Is human cloning wrong

  • 格式:doc
  • 大小:25.50 KB
  • 文档页数:2

Is human cloning wrong ?

Various social problems were caused by the development of

high technology. Human cloning, one of those social

problems, give rise to a hot topic about whether it is wrong

or not? Different people hold different views. As for myself,

human cloning is wrong.

Firstly, from the perspective of nature, human cloning is

destined to be impracticable. Plenty of nature resources are

non-renewable. Therefore, if human cloning thrives, people

could live much longer than before or even never die,

nature resources will quickly crock up. On the other hand, it

breaks the rule, “survival of the fittest”, which is put forward

by Darwin. The resurrection of the weak would hinder the

process of evolution.

Secondly, human cloning will give rise to social unrest. If

one day, somebody is totally identical with you, you must

eel anxious. And then, if all the people have the same

feelings with you, the whole world will on the verge of

collapse. What’s more, it’s hard for people distinguish who is

their true relative and who is not.

Finally, I also convince that human cloning has something to

do with human rights issues. Human cloning is the duplicate

of each person, but they are not born by nature. So it’s hard to define whether they are true human beings. A multitude

of human cloning are created as a carrier of cultivating

organ. Meanwhile, they are defined as true human beings.

It’s really unfair and cruel to them. However, if they are

defined as animals, it seems unreasonable.

To sum up, human cloning is absolutely wrong. Cloning

technology had better apply to other fields.