法律英语口语试题及答案整理
为什么理应废除死刑有这样几个理由：死刑是一个有缺；
9.Todiscusstheimportance；Mirandawarningisawarning；Mirandawarningguranteest；Mirandawarningalsomeanst；thiswarningrestrainsthep；米兰达警告：在刑事犯罪嫌疑人被询问
之前，警察将其；米兰达警告
为什么理应废除死刑有这样几个理由：死刑是一个有缺陷的机制。证据表明，刑事司法系统（CJS）充斥着错误、贪官污吏和有缺陷的做法，但这个系统是仍然被授权作为执行死刑的机构。事实上，很多死
囚被宣布无罪，仅在2003年就包括12例，这警示我们该系统需要大修。从道德的角度来说：在很多情况下，关于死刑的道德争论集中
在―以眼还眼‖，或―以命抵命‖的经营理念。这个论点主张死刑的
道义上的公正地惩罚死罪。不过，真正的道德问题应该是是否有人有
资格说应由谁生谁死。以另一个人的生命通过一种犯罪行为，或者通
过死刑是错误的。在绝大部分情况下，已被判处死刑的罪犯被保留了
生命。不过，具有讽刺意味的是，一个理应重视人的生命社会，却剥
夺一个杀人犯的生命，而这个刑事司法系统有可能对无辜的人执行死刑？就费用来说：死囚监狱需要比囚犯监狱最为更昂贵的安全设施。
这种说法是真实的。预审和审判死刑案件的成本远远大于非死刑案件。此外，死刑案件的上诉和再审的成本是天文数字。省下来的钱应该花
在预防犯罪方案和教育，重塑，回到发展经济，而不是花费数十亿美
元在全国范围内谴责罪犯死刑，判处终身监禁的囚犯。
9. To discuss the importance of Miranda warning (P62)
Miranda warning is a warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody before they are interrogated to inform them about
their constitutional rights. It includes the right toremain silent; being clearly informed of that anything the person
says will be used against that person in court; the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, if he or she is indigent, an attorney
will be provided at no cost to represent her or him.
Miranda warning gurantees the constitutional rights
citizens have during the criminal investigating process.
Those rights are mainly from the fifth and sixth amendments.
Miranda warning also means the confession made by the suspects cannot be used as the evidence in court to make a sentence. Therefore,
this warning restrains the police from using illegal methods through undue process to investigate the crime and to get confession from suspects.
米兰达警告：在刑事犯罪嫌疑人被询问之前，警察将其羁押时应
该告诉他们的宪法权利。内容包括：有权保持沉默；但其说的每一句
话都将作为呈堂证供；有权咨询律师，包括在其被询问的过程中律师
也能够在场。如果嫌疑人没有钱请律师，也会为他免费请代理律师。
米兰达警告保证了公民在刑事犯罪调查过程中的宪法权利，主要
是宪法修正案五和修正案六中的权利。
米兰达警告同时也意味着嫌疑人的供述不能作为法庭审判的依据。
所以，米兰达警告限制了警察用非法的诉讼程序去调查犯罪以及
从嫌疑人出得到供述。
10. To discuss the function of voir dire （P89）
The voir dire is the process used to select a jury.
The prospective jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and potential biases before being chosen to sit
on a jury. The function is to select a jury acceptable to both sides. Jurors are excluded by one or two methods：preemptory challenge and the challenge for cause. Jurors are excluded who
1) have already formed an opinion about the guilt or innocence of the accused;
2) are related to any of the parties or legal actors in the case;
3) are physically or mentally impaired to the extent that the impairment will interfere with their decision-making process or
4) are otherwise considered to be incapable of remaining impartial until the case is presented.
There are no limits to the number challenges for cause that either side may employ.
Actually one of the unspoken purposes of the voir dire
for the attorneys to get a feel for the personalities and likely views of the people on the jury panel.
陪审团资格审查程序是用来选择一个合格的陪审团。
在被选择成为一个真正的陪审团成员之前，准陪审员们被询问关于他们的背景和潜在的偏见的问题。陪审团资格审查程序的功能是选择一个能够被双方当事人接受的陪审团。排除不符合条件的准陪审员是通过一个或者两个办法，即无因回避和有因回避。被排除的陪审员是以下几种人：（1）已经形成一个关于控告是否有罪或者无罪的观点的人
