《到灯塔去》论文弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫

《到灯塔去》中的空间叙事研究《到灯塔去》是英国作家弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的一部小说，以其独特的空间叙事而闻名。

本文将从空间叙事的角度分析《到灯塔去》中的叙事特点和意义。

小说《到灯塔去》的空间叙事包括两个主要方面：物理空间和心理空间。

物理空间是指小说中描述的具体地点和环境，如拉姆斯家族的度假别墅、灯塔及周围的海滩等；心理空间则是指人物内心的情感、思想和回忆。

物理空间在《到灯塔去》中起到了承载情节、塑造人物和传递主题的作用。

拉姆斯家族的度假别墅被描绘得十分细致，从大厅到花园，从楼梯到卧室，每一个细节都被描写得栩栩如生。

这些物理空间不仅为人物提供了行动的场所，还反映了他们的性格和关系。

比如，拉姆斯夫人精心打理的花园展示了她的细致和爱心，而度假别墅的庞大空间则映射出拉姆斯家族的社会地位和经济状况。

此外，灯塔作为小说的核心象征，具有神秘和超越性的意义，它是人物向往和追寻的目标，也是连接人物之间情感纽带的象征。

心理空间在《到灯塔去》中同样重要。

小说以拉姆斯家族的成员为中心，通过展示他们的内心世界，揭示了人性的复杂性和变化。

人物内心的情感和思想通过对话、回忆和内心独白等手法展现出来。

例如，拉姆斯夫人对于度假别墅的热爱和渴望，以及她对婚姻和母性角色的思考，都通过对她内心的描写得到了体现。

同时，心理空间也是小说中的重要叙事手法之一。

伍尔夫运用内心独白的方式，将人物的思绪和情感直接呈现给读者，增强了读者对人物内心世界的了解和共鸣。

通过物理空间和心理空间的双重叙事，伍尔夫在《到灯塔去》中创造了一个复杂而丰富的叙事世界。

这种空间叙事不仅为读者提供了一个立体的阅读体验，还让人们深入思考人与环境、人与人之间的关系。

物理空间的细腻描绘和心理空间的深入剖析，使得小说中的人物和事件更加真实可信，读者也更容易与之产生共鸣和情感交流。

《到灯塔去》中的空间叙事是该小说的一大特色。

通过对物理空间和心理空间的精心描绘和运用，伍尔夫成功地打造了一个情感丰富、思想深刻的叙事世界，使读者得以深入人物内心，感受到人性的复杂性和变化。

论《到灯塔去》的象征艺术论文伍尔芙在《到灯塔去》中大量使用了象征艺术,塑造了众多的象征物象。

这些物象,各有独特的象征意义: 大海象征桀骜不驯、凶险残暴的大自然, 灯塔象征光明、真理和希望, 窗口象征认知自我和世界的心灵之窗, 镜子、画布和颜色等也各有象征意义。

象征艺术的成功使用,极大地丰富了小说的内涵。

以下是店铺为大家精心准备的：论《到灯塔去》的象征艺术相关论文。

内容仅供参考，欢迎阅读!论《到灯塔去》的象征艺术全文如下：摘要：《到灯塔去》是英国著名现代小说家弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫创作的一部充满象征色彩的意识流小说，大量独特新颖、充满神秘特质的象征意象的运用极大地丰富了小说的内涵。

可以说象征在这部小说中无处不在，只有准确理解作品中各种象征意象的内涵意义，才能准确把握人物性格、破解小说主旨。

关键词：弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫《到灯塔去》象征意象在艺术创作过程中，艺术家常借助于一些能引起人们普遍情感和联想的或创造出来的具有特定含义的具体事物的外在特征来表达某种具有特殊意义的事理或艺术家深邃的思想的手法，这种艺术手法就是象征，象征是文学创作的基本手法之一。

《到灯塔去》是英国著名的现代小说家弗吉尼亚?伍尔夫创作的一部充满象征色彩的意识流小说，作品故事情节较为简单，主要讲述了一个知识分子家庭如何成就灯塔之行的经过，再现了十年间发生的故事，而这十年被压缩成一个黑夜和两个白天。

与伍尔夫之前的意识流作品相比，《到灯塔去》运用的象征意象极为丰富，可以说象征在这部小说中无处不在，只有准确理解作品中各种象征意象的内涵意义，才能准确把握人物性格、破解小说主旨。

一弗吉尼亚?伍尔夫与象征主义弗吉尼亚?伍尔夫是20世纪英国文学史上最杰出的女作家，也是西方意识流小说的杰出代表，她以卓越的才华、大胆的创新精神成为英国现代文学史上一位不可忽视的重要人物。

19世纪末、20世纪初是一个风云变化、动荡不安的时代，政治、经济、科技等产生了巨大变化，尤其是世界大战的爆发、科学技术的快速发展以及传统宗教伦理观念的动摇等引发了意识形态领域里的危机。

摘要:《到灯塔去》诞生于伍尔夫思想和艺术的成熟期,显现出鲜明的现代主义创作观和多重的叙事策略。

该部作品主要以“到灯塔去”为主脉络,将故事情节加以引申发展,详细讲述了第一次世界大战之前到结束后,拉姆齐一家的生活经历。

为了进一步了解该部作品的叙事风格,本文首先分析了其创作特点,随后从双重声音、空白处理、突出瞬间三个维度,深入探究了《到灯塔去》的叙事艺术。

以期能够彰显《到灯塔去》的新颖结构与高超的写作水平,体现作者现代主观的创作理念,让广大读者能够在阅读过程中得到更大的想象空间,更好的理解作品内涵。

关键词:伍尔芙;《到灯塔去》;象征手法;叙事中图分类号:I561.074文献标识码:A文章编号:1009-8534(2019)05-0059-03作者简介:袁佳(1984-),女,长春理工大学光电信息学院讲师。

弗吉尼亚·伍尔芙是英国意识流小说的代表作家,也是一位具有多重身份的传奇女性,她创作的意识流小说受到业内人士的高度关注与评价。

《到灯塔去》诞生于伍尔芙思想及艺术成熟时期,这部被她丈夫称为“全新心理分析诗”的作品于1927年正式完成并出版,这是伍尔芙创作速度最快、最自由、最淋漓酣畅的一部作品,也是她意识流代表作。

《到灯塔去》具有显著的现代主义创作观念和独特的叙事艺术风格,作者在交织叙事中通过语言交错的间接方式来实现频繁转换,突出人物意识,进一步加深了广大读者对人物内心活动与真实感情的体会和理解。

一、弗吉尼亚·伍尔芙《到灯塔去》的创作特点(一)象征手法《到灯塔去》最显著的创作特点是象征手法的大量使用,这种手法有利于读者在粗略阅读的情况下,结合题目大致了解故事内容。

该部作品名称中的“灯塔”二字实际上是一种象征手法的表现,因为灯塔原本是指为漂浮在海上的船只指明方向的“领路人”,因此,灯塔代表的是海上人的一个目标与方向,它将全部的光明无私给奉献给靠近的船只,但自己却始终孤单的站立在海中。

由此能够看出,灯塔不仅仅代表着光明、梦想、目标与追求,同时也象征着孤单和博爱。

弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫《到灯塔去》丨以笨拙理解这岁月流逝的永恒每一次翻开，就是一次走入欧洲古典艺术的体验，把有限的时间无限地延伸，但也不能徘徊太久。

浅薄的我并没有足够的认知去迅速消化伍尔夫的精神世界，于是断断续续地，长达两个月，方才与之完成一场到灯塔之旅。

如何在消逝的自我世界里挽救流动的意识。

伍尔夫文字感性的思辨，使得故事人物忘记了行动的本意，若是试图要拼凑这简单的情节，显然会显得很笨拙，也是对这本书最大的误解。

我自认为对阅读是得心应手的，在此书之前曾领略过她的文字，也对风靡一时的bloomsburry group有过了解，但也仍在阅读过程中，陷入这笨拙的牢笼。

我想把伍尔夫这本书所呈现的比喻为古典音乐——隽永而悠长。

看似散落的描述，其实只是一个错觉，如果转念一想，将三部分分别对应一首歌的结构，脉络也自然变得清晰了，而我所说的脉络是意识的表达。

村上春树的书籍摘抄窗伍尔夫的女权意识从不强烈，她的自我探索向来温柔，反而是很多的评论对她有着一些苛刻。

这犹如一扇窗，我们通过窗户去观察事物，往往也只能看见视线之内的存在，而窗里面，事物的内在，或是与其他事物的关系，不见得被看见。

拉姆齐夫人将这样的偏差具象化，在被打乱秩序的世界，她虽然每天只围绕家庭转，但有着税利的眼睛以及超乎一般人的智慧，洞悉着人与人相处的方式。

在争吵，分歧，意见不合，各种偏见交织在人生的每一丝纤维之中，原本需要读者去展开思考才能有的收获，伍尔夫通过对拉姆齐夫人人格的探索，毫无保留地流露在字里行间。

大概一年前，我曾看过以伦勃朗为主的欧洲画展，面对那些真实到如摄影的画作，除了感叹画家们奇迹般的手之外，亦尝试过对他们背后故事的想象。

在伍尔夫的书写中，重新唤起了这样的兴趣，在本书叙中，译者认为伍尔夫就是后印象派的绘画，有着强烈的个性表现眼中的世界，她追求的不是拍照式的行动，而是独特的意境和艺术效果。

啊！就是这样的，我们可以很自然地在她的描写中获得流动的艺术享受，一种不需要长篇论述的私人化体检。

论《到灯塔去》的叙述视角(一)摘要：《到灯塔去》(TotheLighthouse)是传统的现实主义小说向现代主义小说转型的代表作品之一。

在小说中，作者伍尔夫极大地降低全知全能型叙述者的叙述比例，大量采用有限视角，从人物的主观角度进行叙述，并将叙述视角频繁转换，多视角叙述，从而凸现她所倡导的文学创作理念——主观真实。

关键词：小说《到灯塔去》叙述视角有限视角视角转换弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(VirginiaWoolf，1882-1941)是现代主义小说的先锋代表，她在理论和实践两方面为现代主义小说的发展做出了杰出的贡献。

伍尔夫倡导主观真实论，在小说创作中，她摒弃了19世纪现实主义小说的常规，不再着重摹写外部世界的现实，而转向对人的主观精神世界的探索。

《到灯塔去》(TotheLighthouse)发表于1927年，是伍尔夫继《雅各的房间》和《达洛卫夫人》之后推出的又一部现代主义小说。

伍尔夫以新颖的创作理念与独特的艺术手法，将作品的内容与形式较为完美地统一起来，小说整体上是由一系列感觉、印象、思绪、回忆等心理活动构成，情节已经被淡化到无足轻重的地步。

小说较为完美地体现了伍尔夫的小说理论及写作技巧，是研究伍尔夫小说艺术的一个较好的切入点。

本文试从叙述视角方面来分析探讨小说的艺术特色。

一、有限视角(LimitedPointofView)叙述视角，简单地说，是指由谁来叙述故事以及如何叙述故事。

传统小说中，往往采用全知视角，叙述者是全知全能的“上帝”，可谓无所不知，无所不见。

这种叙述者的采用，降低了作品的真实度，让小说常带有主观说教和人为创作的痕迹。

作为现代主义小说的先锋代表，伍尔夫采用了新的叙述视角，使其作品能够更自由、更微妙地展现人物丰富而细腻的精神生活。

弗里德曼(Friedman)在《小说中的视角》将《到灯塔去》的叙述视角划分为“多重选择性的全知”(Multi-pleSelectiveOmniscience)类型。

Final paperAn Analysis of Virginia Woolf’s Thoughts of Gender and Gender Differences in To the LighthouseRequirements:Content: You may write a term paper on the following novels:1.The Catcher in the Rye2.To the LighthouseEvaluation:Abstract:Virginia Woolf(1882-1941) is a renowned English writer best known for her novels and essays. To the Lighthouse is one of her great works. This paper is mainly study three issues: feminism, the understanding of gender and the thoughts of gender differences.摘要：弗吉尼亚. 伍尔夫（1882-1941）是一位以小说和散文而著名的英国作家。

《到灯塔去》是她的佳作之一。

本篇论文主要研究的三个问题是：女性主义，对于性别的理解以及有关性别差异的思考。

OutlineTitle: An Analysis of Virginia Woolf’s Thoughts of Gender and Gender Differences in To the LighthouseⅠ.IntroductionⅡ. Body:A.Woolf and feminismB.Woolf’s androgynous visionC.Gender differences1.Definition of gender difference2.Woolf’s thoughts of gender differencesⅢ. ConclusionⅠ. Introduction:Virginia Woolf was born Adeline Virginia Stephen on 25 January, 1882 inLondon. She was an English novelist and essayist, regarded as one of the foremost modernist literary figures of the twentieth century. Her most famous works include the novels Mrs. Dalloway(1925), To the Lighthouse(1927) and Orlando(1928) and the book-length essay A Room of One’s Own(1929) with its famous dictum, “ A woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction”Wang wenyan, a postgraduate of Hunan University in the paper Female Consciousness in To the Lighthouse analyzes two major female characters, Mrs. Ramsay and Lily Briscoe from the feminist criticism point of view. At first, she studies the growth of Virginia Woolf’s feminism and analyzes “Angel in the House”and “the undercurrent in Mrs. Ramsay”. This paper is very good at focusing on one topic that is Virginia Woolf’s feminism. It offers me some knowledge about feminism and makes me more familiar with this book.Cheng ying, a posts graduate from Zhengzhou University in her paper Virginia Woolf’s Art of Fiction in To the Lighthouse studies her typical stream-of-consciousness technique, musical methods, cinematic methods and poetic methods. And she mainly analyzes how these techniques used in the novel. Through reading this paper it is helpful for us to have a hint of Wool’f’s writing skills.Li songyue, a scholar of Zhengzhou University in his paper 《<到灯塔去>两性形象的象征意义阐述》he mainly studies the narrative strategy----symbolism and gender perspective. Through the comparison of different genders’ personality, action, thinking symbolic colors and finally comes out the conclusion that in the book To the Lighthouse some objects are the symbols of genders.But in this paper, what I want to study is gender and gender differences in the novel To the Lighthouse. I will talk about feminism, androgynous thoughts and genderdifferences in the novel.Ⅱ. Virginia Woolf’s Thoughts of Gender and Gender Differences in To the LighthouseA. Woolf and feminismFeminism is an intellectual, philosophical and political discourse aimed at equalrights and legal protection for women. It involves various movements, theories and philosophies, all concerned with issues of gender difference that advocate equality for women and that campaign for women’s rights and interests.Virginia Woolf’s feminist thoughts widely cover the fields of society, politics, ethics, aesthetics, etc. and the need for freedom for the female is the primary theme in her ethical scheme. Gender and politics, morality and psychological desire are mixed together inextricably in her presentation of human motivation. In spite of all of these, Virginia Woolf has never, even once in her life, admitted that she herself is an advocator for feminism and insists that what she did was just studying it. Here we can see the complexity of Woolf’s feminist position and the flexibility with which she may be read as a feminist.In To the Lighthouse, Mrs. Ramsay and Lily Briscoe are the two female figures that Woolf mainly describes. However, they impress the readers strikingly for their views about the way to realize their own dreams and to escape from nothingness. Through the reading of Woolf’s different descriptions of Mrs. Ramsay and Lily Briscoe, we may find Woolf’s thoughts of female in the novel.Mrs. Ramsay is a competent and intelligent housewife. She supports her husband by running the house smoothly and endures domestic anxiety alone so that the daily chores won’t interrupt Mr. Ramsay’s serious thoughts on reason and logic. She miraculously manages to run the house without disturbing her husband. The financial condition of the family is exposed by one of the guests, Mr. Bankes’ perception of the family. “The Ramsays were not rich, and it was a wonder how they managed to contrive it all. Eight children! To feed eight children on philosophy!” In fact, the wonder maker is Mrs. Ramsay. With herwisdom in housework she successfully shoulders the responsibility of house management without any help from her husband. Though she is worried about the household, she tries her best not to disturb him. The refrain of the bill for the greenhouse roof looms but she decides not to tell him. “She had it on the tip of her tongue to say, as they strolled, ‘It’ll cost fifty pounds,’ but instead, for her heart failed her about money, she talk ed about Jasper shooting birds …” Mrs. Ramsay feels it her obligation to keep the husband away from the worries of small daily family life.Being a good mother is another criterion of the ideal Victorian womanhood. Woolf depicts such a good mother in this novel. Mrs. Ramsay protects her children from disillusion. When her son, James hopes for a trip to the lighthouse the next day and the father declares bad weather, it is Mrs. Ramsay who insists upon the possibility of a clear day. In this way she protects the sensitive mind of the child, retaining hope and faith in him, which shows her reverence for the spirit in others. What’s more, Mrs. Ramsay also protects her children from the chaotic adult world. By intuition, she knows the world is full of misery and sufferings.Apart from Mrs. Ramsay, Lily is the other important female figure in To the Lighthouse. She admires and loves Mrs. Ramsay and shares a lot with her. However, their differences exceed their similarity. Compared with Mrs. Ramsay who is presented as an ideal woman of Victorian period, Lily represents the woman image of the new generation. She holds her unique views on marriage, which collides with the established and long standing Victorian customs of marriage. She develops her individual relationships with the opposite sex, which challenges the unitary relationship of marriage between the two sexes. She ventures into the career of painting, which has been the preserved domain of men. She courageously fights against any difficulties and obstacles that come in her way to self independence and self realization.B. Woolf’s androgynous visionAndrogyny is a term derived from two Greek words which can refer to either of two related concepts about gender: the mixing of masculine and feminine characteristics, as in fashion statements; or the balance of “anima and animus” in psychoanalytic theory. For Woolf, the psyche is composed of two parts, one male and the other female, and only when the two are fused into one will the mind be able to produce art.In Woo lf’s opinion, there exist two genders in human cerebrum –male and female and each pair forms a complementary whale. There is no apparent hierarchical order between them: the only dominance is the feminine part in the woman’s brain, and vice versa for man. Woolf’s choice of the word “fatal” is particularly important for an understanding of the high premium she places on androgyny. An importantaspect of Woolf’s argument for androgyny insists that writers should shun consciousness of their own sex when they write because pressures to conform to social gender roles create barriers that are “fatal” to creativity. She thinks that androgynous writing is not only an ideal, but also a reality. As for Woolf, “Perhaps a mind that is purely masculine cannot create, any more than a mind that is purely feminine”. She thinks that Shakespeare’s mind is a type of the androgynous of the man-womanly mind.C. Gender differences1. Definition of gender differenceThe term “gender difference” refers to a distinction of biologic al and/or physiological characteristics typically associated with either males or females of a species in general. In the study of humans, socio-political issues arise in classifying whether a sex difference results from the biology of gender. Some feminists see gender differences as caused by patriachy or discrimination, although Difference Feminism argues for an acceptance of gender differences. Conservative masculists tend to see gender differences as inherent in human nature, while liberal masculists see gender differences as caused by matriarchy or discrimination.2. Woolf’s thoughts of gender differencesWoolf’s thoughts of gender differences are formed through her understanding of the social prejudice towards all fields that related to women.There is no doubt that Woolf not only realizes the existence of gender differences and she also advocates protecting the existence. The gender differences are caused by two major aspects: the subjective social ideology that treats men and women differently and considers different genders should have different roles; and the objective existence of psychological and physical differences between different genders. These two aspects are respectively subjective cause and objective cause. In conclusion, the essence of Woolf’s thoughts of gender differences is: 1) admission of the existence of gender differences, in both subjective and objective aspects; 2) opposition to the subjective and prejudiced thoughts of genderdifferences; and 3) promotion of the objective gender differences and encouragement of the existence of such differences.In To the Lighthouse, Woolf presents clear portraits of male and femalecharacters. The characters she describes most carefully are Mr. Ramsay and Mrs. Ramsay. In the novel, the both Mr. Ramsay and Mrs. Ramsay want to create a harmonious atmosphere among people and try to be understandable to others. However, they have different outlooks on life and their attitudes and behaviors are also significantly different.In To the Lighthouse, Virginia Woolf discusses the influence of the traditional conception about different genders, which is the cause of gender differences. Mrs. Ramsay in the novel is the typical woman who is the slave fostered by men. Although she is not satisfied with the life of losing herself and lacking for self-confidence, she still worships her husband blindly, depends on her husband and subordinates to her husband. Besides playing the role of a virtuous wife and a lovely mother initiatively in the family and an elegant hostess in social situations, she still makes use of her influential power. Mrs. Ramsay does not only comply with social customs herself, she also impels others: she arranges for the marriage between Paul and Minta and tries to persuade Lily to marry Mr. Bankes. Under the influence of such traditional conception about different genders, Lily still feels that she can’t get rid of social prejudice to concentrate her attention on the art of painting although she is a woman having her own inclination. She always feels that she is just a second-class painter, and her works will not be hung on the wall to be seen by people. Furthermore, there is Mr. Tansley whispering in her ear, “Women can’t paint, women can’t write” obvious that her feeling of failure is caused by the influence of the traditional conception about different genders that women are inferior to men.Another great difference between different genders is that Mr. Ramsay is more realistic while Mrs. Ramsay more idealistic. This can be seen, in the very beginning of the novel, from the attitudes towards whether the Ramsays can go to the lighthouse the next day. Mrs. Ramsay says: “Yes, of course if it’s fine tomorrow, but you’ll have to be up with the lark,” then they will go to the lighthouse. These words convey an extraordinary joy to her son. But her husband comes over and refutes: “But, it won’t be fine”. What he says is the truth and the truth forever; he does not resort to deception and distort the fact, and he will not say some harsh words mildly and indirectly to satisfy others. Mrs. Ramsay comforts James: “But it may be fine –Iexpect it will be fine” (ibid.: 260). Although she has no idea about the weather of thenext day, Mrs. Ramsay is not only idealistic herself, but also wants to give her son comfort and hope. Mr. Ramsay, on the other hand, is not only rational as mentioned before, but also realistic, directly telling his son that the weather will not be fine and they can’t go to the lighthouse the next day. To Mr. Ramsay, the reality towers abo ve the rest, i.e., it’s much more important to respect the facts than to care for children. Therefore, his little son James is even anxious to kill him. As a philosopher, he may be skilled at explaining and dealing with everything in the world with his sense and logic. However, when he applies this kind of attitude to real life, such attitude seems so stubborn that he even denies human nature and suppresses others’ feeling, not only in his learning, but also in dealing with human relationship.The third difference between different genders lies in the aesthetic appreciations. Mr.Ramsay can’t feel the beauty of nature at all. In this novel, male characters come into society,engaging in scientific study. Thinking themselves as the creators of the culture, men talk about science and politics. Yet being deprived of the rights to receive education, women have to stay at home and stand beyond culture. Mr. Ramsay and Mrs. Ramsay have different reactions to the scenes of nature. For example, when Mr. Ramsay has a wal k with his wife by the seaside“he thought, looking at the land dwindling away… Poor little place,” but Mrs. Ramsay considers, “He said the mostmelancholy things,” and believes that “it was a perfectly lovely evening”.Ⅲ. ConclusionOn the whole, this dis sertation expounds on Virginia Woolf’s thoughts of gender and gender differences through the analysis of her thoughts of feminism manifested in her novel To the Lighthouse. From our analysis of the characters in the novel To the Lighthouse, we can see that Woolf’s perspective of women is unique. According to Woolf, women are not inferior to men in any field.In my opinion, the basis of Virginia Woolf’s androgynous theory has something in common with her thoughts of gender differences to a certain extent. Androgynous theory advocates that men and women command the chaotic world in their own way: men rely on their reason and logic; women rely on their intuition and self-awareness. In fact, what Woolf insists as part of her thoughts of gender differences is that mentend to be more reasonable than women and women more sensitive than men. In addition, Woolf’s thoughts of gender differences can be regarded as a bridge, connecting Woolf’s thoughts of feminism and androgynous vision.Virginia Woolf’s thoughts of wom en still have practical significance in our modern society. Nowadays, women’s social position has been greatly improved, but there are many unfair treatments of women in the society, especially in finding jobs. There are many women isolated in their families after marriage, which is partly caused by their insufficient confidence in themselves. So it is time to get rid of the biased thoughts of gender differences about women and women themselves should believe that they can do many things like men. However, as a matter of fact, women should realize that they have both advantages and disadvantages. In this sense, women should not reject all male qualities and they need to absorb some male qualities to become perfect ones. In this way, women and men can draw the strong points of others to offset their own weakness, so that our society can get a harmonious development. In short, Virginia Woolf has made a great contribution to English literature and she will always be remembered as one of the most prominent women writers in England forever.Reference[1] 程英. Art of Fiction in To the Lighthouse [D].郑州：郑州大学，2002[2]李嵩岳. 《到灯塔去》两性形象的象征意义阐述[D]. 郑州，郑州大学，2009 [2] 吴庆宏. 弗吉尼亚伍尔夫与女权主义[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2005.[4]. 王文艳. 《到灯塔去》中的女性意识[D].长沙：湖南师范大学，2001。

《到灯塔去》的象征主义研究本文从网络收集而来，上传到平台为了帮到更多的人，如果您需要使用本文档，请点击下载按钮下载本文档（有偿下载），另外祝您生活愉快，工作顺利，万事如意！引言弗吉尼亚·伍尔芙是著名的英国女作家、意识流文学代表人，作品《到灯塔去》是其意识流作品迈入成熟阶段的标志性力作，这是一本极具象征性特点的意识流小说。

这部作品出版以后，作者曾经提到“我并未将灯塔去指代某一个含义，小说总应该有一根主要线索去将它建构成为一个整体。

”虽然作者是这样说，但是大多数时候，它总会令人想到为人们指明道路的光线;也可以理解为象征救世，作品的名字则很容易令人想到这意味着追寻真理并到达最高境界。

有很多文学评论家对作品中的象征含义给出了各不一样的解释，而伍尔芙的确在其作品中设置了多重含义的隐喻，同时给出了很多留白的空间。

小说通过展现角色“内在真实”表达生活的真实，即人本身复杂且极富变化的内心活动。

为了将这一理论变为现实，象征遍布在这部作品里各个角落，如果把象征划分成通常含义与特殊含义，那么前面一个应当指代可以使读者产生大众化感情及想象的象征，例如白色令人想起无暇洁白，十字架令人想起圣洁，鸽子会令人想起和平;而特殊象征指代作家在著作中独创出的有着特别意义的象征，有的时候也可由阅读者依据自身的解读来领会作品的特别含义。

伍尔芙的《到灯塔去》的象征为阅读者提供了多重不同的角度——不但可以思考作品主旨，还可深入地思考作家整个人生经历。

一、灯塔对人物的象征内涵除去常规意义上的象征之外，灯塔对小说里面出现的不同角色，甚至是作者本身都有着完全不同的含义。

对拉姆齐夫人而言，夜晚远远的闪耀着梦幻光彩的灯塔是如此的美好，“那么美好!在她的面前是蔚蓝的大海;那远处灰白的灯塔看上去遥不可及又庄严肃穆”。

在她的眼里，灯塔代表了安静与和谐，它是永恒的存在，同时是她能够释放心灵与缓解压力的最好地点。

在小说中，灯塔之光通常和拉姆齐夫人关联在一块，“她经常意识到自己安坐在那里瞭望远方，安静地坐着，看着，手中不停地忙着自己的针线活，直至她和远处的灯光融在一起。

弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的《到灯塔去》中的意识流技巧引言弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫（Virginia Woolf）是二十世纪最具影响力的英国现代主义作家之一。

她以其独特的写作风格和突破传统文学模式的实验性技巧而闻名。

其中，《到灯塔去》是她最著名的小说之一，被认为是对意识流技巧应用最成功的例子之一。

本文将探讨弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫在《到灯塔去》中运用的意识流技巧。

意识流技巧的定义意识流是指通过描绘出一个人内心思想活动过程来表达其感知、情感和想法。

它追求将内心复杂而瞬息万变的思考过程直接呈现在读者眼前，以此打破传统叙述线性结构，以非线性或碎片化形式呈现。

《到灯塔去》中的意识流技巧在《到灯塔去》这部小说中，弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫充分利用了意识流技巧来描绘人物的内心世界和思想过程，使读者更深入地了解到每个角色的情感和态度。

1. 内省与自我意识《到灯塔去》中的意识流技巧常常围绕着主要人物们的内省和自我意识展开。

通过呈现角色对外界事件和周围环境的关注，同时也展示了他们内心深处的情感和思考。

这种通过复杂而纷繁的思绪来描述角色心理活动的手法，令读者能够更加立体地认识主人公。

2. 时间与空间的碎片化表达伍尔夫在小说中采取了非线性叙事结构，并将时间和空间进行碎片化处理，以模拟人类记忆和思考的运作方式。

这种碎片化表达方式使整个故事呈现出一个非连贯且多重视角交织的画面。

读者在阅读过程中会体验到一种跳跃式、颠簸式的感觉，在不同时间点和场景之间切换，从而进一步理解人物心理状态及其变化。

3. 感知与感官细节描写伍尔夫善于运用生动的感官细节来表现人物思考的复杂性以及情感的流动。

她通过丰富而精确的描写，将读者引入到主人公所经历的环境中去，使他们能够更加直观地感受到情绪变化、意象联想等心理活动。

4. 意象和联想的使用在《到灯塔去》中，伍尔夫采用了大量的意象和联想来传达主人公内心世界。

这些意象和联想一方面反映着角色对外部事物的感知和体验，另一方面也是角色内心思考和情感状态的具象化呈现。

导言弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫是英国著名的女权主义思想家和女性主义作家。

她的长篇论文《一间自己的屋子》大胆提出的―如果一个女人要想写作，就必须有一间属于自己的屋子‖对后来的女性主义者产生了很大的影响。

正如肖瓦尔特说：―如果说女权主义文学批评是妇女运动的女儿，那么它的另一个父母则是古老的父权制的文学批评和理论成果。

‖女性主义文学批评理论以妇女为中心，研究对象包括妇女形象、女性创作和女性阅读，要求以一种女性的视角对父权制文学作品进行全新的解读，探讨女性意识，研究女性写作。

如果说《一间自己的屋子》是伍尔夫对其女性主义文学理论的阐述，那么，小说《到灯塔去》则是作家对其女性主义文学理论的大胆实践。

小说揭露了父权制社会女性所遭受的种种歧视和不公平待遇，提出了女性获取平等的途径，并且实践了其女性主义写作理论。

女性意识的觉醒女性意识是女性写作首先必须具备的条件。

一个不具备女性意识的作家写不出女性主义的文艺作品。

父权制社会存在两种对立的性别意识。

一种是贬低、歧视女性的不合理的性别意识。

这是父权制社会的主流意识。

另一种是正确地看待两性的意识，但这还不是主流意识。

一方面，父权制社会炮制了大量的歪曲、丑化及虐待妇女的言行。

绝大多数的男性和女性都被这种意识所操控。

女性被父权制文化自觉与不自觉地同化了。

为了让女性自觉自愿地接受男性的奴役和压迫，东西方父权文化的一些思想家、哲学家、文学家、科学家精心编制了一套套所谓的―理论‖。

这些所谓的―理论‖千百年来仍被无数人封为―经典‖，引用转载。

父权制社会里的一些作家也通过文学作品的感染力，向女性灌输男性中心的意识形态，让妇女自觉自愿地履行他们给规定的性别角色。

女性主义文学批评的首要任务就是用批判的眼光审视男性创造的女性神话，作一种对抗性阅读，把根植于女性心中的男性意识根除。

伍尔夫在小说《到灯塔去》深刻地揭露了父权制社会对女性角色的―非科学的、非理性的‖规定。

父权制社会把―理性‖给了男人，男人是理性的。

评弗伍尔夫《到灯塔去》的意识流技巧一、本文概述本文旨在深入探讨弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫（Virginia Woolf）的经典小说《到灯塔去》（To the Lighthouse）中所运用的意识流技巧。

弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫作为20世纪英国文学的重要人物，以其独特的写作风格和技巧，尤其是意识流手法的运用，为现代小说的发展做出了重要贡献。

在《到灯塔去》这部作品中，她巧妙地运用意识流技巧，将人物内心的复杂情感和思维过程以流动、自由的形式展现出来，使得小说呈现出一种独特的艺术魅力。

本文将首先概述《到灯塔去》的基本情节和主题，进而分析伍尔夫如何通过意识流技巧来展现人物的内心世界。

随后，本文将详细探讨伍尔夫在小说中运用的各种意识流手法，如内心独白、自由联想、时间跳跃等，并分析这些手法如何增强作品的艺术效果。

本文将总结伍尔夫意识流技巧在《到灯塔去》中的成功运用，以及这些技巧对现代小说创作的启示和影响。

通过本文的探讨，读者将能够更深入地理解弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的创作风格和意识流技巧在小说中的运用。

二、弗伍尔夫与意识流文学弗伍尔夫（Virginia Woolf）是20世纪英国文学史上的一位杰出女作家，她的作品以独特的风格和深刻的主题而著称。

在弗伍尔夫的创作中，她深受意识流文学的影响，并在自己的作品中巧妙地运用了意识流技巧。

意识流文学作为一种重要的文学流派，强调对人物内心世界的深入探索和表现，而弗伍尔夫则通过意识流技巧将这种探索推向了极致。

弗伍尔夫的作品中，意识流技巧的运用主要体现在对人物内心世界的细腻描绘和展现上。

她通过对人物内心意识的流动、交织和变换进行深入的刻画，使读者能够更加真实地感受到人物的内心世界和情感变化。

这种描绘方式不仅突破了传统叙事模式的限制，也使得作品更加具有艺术性和感染力。

在《到灯塔去》这部作品中，弗伍尔夫通过意识流技巧的运用，将人物内心的情感变化与外部环境的变化相互交织，形成了一种独特的叙事结构。