CET-6阅读技巧阅读理解部分的比例调整为35%，时间40分钟，其中，仔细阅读理解时间25分钟，占25%，含篇章阅读理解（包括2篇文章10道多项选择题）和篇章词汇理解或短句问答（一篇文章，考法是15选10的选词填空或简答)两个小部分；快速阅读理解占10%，要求考生在15分钟内完成一篇1200字左右的文章（相当于原先阅读体系中四篇文章长度的总和），题目较灵活，包括是非判断、句子填空或多项选择。
在新六级阅读中，题型增加，题量加大，速度要求加快。
因此，如何提高阅读速度和效率就成为决胜六级考试阅读理解题的关键。
要想提高阅读速度和效率，最直接、最有效的方法就是掌握一些解题技巧。
一、基本功扎实是解题技巧的根本1、词汇量是基础此处的词汇包括基础词汇和六级核心词汇。
词汇是语言的基石，是文章的最基本单元，没有一定的词汇量作基础，提高并掌握阅读技巧就无从谈起。
一是必须牢牢掌握六级英语考试大纲规定的词汇。
二是要灵活运用、不应死记硬背。
英语中的一词多义现象很普遍，同一单词在不同语境下会有不同的意思，所以考试吧建议大家，可以通过阅读文章，把词汇放在语境之中来巩固词汇。
例如：大家很熟悉的matter一词在不同的场合表达不同的意义：It's an important ma tter.（这事很要紧。
）The article is full of matter.（这篇文章内容丰富。
）It is a matter of no laughing.（这个问题可不是开玩笑。
）此外，printed matter的意思是“印刷品”。
因此，在记忆单词时一定要灵活。
三是不应该盲目根据已掌握的词根词缀来推测单词。
当遇到不熟悉的词根词缀（甚至熟悉的也如此），并且通过上下文发现自己猜测的好像也不太和文章相关的情况下，一定要动手查字典核实。
例如，2002年六级阅读考到一篇关于大学生应该收到泛泛教育的话题，其中18题的D the importance of a broad education should not be overlooked，许多学生看到overlooked该单词时，会根据已有的词根词缀拆分单词的方法，讲“over-”前缀理解为“过度过多”从而将overlooked理解为“高看的”导致和正确选项擦肩而过。
六级英语阅读理解解题小技巧六级英语阅读理解解题小技巧大学英语的阅读理解是六级考试中的重点部分，有一些解题小技巧可以帮助我们做好阅读理解部分。
为此店铺为大家带来大学英语六级阅读理解部分的解题技巧。
大学英语六级阅读理解解题技巧第一，一切都要以真题为主导。
就是以我们过去考过的，新六级和新四级真题为主导。
因为真题能非常好地告诉我们一个方向，技巧会通过真题，大家可以总结出来。
英语六级考试就是考一个表层的信息，即本来这个单词这样一个表达意思，那可能到选项里是另外一个单词来表达，但意思是一样的。
就是说它不需要进行推导的，所以说你为什么多想就会选错，因为你选了一个推导项。
而事实上只要选择一个表层信息就可以了。
所以大家在做题的过程当中，切记的一点就是，在四、六级阅读考试当中不要进行推导，更多地只是以文章信息为主导来选择一个原文的信息或者是同义改写的信息就可以了。
这样一般就不会选错了。
四、六级阅读考试以细节题为主导，选择答案时不要进行推导，更多地只是以文章信息为主导来选择一个原文的信息或者是同义改写的信息，以提高选项的正确率。
相信很多同学都遇到这样的问题，明明4个选项，排除了A和B，剩下了C和D，该是C 的时候总是选的D，那么原因是这样的，为什么我们四、六级考试的时候，你总会感觉这个是对的，但是多想起来就会选错。
原因是四、六级考试主要还是以细节题为主导，所谓的细节题呢就是它考的是文章的一些细节信息，并不对文章的细节做一个引申或是延续。
第二，通过题目确定答案所在位置，采取局部定位阅读法，做到即确准又提高做题速度。
我们考试的时候阅读理解的确是时间不够，那么四、六级考试改革后呢，一篇文章只能是8分钟的时间，而通常情况下要读上一篇300-500字的文章，至少需要大概10分钟左右。
所以说在考试中，四、六级考试说白了就是拼个速度问题。
那么如何能够更好地去做完这个阅读，还能做得很准确，阅读理解的第一步就是什么，就是先局部去找这个题目答案的位置。
大学英语六级长篇阅读答题技巧Into the UnknownThe world has never seen population ageing before. Can it cope?A) Until the early 1990s nobody much thought about whole populations getting older. The UN had the foresight to convene a “world assembly on ageing” back in 1982, but that came and went. By 1994 the World Bank had noticed that something big was happening. In a report entitled “Averting the Old Age Crisis”, it argued that pension arrangements in most countries were unsustainable.B) For the next ten years a succession of books, mainly by Americans, sounded the alarm. They had titles like “Young vs Old”，“Gray Dawn”and “The Coming Generational Storm”, and their message was stark (blunt): health-care systems were heading for the rocks, pensioners were taking young people to the cleaners, and soon there would be intergenerational warfare.C) Since then the debate has become less emotional, not least because a lot more is known about the subject. Books, conferences and research papers have proliferated (multiplied). International organisations such as the OECD and the EU issue regular reports. Population ageing is on every agenda, from G8 economic conferences to NATO summits. The World Economic Forum plans to consider the future of pensions and health care at its prestigious Davos conference early next year. The media, including this newspaper, are giving the subject extensive coverage.D) Whether all that attention has translated into sufficient action is another question. Governments in rich countries now accept that their pension and health-care promises will soon become unaffordable, and many of them have embarked on reforms, but so far only timidly. That is not surprising: politicians with an eye on the next election will hardly rush to introduce unpopular measures that may not bear fruit for years, perhaps decades.E) The outline of the changes needed is clear. To avoid fiscal (贝才政的)meltdown, public pensions and health-care provision will have to be reined back severely and taxes may have to go up. By far the most effective method to restrain pension spending is to give people the opportunity to work longer, because it increases tax revenues and reduces spending on pensions at the same time. It may even keep them alive longer. John Rother, the AARP’s head of policy and strategy, points to studies showing that other things being equal, people who remain at work have lower death rates than their retired peers.F) Younger people today mostly accept that they will have to work for longer and that their pensions will be less generous. Employers still need to be persuaded that older workers are worth holding on to. That may be because they have had plenty of younger ones to choose from, partly thanks to the post-war baby-boom and partly because over the past few decades many more women have entered the labour force, increasing employers，choice. But the reservoir of women able and willing to take up paid work is running low and the baby-boomers are going grey.G) In many countries immigrants have been filling such gaps in the labour force as have already emerged [ and remember that the real crunch(shortage) is still around ten years off]. Immigration in the developed world is the highest it has ever been, and it is making a useful difference. In still-fertile America it currently accounts for about 40% of total population growth, and in fast-ageing western Europe for about 90%.H) On the face of it, it seems the perfect solution. Many developing countries have lots of young people in need of jobs; many rich countries need helping hands that will boost tax revenues and keep up economic growth. But over the next few decades labour forces in rich countries are set to shrink so much that inflows of immigrants would have to increase enormously to compensate: to at least twice their current size in western Europe’s most youthful countries, and three times in the older ones.Japan would need a large multiple of the few immigrants it has at present. Public opinion polls show that people in most rich countries already think that immigration is too high. Further big increases would be politically unfeasible.I) To tackle the problem of ageing populations at its root, “old”countries would have to rejuvenate (使年轻)themselves by having more of their own children. A number of them have tried, some more successfully than others. But it is not a simple matter of offering financial incentives or providing more child care. Modern urban life in rich countries is not well adapted to large families. Women find it hard to combine family and career. They often compromise by having just one child.J) And if fertility in ageing countries does not pick up? It will not be the end of the world, at least not for quite a while yet, but the world will slowly become a different place. Older societies may be less innovative and more risk-averse (strongly disinclined to take risks) thanyounger ones. By 2025 at the latest, about half the voters in America and most of those in western European countries will be over 50—and older people turn out to vote in much greater numbers than younger ones. Academic studies have found no evidence so far that older voters have used their clout (power) at the ballot box to push for policies that specifically benefit them, though if in future there are many more of them they might start doing so.K) Nor is there any sign of the intergenerational warfare predicted in the 1990s. After all, older people themselves mostly have families. In a recent study of parents and grown-up children in 11 European countries, Karsten Hank of Mannheim University found that 85% of them lived within 25km of each other and the majority of them were in touch at least once a week.L) Even so, the shift in the centre of gravity to older age groups is bound to have a profound effect on societies, not just economically and politically but in all sorts of other ways too. Richard Jackson and Neil Howe of America’s CSIS, in a thoughtful book called “The Graying of the Great Powers”, argue that, among other things, the ageing of the developed countries will have a number of serious security implications.M) For example, the shortage of young adults is likely to make countries more reluctant to commit the few they have to military service. In the decades to 2050, America will find itself playing anever-increasing role in the developed world’s defence effort. Because America’s population will still be growing when that of most other developed countries is shrinking, America will be the only developed country that still matters geopolitically(地缘政治上).Ask me in 2020N) There is little that can be done to stop population ageing, so the world will have to live with it. But some of the consequences can be ameliorated (alleviated). Many experts now believe that given the right policies, the effects, though momentous (grave), need not be catastrophic. Most countries have recognised the need to do something and are beginning to act.O) But even then there is no guarantee that their efforts will work. What is happening now is historically unprecedented. Ronald Lee, director of the Centre on the Economics and Demography of Ageing at the University of California, Berkeley, puts it succinctly (briefly and clearly): “ We don’t really know what population ageing will be like, because nobody has done it yet.”下面我们将从如何删改原文和如何设题、解题这两个方面分析命题人的出题思路，解除六级长篇阅读的制胜之道。
英语四六级学习经验经验：六级阅读考试心得【导语】下面是作者帮大家整理的英语四六级学习经验经验：六级阅读考试心得（共6篇），希望对大家带来帮助，欢迎大家分享。
篇1：英语四六级学习经验经验：六级阅读考试心得众所周知，阅读占40分，这直接影响你的分数，一般做到30分，就稳过及格了，其他发挥再好点就可以达到75线了。
当然，现在肯定有很多人已经超越了这条线了……高手就不用提了。
作为阅读标准28分是及格线！真的，如果你没到28就说明你未达到六级考试的阅读要求。
而如何得28分呢？首先就是做好细节题。
因为细节题刚好占总题量的70％，如果你细节没问题了那28分就得到了。
其次是主观题。
说真的，这部分最难，因为很多时候答案也是摸棱两可，这就是个人能力问题了。
当然，把握中心思想这部分还是可以做对的，只要你头脑清楚！说真的，阅读分数低的原因就是你词汇不够或者你没有仔细的阅读，我当初就是犯这个毛病，所以有1个礼拜做六级阅读题未达到26分！后来从新又复习词汇，对细节处也多留意，现在基本就稳定在28-32之间。
词汇是阅读的基础，备考资料词汇复习好坏直接影响你的成绩，所以最好现在应该在重新看看词汇，这样你的阅读才能快速突破。
比如在研究火星问题的文章中有STAKE一词，当时我没反映过来，结果错了两道题目！这足以说明词汇重要性！最后，是我总结的六级阅读方法：1、看题从D-A。
因为答案是人为设置的，就是为拖你时间，所以正确答案往往是C 、D。
2、细节题。
细节题只要是看见答案中有跟文章一模一样的词或者相似就是正确答案！尤其是你对一段文章判断不清时。
【经验】会员积分怎么获得？怎么查询？积分可以如何使用？可以直接转换为现金吗？shangxuebashareba经验分享：如何挣钱shangxueba篇2：英语四六级学习经验四六级考试心得我分别在大一大二两年考出了四六级，在准备这两次考试的过程中，我收获了一部分有用的英语知识和经验，希望能够和大家分享。
