非洲的国家非洲有54个国家，位居各大洲之首，非洲最富裕的5个国家，是哪5个国家，最贫穷的国家呢？非洲最富裕、人均GDP最高的5个国家。
一、塞舌尔非洲最富裕、人均GDP最高的国家是塞舌尔。
2021年，塞舌尔的GDP总量为15亿美元，由于该国人口只有9.89万，所以人均GDP高达14931美元。
塞舌尔是坐落在东部非洲印度洋上的一个群岛国家，由115个大小岛屿组成。
塞舌尔全境半数地区为自然保护区，所以有“旅游者天堂”的美誉。
塞舌尔是个经济不发达，工业基础非常薄弱的国家，百姓以农渔为业。
塞舌尔风景优美，每年能吸引大量的游客来塞舌尔旅游、度假。
旅游业和渔业是塞舌尔的两大产业支柱，其中旅游业创造了塞舌尔七成以上的国内生产总值，塞舌尔人正是依靠旅游业的收入，成为了非洲人均GDP最高的国家，因此过上了相对富裕的生活。
二、加蓬非洲人均GDP第二高的国家是加蓬，GDP总量为192亿美元，人口为214万，人均GDP为8976美元。
加蓬是位于非洲中部西海岸，横跨赤道线的一个国家，国土面积为26.8万平方公里。
加蓬的资源非常丰富，主要有石油、木材、锰矿等资源。
加蓬已探明的石油储量约22亿桶。
锰矿蕴藏量2亿吨，占全球已探明储量四分之一。
铌矿储量约40万吨，占世界总储量5%。
铁矿储量8至10亿吨。
加蓬国内的森林覆盖率高达85%，森林资源非常丰富，原木储量4亿立方米。
加蓬的工矿业与制造业相对发达。
采掘业、矿业、冶金工业、林业和农副产品加工业是加蓬的支柱产业。
加蓬主要是通过对我国、美国等国出售石油、木材等资源，成为了非洲第二富裕国家。
三、赤道几内亚赤道几内亚的GDP总量为127亿美元，人口为145万，人均GDP为8745美元，非洲排名第三。
赤道几内亚位于非洲中西部，西临大西洋，国土面积为28051平方公里。
赤道几内亚矿产资源丰富，主要有石油、天然气、磷酸盐、黄金、铝矾土等资源。
赤道几内亚已探明的石油储量多达30亿桶，天然气储量375亿立方米。
Some people say that rich nations should help poor countries with their basic needs like food and education while others oppose the idea and argue that the poor nation themselves should try to improve their condition.Do you agree with the idea that rich and developed nations should help the poor nations？Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Model Answer 1:A nations’ welfare is the most crucial part of quality life for citizens in that certain country. Icompletely agree that the governments have an initial role to keep their citizens stay healthy and well-educated. This statement is supported by a numerous reason; governments’ basic responsibility and the governments’ authority. Firstly, it is noticeable that the basic responsibility of the government is to look after their society, especially for people living in under standard of life. Although it may be true that all of the nations should help each other, however, the governments should stand in the front line to guaranty their citizens’ life. In additions, every country in the world has their own income which is collected from many sources such asindividual income tax and value added tax. Hence, the government should distribute this income in an appropriate way such as providing free educations and health facilities. Secondly, it seems that the quality of a country rely on the way the government is governing their society. To return to an earlier point that education and health are esse ntial parts of humans’ life. Therefore, the government should give their main concentration to these terms. As they have an authority to govern their society, the have to decide a governmental decision to improve the citizens’ quality life especially in te rms of education and health for poorer societies.Otherwise, the nations will not have an adequate standard of life. On in all, the care of poorer nations is the main responsibility of the government. The most crucial point made so far, although the wealthier nations should help the other voluntarily, the government are playing the significant role to solve this problem by deciding governmental decisions in terms of education and health.Written by - Ni Wayan SulastriModel Answer 2:Today’s world is di vided into industrialised and developing countries, where the main difference between them is the amount of money they spend on the healthcare system, education and infrastructures. Most citizens in developing nations live under the poverty line and, in my opinion, rich countries have the ability and should take up the responsibility of supporting them.It is true that governments of developing nations should take care of their citizens. However, since those countries are buried into debts as a result of unbalances finances, Rich countries aremore equipped to help fewer fortune nations than their own governments. For example, industrialised countries can help poorer nations with some loans or grants that enable them paying off their debts. In addition, many poor countries live in subhuman conditions because of extreme poverty and epidemic diseases like AIDS and Cholera. They lack the knowledge and the sufficient medical resources to tackle such problems. However developed countries can donate them free medicines and send skilled doctors and nurses. On the other hand, people from many developing countries migrate to wealthy nations to study or to work. Richcountries benefit out of those foreigners. For example, many immigrants to France and the UK have proved themselves in those countries by working hard. But on the other side, the economies of immigrants’ countries get worse because their countries lose them while they are needed to lead their nations to a better future. Therefore, it seems to be sensible that rich countries support the immigrants’ home countries. In conclusion, I believe it would be difficult to see any progress in the economy of developing countries without the cooperation of rich nations.Written by - Omni TouskiModel Answer 3:After reckoning enough, I believe that rich or developed nations should share their wealth and resources with those inferior or poorer nations who are starveling and struggling with their system, because there will be a certain hard time which comes to everyone, so for the sake of humanity, such aid should be provided.First of all, there are many countries which are going through some seriously astounding crisis, such as, illiteracy, crashed economy, hunger, nopossessions, corrupt leaders, infectious diseases and extremism. If you contemplate these factors closely then you start to realise that everything is directly proportional to each other. We live in a world, where the ratio of diseases and terrorism is increasing exponentially and we are being victimised of its brutality, the good examples of this are Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa and India. Extremist and terrorist often recruit people, who are illiterate and have no conscience over anything. That is why proper education should be provided to those countries where such extremism is ignited over hunger and illiteracy. On thecontrary, it should be government's number first priority to look after their citizens and provide them basic necessities. That is why we elect them to be our saviour and be ready to face any catastrophe which comes along. To sum up, I would like to maintain that, instead of being ramified, let's be unanimous and provide an aid to education and food to those countries which are not up to the standards as of first world countries, even if their government fails to sustain it.。
