下载文档原格式
T h e M a n i n t h e W a t e r译文The Man in the Water (课文翻译)跟人类所经历的其他灾难相比，这次算得上是相当严重，但并不是史无前例的，确切的说，算不上美国历史上最严重的空难。
当然，这次灾难也有与众不同的地方。
例如，事故发生在桥上，肇事飞机在交通高峰期撞到桥上。
还有就是事故发生的地点与众不同。
华盛顿这个秩序井然的城市，因为隆冬的匆匆到来和这次事故变得人心惶惶。
事故发生时，华盛顿国家机场的飞机跟往常一样像饥饿的鸽子般在总统纪念碑上空盘旋，坠落的那架就成了它们的象征。
紧接着，那架蓝绿相间有空中花园之称的佛罗里达客机轰得坠落，在冰块中消失的无影无踪，虽然这样，姿势却仍优雅万分。
可以肯定地说，这些都是值得注意的。
然而除了死亡人数之外，这次事故再没有什么与众不同的地方。
死亡总是特别的，但未必总会引起千百万人的瞩目。
那么震惊之处何在呢？也许在这场灾难中，人们看到的不仅仅是机械故障，或许他们就根本没有看到故障，而是发现了自己的某些成功之处。
毕竟，这是两种力量的碰撞：自然力量和人的性格。
大自然的力量总是如此无情，上周三硬是让90次航班坠落。
也正是在那天下午，人的品质——在摸索与挣扎中——奋起反抗，应对灾难。
在这次事件中，有四个公认的英雄，其中三个有幸活下来解释他们的英勇行为。
唐纳德厄舍和尤金温沙是公园巡警直升机的队员，他们两人一次次冒着生命危险把起落架放进水中去搭救幸存者。
在电视上，他们俩并排站着，把自己的所作所为说成是分内之事。
28岁的斯库尼克是国会预算办公室职员，他说：“我从未想过自己会那样做”——指他跳下水去把一个受伤的妇女拖上岸的事迹，他又接着说：“总得有人跳下水。
”这句话成为众多英雄的口头禅，虽无新意却仍令人钦佩。
事实上，并没有谁非下水不可，但有人却真的这样做了，这也是之所以悲剧的阴霾在人们心中久久不能散去的原因。
这次灾难中最最牵动千万人心弦的当属那个起初被称为“水中人”的英雄，他秃顶，大约五十多岁的年纪。
themaninthewater课文主旨
摘要：
1.引言：介绍《自救赎金句》的作者及其背景
2.内容概述：概括《自救赎金句》的主要内容
3.金句解读：分析《自救赎金句》中的几个经典金句
4.总结：对《自救赎金句》的评价和意义
正文：
《自救赎金句》是印度著名作家naval ravikant 所写的一本自我成长和心灵励志的书。
这本书中，naval ravikant 分享了他从贫穷到富有，从失败到成功的人生经历和感悟，旨在帮助读者找到自我救赎的道路。
在这本书中，naval ravikant 提出了许多引人深思的观点。
他认为，人生的意义在于追求真实的自我，找到自己的热情和使命，而不是为了金钱和名利而活。
他强调，人们应该学会接受现实，放下过去的痛苦和未来的担忧，专注于当下的生活和工作。
他还鼓励人们勇于面对自己的恐惧和挑战，不断地学习
和成长，才能实现自我救赎。
其中，有几个金句值得我们深入解读。
首先，“你的痛苦来自于你想要的和你所拥有的之间的差距”，这句话提醒我们要珍惜现有的一切，而不是一味地追求更多。
其次，“如果你不喜欢现在的自己，那么等到将来，你也不会喜欢自己”，这句话告诉我们，我们应该接受并喜欢现在的自己，而不是期待在未来变成另一个人。
最后，“你的真正价值是你能为他人带来多少价值”，这句话强调了我们应该关注他人的需求，用自己的能力和价值去帮助他人，才能实现真正的成功。
Unit-04-The-man-in-the-wate r-译文Lesson SixText A水里那个人The Man in the Water和一般灾难相比，这次灾难非常可怕，但并不特殊，肯定也不是美国有记录的最悲惨的堕机事件之一。
As disasters go, this one was terrible, but not unique, certainly not among the worst U. S. air crashes on record.当然，不同寻常的有那座桥，还有飞机是在交通高峰期撞到桥上。
另外，还有这个事件发生的地点。
There was the unusual element of the bridge, of course, and the fact that the plane hit it at a moment of high traffic. Then, too, there was the location of the event.华盛顿这个布局合理、井然有序的城市，由于寒冬一阵突如其来的强劲气流和金属之间的剧烈碰撞而陷入混乱之中。
Washington, the city of form and rules, turned chaotic by a blast of real winter and a single slap of metal on metal.从华盛顿国家机场起飞的喷气客机，通常会像Here, after all, were two forms of nature in collision: the elements and human character.上周三，与平时一样冷漠的恶劣天气，将90次班机击落下来。
Last Wednesday, the elements, indifferent as ever, brought down Flight 90.在同一个下午，人的品质——搜索着，挣扎着——奋起应对这个（艰难）时刻。
themaninthewater的课文主旨
摘要：
1.课文概述
2.课文主题
3.课文结构
4.主题意义
正文：
1.课文概述
《themaninthewater》是一篇讲述人与自然和谐相处的故事，通过描述一个渔夫与一条大鱼的相遇，展现了人与自然之间应该保持敬畏和尊重的主题。
2.课文主题
课文的主题是人与自然和谐共生，强调人类应该尊重自然、保护生态环境，以实现人与自然的和谐共处。
3.课文结构
课文共分为三个部分：第一部分描述了渔夫在大海边的捕鱼生活；第二部分讲述了渔夫与一条大鱼的相遇，以及他们之间的斗争；第三部分描绘了渔夫对大鱼的敬意，以及他对保护海洋生态的决心。
4.主题意义
课文通过渔夫与大鱼的故事，传达了人与自然应该和谐共生的观念。
渔夫在与大鱼的斗争中，意识到人类应该尊重自然、保护生态环境，而不是掠夺和
破坏。
这一观念不仅对于渔业，也对于其他产业和人类社会的发展具有重要的启示意义。
The Man in the Water (课文翻译)跟人类所经历的其他灾难相比，这次算得上是相当严重，但并不是史无前例的，确切的说，算不上美国历史上最严重的空难。
当然，这次灾难也有与众不同的地方。
例如，事故发生在桥上，肇事飞机在交通高峰期撞到桥上。
还有就是事故发生的地点与众不同。
华盛顿这个秩序井然的城市，因为隆冬的匆匆到来和这次事故变得人心惶惶。
事故发生时，华盛顿国家机场的飞机跟往常一样像饥饿的鸽子般在总统纪念碑上空盘旋，坠落的那架就成了它们的象征。
紧接着，那架蓝绿相间有空中花园之称的佛罗里达客机轰得坠落，在冰块中消失的无影无踪，虽然这样，姿势却仍优雅万分。
可以肯定地说，这些都是值得注意的。
然而除了死亡人数之外，这次事故再没有什么与众不同的地方。
死亡总是特别的，但未必总会引起千百万人的瞩目。
那么震惊之处何在呢？也许在这场灾难中，人们看到的不仅仅是机械故障，或许他们就根本没有看到故障，而是发现了自己的某些成功之处。
毕竟，这是两种力量的碰撞：自然力量和人的性格。
大自然的力量总是如此无情，上周三硬是让90次航班坠落。
也正是在那天下午，人的品质——在摸索与挣扎中——奋起反抗，应对灾难。
在这次事件中，有四个公认的英雄，其中三个有幸活下来解释他们的英勇行为。
唐纳德厄舍和尤金温沙是公园巡警直升机的队员，他们两人一次次冒着生命危险把起落架放进水中去搭救幸存者。
在电视上，他们俩并排站着，把自己的所作所为说成是分内之事。
28岁的斯库尼克是国会预算办公室职员，他说：“我从未想过自己会那样做”——指他跳下水去把一个受伤的妇女拖上岸的事迹，他又接着说：“总得有人跳下水。
”这句话成为众多英雄的口头禅，虽无新意却仍令人钦佩。
事实上，并没有谁非下水不可，但有人却真的这样做了，这也是之所以悲剧的阴霾在人们心中久久不能散去的原因。
这次灾难中最最牵动千万人心弦的当属那个起初被称为“水中人”的英雄，他秃顶，大约五十多岁的年纪。
留着大胡子，有人看到他和其他五个幸存者紧紧抓住机舱尾部。
The Man in the Waterdisasters go, this one was terrible, but not unique, certainly not among the worst of the roster of . air crashes. There was the unusual element of the bridge, of course, and the fact that the plane hit it at a moment of high traffic. Then, too, there was the location of the event. Washington, the city of form and rules, turned chaotic by a blast of real winter and a single slap of metal on metal. The jets from Washington National Airport that normally fly around the presidential monuments like hungry gulls are, for the moment, represented by the one that fell. And there was the aesthetic clash as well—blue-and-green Air Florida, the name a flying garden, sunk down among gray chunks of ice in a black river. All that was worth noticing, to be sure. Still, there was nothing very special in any of it, except death, which, while always special, does not necessarily bring millions to tears or to attention. Why, then, the shock herebecause the nation saw in this disaster something more than a mechanical failure. Perhaps because people saw in it no failure at all, but rather something successful about themselves. Here, after all, were two forms of nature in collision: the elements and human character. Last Wednesday. the elements, indifferent as ever, brought down Flight 90. And on that same afternoon, human nature—groping and struggling —rose to the occasion.3.Of the four acknowledged heroes of the event, three are able to account for their behavior. Donald Usher and Eugene Windsor, a park police helicopter team, risked their lives every time they dipped the skids into the water to pick up survivors. On television, side by side, they described their courage as all in the line of duty. Lenny Skutnik, a 28-year-old employee of the Congressional Budget Office, said: “It’s something I never thought I would do”—referring to his jumping into the water to drag an injured woman to shore. Skutnik added that “somebody had to go in the water,”delivering every hero’s line that is no less admirable for being repeated. In fact, nobody had to go into the water. That somebody actually did so is part of the reason this particular tragedy sticks in the mind.4. But the person most responsible for the emotional impact of the disaster is the one known at first simply as “the man in the water.”Balding, probably in his 50s, a huge mustache. He was seen clinging with five other survivors to the tail section of the airplane. This man was described by Usher and Windsor as appearing alert and in control. Every time they lowered a lifeline and flotation ring to him, he passed it on to another of the passengers. “In a mass casualty, you’ll find people like him.”said Windsor. “But I’ve never seen one with that commitment.”When the helicopter came back for him, the man had gone under. His selflessness was one reason the story held national attention; his anonymity another. The fact that he went unidentified gave him with a universal character. For a while he was Everyman, and thus proof (as if one needed it) that no man is ordinary., he could never have imagined such a capacity in himself. Only minutes before his character was tested, he was sitting in the ordinary plane among the ordinary passengers, dutifully listening to the stewardess telling him to fasten his seat belt and saying something about the “no smoking sign.”So our man relaxed with the others, some of whom would owe their lives to him. Perhaps he started to read, or to doze, or to regret some harsh remark made in the office that morning. Then suddenly he knew that the trip would not be ordinary. Like every other person on that flight, he was desperate to live, which makes his final act so stunning.at some moment in the water he must have realized that he would not live if he continuedto hand over the rope and ring to others. He had to know it, no matter how gradual the effect of the cold. He felt he had no choice. When the helicopter took off with what was to be the last survivor, he watched everything in the world move away from him, and he let it happen.there was something else about our man that kept our thoughts on him, and which keeps our thoughts on him still. He was there, in the essential, classic circumstance. Man in nature. The man in the water. For its part, nature cared nothing about the five passengers. Our man, on the other hand, cared totally. So age-old battle began again in the Potomac. For as long as that man could last, they went at each other, nature and man; the one making no distinctions of good and evil, acting on no principles, offering no lifelines; the other acting wholly on distinctions, principles and, perhaps, on faith.it was he who lost the fight, we ought to come again to the conclusion that people are powerless in the world. In reality, we believe the opposite, and it takes the act of the man in the water to remind us of our true feelings in this matter. It is not to say that everyone would have acted as he did, or as Usher, Windsor and Skutnik. Yet whatever moved these men to challenge death on behalf of their fellows is not peculiar to them. Everyone feels the possibility in himself. That is the enduring wonder of the story. That is why we would not let go of it. If the man in the water gave a lifeline to the people gasping for survival, he was likewise giving a lifeline to those who watched him.odd thing is that we do not even really believe that the man in the water lost his fight. “Everything in Nature contains all the powers of Nature.”said Emerson. Exactly. The man In the water had his own natural powers. He could not make ice storms, or freeze the water until it froze the blood. But he could hand life over to a stranger, and that is a power of nature too. The man in the water set himself against an immovable, impersonal enemy; he fought it with kindness and he held it to a standoff. He was the best we can do.。
Lesson SixText A水里那个人The Man in the Water和一般灾难相比，这次灾难非常可怕，但并不特殊，肯定也不是美国有记录的最悲惨的堕机事件之一。
As disasters go, this one was terrible, but not unique, certainly not among the worst U. S. air crashes on record.当然，不同寻常的有那座桥，还有飞机是在交通高峰期撞到桥上。
另外，还有这个事件发生的地点。
There was the unusual element of the bridge, of course, and the fact that the plane hit it at a moment of high traffic. Then, too, there was the location of the event.华盛顿这个布局合理、井然有序的城市，由于寒冬一阵突如其来的强劲气流和金属之间的剧烈碰撞而陷入混乱之中。
Washington, the city of form and rules, turned chaotic by a blast of real winter and a single slap of metal on metal.从华盛顿国家机场起飞的喷气客机，通常会像饥饿的海鸥一样绕着总统纪念建筑物飞过。
眼下，这架坠落的飞机成了它们的代表。
The jets from Washington National Airport that normally fly around the presidential monuments like hungry gulls are, for the moment represented by the one that fell.而且还有给人以美感的撞击——蓝绿相间的佛罗里达航空公司（“佛罗里达航空公司”字面意思是“飞翔的花园”）的飞机，沉入了黑色的河流中，被灰色的巨大冰块所包围。
The Man in the Water, by Roger RosenblattOn January 13, 1982, Air Florida Flight 90 plowed into the 14thStreet Bridge in Washington, D.C., and plunged into the frigidwaters of the Potomac River. The plane hit seven vehicles, killingfour motorists and 74 passengers. Only six people survived. This isone passenger’s story.As disasters go, this one was terrible but not unique, certainly not among the worst on the roster of U.S. air crashes. There was the unusual element of the bridge, of course, and the fact that the plane clipped it at a moment of high traffic, one routine thus intersecting another and disrupting both. Then, too, there was the location of the event. Washington, the city of form and regulations, turned chaotic, deregulated, by a blast of real winter and a single slap of metal on metal. The jets from Washington National Airport that normally swoop around the presidential monuments like famished gulls are, for the moment, emblemized by the one that fell; so there is that detail. And there was the aesthetic clash as well – blue-and-green Air Florida, the name a flying garden, sunk down among gray chunks in a black river. All that was worth noticing, to be sure. Still, there was nothing very special in any of it, except death, which, while always special, does not necessarily bring millions to tears or to attention. Why, then, the shock here?Perhaps because the nation saw in this disaster something more than a mechanical failure. Perhaps because people saw in it no failure at all, but rather something successful about their makeup. Here, after all, were two forms of nature in collision: the elements and human character. Last Wednesday, the elements, indifferent as ever, brought down Flight 90. And on that same afternoon, human nature – groping and flailing in mysteries of its own – rose to the occasion.Of the four acknowledged heroes of the event, three are able to account for their behavior. Donald Usher and Eugene Windsor, a park police helicopter team, risked their lives every time they dipped the skids into the water to pick off survivors. On television, side by side in bright blue jumpsuits, they described their courage as all in the line of duty. Lenny Skutnik, a 28-year-old employee of the Congressional Budget Office, said: “It’s something I never thought I would do” –referring to his jumping in the water to drag an injured woman to shore. Skutnik added that “somebody had to go in the water,” delivering every hero’s line that is no less admirable for its repetitions. In fact, nobody had to go into the water. That somebody actually did so is part of the reason this particular tragedy sticks in the mind.But the person most responsible for the emotional impact of the disaster is the one known at first simply as “the man in the water.” (Balding, probably in his 50s, an extravagant mustache.) He was seen clinging with five other survivors to the tail section of the airplane. This man was described by Usher and Windsor as appearing alert and in control. Every time they lowered a lifeline and floating right to him, he passed it on to another of the passengers. “In a mass casualty, you’ll find people like him,” said Windsor, “But I’ve never seen one with that commitment.” When the helicopter came back for him the man had done under. His selflessness was one reason the story held national attention; his anonymity another. The fact that he went unidentified invested him with a universal character. For a while he was Everyman, and thus proof (as if one needed it) that no man is ordinary.Still, he could never have imagined such a capacity in himself. Only minutes before his character was tested, he was sitting in the ordinary plane among the ordinary passengers, dutifully listening to the stewardess telling him to fasten his seat belt and saying something about the “no smoking sign.” So our man relaxed with the others, some of whom would owe their lives to him. Perhaps he started to read, or to doze, or to regret some harsh remark made in the office that morning. Then suddenly he knew that the trip would not be ordinary. Like every other person on that flight, he was desperate to live, which makes his final act so stunning.For at some moment in the water he must have realized that he would not live if he continued to hand over the rope and ring to others. He had to know it, no matter how gradual the effect of the cold. In his judgment he had no choice. When the helicopter took off with what was to be the last survivor, he watched everything in the world move away from him, and he deliberately let it happen.Yet there was something else about the man that kept our thoughts on him still. He was there, in the essential, classic circumstance. Man in nature. The man in the water. For its part, nature cared nothing about the five passengers. Our man, on the other hand, cared totally. So the timeless battle commenced in the Potomac. For as long as that man could last, they went at each other, nature and man: the one making no distinctions of good and evil, acting on no principals, offering no lifelines; the other acting wholly on distinctions, principles and one supposes, of faith.Since it was he who lost the fight, we ought to come again to the conclusion that people are powerless in the world. In reality, we believe the reverse, and it takes the act of the man in the water to remind us of our true feelings in this matter. It is not to say that everyone would have acted as he did or as Usher, Windsor, and Skutnik. Yet whatever moved these men to challenge death on behalf of their fellows is not peculiar to them. Everyone feels the possibility in himself. That is the abiding wonder of the story. That is why we would not let go of it. If the man in the water gave a lifeline to the people gasping for survival, he has likewise giving a lifeline to those who observed him.The odd thing is that we do not even really believe that the man in the water lost his fight. “Everything in Nature contains all the powers of Nature,” said Emerson. Exactly. So the man in the water had his own natural powers. He could not make ice storms or freeze the water until it froze the blood. But he could hand life over to a stranger, and that is a power of nature too. The man in the water pitted himself against an implacable, impersonal enemy; he fought it with charity; and he held it to a standoff. He was the best we can do.The Man in the Water Study GuideName ___________________________ Period _____ Date ________________1. What is known about the unidentified man in the water? (Recall)2. What does the bystander, Lenny Skutnik, have in common with other heroes?(Recall)3. Why does Rosenblatt consider the man in the water a hero? (Analysis)4. What are the different category(ies) that Rosenblatt uses to classify the ‘man in thewater’?Special Focus: The Anonymous HeroWhen a rescuer’s name is not known, the heroic action stands as the only information tied to that person. Not having an identity may make these rescuers seem larger-than-life.5. How might your reaction to the story be different if the man in the water had aname?6. Why do anonymous heroes seem to be “larger-than-life”?Quick Write/Extension AssignmentWriting Challenge: Find a statement that summarizes Rosenblatt’s editorial opinion about heroes. Write a similar statement that expresses your opinions about heroes or heroism.。
themaninwater主旨
（最新版）
目录
1.引言：介绍"The man in water"的主旨
2.内容概述：详细解析"The man in water"的主旨
3.总结：总结"The man in water"的主旨及其意义
正文
"The man in water"的主旨是探讨人类对自然的依赖和与之和谐相处的重要性。
文章通过描绘一个在水中的男子，强调了人类与水的紧密联系。
水是生命的源泉，人类的生存和发展离不开水。
文章以此提醒我们，应该尊重和保护自然，与自然和谐共处。
文章还揭示了人类过度开发和污染环境所带来的危害。
水资源的短缺，水质的恶化，都给人类的生活带来了严重的影响。
这些问题需要我们共同去面对和解决。
总的来说，"The man in water"的主旨是倡导人类与自然和谐共处，强调环境保护的重要性。
第1页共1页。
