Is human cloning wrong
- 格式:doc
- 大小:25.50 KB
- 文档页数:2
Is human cloning wrong ?
Various social problems were caused by the development of
high technology. Human cloning, one of those social
problems, give rise to a hot topic about whether it is wrong
or not? Different people hold different views. As for myself,
human cloning is wrong.
Firstly, from the perspective of nature, human cloning is
destined to be impracticable. Plenty of nature resources are
non-renewable. Therefore, if human cloning thrives, people
could live much longer than before or even never die,
nature resources will quickly crock up. On the other hand, it
breaks the rule, “survival of the fittest”, which is put forward
by Darwin. The resurrection of the weak would hinder the
process of evolution.
Secondly, human cloning will give rise to social unrest. If
one day, somebody is totally identical with you, you must
eel anxious. And then, if all the people have the same
feelings with you, the whole world will on the verge of
collapse. What’s more, it’s hard for people distinguish who is
their true relative and who is not.
Finally, I also convince that human cloning has something to
do with human rights issues. Human cloning is the duplicate
of each person, but they are not born by nature. So it’s hard to define whether they are true human beings. A multitude
of human cloning are created as a carrier of cultivating
organ. Meanwhile, they are defined as true human beings.
It’s really unfair and cruel to them. However, if they are
defined as animals, it seems unreasonable.
To sum up, human cloning is absolutely wrong. Cloning
technology had better apply to other fields.