REGULATION (EU) 2015_2283 on novel food
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:520.87 KB
- 文档页数:22
各国食品级测试列表(EU,LFGB,FDA,DGCCRF等随着社会经济的发展,电饭锅,果汁机,咖啡机等各种电子电气食物制作产品的普及给我们的生活带来极大的便利。
人们在注重生活品质的同时,也日益关注食品的安全问题,但往往忽视了与食品相接触材料的安全性。
其实在日常使用中,有害物质可能会从电子产品与食品相接触的的材料中迁移至食品,进而影响人类健康。
该问题已引起各方关注,各个国家也不断出台和更新食品级材料的法律法规,维护消费者安全。
常见的各国食品级法规如下:❖欧盟——EC/1935/2004❖德国——LFGB(原来的LMBG)❖法国——French DGCCRF 2004-64❖美国——FDA CFR 21 parts 170-189❖意大利——D.M.21/03/73❖日本——《日本食品卫生法》第II节食品级测试适用范围:各种和食品接触的材料,包括金属、塑料、硅橡胶、涂层、玻璃、陶瓷、木材、纸张等。
常见食品级材料所涉及的产品包括:◆电饭煲、烤炉、咖啡机等与食品接触的电器产品;◆食品储藏用品、菜板、不锈钢等厨具;◆碗、勺、杯、盘、刀叉等餐具;◆食品包装材料。
各国对食品接触材料的管控不仅仅反映在法规当中,也体现在政府的实际行动当中,各国都有相关的政府机构对产品进行抽查和追踪,一旦发现不合格产品,将公开通报不合格产品,并采取召回、退关等强制行动。
欧洲食品饲料快速预警系统(RASFF)历年公布的预警数据表明,中国(包括大陆地区和香港)已经成为案例通报最为频繁的产品产地,这引起了欧盟各成员国和众多企业的高度关注。
宁波捷通凭借丰富的认证检测经验,长期以来为企业提供全面的食品级材料测试服务,包括塑料、金属、陶瓷、橡胶、不粘涂层等各种产品材质,协助企业确认产品能满足欧盟、美国、日本等国的各项严格要求。
食品级材料实验室测试服务食品级测试服务是通过测试与食品接触的材料(常见的有PP塑料、硅橡胶、不锈钢、陶瓷、玻璃、不粘锅等有机涂层、木头、竹制品等)的化学参数、生物参数以及感官参数,对产品成分和安全性进行分析。
XXXXXXXX有限公司XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX2015年6月4日,欧盟在其官方公报上发布指令(EU) 2015/863对2011/65/EU(RoHS 2.0)的限用物质清单(AnnexⅡ)进行修订,将四种邻苯二甲酸盐(DEHP、BBP、DBP和DIBP)正式列入到限用物质清单中,限值均为0.1 %。
本次修订自欧盟公报上公告后第二十天起生效,各成员国须在2016年12月31日前将指令转化为本国法令。
新增的四种邻苯二甲酸盐管控的实施日期:考虑到企业满足新的有害物质要求需要一定时间,所以(EU)2015/863中规定了相应的过渡期:所有电子电器产品(除医疗设备和监控仪器)自2019年7月22日起需满足新要求,医疗设备和监控仪器自2021年7月22日起需满足新要求。
RoHS指令变化解读:1. DEHP、BBP、DBP及DIBP的限值要求并不适用于在2019年7月22日之前在市场上出售的电缆或者用于电子电气设备(EEE)的维修、重复使用及功能性更新亦或是性能升级改造的备用零配件,同时并不适用于在2021年7月22日之前在市场上出售的医疗设备和监控设备。
2. DEHP、BBP及DBP的限值要求并不适用于那些已经受到欧盟法规No 1907/2006(REACH)附录XVII条目51条中对DEHP、BBP及DBP相关限制的玩具。
3. 删除了之前RoHS 2.0中的六溴环十二烷HBCDD,是由于欧委会认为该物质不属于RoHS指令的规管范围,且该物质已属于《关于持久性有机污染物的斯德哥尔摩公约》的范畴,根据SGS大量测试数据显示,邻苯二甲酸酯类物质作为增塑剂在电子电气产品中使用广泛,可能存在于电线电缆、塑料、油漆油墨等各种材料中。
聚氯乙烯材料(PVC)更是目前检出含有邻苯二甲酸酯的材料重灾区,应该引起企业的高度关注。
PVC材质目前仍然属于材料界使用较广泛的材质,更多企业因考虑到替换PVC材料的成本上升而没有提前改善,按照最近的RoHS邻苯执行时间,企业虽然还有4年的时间来应对此次RoHS的改变,但是考虑到电子产品的供应链传递及工艺改进,这都将耗费一定的时间,部分企业可能会缩短对于供应商在产品均一材料中的限制使用的时间节点。
欧盟医疗器械法规(eu) 2017-746(英文+中文版)Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on medical devices, also known as the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), is a comprehensive piece of legislation that sets out the rules and requirements for medical devices in the European Union. The regulation was adopted on April 5, 2017, and will fully apply starting from May 26, 2021. It replaces the previous Medical Devices Directive (MDD) and Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive (AIMDD).The main objective of the MDR is to ensure the safety and performance of medical devices while promoting innovation and access to market for manufacturers. The regulation introduces several new requirements for medical devices, including stricter pre-market assessment procedures, enhanced post-market surveillance obligations, and improved traceability and transparency.One of the key changes introduced by the MDR is the new classification system for medical devices, which is based on potential risk to patients. The regulation also establishes a Unique Device Identification (UDI) system to improve traceability of devices throughout the supply chain. In addition, the MDR requires manufacturers to provide more clinical evidence forhigh-risk devices and to demonstrate compliance with general safety and performance requirements.The MDR also strengthens the role of notified bodies, which are responsible for assessing the conformity of medical devices with the regulatory requirements. Notified bodies must now meet higher standards of competence and independence, and are subject to stricter supervision by national authorities.Overall, the MDR aims to improve the safety and effectiveness of medical devices on the EU market, while also enhancing the transparency and predictability of the regulatory framework. By ensuring that medical devices meet high standards of quality and performance, the regulation ultimately benefits patients, healthcare professionals, and manufacturers alike.。
国家质量监督检验检疫总局警示通告2015年6号——质检总局关于欧盟修订玩具安全指令的警示通告文章属性•【制定机关】国家质量监督检验检疫总局(已撤销)•【公布日期】2015.12.21•【文号】国家质量监督检验检疫总局警示通告2015年6号•【施行日期】2015.12.21•【效力等级】部门规范性文件•【时效性】现行有效•【主题分类】质量管理和监督正文国家质量监督检验检疫总局警示通告2015年6号质检总局关于欧盟修订玩具安全指令的警示通告2015年11月23日,欧盟委员会连续发布了3项指令,对欧盟玩具安全指令(2009/48/EC)进行修订,在2009/48/EC中的附件II附录C(该附录规定了“供36个月以下儿童玩耍的玩具以及供放入口中的玩具中所用化学物质的具体限量”)中新增5种化学物质的限量要求,具体内容如下表所示:物质名称CAS号限量甲酰胺Formamide 75-12-720μg/m3(28天释放测试)1,2-苯并异噻唑-3(2H)-酮1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-2634-33-5 5mg/kgone5-氯-2-甲基-4-异噻唑-3-酮和2-甲基-2H-异噻唑-3-酮按照3:1比例的混合物55965-84-9 1mg/kg5-氯-2-甲基-异噻唑-3(2H)-酮5-Chloro-2-methyl-isothiazolin-3(2H)-one 26172-55-40.75mg/kg2-甲基异噻唑-3(2H)-酮2-methylisothiazolin-3(2H)-one 2682-20-40.25mg/kg在上述物质中,甲酰胺主要用于生产发泡塑料,而其他物质主要用于玩具中的水剂材料。
欧盟要求各成员国最迟于2017年11月24日实施上述规定。
质检总局提醒输欧玩具生产企业、贸易商以及相关行业协会密切关注欧盟玩具安全指令的修订情况及其他相关信息,及早采取措施,避免不必要的损失。
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/1933of 27 October 2015amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cocoa fibre, banana chips, food supplements, dried herbs and dried spices(Text with EEA relevance)THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 315/93 of 8 February 1993 laying down Community procedures for contaminants in food (1), and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,Whereas:(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (2) sets maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs.(2) According to that Regulation, maximum levels for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) must be safe and aslow as reasonably achievable based upon good manufacturing, drying and agricultural/fishery practices.(3) Cocoa fibre is a specific cocoa product produced from the shell of the cocoa bean and contains higher levels ofPAHs than the cocoa products produced from the cocoa nibs. The cocoa fibre and derived products are intermediate products in the food chain and are used as an ingredient in the preparation of low calorie, high fibre foods. It is appropriate to establish specific levels of PAHs for cocoa fibre and derived products. Given that these products have a low fat content, it is appropriate to establish the maximum levels on a wet weight basis.(4) Banana chips are used in breakfast cereals and confectionery as well as eaten as snacks. High levels of PAHs havebeen recently found in banana chips. Those findings are related to the frying of banana chips in coconut oil.Therefore it is appropriate to establish maximum levels of PAHs for banana chips. As a first step, due to a lack of sufficient occurrence data, these maximum levels correspond to the maximum levels of coconut oil intended for direct human consumption or use as an ingredient in food. The maximum levels should be reviewed within2 years taking into account the available occurrence data.(5) High levels of PAHs have been found in certain food supplements which contain or are derived from botanicalingredients. The presence of high levels in these food supplements have been linked to the bad drying practices applied to these botanical ingredients. These high levels are avoidable by applying good practices. It is therefore appropriate to establish maximum levels for PAHs in these products which are achievable by applying good drying practices and which ensure a high level of human health protection.(6) Also food supplements containing or derived from propolis, royal jelly and spirulina have been found to containin certain cases high levels of PAHs which have been linked to the application of bad practices. As lower levels can be achieved by applying good practices, it is appropriate to establish maximum levels for PAHs in these products.(7) High levels of PAHs have also been found in dried herbs and dried spices which are also related to theapplication of bad drying practices. Therefore it is appropriate to set maximum levels for PAHs in dried herbs and dried spices. Traditional smoking and processing methods applied to smoked paprika and cardamom result in high levels of PAHs. Given that the consumption of these spices is low and to enable these smoked products to remain on the market, it is appropriate to exempt these spices from the maximum levels.(1)OJ L 37, 13.2.1993, p. 1.(2)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs(OJ L 364, 20.12.2006, p. 5).(8) A reasonable period should be provided to allow the Member States and food business operators to adapt to thenew requirements set out in this Regulation.(9) Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.(10) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee onPlants, Animals, Food and Feed,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.Article 2Foodstuffs, listed in the Annex to this Regulation with the exception of those mentioned in point 6.1.11, lawfully placed on the market prior to 1 April 2016 may remain on the market after that date until their date of minimum durability or use-by-date.Article 3This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.It shall apply from 1 April 2016 with the exception of the foodstuffs mentioned in point 6.1.11 for which the maximum level is of application from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 27 October 2015.For the CommissionThe PresidentJean-Claude JUNCKERANNEXSection 6: ‘Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons’ of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 is amended as follows: (1) point 6.1.2 is replaced by the following:(2) the following points 6.1.11, 6.1.12, 6.1.13, 6.1.14 and 6.1.15 are added:(*) Botanical preparations are preparations obtained from botanicals (e.g. whole, plant parts, fragmented or cut plants) by various processes (e.g. pressing, squeezing, extraction, fractionation, distillation, concentration, drying up and fermentation). This definition includes comminuted or powdered plants, plant parts, algae, fungi, lichen, tinctures, extracts, essential oils (other than the vegetable oils referred to in point 6.1.1), expressed juices and processed exudates.(**) The maximum level does not apply to food supplements containing vegetable oils. Vegetable oils used as an ingredient in foodsupplements should comply with the maximum level established in point 6.1.1.’。
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/1298of 28 July 2015 amending Annexes II and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products(Text with EEA relevance)THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products (1), and in particular Article 31(1) thereof,After consulting the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety,Whereas:(1) 3-Benzylidene Camphor is currently authorised for use in cosmetic products as a UV filter in a concentration up to maximum 2,0 %. It is listed under reference number 19 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.(2) The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) (2) concluded in its opinion of 18 June 2013 that, due to a margin of safety below 100, the use of 3-Benzylidene Camphor as a UV filter in cosmetic products in a concentration up to 2,0 % is considered unsafe.(3) In order to ensure the safety of sunscreen products for human health it is necessary to remove 3-Benzylidene Camphor from the list of UV filters allowed in cosmetic products as laid down in Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.(4) Considering that 3-Benzylidene Camphor is known not only as a UV filter but also as a UV absorber, its use should be banned in cosmetic products.(5) Annexes II and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.(6) The application of that restriction should be deferred to allow the industry to make the necessary adjustments to product formulations. In particular, undertakings should be granted 6 months to place on the market compliant products and to withdraw from the market non-compliant products after the entry into force of this Regulation. (7)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Cosmetic Products, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 1Annexes II and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.Article 2From 18 February 2016 only cosmetic products which comply with this Regulation shall be placed and made available on the Union market.29.7.2015L 199/22 Official Journal ofthe European Union (1)OJ L 342, 22.12.2009, p. 59. (2)Commission Decision 2008/721/EC of 5 August 2008 setting up an advisory structure of Scientific Committees and experts in the field of consumer safety, public health and the environment and repealing Decision 2004/210/EC, OJ L 241, 10.9.2008, p. 21.Article 3 This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels, 28 July 2015.For the CommissionThe PresidentJean-Claude JUNCKERANNEXRegulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is amended as follows:(1) in Annex II, the following entry is added:(2) in Annex VI the entry concerning reference number 19 is deleted. 29.7.2015 L 199/23Official Journal ofthe European Union。
REACH法规附件XVII(2018.12.18)对某些危险物质、混合物和物品在制造,投放市场和使用过程中的限制欧盟法规(EC) No 1907/2006(即REACH法规)附件XVII修订如下:1.标题替换为如下内容:“对某些危险物质、混合物和物品在制造,投放市场和使用过程中的限制。
”2.表格展示了物质,物质组以及混合物的限制条件替换为以下内容:3.2010年3月31日修订:(EU)No 276/2010,删除第33项及第39项.2011年3月03日修订:(EU)No 207/2011,删除第44项及第53项。
2011年4月15日修订:(EU)No 366/2011,将丙烯酰胺加入清单第60项。
2011年5月20日修订:(EU)No 494/2011,修订第23项镉条款。
2012年2月9日修订:(EU)No 109/2012,修订第28、29、30项。
2012年5月15日修订:(EU)No 412/2012,将富马酸二甲酯加入清单第61项。
2012年9月19日修订:(EU)No 836/2012,将铅及其化合物加入清单第63项2012年9月19日修订:(EU)No 835/2012,对第23项镉限制条款进行修订。
2012年9月20日修订:(EU)No 847/2012,对第18a项汞限制条款进行修订。
2012年9月20日修订:(EU)No 848/2012,将苯汞化合物加入清单第62项。
2013年2月14日修订:(EU)No 126/2013,删除第42项短链氯化石蜡,修订第6项、16项、17项、28~30项、40项、47项、56项以及附录4、6、10(其中附录修订此文档未归纳)。
2013年12月06日修订:(EU)No 1272/2013,对第50项PAHs限制条款进行修订。
2014年3月25日修订:(EU)No 301/2014,对第47项六价铬限制条款进行修订。
2014年3月27日修订:(EU)No 317/2014,对ANNEX XVII的附录1,2,4,6进行了修订。
关于公布商品归类行政裁定的公告
海关总署公告2015年第28号
根据《中华人民共和国海关行政裁定管理暂行办法》(海关总署令第92号)和《中华人民共和国海关进出口货物商品归类管理规定》(海关总署令第158号),海关受理了上海日东光学有限公司提交的商品名称为“偏光片(偏光板)”的商品归类行政裁定申请。
现将作出的商品归类行政裁定予以公布(详见附件)。
本公告自发布之日起执行。
海关作出的行政裁定所依据的法律、行政法规及规章中的相关规定发生变化,影响行政裁定效力的,原行政裁定自动失效。
特此公告。
附件:2015年商品归类行政裁定.doc
海关总署
2015年6月3日。
海关总署公告2015年29号――关于执行《外商投资产业指
导目录(2015年修订)》的公告
【法规类别】海关综合规定119
【发文字号】海关总署公告[2015]29号
【发布部门】海关总署
【发布日期】2015.06.18
【实施日期】2015.04.10
【时效性】现行有效
【效力级别】XE0303
海关总署公告
(〔2015〕29号)
关于执行《外商投资产业指导目录(2015年修订)》的公告
国家发展改革委、商务部第22号令公布了《外商投资产业指导目录(2015年修订)》(详见附件),并规定自2015年4月10日起施行。
现就海关执行中的有关问题公告如下:
一、自2015年4月10日起,对属于《外商投资产业指导目录(2015年修订)》鼓励类范围的外商投资项目(包括增资项目),在投资总额内进口的自用设备以及按照合同随
上述设备进口的技术和配套件、备件,除《外商投资项目不予免税的进口商品目录》和《进口不予免税的重大技术装备和产品目录》所列商品外,按照《。
I(Legislative acts)REGULATIONSREGULATION (EU) 2015/2283 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILof 25 November 2015on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of theCouncil and repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Counciland Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001(Text with EEA relevance)THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),Whereas:(1)The free movement of safe and wholesome food is an essential aspect of the internal market and contributes significantly to the health and well-being of citizens, and to their social and economic interests. Differences between national laws concerning the safety assessment and authorisation of novel foods may hinder the free movement of such food, thereby creating legal uncertainty and unfair conditions of competition.(2) A high level of protection of human health and of consumers' interests and the effective functioning of theinternal market needs to be assured in the pursuit of Union food policies, whilst ensuring transparency. A high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment are among the objectives of the Union as established in the Treaty on European Union (TEU). It is important that all relevant Union legislation, including this Regulation, take those objectives into account.(3) Union legislation applicable to food is also applicable to novel foods placed on the market within the Union,including novel foods imported from third countries.(4) The Union's rules on novel foods were established by Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament andof the Council (3) and by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001 (4). Those rules need to be updated(1)OJ C 311, 12.9.2014, p. 73.(2)Position of the European Parliament of 28 October 2015 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of16 November 2015.(3)Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel foodingredients (OJ L 43, 14.2.1997, p. 1).to simplify the current authorisation procedures and to take account of recent developments in Union law and technological progress. Regulations (EC) No 258/97 and (EC) No 1852/2001 should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.(5) Food intended to be used for technological purposes and genetically modified food which is already covered byother Union acts should not fall within the scope of this Regulation. Therefore, genetically modified food falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), food enzymes falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), food used solely as additives falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3), food flavourings falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) and extraction solvents falling within the scope of Directive 2009/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.(6) The existing definition of novel food in Regulation (EC) No 258/97 should be clarified and updated with areference to the general definition of food provided for in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6).(7) In order to ensure continuity with the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 258/97, one of the criteria for foodto be considered a novel food should continue to be the absence of use for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before the date of entry into force of that Regulation, namely 15 May 1997. Use within the Union should also refer to a use in the Member States irrespective of the dates of their accession.(8) The scope of this Regulation should, in principle, remain the same as the scope of Regulation (EC) No 258/97.However, on the basis of scientific and technological developments that have occurred since 1997, it is appropriate to review, clarify and update the categories of food which constitute novel foods. Those categories should cover whole insects and their parts. There should be, inter alia, categories for food with a new or intentionally modified molecular structure, as well as for food from cell culture or tissue culture derived from animals, plants, microorganisms, fungi or algae, for food from microorganisms, fungi or algae and for food from material of mineral origin. There should also be a category covering food from plants obtained by non-traditional propagating practices where those practices give rise to significant changes in the composition or structure of the food affecting its nutritional value, metabolism or level of undesirable substances. The definition of novel food may also cover food consisting of certain micelles or liposomes.(9) Emerging technologies in food production processes may have an impact on food and thereby on food safety.Therefore, this Regulation should further specify that a food should be considered a novel food where it results from a production process not used for food production within the Union before 15 May 1997, which gives rise to significant changes in the composition or structure of a food affecting its nutritional value, metabolism or level of undesirable substances.(10) To ensure a high level of protection of human health and consumers' interests, food consisting of engineerednanomaterials should also be considered a novel food under this Regulation. The term ‘engineered nanomaterial’(1)Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food andfeed (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1).(2)Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food enzymes and amendingCouncil Directive 83/417/EEC, Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999, Directive 2000/13/EC, Council Directive 2001/112/EC and Regulation (EC) No 258/97 (OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 7).(3)Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives (OJ L 354,31.12.2008, p. 16).(4)Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on flavourings and certain foodingredients with flavouring properties for use in and on foods and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91, Regulations (EC) No 2232/96 and (EC) No 110/2008 and Directive 2000/13/EC (OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 34).(5)Directive 2009/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the approximation of the laws of the MemberStates on extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients (OJ L 141, 6.6.2009, p. 3).is currently defined in Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). For consistency and coherence purposes, it is important to ensure a single definition of engineered nanomaterial in the area of food law. The appropriate legislative framework for including such a definition is this Regulation.Accordingly, the definition of engineered nanomaterial, along with the related conferral of delegated powers to the Commission, should be deleted from Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 and replaced by a reference to the definition set out in this Regulation. Furthermore, this Regulation should provide that the Commission should, by means of delegated acts, adjust and adapt the definition of engineered nanomaterial set out in this Regulation to technical and scientific progress or to definitions agreed at international level.(11) Vitamins, minerals and other substances intended to be used in food supplements in accordance with Directive2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) and Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) or in infant formula and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food for infants and young children, food for special medical purposes, and total diet replacement for weight control in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), should also be assessed in accordance with the rules laid down in this Regulation when they fall within the definition of novel food set out therein.(12) Where vitamins, minerals or other substances used in accordance with Directive 2002/46/EC, Regulation (EC)No 1925/2006 or Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 result from a production process not used for food production within the Union before 15 May 1997, which gives rise to significant changes in the composition or structure ofa food, affecting its nutritional value, metabolism or level of undesirable substances, or where those vitamins,minerals or other substances contain or consist of engineered nanomaterials, they should also be considered novel foods under this Regulation and should be re-assessed first in accordance with this Regulation and subsequently in accordance with the relevant specific legislation.(13) A food used before 15 May 1997 exclusively as, or in, a food supplement, as defined in Directive 2002/46/EC,should be permitted to be placed on the market within the Union after that date for the same use, as it should not be considered to be a novel food for the purposes of this Regulation. However, that use as, or in, a food supplement should not be taken into account for the assessment of whether the food was used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before 15 May 1997. Therefore, uses of the food concerned other than as, or in, a food supplement should be subject to this Regulation.(14) Food from animal clones has been regulated under Regulation (EC) No 258/97. It is crucial that no legalambiguity should emerge as regards the placing on the market of food from animal clones during the transitional period after the end of the application of Regulation (EC) No 258/97. Therefore, until specific legislation on food from animal clones enters into force, food from animal clones should fall under the scope of this Regulation as food from animals obtained by non-traditional breeding practices and should be appropriately labelled for the final consumer in accordance with the Union legislation in force.(15) The placing on the market within the Union of traditional foods from third countries should be facilitated wherethe history of safe food use in a third country has been demonstrated. Those foods should have been consumed in at least one third country for at least 25 years as a part of the customary diet of a significant number of people. The history of safe food use should not include non-food uses or uses not related to normal diets.(1)Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of foodinformation to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18).(2)Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 on the approximation of the laws of the MemberStates relating to food supplements (OJ L 183, 12.7.2002, p. 51).(3)Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins andminerals and of certain other substances to foods (OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p. 26).(4)Regulation (EU) No 609/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on food intended for infants and young(16) Foods from third countries which are regarded as novel foods in the Union should only be considered astraditional foods from third countries when they are derived from primary production as defined in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, regardless of whether or not they are processed or unprocessed foods.(17) Food produced exclusively from food ingredients that do not fall within the scope of this Regulation, inparticular by changing the ingredients of the food or their amount, should not be considered to be a novel food.However, modifications to a food ingredient that has not yet been used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union, should fall within the scope of this Regulation.(18) Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) applies in cases where a product, takinginto account all its characteristics, may fall both within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ as laid down in that Directive and within the definition of a product covered by this Regulation. In that respect, where a Member State establishes in accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC that a product is a medicinal product, it may restrict the placing on the market of that product in accordance with Union law. Moreover, medicinal products are excluded from the definition of food as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and should therefore not fall within the scope of this Regulation.(19) The determination of whether a food was used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Unionbefore 15 May 1997 should be based on information submitted by food business operators and, where appropriate, supported by other information available in Member States. Food business operators should consult Member States if they are unsure of the status of the food which they intend to place on the market. Where there is no information on human consumption before 15 May 1997 or the information available is insufficient, a simple and transparent procedure, involving the Commission, the Member States and food business operators, should be established for collecting such information.(20) Novel foods should be authorised and used only if they fulfil the criteria laid down in this Regulation. Novelfoods should be safe and if their safety cannot be assessed and scientific uncertainty persists, the precautionary principle may be applied. Their use should not mislead the consumer. Therefore, where a novel food is intended to replace another food, it should not differ from that food in a way that would be nutritionally less advantageous for the consumer.(21) Novel foods should not be placed on the market or used in food for human consumption unless they areincluded in a Union list of novel foods authorised to be placed on the market within the Union (‘the Union list’).Therefore, it is appropriate to establish, by means of an implementing act, the Union list by including in that list the novel foods already authorised or notified in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 258/97, including any existing authorisation conditions. That list should be transparent and easily accessible.(22) It is appropriate to authorise a novel food by updating the Union list subject to the criteria and procedures laiddown in this Regulation. A procedure that is efficient, time-limited and transparent should be put in place. As regards traditional foods from third countries having a history of safe food use, the applicants should be able to opt for a faster and simplified procedure to update the Union list if no duly reasoned safety objections are expressed.(23) Criteria for the assessment of the safety risks arising from novel foods should also be clearly defined and laiddown. In order to ensure the harmonised scientific assessment of novel foods, such assessments should be carried out by the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’). Under the procedure for authorising a novel food and updating the Union list, the Authority should be requested to give its opinion if the update is liable to have an effect on human health. In its opinion, the Authority should assess, inter alia, all the characteristics of the novel food that may pose a safety risk to human health and consider possible effects on vulnerable groups of the population. In particular, the Authority should verify that, where a novel food consists of engineered nanomaterials, the most up-to-date test methods are used to assess their safety.(24) The Commission and the Authority should be subject to deadlines to guarantee a smooth processing ofapplications. However, in certain cases, the Commission and the Authority should have the right to extend those deadlines.(25) The applicant may be requested by the Authority or by the Commission to provide additional information for thepurposes of risk assessment or risk management respectively. In case the applicant fails to provide the additional information, as required, within the period set by the Authority or by the Commission after consulting the applicant, lack of such information may have consequences for the opinion of the Authority or for a possible authorisation and update of the Union list.(26) As regards the possible use of nanomaterials for food use, the Authority considered in its opinion of 6 April2011 on Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain that limited information is available in relation to aspects of nanotoxicokinetics and toxicology of engineered nanomaterials and that existing toxicity testing methods may need methodological modifications. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Council Recommendation of 19 September 2013 on the Safety Testing and Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials concluded that the approaches for the testing and assessment of traditional chemicals are, in general, appropriate for assessing the safety of nanomaterials, but may have to be adapted to the specificities of nanomaterials. In order to better assess the safety of nanomaterials for food use and in order to address the current gaps in toxicological knowledge and measurement methodologies, test methods, including non-animal tests, which take into account specific characteristics of engineered nanomaterials may be needed.(27) When test methods are applied to nanomaterials, an explanation should be provided by the applicant of theirscientific appropriateness for nanomaterials and, where applicable, of the technical adaptations and adjustments that have been made in order to respond to the specific characteristics of those materials.(28) When a novel food is authorised and included in the Union list, the Commission should have the power tointroduce post-market monitoring requirements to monitor the use of the authorised novel food to ensure that the use is within safe limits as established in the risk assessment by the Authority. Post-market monitoring requirements may therefore be justified by the necessity to gather information on the actual marketing of the food. In any event, food business operators should inform the Commission of any new relevant information regarding the safety of the food they have placed on the market.(29)New technologies and innovations in food production should be encouraged as they could reduce the environmental impact of food production, enhance food security and bring benefits to consumers as long as the high level of consumer protection is ensured.(30) Under specific circumstances, in order to stimulate research and development within the agri-food industry, andthus innovation, it is appropriate to protect the investment made by the applicants in gathering the information and data provided in support of an application for a novel food made in accordance with this Regulation. The newly developed scientific evidence and proprietary data provided in support of an application for inclusion of a novel food in the Union list should be protected. Those data and information should, for a limited period of time, not be used to the benefit of a subsequent applicant, without the agreement of the initial applicant. The protection of scientific data provided by an applicant should not prevent other applicants from seeking the inclusion of a novel food in the Union list on the basis of their own scientific data or by referring to the protected data with the agreement of the initial applicant. However, the overall five-year period of data protection which has been granted to the initial applicant should not be extended due to the granting of data protection to subsequent applicants.(31) In cases where an applicant requests the protection of scientific data relating to the same food in accordance withthis Regulation and with Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), it should be possible for the respective data protection periods to run concurrently. Therefore, provision should be made for staying, on request by the applicant, the authorisation procedure for a novel food.(32) In accordance with Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), tests on animalsshould be replaced, reduced or refined. Therefore, within the scope of this Regulation, duplication of animal testing should be avoided, where possible. Pursuing this goal could reduce possible animal welfare and ethical concerns with regard to novel food applications.(33) Novel foods are subject to the general labelling requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 andother relevant labelling requirements in Union food law. In certain cases it may be necessary to provide for additional labelling information, in particular regarding the description of the food, its source, its composition or its conditions of intended use to ensure that consumers are sufficiently informed of the nature and safety of the novel food, particularly with regard to vulnerable groups of the population.(34) Materials and articles intended to come into contact with novel foods are subject to Regulation (EC)No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) and the specific measures adopted thereunder.(35) In line with the Commission's better regulation policy, the Commission should carry out an ex-post evaluation ofthe implementation of this Regulation, addressing in particular the new procedures on traditional foods from third countries.(36) For those applications which have been submitted under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 and for which a finaldecision has not been taken before the date of application of this Regulation risk assessment and authorisation procedures should be concluded in accordance with this Regulation. Furthermore, a food not falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 258/97, which was lawfully placed on the market before the date of application of this Regulation and which falls under the scope of this Regulation, should in principle be allowed to continue to be placed on the market until the risk assessment and authorisation procedures under this Regulation have been concluded. Therefore, transitional provisions should be laid down to ensure a smooth transition to the rules of this Regulation.(37) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised, in particular, by theCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.(38) The Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shouldtake all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.(39) In order to achieve the objectives of this Regulation, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance withArticle 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the adjustment and adaptation of the definition of engineered nanomaterial to technical and scientific progress or to definitions agreed at international level. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.(40) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation with regard to updating theUnion list concerning the adding of a traditional food from a third country where no reasoned safety objections have been expressed, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.(41) The advisory procedure should be used for the adoption of the implementing act establishing the initial Unionlist given that it will concern only novel foods that have already been assessed for their safety, have been legally produced and marketed in the Union and have not given rise to health concerns in the past. The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts in all other cases.(1)Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for(42) Since the objectives of this Regulation, in particular the laying down of rules for the placing of novel foods onthe market within the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives,HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:CHAPTER ISUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONSArticle 1Subject matter and purpose1.This Regulation lays down rules for the placing of novel foods on the market within the Union.2.The purpose of this Regulation is to ensure the effective functioning of the internal market while providing a high level of protection of human health and consumers' interests.Article 2Scope1.This Regulation applies to the placing of novel foods on the market within the Union.2.This Regulation does not apply to:(a) genetically modified foods falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003;(b) foods when and in so far as they are used as:(i) food enzymes falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008;(ii) food additives falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008;(iii) food flavourings falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008;(iv) extraction solvents used or intended to be used in the production of foodstuffs or food ingredients and falling within the scope of Directive 2009/32/EC.Article 3Definitions1.For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions laid down in Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 apply.2.The following definitions also apply:(a) ‘novel food’ means any food that was not used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Unionbefore 15 May 1997, irrespective of the dates of accession of Member States to the Union, and that falls under at least one of the following categories:(i) food with a new or intentionally modified molecular structure, where that structure was not used as, or in, a。