英语 安乐死辩论赛正方和反方的观点

有人赞同安乐死，有人反对安乐死，还要有自己的观点Basically, i support the act of euthanasia.Everyone was born equally, and everyone was born with human rights. what's human rights stand for? it simply means the rights about life and living, that is to say, people should have the rights to decide for themselves whether to live or to die. they are masters of theirselves. for those who execute the act of euthanasia, if they operate it under the party's own willings, and through a legal and openly process, they should not be to blame.And what's more, the act of euthanasia is sort of humanitarian, especially when the party are tortured by his health condition, and it's completely hopeless at all for them to recover.of course, from optimistic and positive point of view, nobody should give up himself and end his life. but sometimes, and many times, it's just a torture for him to prolong his life, not only for himself, but also his families.1——文章来源网络，仅供参考。

1、定义：安乐死(Euthanasia）指对无法救治的病人停止治疗或使用药物，让病人无痛苦地死去。

“安乐死”一词源于希腊文，意思是”幸福”地死亡。

它包括两层含义，一是安乐的无痛苦死亡;二是无痛致死术.中国的定义指患不治之症的病人在垂危状态下，由于精神和躯体的极端痛苦，在病人和其亲友的要求下，经医生认可，用人道方法使病人在无痛苦状态中结束生命过程。

(反驳常识性、原则性的东西，用于应对无理取闹)2、安乐死如果以法律的形式确认下来，并不是之后说我们就没有作为了，我们可以另外增设完善相关的法律法规去遏制这种犯罪现象的发生，每次举措刚开始时都会或多或少有缺陷,假如就因为这些片面的原因而去全盘否定、不去实施，那么这个社会将不会再发展下去。

(反驳安乐死如果以“法律”的形式确定下来，会被利用非法剥夺他人的生命.）3、是的，生命不是只是属于一个人，也是属于社会的,因此生命需要服从社会，把有限的医疗资源支付给身患绝症、没有治疗价值的病人的做法,对于那些生活在贫困地区、因缺少医药而得不到良好治疗便死亡或残疾的人来说，同样是不公平、不人道的；实施安乐死无疑是减少社会公共负担、增大了医疗资源的利用率，更可以说是为社会集体负责与付出贡献,怎么会说是不负责的表现呢？（反驳生命权虽然是个人自由，但是同时生命也是属于社会的，承担着社会责任,所以安乐死是对社会责任不负责的表现。

）4、反驳上面问题（1）(2）（3）：作为一个人，他天然享有神圣而不可侵犯的生命权。

它是一个人拥有一切权利的源泉,生命权不受任意的侮辱、损害、践踏与剥夺，也就是说患者有自主选择生命的形式，没有人想要去结束生命,除了他是在被生命折磨不堪，想要结束生命.然后请反方重新认识一下安乐死的定义，安乐死是在“病人”“亲友”“医生”三方的同意之下，才可以实施,安乐死是个人意愿；所以就算实施救治无望是一个模糊的概念,就算未知这种疾病在将来是否被攻克，实不实施安乐死是患者的意愿，我们应该尊重他的意愿,而不是去干涉他的生命权!!！5、反驳问题（4）:这是太过绝对的说法，实施安乐死是迫不得已的做法，因此人们为了尽量避免使用这种方法，会更努力地去寻找新的医疗方法去取缔这个方法，而不是说就是使用安乐死的方法而不研究其他方法。

Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia. But the son was cut for this。

feeling helpless because he is at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing.Some people think it is right.but others dont think so.now let us listen to everyone's different opinions安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。

正如上面所示的视频所描绘的，一位晚期患病母亲病入膏肓，请求儿子实施安乐死。

但儿子且为此获罪，感到无能为力，因为他们不知道该怎么办。

这幅画确实发人深省。

它暗示，人们在对待安乐死上看法不一致。

有些人认为他是对的，但其他的不这样认为，现在让我们听听大家的不同观点赞成1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.如果一个人失去了生存能力，对社会没有了贡献，也就失去了生命的意义，减少对别人的倚赖和对社会的负担。

第一部分：反对安乐死和医助性自杀的理由1.安乐死的不法性/不道德性（wrongfulness）原文概要：安乐死就是故意地夺取一个假设没有希望的人的生命，无论是他自己还是他人的，安乐死都是夺取生命。

失误性杀害、因医疗治愈需要意外死亡或因缺乏救治手段而死亡都不是安乐死。

意识到病人几乎没有机会从持续治疗中获益之后，停止继续治疗被一些人认为是“被动性安乐死”。

这个词语是误导性的和错误的。

所谓的被动性安乐死并不是安乐死。

为什么反对安乐死？（1）从本能角度的论据：（人有求生的本能）每个人都有继续下去的自然倾向。

从日常行为到生理功能看都是这样，但安乐死侵犯了这种生存的自然目的。

安乐死侵犯了人的尊严，否认基本的人类特点。

（2）从自身利益出发的论据：死亡是最终的、不可逆转的，如果我们实施安乐死或让别人在自己身上实施安乐死，那么安乐死就包含了我们会违背自己利益的可能性。

现代医学很发达，但容错性依然很高，在此情况下，允许安乐死，我们有可能不必要送命。

以后被治愈或自愈的可能性使我们不能放弃生命而使用安乐死。

“安乐死可能性的存在是我们在有可能生存的时候却远离了生命。

”（3）从实际效果出发的论据：对大多数的医生和护士来说，他们是全心全意挽救生命的。

而安乐死变成医疗实务可能使他们不再尽力挽救生命，可能造成医护质量的全面倒退。

因而，将安乐死作为法律政策是一种滑坡。

从自愿性安乐死到没有授权的病人实施直接性的安乐死，到把非自愿安乐死作为社会政策的一部分，其间只差了一小步。

很容易逾越。

安乐死不只是死亡，是谋杀。

2.在自我抉择失去理智的时候丹尼尔·卡拉汉反对任何允许自愿性安乐死和帮助性自杀的社会政策。

他坚持认为，自我决断和仁慈（支持安乐死和自杀的两个价值观）可能是互相分离的。

当发生这种情况时，以任何理由的帮助性自杀和因无能力的非自愿安乐死就变得让人接受了。

卡拉汉反对雷切尔斯的观点：谋杀与任其死亡的区别在道德上是不相关的。

他认为这个区别是很重要的，而且终结一个生命的决定要求对意义和质量进行判断，而医生对此没有能力作出判断。

安乐死应该合法化正方辩词，一辩、二辩、三辩、四辩发言稿一辩发言稿：尊敬的评委、各位辩手，大家好！今天我们的辩题是“安乐死应该合法化”。

我作为正方的第一位辩手，我要就此发表我的看法。

首先，我认为安乐死是一种人道的行为。

对于那些身患重病、痛苦难忍的人来说，他们可能已经失去了生活的意义。

如果他们选择安乐死，那么这是一种对他们自身的尊重和关爱。

我们不能因为我们的价值观和道德观念而剥夺他们自主选择的权利。

其次，安乐死的合法化可以减轻医疗资源的压力。

在一些国家和地区，安乐死已经合法化，这样可以减轻医疗系统的负担。

对于那些病情已经无法挽救的病人来说，他们的生命延续只会消耗更多的医疗资源，而这些资源可以用来救治那些仍有希望的病人。

最后，我们不能因为道德观念而忽视人们的自主权利。

安乐死的合法化可以保护人们的自主选择权利，而不是让他们受制于他人的意志。

我们应该尊重每个人的选择，而不是强迫他们接受我们的价值观和道德观念。

总之，我认为安乐死应该合法化，这是一种人道的行为，可以减轻医疗资源的压力，并保护人们的自主选择权利。

谢谢大家！二辩发言稿：尊敬的评委、各位辩手，大家好！我是正方的第二位辩手，我要就“安乐死应该合法化”这个话题发表我的看法。

首先，我认为安乐死的合法化可以减轻病人和家庭成员的痛苦。

对于那些身患重病、痛苦难忍的病人来说，他们可能已经失去了生活的意义。

这时，如果他们选择安乐死，那么这可以让他们摆脱痛苦，从而减轻他们和家庭成员的痛苦。

这是一种人性化的行为。

其次，安乐死的合法化可以避免非法安乐死的发生。

在一些国家和地区，安乐死是非法的，但是仍有一些人选择非法安乐死。

这可能会导致一些不必要的痛苦和悲剧。

如果安乐死合法化，那么这些人就可以在合法的程序下选择安乐死，避免非法安乐死的发生。

最后，安乐死的合法化可以保护医生的权利。

在一些国家和地区，医生可能会因为帮助病人实现安乐死而面临法律风险。

这可能会让医生在面对病人的选择时感到无助和困惑。

英语安乐死辩论Good morning ,everyone ; my name is Yang .I am the first debater on positive side. Here are my opinions.1 First I will state the definaton of euthanasia,that is people who are attacked by incurable disease can’t surffer from the pains and decide to employ a humane way to end their lives without pain.2 Second, as with survival, death is a kind of human rights. When he felt happier than survival of death, he has the right to choose death, society should meet the people's needs, and give every person who is suffering incurable disease to choose the right euthanasia .So citizens have the right to choose the way of death. It is another case of freedom of choice.3 Third , for mortally ill patients, long life actually only means extend pain. For them to end their lives is a kind of happiness, It provides a way to relieve extreme pain, and this conforms to humanism.4 Fouth , this way can free up medical funds to help other people and reduce the burden of family and society. In this regard,it takes family members’ interest and supplies a lot of benefits to society.5 so according to the previous paper, we have reasons to believe that euthanasia is a proper way, not only does it respect personal dignity,but also helps with social development. And it is the performance of human civilization progress too.That’s all my ideas ,thank you。

安乐死_英语辩论第一篇：安乐死_英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurancecompanies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he isreasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“,meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allo w patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s lifemeans the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。

安乐死的看法英语作文关于安乐死的看法英语作文Directions： For this part you are allowed thirty minutes to write a composition on the topic Should Euthanasia Be Legalized? You should write no less than 150 words and base your composition on the outline （given in Chinese） below：1、有的人赞成实行安乐死2、有的人反对安乐死合法化3、我的看法。

范文：Euthanasia, a quiet and easy death, or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made the headlines frequently. Many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.As is pointed out, to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. To his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his life entails. However, the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. Is it humane, for example, that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feel guilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die? Is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis? And is it possible that euthanasia could be taken advantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes?Since the legalization of euthanasia will raise serious moral and social issues, the decision our society makes about euthanasia will undoubtedly have tremendous consequences insociety.单词：1. euthanasia：adj. 安乐死2. mercy：n. 仁慈，宽容；怜悯；幸运；善行3. headline：n. 大标题；内容提要；栏外标题；头版头条新闻4. applaud：vt. 赞同；称赞；向…喝采5. legalized：adj. 合法的6. benefit：vt. 有益于，对…有益7. terminally：adv. 处于末期症状上8. excruciating：adj. 折磨人的；使苦恼的`9. painlessly：adv. 无痛苦地，不费力地10. relief：n. 减轻，解除；安慰11. drain：n. 消耗12. sustain：vt. 维持13. legalization ：n. [法] 合法化；法律认可14. guilty：adj. 有罪的；内疚的15. diagnosis：n. 诊断16. ulterior：adj. 隐秘不明的17. criminal：adj. 刑事的；犯罪的；罪恶的18. purpose：n. 目的；用途19. moral：adj. 道德的20. issue：n. 问题21. undoubtedly：adv. 确实地，无庸置疑地22. tremendous：adj. 极大的，巨大的；惊人的23. consequence：n. 结果词组：1. point out：指出2. day and night：日以继夜3. like a vegetable：像一个植物人4. be allowed to do sth.：被允许做某事5. take advantage of：利用句子分析：To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to en d his life painlessly is a good release.1）who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”做定语修饰a terminally ill person 2）to be allowed to end his life painlessly为整句句子的主语，his life指的是a terminally ill person’s life，所以整句句子的中心意思在最后，即：to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release。

英语作文：安乐死该合法化吗英语作文：安乐死该合法化吗安乐死 Should Euthanasia Be Legalized？Directions： For this part you are allowed thirty minutes to write a composition on the topic Should Euthanasia Be Legalized？You should write no less than 150 words and base your composition on the outline （given in Chinese） below：1.有的人赞成实行安乐死2.有的人反对安乐死合法化3.我的看法。

范文：Euthanasia， a quiet and easy death，or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made the headlines frequently. Many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.安乐死，一个安静的，容易死亡，或“安乐死”，因为我们称之为最近的头条新闻频繁。

许多人都为之喝彩，并认为安乐死应该合法化。

As is pointed out， to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”， to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. To his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his life entails. However， the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. Is it humane， for example， that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feel guilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die？ Is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis？And is it possible that euthanasia could be takenadvantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes？正如所指出的'那样，实行安乐死可以造福病人和他的家人。

Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia. But the son was cut for this。

feeling helpless because he is at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing.Some people think it is right.but others dont think so.now let us listen to everyone's different opinions安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。

正如上面所示的视频所描绘的，一位晚期患病母亲病入膏肓，请求儿子实施安乐死。

但儿子且为此获罪，感到无能为力，因为他们不知道该怎么办。

这幅画确实发人深省。

它暗示，人们在对待安乐死上看法不一致。

有些人认为他是对的，但其他的不这样认为，现在让我们听听大家的不同观点赞成1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.如果一个人失去了生存能力，对社会没有了贡献，也就失去了生命的意义，减少对别人的倚赖和对社会的负担。