PLC指令翻译

原文：PLC Communication using PROFINET: ExperimentalResults and AnalysisAbstractPROFINET is the Industrial Ethernet Standard devised by PROFIBUS International for “Ethernet on the plant floor”. PROFINET allows to implement a comprehensive communications solution on Ethernet which includes peer-to-peer communication between controllers, distributed I/O, machine safety, motion control and data acquisition. In this paper an analysis is conducted on the peer-to-peer interlocking performance based on PROFINET specification. Tests were performed to determine the performance of the peer-to-peer communication mechanism, to evaluate the impact of switches on the system, and to measure the impact of data size on peer-to-peer communication performance. The paper summarizes the test results. 1.IntroductionAlthough a wide variety of networks and fieldbuse s have been used in the manufacturing industry over the past decade [1], the widespread adoption of Ethernet as a de facto standard in other domains (e.g., the internet) has made it an attractive option to consider. The increased network speed and the reduced cost of devices has further heightened interest. The introduction of switched Ethernet has allowed formore deterministic behavior and alleviated many of the concerns about unbounded delays [2, 3, 4]. Ethernet is already being widely used as a diagnostic network in manufacturing systems and is making inroads into the control networking domain [5, 6].However, standard Ethernet (IEEE 802.3) is not a deterministic protocol, and network quality of service cannot be guaranteed. To address this inherent nondeterminism, different “flavors” of Ethernet have been proposed for use in industrial automation. Several of these add layers on top of standard Ethernet or on top of the TCP/IP protocol suite to enable the behavior of Ethernet to be moredeterministic [7]. However, the network solutions may no longer be “Ethernet” other than at the physical layer.Since time delay is an important issue in control systems, there have been a number of projects devoted to analyzing and experimentally testing network performance for use in control systems. It has been shown that the largest component of the time delay in sending messages from one node to another is typically not on the network itself, but rather the application layer that interfaces to the network [8, 9]. Experimental analyses have been carried out to specifically address the issue of delays in switched Ethernet [10, 4]. However, due to the relatively recent introduction of commercial devices that implement the new industrial Ethernet protocols, there have been only a few published accounts of their actual performance [11, 12].Over the past six months, our group at the University of Michigan has undertaken an industrial Ethernet testing project [13]. The goal of the project was to evaluate the suitability of real-time Ethernet for peer-to-peer communication between PLCs on a factory floor. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the results of our tests on PROFINET, and discuss our findings.The outline of the paper is as follows. In Section II, we summarize how PROFINET enables real-time communication over Ethernet. In Section III, we describe the tests that were performed. Section IV presents the results of those tests, and conclusions are given in Section V.2.PROFINET CBA with Real-Time Channel Communication PROFINET distinguishes two views: PROFINET IO for integration of distributed I/O and PROFINET CBA (Component Based Automation) for creation of peer-to-peer communication and interlocking between controllers in modular plants (Figure 1)All other PROFINET applications such as safety, motion control, and HMI (Human Machine Interface) are based on these communication modes. PROFINET communication is scalable in three levels: PROFINET TCP/IP Communication (NRT) enables cycle times as low as 100 ms, PROFINET Real-Time Communication (RT) enables cycle times up to 1-10 ms and Isochronous Real-Time Communication (IRT) enables cycle times up to 1 ms with Jitter less than 1µs.Component based communication is realized through PROFINET CBA which uses selectively the TCP/IP or the Real-Time (RT) channel. Communication for distributed I/O is implemented through PROFINET I/O which uses Real-Time and Isochronous Real-Time (IRT) communication.PROFINET Real-Time Channel The PROFINET Real Time Channel is a cyclic communication path used by individual stations to exchange time critical data at periodic intervals specified by the programmer. It is based on the IEEE and IEC definition s [14], which only permit a limited time for execution of Real-Time services within a bus cycle. Real-Time data are handled with higher priority than Non-Real-Time (NRT) data. The tightness of the window depends on the Real-Time characteristics. The Real-Time mechanism is based on Layer 2 of the OSI model and several protocol layers are omitted. Thus the communication overhead associated with preparing data, transferring it and making it available to the overlying application for use are reduced. Using Ethereal it was found that the total overhead associated with Cyclic Real Time communication is 56 bytes.3.Tests PerformedThe following tests were designed to measure the impact of system parameters on peer-to-peer interlocking performance using PROFINET CBA with RTcommunication method. The system parameters include data size and number of switches. The tests are vendor neutral so that any implementation can be configured to undergo each test. Connection failures or errors are not included in this test plan. To perform tests the following equipment was used: one computer with Matlab and the protocol analyzer Ethereal, SIMATIC iMap and STEP7 as configuration software, five switches from Hirschmann and two Siemens SIMATIC PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers). The PLCs were configured using the factory defaults for processor and communication allocation options. The Hirschmann switches (100Mbps) were configured for port speed auto negotiation. Due to the fact that PROFINET is based on Unicast communication the Multic ast functionality was not configured in the switches.3.1 PerformanceMetricsThe performance metrics analyzed are PLC1 Packet Time Interval and Round Trip Time Interval.PLC1 Packet Time Interval is the time between two successive transmittals of packets from PLC1. Ideally, the PLC1 Packet Time Interval is always exactly the same as the configured update interval in the PLC. However, in practice there is some variability associated with this interval. The experimental results that follow summarize the average (mean value) and the jitter (standard deviation) of the PLC1 packet time interval. These metrics (mean and standard deviation) are important, as they give ameasure of the determinismthat can be obtained for realtime control using PROFINET.Round Trip Time Interval is defined as the Time Interval needed for a packet from PLC1 to reach PLC2, be echoed and come back to PLC1. Consider a test where PLC1 generates data and PLC2 echoes themback to PLC1 through a switch.Figure 2 shows the timing chart for the communication between PLC1 and PLC2 where PLC1 sends messages at T1, T2, T3,. . . and PLC2 echoes at t1, t2, t3,. . . . PLC1 Packet Time Interval should be equal to the configured update interval on PLC1, and PLC2 Packet Time Interval should be equal to configured update interval on PLC2. If the echo from PLC2 arrives before T2, then the round trip counter getsincremented and the new value is transmitted from PLC1 at T2. Since the increment of the round trip counter is taken for calculation of the Round Trip Time Interval, in this case it should be equal to the PLC1 Packet Time Interval. Consider the case when t1 shifts relative to T2. Then the echo fromPLC2 is received after T2, and the round trip counter is not incremented in themessage transmitted from PLC1 at T2. Hence, the Round Trip Time Interval becomes twice the PLC1 Packet Time Interval.Figure 2. Timing chartFrom the above observations it is noticed that Round Trip Time interval mean and standard deviation are also important as measures of the degree of synchronization for real-time control using PROFINET.3.2 Test DescriptionsTest1: Benchmark Test1 is the benchmark test. The other tests are compared to Test1. In this test PLC1 generates eight bytes of data and PLC2 echoes it back to PLC1 through a switch. PLC1 uses the last 4 bytes (dint) of the data for a new data received counter. PLC1 increments this counter as discussed in section 3.1.To perform measurements, a PC running Ethereal was connected to the managed switch which connects to the PLCs. All packets going to and from PLC2 and theirrespective timestamps were mirrored onto this port.Test2: Network Switches The objective of Test2 is to evaluate the impact that switches introduce to the system. The number of switches between two PLCs is the test variable. The same variables are measured as in Test1. We will consider the case of three and five switches between the PLCs.Test3: Size of Data The objective of Test3 is to measure the impact of data size on peer-to-peer communication performance. The test variable is the data size. Measurements are performed as described in Test1. We will consider two cases. In the first case 216 bytes of unused data, in the second 440 bytes of unused data.4.Test ResultsIn performing the tests and analyzing the results a data capture of 5000 packets per PLC is considered in order to assess the timing performance. The average and standard deviation values of PLC1 Packet Time Interval and Round Trip Time Interval are measured in milliseconds and rounded off to th ree significant digits after the decimal point. All tests are performed with an update time of 8ms which is typical for these applications in the factory. Figures 3, 4 and 5 show the benchmark test results, PLC1 Packet Time Interval, Round Trip Time Interval histogram, and Round Trip Time Interval scattering diagram respectively. We can notice the highly deterministic behavior of the network. Since we are using the PROFINET RT protocol a similar behavior is expected also from the other tests.Figure 3. Test1 PLC1 Packet Time Interval histogram4.1 Network SwitchesTo evaluate the impact that switches introduce to the system, data results from Test1 will be compared to those obtained from Test2. Tables 1 and 2 show that, in the case of three or five switche s between two PLCs, there are no significant changes between the two tests. PLCs Packet Time Interval and Round Trip Time Interval present the same average value and similar standard deviation. Figure 6 shows the histogram of round trip time interval for Test2 which is close to that of Test1 (Figure 4). As expected the switches do not alter the performance metrics. Similar resultswere found in [10].Figure 4. Test1 Round Trip Time Interval histogramFigure 5. Test1 Round Trip Time Interval scattering diagramFigure 6. Test2 Round Trip Time Interval histogram, case with 3 switches4.2 Size of DataBy comparing the results of Test1 and Test3 we will measure the impact of data size on peer-to-peer communication performance. As observed in Tables 1 and 2, PLC1 packet and Round Trip Time Interval average values are the same. In both PLC1 packet and Round Trip Time Intervals there is a decrease of value in standard deviation. Figure 7 shows the Round Trip Time Interval of Test3 with three switches which behaves like Test1 round trip interval (Figure 4). From the results obtained (Tables 1 and 2) we can conclude that data size does not impact Packet and RoundTrip Time Interval.Figure 7. Test3 Round Trip Time Interval histogram, case with 216 bytes 5.ConclusionsTo measure the impact of data size carried by a packet and switches on a PROFINET CBA with RT communication based network three tests were designed. Test1, represented by a simple network made of two PLCs and one switch, was used as benchmark. Figures 3, 4 and 5 showed the deterministic behavior of the network. Test2 is similar to Test1 but instead of one switch, three to five have been used. Test3 is also similar to Test1 but, instead of using 8 bytes data per packet, 216 and 440 bytes were used. To investigate the delay introduced by the switches Test1 and Test2 results were compared. The impact of data size was analyzed by comparing Test1 and Test3. Results show that PLC1 Packet Time Interval and Round Trip Time Interval are unaffected by data size per packet and number of switches. AcknowledgementsThis work was supported in part by the Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems of the National Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-9529125. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support received from General Motors Powertrain, Siemens and Hirschmann in thecompletion of the tests.References[1] J.-P. Thomesse, “Fieldbus Technology in Industrial Automation”, Proc. of theIEEE, vol. 93, no. 6, 2005.[2] J. M oyne and F. Lian, “Design considerations for a sensor bus system insemiconductor manufacturing”, in International SEMATECH AEC/APC Workshop XII, 2000.[3] P. G. Otanez, J. T. Parrott, J. R.Moyne, and D. M. Tilbury, “The Implications ofEthernet as a Co ntrol Network”, in Proc. of the Global Powertrain Congress, 2002.[4] K. C. Lee and S. Lee, “Performance evaluation of switched Ethernet fornetworked control systems”, in Proc. of IEEE Conf. of the Industrial Electronics Society, volume 4, 2002.[5] J.-D. Decotignie, “Ethernet-Based Real-Time and Industrial Communications”,Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 93, no. 6, 2005.[6] J. Montague, “Networks Busting Out All Over”, Control Engineering, vol. 52, no.3, March 2005.[7] M. Felser, “Real-Time Ethernet—Indus try Prospective”, Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 93,no. 6, 2005.[8] F.-L. Lian, J. R. Moyne, and D. M. Tilbury, “Network Design Consideration forDistributed Control Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, vol.10, no. 2, 2002.[9] J. T. Parrott, J. R. Moyne, and D. M. Tilbury, “Experimental Determination ofNetwork Quality of Service in Ethernet: UDP, OPC, and VPN”, in Proc. of the American Control Conf., 2006.[10] E. V onnahme, S. Ruping, and U. Ruckert, “Measurements in switched Ethernetne tworks used for automation systems”, in Proc. of IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, 2000.[11] P. Ferrari, A. Flammini, and S. Vitturi, “Response Times Evaluation ofPROFINETNetworks”, in Proc. of the IEEE Int. Symposium on IndustrialElectronics, 2005.[12] P. Ferrari, A. Flammini, D.Marioli, and A. Taroni, “Experimental evaluation ofPROFINET performance”, in Proc.of the IEEE Int.Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), 2004.[13] K. Acton, S. Mantri, J. Parrott, N. Kalappa, M. Antolovic, J. Luntz, J. Moyne,and D. Tilbury, “UM-ERC Industrial Ethernet Evaluation Project: Peer-to-peer Interlockign Performance Report”, Technical report, University of Michigan Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufactu ring Systems, February 2006.[14] M. Popp, K. Weber, “The Rapid Way to PROFINET”,Editor PROFIBUSNutzeroranisation e.V., 2004.译文：PROFINET在PLC通讯中的使用：实验结果及分析摘要：PROFINET是国际现场总线在“以太网物理层”分离出来的工业以太网标准。

软件关键英文词意解释1、Access path 存取路径，访问路径2、Copy 复制，抄写，模仿3、Application 申请，请求；应用4、Delete 删除5、Properties 财产，所有权；特性6、Add 增加，补充7、Select 选择，挑选，选拔8、Cancel 取消，注销9、Remove 去除，开除，脱掉10、Covered 转化11、Interfaces 界面，接口，交界12、Family controller家庭控制器13、User parameter assignment 用户参数赋值14、Serial cable 串行切成短条15、copied from 复制16、New parameter assignment of interface 新assignment 接口参数17、Description 描写，形容18、Controller 控制者，管理者19、Station name 站名20、Dell inc 戴尔公司21、Not specified 未规定的22、Reset 重置，重排；重新安装23、Communication time out 通信超时24、Print 印痕，压印25、Check the port number 检查端口号26、Band rate 带率27、Network address 网络地址28、File 提出，发送29、The attached cable 附加电缆30、Load 负荷，装载，加载31、Viewer simplified china 观众通过中国32、Change catalog 改变目录33、pick 挑选，选择34、Save 保留35、Write to 写给，按照36、Directory 目录，地址37、Quit 离开，放弃，停止38、Os shell 操作系统外壳39、Edit 编辑，剪辑，校订40、Zoom 变焦，嗡嗡声41、Switch 开关，转换42、Trace 跟踪，探索，痕迹43、Run 进行，移动，奔跑44、Step 步骤，手段45、Compile 编译，编制46、Make 做，开始，进行47、Options 选项，选择48、Menu 菜单，菜肴49、Debug 排除故障50、Break 打破，突变51、Insert indent tab 插入缩进制52、Watch 注视，监视53、Word left / right 字左/话语权54、Cursor movement commands 光标移动命令55、Character left 太左56、Character right 人格权57、Line up / down 排队等候；组织/ 回线故障58、Scroll up / down 卷起来/ 向下滚动59、Page up / down 排好页码/ 版面往下移60、Right / left arrow 权利允许/ 左允许61、Up / down arrow 允许62、Installation 安装，装置63、Menu commands 菜单命令64、Keyboard hot keys 键盘按键65、Header files 头文件66、Header file 页眉文件67、Footer file 页脚文件68、Debugger 一种调试软件69、Graphics 制图学，制图法70、Installation 安装，装置71、Block commands 块命令72、Help index 帮助索引73、Miscellaneous 混杂的，各种各样的，多方面的74、Command-line options 命令选项75、Press 按，压76、Press any key 按任意键77、Total 总计的，全部的，78、Lines compile 线路编译79、Link 环节，纽带80、Pass 通过，批准81、Error 错误，过失，误差82、noname 无名83、Warnings 警告，告诫84、Linking 链接，关联85、Lines compile 线路编译86、Available 速效87、Available memory 可记忆88、Exe file EXE文件89、File 文件，档案；发送，提出90、Reset 重置，清零91、Program reset 程序清除92、Go to cursor 去游标93、Trace into 跟踪94、Step over 接近，走近，跨过95、User screen 用户屏幕96、Compiling 编译，编制97、Make exe file 使exe 文件98、Build all 建造所有99、Primary c file 主文件100、Primary file 源文件101、Get into 进入，陷入102、Project name 项目名，课题名103、Remove messages 删除消息105、Compiler 汇编者106、Environment 环境，外界，周围107、Livingstone 人名108、Arguments 争论，论据108、Save options 保存选项109、Evaluate 评价110、Call stack 调用钱111、Refresh 使恢复，使振作112、Find function 查找功能113、Function 功能，作用114、Refresh display 再生显示115、Debugging 调试116、Source debugging 源调试117、Swapping 交换、替换118、Display swapping 显示交换119、Delete watch 删除表120、Add watch 添加监视点121、Display 显示器，展开122、edit watch 编辑监视点123、edit 编辑，剪辑124、Toggle breakpoints 切换断点125、Clear all breakpoints 清除所有断点126、View next break points 查看下一个断点127、Modify 修改，改变128、Repair 修理，纠正，恢复129、Keypad designer 键盘设计130、Keypad 键区131、Program files 程序文件132、Siemens 西门子133、Install 安装，安置134、Time remaining 时间持续135、Remain 残余；保持，留下136、Char 把。

Introductions of PLC and MCUA PLC is a device that was invented to replace the necessary sequential relay circuits for machine control. The PLC works by looking at its inputs and depending upon their state, turning on/off its outputs .The user enters a program, usually via software or programmer that gives the desired results.PLC are used in many “real world〞applications. If there is industry present, chances are good that there is a PLC present. If you are involved in machining, packaging, material handling, automated assembly or countless other industries, you are probably already using them. If you are not, you are wasting money and time. Almost any application that needs some type of electrical control has need for PLC.For example, let’s assume that when a switch turns on we want to turn a solenoid on for 5 seconds and then turn it off regardless of how long the switch is on for. We can do this with a simple external timer. What if the process also needed to count how many times the switch individually turned on? We need a lot of external counters.As you can see, the bigger the process the more of a need we have for a PLC. We can simply program the PLC to count its inputs and turn the solenoids on for the specified time.We will take a look at what i s considered to be the “top 20〞PLC instructions. It can be safely estimated that with a firm understanding of there instructions one can solve more than 80% of the applications in existence.That‘s right, more than 80%! Of course we’ll learn more than jus t these instructions to help you solve almost ALL your potential PLC applications.The PLC mainly consists of a CPU, memory areas, and appropriate circuits to receive input/output data, as shown in Fig. 19.1 We can actually consider the PLC to be a box full of hundreds or thousands of separate relays, counters, timer and date storage locations. Do these counters, timers, etc. really exist? No, they don’t “physically〞exist but rather they are simulated and can be considered software counters, timers, etc. These internal relays are simulated through bit locations in registers.What does each part do?INPUT RELAYS-(contacts) These are connected to the outside world. They physically exist and receive signals from switches, sensors, etc... Typically they are not relays but rather they are transistors.INTERNAL UTILITY RELAYS-(contacts) These do not receive signals from the outside world nor do they physically exist. They are simulated relays and are what enables a PLC to eliminate external relays. There are also some special relays that are dedicated to performing only one task. Some are always on while some are always off. Some are on only once during power-on and are typically user for initializing data what was stored.COUNTERS These again do not physically exist. They are simulated counters and they can be programmed to count pulses. Typically these counters can count up, down or both up and down. Since there are simulated, they are limited in their counting speed. Some manufacturers also include high-speed counters that are hardware based. We can think of these as physically existing. Most timers these counters can count up, down or up and down.TIMERS These also do not physically exist. They come in many varieties and increments. The most common type is an on-delay type. Other include off-delay and both retentive and non-retentive types. Increments vary from 1ms through 1s.OUTPUT RELAYS-(coil) These are connected to the outside world. They physically exist and send on/off signals to solenoids, lights, etc… They can be transistors, relays, or triacs depending upon the model chosen.DATA STORAGE-Typically there are registers assigned to simply store data. There are usually used as temporary storage for math or data manipulation. They can also typically be user power-up they will still have the same contents as before power war removed. Very convenient and necessary!A PLC works by continually scanning a program. We can think of this scan cycle as consisting of 3 important steps, as shown in Fig. There are typically more than 3 but we can focus on the important parts and not worry about the others. Typically the others are checking the system and updating the current and timer values.Step 1-CHECK INPUT STATUS-First the PLC takes a look at each input to determine if it is on or off. In other words, is the sensor connected to the first input on? How about the second input? How about the third…It records this data into its memory to be used during the next step.Step 2-EXECUTE PROGRAM-Next the PLC executes your program one instruction at a time. Maybe your program said that if the first input was on then it should turn on the first output. Since is already knows which inputs are on/off from the previous step, it will be able to decide whether the first output should be turned onbased on the state of the first input. It will store the execution results for use later during the next step.Step 3-UPDATE OUTPUT STSTUS-Finally the PLC updates the status of outputs. It updates the outputs based on which inputs were on during the first step and the results of executing your program during the second step. Based on the example in step 2 it would now turn on the first output because the first input was on and your program said to turn on the first output when this condition is true.After the third step the PLC goes back to step one and repeats the steps continuously. One scan time is defined as the time is takes to execute the 3 steps listed above. Thus a practical system is controlled to perform specified operations as desired.The AT89S52 is a low-power, high-performance CMOS 8-bit microcontroller with 8Kbytes of in-system programmable Flash memory. The device is manufactured using Atmel’s high-density nonvolatile memory technology and is compatible with the industry-standard 80C51 instruction set and pin-out. The on-chip Flash allows the program memory to be reprogrammed in-system or by a conventional nonvolatile memory programmer. By combining a versatile 8-bit CPU with in-system programmable Flash on a monolithic chip, the Atmel AT89S52 is a powerful microcontroller which provides a highly-flexible and cost-effective solution to many embedded control applications.The AT89S52 provides the following standard features: 8K bytes of Flash, 256 bytes of RAM, 32 I/O lines, Watchdog timer, two data pointers, three 16-bit timer/counters, a six-vector two-level interrupt architecture, a full duplex serial port, on-chip oscillator, and clock circuitry. In addition, the AT89S52 is designed with static logic for operation down to zero frequency and supports two software selectable power saving modes. The Idle Mode stops the CPU while allowing the RAM, timer/counters, serial port, and interrupt system to continue functioning. The Power-down mode saves the RAM contents but freezes the oscillator, disabling all other chip functions until the next interrupt or hardware reset.Port 0 is an 8-bit open drain bidirectional I/O port. As an output port, each pin can sink eight TTL inputs. When is written to port 0 pins, the pins can be used as high-impedance inputs.Port 0 can also be configured to be the multiplexed lowered address/data bus during accesses to external program and data memory. In this mode, P0 has internal pull-ups.Port 0 also receives the code bytes during Flash programming and outputs the code bytes during program verification. External pull-ups are required during program verification.Port 1 is an 8-bit bidirectional I/O port with internal Port 1 output buffers can sink/source four TTL inputs. When 1s are written to Port 1 pins, they are pulled high by the internal pull-ups and can be used as inputs. As inputs, Port 1 pins that are externally being pulled low will source current (I IL) because of the internal pull-ups.In addition, P1.0 and P1.1 can be configured to be the timer/counter 2 external count input (P1.0/T2) and the timer/counter 2 trigger input (P1.1/T2EX).PLC和微处理器简介PLC(可编程逻辑控制器)是极限控制中为代替必要的继电器时序电路而创造的一种设备。

西门子步骤7 -微/赢4.0版版权（丙）西门子能源和自动化股份有限公司，2005指标istruzioni每l'installazione1requisitirequisiti五金电子系统公司2家公司3个74个7生气勃勃的中板迪德拉语注意sull'utilizzo5à±6我不是电子解决方案6.1我6.2wipeout.exe6.3语言supportate6.4信息通信忠利苏拉6.4.1通信法6.5性à台达电子项目7使用迪德拉forzamento同路istruzioni每l'installazione1requisitirequisiti五金电子系统公司微软视窗2000服务包3successivo，视窗家专业版。

电脑在歌德迪支持被没有上帝operativi信息系统适应症（每马乔里资讯consultare拉documentazione微软）。

almeno350 M空间自由迪南迪斯科商的固定供应商。

个小的电子risoluzione极小迪1024 x768像素。

小鼠supportato达微软视窗。

我seguenti培元为拉l's7-200通信欺诈：–卡沃格电脑/生产者价格指数collegato阿拉门通用串行总线–卡沃格电脑/生产者价格指数collegato阿拉门通信连续剧（电脑1澳联合）–scheda每便携通信（处长）和卡沃格每interfaccia多点（下）–单位à迪ampliamento调制解调器em241–单位à迪ampliamento以太网cp243-1cp243-1它啊。

avvertenza：通信电子乐schedecp5613cp5614非是supportate。

我avvertenza：迪7欺诈西门子netneseè地区installato在电脑图，6.2precedente，杜兰特l'installazione浦òverificarsi一新的选择误差：“误差墓在文件sntieno.dll迪工业”的“四èverificatol'errore心率=0x80070430在序siem_isotrans“硒硅verificano问题在新的选择方式：1程序错误。