On Bullshit - Harry Frankfurt
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:184.96 KB
- 文档页数:26
《愤怒公牛(1980)》完整中英文对照剧本愤怒的公牛纽约市 196&;;hearts;4&;;hearts;年夜访杰克·拉莫塔我记得那些欢呼声 I remember those cheers, 至今仌在耳边回响 they still ring in my ears, 多年来仌不时想到它们 and for years they remain in my thoughts, 有一天晚上 "cause one night, 我脱掉我的外袍结果呢?I took off my robe, and what"d I do? 我忘了穿上短裤 I forgot to wear shorts.我记得每一次跌倒每一个勾拳和直拳 I recall every fall, every hook, every jab, 还有最糟的减肥方法 the worst way a guy can get rid of his flab, 你知道我的人生并不平淡 as you know, my life wasn"t drab.不过我宁愿Though I"d much...我宁愿听你们欢呼Though I"d rather hear you cheer when you delve...我宁愿你们是因为听我演莎士比亚而欢呼Though I"d rather hear you cheer when I delve into Shakespeare...&;;马儿! 马儿! 一匹马毁了我的王国! &;; &;;A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse!&;; 我有六个月没赢了 I haven"t had a winner in si____ months.虽然我不是奥立维我宁愿And though I"m no Olivier, I would much rather...虽然我不是奥立维如果他跟舒格·雷对打的话 And though I"m no Olivier, if he fought Sugar Ray, 他会说重点不是比赛而是娱乐 he would say that the thing ain"t the ring, it"s the play.让我这只公牛有个可以发威的舞台吧 So, give me a stage where this bull here can rage, 虽然我可以打斗我宁愿吟诵 and though I can fight, I"d much rather recite.那才是娱乐 That"sentertainment.196&;;hearts;4&;;hearts;年杰克·拉莫塔那才是娱乐 That"s entertainment.1941 年杰克·拉莫塔杰克·拉莫塔和吆米·里维Jake La Motta and Jimmy Reeves...在克利夫兰体育场 ...in the Cleveland Arena.拉莫塔还没被击倒但是得分落后很多 La Motta is undefeated, but he"s well behind on points.布朗克斯公牛在这一局挨了不少拳 The Bron____ Bull has taken a lot of punishment in this bout.杰克的左眼受伤吆米·里维略胜Jake is cut around the left eye.Jimmy Reeves has outbo____ed him...杰克告诉我我们他妈的干嘛跑来克利夫兰 Jack, tell me why, why the fuck do we have to e to Cleveland for you 看你被小啰啰打败?to get beaten by a mulignane? 拜托他妈的振作起来吧 e on, do the fuckin" right thing.他吃定你了你得分落后 He"s got you by the balls, you"re outpointed.你要在第十局领先你得把他打倒在地 You"re in" up for the tenth, you"re gonna have to knock him out.我要你咬他踢他不择手段 I want you to bite him, kick him, do anything you gotta do.没人会看到你知道怎么做 Nobody"s lookin", you know what to do.和在家乡一样痛扁那些王八蛋 Just like home...all over the fuckin" moolies.把那混&;;hearts;蛋&;;hearts;打倒听懂没? 把他打倒 Knock the motherfucker out.You understand? Knock him out.嘿你想上场吗? 你想上场去打吗?Hey, you wanna go in there? You wanna go in and do it? 救命Help! 咱们上场去把他打倒吧 We need a knockout, let"s go get a knockout, 上场去吧that"s where it"s at.第十局最后一局祝你们好运Tenth and final round.Good luck to you both.拉莫塔位层下风 La Motta fighting out of a half crouch.里维面对难缠的对手 Reeves is up against a tough fighter, 一个绝不打退堂鼓的人 a man who doesn"t know how to back up.拉莫塔持续进攻说时迟哪时快 La Motta continues to bore in, out of the bob and weave, 左勾拳打到下巴里维倒地了!hooks a left hand to the jaw, and Reeves is down! 观众在为杰克加油 The crowd is urging Jake on.裁判在为里维计时他得快爬起来 The referee is tolling over Reeves.He"s got to get up.拉莫塔再度进攻里维的右拳没打中 La Motta es at him once again, Reeves misses a right, 吃了两记左拳一记重重的左拳打中下巴 takes a left, and another left, a hard left hand to the jaw, 里维二度倒地 and Reeves is down for the second time.意志坚定的杰克·拉莫塔在第十局 A determined Jake La Motta is making a great eback 漂亮地抢回优势 here in the tenth round.里维又爬起来拉莫塔进攻 Reeves is up Motta es at him.下巴一记左勾拳又一记左拳右拳打中身体 A left hook to the jaw, another left, and a right to the body.三个左拳打中上半身下巴一记勾拳Three more lefts to the midsection, a hook on the jaw,头部又两记左拳下巴一记右拳又一记左拳 two more lefts to the head, a right and a left to the jaw.里维第三度倒地 Reeves goes down for the third time, 裁判把拉莫塔拉走 and the referee is pulling La Motta away.二三Two...three...四五four...five...-裁判在为里维计时-六七- The referee is counting over Reeves, -si____...seven...-但是时间不多了-八九- but time is running out...- eight...nine...铃响了 ...and there is the bell.动弹不得的里维被铃&;;hearts;声&;;hearts;解救 He can"t walk, but Reeves has been saved by the bell.但拉莫塔会不会动作慢了点?But did La Motta do it soon enough? 杰克杰克过来Jack, Jack, e here.这样不行这里是俄亥俄不是纽约!It"s no good.This is Ohio, not New York! -你等得太久了!-那个笨蛋!- You waited too long! - That dumb bastard! 把袍子穿好把我的袍子穿好!Put the robe on right, huh? Put my robe on right!各位女士先生Ladies and gentlemen...根据俄亥俄拳击委员会的规定 ...under the rules of the Ohio Bo____ing mission,一致决定 after ten rounds, 这十局比赛的获胜者是 the winner, by unanimous decision, -吆米·里维!-精彩的杰克·拉莫塔 - Jimmy Reeves! - The colorful Jake La Motta, 布朗克斯公牛输了第一场比赛 the Bron____ Bull, has lost his first fight.是杰克赢了比赛! 拜托杰克赢了比赛!That"s Jake"s fight! e on, that"s Jake"s fight! 是杰克赢了那场比赛!Jake won that fight! 不要走不要下场待在这儿Don"t leave.Don"t get outta the fuckin" ring.Stay here.你赢了让他先走你给我留下来 You won...let him gofirst.Stay in, I"m tellin" you.拉莫塔在比赛中打倒里维七次La Motta floored Reeves seven times in the fight, 但是拉莫塔层然输了比赛 but La Motta still lost the fight.杰克! 杰克! 杰克! 杰克!Jake! Jake! Jake! Jake! 救命啊!Help! 纽约市布朗克斯区 1941 年他躺在地上他们把他抬走他不醒人事 ...on his fuckin" back, they pick up his arm, he"s dead.他们说他赢了比赛观众抓狂了 They tell him he won the fight.People went crazy.如果有汤米照应就不会发生那种鸟事 That shit woulda never happened if Tommy was there takin" care of it.他在纽约比赛要听汤米的话才能打进冠军赛 He"s gotta be with Tommy to fight in New York, to get a title shot.你哥哥会变成酒鬼 He"s gonna wind up punch-drunk, your brother.-我知道-你知道 - I know.- You know.你得让他明白这样对大家都好 You gotta make him understand it"s the best thing for everybody involved.-我说我知道-你知道 - I said I know.- You know, 可是你得让他知道让他明白 but you gotta make him know, make him understand it.老天你要不要住口?Jesus Christ, you wanna stop? 你何时才会他妈的停止?When the fuck you gonna stop with that stuff? 我跟你说过我都明白 I told ya, I understand everything.他只会为自己着想 He just wants to do things for himself.-听不懂吗?-那是因为他是 - Hard to understand? - It"s because he"s got a head -死脑筋-你很好笑耶 - like concrete.- You make me laugh.你以为很容易? 你怎么不去跟他说?You think it"s easy? Why don"t you talk to him? -你知道要说什么-你知道我没办法和他说话- You know what to say.- You know I can"t talk to him.-为什么不行?-因为他不喜欢我 - Why can"t you talk to him? - "Cause he don"t like me.没人喜欢你你应该习惯了 Nobody likes you, you oughta be used to it.大家知道 They knew.大家知道谁赢了 They knew who was the boss.裁判不知道谁知道这些人是怎么回事?The judges didn"t know.Who knows what happenedwith them? 观众知道 The people knew.你不相信我你以为我在那儿胡搞吗?You don"t believe me, you thought I was over there foolin" around, huh? 你以为我在胡搞对不对? 告诉我实话You thought I was foolin" around, didn"t ya? Tell me the truth.我可不是胡搞瞎搞 I ain"t doin" no foolin" around.-是你这么想-是又怎么样?- That"s in your mind.- Yeah, so what? 等我戴上冠军腰带我才会开始胡搞 That chionship belt on me, that"s when I fool around.熟了没?Is it done? 还没熟 No, it"s not done.不要煎太老煎太老就不好吃了 Don"t overcook it.You overcook it, it"s no good.它就失去意义了 It defeats its own purpose.你在做什么? 我说了不要煎太老 What are you doin"? I just said don"t overcook it.你把它煎老了拿过来呀 You"re overcookin" it, bring it over.-你要你的牛排吗?-拿过来呀 - You want your steak? - Bring it over.拿过来!Bring it over! 快变成木炭了! 拿过来!It"s like a piece of charcoal! Bring it over here!-你要你的牛排?-对现在就要!- You want your steak? - Yeah, right now! 好你的臭牛排 Good.There"s your stupid steak.-等不及把它煎熟是吧?-对我等不及了 - Can"t wait for it to be done? - No, I can"t wait.好可以了吗? 高兴了吗?Good.Okay? Happy? -高兴了吗?-我只要这个 - Happy? - That"s all I want.拿去没有了都拿去 That"s...there, no, more.There.你为了牛排跟我吵? 你为了牛排跟我吵?Botherin" me about a steak, huh? You"re botherin" me about a steak? 我同意他应该听汤米的 I agree with you.He should be with Tommy.他如果心情好我会跟他说不然你要我怎么样?If he"s in a good mood, I"ll talk to him.What the fuck you want me to do? 汤米每天都要我来找你 Tommytells me every day to talk to you 去跟杰克谈解决这件事 and speak to Jake to straighten this thing out, 到头来我会两面不是人 I"m gonna wind up in the middle.你两面不是人? 我是他弟弟 You"re in the middle? I"m his brother.-他把我搞疯了-你是他弟弟 - He"s got me fuckin" nuts.- You"re his brother.如果你不能跟他谈谁能跟他谈?If you can"t talk to him, who"s gonna talk to him? -我会跟他谈-你尽力就好 - I"ll talk to him.- Do what you can, that"s all.-我只求这么多-明天见 - That"s all I"m askin" you.- I"ll see you tomorrow.-让我上去-好吗? 你会在哪儿?- Let me go up.- All right? Where you gonna be? 我会在体育馆或其它的老地方 I"ll be at the gym or the other joint, one of the two.-我会去体育馆找你-好沙维?- I"ll catch you by the gym.- All right.Sal? 怎么?Yeah? 再抱怨啊我要听听 plain some more, I wanna hear.-抱怨? 这是胡萝卜吗?-没错 - plain? You call those carrots? - That"s right.-这算是食物吗?-你吃啦你有没有吃?- You call that food? - You ate "em.Did you eat them? 这算是食物吗? 我没有选择啊!You call that food? I got no choice! -我受不了你了!-我没有选择啊!- I"m sick of you already! - I got no choice! -我不敢相信!-我没有选择!- I can"t believe you! - I got no choice! 你没有选择? 离我远一点!You got no choice? Get away from me! -拜托你!-给我进来给我进来!- Please! - Get in there.Get in there! 不要碰我离我远一点!Get your hands off me, get away from me! 他妈的!我受够你了!Fuck! I"m sick of you! 在搞什么你们是畜牲吗?What"s the matter with you, you animals? -什么?-杰克别这样!- What? - Jack, e on! -你们是畜牲!-好了啦好吗?- You animals! - e on, huh? 这只王八骂我是畜牲This son of a bitch is callin" me an animal.-喂!-好了杰克 - Hey, you! - e on, Jack.我会把那只狗抓来当午餐吃!I"m gonna get hold of that dog, and I"m gonna eatit for lunch! 你听到没? 听到没赖瑞?You hear what I"m sayin"? You hear me, Larry? -赖瑞?-发狂的畜牲!- Larry? - Crazy animal! 谁是畜牲? 你妈才是畜牲!Who"s an animal? Your mother"s an animal! 你这只王八!You son of a bitch!你明天会在走廊上看到那只狗的尸体 You"re gonnafind your dog dead in the hallway tomorrow, ya bum.-我受不了啦!-整条街上的人 - I can"t take it! - The whole block, -都听到你们在吵-我要把他们全家杀了 - people could hear you.- I"ll kill the whole family.-坐下轻松点-我再也受不了了!- Sit down, rela____.- I can"t take this anymore! 你在里头打破东西我就宰了你!You break anything in there, I"m gonna kill ya! 我对天发誓我会进去杀了你 I swear to God, I"m gonna e in there and kill ya.来啊 Yeah, sure.你要冷静点吗?You wanna calm down? 他妈的!Oh, fuck! 我做了什么?What"d I do? 好了甜心我们和好吧 e on, honey, let"s be friends.-别吵了好吗?-不好!- Truce, all right? - It"s not all right! 我告诉你你不能You can"t, I"m telling you...你不能整天暴饮暴食you can"t fuckin" eat and drink like an animal, 过着这种生活 put up with this fuckin" brasciole here.你不能这样我告诉你 You can"t do this.I"m tellin" ya.忘了里维那件事你还有无数场比赛要打 Forget about the Reevesthing, you got a million other fights in" up.你不能这样下去 You just can"t keep doin" this.怎么了?What"s wrong? 你有心事怎么了?Something"s the matter, what"s up? 你知道我在烦什么吗?You know what"s botherin" me? 我的手 My hands.你的手? 怎么样?Your hands? What about "em? 我的手很小我的手是女人的手 I got these small hands.I got a little girl"s hands.我的也是有什么差别吗?I got "em, too.What"s the difference? 知道那代表什么吗?Know what that means? 不管我变得多强不管我跟谁打No matter how big I get, no matter who I fight, 不管我怎么做我永远都无法和乔·路易斯对打 no matter what I do, I ain"t never gonna fight Joe Louis.没错他是重量级你是中量级的 That"s right, he"s a heavyweight, you"re a middleweight.我永远都没有机会和最强的高手对决 I ain"t never gonna get a chance to fight the best there is.你知道吗? 我比他们都强 And you know somethin"? I"m better than them.我却永远没有机会 I ain"t nevergonna get a chance.你还问我怎么了 You"re asking me what"s wrong.你疯了才会有这种想法 You"re crazy to even think about somethin" like that.他是重量级的你是中量级的 He"s a fuckin" heavyweight, you"re a middleweight.本来就不可能发生干嘛烦这种事?It"s impossible, it"ll never happen, so why go crazy thinkin" about it? 太不正常了 It"s not normal.帮我个忙 Do me a favor.-好干嘛?-我要你打我的脸 - Yeah, what? - I want you to hit me in the face.-什么?-我要你打我的脸 - What? - I want you to hit me in the face.别想 Forget about it.我要你打我的脸快点 I want you to hit me in the face, go ahead.-使尽最大的力气-别想我不要 - Take your best shot.- Forget about it, I ain"t doin" it.我们常打架你担心什么?We have fights all the time...are you worried now? 打我的脸来吧 Hit me in the face.Go ahead.-不要-怎么你怕吗?- No.- What, are you afraid? 怕什么?Afraid of what? 快点别像娘娘腔打我 e on, don"tbe a little faggot, hit me.-我不是娘娘腔-使出最大的力气快 - I ain"t a fag.- Take yourbest shot, go ahead.别这样你这混&;;hearts;蛋&;;hearts; 竟然要我打你的脸 e on.You gotta be a real jerk, you want me to punch you in the face.我已经说过了我再说一次你非打不可 Did I not tell you just to do it? Now I"m tellin" you, you gotta do it.我不要打你 I ain"t hittin" ya.我是你哥哥乔伊我在跟你说话 I"m your older brother, Joey.I"m tellin" ya somethin".我知道你说什么我不要 I know what you said.I ain"t doin" it.我不管你会不会发火我不要 I don"t care if you get mad, I ain"t doin" it.他妈的疯子 Fuckin" nut.我不要我不要那么做I"m not doin" it, I"m not gonna do it.我没有手套要我拿桌子打你吗?I don"t have any gloves.What am I gonna hit you with, the table? -我不要-用那个就好 - I ain"t doin" it.- Use that over there.-什么?-没错用那个 - What? - That"s right, use that.用那个把手包起来! 你要我说几次啊?Wrap it around your hand! How many times I gotta tell you? -不要再说了-来吧- Not too many more.- Go ahead.你要我打你?You want me to hit you? 我要你使出全力 I want you to hit me...我要你把我打倒在地上来吧 ...with everything you got.I want you to fuckin" lay me out, go ahead.-你确定?-对 - You sure? - Yeah.-来吧-好吧 - Go ahead.- All right.-用力点-是吗?- Harder.- Yeah? 你的拳真娘娘腔拜托 You throw a punch like you take it up the ass, e on.用力点用力点Harder, harder.-用力点-我用力了妈的 - Harder.- That"s hard, you fuck.-你想怎样?-脱下来 - What do you want? - Take it off.-脱下来-好了可以住手了吗?- Take it off.- e on, you wanna stop now? -够了吧-脱下来 - That"s enough with that...- Take it off.别这样 e on.-来啊-不要闹 - e on.- Don"t fuck around.-你是女人吗?-女人是吧?- What are you, a girl? - Oh, girl, huh? 我会再打你的再来 I"m gonna smack you again, throw it again.-够了-来吧 - That"s enough.- Go ahead.-我说够了!-用力点用力点 - I said that"s enough! - Harder, harder.不要你的伤口又开了 No, your fuckin" cuts are opening and everything.你想证明什么? 这能证明什么?What are you tryin" to prove? What does it prove?嘿维多 Hey, Vito.乔伊都好吗?Joey, what"s what? 杰克气色不错哟 Jake, you"re lookin" good.你好吗?How you doin"? 别待在这儿 Don"t stay here.乔伊Joey.过来 e here.他生气了是吧?Yeah, he looks mad, huh? 看来在生气 Looks mad.昨天找他谈的不知道 Spoke to him yesterday, I don"t know.你找他们来这儿的吗?You told "em to e up here? 回答我的话 Answer me when I talk to you.怎么了? 我不能找朊友来吗?Yeah, why? I can"t have my friends up here? -听说这混&;;hearts;蛋&;;hearts;输了比赛-说话小心点 - I heard this fucker didn"t win the fight.- Take it easy.不准再把他们带来听见没?Don"t ever bring "em up here again, hear me? 听见没? 说啊 Hear me? e on.-来啊!-他们两个看来像同性恋 - e on! - They look like two fags over there.我们走了明天打电&;;hearts;话&;;hearts;给你好吗? We"re gonna go, I"ll call you tomorrow, huh? 杰克小心别伤到自己 Hey, Jake, watch you don"t hurt yourself.夫人好吗? 一切都好吗?How"s your wife? Is everything okay? 有人找你麻烦就来找我好吗?Anybody bothers you, let me know, okay? 挥手啊他们是你的朊友 Yeah.Yeah, wave.They"re your friends.你是怎么搞的? 你非让我出糗不可是吧 What the fuck is wrong with you? You gotta make a fuckin" jerk outta me.他们来是因为汤米要他们来帮我们 They only came up here "cause Tommy told "em to e up to try to help us.你怎么搞的帮谁? 你是怎么搞的?What"s the matter with you, help who? What"s the matter with you? 他们要怎么帮我? 拿我的钱吗?How they gonna help me? What, by takin" my money? 你们在讨论怎么拿我的钱吗?Is that what youse talkin" about, takin" my money? 在场上卖&;;hearts;&;;hearts;命的是我不是他们 I"m here breakin" my ass, not them.不准再把他们带来这里听到没?Don"t ever bring "em up here again, you hear me?你是蠢蛋吗?What are ya, a jerk there? 我是蠢蛋你才是他妈的王八蛋 I"m a jerk? You"re a fuckin" asshole.你干嘛打我?What the fuck you hittin" me, huh? 你硬汉是吧吃这一拳 Yeah, yeah, ya fuckin" hard-on, try this.也许你硬不起来?Maybe you can"t, huh? 混&;;hearts;蛋&;;hearts;!Ya fuck! 热狗沙士冰淇淋给我一瓶可乐 e on, give me a Coke.走开你们要去跳舞吗?Hey, shove off.You gonna go to the dance? 要去跳舞吗?Go to the dance? -那个女孩是谁?-刚才和我说话的那个吗?- Who"s that girl over there? - The one I was talkin" to? -对-金发妞?- Yeah.- The blonde? -对-她是维琪- Yeah.- Vickie, you mean.-她是哪里人?-她就住在附近 - Where"s she from? - She"s from the neighborhood, 她是邻家女孩 she"s a neighborhood girl.她姓什么?What"s her last name? 我只知道她叫维琪他们都叫她维琪 Vickie, that"s all I know.They call her Vickie.她认识他们?She knows them? 她认识他们他们认识她她每天都来泳池 She knows them, they know her, she es to the pool every day.大家都认识你知道的 Everybody knows each other...you know how that shit works.-她跟他们混吗?-她谁也不混 - She go with them? - She don"t go with nobody.她才十五岁她能上哪去?She"s 15 years old, where the fuck"s she gonna go? 你要带她去酒吧吗?Where ya gonna take her, the Copacabana? 我听说他有个女友 I heard there was a girl that he went with 是个年轻的金发美女 that was a very beautiful young girl, blonde.-怎样?-不是她吗?- Yeah? - It"s not her? 我想不太可能 I doubt it very much.你到底在想什么?What are you thinkin" about, anyway? 她不是那种可以随便打一炮的女孩子 She ain"t the kinda girl youjust fuck and forget about.乔伊你要我说几次?Joey, how many times I gotta tell ya? 你为什么老是在我面前说粗话?Why are you always cursin" when I"m talkin" to you? 别在我面前说去找你的朊友说 Don"t do it around me.Doit around your friends.-就是不喜欢你这么做-好她- It"s that thing, just don"t do it.- All right, she"s...她不是那种随便上&;;hearts;床&;;hearts;的女孩子 The kinda girl you bang and forget about...she"s not likethat.你得花时间陪她谈感情 You gotta spend time with her, get involved.你知道吧You know, it"s...你有上她吗?D"you bang her? -没有-告诉我实话 - No.- Tell me the truth.我说的是实话我第一次就跟你说实话了 I just told you the truth.I tell you the truth the first time, 你不必再问我一次我就不会那样 you don"t have to ask me again, I never do that.我只跟你说实话如果我做了你会知道 I always tell you the truth.If I did it, you would know.我带她出去几次 I took her out a couple of times.你和她约会? 你没有想办法上她?You went with her? You didn"t try to fuck her? 我什么都想上你知道的 I try to fuck anything, you know that.-她没让你上?-没有她不要 - She didn"t go with you? - No, she didn"t go for it.-当然了-当然?- Naturally.- Naturally? -算她聪明-什么叫算她聪明?- She knew better.- What do you mean, she knew better? 她知道你是个畜牲 She knew you were an animal, 她知道和你在一起没有好下场 she knew it was no good if you"d go with her.她的名声会毁于一旦 Her reputation would be ruined.他刚才和你的维琪说话 I thought he was talkin" to you, Vickie.-那个-同一个家伙?- That"s...- That"s the same guy? -对同一个家伙-我要打断他的腿 - Yeah, it"s the same guy.- Igotta break his legs.他昨天也在He was over here yesterday.-他昨天也在?-你错过他了 - He was here yesterday? - You missed him.我昨天在家不知道他在这儿 I was up to the house yesterday.Didn"t know he was over here.-你留在这儿我去找他-不我会碰到他的 - You stay in there, I"ll go find him.- No, I can catch him.你的朊友在偷偷开会谈生意Your friends, they"re in a huddle.Big business meeting.他们跑来泳池边谈话 e by the pool, they sit around and talk.谈大生意故意让她听到 Big deals.They make sureshe can hear.跩得不得了滚远点吧 Hey, like the big man.Get the fuck outta here.你要去哪要下水吗?Where you goin", gettin" in the water? 别把头发弄湿了 Don"t get your hair wet.大人物 Big shot.把他拖到后头去扁一顿就知道Get him alone in the back room, smack him around, no more big shot...没枪就不是大人物了 without his gun.一副硬汉的样子 Yeah, real tough guys.-他们都是硬汉-你在想什么?- They"re all tough guys.- What are you thinkin" about? 还看你在想什么? 你死会了你结婚了 Keep lookin".Where the fuck you goin"? You"re dead, you"re married.你结婚了没得玩了把妹妹留给我吧 You"re a married man, it"s all over.Leave the young girls for me.大人物 Big shot.咱们快走吧你要在这儿耗一晚吗?Let"s get outta here.You gonna stay here all night? 我们会进不去的 We"ll never get through.你这么晚了想上哪儿去?Where the hell do you think you"re goin" at this hour?你是条子吗? 我要出去谈生意 What are you, a cop? I"m goin" out.Business.人&;;hearts;渣&;;hearts; 你出去我也要出去 Fuckin" worm.You go out, I"m goin" out.随便你我不在乎 Do what you"re gonna do, what do I care?出去啊我不在乎 Run out, see if I care.你回来就看不到我了!I"m not gonna be here when you get back! 他妈的死意大利人 Fuckin" bunch of guineas.-走到哪儿都黏在一起!-你住嘴好不好?- You"re always hangin" out together! - Why don"t you stop already? 你怎么不住嘴? 你才不是去谈生意 Why don"t you fuckin" stop? You"re not goin" on business.-你们是同性恋!-你放尊重点 - You"re goin" to suck each other off! - Why don"t you have some respect? -整栋楼都听到了-让他爽! 让他爽!- The whole buildin" hears ya.- Suck him! Suck him, baby! 赖瑞! 这下子你又有八卦可以说了 Hey, Larry! Now you got somethin" to talk about 那只狗加上楼上这只母狗with that fuckin" dog, and this one up there.死犹太婊&;;hearts;子&;;hearts; 你怎么不教训她?Fuckin" Jew cunt, why don"t you hit her in the head with a bat? 不准骂她她还是我老婆 Don"t call her no names, she"s still my wife.-你还要忍&;;hearts;受多久?-我教训她了 - How much abuse you wanna take? - I hit her enough.-我还能怎么办?-把她宰了 - What am I supposed to do? - Kill the fuck.走啊! 把我像狗一样丢在家里!Go ahead! Just leave me here like a dog! 你们你也一样滚啊!You and your fuckin" ass...you, too ya...go out! -你是怎么回事?-你才怎么回事?- What"s the matter with you? - What the fuck"s the matter with you? -你要把我丢在这儿?-整条街都听到你在吼 - You gotta leave me here? - You let the whole block hear you.-你是怎么回事?-我才不在乎死同性恋!- What"s the matter with you? - I could give a shit, ya fuckin" queer! -同性恋! 去搞他啊!-你说什么?- Faggot! Go stick it up his ass! - What"d you say? 圣克莱教堂年度夏季舞会八月六日星期六切斯特饭店哦! 宾斯!Oh! Beans! 杰克 Jack.宾斯在后面有一桌他说我们可以跟他们坐 Beansy got a table in the back, he said we could sit with them.宾斯? 哪个宾斯?Beansy who? Which Beansy? -啊?-哪个宾斯?- Huh? - Beansy who? 宾斯他和他们一起的 Beans,you know, he"s one of the guys.-你见到他就知道了-她会在那边吗?- You"ll know him when you see him.- She"ll beover there? 我不知道但至少仍那儿可以看得到 I don"t know, but you could see from there, at least.-咱们走吧-我不想表现太明显 - e on, let"s go.- I don"t wanna look too hard.-乔伊你好吗?-宾斯你好吗?- Hello, Joe, how you doin"? - Beansy, what is it? 谢谢你安排座位 Thanks for the seats.-嗨乔伊-嘿你怎么样?- Hi, Joey.- Hey, what"s up? Hey.没什么楼下有两个混球找我麻烦 Nothing.I got trouble with these two motherfuckin" greaseballs downstairs, -快把我搞疯了-神父你好吗?- they got me crazy.- Hello, Father, how ya doin"? -神父你好吗?-神父!- Hey, Father, what is it? - Oh, ho, Father! 你想找人上&;;hearts;床&;;hearts;吗? 你确定?You wanna get laid? You sure? -你确定?-不要不要 - You sure? - Hey, no, no.神父你要上哪去? 祝福我们啊 Father, where you goin"? Bless the table, give us a shot.你这星期有捐钱吗?D"you put money in the basket this week? -有没有看到她在那儿?-看到了 - You see her right there? - I saw, I saw.-有吧?-看到了 - Okay? - I saw.-他们在约她。
2023-2024学年四川省成都市树德中学高三上学期开学考试英语试题Join us for an exciting day of music at the UNI Dome with the Panther Marching Band!Band Day is perfect for high school band students in grades 9—12. Come and join us for an outstanding, positive and friendly musical and social experience for high school band students! We hope you'll enjoy the fellowship with other band students throughout the state and the fantastic performances of bands!Directors who wish to bring their full bands or a smaller group of band students should find this to be an easy and fun event to organize and attend! Individual(个体的)students who wish to participate as single performers are strongly encouraged to attend! You'll have a chance to meet our fantastic students and perform in a friendly, welcoming environment!Date: November 9Music: A link to download music will be included in your confirmation email after you register. Music will be available at that link no later than September 1.Registration:●Band directors registering full bands or groups of students from the same band should register here: https: //bands, uni. edu/band-day-group-registration●Individual students registering independently may register here: https://bands. uni. edu/panther-band- day-individual-registrationCost: $ 10. 00 per student includes: admission to the game, pizza dinner, music and a Band Day T-Shirt.Notes:●We've changed our payment method to improve the registration process. Individual stud ents must pay using a credit card at the time of registration. Band directors may either pay with credit card or mail a check made out to Panther Marching Band.●Final deadline for registration submissions is Monday, October 14.●Due to space limitations, band/individual students may be limited to a first-reply basis.1. How can a participant benefit from the event?A.Listen to their favorite popular music.B.Get a chance to join a band they love.C.Chat with famous musicians face to face.D.Know new people and enjoy performances.2. When can a participant use the link in the confirmation email to download music?A.On August 30. B.On September 2.C.On October 14. D.On November 9.3. What are you expected to do to participate as an individual student?A.Ask for a band director's company. B.Send a 10-dollar check to the Band.C.Pay 10 dollars with your credit card. D.Email the Band just on November 9.Sally Dawly is a woman from Auburn, California. Over the last three and a half years, the anti-littering woman has spent most of her free time picking up cigarette butts (烟头) from the streets of her home city.Called the “Butt Lady” by her local community, Dawly began her mission to rid the streets of her city of cigarette butts in October, 2014. The woman looked for cigarette butts, picked them up and threw them in the trash. To keep a count of how many butts she picks up, the Butt Lady has been using a tablet, and earlier this month, she hit a historic milestone—one million cigarette butts.“I got tired of going on my walks and seeing cigarette butts everywhere,” Sally Dawly said. “I’m just shocked that I had to pick up so many. I’ve ever picked up 3,000 butts in one day,” she said. “Don’t throw away your butts; better yet, stop smoking.”With so many cigarette butts littering the streets, can one person’s efforts really make a difference? Surprisingly, the answer seems to be yes. Soon after the Butt Lady of Auburn started her mission and word of her efforts spread, cigarette cans started appearing around bars and restaurants in the city. Members of the local community even came out to cheer her on as she approached her one-million-butt milestone.Sally knows her city’s cigarette butt littering problem won’t be solved anytime soon, but she hopes her work will inspire people to at least think twice before dropping cigarette butts in the streets. She has decided to continue cleaning up after irresponsible smokers, and already has a new milestone in her sights—two million cigarette butts.Word of the Butt Lady’s efforts to keep the streets cigarette butt-free has reached neighboring communities as well, and CBS Sacramento reports that other cities have started seeking her help as well.4. Why does Sally Dawly carry an iPad with her while picking up the butts?A.To entertain the crowds.B.To monitor the smokers.C.To attract people’s attention.D.To record the number of butts.5. How did Sally Dawly feel when picking up cigarette butts?A.Excited but upset. B.Shocked and sorryC.Frightened but content. D.Astonished and desperate.6. From the text. what can be inferred about Sally Dawly?A.She picks up nearly 3,000 cigarette butts every day.B.She will work in other cities in California in the future.C.She has set a new goal of picking up two million cigarette butts.D.She picked up one million cigarette butts with members of her community.7. What is the text mainly about?A.California’s “Butt Lady”.B.Fighting against smoking.C.Californians health problems.D.Smoking problems in California.We've all experienced it. We invite a friend to dinner, only to learn that she is the dreaded "V-word". Vegan is someone who allows a diet that contains no animal meat, fish, eggs, dairy products, or any other food that comes from animals. They differ from vegetarians, who generally still eat dairy and eggs as part of their diets. Vegans also typically abstain from using any other products that come from animals, such as honey and leather jackets.Back in 2008, vegans only accounted for around 0.5 percent of the U. S. population, or about one million people. As of polls taken in 2014, vegans now make up roughly 2.5 percent of the population. At least in the United States, women seem to be far bigger fans of veganism, making up around 79 percent of vegans.People on a vegan diet tend to be leaner. In a cross-sectional study of nearly 40,000 adults, meat eaters had the highest mean body mass index, or BMI. Vegetarians were in the middle, and vegans had the lowest. Based on several studies from Finland, some scientists have suggested that vegan diets may be helpful in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis(类风湿性关节炎). Vegans also appear to have lower rates of hypertension(高血压) than both meat eaters and vegetarians. Vegans also typically have lower cardio metabolic(心脏代谢) risks for conditions like heart disease or strokes.While there certainly may be some health advantages in going vegan, there seems to be some common deficiencies in the diet. One of these deficiencies is with the vitamin B-12. The ADA states that there are no natural plant foods that contain any significant amount of the vitamin. Vegans can still get it, but they need to take a vitamin or consume fortified foods like soy milk and certain breakfast cereals. Omega-3 fatty acids(欧米珈-3 脂肪酸) are also very difficult to come by on a vegan diet, but this can be overcome through the consumption of algae(海藻) supplements. With vegans requiring supplementation to meet their nutritional needs, it supports the claim that veganism is unnatural, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's unhealthy.Many health organizations, including the ADA, state that well-planned vegan diets are healthy and nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certaindiseases. It seems like no matter what your dietary preferences are, a healthy lifestyle can be achieved on or off a vegan diet.8. Which example illustrates he/she is a vegan?A.His/Her diet is made up of large amounts of plant-based carbohydrates.B.He/She eats meat on special occasions, usually pork, as well as small amounts of fish on a weekly basis.C.He/She believes small amounts of animal products are vital to good health, and they insist on eating them every day.D.He/She fries French fries by animal oil.9. Which statement is TRUE according to the passage?A.Finland is the leading country in the world to study veganism.B.Vegetarians had the highest mean BMI.C.Vegan diets may be helpful in the treatment of cancer.D.The number of vegan in the U. S. is on the rise.10. Vitamin B-12 can be got from _______.A.various vegetables B.soy milk and cerealsC.water D.sunbath11. What is the writer's attitude towards going vegan?A.Objective. B.Subjective.C.Critical. D.Disapproval.ChatGPT is a new AI system that sounds so human in conversations that it could host its own radio programs. Reading between its instantly generated, perfectly grammatical lines, people see different visions of the future. Without doubt, ChatGPT is impressive.Some compare the emergenc e of ChatGPT to the impact of the iPhone, but that doesn’t do it justice. ChatGPT, as well as the generative AI that will follow and outsmart it, is more disruptive. And yet, that doesn’t necessarily mean the end of the world is upon us. On the contrary, C hatGPT, I would argue, might serve to make us more aware of our irreplaceable human qualities.Take the creative act, writing in particular, as an example. If you want it to, the AI-powered chatbot always produces something because it has the whole world of online data to draw from. But unlike us, it lacks the consciousness. Thinking is hard, critical thinking even harder, and ChatGPT isn’t good at either. It just restates what has already been said; it is one big recycling machine.There is another obvious limitation of ChatGPT. Philosopher Harry Frankfurt once claimed: the difference between a bullshitter (胡说八道的人) and a liar is that the liar knows what the truth is butdecides to take the opposite direction; a bullshitter, however, has no regard for the truth at all. The AI scholar Gary Marcus applies this distinction to ChatGPT. He believes that we have reached a critical point when “the price of bullshit reaches zero and people who want to spread misinformation, either politically or just to make a profit, start doing that plentifully”. Unfortunately, ChatGPT will reproduce misinformation from any of its input sources — it is not an intelligent system that tries to balance or weight different perspectives. In this sense, everything that ChatGPT writes is bullshit.This is why the so-called AIQ is critical. It is actually an extension and a measurement of our human IQ: our overall knowledge of AI tools, our mastery of clues, and our ethical awareness. ChatGPT is going to change everything and nothing. Creativity, imagination and ethics — these will all remain unique human domains. It is the AI’s very limitations that will make us appreciate our own.12. What can we learn about ChatGPT?A.It helps generate an artificial voice.B.It provides instructions on writing skills.C.It generates natural language responses.D.It offers a service for language learning.13. What does the underlined word “disruptive” in paragraph 2 probably mean?A.Evil.B.Reliable.C.Profitable.D.Revolutionary.14. Why does the author consider ChatGPT as a bullshit generator?A.It makes up lies constantly.B.It can’t tell right from wrong.C.It often makes unfair judgement.D.It always takes a neutral standpoint.15. Which can be a suitable title for the text?A.ChatGPT Makes Us HumanB.ChatGPT Is Causing Panic NowC.ChatGPT: Treat It Like a Toy, Not a ToolD.ChatGPT:Why It Is Bound to Generate BullshitWhat is mental health?Mental health is an expression we use every day, so it might surprise yo u that the term ‘mental health’ is frequently misunderstood. 16According to the WHO, however, mental health is “a state of well-being in which every individual realizes his or her own potential, can deal with the normal stresses of life, can work fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to her or his community.”17To make things a bit clearer, some experts have tried coming up with different terms to explain the difference between ‘mental health’ and ‘mental health conditions’, such as ‘good mental health’,‘mental well-being’, and even ‘happiness’. 18As a result, some of them have tried to explain the difference by talking about a continuous whole where mental health is at one end of the range while mental health conditions are at the other.Research shows that high levels of mental health are associated with increased learning, creativity and productivity. 19 In contrast, mental health conditions can cause distress and bad effect on relationships. They are also related to poor physical health and death from suicide.20 The fact that someone is not experiencing a mental health condition doesn’t necessarily mean his mental health is good. Likewise, it’s possible to be diagnosed with a mental health condition while feeling well in many aspects of life.Briefly, mental health is about being emotionally and socially healthy – the way we think, feel and develop relationships - and not merely the absence of a mental health condition.It is dark now when I begin my early morning walk in the woods. And now that autumn has marched into winter, darkness persists well beyond my 6 a. m. start time.Paths have become familiar after years of hiking. But rocks and tree roots have magically appeared from previously ________ ground.Certainly I hit my toe against or ________ on some unseen barriers. Fallen branches from last night’s storm ________ in wait. Layers of autumn leaves create a false floor through which my trusting footsteps ________. Sometimes a piece of moon donates some ________ to the mystery path. But when skies are dark, there are no ________ clues for where I step.My very first night hike was during summer camp on a warm August night in the woods. Our leader ________ bright flashlights so we would not scare away the night creatures we hoped to find.“See with your ________,” the leader told us over and over again.________,that advice took effect. With ________ and courage, it didn’t take long before our feet became ________ to the ground’s textures(质地) and irregularities. Toes learned to ________ for barriers before trusting full weight on feet. Holes and dips in the ground were detected in ________ of possible fall…But mistakes ________ happened. My foot got caught on a trip and I fell. Since the pace was________, there was little damage except to pride. Once ________, I paused to feel the firmness of earth beneath me.On my way home, as dawn ________ day, I thought about how similar night hikes were to journeys through life.The same rules often ________ for both: slow down, concentration, “see” with new senses —and don’t be ________. Although the path is full of ________— hidden barriers, false surface, wet floor — the earth is solid and firm beneath. It is the nature of night ground. It is the nature of life.21.A.wet B.soft C.level D.hard22.A.step B.tour C.go D.trip23.A.stand B.lie C.stain D.hang24.A.sink B.break C.walk D.remove25.A.coldness B.courage C.loneliness D.light26.A.vague B.typical C.visual D.conscious27.A.shone B.forbade C.removed D.collected28.A.eyes B.toes C.hands D.feet29.A.Amazingly B.Directly C.Possibly D.Luckily30.A.contribution B.appreciation C.concentration D.expectation31.A.suspicious B.cautious C.sensitive D.tentative32.A.head B.explore C.clarify D.assess33.A.advance B.search C.need D.spite34.A.also B.even C.still D.ever35.A.rapid B.mild C.gentle D.slow36.A.up B.out C.down D.away37.A.made up for B.made way for C.made use of D.made sense of 38.A.suit B.work C.answer D.apply39.A.scared B.confused C.disappointed D.annoyed40.A.darkness B.hopelessness C.anxieties D.uncertainties阅读下面短文,在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。
movie review英语范文哈利波特全文共10篇示例,供读者参考篇1Title: My Favourite Movie – Harry PotterHey guys! Today I want to talk about my favorite movie of all time –Harry Potter! It’s a super cool movie about a boy named Harry who discovers he’s a wizard and goes to a magical school called Hogwarts. I’ve watched all the movies in the series and I just love them all!The first movie is called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. It’s all about Harry’s first year at Hogwarts and how he learns about his past and his destiny. He meets his best friends Ron and Hermione, and they have lots of adventures together. There’s a scary teacher named Snape and a huge troll that they have to fight. But in the end, they all work together and save the day!The second movie is called Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. This time, there’s a mysterious monster terrorizing the school and Harry has to figure out how to stop it. It’s a really exciting movie with lots of twists and turns. I love how braveHarry is and how loyal his friends are. They never give up, no matter how tough things get.The third movie is called Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. This one is my favorite because it introduces us to my favorite character, Sirius Black. He’s a good guy who’s been wrongly accused of a crime and Harry helps him clear his name. There’s a really cool time-traveling twist in this movie that’s so fun to watch. I love how cleverly everything comes together in the end.The fourth movie is called Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. This one is really intense because Harry has to compete in a dangerous tournament against older students. There are dragons and underwater challenges and a creepy maze to navigate. It’s so thrilling to watch and I love how Harry never gives up, even when things look impossible.The fifth movie is called Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. In this one, Harry has to fight against the evil wizard Voldemort and his followers, the Death Eaters. It’s a really dark movie with lots of action and suspense. But Harry and his friends never stop fighting for what’s right, no matter how scary things get.The sixth movie is called Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. This one is all about Harry and Dumbledore trying to uncover Voldemort’s secrets. There’s a lot of mystery and suspense in this movie, and the ending is so heartbreaking. I love how Harry and his friends stick together and support each other, even when things are tough.The seventh movie is called Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. This is the final movie in the series and it’s so epic! Harry and his friends have to find and destroy the Horcruxes, which are pieces of Voldemort’s soul. There are epic battles and heartbreaking losses, but in the end, good triumphs over evil. It’s such a satisfying conclusion to the series and I love how everything comes full circle.I can’t recommend the Harry Potter movies enough. They’re so magical and exciting and they teach us all about friendship, courage, and standing up for what’s right. If you haven’t seen them yet, you’re missing out! Grab some popcorn, snuggle up with a blanket, and get ready for the adventure of a lifetime with Harry Potter and his friends at Hogwarts. Trust me, you won’t regret it!篇2Title: Harry Potter - A Magical AdventureHey guys, have you ever watched the Harry Potter movies? They are super awesome and filled with magic and adventure! Today I'm gonna tell you all about my favorite Harry Potter movie, "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone".The movie starts with a little boy named Harry Potter who lives with his mean aunt and uncle. But one day, he finds out he is a wizard and goes to study at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. How cool is that?At Hogwarts, Harry makes friends with Ron and Hermione, and together they go on all sorts of exciting adventures. They even find out about a magical stone that can give its owner everlasting life! But they have to make sure it doesn't fall into the wrong hands, like the evil wizard Voldemort. He's super scary!The best part of the movie is when Harry plays Quidditch, a super cool game played on flying broomsticks. He's a natural and becomes the star player of the team! And let's not forget about the flying keys and giant chess pieces they have to get through to find the magical stone. It's so thrilling!Overall, I think "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" is a must-watch movie for everyone. It's filled with magic, friendship,and the fight between good and evil. Plus, the special effects are amazing! I can't wait to watch the rest of the Harry Potter movies and see what other adventures Harry, Ron, and Hermione go on.So grab some popcorn, sit back, and get ready for a magical ride with Harry Potter! Trust me, you won't be disappointed.篇3Title: My Review of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's StoneHey guys, have you ever watched the movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone? If you haven't, you totally should! This movie is so magical and awesome, just like Hogwarts!The story is about a boy named Harry Potter who learns that he is a wizard on his eleventh birthday. He goes to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, where he meets his best friends Ron and Hermione. Together, they go on all sorts of adventures and fight against the dark wizard Voldemort.I love all the characters in the movie, especially Harry, Ron, and Hermione. They are so brave and loyal to each other. And of course, who can forget about Hagrid, the lovable half-giant who takes care of magical creatures?The special effects in the movie are really cool, like when Harry and his friends play Quidditch, a flying sport on broomsticks. The flying scenes are so exciting and thrilling!I think the message of the movie is about friendship and courage. Harry and his friends stick together, no matter what challenges they face. They show us that we can do anything if we believe in ourselves.Overall, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is an amazing movie that you won't want to miss! It's full of magic, friendship, and adventure. So grab some popcorn, gather your friends, and have a magical movie night watching Harry Potter!篇4Title: A Magical Adventure with Harry PotterHey guys! I just watched this super cool movie called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, and it was AWESOME! I'm gonna tell you all about it in this review.First of all, let me tell you about the main character, Harry Potter. He's a wizard, but he didn't know it until he turned eleven years old. Can you imagine finding out you have magical powers all of a sudden? It's so cool! Harry goes to this magical schoolcalled Hogwarts, and he makes friends with Ron and Hermione. They're the best friends ever!The movie is all about Harry and his friends going on a crazy adventure to find this magical stone. There are all kinds of magical creatures in the movie, like dragons, unicorns, and even trolls! And there's this super mean teacher called Snape who's always trying to stop Harry from finding the stone. But Harry is so brave and smart, he can handle anything!There are also magical spells in the movie that the wizards use to do all kinds of cool stuff. My favorite spell is "Wingardium Leviosa," which makes things fly in the air. Wouldn't it be so cool to be able to do that in real life?The special effects in the movie are amazing. The wizards can teleport from one place to another in a flash, and the Quidditch matches are so exciting to watch. Quidditch is this super cool sport that the wizards play on flying broomsticks. It looks so fun, I wish I could play it too!The movie also has a lot of funny moments that made me laugh out loud. Like when Ron tries to turn his pet rat into a goblet and it goes all wrong, or when Harry and his friends have to fight a giant troll in the school bathroom. It's so hilarious!Overall, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a magical adventure that you don't want to miss. It's full of friendship, bravery, and of course, magic! I can't wait to watch the next movie in the series and see what other adventures Harry and his friends go on. If you love wizards, magical creatures, and fun adventures, this movie is definitely for you!So grab your wand, hop on your broomstick, and get ready for a magical journey with Harry Potter. You won't be disappointed!篇5Title: My Review of Harry PotterHey guys! Today I'm going to tell you about a super awesome movie that I watched recently - Harry Potter! It's a movie about a boy named Harry who finds out he's a wizard and goes to a magical school called Hogwarts.First of all, let me tell you about the characters in the movie. Harry is super cool and brave, and he has two best friends, Hermione and Ron. They go on all sorts of adventures and face lots of challenges together. There are also some really mean characters like the evil wizard Voldemort, who wants to take over the wizarding world.The magic in the movie is so cool! They have spells and potions and flying broomsticks. I wish I could go to Hogwarts and learn how to do magic too. One of my favorite parts is when they play Quidditch, a super fun game played on broomsticks.The special effects in the movie are amazing. The school of Hogwarts looks so real, and the creatures like dragons and hippogriffs look really cool too. I was so impressed by how the filmmakers brought the magical world to life on screen.The story is really exciting and keeps you on the edge of your seat. There's always something happening and you never know what's going to happen next. I loved watching Harry and his friends solve mysteries and go on adventures.Overall, I give Harry Potter two thumbs up! It's a movie full of magic, excitement, and friendship. If you haven't seen it yet, you definitely have to check it out. You won't be disappointed!That's all for my review of Harry Potter. Thanks for reading, and I hope you enjoy the movie as much as I did! See you next time!篇6Title: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - An Awesome Movie!Hey guys, have you watched the movie called Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone? It's super cool and magical! Let me tell you all about it in this movie review.First of all, the story is about a boy named Harry Potter who finds out that he is a wizard on his 11th birthday. He goes to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry and learns how to do magic. How awesome is that?I really liked the characters in the movie, especially Harry, Hermione, and Ron. They are so brave and smart, and they make a great team! And let's not forget about the villains, like Professor Snape and He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named. They are really scary, but they make the movie so exciting!The special effects in the movie are also amazing. The flying broomsticks, the talking paintings, and the magical creatures like Fluffy the three-headed dog and the flying keys are all so cool! I wish I could do magic like that too!The movie is packed with adventure and action. From the troll in the dungeon to the giant chess game to the final battlewith He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, there is never a dull moment! I was on the edge of my seat the whole time!And let's not forget about the magic spells and potions. Wingardium Leviosa, Alohomora, Polyjuice Potion - they are all so fun to say! I wish I could cast spells like that in real life!Overall, Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone is an awesome movie that I would definitely recommend to all my friends. It's full of magic, adventure, and friendship, and it will make you want to be a wizard too! I can't wait to watch the next movie in the series!So, what are you waiting for? Grab some popcorn, gather your friends, and watch Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone today! It's a magical experience that you won't want to miss!篇7Title: Harry Potter Movie ReviewHey guys, have you seen the Harry Potter movies? If not, you’re missing out on some magical adventures! Let me tell you all about it in this Harry Potter movie review.First of all, let’s talk about the characters. Harry Potter, the main character, is a young wizard who goes to Hogwarts Schoolof Witchcraft and Wizardry. He has two best friends, Ron and Hermione, and together they go on all sorts of crazy adventures. There are also other characters like Dumbledore, the headmaster of Hogwarts, and Snape, the potions master who is always up to no good.The special effects in the Harry Potter movies are amazing! From flying on broomsticks to battling dragons, you will be blown away by the wizarding world. The magic spells and creatures are so cool, you will want to be a wizard yourself!The storyline in the Harry Potter movies is super exciting. Each movie follows Harry and his friends as they try to defeat the evil wizard Voldemort. There are twists and turns at every corner, and you will be on the edge of your seat the whole time. Plus, there are seven movies in total, so you can watch them all and see how the story unfolds.One of the best things about the Harry Potter movies is the friendship between Harry, Ron, and Hermione. They stick together through thick and thin, and show us the power of friendship. It’s heartwarming to see how they support each other and help each other out in tough situations.In conclusion, the Harry Potter movies are a must-watch for everyone, young and old. The magical world, exciting storylines,and lovable characters make it a movie series that you will never forget. So grab your wand and get ready for a magical journey with Harry Potter and his friends!That’s it for my Harry Potter movie review. I hope you all enjoyed it and are now excited to watch the movies. See you next time!篇8Title: My Awesome Review of Harry Potter!Hey guys! Today I’m gonna tell you all about this super cool movie I watched called Harry Potter. It’s about this kid named Harry who finds out he’s a w izard and goes to this magical school called Hogwarts. Let me tell you, it was so exciting!First off, the characters in this movie are all so awesome. Harry is like the coolest wizard ever, and his friends Hermione and Ron are just as awesome. They have the best adventures together and they always have each other’s backs. And don’t even get me started on the bad guys like Voldemort –they’re so scary but also really interesting.The special effects in this movie are totally mind-blowing. The magic spells and flying broomsticks look so real, it’s like you’re right there in the movie with them. And the Hogwarts castle is just so magical and amazing, I wish I could go to a school like that!The story in Harry Potter is super gripping too. There’s always something exciting happening, from Quidditch matches to battling evil monsters. Plus, there’s a mystery to solve in every movie, so it keeps you guessing till the end. And let me tell you, the ending of each movie is always so epic, it’ll leave you on the edge of your seat.Overall, I give Harry Potter two thumbs up! It’s such a fun and exciting movie that you’ll want to watch over and over again. So grab some popcorn, get comfy on the couch, and let the magic of Harry Potter take you on the adventure of a lifetime!篇9Harry Potter is like the coolest movie ever! It's about this boy named Harry who finds out he's a wizard and goes to a magical school called Hogwarts. There, he learns all sorts of cool spells and stuff while trying to defeat the evil wizard Voldemort.I really liked Harry because he's brave and always tries to do the right thing, even when it's hard. And his two best friends, Ron and Hermione, are super funny and help him out with all his adventures.The special effects in Harry Potter are amazing! The flying broomsticks, the spells, and all the magical creatures look so real.I wish I could go to Hogwarts and learn magic too!The bad guys in the movie are really scary, especially Voldemort. He's like the scariest villain ever! But Harry and his friends are able to defeat him in the end, which is so awesome.Overall, Harry Potter is a must-watch movie for anyone who loves magic and adventure. It's full of excitement, friendship, and bravery. I can't wait to watch the next movie in the series!篇10Title: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone - A Magical AdventureHi friends! Today I want to talk about a totally awesome movie that I watched recently. It's called "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" and it's all about this boy named Harry who goes to a school for wizards and learns all sorts of cool magic!In the movie, Harry finds out that he's actually a wizard and gets to go to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. He makes friends with Ron and Hermione, who are super cool and help him on his adventures. Together, they go on all sorts of crazy adventures like flying on broomsticks and battling trolls.One of the best parts of the movie is when Harry plays Quidditch, which is like a super cool sport played on broomsticks. It's so exciting to watch Harry zooming around and trying to catch the golden snitch. And let's not forget about the big final battle with the evil wizard Voldemort!The special effects in this movie are just amazing. The magic spells and potions look so real, and the Hogwarts castle is just magical. I wish I could go to a school like that!Overall, I think "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" is a must-watch movie for kids and adults alike. It's full of adventure, friendship, and magic, and it will make you believe in the power of imagination. I can't wait to watch the rest of the Harry Potter movies and go on more adventures with Harry, Ron, and Hermione!So grab your wand and get ready for a magical journey with Harry Potter!。
Judgment and Decision Making,V ol.10,No.6,November2015,pp.549–563On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshitGordon Pennycook∗James Allan Cheyne†Nathaniel Barr‡Derek J.Koehler†Jonathan A.Fugelsang†AbstractAlthough bullshit is common in everyday life and has attracted attention from philosophers,its reception(critical or ingen-uous)has not,to our knowledge,been subject to empirical investigation.Here we focus on pseudo-profound bullshit,which consists of seemingly impressive assertions that are presented as true and meaningful but are actually vacuous.We presented participants with bullshit statements consisting of buzzwords randomly organized into statements with syntactic structure but no discernible meaning(e.g.,“Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena”).Across multiple studies,the propensity to judge bull-shit statements as profound was associated with a variety of conceptually relevant variables(e.g.,intuitive cognitive style, supernatural belief).Parallel associations were less evident among profundity judgments for more conventionally profound(e.g.,“A wet person does not fear the rain”)or mundane(e.g.,“Newborn babies require constant attention”)statements.Theseresults support the idea that some people are more receptive to this type of bullshit and that detecting it is not merely a matter of indiscriminate skepticism but rather a discernment of deceptive vagueness in otherwise impressive sounding claims.Our re-sults also suggest that a bias toward accepting statements as true may be an important component of pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity.Keywords:bullshit,bullshit detection,dual-process theories,analytic thinking,supernatural beliefs,religiosity,conspiratorial ideation,complementary and alternative medicine.1Introduction“It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth.Producing bullshit requires no such con-viction.”–Harry FrankfurtIn On Bullshit,the philosopher Frankfurt(2005)defines bullshit as something that is designed to impress but that was constructed absent direct concern for the truth.This distinguishes bullshit from lying,which entails a deliberate manipulation and subversion of truth(as understood by the liar).There is little question that bullshit is a real and con-sequential phenomenon.Indeed,given the rise of commu-nication technology and the associated increase in the avail-ability of information from a variety of sources,both expert and otherwise,bullshit may be more pervasive than ever be-fore.Despite these seemingly commonplace observations, we know of no psychological research on bullshit.Are peo-ple able to detect blatant bullshit?Who is most likely to fall prey to bullshit and why?Funding for this study was provided by the Natural Sciences and En-gineering Research Council of Canada.Copyright:©2015.The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution3.0License.∗Department of Psychology,University of Waterloo,200Univer-sity Avenue West,Waterloo ON,Canada,N2L3G1.Email:gpen-nyco@uwaterloo.ca.†Department of Psychology,University of Waterloo.‡The School of Humanities and Creativity,Sheridan College.2Pseudo-profound bullshitThe Oxford English Dictionary defines bullshit as,simply,“rubbish”and“nonsense”,which unfortunately does not get to the core of bullshit.Consider the following statement:“Hidden meaning transforms unparalleled ab-stract beauty.”Although this statement may seem to convey some sort of potentially profound meaning,it is merely a collection of buzzwords put together randomly in a sentence that retains syntactic structure.The bullshit statement is not merely non-sense,as would also be true of the following,which is not bullshit:“Unparalleled transforms meaning beauty hiddenabstract”.The syntactic structure of a),unlike b),implies that it was constructed to communicate something.Thus,bullshit,in contrast to mere nonsense,is something that implies but does not contain adequate meaning or truth.This sort of phenomenon is similar to what Buekens and Boudry(2015) referred to as obscurantism(p.1):“[when]the speaker... [sets]up a game of verbal smoke and mirrors to suggest depth and insight where none exists.”Our focus,however,is somewhat different from what is found in the philosophy of bullshit and related phenomena(e.g.,Black,1983;Buekens &Boudry,2015;Frankfurt;2005).Whereas philosophers549have been primarily concerned with the goals and intentions of the bullshitter,we are interested in the factors that pre-dispose one to become or to resist becoming a bullshittee. Moreover,this sort of bullshit–which we refer to here as pseudo-profound bullshit–may be one of many different types.We focus on pseudo-profound bullshit because it rep-resents a rather extreme point on what could be considered a spectrum of bullshit.We can say quite confidently that the above example(a)is bullshit,but one might also label an exaggerated story told over drinks to be bullshit.In future studies on bullshit,it will be important to define the type of bullshit under investigation(see Discussion for further com-ment on this issue).Importantly,pseudo-profound bullshit is not trivial.For a real-world example of pseudo-profound bullshit and an ap-plication of our logic,consider the following:“Attention and intention are the mechanics ofmanifestation.”This statement bears a striking resemblance to(a),but is (presumably)not a random collection of words.Rather,it is an actual“tweet”sent by Deepak Chopra,M.D.,who has authored numerous books with titles such as Quantum Heal-ing(Chopra,1989)and The Soul of Leadership(Chopra, 2008)and who has been accused of furthering“woo-woo nonsense”(i.e.,pseudo-profound bullshit; e.g.,Shermer, 2010).The connection between(a)and(c)is not inci-dental,as(a)was derived using the very buzzwords from Chopra’s“Twitter”feed.1The vagueness of(c)indicates that it may have been constructed to impress upon the reader some sense of profundity at the expense of a clear exposition of meaning or truth.Despite the lack of direct concern for truth noted by Frankfurt(2005),pseudo-profound bullshit betrays a con-cern for verisimilitude or truthiness.We argue that an im-portant adjutant of pseudo-profound bullshit is vagueness which,combined with a generally charitable attitude toward ambiguity,may be exacerbated by the nature of recent me-dia.As a prime example,the necessary succinctness and rapidity of“Twitter”(140characters per“Tweet”)may be particularly conducive to the promulgation of bullshit.Im-portantly,vagueness and meaning are,by definition,at cross purposes,as the inclusion of vagueness obscures the mean-ing of the statement and therefore must undermine or mask “deep meaning”(i.e.,profundity)that the statement purports to convey.The concern for“profundity”reveals an impor-tant defining characteristic of bullshit(in general):that it attempts to impress rather than to inform;to be engaging rather than instructive.1This example came from .See Method section of Study1for further details.3Bullshit receptivityWhat might cause someone to erroneously rate pseudo-profound bullshit as profound?In our view,there are two candidate mechanisms that might explain a general“recep-tivity”to bullshit.Thefirst mechanism relates to the pos-sibility that some people may have a stronger bias toward accepting things as true or meaningful from the outset.Ac-cording to Gilbert(1991,following Spinoza),humans must first believe something to comprehend it.In keeping with this hypothesis,Gilbert,Tafarodi and Malone(1993)found that depleting cognitive resources caused participants to er-roneously believe information that was tagged as false.This indicates that people have a response bias toward accepting something as true.This asymmetry between belief and un-belief may partially explain the prevalence of bullshit;we are biased toward accepting bullshit as true and it there-fore requires additional processing to overcome this bias. Nonetheless,it should be noted that previous work on belief and doubt focused on meaningful propositions such as“The heart produces all mental activity.”The startling possibility with respect to pseudo-profound bullshit is that people will first accept the bullshit as true(or meaningful)and,depend-ing on downstream cognitive mechanisms such as conflict detection(discussed below),either retain a default sense of meaningfulness or invoke deliberative reasoning to assess the truth(or meaningfulness)of the proposition.In terms of individual differences,then,it is possible that some indi-viduals approach pseudo-profound bullshit with a stronger initial expectation for meaningfulness.However,since this aspect of bullshit receptivity relates to one’s mindset when approaching(or being approached with)bullshit,it is there-fore not specific to bullshit.Nonetheless,it may be an im-portant component of bullshit receptivity.Put differently, some individuals may have an excessively“open”mind that biases them to make inflated judgments of profundity,re-gardless of the content.The second mechanism relates to a potential inability to detect bullshit,which may cause one to confuse vagueness for profundity.In the words of Sperber(2010):“All too often,what readers do is judge profound what they have failed to grasp”(p.583).Here,the bullshittee is simply un-aware that the relevant stimulus requires special considera-tion.This mechanism is linked to what has been labelled as “conflict monitoring”failures(e.g.,De Neys,2014;Penny-cook,Fugelsang&Koehler,2015).In the context of reason-ing research,for example,conflict monitoring is necessary when two sources of information in a problem cue conflict-ing responses(e.g.,logical validity and conclusion believ-ability in a syllogism).Recent research indicates that peo-ple are capable of detecting these sorts of conflicts(see De Neys,2012for a review),but that conflict monitoring fail-ures are nonetheless an important source of bias in reason-ing and decision making(Pennycook,Fugelsang&Koehler,2015).Moreover,conflict detection is viewed as an im-portant low-level cognitive factor that causes at least some people to engage deliberative,analytic reasoning processes (Pennycook,Fugelsang&Koehler,2015).With respect to bullshit,there are likely many factors that may lead an in-dividual to successfully detect the need for skepticism that will depend on the type of bullshit encountered and the bull-shit context.For example,the source(perhaps a known bullshitter)may be particularly untrustworthy.Or,perhaps, the bullshit may conflict with common knowledge or spe-cific knowledge or expertise of the recipient.For the present investigation,we focus on pseudo-profound bullshit that is missing any obvious external cue that skepticism is required. The goal is to investigate whether there are consistent and meaningful individual differences in the ability to sponta-neously discern or detect pseudo-profound bullshit.Unlike response bias,this mechanism involves distinguishing bull-shit from non-bullshit.4The current investigationHere we report four studies in which we ask participants to rate pseudo-profound bullshit and other statements on a profundity scale.Our primary goal is to establish this as a legitimate measure of bullshit receptivity.For this,bull-shit profundity ratings are correlated with a collection of in-dividual difference factors that are conceptually related to pseudo-profound bullshit in a variety of ways.4.1Analytic thinkingDual-process theories of reasoning and decision making dis-tinguish between intuitive(“Type1”)processes that are au-tonomously cued and reflective(“Type2”)processes that are effortful,typically deliberative,and require working mem-ory(Evans&Stanovich,2013).A crucialfinding that has emerged from the dual-process literature is that the ability to reason involves a discretionary aspect(Stanovich,2011; Stanovich&West,2000);a distinction that has long histori-cal precedent(Baron,1985).Namely,to be a good reasoner, one must have both the capacity to do whatever computa-tion is necessary(i.e.,cognitive ability,intelligence)and the willingness to engage deliberative reasoning processes(i.e., analytic cognitive style;thinking disposition).Moreover, individual differences in analytic cognitive style are posi-tively correlated with conflict detection effects in reason-ing research(Pennycook,Cheyne,Barr,Koehler&Fugel-sang,2014;Pennycook,et al.,2015),indicating that more analytic individuals are either better able to detect conflict during reasoning or are more responsive to such conflict. Consistent with Sagan’s(1996)argument that critical think-ing facilitates“baloney detection”,we posit that reflective thinking should be linked to bullshit receptivity,such that people who are better at solving reasoning problems should be more likely to consider the specific meaning of the pre-sented statements(or lack thereof)and judge failure to dis-cern meaning as a possible defect of the statement rather than of themselves.In other words,more analytic individ-uals should be more likely to detect the need for additional scrutiny when exposed to pseudo-profound bullshit.More intuitive individuals,in contrast,should respond based on a sort offirst impression,which will be inflated due to the vagueness of the pseudo-profound bullshit.Analytic think-ing is thus the primary focus of our investigation,as it is most directly related to the proposed ability to detect blatant bullshit.4.2Ontological confusionsBoth children and adults tend to confuse aspects of real-ity(i.e.,“core knowledge”)in systematic ways(Lindeman, Svedholm-Hakkinen&Lipsanen,2015).Any category mis-take involving property differences between animate and inanimate or mental and physical,as examples,constitutes an ontological confusion.Consider the belief that prayers have the capacity to heal(i.e.,spiritual healing).Such beliefs are taken to result from conflation of mental phe-nomenon,which are subjective and immaterial,and physical phenomenon,which are objective and material(Lindeman, Svedholm-Hakkinen&Lipsanen,2015).On a dual-process view,ontological confusions constitute a failure to reflect on and inhibit such intuitive ontological confusions(Sved-holm&Lindeman,2013).Ontological confusions may also be supported by a bias toward believing the literal truth of statements.Thus,ontological confusions are conceptually related to both detection and response bias as mechanisms that may underlie bullshit receptivity.As such,the propen-sity to endorse ontological confusions should be linked to higher levels of bullshit receptivity.4.3Epistemically suspect beliefsBeliefs that conflict with common naturalistic conceptions of the world have been labelled epistemically suspect(e.g., Lobato et al.,2014;Pennycook,Fugelsang&Koehler,in press).For example,the belief in angels(and the corre-sponding belief that they can move through walls)conflicts with the common folk-mechanical belief that things cannot pass through solid objects(Pennycook et al.,2014).Epis-temically suspect beliefs,once formed,are often accompa-nied by an unwillingness to critically reflect on such be-liefs.Indeed,reflective thinkers are less likely to be re-ligious and paranormal believers(e.g.,Gervais&Noren-zayan,2012;Pennycook et al.,2012;Shenhav,Rand& Greene,2012),and are less likely to engage in conspira-torial ideation(Swami et al.,2014)or believe in the effi-cacy of alternative medicine(Browne et al.,2015;Linde-man,2011).Ontological confusions are also more com-mon among believers in the supernatural(e.g.,Lindeman, Svedholm-Hakkinen&Lipsanen,2015;Svedholm&Lin-deman,2013).Although epistemically suspect claims may or may not themselves qualify as bullshit,the lack of skepti-cism that underlies the acceptance of epistemically suspect claims should also promote positive bullshit receptivity.5Study1We presented participants with ten statements that have syn-tactic structure but that consist of a series of randomly se-lected vague buzzwords.Participants were asked to indicate the relative profundity of each statement on a scale from 1(not at all profound)to5(very profound).We argue that high ratings indicate receptivity toward bullshit.Par-ticipants also completed a series of relevant cognitive and demographic questions.6MethodIn all studies,we report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions,and all measures.6.1ParticipantsUniversity of Waterloo undergraduates(N=280,58male, 222female,M age=20.9,SD age=4.8)volunteered to take part in the study in return for course credit.Only partici-pants who reported that English is theirfirst language(on a separate pre-screen questionnaire)were allowed to partic-ipate.The sample size was the maximum amount allowed for online studies in the University of Waterloo participant pool.This study was run over two semesters.One of the participants was removed due to a large num-ber of skipped questions.Participants were also given an attention check.For this,participants were shown a list of activities(e.g.,biking,reading)directly below the following instructions:“Below is a list of leisure activities.If you are reading this,please choose the“other”box below and type in‘I read the instructions’”.This attention check proved rather difficult with35.4%of the sample failing(N=99). However,the results were similar if these participants were excluded.We therefore retained the full data set.6.2MaterialsTen novel meaningless statements were derived from two websites and used to create a Bullshit Receptivity(BSR) scale.Thefirst,,constructs meaningless statements with appropriate syntactic struc-ture by randomly mashing together a list of words used in Deepak Chopra’s tweets(e.g.,“Imagination is inside expo-nential space time events”).The second,“The New Age Bullshit Generator”(/bullshit/),works on the same principle but uses a list of profound-sounding words compiled by its author,Seb Pearce(e.g.,“We are in the midst of a self-aware blossoming of being that will align us with the nexus itself”).A full list of items for the BSR scale can be found in Table S1in the supplement.The fol-lowing instructions were used for the scale:We are interested in how people experience theprofound.Below are a series of statements takenfrom relevant websites.Please read each state-ment and take a moment to think about what itmight mean.Then please rate how“profound”you think it is.Profound means“of deep mean-ing;of great and broadly inclusive significance.”Participants rated profoundness on the following5-point scale:1=Not at all profound,2=somewhat profound,3= fairly profound,4=definitely profound,5=very profound.A bullshit receptivity score was the mean of the profound-ness ratings for all bullshit items.At the beginning of the study(following demographic questions),participants completedfive cognitive tasks in-tended to assess individual differences in analytic cognitive style and components of cognitive ability.The Cognitive Reflection Test(CRT;Frederick,2005)consists of3math-ematical word problems that cue an incorrect intuitive re-sponse.The CRT has been shown to reflect the tendency to avoid miserly cognitive processing(Campitelli&Gerrans, 2013;Toplak,West&Stanovich,2011),presumably be-cause those with an analytic cognitive style are more likely to question or avoid the intuitive response.We also in-cluded a recent4-item addition to the CRT(Toplak,West &Stanovich,2014).The7-item CRT measure had accept-able internal consistency(Cronbach’sα=.74).As an additional measure of reflective thinking,we in-cluded a“heuristics and biases”battery(Toplak et al.,2011). The heuristics and biases battery involves a series of ques-tions derived from Kahneman and Tversky,such as the gam-bler’s fallacy and the conjunction fallacy(Kahneman,2011). Much like the CRT,each item cues an incorrect intuitive re-sponse based on a common heuristic or bias.However,the heuristics and biases task was not as reliable(α=.59).This likely reflects the fact that the heuristics and biases items are more diverse than are the CRT problems.We also included two cognitive ability measures.We as-sessed verbal intelligence using a12-item version of the Wordsum test.For this,participants were presented with words and asked to select from a list the word that most closely matches its meaning(e.g.,CLOISTERED was pre-sented with miniature,bunched,arched,malady,secluded). The Wordsum has been used in many studies(see Malhotra, Krosnick&Haertel,2007for a review),including the Gen-Table1:Pearson product-moment correlations(Study1;N=279).BSR=Bullshit Receptivity scale;CRT=Cognitive Reflection Test.Cronbach’s alphas are reported in brackets.∗∗∗p<.001,**p<.01,∗p<.05.12345671.BSR(.82)2.CRT−.33∗∗∗(.74)3.Heuristics/biases−.28∗∗∗.50∗∗∗(.59)4.Verbal intelligence−.37∗∗∗.41∗∗∗.31∗∗∗(.65)5.Numeracy−.13∗.38∗∗∗.27∗∗∗.30∗∗∗(.47)6.Ontological confusions.31∗∗∗−.33∗∗∗−.38∗∗∗−.26∗∗∗−.16∗∗(.74)7.Religious belief.27∗∗∗−.21∗∗∗−.20∗∗−.15∗−.17∗∗.29∗∗∗(.94)eral Social Survey(starting in1974).The Wordsum mea-sure had acceptable reliability(α=.65).We also assessed numeracy using a3-item measure(Schwartz,Woloshin, Black&Welch,1997).The frequently used3-item nu-meracy scale is strongly related to an expanded and more difficult7-item numeracy scale,suggesting that both scales loaded on a single construct(labelled“global numeracy”by Lipkus,Samsa,and Rimer,2001).However,we em-ployed the shorter3-item version for expediency,but it did not achieve acceptable reliability(α=.47).We used a14-item ontological confusions scale(Linde-man&Aarnio,2007;Lindeman,et al.,2008;Svedholm &Lindeman,2013),translated into English from Finnish. Participants were given the following instructions:“Do you think the following statements can be literally true,the way a sentence such as‘Wayne Gretzky was a hockey player’is true?Or are they true only in a metaphorical sense,like the expression‘Friends are the salt of life’?”.They were then presented items such as“A rock lives for a long time”and asked to rate how metaphorical/literal the statement is on the following scale:1=fully metaphorical,2=more metaphorical than literal,3=in between,4=more literal than metaphorical,5=fully literal.Those who rate the statements as more literal are considered more ontologically confused.Participants were also given3metaphors(e.g.,“An anxious person is a prisoner to their anxiety”)and3lit-eral statements(e.g.,“Flowing water is a liquid”)asfiller items that did not factor into the mean ontological confu-sion score.The ontological confusions scale had acceptable internal consistency(α=.74).Finally,participants completed an8-item religious belief questionnaire(Pennycook et al.,2014).Participants were asked to rate their level of agreement/disagreement(1–strongly disagree to5–strongly agree)with8commonly held religious beliefs(afterlife,heaven,hell,miracles,an-gels,demons,soul,Satan).The scale had excellent internal consistency(α=.94).6.3ProcedureFollowing a short demographic questionnaire,participants completed the tasks in the following order:heuristics and biases battery,Wordsum,numeracy,CRT2,CRT1,ontolog-ical confusion scale,bullshit receptivity,and religious belief questionnaire.7ResultsThe Bullshit Receptivity(BSR)scale had good internal con-sistency(α=.82).A summary of descriptive statistics for each item and the full BSR scale is reported in Table S1. The mean profoundness rating was2.6,which is in-between “somewhat profound”and“fairly profound”on the5-point scale.Indeed,the mean profoundness rating for each item was significantly greater than2(“somewhat profound”),all t’s>5.7,all p’s<.001,indicating that our items successfully elicited a sense of profoundness on the aggregate.Moreover, only18.3%(N=51)of the sample had a mean rating less than2.A slight majority of the sample’s mean ratings fell on or in-between2and3(54.5%,N=152)and over a quar-ter of the sample(27.2%,N=76)gave mean ratings higher than3(“fairly profound”).These results indicate that our participants largely failed to detect that the statements are bullshit.Next we investigate the possible association between re-flective thinking and bullshit receptivity.Pearson product-moment correlations can be found in Table1.BSR was strongly negatively correlated with each cognitive measure except for numeracy(which was nonetheless significant). Furthermore,both ontological confusions and religious be-lief were positively correlated with bullshit receptivity.8Study2In Study1,at least some participants appeared tofind mean-ing in a series of statements that contained a random collec-tion of vague buzzwords organized in a sentence with syn-tactic structure.This tendency was significantly related to cognitive variables of conceptual interest in expected ways. In Study2we set out to replicate this pattern of results us-ing real-world examples of bullshit.For this,we created an additional scale using particularly vague“tweets”from Deepak Chopra’s“Twitter”account(see Table S2).We also expanded our measures of analytic cognitive style by includ-ing self-report measures of analytic and intuitive thinking disposition.Finally,we expanded our cognitive ability mea-sures by increasing the number of items on the numeracy test and including a common measure offluid intelligence. 9Method9.1ParticipantsA total of198participants(98male,100female,M age= 36,SD age=11.4)were recruited from Amazon’s Mechan-ical Turk in return for pay.Only American residents were permitted to sign up for the study.All participants reported speakingfluent English.Given the novelty of the phe-nomenon,we chose200participants as an arbitrary target sample size,as we determined this would provide adequate power and stability of the correlations.These data were not analyzed until the full sample was completed.Eleven participants were removed because they re-sponded affirmatively when asked if they responded ran-domly at any time during the study.In addition,23partic-ipants failed at least one of three attention check questions. The instruction check questions included the one used in Study1as well as the following question inserted into ques-tionnaires at the middle and end of the survey:“I have been to every country in the world”(all participants who selected any option but“strongly disagree”were removed).How-ever,as in Study1,the results were similar when these par-ticipants were excluded and we therefore retained the full sample.9.2MaterialsIn addition to the10meaningless statements used in Study 1,we obtained10novel items from http://wisdomofchopra. com and /bullshit/.As noted,we also obtained10items from Deepak Chopra’s Twitter feed (/deepakchopra; e.g.“Nature is a self-regulating ecosystem of awareness”).These items can be found in Table S2.We excluded hash tags and expanded any shortened words and abbreviations,but the tweets were not otherwise altered.We emphasize that we deliberately selected tweets that seemed vague and,therefore,the se-lected statements should not be taken as representative of Chopra’s tweet history or body of work.Also,to reiter-ate,we focus on Chopra here merely because others have claimed that some of the things that he has written seem like “woo-woo nonsense”(e.g.,Shermer,2010)and because of the connection between these claims and the bullshit gen-erator websites that we used.None of this is intended to imply that every statement in Chopra’s tweet history is bull-shit.Participants were given the same instructions as Study 1and,therefore,we did not indicate the author of the state-ments.Participants completed one cognitive task and one self-report questionnaire intended to assess individual differ-ences in analytic cognitive style.Participants were given the heuristics and biases battery(as in Study1;α=.75)along with Pacini and Epstein’s(1999)Rational-Experiential In-ventory.The latter includes the20-item Need for Cognition (NFC)scale and the20-item Faith in Intuition scale(FI). Both scales had excellent reliability:α=.93(NFC)and.94 (FI).Participants were given questions such as“reasoning things out carefully is not one of my strong points”(NFC, reverse scored)and“I like to rely on my intuitive impres-sions”(FI).They were asked to respond based on a5point scale from1-Definitely not true of myself to5-Definitely true of myself.To assess cognitive ability,we retained the Wordsum(α=.63),and the numeracy test from Study1.However,given the low reliability for the3-item numeracy test in Study1, we used an additional6items(Lipkus et al.,2001),which lead to better reliability for the full9-item scale(α=.63). We also added a short form of Raven’s Advanced Progres-sive Matrices(APM)that consists of12problems.The APM are a widely used measure offluid intelligence and the short form has been validated in multiple studies(Arthur& Day,1994;Chiesi,Ciancaleoni,Galli,Morsanyi&Primi, 2012).It had acceptable internal consistency in our sample (α=.69).We used the same ontological confusion(α=.75)and re-ligious belief measure(α=.96)as in Study1.Finally,we administered the Paranormal Belief Scale(Tobacyk,2004; Pennycook et al.,2012)with the religious belief items ex-cluded.The scale consisted of22items sampled from6cat-egories of supernatural belief(example items in parenthe-ses):Psi(“Mind reading is possible”),Witchcraft(“Witches do exist”),Omens of luck(“Black cats can bring bad luck”), Spiritualism(“It is possible to communicate with the dead”), Extraordinary life forms(“The Loch Ness monster of Scot-land exists”)and Precognition(“Astrology is a way to ac-curately predict the future”).The full scale had excellent internal consistency(α=.96).Participants also completed wealth distribution and polit-ical ideology measures.These measures were included as part of separate investigations and will not be analyzed or discussed further.。
中英文对照学习版Harry Potter and Philosopher’s Stone《哈利波特与魔法石》CHAPTER FourThe Keep of the Keys第四章钥匙保管员B OOM. They knocked again. Dudl ey jerked awake.轰!又是捶门声。
达力惊醒了。
‘Where’s the cannon?’ he said stupidly.“什么地方打炮?”达力迷迷糊糊地说。
There was a crash behind them and Uncl e Vernon came skid ding into the room. He was hol ding a rifl e in his hands - now they knew what had been in the l ong, thin package he had brought with them.他们背后又是哗啦一声响。
弗农姨父抱着一支来复枪连滚带爬地跑进屋,这时他们才明白他那细长的包裹里原来是什么东西。
‘Who's there?' he shouted. 'I warn you - I'm armed!’“门外是什么人?”他喊道,“我警告你─我有枪!”There was a pause. Then -外面静了一会儿。
然后─SMASH!咔嚓!The d oor was hit with such force that it swung cl ean off its hinges and with a d eafening crash land ed flat on the fl oor.门从合页上脱落下来,震耳欲聋的哗啦一声,门板摔在地上。
A giant of a man was standing in the d oorway. His face was almost compl etely hid d en by a long, shaggy mane of hair and a wild, tangl ed beard, but you could make out his eyes, glinting like black beetles under all the hair.门口站着一个彪形大汉。
哈利波特英语Harry Potter is a series of fantasy novels written by British author J.K. Rowling. The series follows young wizard Harry Potter as he navigates life at the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, battles evil forces, and uncovers the truth about his family and world. It has become one of the most beloved and successful book series of all time, spawning a billion-dollar movie franchise, theme parks, merchandise, and a passionate fandom.The first book, Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (or Sorcerer's Stone in the US), was published in 1997, and it quickly became a sensation. Set in a magical world populated by witches, wizards, and various magical creatures, the book introduced readers to Harry, an orphaned boy who discovers he is a wizard and is whisked away to a hidden school of magic. There, he makes friends with Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, and they embark on a series of exciting adventures as they try to uncover the mystery behind an elusive magical object called the Philosopher's Stone.The subsequent books in the series – Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Harry Potter and the Order of Phoenix, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – continue to follow Harry as he grows up, battles the evil wizard Lord Voldemort, and ultimately uncovers the truth about his family and destiny.One of the key themes of the Harry Potter books is the power of love and friendship. Harry's friendships with Ron and Hermione are integral to his success in defeating Voldemort, and the love between Harry's parents also plays a crucial role in the story. Another theme is the importance of standingup to injustice and fighting for what is right, as Harry and his friends often find themselves facing corruption and discrimination within the wizarding world.The popularity of the Harry Potter series has had a profound impact on popular culture, inspiring countless imitations and homages. It has also been subject to criticism for everything from promoting witchcraft and magic to being too violent or depressing, but its fans have remained steadfast in their love for the books, and the series remains an enduring cultural touchstone.。
扯淡英语怎么说扯淡本意是淡化,比较浓的东西,一扯开就淡了。
经过后人附会演变,就有了闲扯、胡说、犯贫、不相干的意思。
那么,你知道扯淡的英文怎么说吗扯淡的英文释义:talk nonsense; chatnonsense扯淡的英文例句:我想跟他谈所有这一切都是扯淡。
I wanted to tell him that all this was so much nonsense.这完全是扯淡。
This is to talk nonsense completely.管理扯淡的熊市已经过去。
The bear market in management bullshit is over.有人需要告诉他没和他扯淡。
Someone needs to tell him this is not a crapshoot.这完全是瞎扯淡。
This is complete bullshit.两个小伙子在酒吧里扯淡,抱怨他们的妻子。
Two guys are chatting in a bar, complaining about their wives.这事太扯淡了,切尔西的消息人士说。
It was a bit of horseplay that went seriously wrong, said a Chelsea source.这份关于扯淡的就源于那种斗争。
The essay on [bull] arose from that kind of struggle.一场关于加缪的讨论会本身就是扯淡。
A symposium on Camus is a lie.这个社会不是法治,而是扯淡的人治。
This society isnt ruled by law, but by peoples whims.那完全是扯淡,别信他!Thats sheer nonsense,dont believe him.阿凡达突然让我意识到,我们电影的情怀和简单的美好距离有多远;我们和清澈的纯真距离有多远;我们和炙热的梦想距离有多远;一直在扭曲阴暗扯淡的纠结的庸俗中奔走狂欢的我们,距离到真诚,还有多远!I suddenly realized how far away our films are from simple beauty, crystal-clearpurity and passionate dreams.不,他根本就不信这些扯淡。
中英文对照学习版Harry Potter and Philosopher’s Stone《哈利波特与魔法石》CHAPTER SevenThe Sorting Hat第七章分院帽The d oor swung open at once. A tall, black-haired witch in emeral d-green robes stood there. She had a very stern face and Harry’s first thought was that this was not someone to cross.大门立时洞开。
一个身穿翠绿色长袍的高个儿黑发女巫站在大门前。
她神情严肃,哈利首先想到的是这个人可不好对付。
‘The firs’-years, Professor McGonagall,” said Hagrid.“一年级新生,麦格教授。
”海格说。
‘Thank you, Hagrid. I will take them from here.’“谢谢你,海格。
到这里就交给我来接走。
”She pull ed the d oor wide. The Entrance Hall was so big you coul d have fitted the whol e of the Dursleys’house in it. The stone walls were lit with flaming torches like the ones at Gringotts, the ceiling was too high to make out, and a magnificent marbl e stairase facing them l ed to the upper fl oors.她把门拉得大开。
门厅大得能把德思礼家整栋房子搬进去。
像古灵阁一样,石墙周围都是熊熊燃烧的火把。
论扯淡
On Bullshit
Harry G Frankfurt
南方朔译
序赵汀阳
译者序南方朔
论扯淡
趣读一孙涤
趣读二苏友贞
论扯淡
在我们的文化里,最突出的特征之一就是:有太多的人在“扯淡”。
这点谁都明白。
每个人都有份。
但我们却认为这种情况是理所当然的。
大多数人都相信自己有能耐分辨出谁在扯淡,不会被人糊弄,因而人们并不真正关注这一现象,也激发不了持久的讨论。
因此,什么是扯淡?为什么有那么多人在扯淡?扯淡究竟有什么作用?对这些问题我们并不清楚,而且就扯淡对我们的意义而言,也缺乏认真的评价。
换句话说,对扯淡,我们缺少理论。
我打算开始逐步阐明扯淡问题的理论观点,主要是提出一些尝试性与探讨性的哲学分析。
在修辞手法和错误用法中的扯淡不在我的考虑范围之内。
我的目的很简单,就是要对何谓扯淡做出概括解释,区分出扯淡和不扯淡有何不同,并已多少有点不同的方式,明白地勾勒出扯淡这个概念的结构。
扯淡的构成在逻辑上有什么充分且必要的条件?对这个问题的任何解释多少都有些武断。
一方面,当人们用“扯淡”这个说法时,通常都很随意——只是一句泛泛的骂人话,并没有字面上的
特别意义;另一方面,这种现象本身太宽泛,难以归类,任何对其概念做出的清晰明快的分析,都会变成削足适履。
但尽管如此,虽然不太可能得到定论,虽然有贯彻党的最基本问题仍然存在,不但未被解答,甚至无人问询;可是去做一些有益的讨论,应当是可能的。
介绍哈利波特的英语作文150词全文共6篇示例,供读者参考篇1Harry Potter is the Best Book Series Ever!Hi everyone! My name is Tommy and I'm 10 years old. Today I want to tell you all about the most amazing book series in the entire world - Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling! I just finished reading all 7 books and they were so awesome, I can't stop thinking about them. Get ready, because I'm going to tell you everything that's so great about Harry Potter!First, let me give you some background on the story. Harry Potter is a young wizard who lives in the ordinary human (or "Muggle") world with his mean aunt and uncle after his parents were killed by the evil wizard Voldemort. But on his 11th birthday, Harry finds out that he's actually a wizard too and gets invited to attend the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry!At Hogwarts, Harry makes two best friends named Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Ron comes from a cool wizarding family with red hair and lots of brothers and sisters. Hermione is a Muggle-born witch who is super smart and goodat magic. Together they go on all kinds of adventures and have to keep fighting off Voldemort and his scary Death Eater followers who want to take over the wizard world.There's so much awesome stuff at Hogwarts that I'm jealous I can't go there for real! The castle is huge with moving staircases, talking portraits, and ghosts floating around. Harry takes classes to learn magic spells, potions, herbology (studying magical plants), and even how to fly on broomsticks for the wizard sport Quidditch.Quidditch is probably the coolest fictional sport ever invented. It's kind of like basketball mixed with rugby, except it's played flying around on broomsticks high up in the air! Each team has seven players: three Chasers who score points by throwing a ball (the Quaffle) through big hoops, two Beaters who protect their team by hitting other players with small heavy balls (the Bludgers), a Keeper who guards the hoops, and a Seeker (Harry's position) who has to catch a tiny golden ball called the Snitch to end the game. Harry is an amazing Seeker and Quidditch matches are always so intense and exciting in the books.Besides the awesomeness of the wizarding world, another reason I love Harry Potter is the characters. Harry is such a braveand loyal friend, always willing to risk everything to do what's right and protect the people he cares about. Ron can be a bit goofy but he's funny and such a good mate. Hermione is the brilliant brains helping them out of every jam. And Harry's godfather Sirius Black is the coolest adult character - he's an escaped convict but he's actually a good guy.But my favorite character is definitely Dobby the house-elf. Dobby is this tiny elf creature who is a servant to the evil Malfoy family at first. Even though he has to punish himself for disobeying orders, Dobby goes behind their backs to secretly help Harry multiple times because he's just such a good person. When Harry tricks the Malfoys into freeing Dobby, it's the happiest moment ever! Dobby is hilarious with his extremely formal manners and he's so loyal and brave. I wish I had a friend like Dobby.The Harry Potter books get darker and more intense as the series goes on, especially once Voldemort comes back to power in the 4th book. Harry and his friends face life-or-death situations against the Death Eaters, dementors (soul-sucking ghostlike creatures), werewolves, and all kinds of other scary dangers. But they keep fighting hard against Voldemort's growing darkness and never give up hope. It all builds up to anepic final battle in the 7th book where Harry has to make a terrible sacrifice to save the wizard world once and for all.I can't really put into words why these books are so awesome and meaningful to me. The whole wizarding world feels just as real and vivid as our own. The magic system is so cool and intricate, whether it's casting spells, making potions, using enchanted objects, or transforming into an Animagus animal form. The stories take you on such an emotional journey of excitement, mystery, friendship, bravery and just never knowing what crazy adventure is coming next.More than anything though, I think kids (and everyone really) are drawn to the timeless themes in Harry Potter - good vs. evil, overcoming darkness, the power of love and friendship, and fighting for what's right even against impossible odds. Harry and his friends go through SO MUCH struggle and heartbreak, but they stick by each other through thick and thin and end up as heroes who save the world. What kid doesn't dream about going on an epic adventure like that with their best friends by their side?If you haven't read the Harry Potter books yet, you are seriously missing out and I feel bad for you! Do yourself a favor and read them right now because they are the most magical,spellbinding, cant-put-them-down books you'll ever experience. Even after all these years, millions of kids and adults re-read them over and over because the Harry Potter series is just that awesome. I already can't wait to read the whole series again!篇2Harry Potter: The Boy Who LivedHave you ever wished you could do magic? Well, in the Harry Potter books, there's a whole world of witches and wizards who can cast spells and make all sorts of amazing things happen! The star of the series is a young wizard named Harry Potter.Harry was just a baby when his parents were killed by an evil dark wizard called Voldemort. Luckily, Harry survived, but he was left with a lightning-shaped scar on his forehead. His aunt and uncle, the Dursleys, had to take him in, but they were horrible to him because they hated anything to do with magic.On his 11th birthday, Harry got an incredible surprise – he was a wizard too! A giant named Hagrid came and told him all about the wizarding world and took him to buy his school supplies like a magic wand, spellbooks, and even a pet owl! Harry was going to attend Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.At Hogwarts, Harry made two best friends – Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Together, they got into all kinds of adventures and mischief. They had to deal with mean teachers, three-headed dogs, a troll, and even Voldemort trying to come back to life! But with bravery, friendship, and a little magic, they always managed to save the day.In later books, Harry learned more advanced magic and faced even greater dangers like dementors (evil creatures that feed on happiness), a dangerous tournament between wizarding schools, and an all-out wizarding war against Voldemort and his followers. But no matter what, Harry never gave up. He was brave, loyal to his friends, and determined to defeat the dark forces.The Harry Potter books are so much fun because they take you into this whole other world of castles, spells, magical creatures, and sports played on broomsticks! You get to imagine what it would be like to be a student at Hogwarts, learn potions and charms, and maybe even join Harry, Ron and Hermione on one of their amazing adventures.Harry Potter is an ordinary boy who finds out he's actually a wizard with an extraordinary destiny. The series shows that even if you're small or come from a difficult background, you can stillaccomplish great things with courage, friendship, and believing in yourself. Maybe there's a little magic inside all of us too!篇3Harry Potter is the Most Amazing Book Series Ever!Have you read the Harry Potter books? If not, you are really missing out! The Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling is my absolute favorite. It's about a young wizard named Harry Potter who has to battle evil wizards and dark forces. But it's so much more than that too!The story begins when Harry is just a baby. His parents are killed by the most evil wizard of all time, Voldemort. But when Voldemort tries to kill Harry too using an extremely powerful curse, it doesn't work! The curse rebounds off baby Harry and hits Voldemort instead, destroying his body. This leaves a lightning bolt-shaped scar on Harry's forehead.Since Harry's parents are gone, he gets sent to live with his mean aunt and uncle, the Dursleys. They treat him terribly and make him sleep in a tiny cupboard under the stairs. On his 11th birthday, everything changes when Harry finds out he is actually a wizard! A giant named Hagrid comes and tells him the truth about his parents and himself.Hagrid takes Harry to a magical world filled with witches, wizards, and all sorts of enchanting things – like wands, spell books, magic potions, dragons, ghosts, and so much more. Harry gets to go to Hogwarts, which is a school for young wizards to learn magic. There, he makes two best friends named Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Together, they go on the most unbelievable adventures!At Hogwarts, Harry takes classes to learn charms, transfiguration, herbology, potions, defense against the dark arts, and other kinds of magic. His teachers include mentors like Professor Dumbledore, Professor McGonagall, and even the ghostly Professor Binns. But not all of Harry's teachers are looking out for his best interests. The spiteful Potions master Snape seems to have it out for Harry from day one.Harry's years at Hogwarts are never boring! Each book chronicles a different school year where Harry, Ron, and Hermione have to overcome treacherous obstacles put in place by the dastardly Voldemort or his minions. This involves everything from battling mountain trolls and deadly plants to unraveling ancient mysteries and breaking evil curses.The magic system in Harry Potter is so inventive and the wizarding world is fleshed out with such amazing detail. Thereare unique magical creatures like hippogriffs, thestrals, and blast-ended skrewts. The different witches, wizards, ghosts, house elves, and other characters are all richly developed too.My personal favorite book is Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. In this one, an infamous wizard named Sirius Black has escaped from the hellish wizard prison Azkaban. Everyone thinks he's after Harry, so terrifying Dementors are brought in to guard Hogwarts. But a bigger mystery starts to unravel – one tying into Harry's past and his parents.One thing I love about the books is how brave, loyal, and determined the main characters are. Harry is always putting himself in danger to protect those he cares about and fight against evil forces. Ron is a true friend who sticks by Harry no matter what. And Hermione is brilliant and constantly using her smarts to get them out of sticky situations.J.K. Rowling's writing draws you right into this rich magical world. You become so invested in the characters and are constantly kept on the edge of your seat turning the pages. The books have it all - magic, mystery, friendship, adventure, tragedy, and triumph against all odds.When you start reading Harry Potter, you just get completely sucked into this incredible universe. You find yourself wishingyou could join Harry, visit Diagon Alley and Hogsmeade, and experience all the wonderous magic for yourself. I must have read the entire series like a hundred times and it still hasn't gotten old!If you haven't experienced the magic of the Harry Potter books yet, you are seriously missing out. These books have sold millions and millions of copies for good reason – they are simply spellbinding. The story, characters, and world will stay with you forever. I can't recommend them enough, even to adults! Just start with the first book, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, and you'll be instantly hooked wanting to devour the whole series. After that, you'll be just as big a Potterhead as me!篇4Here's an introduction to Harry Potter in English, written in a tone suitable for elementary school students, with a length of around 2,000 words:Harry Potter: The Magical World of a Young WizardHave you ever dreamed of attending a school where you could learn to cast spells and brew magical potions? Well, that's exactly what happens to Harry Potter, the famous boy wizard created by author J.K. Rowling. Harry's story is full of excitingadventures, brave friends, and daring battles against the forces of evil!Harry Potter is just an ordinary boy living with his mean aunt, uncle, and cousin. On his 11th birthday, he discovers that he's actually a wizard and has been accepted into the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Can you imagine how surprised he must have felt?At Hogwarts, Harry learns all about the magical world he never knew existed. He attends classes like Potions, Charms, and Defense Against the Dark Arts, where he practices spells and learns about different magical creatures. Harry also gets to play the amazing wizard sport called Quidditch, where players fly on broomsticks and try to score points with special balls.But Harry's life at Hogwarts isn't all fun and games. There's a powerful dark wizard named Voldemort who wants to take over the magical world. Harry has to face Voldemort and his evil followers every year, putting his bravery and friendship to the test. With the help of his best friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, Harry always manages to save the day.One of the coolest things about the Harry Potter books is the incredible detail J.K. Rowling put into creating the magical world. From the moving paintings and talking ghosts that haunt thecorridors of Hogwarts, to the different types of magical candy and joke shops in the wizarding village of Hogsmeade, everything feels so real and exciting.Whether it's battling three-headed dogs, fighting off dementors (scary creatures that can suck out your soul!), or competing in the dangerous Triwizard Tournament, Harry always finds himself in the most thrilling situations. And that's what makes the Harry Potter series so much fun to read!Over the course of seven books, we get to follow Harry and his friends as they grow from young students into brave, powerful wizards. Along the way, they learn valuable lessons about friendship, courage, and standing up for what's right.So if you're looking for a magical adventure full of suspense, humor, and unforgettable characters, be sure to pick up the Harry Potter books. You'll never want to leave the wizarding world behind!篇5Harry Potter: The Boy Who LivedHi there! My name is Timmy and I'm going to tell you all about Harry Potter. He's the star of this super cool book series that I just can't get enough of!Harry Potter is a young wizard who lives in the Muggle world (that's what they call non-magical people) with his mean aunt and uncle, the Dursleys. On his 11th birthday, Harry finds out that he's actually a wizard and gets invited to attend Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. How awesome is that?At Hogwarts, Harry makes two best friends – Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Ron comes from a big wizarding family and is always cracking jokes. Hermione is the brainiest witch you'll ever meet and is always helping Harry and Ron out of trouble. Together, they go on the most amazing adventures!In their first year, the trio has to get past a three-headed dog, flying keys, and a life-size wizard's chess game. That's because there's someone evil trying to steal the Sorcerer's Stone, a powerful magical object hidden at Hogwarts. With a lot of courage and a bit of luck, Harry manages to stop the bad guy and save the day!In the next few years, Harry has to deal with an angry house-elf, a prisoner escaped from Azkaban (the wizard prison), and even a dragon! But the biggest baddie of all is LordVoldemort, the darkest wizard ever. He tried to kill Harry when he was just a baby, but Harry survived and got his lightning-bolt scar. Now Voldemort is back and wants to get rid of Harry for good.The books are filled with magic spells, talking paintings, ghosts, unicorns, and all sorts of crazy creatures like house-elves and three-headed dogs. My favorites are the Dementors (creepy cloaked figures that suck all the happiness out of you) and the Patronus Charm, which is a spell that creates a spirit guardian to drive them away. Harry's Patronus is a stag!At Hogwarts, the students get sorted into four houses –Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, and Slytherin. Harry, Ron, and Hermione are all in Gryffindor, which values bravery and chivalry. Each house has a cool mascot too – Gryffindor's is a lion! They compete against each other to win the House Cup by earning points for good behavior.The classes at Hogwarts are so much fun! Can you imagine learning how to turn a match into a needle or brew a potion that makes you grow fur? My favorite class would definitely be Defense Against the Dark Arts, where you learn how to fight off dark creatures and curses. That ghostly Professor Binns who teaches History of Magic doesn't sound very exciting though.When they're not in class, Harry and his friends love playing the wizard sport Quidditch. It's kind of like soccer, but on broomsticks and with four different balls flying around! Harry is the best Seeker ever and has to catch the tiny Golden Snitch to win matches for Gryffindor.The Harry Potter series has seven books in total. The last one is a real nail-biter with an epic battle between Harry and Voldemort. I won't spoil it for you, but let's just say it's the most exciting book ever! J.K. Rowling, the author, sure knows how to weave an amazing story.That's the magical world of Harry Potter in a nutshell! These books are the perfect mix of adventure, friendship, mystery, and imagination. Once you start reading, you'll be just as hooked as me. So what are you waiting for? Head to your nearest library or bookstore, and let the magic begin!篇6Harry Potter is So Cool!Have you read the Harry Potter books or seen the movies? If not, you're really missing out! Harry Potter is one of the coolest book and movie series ever made. It's about this regular kid named Harry who finds out on his 11th birthday that he'sactually a wizard and gets invited to go to a magic school called Hogwarts. How awesome is that?At Hogwarts, Harry learns all sorts of magical spells and potions. He gets his very own magic wand and everything. The classes at Hogwarts sound way more fun than regular school. There's Transfiguration where you learn to change one object into another, like turning a desk into a pig. In Charms class, you practice all kinds of cool charms and spells. Potions is kind of like science class, but for making magic potions instead of boring old experiments.My favorite class is definitely Defense Against the Dark Arts. That's where you learn to defend yourself against evil wizards and scary magical creatures like werewolves, dementors, and giants. Harry has to take that class a lot because there's this really bad dark wizard named Voldemort who is always trying to kill him or take over the wizarding world.Speaking of the wizarding world, it's such a neat place! Wizards live alongside regular humans (who they call Muggles), but in their own secret magical communities. They have their own Ministry of Magic government, sport of Quidditch (which is kind of like soccer but played flying on broomsticks), and coolshopping areas like Diagon Alley where you can buy wands, owls, spell books, and other magic supplies.Harry has two best friends who go to Hogwarts with him - Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Ron comes from a big wizarding family where everybody has red hair and loves a sport called Quidditch. Hermione is a Muggle-born witch, which means she has non-wizard parents. She's really smart and always gets the best grades. I think Hermione is my favorite character because she's not afraid to break rules when she needs to.Every year at Hogwarts, Harry seems to get involved in some kind of crazy adventure battling dark forces and Voldemort's followers. One year, they have to guard a powerful magical stone from getting stolen. Another year, a secret chamber gets opened releasing a monster that starts attacking students. In later books, Harry has to fight off dementors, compete in a dangerous tournament, and go on a quest to destroy Voldemort's soul containers.The adventures are all really exciting, but also pretty scary at times. Harry and his friends always have to be really brave and put their lives at risk. They get help from wise wizard mentors like Headmaster Dumbledore and Harry's godfather Sirius Black. Andof course, they use all the magic spells and charms they've been learning at Hogwarts.My favorite part of the Harry Potter books is learning about all the different spells and magical objects. Spells like Expecto Patronum to summon a Patronus protector against dementors. Or cool artifacts like the Invisibility Cloak that Harry inherits which makes the wearer invisible. Or how about the Marauder's Map, an enchanted map that shows every person's location inside Hogwarts? So awesome! I wish I could go to Hogwarts too and learn magic.The Harry Potter movies are really well done too. The grownup actors who play the main kid characters are perfectly cast. Daniel Radcliffe makes a great Harry - he really brings the character to life on screen. And the special effects wizarding duels and creature battles look so incredibly realistic thanks to movie magic.I've read all seven Harry Potter books multiple times, and watched the eight movie adaptations more times than I can count. I never get tired of the adventures of Harry, Ron, and Hermione! The storytelling is just top-notch with unpredictable twists, high stakes, and high emotions. Even though parts of it are make-believe fantasy, it also deals with real issues that kidscan relate to like bullying, feeling like an outcast, family problems, and finding the courage to stand up against evil.So if you haven't experienced the wizarding world of Harry Potter yet, I highly recommend you check it out! Read the books first if you can, because they go way more in-depth than the movies do. Borrow them from your school library. Then watch the movie adaptations after you've read each book. You'll get so immersed in the rich, magical world of Hogwarts that you'll wish your。
On Bullshitpreliminary questions about bullshit remain, after all, not only unanswered but unasked. So far as I am aware, very little work has been done on this subject. I have not undertaken a survey of the literature, partly because I do not know how to go about it. To be sure, there is one quite obvious place to look — the Oxford English Dictionary.The OED has an entry for bullshit in the supplementary volumes, and it also has entries for various pertinent uses of the word bull and for some related terms. I shall consider some of these entries in due course. I have not consulted dictionaries in languages other than English, because I do not know the words for bullshit or bull in any other language.Another worthwhile source is the title essay in The Prevalence of Humbug by Max Black. I am uncertain just how close in meaning the word humbug is to the word bullshit. Of course, the words are not freely and fully interchangeable; it is clear that they are used differently. But the difference appears on the whole to have more to do with considerations of gentility, and certain other rhetorical parameters, than with the strictly literal modes of significance that concern me most. It is more polite, as well as less intense, to say “Humbug!” than to say “Bullshit!” For the sake of this discussion, I shall assume that there is no other important difference between the two, Black suggests a number of synonyms for humbug, including the following: “balderdash”, “claptrap”, “hokum”, “drivel”, “buncombe”, “imposture”, and “quackery”. This list of quaint equivalents is not very helpful. But Black also confronts the problem of establishing the nature of humbug more directly, and he offers the following formal definition:A very similar formulation might plausibly be offered as enunciating the essential characteristics of bullshit. As a preliminary to developing an independent account of those characteristics, I will comment on the various elements of Black’s definition.Deceptive misrepresentation:This may sound pleonastic. No doubt what Black has in mind is that humbug is necessarily designed or intended to deceive, that its misrepresentation is not merely inadvertent. In other words, it is deliberate misrepresentation. Now if, as a matter of conceptual necessity, an intention to deceive is an invariable feature of humbug, then the property of being humbug depends at least in part upon the perpetrator’s state of mind. It cannot be identical, accordingly, with any properties —either inherent or relational — belonging just to the utterance by which the humbug is perpetrated. In this respect, the property of being humbug is similar to that of being a lie, which is identical neither with the falsity nor with any of the other properties of the statement the liar makes, but which requires that the liar makes his statement in a certain state of mind —namely, with an intention to deceive. It is a further question whether there are any features essential to humbug or to lying that are not dependent upon the intentions and beliefs of the person responsible for the humbug or the lie, or whether it is, on the contrary, possible for any utterance whatsoever to be —given that the speaker is in a certain state of mind — a vehicle of humbug or of a lie. In some accounts of lying there is no lie unless a false statement is made; in others a person may be lying even if the statement he makes istrue, as long as he himself believes that the statement is false and intends by making it to deceive. What about humbug and bullshit? May any utterance at all qualify as humbug or bullshit, given that (so to speak) the utterer’s heart is in the right place, or must the utterance have certain characteristics of its own as well?Short of lying: It must be part of the point of saying that humbug is “short of lying,”that while it has some of the distinguishing characteristics of lies, there are others that it lacks. But this cannot be the whole point. After all, every use of language without exception has some, but not all, of the characteristic features of lies — if no other, then at least the feature simply of being a use of language. Yet it would surely be incorrect to describe every use of language as short of lying. Black’s phrase evokes the notion of some sort of continuum, on which lying occupies a certain segment while humbug is located exclusively at earlier points. What continuum could this be, along which one encounters humbug only before one encounters lying? Both lying and humbug are modes of misrepresentation. It is not at first glance apparent, however, just how the difference between these varieties of misrepresentation might be construed as a difference in degree.Especially by pretentious word or deed:There are two points to notice here. First, Black identifies humbug not only as a category of speech but as a category of action as well; it may be accomplished either by words or by deeds. Second, his use of the qualifier “especially”indicates that Black does not regard pretentiousness as an essential or wholly indispensable characteristic of humbug. Undoubtedly, much humbug is pretentious. So far as concerns bullshit, moreover, “pretentious bullshit” is close to being a stock phrase. But I am inclined to think thatwhen bullshit is pretentious, this happens because pretentiousness is its motive rather than a constitutive element of its essence. The fact that a person is behaving pretentiously is not, it seems to me, part of what is required to make his utterance an instance of bullshit. It is often, to be sure, what accounts for his making that utterance. However, it must not be assumed that bullshit always and necessarily has pretentiousness as its motive.Misrepresentation …of somebody’s own thoughts, feelings, or attitudes:This provision that the perpetrator of humbug is essentially misrepresenting himself raises some very central issues. To begin with, whenever a person deliberately misrepresents anything, he must inevitably misrepresenting his own state of mind. It is possible, of course, for a person to misrepresent that alone — for instance, by pretending to have a desire or a feeling which he does not actually have. But suppose that a person, whether by telling a lie or in another way, misrepresents something else. Then he necessarily misrepresents at least two things. He misrepresents whatever he is talking about — i.e., the state of affairs that is the topic or referent of his discourse —and in doing this he cannot avoid misrepresenting his own mind as well. Thus, someone who lies about how much money he has in his pocket both gives an account of the amount of money in his pocket and conveys that he believes this account. If the lie works, then its victim is twice deceived, having one false belief about what is in the liar’s pocket and another false belief about what is in the liar’s mind. Now it is unlikely that Black wishes that the referent of humbug is in every instance the state of the speaker’s mind. There is no particular reason, after all, why humbug may not be about other things. Black probably means that humbug is not designed primarily to give its audience a false belief aboutwhatever state of affairs may be the topic, but that its primary intention is rather to give its audience a false impression concerning what is going on in the mind of the speaker. Insofar as it is humbug, the creation of this impression is its main purpose and its point. Understanding Black along these lines suggests a hypothesis to account for his characterization of humbug as “short of lying.” If I lie to you about how much money I have, then I do not thereby make an explicit assertion concerning my beliefs. Therefore, one might with some plausibility maintain that although in telling the lie I certainly misrepresent what is in my mind, this misrepresentation —as distinct from my misrepresentation of what is in my pocket —is not strictly speaking a lie at all. For I do not come right out with any statement whatever about what is in my mind. Nor does the statement I do affirm —e.g., “I have twenty dollars in my pocket” —imply any statement that attributes a belief to me. On the other hand, it is unquestionable that in so affirming, I provide you with a reasonable basis for making certain judgments about what I believe. In particular, I provide you with a reasonable basis for supposing that I believe there is twenty dollars in my pocket. Since this supposition is by hypothesis false, I do in telling the lie tend to deceive you concerning what is in my mind even though I do not actually tell a lie about that. In this light, it does not seem unnatural or inappropriate to regard me as misrepresenting my own beliefs in a way that is “short of lying.” It is easy to think of familiar situations by which Black’s account of humbug appears to be unproblematically confirmed. Consider a Fourth of July orator, who goes on bombastically about “our great and blessed country, whose Founding-Fathers under divine guidance created a new beginning for mankind.” This is surely humbug. As Black’s account suggests, theorator is not lying. He would be lying only if it were his intention to bring about in his audience beliefs which he himself regards as false, concerning such matters as whether our country is great, whether it is blessed, whether the Founders had divine guidance, and whether what they did was in fact to create a new beginning for mankind. But the orator does not really care what his audience thinks about the Founding Fathers, or about the role of the deity in our country’s history, or the like. At least, it is not an interest in what anyone thinks about these matters that motivates his speech. It is clear that what makes Fourth of July oration humbug is not fundamentally that the speaker regards his statements as false. Rather, just as Black’s account suggests, the orator intends these statements to convey a certain impression of himself. He is not trying to deceive anyone concerning American history. What he cares about is what people think of him.He wants them to think of him as a patriot, as someone who has deep thoughts and feelings about the origins and the mission of our country, who appreciates the importance of religion, who is sensitive to the greatness of our history, whose pride in that history is combined with humility before God, and so on. Black’s account of humbug appears, then, to fit certain paradigms quite snugly. Nonetheless, I do not believe that it adequately or accurately grasps the essential character of bullshit. It is correct to say of bullshit, as he says of humbug, both that it is short of lying and that chose who perpetrate it misrepresent themselves in a certain way. But Black’s account of these two features is significantly off the mark. I shall next attempt to develop, by considering some biographical material pertaining to Ludwig Wittgenstein, a preliminary but more accurately focused appreciation of just what the centralcharacteristics of bullshit are. Wittgenstein once said that the following bit of verse by Longfellow could serve him as a motto:In the elder days of artBuilders wrought with greatest careEach minute and unseen part,For the Gods are everywhere.The point of these lines is clear. In the old days, craftsmen did not cut corners. They worked carefully, and they took care with every aspect of their work. Every part of the product was considered, and each was designed and made to be exactly as it should be. These craftsmen did not relax their thoughtful self-discipline even with respect to features of their work which would ordinarily not be visible. Although no one would notice if those features were not quite right, the craftsmen would be bothered by their consciences. So nothing was swept under the rug. Or, one might perhaps also say, there was no bullshit.It does seem fitting to construe carelessly made, shoddy goods as in some way analogues of bullshit. But in what way? Is the resemblance that bullshit itself is invariably produced in a careless or self-indulgent manner, that it is never finely crafted, that in the making of it there is never the meticulously attentive concern with detail to which Longfellow alludes? Is the bullshitter by his very nature a mindless slob? Is his product necessarily messy or unrefined? The word shit does, to be sure, suggest this. Excrement is not designed or crafted at all; it is merely emitted, or dumped. It may have a more or less coherent shape, or it may not, but it is in any case certainly not wrought.The notion of carefully wrought bullshit involves, then, a certain inner strain. Thoughtful attention to detail requires discipline and objectivity. It entails accepting standards and limitations that forbid the indulgence of impulse or whim. It is this selflessness that, in connection with bullshit, strikes us as inapposite. But in fact it is not out of the question at all. The realms of advertising and of public relations, and the nowadays closely related realm of politics, are replete with instances of bullshit so unmitigated that they can serve among the most indisputable and classic paradigms of the concept. And in these realms there are exquisitely sophisticated craftsmen who —with the help of advanced and demanding techniques of market research, of public opinion polling, of psychological testing, and so forth —dedicate themselves tirelessly to getting every word and image they produce exactly right.Yet there is something more to be said about this. However studiously and conscientiously the bullshitter proceeds, it remains true that he is also trying to get away with something. There is surely in his work, as in the work of the slovenly craftsman, some kind of laxity which resists or eludes the demands of a disinterested and austere discipline. The pertinent mode of laxity cannot be equated, evidently, with simple carelessness or inattention to detail. I shall attempt in due course to locate it more correctly. Wittgenstein devoted his philosophical energies largely to identifying and combating what he regarded as insidiously disruptive forms of “non-sense.”He was apparently like that in his personal life as well. This comes out in an anecdote related by Fania Pascal, who knew him in Cambridge in the 1930s:Now who knows what really happened? It seems extraordinary, almost unbelievable, that anyone could object seriously to what Pascal reports herself as having said. That characterization of her feelings — so innocently close to the utterly commonplace “sick as a dog” — is simply not provocative enough to arouse any response as lively or intense as disgust. If Pascal’s simile is offensive, then what figurative or allusive uses of language would not be? So perhaps it did not really happen quite as Pascal says. Perhaps Wittgenstein was trying to make a small joke, and it misfired. He was only pretending to bawl Pascal out, just for the fun of a little hyperbole; and she got the tone and the intention wrong. She thought he was disgusted by her remark, when in fact he was only trying to cheer her up with some playfully exaggerated mock criticism or joshing. In that case the incident is not incredible or bizarre after all.But if Pascal failed to recognize that Wittgenstein was only teasing, then perhaps the possibility that he was serious was at least not so far out of the question. She knew him, and she knew what to expect from him; she knew how he made her feel. Her way of understanding or of misunderstanding his remark was very likely not altogether discordant, then, with her sense of what he was like. We may fairly suppose that even if her account of the incident is not strictly true to the facts of Wittgenstein’s intention, it is sufficiently true to her idea of Wittgenstein to have made sense toher. For the purposes of this discussion, I shall accept Pascal’s report at face value, supposing that when it came to the use of allusive or figurative language, Wittgenstein was indeed as preposterous as she makes him out to be.Then just what is it that the Wittgenstein in her report considers to be objectionable? Let us assume that he is correct about the facts: that is, Pascal really does not know how run-over dogs feel. Even so, when she says what she does, she is plainly not lying.She would have been lying if, when she made her statement, she was aware that she actually felt quite good. For however little she knows about the lives of dogs, it must certainly be clear to Pascal that when dogs are run over they do not feel good. So if she herself had in fact been feeling good, it would have been a lie to assert that she felt like a run-over dog. Pascal’s Wittgenstein does not intend to accuse her of lying, but of misrepresentation of another sort. She characterizes her feeling as “the feeling of a run-over dog.” She is not really acquainted, however, with the feeling to which this phrase refers. Of course, the phrase is far from being complete nonsense to her; she is hardly speaking gibberish. What she says has an intelligible connotation, which she certainly understands. Moreover, she does know something about the quality of the feeling to which the phrase refers: she knows at least that it is an undesirable and unenjoyable feeling, a bad feeling. The trouble with her statement is that it purports to convey something more than simply that she feels bad. Her characterization of her feeling is too specific; it is excessively particular. Hers is not just any bad feeling but, according to her account, the distinctive kind of bad feeling that a dog has when it is run over. To the Wittgenstein in Pascal’s story, judging from his response, this is just bullshit.Now assuming that Wittgenstein does indeed regard Pascal’s characterization of how she feels as an instance of bullshit, why does it strike him that way? It does so, I believe, because he perceives what Pascal says as being —roughly speaking, for now —unconnected to a concern with the truth. Her statement is not germane to the enterprise of describing reality. She does not even think she knows, except in the vaguest way, how a run-over dog feels. Her description of her own feeling is, accordingly, something that she is merely making up. She concocts it out of whole cloth; or, if she got it from someone else, she is repeating it quite mindlessly and without any regard for how things really are.It is for this mindlessness that Pascal’s Wittgenstein chides her. What disgusts him is that Pascal is not even concerned whether her statement is correct. There is every likelihood, of course, that she says what she does only in a somewhat clumsy effort to speak colorfully, or to appear vivacious or good-humored; and no doubt Wittgenstein’s reaction — as she construes it — is absurdly intolerant. Be this as it may, it seems clear what that reaction is. He reacts as though he perceives her to be speaking about her feeling thoughtlessly, without conscientious attention to the relevant facts. Her statement is not “wrought with greatest care.”She makes it without bothering to take into account at all the question of its accuracy. The point that troubles Wittgenstein is manifestly not that Pascal has made a mistake in her description of how she feels. Nor is it even that she has made a careless mistake. Her laxity, or her lack of care, is not a matter of having permitted an error to slip into her speech on account of some inadvertent or momentarily negligent lapse in the attention she was devoting to getting things right. The point is rather that, so far as Wittgenstein can see, Pascal offers a description of acertain state of affairs without genuinely submitting to the constraints which the endeavor to provide an accurate representation of reality imposes. Her fault is not that she fails to get things right, but that she is not even trying.This is important to Wittgenstein because, whether justifiably or not, he takes what she says seriously, as a statement purporting to give an informative description of the way she feels. He construes her as engaged in an activity to which the distinction between what is true and what is false is crucial, and yet as taking no interest in whether what she says is true or false. It is in this sense that Pascal’s statement is unconnected to a concern with truth: she is not concerned with the truth-value of what she says. That is why she cannot be regarded as lying; for she does not presume that she knows the truth, and therefore she cannot be deliberately promulgating a proposition that she presumes to be false: Her statement is grounded neither in a belief that it is true nor, as a lie must be, in a belief that it is not true. It is just this lack of connection to a concern with truth —this indifference to how things really are — that I regard as of the essence of bullshit.Now I shall consider (quite selectively) certain items in the Oxford English Dictionary that are pertinent to clarifying the nature of bullshit. The OED defines a bull session as “an informal conversation or discussion, esp. of a group of males.”Now as a definition, this seems wrong. For one thing, the dictionary evidently supposes that the use of the term bull in bull session serves primarily just to indicate gender. But even if it were true that the participants in bull sessions are generally or typically males, the assertion that a bull session is essentially nothing more particular than an informal discussion among males would be as far off the mark as the parallelassertion that a hen session is simply an informal conversation among females. It is probably true that the participants in hen sessions must be females. Nonetheless the term hen session conveys something more specific than this concerning the particular kind of informal conversation among females to which hen sessions are characteristically devoted. What is distinctive about the sort of informal discussion among males that constitutes a bull session is, it seems to me, something like this: while the discussion may be intense and significant, it is in a certain respect not “for real.”The characteristic topics of a bull session have to do with very personal and emotion-laden aspects of life —for instance, religion, politics, or sex. People are generally reluctant to speak altogether openly about these topics if they expect that they might be taken too seriously. What tends to go on in a bull session is that the participants try out various thoughts and attitudes in order to see how it feels to hear themselves saying such things and in order to discover how others respond, without it being assumed that they are committed to what they say: It is understood by everyone in a bull session that the statements people make do not necessarily reveal what they really believe or how they really feel. The main point is to make possible a high level of candor and an experimental or adventuresome approach to the subjects under discussion. Therefore provision is made for enjoying a certain irresponsibility, so that people will be encouraged to convey what is on their minds without too much anxiety that they will be held to it.Each of the contributors to a bull session relies, in other words, upon a general recognition that what he expresses or says is not to be understood as being what he means wholeheartedly or believes unequivocally to be true. The purpose of theconversation is not to communicate beliefs. Accordingly, the usual assumptions about the connection between what people say and what they believe are suspended. The statements made in a bull session differ from bullshit in that there is no pretense that this connection is being sustained. They are like bullshit by virtue of the fact that they are in some degree unconstrained by a concern with truth. This resemblance between bull sessions and bullshit is suggested also by the term shooting the bull,which refers to the sort of conversation that characterizes bull sessions and in which the term shooting is very likely a cleaned-up rendition of shitting. The very term bull session is, indeed, quite probably a sanitized version of bullshit session. A similar theme is discernible in a British usage of bull in which, according to the OED,the term refers to “unnecessary routine tasks or ceremonial; excessive discipline or ‘spit-and-polish’; = red-tape.”The dictionary provides the following examples of this usage:“The Squadron … felt very bolshieabout all that bull that was flyingaround the station” (I. Gleed, Arise toConquer vi. 51, I942); “Them turningout the guard for us, us marching pasteyes right, all that sort of bull” (A.Baron, Human Kind xxiv. 178, 1953);the drudgery and ‘bull’ in an MP’slife.”(Economist 8 Feb. 470/471, 1958)Here the term bull evidently pertains to tasks that are pointless in that they have nothing much to do with the primary intent or justifying purpose of the enterprise which requires them. Spit-and-polish andred tape do not genuinely contribute, it is presumed, to the “real”purposes of military personnel or government officials, even though they are imposed by agencies or agents that purport to be conscientiously devoted to the pursuit of those purposes. Thus the “unnecessary routine tasks or ceremonial”that constitute bull are disconnected from the legitimating motives of the activity upon which they intrude, just as the things people say in bull sessions are disconnected from their settled beliefs, and as bullshit is disconnected from a concern with the truth.The term bull is also employed, in a rather more widespread and familiar usage, as a somewhat less coarse equivalent of bullshit. In an entry for bull as so used, the OED suggests the following as definitive: “trivial, insincere, or untruthful talk or writing; nonsense.”Now it does not seem distinctive of bull either that it must be deficient in meaning or that it is necessarily unimportant; so “nonsense”and “trivial,”even apart from their vagueness, seem to be on the wrong track. The focus of “insincere, or untruthful”is better, but it needs to be sharpened. The entry at hand also provides the following two definitions:1914 Dialect Notes IV. 162 Bull, talkwhich is not to the purpose; “hot air.”I 932 Times Lit. Supp. 8 Dec. 933/3“Bull” is the slang term for acombination of bluff, bravado, “hotair” and what we used to call in theArmy “Kidding the troops”“Not to the purpose” is appropriate, but it is bothtoo broad in scope and too vague. It covers digressions and innocent irrelevancies, which are not invariably instances of bull; furthermore, saying that bull is not to the purpose leaves it uncertain what purpose is meant. The reference in both definitions to “hot air” is more helpful. When we characterize talk as hot air, we mean that what comes out of the speaker’s mouth is only that. It is mere vapor. His speech is empty, without substance or content. His use of language, accordingly, does not contribute to the purpose it purports to serve. No more information is communicated than if the speaker had merely exhaled. There are similarities between hot air and excrement, incidentally, which make hot air seem an especially suitable equivalent for bullshit.Just as hot air is speech that has been emptied of all informative content, so excrement is matter from which everything nutritive has been removed. Excrement may be regarded as the corpse of nourishment, what remains when the vital elements in food have been exhausted. In this respect, excrement is a representation of death which we ourselves produce and which, indeed, we cannot help producing in the very process of maintaining our lives. Perhaps it is for making death so intimate that we find excrement so repulsive. In any event, it cannot serve the purposes of sustenance, any more than hot air can serve those of cummunication. Now consider these lines from Pound’s Canto LXXIV, which the OED cites in its entry on bullshit as a verb:Hey Snag wots in the bibl’?Wot are the books ov the bible?Name ’em, don’t bullshit ME.This is a call for the facts. The person addressed is。