freedom of choice, and the pursuit of personal fulfillment. It is a concept that should be cherished, protected, and fought for, as it is the foundation of ajust and equal society. In the pursuit of freedom, we must always remember to exercise it responsibly and respect the rights and freedoms of others.。
Basic rights, basic civil, human and political rights are the cornerstone of every democracy, from America to India, Singapore to South Africa, as set out in their various constitutions and in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. For examples, the right to live, the right to vote, the right to a life free from fear and the right to freedom of speech, have all been clearly set out as intrinsic rights which are inalienable and should be duly accorded to every human being. However, the right to freedom of speech has long been the subject of much controversy as to the extent to which this particular right should be guaranteed and to whom.Freedom of speech, like all other rights, has intrinsic value. It, in particular, allows an individual the liberty to express his thoughts without fear of reproach, regardless of what he says. This has important implications for a country in the social and political arenas for it is only when citizens are able to freely express support for or speak up against certain ideas, be they political policies or even social norms, that progress can be achieved. For example, in a totalitarian or dictatorial state, it is only when people are allowed to speak freely and come up with their own political parties, that there can ever be political reform and progress within a country. This is something that is widely accepted to be true and this can be seen in the global community’s support of Burma ’s possible release of opposition leader Aung Sung Su Kyi as a move steeped in foresight and with progress in mind.Similarly, in the social sphere, it is highly beneficial to accord people their right to free speech because it not only breeds a more thinking, more creative societybu it also reduces dissatisfaction and may bring about social reform. If people are not allowed to speak their minds and can only meekly accept whatever comes their way, this is not only detrimental in terms of the type of society being bred, it also gives cause for worry in that citizens may feel deprived of their rights or suppressed, and this could breed latent dissatisfaction in the country. This latent dissatisfaction may result in violence and anger, disrupting stability within a nation. Conversely, if citizens are accorded the right to freedom of speech, this latent dissatisfaction would then have a constructive outlet and backlash would be more peaceful and less antagonistic in nature. This could lead to peaceful social reform, in contrast to the extreme measures that people would otherwise have to undertake in order to successfully put their point across. For example, Martin Luther King, a champion of equal rights in America was allowed to speak up for the rights of the minority, and this was pivotal in bringing about the paradigm shift away from white supremacy to that of equal rights for all. Hence we see that free speech can indeed improve society and enrich people.However, despite its obvious benefits, we cannot be myopic or overly optimistic by failing to recognize the propensity for such a right to be abused. As such, we see that rights are not absolute and they cease to be ‘rights’ as soon as the exercise of that right infringes on the rights of another. Hence, we cannot assess individual freedom in a vacuum and must put it into a real world context. Free speech, like any other freedom, has the potential for abuse and such abuse results in a clash of interests between societal good and individual liberty. An obvious illustration is extremism. Extremists, who hold views widely divergent from those of mainstream, conventional thinkers, are famous for inciting violence, resulting in social upheaval and hence disrupting law and order. This occurs because certain individuals choose specifically to prey on simmering feelings of resentment, which may exist beneath the surface. This could shake the fabric of society and cause great confusion and possibly violence. This happened in Britain . In 1989, a new political party quickly gained popularity in areas north of London such as Birmingham and Westhampton. Being strongly nationalist, they managed to bring to the surface racist sentiments which ultimately culminated in wide-spread racial violence, the worst witnessed in England in twenty years. Hence we see that the abuse of freedom of speech threatened the security of the country and this is something that cannot be condoned, much less thinly veiled by the argument of it being a ‘basic right’. In such instances, it is in the best interest of society to contain, to some extent, the right of the individual for the good of society.Thus, it is evident that while the intrinsic value accorded to rights is not entirely imagined, it is sometimes over-hyped and exaggerated and therefore must be taken with a pinch of salt. We cannot then blindly protect the right to free speech without properly taking stock of the wider implications of the actions of the individual. So, while it is a great injustice to deny people of their basic right to freedom of speech, it is justifiable to choose to curtail the rights of some for the good of society, and to avoid the case of possibly bringing about a breakdown of societal cohesion and a disruption of law and order and peace.。
Angelina Jiang
November 20, 2011,
Essay on the freedom of speech
Current Events A
freedom of speech
If someone asked you: "Are there freedom of speech in China?" Of course, China never lack of freedom of expression. Today, we are equal, to be frank, here exchanging is freedom of expression. Some countries have freedom of speech, frequent replacement of the cabinet, parliament beatings. If such a "free speech" occurred in a population of 1.3 billion Chinese, the consequences would be disastrous. China's "Cultural Revolution" period was a "big-ming, great place, posters, big debate" freedom of speech, the result is many people' basic human rights are not respected, the national economy to the brink of collapse. "Different countries have different standards on freedom of expression, we do not want to impose their own standards to others, do not want people to standards imposed on us."
In China, the Constitution recognizes freedom of expression. But government also provides exercise of freedom of speech rights for citizen, can’t undermine social order, must not violate the Constitution and laws, must not harm national, social, or collective interests of other citizens or lawful freedoms and rights.When citizens do not go back because of fear in expressing their dissatisfaction, the government will not respond to citizens that is so, the government should take actions for their entire responsibility that is subsequently reduced. Freedom of speech advocates often assert that the main reason for the government to suppress freedom of speech is to avoid responsibility. China can freedom of speech, the key to everyone whether you need it at any time, any where, if a person needs to express their strong feelings, this time the freedom of speech is bound to be reflected when more people need such a strong more a matter of course on the meaning of expression.
U.S. citizens the same freedom of expression, you can burn the flag in the United States, the U.S. president can do a variety of policy insult as possible and you can even insulting them laugh (emotional vent). However, if you write articles accusing them of corruption, their families and children to engage in unhealthy practices, then you'd better have evidence, or he may sue you into prison. Similarly, you can criticize the Democrats or Republicans, but if you accuse the party of corruption was rampant, the American people fall into a transfer of state assets, a huge wealth divide U.S. interests, a party and state leaders pocketed the families desperately political parties, saying that the best you can stand the legal test, or to the strength of these parties, and you will not stand forever.U.S. Supreme Court nearly a century of jurisprudence that the views of the majority tend to strictly maintain the principles of the First Amendment. They understand the dangers of free speech may endanger the national security of the "leaked" (like "the Pentagon Papers case"), officers
may be slander the reputation of "slander" (such as "" The New York Times' v. Sullivan "), may incite ethnic hostility and strife, "hate speech" (such as "Brandon Berg v. Ohio") ... but only when these risks are serious enough, be possible to overwhelm the protection of freedom of speech considerations. To this end. Holmes in 1919 that "clear and immediate risk of detection" standard. Many well-known case is that this is a very demanding standards.
Freedom of expression is in accordance with their wishes speak freely and listen to others with the right to be heard. Recently, it is usually understood to include the full freedom of expression, including the creation and distribution of movies, photos, songs, dance and other forms of expressive information.。