Buffett sharp sayings to raise oil prices is a regression - based one meter sunshine

  • 格式:doc
  • 大小:3.22 KB
  • 文档页数:2

"Warren" Buffett (data)
51bcyl.com
when you increase the price of oil, which is a tax increase; the only difference
is that, the tax is handed over to the OPEC (organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries), but it to consumers and the role of massive tax hike is the same. And
in a certain sense, tax increases on the bottom of consumers greater blow, as a step
backward. OPEC has just increased we ask it to pay a tax, if oil prices rose to $20
a barrel, and you are importers, add up to 10000000 barrels a day, or $200000000.
No doubt, this will have an impact on the economy.

is the correct answer is, with the passage of time to reduce the use of oil. Starting
from this direction, we can take a variety of measures. We don't want to pay large
sums of Taxation, I mean every force the United States citizens in the gas station
to OPEC and other oil-producing countries to pay huge taxes. Method to get rid of
this burden is to reduce the use of oil.

I don't think shrink its balance sheet has much significance. Buy $600000000000 of
securities is one thing, to sell it is another matter, that is the Wall Street to
do. But I think, we have in the two aspects of fiscal policy and monetary policy have
made tremendous efforts. Our federal budget deficit of 10% of GDP. This is a fiscal
stimulus. As long as the consumption of each element is not through borrowing or print
money to the dollar, it is a kind of stimulation, no matter what its name.

so I think, the normal regeneration ability has been overestimated. Using the wrong
once fiscal and monetary policy, will be messed up. Economic recovery is a major factor
in continuous process, will be like Steve · Jobs (Steve Jobs) as the launch
of new products hitherto unknown.
5188bc.com
---- a few days ago, the famous master of investment, Berkshire Hathaway, head of
· Warren · Buffett had an interview with CNBC, then the United States
domestic consumption will weaken the prospects for economic recovery, so the
comments.

"股神"巴菲特(资料图)
当你提高油价,这也是一种加税;唯一的不同之处在于,这个税收是交给(石油输出国组织)
欧佩克,但它对消费者所起的作用和大规模加税是一样的。并且在一定意义上,加税对底层
消费者的打击更大,是一种倒退。欧佩克刚刚增加我们向它缴纳的税收,如果油价上涨到20
美元一桶,而你是进口商,1000万桶加起来的话,一天就是2亿美元。毫无疑问,这会对经
济产生影响。

正确的答案是,随着时间的推移减少对石油的使用。从这个方向出发,我们可以采取多种措
施。我们不想支付大笔征税款,我是指每天强迫美国市民在加油站向欧佩克及其他产油国支
付大额税收。摆脱这一负担的方法就是减少石油的使用量。

我不认为缩减资产负债表有太大意义。买进6000亿美元的证券是一回事,卖掉它则是另一回
事了,那是华尔街要做的事情。但是我认为,我们已经在财政政策和货币政策两方面都做出
了巨大努力。我们的联邦预算赤字占GDP的10%。这是一种财政刺激。只要消费每一元不是
通过借款或印钞而来的美元,那就是一种刺激,不论其名义是什么。

所以我认为,资本主义的正常再生能力已被过高估计了。一旦用错了财政和货币政策,就会
把事情弄的一团糟。经济复苏持续过程中的一个重大因素,将在于像史蒂夫·乔布斯
(Steve Jobs)那样推出前所未有的新产品。

----日前,著名投资大师、伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司掌门人沃伦·巴菲特接受
CNBC专访,就美国国内消费意愿减弱、经济复苏前景等问题进行了点评。
本文由2168bet.com翻译