观后感

  • 格式:docx
  • 大小:116.58 KB
  • 文档页数:5

The review of mock court

The mock court is my first time to participate in the course of about

legal practice, feel fresh, the atmosphere of the moot court also quite active,

the following are my thoughts for the moot court. This course is talk about

The defendant Shao Dingguo along with fellow villager wang, so zhu, Wang

Jinshui dealt with by (all), after prior to consult, carrying daggers a and

crime tools such as tape, on the evening of October 8, 2000 to 10 PM

residences in this city town taoyuanxincun road, stopped by li gang santana

taxi to drive to the city to the north side of the city residences zhenjiang city

hotel alley, Shao Ding with li gang stop pretending to check out, at this point,

wang next station on the outside of the driver's seat, then four per capita took

out a dagger, respectively, in the place such as li gang, neck, waist, with the

complicity, hand, grab li gang, the waist type 2588 Siemens mobile phone

one (1729 yuan) and driving on the stage of RMB 100 yuan, when li gang

against fleeing, the defendant Shao Dingguowang, and in the waist and left

arm fled the scene after the stab a knife. Shortly after, the public security

organ shall, from the defendant Shao Dingguo recovered, cash 110 yuan, the

dagger 1 (temporary) at our hospital. Clear the above facts, evidence

sufficient enough to that. We think the defendant Shao Dingguo colluding

with others, using violence, grab a taxi driver on the taxi money, its behavior according to article two hundred and sixty-three of the criminal law of the

People's Republic of China, a robbery, as a serious discipline, safeguard

citizens' legal property rights and personal rights from infringement, on the

basis of the criminal procedure law of the People's Republic of China the

provisions of article one hundred and forty-one, to Sue, please punish

according to law.

Moot court trial procedure in court is roughly divided into the trial, the

court investigation, court debate and trial four stages. Before the hearing, the

court clerk also simply introduces the details of a case, to help us better

understanding and the understanding of the moot court. After introducing the

clerk to finish the case, then basically according to the trial of civil lawsuit

procedure to go. In preparation for the trial, the moot court on the trial

procedure of civil action, there is no big discrepancy, summon the parties

and notify the other participants in the proceedings in court to participate in

litigation; After, before the clerk read court proceedings, the judge and judge

one after another into the chamber and ascertain whether or not the parties

and other participants in the proceedings to appear in court, declared court

procedures such as discipline and no big problem. Court investigation stage,

the investigation mainly includes two contents: one is the statement; Second, 2 it is to present evidence and cross-examination. In the moot court, a party

both sides attach great importance to this part, and the witness was a lot of

questions, I think this is the most wonderful in the moot court a stage. Court

debate stage, the court debate is in a collegial panel under the auspices of the

parties and their agents AD litem, according to court investigation stage to

find out the facts and evidence, to clarify their own opinions and standpoints,

each other words dispute lawsuit. Case review and judgment, and this is the

last stage of the trial, the collegial panel according to have to find out the

facts and evidence, in accordance with the law and policy, distinguish

between right and wrong, clear responsibility, decision and declare the

verdict, so as to solve a civil dispute between the parties. It is worth

mentioning here, when the presiding judge said to both parties agree with

reconciliation, the parties agree to settle but after the failure of the settlement

to the trial case in court sentenced verdict. About the moot court compared

with real court, because I am not to experience a real court, can only make

simple comments here. Much more from the procedural perspective, in

addition to this is the case introduction, basically consistent with real court

procedures, and there are no big deviation. According to our country civil

procedure law, in order to guarantee the witness testimony provided by the

authenticity and objectivity, the witness shall not be heard in court; When asked the witness, other witnesses shall not be present. In the moot court, the

people are sitting at the back of the gallery, so when bailiffs take the witness

in court is from the public gallery after court, rather than from the court was