绩效评估考核(Performance appraisal and assessment)The so-called performance appraisal, is through the system method and principle to assess and measure employees in the work of the behavior and effect. The results can affect the staff salary adjustment, bonuses and job rise and fall, career design and many other vital interests. The ultimate goal is to improve the performance of employees, while achieving business goals, improve employee satisfaction and future sense of accomplishment, and ultimately to achieve "win-win" development of enterprises and individuals". But it is also a "double-edged sword", well used to maximize the enthusiasm of employees and tap the potential of employees; on the contrary, it will undermine employees, and bring negative impact on enterprise development. The following 10 years of work experience, we should talk about the current situation and existing problems of enterprise staff performance appraisal, as well as suggestions for effective performance appraisal.First, the correct management idea of performance appraisal has not been successfully implanted in EnterprisesTo carry out performance appraisal work, the first question is why we should carry out performance appraisal work. This problem is not clear, and it will inevitably lead to blind performance appraisal. To carry out performance appraisal, the core problem is to achieve the strategic goal of the enterprise. Enterprises in the implementation of the performance appraisal, it is necessary to do a good job of propaganda and training, but the training and publicity if there is no real intention to highlight the performance appraisal, performance appraisal can not let employees understand very well, so the performanceappraisal is very difficult to achieve the goal.But in many enterprises, performance management is only senior managers in the little master, did not get a good promotion at the grassroots level, in the implementation process will inevitably lead to such problems, and some departments will think the performance appraisal is the human resources department that has nothing to do with other departments within the enterprise. At the same time, in the performance evaluation system design, the pursuit of one step in the design of indicators, without considering the actual situation of the enterprise, then some of the assessment will be difficult to achieve good results in actual operation.Two, the assessment indicators are primary and secondary, and the design is not reasonable enoughPerformance appraisal is a scientific measurement and evaluation of employees' job performance with various techniques and methods to meet the needs of personnel selection, allocation and training, as well as organizational change and development. There is no doubt that performance appraisal is a work, and it is a highly technical work. Therefore, the performance evaluation of the program design and formulation of a high demand. Normally, we are used to complete the mission, from the perspective of organization development, to design and establish evaluation scheme, and the scheme is the result of some cover and contain everything, non quantitative indicators were artificially "quantified", the "quantitative index" ready to accept either course caused by the examiners and examinees were at a loss.Three, the implementation of the organization is not enoughAmerican management scientist Larry Idy and Ram Charan in "execution: put forward how to complete the task of learning" in the book: not because of business failure often take the wrong strategy, but because of the good strategy is not performed correctly, ineffective implementation is the real cause of business failure.Business strategy and planning are important, but only execution can make them potentially useful. A lack of executive power of enterprise will make it work out the strategy and eventually become a mere scrap of paper, so is the performance appraisal. A good assessment system can not be carried out well, but it is also a waste of effort. There is a process to realize the strategic goal of an enterprise. The concrete process is execution, and executive ability is the ability to change the strategic vision into reality. The executive power of an enterprise is determined by three key factors, namely strategy, personnel and operation process. The effective implementation of performance appraisal also needs the coordination of personnel and the selection of the method of implementation and the process control.The author knows from many enterprises,More and more workers and even some executives believe that the performance appraisal is a kind of form, not to play its due role in the human face, not essential; performance appraisal is so feeble. The author believes that the main reason for thisdecline in the execution may be: (1) performance evaluation related to inadequate training; (2) the performance appraisal is not high-level practical support; (3) the performance appraisal index itself is unreasonable, contributed to the subjectivity and uncontrollable sex; (4) effect interpersonal relationship; (5) subordinate departments, the lack of effective communication mechanism; (6) "to advance inertia and culture to the people".Four, performance appraisal results and rewards and punishments are not equalFor enterprises, performance management is a part of corporate culture, fair and scientific performance appraisal can optimize its organizational structure, improve the overall performance, performance management for employees, create a positive work environment, through the performance appraisal, the staff to correctly understand their own advantages and disadvantages, and the development direction of the self correction, so as to get more opportunities and greater development performance.But at present, many enterprise managers regard performance appraisal as the task and requirement of the enterprise or superior. Therefore, in the process of assessment, the work attitude is not serious, the examination form is unitary, and the work is done carelessly. After that, the performance appraisal results are shelved. On the whole, performance appraisal results will have little impact on the final pay of the person being evaluated and the promotion of the future position. The intensity of punishment is not consistent withthe results of performance appraisal, to give material and spiritual rewards for the performance of employees are not significant, employee punishment for poor performance is not enough, this will inevitably lead to employees' work enthusiasm is not high, thus losing the purpose of the performance appraisal. In dealing with the assessment results on the one hand to ensure the fairness and justice, on the other hand also from the human point of view, considering the differences in temperament of employees, take individual mode of communication, the performance feedback to be assessed, and help them to find causes analysis, the result is good or bad, so as to arouse by re assessment of the rise of hope, to establish confidence in the work, and they help enterprises grow together and progress.。