CSUG/SPE 138148 A New Method To Simultaneously Measure In-Situ Permeability and Porosity Under Reservoir Conditions: Implications for Characterization of Unconventional Gas Reservoirs X. Cui, SPE, CBM Solutions; R.M. Bustin, The University of British Columbia; R. Brezovski, B. Nassichuk, K. Glover, V. Pathi, CBM Solutions
Copyright 2010, Society of Petroleum Engineers This paper was prepared for presentation at the Canadian Unconventional Resources & International Petroleum Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19–21 October 2010. This paper was selected for presentation by a CSUG/SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
Abstract Accurate estimation of gas-in-place is crucial for successful evaluation and exploitation of unconventional gas reservoirs, such as shale gas, coalbed methane, and tight gas. However, gas effective porosity, one of the most important parameter in estimating gas in-place, is commonly measured on crushed samples of cores or cuttings at ambient pressure although many studies have shown that the porosity and permeability of reservoirs rocks decrease with increasing effective stress, and thus the pore volume/porosity measured on crushed samples at ambient (zero stress) conditions will be larger than porosity measured under in-situ reservoir stress conditions. Normally the stress-dependence of porosity is simply accounted for by a correction factor based on the linear poro-elastic deformation, which is likely an over-simplification.
In present study, we developed a new protocol for simultaneously measuring stress-dependent In-Situ Permeability and Porosity (ISPP) that provides a method for routine characterization of effective porosity and permeability under simulated reservoir conditions. Our new method can significantly reduce the uncertainties of porosity introduced by testing crushed samples under ambient conditions, testing time, and the need for good quality core samples that are usually unavailable.
Preliminary test results indicate that the stress dependence of porosity (or pore compressibility) of fine grained reservoir rocks follows a unique trend of each tested sample, which cannot be simply adjusted from ambient porosity by a universal factor. Physical and numerical sample tests suggest that our ISPP method can obtain permeability similar to the normal pressure Pulse-Decay Permeability (PDP) technique if samples are homogeneous or transversely layered along their axes. Otherwise, our ISPP method likely tests the geometrical average permeability of longitudinally layered samples instead of the weighted arithmetical average permeability tested by the PDP method.
Overall, our approach of simultaneously measuring effective porosity and permeability under reservoir conditions offers intrinsically consistent porosity-permeability data to characterize unconventional reservoirs. Our study also reveals that utilization of different methods to test samples in different orientations and different sizes is necessary to rigorously characterize the hierarchical permeability and porosity of heterogeneous and microporous unconventional reservoir rocks.
Introduction Tremendous natural gas resource exists in unconventional reservoirs including tight sands, coal seams, and gas shales. These unconventional reservoirs usually have low to extremely low permeability and their economical exploitation often requires drilling of long-leg horizontal wells and to stimulate the wells by multiple transverse hydraulic fractures. The high cost of drilling horizontal wells and multiple hydraulic fracturing makes it critical to optimally select zones for completion and drilling of laterals.
