大学英语阅读理解精选
- 格式:doc
- 大小:74.00 KB
- 文档页数:11
Passage 1
This week a settlement was reached in a lawsuit between Compassion Over Killing
(COK) and Cal-Cruz Hatcheries, Inc. in Santa Cruz, Calif. over animal cruelty and
neglect.
In 2009, an undercover investigation led by COK exposed disturbing cruelty at
Cal-Cruz Hatcheries, where millions of ducklings and chicks who would eventually
head to the slaughterhouse were processed. Hatchlings were thrown across the room
into buckets by workers, injured, mutilated and skinned alive on machinery and left to
suffer and shoved down an egg disposal chute with a high-pressure hose while they
were still alive, among other horrors.
The footage that was obtained was turned over to the Santa Cruz Animal Service
Authority (SCASA) who investigated the issue. Despite public outcry, mounting
evidence and a recommendation to prosecute from the SCASA, the Santa Cruz
District Attorney‘s Office declined to file charges under the premise that there wasn‘t
enough evidence for a criminal case.
In January, COK, represented by the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF), filed a
lawsuit arguing that the evidence obtained in the investigation constituted felony
animal cruelty in violation of California law, and the cruelty in turn constituted illegal
and unfair business practices in violation of the California Business and Professions
Code.
According to a statement from the ALDF:
The parties have issued a joint statement clarifying that this settlement resolves ―all
claims relating to an unfair business practices lawsuit based on alleged animal cruelty
at the hatchery.‖ Key points include:
“Cal-Cruz Hatcheries is no longer in operation, closed a few months ago, and has
therefore agreed to no longer own, keep possess, or have custody of any animal.‖
Hatchery owner ―Brian Collins has agreed that he will not be in any way legally
responsible for the welfare of animals in a commercial setting for five years.‖
“Notwithstanding and as a term of the settlement, Cal-Cruz and Brian Collins
expressly deny any liability or responsibility in the matter.‖
The defendants have also agreed to pay a portion of plaintiff‘s attorneys‘ fees, and,
according to a court order, Collins is permanently banned from treating animals as
depicted in COK‘s video.
1. COK is ( )
A. devoted to improving the relationship between animals and mankind
B. against cruel tortures over animals being killed
C. against killing any animal
D. in charge of fair trade of animals
2. At Cal-Cruz Hatcheries, ( ).
A. ducklings and chicks were poisoned before they were sent to the slaughterhouse
B. ducklings and chicks were raised in some buckets
C. the workers tended to get angry so they tossed ducklings and chicks across the
room
D. ducklings and chicks were ill-treated 3. What was the real reason why the Santa Cruz District Attorney‘s Office refused to
file charges against Cal-Cruz Hatcheries?
A. It was that there was public outcry.
B. It was that the evidence was still not enough.
C. It was that the office took a partial attitude in this matter.
D. The passage hasn‘t told us the reason.
4. As to the settlement reached between COK and Cal-Cruz Hatcheries, which of the
following is true?
A. Brian Collins will be in charge of the welfare of animals in a commercial setting.
B. Brian Collins openly apologized to the public and closed Cal-Cruz Hatcheries
C. Brian Collins refused to assume any responsibility in the matter.
D. Cal-Cruz Hatcheries will be closed in a few months.
2
Do you care about whales? Do you ever use the internet giant Yahoo!? Then you
should know that Yahoo! Japan is selling whale and dolphin products on its website,
including meat from endangered species.
Although Yahoo! has banned the sale of whale products on all its other sites, its
Japanese subsidiary – Yahoo! Japan – continues to sell whale products. That means
Yahoo! – through its 34% interest in Yahoo! Japan – profits from the illegal slaughter
of whales.
According to a report just issued by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), in
March 2012, Yahoo! Japan offered 249 whale products for sale – including sashimi,
bacon and canned whale meat.
The International Whaling Commission has banned commercial whaling since 1986.
Yet Japan continues to kill whales under the guise of ―scientific research‖ – even
within the boundaries of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary established by the IWC
in 1994 to protect whales.
Each year, Japan issues itself ―scientific research‖ quotas to kill some 1,000 minke,
fin, sperm, Bryde‘s and sei whales in the Antarctic and North Pacific oceans. Many of
these whales were hunted nearly to extinction and are only now rebounding from