骨折内固定的失效
- 格式:ppt
- 大小:3.23 MB
- 文档页数:70
四肢骨折内固定物断裂或失效的临床分析作者:吐鲁洪.艾力买买提吐逊.依明来源:《特别健康·下半月》2013年第11期【摘要】目的:对四肢骨折内固定物断裂或失效原因进行分析,同时总结治疗方法。
方法:选择于2012年8月-2013年9月在我院接受治疗的内固定物发生断裂或失效的四肢骨折患者的51例,分析内固定物断裂或失效原因,并且进行针对性的治疗。
结果:临床研究发现造成四肢骨折内固定物断裂或失效原因主要包括材料因素、患者因素以及医源性因素等三方面,患者通过针对性的治疗,随访发现患者的愈合情况较好,关节的功能得到显著的恢复。
结论:多种因素会造成四肢骨折内固定物断裂或失效,针对引起内固定物断裂或失效的原因进行针对性的预防;一旦发生内固定物断裂或失效,及时有效的治疗对于预后具有十分重要的作用。
【关键词】四肢骨折;内固定物断裂或失效;原因分析;临床治疗【中图分类号】R 8 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1003-8183(2013)11-0068-02〖HJ1mm〗在临床骨科中,四肢骨折最为常见多发,其中上肢骨折以肱骨骨折、尺骨骨折最为常见,下肢骨折以股骨骨折、胫腓骨骨折最为常见。
四肢骨折若不及时进行治疗,不仅影响患者的正常生活、造成患者生活质量下降,甚至可能会引起严重的后遗症[1];内固定手术在四肢骨折的治疗中应用广泛,且取得了令人满意的临床效果,然后内固定手术存在内固定物断裂或失效的可能性而影响骨折的预后,因此分析四肢骨折内固定物断裂或失效原因并加以预防具有十分重要的临床意义。
本文选择于2012年8月-2013年9月在我院接受治疗的内固定物发生断裂或失效的四肢骨折患者的51例作为研究对象,旨在对四肢骨折内固定物断裂或失效原因进行分析,同时总结治疗方法,具体信息如下。
1 一般资料与方法1.1一般资料:51例患者通过临床症状、X线诊断检查确诊为四肢骨折。
患者年龄介于11-59岁之间,平均年龄(34.7±12.3)岁;骨折原因:交通意外事故所致19例,体育运动所致12例,坠跌所致10例,工伤所致7例,其他原因所致3例;其中15例肱骨骨折,14例尺骨骨折,12例股骨骨折,10例胫腓骨骨折。
两种翻修方法治疗股骨干骨折术后内固定失效的疗效比较黄尊贤;林达生;余爱玉;章鹏;练克俭【摘要】Objective To compare the efficacy of plate combined with allograft bone plate ( PWBP) and interlocking intramedullary nails ( IIN) to treat failed plating for femoral shaft fractures .Methods Thirty-eight patients who failed plating for femoral shaft fractures were divided into two groups according to their revision surgery , 18 patients were treated with PWBP , while the other 20 patients were treated with IIN .The operation time , volume of bleeding during operation , fracture union time , complications and the HSS scores between two groups were compared .Results All patients were followed up for 12~18 months.There were no significant differences between two groups in opera-tion time and volume of bleeding (P>0.05).There was significant difference between two groups in fracture healing time (P<0.05),which was 13~18 (16.8 ±2.7) weeks in PWBP group and 10~18 (14.3 ±3.8) weeks in IIN group.The HSS scores of two groups in last follow-up had significantly improvement compared with preoperation in both groups(P<0.05), compared with each other, there was no significant difference (P>0.05).One patient in PWBP group occurred quadriceps adhesion , after the release surgery and continuous CPM training , the patient ob-tained a satisfactoryoutcome .Two patients with massive bone defect in IIN group occurred nonunion , and both of them got fracture healing after reoperation by PWBP .Conclusions Both of PWBP and IIN for treatment of failed platingfor femoral shaft fractures can obtain satisfactory effects .IIN can get shorter fracture healing time .However , for those cases with massive bone defect before operation , treating with IIN have risk of nonunion .%目的:比较钢板结合异体骨板(PWBP)固定与交锁髓内钉(IIN)固定治疗股骨干骨折术后内固定失效的临床疗效。