英文原文:10The Markowitz Investment Portfolio Selection ModelThe first nine chapters of this book presented the basic probability theory with which any student of insurance and investments should be familiar. In this final chapter, we discuss an important application of the basic theory: the Nobel Prize winning investment portfolio selection model due to Harry Markowitz. This material is not discussed in other probability texts of this level; however, it is a nice application of the basic theory and it is very accessible.The Markowitz portfolio selection model has a profound effect on the investment industry. Indeed, the popularity of index funds (mutual funds that track the performance of an index such as the S&P 500 and do not attempt to “beat the market”) can be traced to a surprising consequence of the Markowitz model: that every investor, regardless of risk tolerance, should hold the same portfolio of risky securities. This result has called into question the conventional wisdom that it is possible to beat the market with the “right” investment manager and in so doing has revolutionized the investment industry.Our presentation of the Markowitz model is organized in the following way. We begin by considering portfolios of two securities. An important example of a portfolio of this type is one consisting of a stock mutual fund and a bond mutual fund. Seen from this perspective, the portfolio selection problem with two securities is equivalent to the problem of asset allocation between stocks and bonds. We then consider portfolios of two risky securities and a risk-free asset, the prototype being a portfolio of a stock mutual fund, a bond mutual fund, and a money-market fund. Finally, we consider portfolio selection when an unlimited number of securities is available for inclusion in the portfolio.We conclude this chapter by briefly discussing an important consequence of the Markowitz model, namely, the Nobel Prize winning capital asset pricing model due to William Sharpe. The CAPM, as it is referred to, gives a formula for the fair return on a risky security when the overall market is in equilibrium. Like the Markowitz model, the CAPM has had a profound influence on portfolio management practice.10.1 Portfolios of Two SecuritiesIn this section, we consider portfolios consisting of only two securities, 1S and 2S . These two securities could be a stock mutual fund and a bond mutual fund, in which case the portfolio selection problem amounts to asset allocation, or they could be something else. Our objective is to determine the “best mix” of 1S and 2S in the portfolio.Portfolio Opportunity SetLet's begin by describing the set of possible portfolios that can be constructed from 1S and 2S . Suppose that the current value of our portfolio is d dollars and let 1d and 2d be the dollar amounts invested in 1S and 2S , respectively. Let 1R and 2R be the simple returns on 1S and 2S over a future time period that begins now and ends at a fixed future point in time and let R be the corresponding simple return for the portfolio. Then, if no changes are made to the portfolio mix during the time period under consideration,()()()2211111R d R d R d +++=+.Hence, the return on the portfolio over the given time period is()211R x xR R -+=, where d d x 1= is the fraction of the portfolio currently invested in 1S . Consequently, by varying x , we can change the return characteristics of the portfolio.Now if 1S and 2S are risky securities, as we will assume throughout this section, then 1R , 2R , and R are all random variables. Suppose that 1R and 2R are both normally distributed and their joint distribution has a bivariate normal distribution. This may appear to be a strong assumption. However, data on stock price returns suggest that, as a first approximation, it is not unreasonable. Then, from the properties of the normal distribution, it follows that R is normally distributed and that the distributions of 1R , 2R , and R are completely characterized by theirrespective means and standard deviations. Hence, since R is a linear combination of 1R and 2R , the set of possible investment portfolios consisting of 1S and 2S can be described by a curve in the μσ- plane.To see this more clearly, note that from the identity ()211R x xR R -+= and the properties of means and variances, we have()211R R R x x μμμ-+=, ()()222222211112R R R R R x x x x σσρσσσ-+-+=, where ρ is the correlation between 1R and 2R , Eliminating x from these two equations by substituting ()()212R R R R x μμμμ--=, which we obtain from theequation for R μ, into the equation for 2R σ, we obtain()()()()()()()222222222211212*********R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RR σμμμμσρσμμμμμμσμμμμσ--+---+--=, which describes a curve in the R R μσ plane as claimed.Notice that R σ and R μ change with x , while 1R σ, 1R μ, 2R σ, 2R μ, ρ remain fixed. To emphasize the fact that R σ and R μ are variables, let’s drop thesubscript R from now on. Then, the preceding equation for 2R σ can be written as()20202σμμσ+-=A , where A , 0μ, 20σ are parameters depending only on 1S and 2S with 0>A and 020≥σ. Indeed,(){}22222112121R R R R R R A σσρσσμμ+--= ()()(){}21212112122R R R R R R σσρσσμμ-+--=0>(the inequality holding since 11≤≤-ρ), and()()()212121121222220R R R R R R σσρσσρσσσ-+--=(again since 11≤≤-ρ). Further,()()()212112212121122220R R R R R R R R R R R R σσρσσσμσρσμμσμμ-+-++-=.Consequently, the possible portfolios lie on the curve()20202σμμσ+-=A ,0≥σ, which we recognize as being the right half of a hyperbola with vertex at ()00,μσ. (Figure 10.1).Notice that the hyperbola ()20202σμμσ+-=A describes a trade-off between risk (as measured by σ) and reward (as measured by μ). Indeed, along the upper branch of the hyperbola, it is clear that to obtain a greater reward, we must invest in a portfolio with greater risk; in other words, “no pain, no gain.” The portfolios on the lower branch ofthe hyperbola, while theoretically possible, will never be selected risk level σ, the portfolio on the upper branch with standard deviation σ will always have higher expected return (i.e., higher reward) than the portfolio on the lower branch with standard deviation σ and, hence, will always be preferred to the portfolio on the lower branch. Consequently, the only portfolios that need be considered further areFIGURE10.1 Set of Possible Portfolios consisting of 1S and 2Sthe ones on the upper branch. These portfolios are referred to as efficient portfolios. In general, an efficient portfolio is one that provides the highest reward for a given level of risk.Determining the Optimal PortfolioNow let’s consider which portfolio in the efficient set is best. To do this, we need to consider the investor’s tolerance for risk. Since different investors in general have different risk tolerances, we should expect each investor to have a different optimal portfolio. We will soon see that this is indeed the case.Let’s consider one particular investor and let’s suppose that this investor is able to assign a number ()R F U to each possible investment return distribution R F with the following properties:1.()()b a R R F U F U > if and only if the investor prefers the investment with return a R to the investment with return b R .2. ()()b a R R F U F U = if and only if the investor is indifferent to choosing between theinvestment with return a R and the investment with return b R .The functional U , which maps distribution functions to the real numbers, is called a utility functional. Note that different investors in general have different utility functionals.There are many different forms of utility functionals. For simplicity, we assume that every investor has a utility functional of the form()2σμk F U R -=,where 0>k is a number that measures the investor’s level of risk aversion and is unique to each investor. (Here, μ and σ represent the mean and standard deviation of the return distribution R F .) There are good theoretical reasons for assuming a utility functional of this form. However, in the interest of brevity, we omit the details. Note that in assuming a utility functional of this form, we are implicitly assuming that among portfolios with the same expected return, less risk is preferable.The portfolio optimization problem for an investor with risk tolerance level kcan then be stated as follows:Maximize:2σμk U -= Subject to: ()20202σμμσ+-=A . This is a simple constrained optimization problem that can be solved by substituting the condition into the objective function and then using standard optimization techniques from single variable calculus. Alternatively, this optimization problem can be solved using the Lagrange multiplier method from multivariable calculus.Graphically, the maximum value of U is the number u such that the parabolau k =-2σμ is tangent to the hyperbola ()20202σμμσ+-=A . (See Figure 10.2.The optimal portfolio in this figure is denoted by O .) Clearly, the optimal portfolio depends on the value of k , which specifies the investor’s level of risk aversion.Carrying out the details of the optimization, we find that when 1S and 2S are both risky securities (i.e.01≠R σ and 02≠R σ), the risk-reward coordinates of theoptimal portfolio O are 20241*σσ+=Ak, kA 21*0+=μμ. Since ()211R R x x μμμ-+=, it follows that the portion of the portfolio that should beFIGURE10.2 Portfolio with Greatest Utilityinvested in 1S is212*R R R x μμμμ--=. Comment We have assumed that short selling without margin posting is possible (i.e., we have assumed that x can assume any real value, including values outside the interval[0,1]). In the more realistic case, where short selling is restricted, the optimal portfolio may differ from the one just determined.EXAMPLE 1: The return on a bond fund has expected value 5% and standard deviation 12%, while the return on a stock fund has expected value 10% and standard deviation 20%. The correlation betwee n the returns is 0.60. Suppose that an investor’sutility functional is of the form 21001σμ-=U . Determine the investor’s optimal allocation between stocks and bonds assuming short selling without margin posting is possible.It is customary in problems of this type to assume that the utility functional is calibrated using percentages. Hence, if 1R ,2R represent the returns on the bond and stock funds, respectively, then()()56.3121001521=-=R F U , ()()61210011022=-=R F U . Note that such a calibration can always be achieved by proper selection of k . From the formulas that have been developed, the expected return on the optimal portfolio iskA 21*0+=μμ, where 1001=k ,()()()212112212121122220R R R R R R R R R R R R σσρσσσμσρσμμσμμ-+-++-=()()()()()()()()()()()()201240.0220121210201260.010*******+-++-= 875.21=and()()(){}21212112122R R R R R R A σσρσσμμ-+--= ()()()()(){}201240.022*********+--= 24.10=. Hence, the portion of the portfolio that should be invested in bonds is212*R R R x μμμμ--= 105107578125.26--= 3515625.3-=.Thus, for a portfolio of $1000, it is optimal to sell short $33351.56 worth of bonds andinvest $4351.56 in stocks.■ Special Cases of the Portfolio Opportunity SetWe conclude this section by high lighting the form of the portfolio opportunity set in some special cases. Throughout, we assume that 1S and 2S are securities such that21R R μμ< and 21R R σσ<. (The situation where 21R R μμ< and 21R R σσ> is not interesting since then 2S is always preferable to 1S .) We also assume that no short positions are allowed. Assets Are Perfectly Positively Correlated Suppose that 1=ρ (i.e. 1R and 2R are perfectly positively correlated). Then the set of possible portfolios is a straight line, as illustrated in Figure 10.3a.Assets Are Perfectly Negatively Correlated Suppose that 1-=ρ (i.e, 1R and 2R are perfectly negatively correlated). Then the set of possible portfolios is as illustrated in Figure 10.3b. Note that, in this case, it is possible to construct a perfectly hedged portfolio (i.e., portfolio with 0=σ).Assets Are Uncorrelated Suppose that 0=ρ. Then the portfolio opportunity set has the form illustrated in Figure 10.3c. From this picture, it is clear that starting from a portfolio consisting only of the low-risk security 1S , it is possible to decrease risk and increase expected return simultaneously by adding a portion of the high-risk security 2S to the portfolio. Hence, even investors with a low level of risk tolerance should have a portion of their portfolios invested in the high-risk security 2S . (See also the discussion on the standard deviation of a sum in §8.3.3.)One of the Assets Is Risk Free Suppose that 1S is a risk-free asset (i.e., 01=R σ) a.b.c.d. One of the Assets Is Risk FreeFIGURE 10.3 Special Cases of the Portfolio Opportunity Setμ 0μ μand put f R r =1μ, the risk-free rate of return. Further, let S denote 2S and write S σ, S μ in place of 2R σ, 2R μ. Then the efficient set is given by σσμμ⋅-+=Sf S f r r , 0>σ. This is a line in risk-reward space with slope ()S f S r σμ- and μ-intercept f r (see Figure 10.3d).10.2 Portfolios of Two Risky Securities and a Risk-Free Asset Suppose now that we are to construct a portfolio from two risky securities and a risk-free asset. This corresponds to the problem of allocating assets among stocks, bonds, and short-term money-market securities. Let 1R , 2R denote the returns on the risky securities and suppose that 21R R μμ< and 21R R σσ<. Further, let f r denote the risk-free rate.The Efficient SetFrom our discussion in §10.1, we know that the portfolios consisting only of the two risky securities 1S , 2S must lie on a hyperbola of the type illustrated in Figure 10.4. We claim that when a risk-free asset is also available, the efficient set consists of the portfolios on the tangent line through (0,f r ) (Figure 10.5). Note that f r in this figure is the μ-intercept of the tangent line through T .FIGURE 10.4Portfolio Opportunity Set for Two SecuritiesFIGURE 10.5Efficient Set as a Tangent LineFIGURE 10.6Portfolios Containing the Tangency Portfolio Dominate All OthersTo see why this is so, consider a portfolio P consisting only of 1S and 2S and let T be the tangency portfolio (i.e., the portfolio which is on both the hyperbola and the tangent line). From our discussion in §10.1, we know that every portfolio consisting of the risky portfolio P and the risk-free asset lies on the straight line through P and (0,f r ), and every portfolio consisting of the tangency portfolio T and the risk-free asset lies on the tangent line through T and (0,f r ) (Figure 10.6). Hence, from Figure 10.6, it is clear that every portfolio consisting of P and the risk-free asset is dominated by a portfolio consisting of T and the risk-free asset. Indeed, for any given risk level σ', there is a portfolio on the line through T and (0,f r ) with greater μ than the corresponding portfolio on the line through P and (0,f r ). Hence, given a choice between holding P as the risky part of our portfolio and holding T as the risky part, we should always choose T .Consequently, the efficient portfolios lie on the line through (0,f r ) and T as claimed. Note, in particular, that the efficient portfolios all have the same risky part T ; the only difference among them is the portion allocated to the risk-free asset. This surprising result, which provides a theoretical justification for the use of index mutual funds by every investor, is known as the mutual fund separation theorem. In view of this separation theorem, the portfolio selection problem is reduced to determining the fraction of an investor’s portfolio that should be invested in the risk -free asset. This is a straightforward problem when the utility functional has the form 2σμk U -=(Figure 10.7). The investor’s optimal portfolio in this figure is denoted by O . Details are left to the reader.Determining the Tangency PortfolioThe tangency portfolio T has the property of being the portfolio on the hyperbola for which the ratioσμf r - is maximal. (Convince yourself that this is so.) Hence, one method of determining the coordinates of T is to solve the following optimization problem:Maximize:σμθf r -= Subject to: ()20202σμμσ+-=A . We will determine the coordinates of T in a slightly different way, which is more easily adapted when the number of risky securities is greater than two.Recall that the efficient portfolios are the ones with the least risk (i.e., smallest σ) for a given level of expected return μ. Hence, the efficient set, which we already know is the line through (0,f r ) and T , can be determined by solving the following collection of optimization problems (one for each μ):Minimize: ()R VarFIGURE 10.7 Optimal Portfolio for a Given Utility FunctionalSubject to: []μ=R E .Let 1y , 2y , 3y be the amounts allocated to 1S , 2S , and the risk-free asset, respectively. Then the return on such a portfolio isf r y R y R y R 32211++=,and so()2222211221212y y y y R Var σσσ++=and[]32211y r y y R E f ++=μμ,where []j j R E =μ, ()j j R Var =2σ, and ()j i j i R R Cov ,=σ. Note that ()R Var does not contain any terms in 3y ! Consequently, the optimization problem can be written asMinimize: 2222211221212y y y y σσσψ++= Subject to: μμμ=++32211y r y y f ,1321=++y y y .Note that the conditions in the optimization are equivalent to the conditions()()f f f r y r y r -=-+-μμμ2211,1321=++y y y .(Substitute 1321=++y y y into the first condition.) Since the only place that 3y now occurs is in the condition 1321=++y y y , this means that we can solve the general optimization problem by first solving the simpler problemMinimize: ψSubject to: ()()f f f r y r y r -=-+-μμμ2211and then determining 3y by 2131y y y --=. Indeed, ψ will still be minimized because the required 1y , 2y will be the same in both optimization problems.The simpler optimization problem can be solved using the Lagrange multipliermethod. In general, we will haveg ∇=∇τψ and 0=g ,where ()()()f f f r y r y r g ---+-=μμμ2211 and τ is the Lagrange multiplier. The letter λ is generally reserved in investment theory for the reward-to-variability ratio ()2σμf r - and, hence, will not be used to represent a Lagrange multiplier here. Performing the required differentiation, we obtain ⎪⎪⎭⎫ ⎝⎛--⎪⎭⎫ ⎝⎛=⎪⎪⎭⎫ ⎝⎛⎪⎪⎭⎫ ⎝⎛ff r r y y 2121221212212μμτσσσσ, or equivalently, ⎪⎪⎭⎫ ⎝⎛--=⎪⎪⎭⎫ ⎝⎛⎪⎪⎭⎫ ⎝⎛ff r r z z 212122121221μμσσσσ, where112y z τ=, 222y z τ=.Note that the Lagrange multiplier τ will depend in general on μ.Now the tangency portfolio T lies on the efficient set and has the property that 03=y (i.e., no portion of the tangency portfolio is invested in the risk-free asset). Hence, the values of 1y and 2y for the tangency portfolio are given by2111z z z y +=, 2122z z z y +=, where (1z ,2z ) is the unique solution of the preceding matrix equation. Indeed, since T lies on the efficient set, we must have (1y ,2y )=2τ(1z ,2z ), and since 11321=-=+y y y , we must have ()2112z z +=τ. The risk-reward coordinates (T R σ,T R μ) for the tangency portfolio are then determined using the equations2211μμμy y TR +=, 22221221212122σσσσy y y y TR ++=, where 1y , 2y are the fractions just calculated.中文译文:第十章:Markowitz 投资组合选择模型这本书前面九个章节提出了保险和投资任一名学生应该熟悉的基本的概率理论。