【论文】浅谈国际商务合同的翻译

浅论国际贸易中商务英语合同翻译的策略与技巧介绍如下：
随着国际贸易的不断发展，商务英语合同翻译的重要性也逐渐受到关注。

商务英语合同中涉及的条款繁多，表达方式也相对固定，翻译人员需要掌握一定的策略和技巧才能准确、完整地传达原文中的含义。

以下是一些商务英语合同翻译的策略和技巧。

1.意译而非词语翻译
商务英语合同中的某些条款或句子可能没有直接的对应汉语表达，此时需要采用意译的方式来传达意思。

在意译的过程中，要抓住原文的核心思想和含义，同时兼顾翻译的语言规范和习惯。

2.注意条款的精准度
商务英语合同中的条款需要精准地翻译，避免意思上的模糊和歧义，否则可能会引起纠纷和误解。

在翻译过程中，要准确理解条款的用意和含义，并权衡汉语表达方式的准确性和流畅度。

3.了解当地法律法规和商务惯例
商务英语合同中涉及的法律术语和商务惯例往往有所不同，需要根据具体情况进行翻译和解释。

在进行合同翻译时，翻译人员需要了解当地的法律法规和商务惯例，避免出现翻译上的偏差或不当表达。

4.避免机械翻译
机械翻译虽然可以提高翻译效率和速度，但是往往不能精准反映原文的意思。

在商务英语合同翻译中，不能完全依赖机械翻译，需要进行适当的人工修正和调整，确保翻译的准确性和流畅度。

5.重视合同格式和排版
商务英语合同的格式和排版也要注意，对于一些格式和标点符号的处理需要特别关注。

要保持原文的格式和排版，尽量减少误解和不必要的麻烦。

总之，商务英语合同翻译需要翻译人员对商务英语和当地法律法规和商务惯例有较深入的了解，并采用意译、注意条款精准度、避免机械翻译、重视合同格式和排版等技巧和策略，以保证翻译的准确性和流畅度。

外文文献翻译International Business NegotiationsPervez Ghauri & Jean-Claude UsunierWhen two people communicate, they rarely talk about precisely the same subject, for effective meaning is flavored by each person’s own cognitive world and cultural conditioning. Negotiation is the process by which at least two parties try to reach an agreement on matters of mutual interest. The negotiation process proceeds as an interplay of perception, information processing, and reaction, all of which turn on images of reality (accurate or not), on implicit assumptions regarding the issue being negotiated, and on an underlying matrix of conventional wisdom, beliefs, and social expectations. Negotiations involve two dimensions: a matter of substance and the process. The latter is rarely a matter of relevance when negotiations are conducted within the same cultural setting. Only when dealing with someone from another country with a different cultural background does process usually become a critical barrier to substance; in such settings process first needs to be established before substantive negotiations can commence. This becomes more apparent when the negotiation process is international, when cultural differences must be bridged.When negotiating internationally, this translates into anticipating culturally related ideas that are most likely to be understood by a person of a given culture. Discussions are frequently impeded because the two sides seem to be pursuing different paths of logic; in any cross cultural context, the potential for misunderstanding and talking past each other is great. Negotiating internationally almost certainly means having to cope with new and inconsistent information, usually accompanied by new behavior, social environments, and even sights and smells. The greater the cultural differences, the more likely barriers to communication and misunderstandings become. When one takes the seemingly simple process of negotiations into a cross-cultural context, it becomes even more complex and complications tend to grow exponentially. It is naive indeed to venture into international negotiation with the belief that “after all, people are pretty much alike everywhere and behave much as we do.” Even if they wear the same clothes you do, speak English as well as (or even better than) you, and prefer many of the comforts and attributes of American life (food, hotels, sports), it would be foolish to view amember of another culture as a brother in spirit. That negotiation style you use so effectively at home can be ineffective and inappropriate when dealing with people from another cultural background; in fact its use can often result in more harm than gain. Heightened sensitivity, more attention to detail, and perhaps even changes in basic behavioral patterns are required when working in another culture.Members of one culture may focus on different aspects of an agreement (e.g., legal, financial) than may members of another culture (personal, relationships). The implementation of a business agreement may be stressed in one culture, while the range and prevention of practical problems may be emphasized in another culture. In some cultures, the attention of people is directed more toward the specific details of the agreement (documenting the agreement), while other cultures may focus on how the promises can be kept (process and implementation). Americans negotiate a contract; the Japanese negotiate a personal relationship. Culture forces people to view and value differently the many social interactions inherent in fashioning any agreement. Negotiations can easily break down because of a lack of understanding of the cultural component of the negotiation process. Negotiators who take the time to understand the approach that the other parties are likely to use and to adapt their own styles to that one are likely to be more effective negotiators.American and Russian people are not similar; their ethical attitudes do not coincide: they evaluate behavior differently. What an American may consider normative, positive behavior (negotiating and reaching a compromise with an enemy), a Russian perceives as showing cowardice, weakness, and unworthiness; the word “deal”has a strong negative connotation, even today in contemporary Russia. Similarly, for Russians, compromise has negative connotation; principles are supposed to be inviolable and compromise is a matter of integrity (The Russians are not alone here: a Mexican will not compromise as a matter of honor, dignity, and integrity; likewise, an Arab fears loss of manliness if he compromises.) A negotiation is treated as a whole without concessions. At the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) talks, the Americans thought they had an agreement (meaning conclusive commitment), while the Russians said it was an understanding (meaning an expression of mutual viewpoint or attitude). When the Americans thought they had an understanding, the Russians said it was a procedural matter, meaning they had agreed to a process for conducting the negotiation. Different cultural systems can produce divergent negotiating styles--styles shaped by each nation’s culture, geography, history, and political system. Unless you see the world through the other’s eyes (nomatter how similar they appear to you), you may not be seeing or hearing the same. No one can usually avoid bringing along his or her own cultural assumptions, images, and prejudices or other attitudinal baggage into any negotiating situation. The way one succeeds in cross cultural negotiations is by fully understanding others, using that understanding to one’s own advantage to realize what each party wants from the negotiations, and to turn the negotiations into a win-win situation for both sides. A few potential problems often encountered during a cross-cultural negotiation include ( Frank, 1992):Insufficient understanding of different ways of thinking.Insufficient attention to the necessity to save face.Insufficient knowledge of the host country--including history, culture, government, status of business, image of foreigners.Insufficient recognition of political or other criteria.Insufficient recognition of the decision-making process.Insufficient understanding of the role of personal relations and personalities.Insufficient allocation of time for negotiations.Over two-thirds of U.S.-Japanese negotiation efforts fail even though both sides want to reach a successful business agreement (The U.S. Department of Commerce is even more pessimistic; it estimates that for every successful American negotiation with the Japanese, there are twenty-five failures.) In fact, these numbers hold true for most cross-cultural meetings. Often barriers to a successful agreement are of a cultural nature rather than of an economical or legal nature. Since each side perceives the other from its own ethnocentric background and experience, often neither side fully comprehends why the negotiations failed. It is precisely this lack of knowledge concerning the culture and the “alien” and “unnatural” expectations of the other side that hinders effective negotiation with those from another culture.In cross-cultural negotiations, many of the rules taught and used domestically may not apply--especially when they may not be culturally acceptable to the other party. For most Western negotiators this includes the concepts of give and take, of bargaining, and even of compromise. The stereotypical, common Western ideal of a persuasive communicator--highly skilled in debate, able to overcome objections with verbal flair, an energetic extrovert--may be regarded by members of other cultures as unnecessarily aggressive, superficial, insincere, even vulgar and repressive. To other Americans, the valued American traits of directness and frankness show evidence of good intentions and personal convictions. To an American it is complimentary to becalled straightforward and aggressive. This is not necessarily so, however, for members of other cultures. To describe a person as “aggressive”is a derogatory characterization to a British citizen. To the Japanese, those very same traits indicate lack of confidence in one’s convictions and insincerity. Instead, terms such as thoughtful, cooperative, considerate, and respectful instill positives in the Japanese and many Asian cultures.Domestically, the study of negotiation tends to encompass business relationships between parties, tactics, bargaining strategies, contingency positions, and so on. However, in a cross-cultural context, besides the usual rules of negotiation, one has to be wary of fine nuances in relationships and practices and how they are perceived and executed by members of the other culture. The two business negotiators are separated from each other not only by physical features, a totally different language, and business etiquette, but also by a different way to perceive the world, to define business goals, to express thinking and feeling, to show or hide motivation and interests. From the other party’s perspective, for example, to some cultures Americans may appear aggressive and rude, while to others, those very same Americans appear calm and uninterested.1 The Art of NegotiationsThe word “negotiations”stems from the Roman word negotiari meaning “to carry on business” and is derived from the Latin root words neg (not) and otium (ease or leisure). Obviously it was as true for the ancient Romans as it is for most businesspersons of today that negotiations and business involves hard work. A modern definition of negotiation is two or more parties with common (and conflicting) interests who enter into a process of interaction with the goal of reaching an agreement (preferably of mutual benefit). John Kenneth Galbraith said “Sex apart, negotiation is the most common and problematic involvement of one person with another, and the two activities are not unrelated.” Negotiations are a decision-making process that provides opportunities for the parties to exchange commitments or promises through which they will resolve their disagreements and reach a settlement.A negotiation is two or more parties striving to agree when their objectives do not coincide.Negotiation consists of two distinct processes: creating value and claiming value. Creating value is a cooperative process whereby the parties in the negotiation seek to realize the full potential benefit of the relationship. Claiming value is essentially a competitive process. The key to creating value is finding interests that the parties havein common or that complement each other, then reconciling and expanding upon these interests to create a win-win situation. Parties at the negotiating table are interdependent. Their goals are locked together. A seller cannot exist without a buyer. The purpose of a negotiation is a joint decision-making process through which the parties create a mutually acceptable settlement. The objective is to pursue a win-win situation for both parties.Negotiations take place within the context of the four Cs: common interest, conflicting interests, compromise, and criteria (Moran and Stripp, 1991). Common interest considers the fact that each party in the negotiation shares, has, or wants something that the other party has or does. Without a common goal, there would be no need for negotiation. Conflict occurs when people have separate but conflicting interests. Areas of conflicting interests could include payment, distribution, profits, contractual responsibilities, and quality. Compromise involves resolving areas of disagreement. Although a win-win negotiated settlement would be best for both parties, the compromises that are negotiated may not produce the result. The criteria include the conditions under which the negotiations take place. The negotiation process has few rules of procedure. Rules of procedure are as much a product of negotiation as the issues. Over time, the four Cs change and the information, know-how, and alternatives available to the negotiating international company and the host country also change, resulting in a fresh interpretation of the four Cs, the environment, and the perspective. In essence, negotiation takes place within the context of the political, economic, social, and cultural systems of a country. The theory of the negotiation process includes the following dimensions: (1) bargainer characteristics, (2) situational constraints, (3) the process of bargaining, and (4) negotiation outcomes. This theory is based on actors who share certain values and beliefs based on their culture. These actors function in business and economic situations that also have cultural influences, and they act in certain culturally inscribed ways. We bargain when:1. A conflict of interest exists between two or more parties; that is, what is, whatone wants is not necessarily what the other one wants.2. A fixed or set of rules or procedures for resolving the conflict does not exist,or the parties prefer to work outside of a set of rules to invent their own solution to the conflict.3. The parties, at least for the moment, prefer to search for agreement rather thanto fight openly, to have one side capitulate, to permanently break off contact, or to take their dispute to a higher authority to resolve it.In summary, negotiations primarily consists of five aspects: (1) goals: motivating the parties to enter; (2) the process of negotiating that involves communications and actions; (3) outcomes; (4) preexisting background factors of cultural traditions and relations; and (5) specific situational conditions under which the negotiation is conducted.2 VerbalLanguage is highly important. When people from different cultures communicate, culture-specific factors affect how they encode and decode their messages. Negotiators should check understanding periodically, move slowly, use questions liberally, and avoid slang and idioms. Even the discussion of negotiation, compromise, and agreement has different meanings to different cultures. Both the American and Korean meanings for the word “corruption”are negative; however in the United States, the word connotes being morally wrong while for the Koreans it implies being socially unfortunate. The Mexican will not compromise as a matter of honor, dignity, and integrity. The Arab fears loss of manliness if he compromises. In Russia, compromise has a negative connotation; principles are supposed to be inviolable and compromise is a matter of integrity. For Russians, a negotiation is treated as a whole without concessions.In the American culture, those who refuse to bargain are viewed as cold, secretive, and not really serious about conducting business. The Dutch are not hagglers; you should make your offer fairly close to your true asking price; if you start making large concessions you will lose their confidence. The Swedes are methodical, detailed individuals who are slow to change positions. Bargaining is not highly valued in Swedish culture; those who bargain, who attempt to negotiate by offering a higher price in order to concede to a lower price, can be viewed as untrustworthy, inefficient, or perhaps out for personal gain at the expense of others.3 Nonverbal Communications in Cross-Cultural NegotiationsNonverbal behavior may be defined as any behavior, intentional or unintentional, beyond the words themselves that can be interpreted by a receiver as having meaning. Nonverbal behaviors could include facial expressions, eye contact, gestures, body movements, posture, physical appearance, space, touch, and time usage. They are all different from culture to culture. Nonverbal behaviors either accompany verbalmessages or are used independently of verbal messages. They may affirm and emphasize or negate and even contradict spoken messages. Nonverbal behaviors are more likely to be used unconsciously and spontaneously because they are habitual and routine behaviors.The wide range of behaviors called nonverbal behavior can be divided into seven categories. Gestures, body movement, facial movement, and eye contact are combined in the kinesic code commonly called body language. Vocalics refers to call vocal activity other than the verbal context itself. Also called paralanguage, vocalics includes tone, volume, and sounds that are not words. Behaviors that involve touching are placed in the haptics code. The use of space is called proxemics, and the use of time is chronemics. Physical appearance includes body shape and size, as well as clothing and jewelry. Finally, artifacts refer to objects that are associated with a person, such as one’s desk, car, or books. It should be emphasized that these codes do not usually function independently or sequentially; rather, they work simultaneously. In addition, nonverbal behavior is always sending messages; we can not communicate without using them, although, at times, the messages may be ambiguous. This wide range of nonverbal behaviors serves various functions in all face-to-face encounters. Most important, emotional messages at the negotiating table are expressed nonverbally by gestures, tone of voice, or facial expressions. The other side’s interpretation of your statement depends on the nonverbal more than what was actually said. Nonverbal communications is significant.From: International Business Negotiations, 2001国际商务谈判伯维茨.高利, 简.科劳德.阿斯尼尔当两个人交流时,他们很少精确地谈论相同的问题,因为实际的意思会受到每个人认知的世界和文化熏陶的影响。

浅谈国际商务合同翻译原则浅谈国际商务合同翻译原则及结尾组成，而且正文中的各个条款也相对固定，只需做稍许改变。

因此，译者在翻译的时候要特别注意已经约定俗成的一些规定及词语。

例如：doumentar bill at sight 可以翻译为即期付有单据的票据虽然表达的意思符合原文意思，但是概念模糊不清。

因为票据本来涵义就十分广泛，而在商务英语中的票据大多数指汇票，因此可译为跟单汇票。

而且中英文在语言结构上存在很大的差别，中文结构较为松散，英文结构较为严谨些，这些都会造成文章不通顺。

再者，商务合同的条款本来就比较繁琐，翻译时要首先弄清全文，在弄清各个条款之间的内在联系，切不可拘泥于原文的句法和条条框框，来达到译文的条理清晰，通顺。

切不可像初学者一样，不加斟酌，生掰硬套，致使译文更加晦涩难懂。

结语：通过以上对合同翻译原则的探讨，我们发现合同语言不同于日常生活用语。

合同语言专业性强，句子复杂难翻译，专业词汇多，涉及的知识面范围广。

因此，作为一名译者，拥有过硬的语言功底是远远不够的，还需要有一定的专业知识背景，了解一定的翻译原则，与时俱进，不断充实自己。

在实践中摸索，不断总结英汉两种语言翻译的异同，切实提高翻译能力，语言水平和审美情趣。

上文就是给您带来的国际商务合同翻译原则，希望可以更好的帮助到您!!网上银行的发展依赖于计算机信息技术的发展和电子商务的普及，同时网上银行的发展也促进了电子商务和计算机技术的发展。

我国网上银行的发展，关键是发展互联网信息技术，论文格式论文范文毕业论文下面是我收集的我国网上银行的发展，欢迎阅读! 网上银行的发展依赖于计算机信息技术的发展和电子商务的普及，同时网上银行的发展也促进了电子商务和计算机技术的发展。

我国网上银行的发展，关键是发展互联网信息技术，核心是发展银行的综合实力，只有这样我国的银行业才能适应全球化的浪潮。

只有我国银行业解决好互联网金融赖以发展的互联网科技问题，并通过学习和借鉴外国的先进经验，不断整合不断创新，研究出具有中国特色的互联网金融产品，才有可能在日趋激烈的网银市场竞争中取得优势地位，从而在经济及金融全球化的浪潮中建立起具有中国特色的网上银行品牌。

最新整理国际商务合同翻译国际商务合同翻译研究一、国际商用合同的特点与翻译目的论概要（一）国际商用合同的特点国际商务合同核心价值体现在国际范围内用来维护商务合同相关利益主体（一般是合同双方）合法权益，并明确界定各自义务的法律文书，对国际经济与贸易的规范化发展具有重意义和作用。

关于国际商务合同的特点，概括来讲主要体现在三个方面，即专业性、规范性和法律性。

所谓专业性，主要是指国际商务合同的内容涉及大量专业术语，比如Return the allocation proportion、Appendix to tender、The Contractors documents for approval等，它要求翻译人员不仅具备良好的语言素质，更具备坚实的国际经济与贸易基础。

所谓规范性，是指国际商务合同的用语，尤其是翻译语言要切实做到完整规范，尽可能使用完整句子，并注重特定修饰语言的合理使用，切勿使用简单句、疑问句、反问句和感叹句。

所谓法律性，是指国际商务合同作为规范合同双方乃至多方权利和义务的一种法律文书，要求无论是格式还是用语均必须严格遵循有关法律法规要求，尤其是要合乎国际经济与贸易领域的有关法律法规。

（二）翻译目的论基本概要翻译目的论最早是德国翻译学家弗米尔（Vermeer）在研究中提出的一种翻译假说，该学说核心要义是翻译不仅仅是一种语言文化现象，而是一种具有特定目的的文化交流载体或工具。

在翻译目的论看来，人类的经济社会活动总是在特定情境中发生的，具有特定的目的性和效果价值追求，因此翻译者在进行翻译时决不可仅仅根据语言学的理论和方法，将两种语言进行简单的对接，从而就大功告成。

由此可以看，目的视角下的翻译工作，对翻译者的综合素质提出了更高的要求，它不仅要求翻译者具有特定的语言学功底，更要深刻领会翻译对象的中心思想和目的追求，重在突出翻译过程的目的性以及翻译内容的功能性，要求翻译人员不仅要对翻译内容进行精准把握，更要从深层次把握翻译的目的和价值追求，在此基础上合理选择翻译方法与翻译策略。

自改革开放以来，我国对外经济交往日益频繁。

在对外经济活动中，所有国际商务活动的进行都需要签订合同和书写法律文书。

尤其在中国加入世贸组织之后，随着经济的发展和信息全球化，跨国商务交往更加频繁，这就促进了对商务合同进行翻译的需求。

但由于专业背景的欠缺和英汉文化差异的存在，目前不少商务合同的翻译存在许多问题，有时可能会错误百出。

而这些不符合规范的商务合同的翻译不但会引发法律纠纷，造成巨大的经济损失甚至还可能扰乱国际市场秩序，由此可以看出商务合同的翻译需要有具体的基本原则和翻译策略的指导。

有鉴于此，本文作者着手试析英文商务合同翻译的基本原则和策略。

本文第一部分介绍了商务英文合同翻译的现状及存在的问题。

第二部分针对英文商务合同翻译的“忠实原文、用词准确”、“译文完整、文体规范”、“达意通顺、条理清晰”等方面来阐述英文商务合同的翻译原则。

第三部分是对英文商务合同翻译的技巧进行了列举，如了解汉语的表达习惯、熟悉与商务英语相关的专业知识、使用专业术语翻译。

第四部分为本论文的结论部分，英文商务合同的翻译策略,并不是一成不变的，应该学会变通和灵活运用各种翻译技巧,不同的场合和语境中根据翻译的基本原则采用不同的翻译策略,无论怎样,英文商务合同的翻译首先要忠实于原文，然后要正确把握合同中的词义，注意翻译中的措辞以免引起歧义使整个译文融于一体。

关键词：英文商务合同；翻译原则；翻译技巧前言一、英文商务合同翻译的现状及存在的问题 (1)（一）英文商务合同翻译的现状 (1)（二）英文商务合同翻译中存在的问题 (1)二、英文商务合同翻译的基本原则 (2)（一）忠实原文、用词准确 (2)（二）译文完整、文体规范 (2)（三）达意通顺、条理清晰 (3)三、英文商务合同的翻译技巧 (3)（一）了解汉语的表达习惯 (3)（二）熟悉与商务英语相关的专业知识 (3)（三）使用专业术语翻译 (4)（四）了解商务合同的语言特点 (4)（五）分清该商务合同的种类 (4)（六）用规范化的书面语言进行翻译 (4)（七）确保内容完善 (5)（八）用词精练 (5)结论 (5)参考文献 (6)致谢 (7)浅谈英文商务合同的翻译原则和策略随着经济的发展，改革开放后的中国日益融入于全球这个大家庭中，国际经济贸易活动日益频繁，而在对外贸易中英语作为一种必不可少的交际工具，这就使英语成为了贸易双方交往的一种媒介。

浅论国际贸易中商务英语合同翻译的策略与技巧一、本文概述在全球化日益深入的今天，国际贸易活动日益频繁，商务英语合同作为跨国交易中不可或缺的一环，其重要性不言而喻。

商务英语合同不仅详细规定了交易双方的权利与义务，还为可能出现的争议提供了法律依据。

因此，商务英语合同的翻译工作在国际贸易中扮演着举足轻重的角色。

本文旨在探讨国际贸易中商务英语合同翻译的策略与技巧，以期提高翻译质量，促进国际贸易的顺利进行。

我们将对商务英语合同的特点和翻译要求进行深入分析，明确翻译过程中应遵循的原则。

接着，我们将结合具体案例，探讨商务英语合同翻译中常用的策略与技巧，如直译与意译的灵活运用、词汇的精确选择、句子结构的调整等。

本文还将对商务英语合同翻译中可能遇到的难点和挑战进行分析，并提出相应的解决方案。

通过本文的研究，我们希望能为从事商务英语合同翻译工作的专业人员提供有益的参考和启示，推动国际贸易的健康发展。

二、商务英语合同的语言特点商务英语合同是一种具有法律效力和商业约束力的正式文件，因此在语言上呈现出一些独特的特点。

商务英语合同的语言必须准确无误，避免使用模棱两可或含糊不清的表达方式。

合同中的每一个词汇、每一个短语都需要精确无误地传达其原始含义，以避免误解和争议。

商务英语合同的语言通常采用正式、专业的术语。

这是因为合同涉及的法律和商业概念往往比较复杂，需要使用专业术语来准确表达。

同时，正式的语言风格也增强了合同的权威性和严肃性。

商务英语合同的语言还注重客观性和中立性。

合同文本不应包含任何主观情感或个人立场，而应保持客观、中立的描述。

这有助于确保合同内容的公正性和公平性，避免任何一方在理解合同内容时产生偏见或误解。

商务英语合同的语言还需要考虑其法律效应。

合同中的语言应当符合相关法律的规定，确保合同的合法性和有效性。

合同中的语言还应当注意避免产生任何潜在的法律风险，如使用过于模糊或不确定的措辞。

商务英语合同的语言特点主要体现在准确性、专业性、客观性、中立性和法律效应上。

毕业论文：从目的论角度分析国际商务英语翻译策略摘要：在国际商务合同的翻译过程中，以目的原则作为指导准则，一方面基于忠实原则，力求做到译本准确严谨，另一方面基于连贯原则，力求做到译本规范通顺，有利于实现译文在目标语文化中的预期功能，具备与原文同等的法律效力。

本文是对个案的翻译实践进行的分析，且仅限于单一类型的合同文本(合伙协议)，提取的实例数量有限，研究具有局限性，需结合多个文本，多角度、多层次进行。

一理论概述20世纪70年代，hansvermeer提出了目的论，认为翻译是以原文为基础的有目的和有结果的行为。

”任何翻译行为都是由翻译的目的决定的，简而言之，就是‘翻译的目的决定翻译的手段’”[5]。

学界普遍认为运用目的论来指导应用文体翻译实践有着重要的现实意义和理论价值，因为“它(目的论)不仅可以在宏观策略上为应用翻译指明方向，还可为译者顺利实施不同文本的翻译策略提供可行性途径”[6]53，“与应用类语篇的翻译实践有更密切的关系，具有更直接的指导作用”[7]。

二、研究个案的背景作为法律英语翻译，国际商务合同的原文和译文都属于“契约文体”[8]，具备法律效力，规范和约束着合同各方的权利和义务。

研究个案为中国医药城在20xx年第二届中国(泰州)国际医药博览会期间与美国某研究院签订的战略合作合同，属于合伙协议(partnershipagreement)，是合同当事人各方就医药产业领域展开合作所发生的权利和义务关系而达成的书面协议。

源语文本由美国某研究院提供，笔者受中国医药城委托对此文本进行翻译。

经中国医药城同意后，将该联盟合同(源语文本和译语文本)用于个人翻译实践的研究，对涉及保密信息的相关内容进行了技术处理。

该合同格式规范，内容完整，条款清晰，语言严谨，体现了法律语言的文体特征，具有可研究性。

三、目的论及其三个基本原则的应用宏观层面上，依据目的论的目的原则，分析国际商务合同翻译要求的要素，如原作者的意图、翻译过程的发起者、译文接收者、译者以及预期文本功能等，明确翻译目的，使译文要达到预期文本功能，尽可能地实现与源语文本相同法律效力。

浅谈国际商务合同翻译原则浅谈国际商务合同翻译原则 下面是小编收集的国际商务合同翻译原则，欢迎阅读! Abstract：Since the reform and opening up ，we have more and more international economic and trade activities ，thus we need to sign and write more and more legal documents .Business contracts are very important as a media .Business contracts are legal documents and are binding on both sides. Small errors in contract will caused huge losses .This paper lists a lot of examples to analysis the principle of the international business contract translation ，hoping to be of help. Keyword：International ; Business contract ; The principle of translation 前言 21世纪是一个催人奋进的时代，科技革命迅猛发展，知识更替日新月异，国际竞争力日趋激烈。

中国加入世贸组织以来，与它国经济交流越来越多，经济发展日益国际化。

与国内经济不同，国际经贸活动要涉及两个或两个以上国家或地区的当事人，因此需要一个媒介来促使双方达成共识.国际商务合同作为媒介的作用突现出来。

 合同，也叫契约，契意思相投或相合，约是用语言文字互相遵守约定，合同是指自愿订立共同遵守的条件，合作共事。

《中华人民共和国》第二条规定合同是平等主体的自然人，法人，其他组织之间设立，变更，终止民事权利义务关系的协议〔contracts referred to in this law are agreements between equal natural persons，legal persons and other organizations for the purpose of establishing，altering and terminating mutual civil rights and obligations〕。