人狗大战

五年级作文写人：人狗大战
今天下午，我刚回到学校准备早读时。

发现学校的操场上，有一条流浪狗。

我想校园里怎么有流浪狗呢？正想着，突然，我看见我们校园里的保安大叔怎么拿着一只有手臂这么粗的棍子呢？我继续看，原来，我们的保安大叔是在打狗。

什么打狗？我大吃一惊。

半信半疑的望外看，情不自禁的说：“真的在打狗，我顿时吃惊起来。

”心里暗暗的想：“阿弥托佛，希望上帝能保佑这个可怜的流浪狗。

”
可是，保安大叔见打不过流浪狗，又叫了几位巡警一起打流浪狗。

后来，经过这几位四肢发达的年轻人一打，这个年老病哀的流浪狗已经勉勉一息了，它躺在地上大口大口的呼吸，好像快要逝世了一样，保安大叔走后，这几个巡警好像很讨厌这个已经勉勉一息流浪狗，又狠很的踢了它一脚，流浪狗可怜的死去啦，巡警把这个流浪狗尸体拖了出去。

人狗大战结束了。

可是，我的心久久没有平静下来，因为人有生命，难道动物们就没有生命吗？如果那几位巡警是这个流浪狗的话，你希望人类打你吗？我知道如果是这样的话，你肯定希望人类对你好，决不希望人类打你。

我希望建国60周年的改变能使我们人类成为温柔的，有爱心的中国人！
让我们行动起来，不要再次让一个稀有的动物灭绝，让明天的世界变的更美好！。

day23python学习类⼈狗⼤战⾯向过程 VS ⾯向对象⾯向过程的程序设计的核⼼是过程（流⽔线式思维），过程即解决问题的步骤，⾯向过程的设计就好⽐精⼼设计好⼀条流⽔线，考虑周全什么时候处理什么东西。

⾯向过程优点是：极⼤的降低了写程序的复杂度，只需要顺着要执⾏的步骤，堆叠代码即可。

缺点是：⼀套流⽔线或者流程就是⽤来解决⼀个问题，代码牵⼀发⽽动全⾝。

⾯向过程优点是：解决了程序的扩展性。

对某⼀个对象单独修改，会⽴刻反映到整个体系中，如对游戏中⼀个⼈物参数的特征和技能修改都很容易。

缺点：可控性差，⽆法向⾯向过程的程序设计流⽔线式的可以很精准的预测问题的处理流程与结果，⾯向对象的程序⼀旦开始就由对象之间的交互解决问题，即便是上帝也⽆法预测最终结果。

于是我们经常看到⼀个游戏⼈某⼀参数的修改极有可能导致阴霸的技能出现，⼀⼑砍死3个⼈，这个游戏就失去平衡。

了解⼀些名词：类、对象、实例、实例化类：具有相同特征的⼀类事物(⼈、狗、⽼虎)对象／实例：对象就是具体的拥有准确属性值的⼀些变量具体的某⼀个事物（隔壁阿花、楼下旺财）实例化：类——>对象的过程（这在⽣活中表现的不明显，我们在后⾯再慢慢解释）实例化：从⼀个类中创造⼀个具体的对象的过程初识⾯向对象类的最基本形式class Person: #类名有两个作⽤country = '中国'#静态属性、数据属性def walk(self): #动态属性、函数属性、⽅法print('walk')1.属性引⽤在静态属性中的操作print(Person.country) #静态属性的查看print(Person.walk)Person.role = '⼈'#添加⼀个新静态属性Person.country = '印度'#修改⼀个新静态属性静态属性注意：在静态属性中的内容不能⽤下边这两种⽅法来处理，会报错#Person.__dict__['country']='印度'#Person.__dict__['love']='beautiflgirl'del Person.role #删除⼀个静态属性print(Person.__dict__)print(Person.walk()) #报错少self参数Person.__dict__['country'] = '印度'#报错不能改变print(Person.__dict__['country'])print(Person.country)实例化p = Person()print(p) #Person的对象class Person: #类名有两个作⽤country = '中国'#静态属性、数据属性def__init__(self,life_value,aggr,name,job): #初始化⽅法#self = {'lv':life_value}self.lv = life_value #属性，对象属性self.aggr = aggr = nameself.job = jobdef walk(self): #动态属性、函数属性、⽅法print('%s is walking'%)# # p = Person() #如何让对象拥有具体的属性# p = Person(1000,2,'⾦⽼板','boss') #如何让对象拥有具体的属性print(p.__dict__) 这种⽅法可以查看所有的属性，以键值对的形式存在# p.walk() # Person.walk(p) #调⽤⾥边的walk函数# print(p.lv) #Person的对象的属性查看# print(p.aggr) #Person的对象# p.sex = 'lady_boy' #添加⼀个属性直接加# print(p.sex)# p.sex = 'girl' #属性的修改，直接修改# print(p.sex)# del p.sex #属性删除⽤p.__dict__⽅法做的增删改查操作# print(p.__dict__)# print(p.__dict__['lv']) #查看# p.__dict__['lv'] = 998 #对象名.__dict__中的属性值可以被修改# print(p.__dict__['lv'],p.lv)# p.__dict__['sex'] = 'lady_boy' #对象名.__dict__中的属性值可以增加# print(p.__dict__,p.sex)# p.__dict__.pop('sex') #对象名.__dict__中的属性值可以被删除# print(p.__dict__)#实例化 ——类名(参数)#构造⽅法：造对象#初始化__init__：给这个⾚裸裸的对象添加⼀些属性 __init__#返回了⼀个初始化之后的对象#__init__⽅法：初始化⽅法，可以没有。

小狗大战蒙面人_300字
小狗历险回到了家，妈妈把它抱在温暖的
怀抱中，对小狗说：“你没事吧，妈妈好担心啊！”小狗说：“没事的，妈妈。

”
傍晚时，一个身穿黑衣的蒙面人不知用了
什么办法，进了小狗的家。

小狗看到了，穿上
铠甲，拿上银剑，向蒙面人走去。

蒙面人看到，就跟小狗保持一段距离，防止被它砍到。

小狗
快速地向蒙面人跑去准备砍下去，可蒙面人却
躲过了。

小狗的银剑砍到地板上，这个声音，
惊动了妈妈和爸爸。

它们看到小狗与蒙面人在
激烈地搏斗，便心中为小狗加油着。

小狗也用
它的银剑猛劈过去，蒙面人可吃不了这一刀，
只得灰溜溜地逃走了。

这下，小狗脱了铠甲，与爸爸妈妈一起去
睡觉。

早上，妈妈看见大树上贴着小狗的照片。

原来，这件事传了出去，被宣传队看见了，就
把它的照片贴在树上。

妈妈爸爸高兴极了，妈
妈答应小狗实现一个有意义的愿望。

这下子，
蒙面人吃了大亏，再也不敢兴风作浪了。

大家都很喜欢这只勇敢的小狗。

人狗大战过程作文英语Title: The Epic Battle Between Man and Dog。

In the annals of history, there exists a tale of epic proportions, a clash between two forces that shook the very foundation of civilization: the battle between man and dog. This conflict, rooted in ancient rivalries and primal instincts, unfolded in a crescendo of fury and valor, leaving an indelible mark on the tapestry of time.The genesis of this feud lies in the intertwined destinies of humans and canines, forged millennia ago when our ancestors first crossed paths with these loyal yet wild creatures. Initially, the bond between man and dog was one of symbiosis, with dogs aiding humans in hunting and protection in exchange for scraps and shelter. However, as societies evolved and civilizations flourished, this relationship grew increasingly complex.As humans asserted their dominance over the naturalworld, dogs found themselves relegated to the role of domestic companions, their wild instincts suppressed by the constraints of civilization. Yet, beneath their docilefaçade, the primal essence of the canine spirit smoldered, waiting for the spark that would ignite the flames of rebellion.The catalyst for the conflict came in the form of a perceived injustice, a grievance that festered in the hearts of dogs across the land. Denied the freedoms oftheir ancestors, confined to leashes and boundaries, they yearned for liberation. And so, a charismatic leader emerged from their midst, rallying the disenfranchised canines under a banner of defiance.Meanwhile, humans, blinded by their own hubris, failed to recognize the growing discontent within their midst. Oblivious to the rumblings of dissent, they continued to assert their dominance, heedless of the consequences.The first skirmishes of the war were small and scattered, mere echoes of the cataclysmic conflict thatwould soon engulf both sides. Dogs, emboldened by their newfound sense of unity, launched raids on human settlements, striking fear into the hearts of their former masters. Conversely, humans, shocked by the audacity of their canine adversaries, responded with brute force, unleashing their most formidable weapons in a desperate bid to maintain control.As the conflict escalated, both sides suffered heavy losses. Cities lay in ruins, ravaged by the indiscriminate fury of war. Yet amidst the chaos and destruction, moments of compassion and camaraderie emerged, as individuals on both sides questioned the righteousness of their cause.Ultimately, it was not superior firepower or ferocity that decided the outcome of the conflict, but rather the realization that coexistence was not only possible but necessary for the survival of both species. Through diplomacy and compromise, humans and dogs forged a fragile peace, acknowledging the inherent worth and dignity of each other's existence.And so, the great war between man and dog came to an end, not with the triumph of one side over the other, but with the recognition that true strength lies not in dominance, but in mutual respect and understanding. And though scars of the conflict may linger, they serve as a reminder of the folly of pride and the enduring power of compassion.。