自由现金流及价值[外文翻译]
- 格式:doc
- 大小:36.50 KB
- 文档页数:7
1 外文翻译
Free cash flow and valuation
Material Source:The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements
Author: Gerald I White
The cash flow statement is indented to help predict the firm’s ability to sustain
(and increase) cash from current operation. In doing so, the statement provides more
objective information about:
A firm’s ability to generate cash flows from operating
Trends in cash flow components and consequences of invest and financing
decision Management decision regarding such critical areas as financial policy
(leverage), dividend policy, and investment for growth Neither the statement of cash
flows nor the income statement alone contains sufficient information for decision
making. (See Box 2-2 for some empirical evidence in this respect.) In come
statement and balance sheet data must be combined with cash flows for insights into
the firm’s ability to turn its assets into cash inflows, repay its liabilities, and generate
positive return to shareholders. All three financial statements are needed to value the
firm appropriately.
An important but elusive concept often used in cash flow analysis is free cash
flow. It is indented to measure the cash available to the firm for discretionary used
after making all required cash outlays. The concept is widely used by analysts and in
the fiancé literature as the basis for many valuation models. The basic elements
required it calculate FCF are available from the cash flow statement. In the, however,
the definition of FCF varies widely, depending on how one defines and discretionary
uses.
The basic definition used by many analysts is cash from operations less the
amount of capital expenditures required to maintain the firm’s present productive
capacity. Discretionary uses include growth-oriented capital expenditures and
acquisitions, debt reduction, and payments to stockholders (dividends and stock
repurchase).the larger the firm’s FCF, the healthier it is, because it has more cash
available for growth, debt payment, and dividends.
The argument for this definition is similar to Hick’s argument regarding the
computation of net income, discussed in the previous chapter .if historical cost 2 depreciation provided a good measure of the use of productive capacity; the FCF
would equal CFO less depreciation expense .However, historical cost depreciation is
arbitrary and measure the cost to replace operating capacity only by coincidence.
The obvious alternative to depreciation is the amount of capital expenditures
made to maintain current capacity, excluding capital expenditures for growth .In
practice however, it is difficult to separate capital expenditures into expansion and
replacement components. Lacking better information, all capital expenditures are
subtracted from CFO to obtain FCF.
Subtracting all capital expenditures from CFO to arrive at FCF brings the
definition of FCF closer to the one used in definition of FCF closer to the one used
in finance valuation models .In these models, required outflows are defined as well
as capital expenditures necessary to finance the firm’s growth opportunities .Growth
opportunities are defined as those in which the firm can make “above-normal”
returns .It is difficult to determine a priori the amount of capital expenditures
required to maintain growth and the discretionary portion of these expenditures;
pragmatically, FCF is generally measured as CFO less capital expenditures.
Valuation models do, however, differ as to whether FCF is measured as FCF
available to the firm or as FCF
available to equity shareholders. In the former case, required payments do not
include outlays for interest and debt. In the latter case, they do. Thus, for FCF to the
firm, one cannot use reported CFO (less capital expenditures) because CFO includes
outlays for interest expense. We return to this issue later in this chapter. In Chapter
19, we elaborate on the differing definitions of FCF and their implications for
valuation model.
Relationship of income and cash flows
When periodic financial statements are prepared, estimates of the revenues
earned and expenses incurred during the reporting interval are required. As
discussed in the previous chapter, these estimates require management judgment and
are subject to modification as more information about the operating cycle become
available. Accrual accounting can therefore be affected by management’s choice of
accounting policies and estimates. Furthermore, accrual accounting by itself fails to
provide adequate information about the liquidity of the firm and long-term solvency.
Some of these problems can be alleviated by the use of the cash flow statement in